HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD 2023-44 - 88th Legislature UDC UpdateOrdinance No. , -1- u4
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS ("CITY") REPEALING ORDINANCE
NO. 2019-50 AND ORDINANCE 2022-37, RELATING TO
APPROVALS, PROCESSING, AND REQUIREMENTS FOR PLATS
AND PLANS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 212 OF THE LOCAL
GOVERNMENT CODE AND RELATING TO DEVELOPERS
SHARE OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF PROVIDING ADEQUATE
STREETS THROUGH COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM
STANDARS GOVERNING INTERNAL AND PERIMITER
STREETS; AND, AMENDING THE FOLLOWING PORTIONS OF
THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE:
CHAPTER 2, "REVIEW AUTHORITY", CHAPTER 3,
"APPLICATIONS AND PERMITS", CHAPTER 12 "PEDESTRIAN
AND VEHICLE CIRCULATION"; REPEALING CONFLICTING
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; MAKING SUCH OTHER
FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, during the 88'h Texas Legislative Regular Session, the Texas
Legislature passed and the Governor signed into law, several bills that expand, amend,
reduce, or otherwise alter the regulatory authority of the City over development of land
within the City of Georgetown City limits and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ); and
WHEREAS, the City adopted Ordinance No. 2019-50 on August 27, 2019, and
amended said ordinance with Ordinance No. 2022-37 adopted on April 26, 2022, to relating
to the approvals, processing, and requirements for plats and plans
WHEREAS, the City adopted a set of comprehensive development regulations
known as the Unified Development Code (UDC) via Ordinance No. 2003-16, and has
amended the UDC with multiple ordinances since then; and
WHEREAS, the City finds it necessary to amend the UDC to provide for clarity,
efficiency, and ensure compliance with newly adopt State Law while protecting the health
and welfare of the general public and ensuring effective protection of the City's residents,
infrastructure, and natural resources.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS THAT:
Section 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are
hereby found and declared to be true and correct and are incorporated by reference herein
and expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim.
Ordinance Number: ZD? 3- 4 y Page 1 of 3
Description: 88" Legislature UDC Update, Omnibus
Date Approved: August 22, 2023
Section 2. Ordinance No. 2019-50 and Ordinance No 2022-37 are hereby repealed,
in their entirety.
Section 3. Chapter 2 of the UDC, titled "Review Authority", is hereby amended
and shall provide as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto.
Section 4. Chapter 3 of the UDC, titled "Applications and Permits", is hereby
amended and shall provide as shown in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
Section 5. Chapter 12 of the UDC, titled "Pedestrian and Vehicle Circulation", is
hereby amended and shall provide as shown in Exhibit C, attached hereto.
Section 6. All ordinances or resolutions that are in conflict with the provisions of
this ordinance are, and the same are hereby, repealed and all other ordinances or resolutions
of the City not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force
and effect.
Section 7. If any provision of this ordinance, or application thereof, to any person
or circumstance, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions,
or application thereof, of this ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid
provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are hereby declared
to be severable.
Section 8. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City
Secretary to attest. This Ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect on
September 1, 2023 in accordance with the provisions of the City Charter of the City of
Georgetown.
PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the elIx- of 2023.
PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the n-. 2023.
Signatures on Following Page —
Ordinance Number: I 3 -4y Page 2 of 3
Description: 881h Legislature UDC Update, Omnibus
Date Approved: August 22, 2023
ATTEST:
Robyn D smore, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
S yo ass n, City Attorney
OF GEORGETOWN
Mayor
Ordinance Number: Zo23 - 4y Page 3 of 3
Description: 8811 Legislature UDC Update, Omnibus
Date Approved: August 22, 2023
Exhibit A
- UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
Chapter 2 REVIEW AUTHORITY
Chapter 2 REVIEW AUTHORITY
SECTION 2.01. GENERAL
Sec. 2.01.010. Purpose.
This chapter establishes review authority under this Unified Development Code. Specific requirements for each
type of application or permit are described in Chapter 3. The submittal contents of each application are set forth in
the UDC Development Manual.
Sec. 2.01.020. Summary of Review Authority.
The following table summarizes the decision -making authority of each review body for the City. Each body or
official responsible for final action on an item shall be considered the final action authority for the purposes of this
code.
Table 2.01.020: Summary of Review Authority
Application
Planning
Building
Dev
Landscape
Historic
HARC
ZBA
P&Z
City
Director
Official
Engineer
Planner
Preservation
Council
Officer
Administrative
FA
A
Certificate of
Appropriateness
Administrative
FA
R
R
A *
A
Exception
Administrative Plat
FA
R
R
A
(minor or amend
Plat)
Annexation
R
<FA>
Appeal of
<FA>
Administrative
Decision
Artificial Turf
FA
R
R
R
Comprehensive
R
<R>
<FA>
Plan Amendment
Conservation
FA
R
Subdivision Site
Analysis Map
Construction Plans
FA
R
A
Courthouse View
FA
A
Height
Determination
Courthouse View
FA
Waiver
Development
R
<R>
<FA>
Agreement
Driveway Permit
FA
I
A
Georgetown, Texas, Unified Development Code
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 1 of 9
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:29 [EST]
Final Plat
FA
R
R
A
HARC Exception
R
<FA>
A
(Building
Height/Setback
variations pursuant
to Section 4.08)
Heritage Tree
FA
R
R
A
Protection
Priority
Heritage Tree
FA
R
R
Protection
Priority
Heritage Tree
A
FA
Pruning Permit
Heritage Tree
FA
A
Removal
Historic Landmark
R
<R>
<FA>
Designation
Historic Overlay
R
R
<R>
<R>
<FA>
District
Designation
License to Encroach
FA
A
Master Sign Plan
FA
A
Master Sign Plan in
FA
A
a historic overlay
district
Minor or Final Plat
FA
R
A
w/Waiver
Preliminary Plat
FA
R
A
Rezoning (Zoning
R
R
FA
Map Amendment)
Sign Permit
FA
A
Site Development
FA
R
R
A
Plan
Special Exception
R
FA
Special Use Permit
R
R
FA
Stormwater Permit
R
FA
A
Subdivision
R
FA
R
A
Construction Plans
Subdivision Waiver
R
R
<FA>
A
Temporary Use
FA
A
Permit
Traffic Impact
FA
A
Analysis
UDCText
R
R
FA
Amendment
Zoning Variance
FA
r - Review or Recommendation FA -Final Action Authority A - Appeal Authority
< > - Public Hearing Administrative Exceptions related to Chapter 8 items are sent to the City Council, all others are
appealed to ZBA.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 2 of 9
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:28 [EST]
(Ord. No. 2014-103, § 3(Exh. A), 12-9-2014; Ord. No. 2015-14, § 3(Exh. A), 2-24-2015; Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh.
A), 5-12-2015; Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017; Ord. No. 2019-21, § 2(Exh. A), 4-9-2019)
Sec. 2.01.030. Conformity with Development Regulations.
Every official and employee with the City vested with the duty or authority to issue a permit, certificate, or license
under this Code may not issue a permit or license for any use, building or purpose that conflicts with any provision
of this Unified Development Code. Any permit, certificate, or license issued in conflict with the provisions of this
Code is null and void.
SECTION 2.02. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICIALS
Sec. 2.02.010. Director of Planning.
A. Appointment.
The City Manager shall appoint a Director of Planning (Director) to be the administrator of this Unified
Development Code.
B. Powers and Duties.
The Director has the following powers and duties:
1. Final Action.
The Director is responsible for taking final action on the applications and procedures as noted in the
table in Section 2.01.020, subject to the specific criteria for each procedure as described in the Code.
2. Review and Report.
The Director shall review and make either a report or recommendation to the Zoning Board of
Adjustment, Planning and Zoning Commission, or City Council on the applications as noted in the table
in Section 2.01.020 of this Code, subject to the terms and conditions set forth for such procedures in
this Code.
3. Additional Duties.
The Director shall have the following additional duties:
a. To comply with any other duty or responsibility clearly assigned to the Director elsewhere in this
Code;
b. To ensure conformance with all provisions of this Code;
C. To meet with potential applicants in Pre -Application Conferences as described in this Code; and
d. To act and serve as staff for each review body appointed by this Code.
4. Delegation.
The Director may delegate any duties to members of the Planning and Development Department staff.
Such designation authorizes the staff member to act on the Director's behalf, but does not relieve the
Director of overall responsibility for any final action, report, recommendation or additional duty
described in this Code.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 3 of 9
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:28 [EST]
C. Compliance with Rules and Procedures.
1. The Director shall comply with any specific procedures described in this Code.
2. The Director may develop a manual consisting of administrative rules, submittal requirements for all
case types, or additional procedures to clarify implementation of this Code, providing that additional
rules, requirements, or procedures do not violate any other provisions of this Code. The Director may
include in the manual a submittal calendar specifying the dates on which the City will accept
applications.
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015; Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, adopted February 28, 2017, changed the title of Section 2.02.010 from
"Director of Planning and Development Department (Director)" to "Director of Planning." The historical
notation has been preserved for reference purposes.
Sec. 2.02.020. Development Engineer.
A. Designation.
The City Manager shall appoint a Development Engineer to function as described in this Code. The
Development Engineer must be an engineer licensed by the State of Texas. For the purposes of this Code, the
Development Engineer is also designated as the Drainage Engineer.
B. Powers and Duties.
The Development Engineer shall review and make reports to the Director or other final action authorities on
all Site Plans and plats, and shall have final authority for approving applications as noted in 2.01.020 of this
Code, and as may otherwise be authorized by this Code.
C. Compliance with Rules and Procedures.
The Development Engineer shall comply with any specific procedures or technical criteria described in
this Code.
The Development Engineer shall develop additional procedures or technical criteria to clarify
implementation of this Code, providing that additional procedures do not violate any other provisions
of this Code.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 2.02.030. Reserved.
Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, adopted February 28, 2017, repealed the former Section 2.02.030 in its
entirety, which pertained to the Drainage Engineer, and derived from original codification.
Sec. 2.02.040. Building Official.
A. Designation.
In addition to the powers granted to the Building Official in Chapter 2.32 of the City Code of Ordinances, the
City Manager shall designate the Building Official for the City of Georgetown to review and approve sign
permits, certificates of occupancy, conditional certificates of occupancy, temporary certificates of occupancy,
Temporary Use Permits, sign permits, and Master Sign Plans. This section does not restrict the powers and
duties of the Building Official granted or assigned by other sections of the City's Code of Ordinances.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 4 of 9
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:28 [EST]
Powers and Duties.
The Building Official shall be responsible for taking final action on certificates of occupancy, conditional
certificates of occupancy, temporary certificates of occupancy, sign permits, Temporary Use Permits, and
Master Sign Plans.
C. Inspectors.
The City's Building Inspectors are authorized designees of the Building Official.
D. Code Enforcement Officers.
The City's Code Enforcement Officers are authorized designees of the Building Official.
Sec. 2.02.050. Landscape Planner.
A. Designation.
The Director shall appoint an Landscape Planner to function as described in this Code. The Landscape Planner
must be a certified arborist as recognized by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA). This designation,
and the powers and duties herein, shall apply to all references to "Urban Forester" within this Code.
B. Powers and Duties.
The duties of the Landscape Planner shall include, but are not limited to, the review and recommendation on
plats, Site Plans and other development permits requiring compliance with applicable sections of Chapter 8
("Tree Preservation, Landscaping, and Fencing") governing the placement, replacement, maintenance,
and/or preservation of trees: and, providing recommendations on such to the relevant Final Action Authority
in accordance with Section 2.01.020 if this Code.
Sec. 2.02.060. Historic Preservation Officer.
A. Designation.
The Director may designate a Historic Preservation Officer to function as described in this Code.
B. Powers and Duties.
The duties of the Historic Preservation Officer shall include, but are not limited to:
1. Providing review, report and recommendation to the Historic and Architectural Review Commission
(HARC) regarding Certificates of Appropriateness and any other provisions of this Code requiring action
by HARC;
2. Reviewing and taking final action on Administrative Certificates of Appropriateness;
3. Reviewing and taking final action on Alternative Parking Plans in a Historic Overlay District; and
4. Coordinating local historic preservation efforts with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), the
National Park Service (NPS), and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) in compliance
with the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, TAC Chapter 15.6. as amended and
any additional federal and state enabling legislation.
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015; Ord. No. 2019-21, § 2(Exh. A), 4-9-2019)
SECTION 2.03. HISTORIC AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION (HARC)
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 5 of 9
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:28 [EST]
Sec. 2.03.010. Powers and Duties.
The Historic and Architectural Review Commission (HARC) has the following powers and duties as described in this
Code:
A. Final Action.
The HARC shall be responsible for hearing and taking final action on the following procedures
described in this Code:
1. Certificate of Appropriateness;
2. HARC Exceptions on building height and setback variations pursuant to Section 4.08 of this Code;
and
3. Hear and take final action on an appeal of an administrative Certificate of Appropriateness.
B. Review and Recommendation.
The HARC shall review and make recommendations to the City Council on the designation of Historic
Overlay Districts and Historic Landmarks, subject to the terms and conditions set forth for the
procedure in this Code.
C. Additional Duties.
The HARC has the following additional duties:
1. To act and assist the City Council in formulating design guidelines and other supplemental materials
relevant to historic preservation or design review; and
2. To render advice and guidance, upon request of the property owner or occupant, on new
construction or the restoration, alteration, or maintenance of any building or structure within a
Historic Overlay District or designated as a Historic Landmark.
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015; Ord. No. 2019-21, § 2(Exh. A), 4-9-2019)
Sec. 2.03.020. Membership.
The HARC shall be constituted and conduct all activities in accordance with Texas Local Government Code ch. 214,
the City Charter, and Chapter 2 of the City's Code of Ordinances.
SECTION 2.04. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (ZBA)
Sec. 2.04.010. Powers and Duties.
Pursuant to Texas Local Government Code § 211.009, the Zoning Board of Adjustment may:
A. Hear and decide an appeal that alleges error in an order, requirement, decision or determination made
by an Administrative Official (see Section 2.02) in the enforcement of this Code;
B. Hear and decide Special Exceptions when this Code requires the Board to do so; and
C. Authorize in specific cases a Variance from the zoning requirements of this Code if the Variance is not
contrary to the public interest and, due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of this ordinance
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 6 of 9
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:29 [EST]
would result in unnecessary hardship, and so that the spirit of the ordinance is observed and
substantial justice is done.
Sec. 2.04.020. Membership.
The Zoning Board of Adjustment shall be constituted and conduct all activities in accordance with the City Charter,
and Chapter 2 of the City's Code of Ordinances.
Sec. 2.04.030. General Rules for Zoning Board of Adjustment Matters.
In exercising its authority under Subsection 2.04.010.A., the Board may reverse or affirm, in whole or in part or
modify the Administrative Official's order, requirement, decision or determination from which an appeal is taken
and make the correct order, requirement, decision or determination, as provided for by Texas Local Government
Code Ch. 211.
SECTION 2.05. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (COMMISSION OR P&Z)
Sec. 2.05.010. Powers and Duties.
The Planning and Zoning Commission has the following powers and duties as described in this Code:
A. Final Action.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall be responsible for considering and taking final action on the
applications and procedures as noted in the table in Section 2.01.020
B. Review and Recommendation.
The Commission shall review and make recommendations to the City Council on the following, subject
to the terms and conditions set forth for the procedure in this Code:
1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment;
2. Development Agreement;
3. Rezoning (Zoning Map Amendment);
4. Special Use Permit; and
S. UDC Text Amendment.
C. Additional Duties.
The Commission has the following additional duties:
1. Authorize a heritage tree protection priority determination pursuant to Subsection 8.02.050.B.; and
2. Hear and decide an appeal of an administrative decision on the applications and procedures as
noted in the table in Section 2.01.020
3. Hear and decide an appeal that alleges error in an order, requirement, decision or determination
made by an Administrative Official in the enforcement of Section 11.07 of this Code.
(Ord. No. 2014-103, § 3(Exh. A), 12-9-2014; Ord. No. 2015-14, § 3(Exh. A), 2-24-2015)
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 7 of 9
Created: 2023-03-27 12:0S:29 [EST]
Sec. 2.05.020. Membership.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall be constituted, have the powers and duties, and conduct all activities in
accordance with State law, the City Charter, and f the City's Code of Ordinances.
SECTION 2.06. CITY COUNCIL
The City Council shall be constituted, have the powers and duties, and conduct all activities in accordance with
Texas Local Government Code Chs. 42, 43, 211, 212, and 216, the City Charter, and the City's Code of Ordinances.
The Council shall hear and decide appeals pursuant to Table 2.01.020 and this Code.
SECTION 2.07. PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD
Sec. 2.07.010. Powers and Duties.
The Parks and Recreation Board has the following powers and duties:
A. Review and Recommendation.
The Parks and Recreation Board shall review and make recommendations to the City Council. The
Board shall make recommendation on the amount and location of parkland, credit for land in the 100-
year floodplain, and/or payment of fees -in -lieu of parkland dedication, subject to the terms and
conditions set forth in Section 13.05 ("Parkland") of this Code.
1. The Parks and Recreation Board shall provide review and recommendation for projects requiring
more than three acres of dedication or payment of fees -in -lieu of parkland dedication.
2. The Parks and Recreation Director shall provide review and recommendation for projects requiring
less than three acres of dedication or payment of fees -in -lieu of parkland dedication. The Parks
and Recreation Director may defer these projects to the Parks and Recreation Board for review
and recommendation for any reason.
SECTION 2.08. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC) ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Sec. 2.08.010. Powers and Duties.
The UDC Advisory Committee has the following powers and duties:
A. Review and Recommendation.
The UDC Advisory Committee shall review and make recommendations to the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council on the following, subject to the terms and conditions set forth for the
procedure in this Code:
(Supp. No. 11)
Review proposed or requested amendments to the Unified Development Code (UDC) other than
executive amendments which are those amendments that are nondiscretionary, mandatory, or
legislative revisions necessary to address state statutes or case laws, ratify published director
interpretations, incorporate recently approved Council ordinances, process City Council
designated emergency items, or address revisions otherwise determined necessary by legal
counsel;
Page 8 of 9
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:29 [EST]
2. Make recommendations and advise the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council on the
proposed amendments to the UDC;
3. Provide an additional forum for public participation and input regarding proposed amendments to
the UDC; and
4. Assist the general public in understanding the proposed amendments to the UDC.
(Ord. No. 2015-49, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015)
Sec. 2.08.020. Membership.
The UDC Advisory Committee shall be constituted and conduct all activities in accordance with the City Charter,
and Chapter 2 of the City's Code of Ordinances.
(Ord. No. 2015-49, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015)
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 9 of 9
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:29 [EST]
Exhibit B
- UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
Chapter 3 APPLICATIONS AND PERMITS
Chapter 3 APPLICATIONS AND PERMITS
SECTION 3.01. GENERAL
Sec. 3.01.010. Purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is to establish application procedures, internal review procedures, public notice and
hearing procedures, and review criteria for the processing of applications and actions that affect the development
and use of property subject to the jurisdiction of the City.
Sec. 3.01.020. Applicability of Case Types and Permits.
The following table shows which review Case Types and permits apply in the City and its extraterritorial
jurisdiction.
Table 3.01.020: Applicability of Case Types
City Limits
Extraterritorial
Jurisdiction
Prior to Subdivision, Platting and any Development
Annexation (Voluntary)
X
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
X
X
Rezoning (Zoning Map Amendment)
X
Historic Overlay District Designation
X
Historic Landmark Designation
X
Special Use Permit
X
Development Agreement
X
X
Subdivision and Platting of Land
Recording Plats
X
X
Preliminary Plat
X
X
Construction Plans
X
X
Plat Vacation
X
X
Subdivision Variance
X
X
Development Application Process
Site Development Plan
X
Zoning Verification Letter
X
Certification Regarding Compliance with Platting
X
X
Temporary Use Permit
X
Master Sign Plan
X
X
Certificate of Appropriateness
X
Appeal of an Administrative Decision
X
X
License to Encroach
X
X
Zoning Variance
X
Administrative Exception
X
Georgetown, Texas, Unified Development Code
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 1 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:33 [EST]
Special Exception
X
Stormwater Permit
X
X
Driveway Access Permit
X
X
Sign Permit
X
X
Courthouse View Height Determination
X
Courthouse View Corridor Waiver
I X
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015; Ord. No. 2015-48, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015; Ord. No. 2015-49, § 2(Exh. A),
9-22-2015; Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 3.01.030. Simultaneous Submission of Related Applications.
A. Submission of different applications related to the same development may be made simultaneously within
each application group listed below. Approval consideration of the different applications, however, shall
occur in the sequence as listed.
1. Policy Applications.
a. Annexation (Voluntary).
b. Development Agreement.
C. Comprehensive Plan.
d. Zoning.
e. Preliminary Plat.
Exception: A Preliminary Plat shall not be submitted until final approval of a Planned Unit
Development (PUD) zoning request.
2. Development Applications.
a. Construction Plans.
b. Final Plat.
C. Certificate of Appropriateness.
d. Site Development Plan.
3. Building Permits.
An application for a Building Permit shall not be submitted to the City until review of the first submittal
of the corresponding Site Development Plan has been completed by staff and the comments have been
forwarded to the applicant.
B. Any application submitted simultaneously is subject to approval of all other related applications. Denial,
disapproval or reconsideration of any concurrently submitted application shall stop consideration of any
related applications.
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015; Ord. No. 2015-48, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015; Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-
2017)
(Supp. No. 11)
SECTION 3.02. COMMON REVIEW ELEMENTS
Page 2 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:29 [EST]
Sec. 3.02.020. Application Forms and Fees.
The following regulations shall apply to all applications under this chapter:
A. Forms.
Application forms, submittal requirements, instructions, and fee schedule are set forth in Exhibit A of
this Code entitled "UDC Development Manual."
B. Fees.
1. Application fees shall be established and revised from time to time by the City Council.
2. All required fees shall be made payable to "The City of Georgetown."
3. An applicant who has paid the appropriate fee with an application, but who chooses to withdraw
such application prior to any notification of completeness, may be entitled to a refund of all or a
portion of the amount paid at the discretion of the Director. The application fee required for UDC
Text or Zoning Map Amendments shall not be refundable.
4. An application shall only be accepted for review if the applicant, agent or property owner has no
outstanding, undisputed fees owed to the City for the same property or other property under
their control.
Sec. 3.02.030. Application Deadline.
All applications shall be completed and submitted to the Director in accordance with a schedule established
annually by the Director. An application shall not be considered as officially submitted, accepted, or filed until it
has been determined to be complete as specified below.
Sec. 3.02.040. Determination of Application Completeness.
A. The Director or his designee, shall review each submitted application to determine if the minimum items
needed for proper review of such application are present.
A determination of whether an application is complete shall be made by the Director no more than five
working days after submittal of the application.
If the application is determined not to be complete, the Director shall notify the applicant in writing. The
notification shall attempt to list all missing or incomplete items and provide a specific period of time (no
greater than five working days) for the applicant to resubmit the material. The applicant may request an
additional meeting for explanation of the missing or incomplete items. If the application is not resubmitted
within the period specified by the Director, the application shall be deemed rejected and shall not be
accepted for filing. After an application has been rejected, the applicant shall resubmit within the time period
prescribed by the Director or the application will expire, and a new application and fee shall be required.
D. The determination of completeness shall take into account the following:
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan (for rezoning applications, only);
Any required previous approvals; and
Required submission materials and compliance with the UDC Development Manual and the City's
Construction Specifications and Standards Manual.
For the purposes of Texas Local Government Code § 212.009, an application for subdivision is considered
filed once it is determined by the Director to be accepted for consideration per Section 3.08.050
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 3 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:29 [EST]
Determination that an application is complete does not preclude any negative final action and does not
include any implied determination that the application successfully meets any review criteria.
G. If the Director determines that any request for a Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning) is not consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan, the application shall be determined to be incomplete, and shall not be filed. No
further processing may occur until the Subdivision Plat or Rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan. The City Council may approve amendments to the Comprehensive Plan in accordance with the
procedure in Section 3.04.
Sec. 3.02.050. Limit on Reapplication.
If any petition for a rezoning (zoning map amendment), plan amendment (such as to a future mobility plan,
comprehensive plan, water master plan, etc.), or any petition for an amendment to this Unified Development Code
is disapproved by the Final Action Authority, another application or petition for the same permit, approval or
amendment for the same property or any portion thereof may not be filed within a period of 90 days (or 12
months for zoning change applications) from the date of final disapproval, except with permission of the Planning
and Zoning Commission or City Council. Such reapplication must demonstrate:
A. There is a substantial change in circumstances relevant to the issues and/or facts considered during
review of the application that might reasonably affect the decision -making body's application of the
relevant review standards to the development proposed in the application;
B. New or additional information is available that was not available at the time of the review that might
reasonably affect the decision -making body's application of the relevant review standards to the
development proposed;
C. A new application is proposed to be submitted that is materially different (e.g., proposes new uses or a
substantial decrease in proposed densities and intensities) from the prior application; or
D. The final decision on the application was based on a material mistake of fact.
Sec. 3.02.060. Expiration of Application.
An accepted application for which there has been no action taken by an applicant for a period of 180 days or more
from the date of the last action shall be determined dormant and processed as withdrawn by the applicant,
causing the file to be closed. The Director shall notify the applicant in writing 30 days in advance of the pending
closure. The Director may consider extending the application if the applicant can show just cause for the delays or
there is evidence of continued communication with staff.
SECTION 3.03. PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE
Sec. 3.03.010. Provision of Public Notice.
A. Summary of Notice Required.
Notice shall be required for application review as shown in the following Table.
Table 3.03.010: Summary of Notice Requirements
Procedure
Published
Mailed
Posted
Annexation (Voluntary)
X
Appeal of Administrative Decision
X
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 4 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:29 [EST]
Certificate of Appropriateness
#
Certificate of Appropriateness for relocation,
removal or demolition, or building height,
setback or floor -to -area ratio modification
#
#
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
X
X1
Development Agreement
Historic Overlay District Designation
X
X
X
Historic Landmark Designation
X
X
X
Replat without Vacating (Texas Local
Government Code § 212.0145)
X
X
Rezoning (Zoning Map Amendment)
X
X1
X
Special Exception
X
X
X
Special Use Permit
X
X
X
Subdivision Variance
X
X
X
UDC Text Amendment
X
X1
Zoning Variance
X
X
X
Courthouse View Waiver
X
X
X
X = Notice Required
* = Notice to be determined by Development Agreement Committee per Section 3.20
# = Only applicable to Certificate of Appropriateness applications that require consideration by the
Historic and Architectural Review Commission
1= mailed notice to be provided in compliance with Local Government Code 211.007
B Published Notice.
1. A public notice shall be published at least once in a local newspaper of general circulation, as
designated by the City Council, within the City prior to the meeting. The notice shall contain the time
and place of such public meeting or hearing and a brief description of the agenda items that may be
considered or reviewed.
A published notice shall be published at least 15 days in advance of the public meeting or hearing.
Mailed Notice.
Generally.
a. A notice of Public Hearing shall be sent to owners of record of real property within 300 feet of
the boundary of the property under consideration, as determined by the most recent municipal
tax roll, and central appraisal district tax roll information.
b. A notice of Public Hearing shall be sent to home owners association and other similar
associations registered with the City and located within 300 feet of the boundary of property
under consideration.
C. A notice of Public Hearing shall be provided to each party required provided in compliance with
Local Government Code 211.007.
d. Notice of Public Hearing shall be sent by United States mail. The notice may be served by its
deposit in the municipality, properly addressed with postage paid, in United States mail at least
15 days prior to the date set for the Public Hearing or as otherwise required by the Texas Local
Government Code, as amended.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 5 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:29 [EST]
2. Special Mailed Notice Required for Certain Replats.
Replats containing any area or lot that, during the preceding five years, was limited by an interim or
permanent zoning classification to residential use for not more than two residential units per lot or in
the preceding plat was limited by deed restrictions to residential use for not more than two residential
units per lot, require mailed notice to all owners of lots that are part of the original subdivision and
located within 200 feet of the boundary of the property to be replatted, in the same manner as
prescribed in Subsection 3.03.010.C.1.c above and in accordance with Texas Local Government Code §
212.015, as amended.
3. Special Mailed Notice Required for PUD Modification.
For purposes of mailed notice, the boundary of a PUD modification shall be the boundary of any
tract of land for which PUD standards or requirements are proposed to change due to the
modification.
b. A notice of Pubic Hearing shall be provided to each party required provided in compliance with
Local Government Code 211.007.
C. In addition to the requirements of Subsection 3.03.010.C.1. above, mailed notice shall also be
provided to all owners of property within the entire PUD boundary, not otherwise notified.
D. Posted Notice.
1. Notice shall be posted in a format approved by the Director on the subject property, along rights -of -
way contiguous to the proposed development according to the following standards:
a. One sign for tracts of less than 300 feet of right-of-way frontage;
One sign at each interval of 1,000 feet; and
C. The total number of signs shall not be required to exceed a total of four signs per right-of-way.
2. Notice of application shall be posted at the project site such that it is visible from the public right-of-
way, including contact information and meeting date.
3. The applicant shall be responsible for posting and maintaining the sign on a format approved by the
Director, and for removing the sign within five days following the Public Hearing on the application.
4. Posted notice shall be posted not less than 15 days prior to the scheduled Public Hearing.
5. The notice is considered served upon receipt by the developer of the posted notice(s) in a format
approved by the Director.
E. Content of Notice.
Published or mailed notices shall contain at least the following specific information:
1. The general location of land that is the subject of the application, including a location map with the
mailed notice only;
2. The legal description or street address;
3. The substance of the application, including the type of proposed development and the current zoning
district;
4. The time, date, and location of the Public Hearing;
5. A phone number to contact the City; and
6. A statement that interested parties may appear at the Public Hearing.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 6 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:29 [EST]
F. Constructive Notice.
Minor defects in notice shall not impair the notice or invalidate proceedings pursuant to the notice if a bona
fide attempt has been made to comply with applicable notice requirements.
G. Special Hearing Notice Required for Certain Replats.
A Replat without vacation of the preceding plat must conform to the requirements of Texas Local
Government Code §§ 212.014 and 212.015.
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015; Ord. No. 2015-48, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015; Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-
2017; Ord. No. 2019-21, § 2(Exh. A), 4-9-2019; Ord. No. 2019-37 , § 2(Exh. A), 6-11-2019; Ord. No. 2022-89 , §
2(Exh. A), 11-22-2022)
Sec. 3.03.020. Required Public Hearing.
The following table identifies the types of applications requiring a Public Hearing and the review body responsible
for conducting the hearing.
Table 3.03.020: Summary of Required Public Hearing
Type of Application
HARC
Zoning Board
of
Adjustment
Planning &
Zoning
City
Council
Annexation (Voluntary)
x1
X2
Appeal of Admin. Decision
X
Certificate of Appropriateness
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
X
X
Development Agreement
X
Historic Overlay District Designation
X
X
X
Historic Landmark Designation
X
X
Replat (Resubdivision)
X
X
Rezoning (Zoning Map Amendment)
X
X
Special Exception
X
Special Use Permit
X
X
Subdivision Variance
X
UDC Text Amendment
X
X
Zoning Variance
X
Courthouse View waiver
X
X = Public Hearing Required
' = Public Hearing to be determined by Development Agreement Committee per Section 3.20.
t = Only applicable to certificate of appropriateness applications that require consideration by the Historic and
Architectural Review Commission
1= only on cases when applicant is seeking initial zoning in lieu of the initial default zoning of AG.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 7 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 22:05:29 [EST]
2= see section 3.25.020 of this code for specific requirements.
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015; Ord. No. 2015-48, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015; Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-
2017; Ord. No. 2019-21, § 2(Exh. A), 4-9-2019; Ord. No. 2022-89 , § 2(Exh. A), 11-22-2022)
Sec. 3.03.030. Conduct of Public Hearings.
A. Modification of Application at Public Hearing.
1. The applicant may agree to modify the application, including the plans and specifications submitted, in
response to questions or comments by persons appearing at the Public Hearing or to suggestions or
recommendations by the recommending or decision -making body holding the Public Hearing.
2. Unless such modifications are so substantial that the recommending or decision -making body cannot
reasonably be expected to perceive the nature and impact of the proposed changes without revised
application materials before it, the recommending or decision -making body may approve or
recommend approval of the application with the condition that the approval or recommendation of
approval will not be applicable until materials reflecting the agreed upon changes are submitted to the
Director. No application may proceed until the revisions have been made.
3. Where deemed appropriate by the decision -making body, modifications to an application may be
referred back to the recommending body for reconsideration, prior to further action by the decision -
making body.
4. Modification of an application that causes the consideration of that application to be substantially
different than that which was provided in the public notice shall require a new Public Hearing by the
recommending and decision -making bodies with new notice in accordance with Section 3.03.010. Such
modifications shall include, but not be limited to, a change to a zoning district that was not otherwise
included in the public notice and increasing the acreage of the area under consideration. Decreasing
the acreage of the area under consideration shall not cause the application to require a new Public
Hearing.
Evidence.
All findings and conclusions necessary to the permit or decision shall be based upon reliable evidence.
Competent evidence (evidence admissible in a court of law) shall be preferred whenever reasonably
available, but in no case may findings be based solely upon incompetent evidence unless competent
evidence is not reasonably available, the evidence in question appears to be particularly reliable, and the
matter at issue is not seriously disputed.
C. Record.
An audio tape recording and/or written minutes shall be made of all required Public Hearings and such
audio recordings shall be kept for two years.
All documentary evidence presented at a hearing as well as all other types of physical evidence shall be
made a part of the record and shall be kept by the City for two years.
Sec. 3.03.040. Postponement of Application.
A. Postponement of Public Hearing after Public Notice.
The applicant shall be required to pay for all re -notice fees for a scheduled and noticed Public Hearing that is
postponed at the request of the applicant.
B. Postponement of Application after Recommendation.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 8 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:0S:29 [EST]
For applications where a recommendation is required by the Planning and Zoning Commission, an applicant
may request the City Council Public Hearing to be postponed to the next regular meeting following the date
of the scheduled City Council Public Hearing. The Director may approve, for good cause shown, a
postponement of up to 30 days from the date of the scheduled City Council Public Hearing. Public notice of
the new Public Hearing shall be required in accordance with Section 3.03.010.
Sec. 3.03.050. Administrative Review Process.
Administrative reviews occur when the Director or another City employee is responsible for final action on any
application.
A. Applicability.
An administrative review shall be required for any permit or application that requires final action from
an administrative official, as described in Table 2.01.020.
B. Review Process.
Administrative reviews shall occur within the standard review periods established by the Director. The
Director or other authority responsible for final action may establish procedures necessary to ensure
compliance with this Code and State statute.
1.Initiation.
Initiation of an administrative review may be made upon:
a. Recommendation of the Director;
Recommendation of other administrative official responsible for final action on the permit
being initiated; or
C. Submission of a complete application by the property owner or their authorized agent.
2.Application.
Application must be made in a format consistent with Section 3.02.020.
3.Completeness Determination.
Upon submission of an application for any administrative review, the Director shall determine
whether the application is complete, as described in this Code.
4.Staff Review.
Once an application is determined complete, the Director or Final Action Authority shall review
the application, considering any applicable criteria for approval. The Director or Final Action
Authority may assign staff to review the application and make a report to the Director or Final
Action Authority.
C. Administrative Final Action.
Upon completion of the administrative review, the Director or other responsible Final Action Authority
shall make a final determination and notify the applicant in writing. The Director or other Final Action
Authority may take one of the following final actions:
1. Approve the application.
2. Approve the application with conditions..
3. Disapprove the application. Such disapproval must include specific reasons for disapproval.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 9 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:29 [EST]
D. Criteria for Approval —Generally.
1. An application shall be approved administratively when all of the following criteria are met:
A complete application and fee have been submitted.
b. The application and content of the application are consistent with the provisions of this
Unified Development Code, the Comprehensive Plan, and any other applicable City
regulations.
C. The application and content of the application are consistent with any administrative rules
established by the Director, and any prior written interpretations of this Code.
2. Additional criteria for approval that apply to specific administrative procedures may be provided in
the specific descriptions of those procedures in Chapter 3. An administrative procedure that does
not have specific criteria for approval shall be considered using the general criteria provided
above. All such criteria shall be published as part of the Development Manual pursuant to UDC
Section 1.11.
E. Appeals.
1. If an applicant is appealing a final action that of disapproval, only the basis for disapproval may be
appealed to the Appeal Authority as identified in the UDC Table 2.01.020.
2.. The Appeal Authority shall be the decisive body for any appeal request; no appeal of the Appeal
Authority shall be considered, except where required by State Law.
3. A person may not appeal a denial for the purpose of continuance, an extension agreed to by the
applicant and the Director or a determination that an application is not complete.
4. An Appeal of a denial of an application by a Final Action Authority shall be limited to one appeal per
instance of denial of the relevant application.
S. All appeal requests of decisions on plat type applications shall be processed in accordance with Local
Government Code 212.0093
6. The Director shall identify and publish in the Development Manual requirements for submitting
requests pursuant to this Section.
7. The Director or Development Engineer may, at their discretion, forward any application for which they
are the Final Action Authority, to the Appeal Authority for Final Action.
SECTION 3.04. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Sec. 3.04.010. Applicability.
A. For the purpose of establishing and maintaining sound, stable, and desirable development consistent with
the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, amendments to the Plan may be considered. Plan
Amendments are periodic, substantive changes that are necessary to accommodate changed or unforeseen
circumstances in a manner consistent with the public interest and in accordance with the procedures
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 10 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:29 [EST]
established in the Plan and in this section. The provisions of the section are adopted pursuant to Texas Local
Government Code ch. 213 and the City Charter.
B. Plan Amendments will not be made more than once per calendar year, except for the rare circumstance
where the City Council feels it necessary to make a change with a super -majority vote. Applications may be
made at anytime of year.
C. Amendments initiated by a property owner or their authorized agent may be considered only for
amendments to the Future Land Use Plan Map or Overall Transportation Plan Map.
Sec. 3.04.020. Review Process.
A. Initiation.
Initiation of an Amendment may be made upon:
1. Application of a property owner or their authorized agent;
2. Recommendation of the City Council;
3. Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission; or
4. Recommendation of the Director.
B. Application and Completeness Determination.
The Director is responsible for checking that a complete application has been submitted with all material
necessary for the City Council to render an informed decision.
C. Staff Review.
1. The Director shall review the application, considering any applicable criteria for approval and prepare a
report to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council.
2. The Director may establish procedures for administrative review necessary to ensure compliance with
this Code and State statutes.
3. The Director may assign staff to review the application and make a report to the Director.
4. The Director's report may include a recommendation for final action.
D. Planning and Zoning Commission Review.
Following notice in accordance with Section 3.03, the Commission shall hold a Public Hearing in accordance
with its rules and State law and make a recommendation to the City Council.
E. City Council Final Action.
1. The City Council shall hold a Public Hearing and may take final action on the proposed amendment.
2. The amendment shall become effective when approved by a super -majority vote of the City Council
and in accordance with the City Charter.
Sec. 3.04.030. Approval Criteria (Comprehensive Plan Amendment).
A. The City Council shall consider the following approval criteria in an analysis of immediate needs and
consideration of the long -terms effects.
1. The application is complete and the information contained within the application is sufficient and
correct enough to allow adequate review and final action; and
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 11 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:29 [EST]
The Amendment promotes the health, safety or general welfare of the City and the safe orderly, and
healthful development of the City.
B. In considering Amendments to the Plan, the City should be guided by the following:
1. The need for the proposed change;
2. The effect of the proposed change on the need for City services and facilities;
3. The compatibility of the proposed change with the existing uses and development patterns of nearby
property and with the character of the neighborhood; and
4. The implications, if any, that the amendment may have for other parts of the Plan.
SECTION 3.05. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT AMENDMENT
Sec. 3.05.010. General.
Amendments to this Unified Development Code (UDC) may be made in order to establish and maintain sound,
stable, and desirable development within the jurisdiction of the City, to correct errors in the text or because of
changed or changing conditions in the City. All Text Amendments shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
(Ord. No. 2015-49, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015)
Sec. 3.05.020. Annual UDC Review and Amendment.
A. The UDC shall be reviewed on an annual basis as provided for within this Section. A citizen or property owner
may request at any time that a proposed text amendment be considered within the review process, in a
manner provided by the Director. The City Council shall have final approval of an amendment list identifying
those items warranting review.
B. The Director, or designee, shall prepare and the Unified Development Code Advisory Committee shall review
language addressing those items identified on the amendment list. The Unified Development Code Advisory
Committee shall hold a public hearing on the proposed amendments and forward a recommendation to the
Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council.
C. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall hold a public hearing on the proposed amendments and forward
a recommendation to the City Council.
D. The City Council shall then hold a public hearing and take final action on the proposed amendments to the
UDC.
E. All public hearings shall be scheduled in following public notice in accordance with Section 3.03 of this Code.
F. The amendment shall become effective in the manner provided by the City Charter or State Law.
(Ord. No. 2015-49, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015)
Sec. 3.05.030. UDC Amendments Outside of the Annual Review.
A. An amendment to this UDC may be processed as an executive amendment separately from the annual
review process if the amendment is nondiscretionary, mandatory, or legislative in nature and:
Is necessary in order to address state statutes or case laws;
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 12 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:29 [EST]
2. Is necessary in order to ratify a published Director interpretation;
3. Is necessary in order to incorporate recently approved Council ordinances; or
4. Addresses revisions otherwise determined necessary by legal counsel.
B On occasion, City Council may, by super -majority vote, determine that a potential revision to the UDC is an
emergency and instruct the Director to process the revision to be processed as an executive amendment
separate from the annual review process. In the same manner, City Council may consider applications from
the public requesting such emergency amendment to the UDC. Such emergency amendments should be the
exception and should only be pursued if:
1. The potential amendment is immediately necessary to protect the health, safety or general welfare of
the City and the safe, orderly, and healthful development of the City;
2. The City Council determines that waiting for the annual UDC review process is not in the best interest
of the City; and
3. The UDC does not provide other avenues to address the proposed revision.
C. An amendment under this Subsection shall be processed as follows:
1. The Director, or designee, shall prepare revised language and the Planning and Zoning Commission
shall hold a public hearing on the proposed amendment and forward a recommendation to the City
Council.
2. The City Council shall then hold a public hearing and take final action on the proposed amendments to
the UDC.
3. All public hearings shall be scheduled in following public notice in accordance with Section 3.03 of this
Code.
4. The amendment shall become effective in the manner provided by the City Charter or State Law.
(Ord. No. 2015-49, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015)
Sec. 3.05.040. Reserved.
Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 2015-49, § 2(Exh. A), adopted September 22, 2015, repealed the former Section
3.05.040 in its entirety, which pertained to the review and approval process, and derived from original
codification.
Sec. 3.05.050. Approval Criteria.
In determining whether to approve, approve with modifications or disapprove a proposed amendment, the City
Council shall consider whether the proposed amendment:
A. Promotes the health, safety or general welfare of the City and the safe, orderly, and healthful
development of the City;
B. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan;
C. Is necessary to address conditions that have changed in the City;
D. Would positively or negatively impact the environment or community; and
E. Is in conformance with other applicable Sections of the City Code.
(Ord. No. 2015-49, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015)
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 13 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:65:30 [EST]
- UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
Chapter 3 - APPLICATIONS AND PERMITS
SECTION 3.06. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT —REZONING
SECTION 3.06. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT -REZONING
Sec. 3.06.010. Applicability.
For the purpose of establishing and maintaining sound, stable, and desirable development within the territorial
limits of the City, the Official Zoning Map may be amended based upon changed or changing conditions in a
particular area, or in the City generally, or to rezone an area or extend the boundary of an existing Zoning District
or Overlay District. All amendments must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The provisions of the section
related to Rezoning are adopted pursuant to Texas Local Government Code ch. 211 and the City Charter.
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015)
Sec. 3.06.020. Review Process.
A. Initiation.
Initiation of a map amendment may be made upon:
1. Application of a property owner or their designated agent;
2. Recommendation of the City Council;
3. Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission;
4. For a historic landmark or historic overlay district designation, recommendation of the Historic and
Architectural Review Commission; or
5. Recommendation of the Director.
B. Application and Completeness Determination.
The Director is responsible for checking that a complete application has been submitted with all material
necessary for the City Council to render an informed decision.
C. Staff Review.
1. The Director shall review the application, considering any applicable criteria for approval and prepare a
report to the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Historic and Architectural Review Commission
(where applicable), and City Council.
2. The Director may establish procedures for administrative review necessary to ensure compliance with
this Code and State statutes.
3. The Director may assign staff to review the application and make a report to the Director.
4. The Director's report may include a recommendation for final action.
D. Historic and Architectural Review Commission.
When a request is made for historic landmark or historic overlay district designation, the Commission shall
hold a Public Hearing in accordance with its rules and state law, and make a recommendation to the City
Council following notice in accordance with Section 3.03.
E. Planning and Zoning Commission Review.
Georgetown, Texas, Unified Development Code
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 14 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:30 [EST]
Following notice in accordance with Section 3.03, the Commission shall hold a Public Hearing in accordance
with its rules and state law and make a recommendation to the City Council. Designation of a Historic
Landmark shall not require review and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
F. City Council Final Action.
1. The City Council shall hold a Public Hearing and may take final action on the proposed amendment.
2. The amendment shall become effective when approved by the City Council and in accordance with the
City Charter. If a proposed amendment has been recommended for disapproval by the Planning and
Zoning Commission and the Historic and Architectural Review Commission (where applicable), the
amendment may not become effective except by a three -fourths vote of all members of the City
Council.
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015)
Sec. 3.06.030. Approval Criteria (Rezoning).
The City Council shall consider the following approval criteria for zoning changes:
A. The application is complete and the information contained within the application is sufficient and
correct enough to allow adequate review and final action;
B. The zoning change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan;
C. The zoning change promotes the health, safety or general welfare of the City and the safe orderly, and
healthful development of the City;
D. The zoning change is compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and
with the character of the neighborhood; and
E. The property to be rezoned is suitable for uses permitted by the district that would be applied by the
proposed amendment.
Sec. 3.06.040. Approval Criteria (Planned Unit Development).
In addition to the zoning change criteria above, the City Council shall consider the following specific objectives and
criteria for approving the PUD:
A. Specific Objectives.
Rezoning to and development under the PUD District will be permitted only in accordance with the
following specific objectives:
1. A variety of housing types, employment opportunities, or commercial services to achieve a balanced
community;
2. An orderly and creative arrangement of all land uses with respect to each other and to the entire
community;
3. A planned and integrated comprehensive transportation system providing for a separation of
pedestrian and vehicular traffic, to include facilities such as roadways, bicycle ways, and
pedestrian walkways;
4. The provisions of cultural or recreational facilities for all segments of the community;
5. The location of general building envelopes to take maximum advantage of the natural and manmade
environment; and
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 15 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:30 [EST]
6. The staging of development in a manner which can be accommodated by the timely provision of
public utilities, facilities, and services.
Sec. 3.06.050. Approval Criteria (Overlay Districts) —Reserved.
Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), adopted May 12, 2015, amended Sections 3.06.050 and 3.06.060 in
their entirety to read as herein set out. Formerly, Sections 3.06.050 and 3.06.060 pertained to approval
criteria (Historic District Designation), and interim control during historic district consideration, respectively,
and derived from original codification.
Sec. 3.06.060. Approval Criteria (Historic Overlay Districts).
In addition to the approval criteria for zoning changes in Section 3.06.030, the City Council shall make the findings
that one or more of the following criteria for approving a Historic Overlay District is met:
A. Character, interest, or value of the structures, sites or area because of their unique role in the
development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the City, County, State or Nation;
B. Occurrence of a notable historical event at the structures, sites, or area;
C. Identification of the structures, sites, or area with a person or persons who contributed notably to the
culture and development of the City, County, State, or Nation;
D. Embodiment in multiple buildings in a site or area under consideration of distinctive elements of
architectural design, detail material, or craftsmanship related to a uniqueness to the area, or the
related distinctiveness of a craftsman, master builder or architect, or a style or innovation, including
but not limited to:
1. Scale of buildings and structures typical of the area;
2. Architectural style of the buildings and structures;
3. Architectural period of the buildings and structures;
4. Building materials typical of the area;
5. Colors and textures used in the buildings and structures typical of the area;
6. Typical relationships of buildings in the area to the street;
7. Setbacks and other physical patterns of buildings in the area;
8. Typical patterns of rooflines of buildings in the area; or
9. Typical patterns of porch and entrance treatments of buildings in the area; and
E. Archaeological value in the sense that the structures, sites, or area have produced or can be expected
to yield, based on physical evidence, information affecting knowledge of history or prehistory.
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015)
Note(s)—See editor's note at Section 3.06.050.
Sec. 3.06.070. Approval Criteria (Historic Landmark Designation).
The City Council shall make the findings that one or more of the following criteria for designating a building,
structure or site within the City limits a local Historic Landmark is met:
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 16 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:30 [EST]
A. Character, interest, or value of the building, structure or site because of its unique role in the
development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the City, County, State or Nation;
B. Occurrence of a notable historical event at the building, structure or site;
C. Identification of the building, structure or site with a person or persons who contributed notably to the
culture and development of the City, County, State, Nation, or society;
D. Distinctive elements of architectural design, detail material, or craftsmanship that make it an
established or familiar visual feature, or the related distinctiveness of a craftsman, master builder or
architect, or a style or innovation, including but not limited to:
1. Architectural style of the building or structure;
2. Architectural period of the building or structure;
3. Textures and colors of materials used in the building or structure;
4. Shape of the building or structure;
S. Roofline of the building or structure;
6. Porch and entrance treatments of the building or structure;
7. Height and mass of the building or structure; or
8. Relative proportions of the building or structure (width to height, width to depth); and
E. Archaeological value in the sense that the building, structure or site can be expected to yield, based on
physical evidence, information affecting knowledge of history or prehistory.
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015)
Sec. 3.06.080. Interim Control During Historic Landmark or Historic Overlay District
Consideration.
A. Upon deeming an application for a historic landmark or historic overlay district designation complete, no
Building Permit may be issued by the City for alteration, construction, demolition or removal of any building
or structure located within the area proposed for such designation.
B. This Building Permit hold period shall commence on the date the application for historic landmark or historic
overlay district designation is deemed complete until its final disposition by the City Council. For City initiated
requests, this Building Permit hold period shall commence on the date the resolution to initiate the request
is adopted until final disposition by the City Council.
C. The Building Permit hold period shall not apply to alterations, removal or demolition authorized by formal
action of the Building Standards Board as necessary for preservation of the public health, welfare or safety as
provided for dangerous buildings in Chapter 15 of the City Code of Ordinances.
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015)
(Supp. No. 11)
SECTION 3.07. SPECIAL USE PERMIT
Page 17 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:30 [EST]
Sec. 3.07.010. Applicability.
Special Use Permits allow for City Council approval of uses with unique or widely varying operating characteristics
or unusual site development features, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Code. Special Use
Permits may be issued only for uses that are generally compatible with other uses permitted in a zoning district,
but that require individual review of their location, design, intensity, etc. These uses and the districts where they
may be located are listed in Chapter 5. These uses may be located in districts as indicated with conditions
described in a Special Use Permit recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission and approved by the City
Council. No such use shall commence without prior approval of a Special Use Permit. A Special Use Permit includes
a conceptual site layout that after approval, serves as the conceptual site layout necessary for the basis of the final
Site Development Plan, which, if necessary, shall be required prior to obtaining any additional permits. An
approved Special Use Permit is maintained with the property, and not the property owner, renter, or lessee, and
shall be valid per the terms of Section 3.07.050. The provisions of this section related to Special Use Permits are
adopted pursuant to Texas Local Government Code ch. 211 and the City Charter.
(Ord. No. 2015-48, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015)
Sec. 3.07.020. Review Process.
A. Initiation.
Initiation of a Special Use Permit may be made upon application of a property owner or their designated
agent, following the established application processes and requirements in Chapter 3.
B. Application and Completeness Determination.
The Director is responsible for checking that a complete application has been submitted, with all material
necessary for the City Council to render an informed decision.
C. Staff Review.
1. The Director shall review the application, considering any applicable criteria for approval and prepare a
report to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council.
2. The Director may establish procedures for administrative review necessary to ensure compliance with
this Code and State statutes.
3. The Director may assign staff to review the application and make a report to the Director.
4. The Director's report may include a recommendation for final action.
D. Planning and Zoning Commission Review.
Following notice in accordance with Section 3.03, the Commission shall hold a Public Hearing in accordance
with its rules and State law and make a recommendation to the City Council.
City Council Final Action.
1. The City Council shall hold a Public Hearing, in accordance with its rules and State law, and may take
final action on the proposed Special Use Permit.
2. The Special Use Permit and any subject conditions shall become effective upon approval by the City
Council and in accordance with the City Charter.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 18 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:30 [EST]
Sec. 3.07.030. Approval Criteria.
A. A conceptual site layout for the Special Use Permit must be approved by the City Council in order to approve
issuance of a Special Use Permit.
B. The conceptual site layout must be reviewed by the Director for compliance with this Code, in accordance
with the review criteria in Subsection 3.03.040.D and include, at a minimum, the following existing and
proposed features: driveways, parking areas, entrance(s), trees, landscaping, buffering, screening, fences,
buildings and other structures, outdoor refuse containers, easements, sidewalks, street(s) names and
locations, lighting, signs, floodplain limit (general), preliminary plan for utilities, concept drainage, and site
and building dimensions.
C. In addition to the criteria for zoning changes in Section 3.06.030, the City Council may approve an application
for a Special Use Permit where it reasonably determines that there will be no significant negative impact
upon residents of surrounding property or upon the general public. The City Council shall consider the
following criteria in its review:
1. The proposed special use is not detrimental to the health, welfare, and safety of the surrounding
neighborhood or its occupants.
2. The proposed conceptual site layout, circulation plan, and design are harmonious with the character of
the surrounding area.
3. The proposed use does not negatively impact existing uses in the area and in the City through impacts
on public infrastructure such as roads, parking facilities, and water and sewer systems, and on public
services such as police and fire protection and solid waste collection and the ability of existing
infrastructure and services to adequately provide services.
4. The proposed use does not negatively impact existing uses in the area and in the City through the
creation of noise, glare, fumes, dust, smoke, vibration, fire hazard or other injurious or noxious impact.
Sec. 3.07.040. Changes to Submitted Conceptual Site Layout.
An application submitted to modify an approved conceptual site layout that was filed as part of a Special Use
Permit shall cause the Special Use Permit to be reviewed under Subsections A. and B. below. Modified conceptual
site layouts must be resubmitted to the Director for consideration.
A. The Director may determine that the modification to the conceptual site layout does not change the
basis for Special Use Permit approval and issue an approval of the modified Special Use Permit.
B. If the Director determines that the modifications to the conceptual site layout change the basis for the
initial Special Use Permit approval, the modified permit shall follow the normal review process for a
Special Use Permit.
Sec. 3.07.050. Expiration.
A Special Use Permit shall expire 24 months from the date of Council approval, unless:
A. A Site Development Plan application, if necessary, has been submitted.
A Building Permit application has been approved or, if no Building Permit is required, a Certificate of
Occupancy has been issued.
C. In the case of projects where more than one building or phase is to be built, the applicant may submit a
series of Building Permit applications. The first application must be approved within 24 months from
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 19 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:30 [EST]
the date conceptual site layout approval is granted. Each subsequent application must be submitted
within 24 months from the date of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, or equivalent, by the
Building Official for the previous phase of the development.
D. A lapse of a period greater than the periods set forth above causes the related approvals or permits to
expire and be of no further force and effect. The Director has the authority to consider a six-month
extension of the above deadlines based on extenuating circumstances. Any further action shall require
a new application and approval.
The Council's approval of the Special Use Permit specified an expiration date.
(Ord. No. 2015-48, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015)
Sec. 3.07.060. Discontinuation.
A Special Use Permit shall expire 12 months following the discontinuation of the use for which the Special Use
Permit was approved.
SECTION 3.08. SUBDIVISION OF LAND
Sec. 3.08.010. Plat Required.
A. Pursuant to the authority granted in Texas Local Government Code ch. 212 and the City Charter, prior to the
subdivision, resubdivision, assembly or development of any land within the City or its extraterritorial
jurisdiction, a subdivision plat and, where public improvements are proposed, construction plans must be
approved in accordance with this Chapter. Exemptions to these situations are found in Section 3.08.020.
B. The owner of a tract of land located within the City limits or the extraterritorial jurisdiction who divides the
tract in two or more parts to lay out a subdivision of the tract or to lay out streets, parks, or other parts of
the tract intended by the Owner to be dedicated to public use shall submit a plat of the subdivision in
accordance with this Chapter.
C. A division of a tract under this section includes a division regardless of whether it is made by using a metes
and bounds description in a deed of conveyance or in a contract for a deed, by using a contract for sale or
other executory contract to convey or by using any other method.
D. No Site Development Plan, Stormwater Permit, Building Permit, Certificate of Occupancy, or utility services
may be approved or issued for the construction or development of any parcel or tract of land unless such
property is in conformity with the provisions of this Code.
E. The division of any lot or any parcel of land by the use of metes and bounds description for the purpose of
development is prohibited.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 3.08.020. Exemptions from Required Plat.
The following situations shall not require review by the City under the subdivision provisions, but may require a
Certification Regarding Compliance with Plat Requirements per Section 3.08.030. Williamson County may still
require subdivision approval under its regulations for subdivisions located in the City's ETJ.
A. Land constituting a single tract, lot, site, or parcel for which a legal deed of record describing the
boundary of said tract, lot, site, or parcel was filed of record in the deed records of Williamson County,
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 20 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:30 [EST]
Texas, on or before May 10, 1977, provided that such parcel or tract of land has not thereafter been
subdivided into two or more parcels or tracts of land.
B. A division of land into parts greater than five acres, where each part has at least 25 feet of frontage on a
street and no part of the tracts, including right-of-way, easement, or physical improvement of any kind is
intended for public use.
C. A division of land created by order of a court of competent jurisdiction, including the probate of an
estate provided, however, that prior to construction of improvements, a plat may be required in
accordance with this Chapter.
D. Construction of additions or alterations to an existing building where no public utility extension or
public improvement is required to meet the standards of this Code for such building addition or
alterations.
E. Operation of existing cemeteries complying with all state and local laws and regulations.
F. Acquisition of land by the City, County, or State for public improvements, as defined in this Code, by
dedication, condemnation, or easement.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 3.08.030. Certification Regarding Compliance with Plat Requirements.
An application for certification of compliance with the platting requirements of this Chapter may be submitted for
an existing tract of land or proposed division of land within the City's jurisdiction, but shall be required for tracts of
land created via the exemptions outlined in Subsections 3.08.020.A—B. In compliance with Local Government
Code § 212.0115, the Director, or their designee, shall provide written determination of the following:
A. Whether a plat is required under this Chapter for the tract of land or the proposed division of land or
whether an exemption to platting under Section 3.08.020 applies; and
B. If a plat is required, whether a plat has been reviewed and approved by the applicable approving body.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 3.08.040. Plat Types.
The following table summarizes types of plats required by this Code as well as their corresponding process. Please
review to the Summary of Review Authority table in Section 2.01.020 of this Code for the decision making
authority for each plat type. When a proposed division is subject to more than one description within a plat type,
the more restrictive process is applicable.
Table 3.08.030: Plat Summary
Plat Type
Description
Public
Expiration
Hearing
Preliminary
Required when the extension
No
24 months from
Plat
of public infrastructure,
approval date unless
including public utilities and
Final Plat recorded
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 21 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:30 [EST]
roadways, is required or
within that time. Phased
proposed
Preliminary Plats expire
Preliminary Plat that includes
See
24 months from date
existing platted property
Replat
last Final Plat recorded.
Amendment to approved
No
Maintains expiration
Preliminary Plat
date of original
Preliminary Plat being
amended
Final Plat of approved
Must be recorded
Final
No
Plat
Preliminary Plat
within 24 months from
Plat with more than 4 lots,
No
approval date
but with no required or
proposed public
infrastructure
Combined Preliminary and
No
Final Plat is available when
plat that could qualify as
Minor Plat requires land or
utility dedication
Final Plat that proposes
No
qualified Minor Deviations
from the approved
Preliminary Plat
Final Plat that proposes
No
Ln
a
qualified Major Deviations
from the approved
Preliminary Plat
vFinal
°C
Plat processed
concurrently with
No
Subdivision Variance
Minor
Plat involving 4 or fewer lots
No
Must be recorded
Plat
that does not require or
within 24 months from
propose public infrastructure
approval date
or land or utility dedication
Minor Plat processed
No
concurrently with
Subdivision Variance
Replat
A resubdivision of all or part
Yes
Must be recorded
of an existing plat, involving
within 24 months from
more than 4 lots
approval date
A resubdivision of all or part
No
of an existing plat, involving
4 lots or less (non-
residential)
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 22 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:30 [EST]
A Replat involving property
Yes
that is or has been subject to
single or two-family
restrictions or zoning within
last 5 years
A Replat that is processed
No
concurrently with a
Subdivision Variance
Amended
Plat meeting the standard
No
Must be recorded
Plat
qualifications of Amended
within 24 months from
Plat (i.e. corrections to
approval date
previous plat, moving lot
line, etc.)
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 3.08.050. Submission Requirements.
The applicant shall submit the information required in the UDC Development Manual as specified in the
corresponding plat application checklist. A plat application is considered filed for the purposes of Texas Local
Government Code § 212.004(f) on the date the applicant submits the plat, along with a completed plat application
and the application fees and all required documentation prescribed by or under this Code and Texas Local
Government Code Chapter 212, subject to Section 3.02.040 of this code.. The final copy of Preliminary and
Recording Plats shall be prepared and submitted by the applicant in conformance with the UDC Development
Manual.
Sec. 3.08.060. Staff Review.
A. The Director may establish procedures for administrative review of plat applications necessary to ensure
compliance with this Code and State law.
B. The Director may assign staff to review the plat application and make a report to the Director.
C. Once the Director determines the application has been filed, the Director shall either, approve, conditionally
approve, or disapprove the application.
D. If an application is disapproved or conditionally approved, the Director shall provide the applicant a written
statement of the conditions for the conditional approval or reasons for disapproval that clearly articulates
each specific condition for the conditional approval or reason for disapproval
Sec. 3.08.070. Preliminary Plats.
A. Applicability.
Approval of a Preliminary Plat, showing the proposed layout of the subdivision, shall be required
before approval of any division of land or platting activity that requires or proposes the extension of
public infrastructure, including, but not limited to, public utilities and roadways.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 23 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:30 [EST]
2. Any Preliminary Plat that includes the further subdivision of all or part of a recorded plat that has not
otherwise been vacated, must also follow the procedures set forth for Replats as outlined in Subsection
3.08.070. D.
B. Unlawful to Record Preliminary Plat.
It shall be unlawful to cause any Preliminary Plat of land within the City limits or extraterritorial jurisdiction
of Georgetown, to be recorded with the County Clerk, except as otherwise established for a combined
Preliminary and Final Plat.
C. Approval Criteria.
1. No Preliminary Plat shall be approved without a determination that the plat conforms to the following:
a. The Plat meets or exceeds the requirements of this Unified Development Code and any
applicable local or State laws.
b. The Plat is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and any other adopted plans as they
relate to:
The City's streets, sidewalks, alleys, parks, playgrounds, and public utility facilities; and
The extension of the City or the extension, improvement or widening of its roads, taking
into account access to and extension of sewer and water mains and the instrumentalities of
public utilities.
C. Any subdivision design and improvement standards adopted by the City pursuant to Texas Local
Government Code § 212.002 or § 212.044, governing plats and subdivision of land within the
City's jurisdiction to promote the health, safety, morals or general welfare of the City and the
safe orderly, and healthful development of the City.
The tract of land subject to the application is adequately served by public improvements and
infrastructure or will be adequately served upon completion by the applicant of required
improvements.
Phasing Plan.
In lieu of recording the entirety of a proposed division of a property at one time, and therefore
constructing all public improvements required by the division at once, an applicant may propose a plan
for phasing the subdivision as follows:
a. The Phasing Plan shall indicate the boundaries and order of final platting and construction of
associated improvements.
b. Phasing Plans shall not propose more than ten phases. The Director may approve phasing in
excess of this number if the applicant can provide justification for such. The number of phases
herein is exclusive of any increase in phases due to the splitting of phases as allowed per
Subsection 3.080.B.1.c.
C. Each proposed phase of a Phasing Plan for a single-family residential development shall include
at least four lots, except that lots shown on a Phasing Plan for nonresidential uses, such as lots
for parkland, neighborhood amenity centers, or commercial out lots, or any similar uses as
determined by the Director, may be shown as a single lot phase.
d. The proposed order of phasing shall follow a logical progression and, in the event subsequent
phases are not built, meet the minimum requirements of this Code, including, but not limited to,
public infrastructure, parkland dedication, connectivity, and dedication of adjacent street rights -
of -way.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 24 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:30 [EST]
Changes to a Phasing Plan shall meet the requirements of this section and follow the procedures
for such as permitted in Subsections 3.08.070.F and 3.08.080.B.1.c.
D. Responsibility for Final Action.
1. Final Action Authority, according to UDC 2.01.020, shall consider the Preliminary Plat application, the
Director's report, State law, and compliance with this Unified Development Code, and take final action.
2. The Final Action Authority shall either:
a. Approval of the Preliminary Plat;
b. Conditional approval of the Preliminary Plat; or
C. Disapprove the Preliminary Plat.
Expiration of Preliminary Plat.
1. A Preliminary Plat that is proposed to be developed in a single phase shall become null and void 24
months after its approval unless a Final Plat is recorded for all of the Preliminary Plat within that time.
2. A Preliminary Plat that includes an approved Phasing Plan shall become null and void 24 months after
its approval unless a Final Plat for the first phase is recorded within that time. The recording of a Final
Plat for the first phase of the project shall extend the expiration date for the remaining portion of the
original Preliminary Plat for a period of 24 months after the date of recordation of the Final Plat.
Recordation of each subsequent Final Plat within 24 months of the date of recordation of the
preceding Final Plat shall extend the expiration date for the portion of the original Preliminary Plat for
which no Final Plats have been approved for an additional 24 months from the date of recordation of
such Final Plat.
a. Each 24-month extension period for the expiration of the original Preliminary Plat runs from the
date of the latest Final Plat recordation. Extension periods are not cumulative.
b. If a Final Plat is not recorded during the 24-month extension period, the approval of the original
portion of the Preliminary Plat that has not been recorded, together with any unrecorded Final
Plat applications, lapses.
Changes to Approved Preliminary Plats.
Changes to an approved Preliminary Plat that do not otherwise qualify as a deviation to the approved
Preliminary Plat as defined in Subsection 3.08.080.B.1.c, shall be processed as either an amendment to the
original Preliminary Plat or as a new Preliminary Plat application as follows:
1. Changes to a Preliminary Plat may be processed as an amendment to the original Preliminary Plat if:
a. The proposed amendment does not alter the purpose and intent of the original Preliminary Plat
(i.e., commercial subdivision, single-family residential large lot subdivision);
b. The general design and layout of the original Preliminary Plat is maintained;
C. The proposed development density does not substantially increase or decrease; and
d. The amendment does not propose the removal or addition of an arterial level roadway.
2. The Director shall review the proposed changes, including any changes to the Phasing Plan, in the same
manner prescribed for the original Preliminary Plat approval.
3. The Final Action Authority shall consider and take final action on an amendment to a Preliminary Plat in
the same manner prescribed for the original Preliminary Plat approval.
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:30 [EST]
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 25 of 81
Approval of a Preliminary Plat amendment shall not cause the expiration date established with the
original Preliminary Plat approval to be extended.
5. The development regulations in effect for the original Preliminary Plat approval shall be applicable to
the Preliminary Plat amendments.
6. All other changes to an approved Preliminary Plat that do not meet the provisions of this section, as
determined by the Director, shall require submittal and approval of a new Preliminary Plat application
(including new fees, new review process, new approval dates, etc.).
Sec. 3.08.080. Recording Plats.
Recording Plats are those Subdivision Plats that are to be a document of legal record and include Final Plats, Minor
Plats, Replats, and Amending Plats.
A. Approval of Recording Plats.
Recording plats shall be processed in accordance with 3.03.050.0 of this code. Final Action Authority
shall be as noted in 2.01.020 of this Code..
Final Plats.
1.Applicability.
(Supp. No. 11)
Final Plats are technically complete, recordable versions of an already approved Preliminary Plat.
Except as otherwise noted within this section, no Final Plat may be considered or approved
unless the Preliminary Plat for the same land has been approved and has not expired and the
Final Plat is consistent with such Preliminary Plat or revision thereof. The Final Plat must
incorporate all changes from the Preliminary Plat that were considered and approved by the
Planning and Zoning Commission or the Director. Final Plat review is used to ensure that a final
recorded plat application includes final engineering diagrams and descriptions that conform to
the Preliminary Plat and the "as -built" infrastructure on the site. Exception to these requirements
is allowed as follows:
No Public Infrastructure Proposed. A Final Plat may be approved without approval of a
Preliminary Plat for the same project if the division of land would otherwise qualify as a
Minor Plat, but proposes more than four lots. A Final Plat under this provision may not
include the dedication of land or require or propose the extension of any public
infrastructure, including, but not limited to, public utilities or roadways.
b. Combined Preliminary and Final Plat Option. Any division of land or platting activity that
requires any of the following, but would otherwise meet the definition of a Minor Plat, may
be processed as a combined Preliminary and Final Plat, subject to the criteria of this section
and Section 3.08.070.
Any utility dedication; or
Any dedication of land.
The Director shall have the authority to determine if a plat meets the criteria to be
processed as a combined Preliminary and Final Plat.
C. Deviations from the Approved Preliminary Plat.
Minor Deviations. During review of the Final Plat, the Director may consider
and approve minor deviations from what was proposed on the approved
Preliminary Plat. Deviations that affect another proposed phase of the
Preliminary Plat or that affect property off -site of the Preliminary Plat or any
Page 26 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:30 [EST]
(Supp. No. 11)
deviations that increase the density of development shall not be considered
minor. The deviations shall meet any approval criteria applicable to the
approved Preliminary Plat. A draft of the proposed changes to the Preliminary
Plat shall be provided to the Planning Department as part of the application
submission for the Final Plat. Approval by the Director of such Final Plat shall be
considered approval of the amendments to the Preliminary Plat and shall cause
an updated final copy of the Preliminary Plat to be provided to the Planning
Department prior to recordation of the Final Plat. The Director may, at their
discretion, choose to send proposed deviations to the Planning and Zoning
Commission for their consideration and final action.
The following deviations from the Preliminary Plat may be considered minor:
(a) Adjustments in alley, local, or collector street alignments or widths that
do not affect another proposed phase of the Preliminary Plat or adjacent
property;
(b) Changes to the lot lines, sizes, or configuration provided that the total
number of lots does not increase and the changes do not affect approved
infrastructure;
(c) Decreases in the number of lots by up to ten percent (10%) or one lot,
whichever is greater, provided any minimum density requirements
continue to be met, if applicable;
(d) The splitting of a proposed phase of the Preliminary Plat into two phases
if the separation does not affect access or utilities to a later phase;
(e) The combining of adjacent proposed phases of the Preliminary Plat;
(f) A change in the order of adjacent phases of the Preliminary Plat, provided
adequate public infrastructure is available and is maintained for
subsequent phases; and
(g) Other similar changes as determined by Director.
ii. Major Deviations from the Approved Preliminary Plat. The deviations shall
meet any approval criteria applicable to the approved Preliminary Plat. A draft
of the proposed changes to the Preliminary Plat shall be provided to the
Planning Department as part of the application submission for the Final Plat.
Approval of such Final Plat shall be considered approval of the amendments to
the Preliminary Plat and shall cause an updated final copy of the Preliminary
Plat to be provided to the Planning Department prior to recordation of the Final
Plat.
The following deviations from the Preliminary Plat are considered major:
(a) Adjustments in arterial roadway alignments or widths that do not affect
another proposed phase of the Preliminary Plat or property off -site;
(b) Adjustments to lot lines, sizes, or configurations that do not increase or
decrease the total number of lots by more than ten percent (10%) or one
lot, whichever is greater;
(c) Modification to proposed parkland;
Page 27 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:30 [EST]
(d) Changes in the location of the boundary line of a phase of the Preliminary
Plat to include part of another phase, provided no change in the layout of
the streets and lots of adjacent phases is required;
(e) Reordering of proposed phases of the preliminary plan, provided
adequate public infrastructure is maintained and the reordering does not
affect planned infrastructure off -site; and
(f) Other similar changes as determined by Director.
iii. All Other Changes. All other changes that affect property off -site of the
Preliminary Plat, or otherwise do not fall within the limitations herein, shall not
be processed as deviations and shall follow the procedures of Subsection
3.08.070. F.
iv. Determination. The Director shall make a determination of whether proposed
deviations are deemed to be minor or major.
2.Approval Criteria.
A Final Plat shall not be considered for final action until the Director has determined the
following:
a. The Final Plat is acceptable for consideration, meaning the application is complete and the
information contained within the application is correct and sufficient to allow adequate
consideration and final action.
b. The Final Plat is consistent with an approved Preliminary Plat, except as provided for in
Subsection 3.08.080.13.1.
C. The Final Plat is consistent with any City -approved Construction Plans for any required or
agreed improvements.
d. The Final Plat meets any subdivision design and improvement standards adopted by the
City pursuant to Texas Local Government Code § 212.002 , governing plats and subdivision
of land within the City's jurisdiction to promote the health, safety, morals, or general
welfare of the City and the safe, orderly, and healthful development of the City.
e. The tract of land subject to the application is adequately served by public improvements
and infrastructure, including water and wastewater, or will be adequately served upon
completion by the applicant of required improvements.
C. Minor Plats.
1.Applicability.
A Minor Plat is a plat for four or fewer lots fronting on an existing street and not requiring
the creation of any new street or the extension of municipal facilities and not otherwise
considered a Replat or Amending Plat.
Any plat that requires public improvements per this Unified Development Code, any utility
dedication or any dedication of land shall not be processed as a Minor Plat and shall be
processed in accordance with Section 3.08.070 or 3.08.080.B.1.b as applicable.
2.Approval Criteria.
(Supp. No. 11)
A Minor Plat shall not be considered for final action until the Director has determined the
following:
Page 28 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:30 [EST]
The Minor Plat is acceptable for consideration, meaning the application is complete and
the information contained within the application is correct and sufficient to allow adequate
consideration and final action.
b. The plat meets or exceeds the requirements of this Unified Development Code and any
applicable State or local laws.
C. The plat is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and any other adopted plans as
they relate to:
The City's streets, sidewalks, alleys, parks, playgrounds, and public utility
facilities; and
The extension, improvement, or widening of City roads, taking into account
access to and extension of sewer and water mains and the instrumentality of
public utilities.
The plat meets any subdivision design and improvement standards adopted by the City
pursuant to Texas Local Government Code § 212.002 , governing plats and subdivision of
land within the City's jurisdiction to promote the health, safety, morals, or general welfare
of the City and the safe, orderly and healthful development of the City.
e. The tract of land subject to the application is adequately served by public improvements
and infrastructure.
A Subdivision Variance may be requested as a companion application to the consideration
of a Minor Plat, according to the provisions detailed in Section 3.22 of this Code. The
Subdivision Variance and the Minor Plat shall be required to be approved by P&Z.
D. Replats.
1.Applicability.
A property owner who proposes to further subdivide all or part of a recorded plat, without first
vacating that plat, must obtain approval for a Replat as outlined in the procedures prescribed for
the resubdivision of land under these regulations and Texas Local Government Code ch. 212.
2.Approval Criteria.
(Supp. No. 11)
A Replat shall not be considered for final action until the Director has determined the following:
The Replat is acceptable for consideration, meaning the application is complete and the
information contained within the application is correct and sufficient to allow adequate
consideration and final action.
b. The plat meets or exceeds the requirements of this Unified Development Code and any
applicable State or local laws.
C. The plat is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and any other adopted plans as
they relate to:
The City's current and future streets, sidewalks, alleys, parks, playgrounds, and
public utility facilities; and
The extension, improvement, or widening of City roads, taking into account
access to and extension of sewer and water mains and the instrumentality of
public utilities.
The plat meets any subdivision design and improvement standards adopted by the City
pursuant to Texas Local Government Code § 212.002 or § 212.044, governing plats and
Page 29 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:30 [EST]
subdivision of land within the City's jurisdiction to promote the health, safety, morals, or
general welfare of the City and the safe, orderly, and healthful development of the City.
e. The tract of land subject to the application is adequately served by public improvements
and infrastructure.
A Subdivision Variance may be requested as a companion application to the consideration
of a Replat, according to the provisions detailed in Section 3.22 of this Code. The
Subdivision Variance and the Replat shall be required to be approved by P&Z.
g. A Replat may not amend or remove any covenants or restrictions and is controlling over
the preceding plat.
3.Responsibility for Final Action.
Final Action Authority shall be as noted in 2.01.020 of this Code.
4.Additional Requirements for Certain Replats.
Replats containing any area or lot that, during the preceding five years, was limited by an interim
or permanent zoning classification to residential use for not more than two residential units per
lot or in the preceding plat was limited by deed restrictions to residential use for not more than
two residential units per lot, require compliance with Texas Local Government Code § 212.015
and shall meet the additional requirements outlined below.
a. Written notice of the Public Hearing required in Subsection 3. above shall be mailed, in
accordance with Subsection 3.03.010.C, no less than 15 days prior to the Public Hearing, to
all owners of lots that are part of the original subdivision and located within 200 feet of the
boundary of the property to be replatted.
b. If the Replat application is accompanied by a Subdividion Variance application, per Section
3.22, and is legally protested in accordance with this section, approval of the Replat shall
require the affirmative vote of at least three -fourths of the voting members of the
Commission present at the meeting. For purposes of this section, a protest is legal if it is
made in writing and signed by the owners of at least 20 percent (20%) of the area of the
lots or land (including streets and alleys) that was subject to the written notification
required above and filed with the Commission prior to the close of the Public Hearing on
the Replat.
Amending Plats.
1.Applicability.
An Amending Plat is any plat meeting the definition in Texas Local Government Code § 212.016.
2.Approval Criteria.
(Supp. No. 11)
An Amending Plat shall not be considered for final action until the Director has determined the
following:
a. The Amending Plat is acceptable for consideration, meaning the application is complete
and the information contained within the application is correct and sufficient to allow
adequate consideration and final action.
b. The plat meets the requirements of Texas Local Government Code § 212.016.
C. The plat meets or exceeds the requirements of this Unified Development Code and any
applicable State law.
d. The plat is consistent with the recorded subdivision it is amending.
Page 30 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:0S:30 [EST]
Recordation Requirements for Recording Plats.
1. The Recording Plat is the instrument to be recorded in the Office of the County Clerk when all
requirements have been met. The plat is ready for recordation only after the following has
occurred:
a. The Director or the Planning and Zoning Commission has approved the plat;
b. For Final Plats, the Development Engineer has approved the Construction Plans;
C. For Final Plats, the subdivider has either filed a "financial guarantee of performance" or
completed required construction of infrastructure and public improvements;
d. The Director or the Chair and Secretary of the Planning and Zoning Commission have
signed the plat; and
e. Support documentation as required by the County Clerk's office for plat recordation has
been provided to the Planning Department, including the filing fees.
2. The subdivider shall be responsible for paying all record filing fees.
G. Expiration of Recording Plats.
An approved Recording Plat that has not been filed in the appropriate records of Williamson County
within 24 months of its approval shall expire and be considered null and void.
Vacation of Recorded Plat.
In accordance with Texas Local Government Code § 212.013, after a plat has been recorded with the
County, the plat or any portion of the plat may be vacated by application of all the owners of property
within the original plat in the same manner as would be currently prescribed under this Code for
approval of the original plat (i.e. Administrative, Public Hearing required, etc.).
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 3.08.090. Extension of Approved Subdivision Plats.
A. Prior to expiration of an approved Subdivision Plat, including Preliminary Plats and Recording Plats, an
applicant may request a one-time extension of the Subdivision Plat approval for a period of six months if the
Director determines such extension will have no negative impacts on the surrounding area and would not be
contrary to the public interest. Approval of an extension for a Final Plat that is subject to the requirement for
a Preliminary Plat may only be granted if the approval of the Preliminary Plat for such is also extended, if
applicable.
B. The Director shall have the authority to determine if a Subdivision Plat Extension meets the criteria for
processing and approval.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, adopted February 28, 2017, changed the title of Section 3.08.090 from
"Extension and Reinstatement of Approved Subdivision Plats" to "Extension of Approved Subdivision Plats."
Sec. 3.08.100. Construction Plans.
A. Applicability.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 31 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:30 [EST]
Construction Plans conforming to the City's Construction Specifications and Standards Manual and this Code
must be submitted to the Development Engineer for all existing or proposed streets, sidewalks, drainage,
and utility improvements, and any other infrastructure or public improvements that are required or
proposed to be constructed, reconstructed, improved or modified to serve the development. Where the
Final Plat is for property being developed in phases, the required Construction Plans must include the
improvements specified in the Preliminary Plat to serve the phase being platted. The Construction Plans are
intended to provide detailed engineering drawings for all improvements required to serve the development.
The Construction Plans shall be kept as a permanent record of the City.
B. Construction or Financing of Public Improvements.
1. After approval of a Preliminary Plat or Preliminary Final Plat, the subdivider shall notify the
Development Engineer as to the construction procedure the subdivider proposes to follow. One of the
following procedures shall be used:
The subdivider may file Construction Plans, and, upon approval of the Construction Plans by the
Development Engineer, proceed with construction of streets, alleys, sidewalks, and utilities that
the subdivider is required to install.
b. The subdivider may elect to file a "financial guarantee of performance" as provided in Section
13.08, in which case the guarantee of performance shall be filed with the City.
2. Upon completion of construction the subdivider shall deliver to the City a two-year Maintenance Bond
for guarantee of workmanship and materials as provided in Section 13.09.
A conditional construction permit for a model home may be issued once the streets to the subdivision
have been constructed to sub -grade and water service and a fire hydrant are located within 500 feet of
the lot on which the model home is located. The Building Official shall note on the permit that the
property owner accepts all responsibility for commencing construction prior to completion of the
public improvements and City acceptance of the subdivision. The Certificate of Occupancy for the
model home will not be issued until the subdivision and all public improvements have been accepted
by the City, a Final Plat has been filed with the County and all utilities are connected to the home.
4. The construction documents, when duly signed by the Development Engineer, are authority to proceed
with the construction of streets and utilities.
Responsibility of Subdivider's Engineer.
The professional engineer representing the subdivider is responsible for the accuracy, completeness, and
conformance to the City's Construction Specifications and Standards Manual, this Code and all applicable City
standards. The City has no project design or engineering responsibility.
D. Approval Criteria.
The purpose of the Development Engineer's review is to ensure conformance to City policies and standards.
However, the Development Engineer's review is limited to facts as presented on submitted plans.
1. The Development Engineer shall approve Construction Plans that are submitted and sufficiently show
compliance with any City -approved or adopted design or construction criteria manuals or in the
absence of City -approved or adopted design requirements, standard engineering practices.
2. The City reserves the right to require corrections to actual conditions in the field that are found to be
contrary to or omitted from submitted plans.
3. The Development Engineer shall not approve Construction Plans that do not adequately represent
construction of the approved infrastructure and public improvements included in the approved
Preliminary Plat or Preliminary Final Plat.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 32 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:30 [EST]
4. Construction Plans shall not be approved until an Electric Utility Services Availability Letter, as defined
in this Code, has been submitted to the City.
E. Responsibility for Final Action.
Final Action Authority shall be as noted in 2.01.020.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017; Ord. No. 2020-40 , § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2020)
SECTION 3.09. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANT
Sec. 3.09.010. Applicability.
A. An approved, valid Site Development Plan is required prior to the construction, expansion, or removal of any
improvements to a property, as defined in Section 16.2 of this Code and including driveways, sidewalks,
drainage structures and utility improvements, within the City's limits, except as follows:
1. Single-family and Two-family structures, accessory structures, and fences on individually platted lots;
and
2. Agricultural buildings for the purposes of farming, ranching or sheltering of animals.
B. All improvements reflected on approved Site Development Plans must be constructed at the time of
development. All terms and conditions of Site Development Plan approval must be met at the time of
development.
C. The Site Development Plan may not be approved unless the lot on which the improvements are proposed is
legally platted or the subject tract is determined to be exempt from the platting requirements of Section
3.08.
D. Where Site Development Plan approval is required, no Building Permit approval shall be issued and no site
construction shall be allowed until such property has received final Site Development Plan approval and is in
conformity with the provision of this Code except through a Grading Permit. A Grading Permit, processed
and reviewed with the Site Development Plan, may be considered by the Development Engineer for
vegetation clearing and site grading. Such a permit may be issued at the discretion of the Development
Engineer for specific activities such as understory removal and rough grading, and shall not include removal
of protected trees, utility work, paving or foundation. The Development Engineer may revoke the permit and
issue a stop -work order if non -compliant.
E. The provisions of this Section relating to Site Development Plans are adopted in accordance with the Texas
Local Government Code ch. 211 and the City Charter.
(Ord. No. 2015-48, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015; Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 3.09.020. Review Process.
Review of a Site Development Plan shall follow the procedures set forth in Section 3.03.040 for administrative
review and shall be processed as follows:
'Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 2015-48, § 2(Exh. A), adopted September 22, 2015, amended Section 3.09 in its entirety
to read as herein set out. Formerly, Section 3.09, §§ 3.09.010-3.09.100, pertained to Site Plans, and derived
from original codification.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 33 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:30 [EST]
A. Application Completeness.
1. The applicant shall submit all of the information required in the UDC Development Manual as
specified on the Site Development Plan application checklist.
2. The Director shall determine that a complete application has been submitted with all material
necessary to review the Site Development Plan's conformance with applicable criteria for
approval.
B. Staff Review.
1. The Director shall review the application, considering any applicable criteria for approval, and notify
the applicant of any necessary corrections.
2. The Director may establish procedures for administrative review necessary to ensure compliance
with this Code and state statutes.
3. The Director may assign staff to review the application.
C. Responsibility for Final Action.
Final Action Authority shall be as noted in 2.01.020 of this Code.
(Ord. No. 2015-48, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015)
Sec. 3.09.030. Criteria for Approval.
A Site Development Plan shall be approved if it is in compliance with the following criteria:
A. A complete application and fee have been submitted.
B. The application and content of the application are consistent with the provisions of this Unified
Development Code, the Comprehensive Plan, and any other applicable City regulations.
C. The application and content of the application are consistent with the UDC Development Manual, City's
Construction Specifications and Standards Manual, this Code and any written interpretations of this
Code.
D. Site Development Plans may not be approved on any parcel of land not otherwise in conformance with
Section 3.08 of this Chapter.
E. Compliance with any approved plat, Development Agreement or other agreement or ordinance
governing the parcel of land to which the Site Development Plan is related.
F. Compliance with any additional Site Development Plan approval criteria required for Overlay Districts
or any Site Development Plan approval criteria adopted as part of a special area plan.
G. Prior to final approval of any plan within the City Limits, the applicant must certify to the Drainage
Engineer that all City Drainage Manual requirements for a Stormwater Permit are met by the Site
Development Plan. Approval of the Site Development Plan constitutes approval of the Stormwater
Permit.
H. The Site Development Plan shall conform to standard engineering practices and must be sealed by a
Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Texas, except as otherwise provided for in this Section.
�. The materials, embedment, and testing of all private main utility lines six inches and above in diameter
shall meet the requirements of the City's Construction Specifications and Standards Manual and/or the
approved City Building Codes.
J. Reserved.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 34 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:30 [EST)
K. An Electric Utility Services Availability Letter, as defined in this Code, has been submitted to the City.
(Ord. No. 2015-48, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015; Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017; Ord. No. 2020-40, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-
2020)
Sec. 3.09.040. Components of a Site Development Plan.
All Site Development Plans shall include the following components demonstrating compliance with the provisions
of this Code and the UDC Development Manual, unless otherwise provided for within this Section:
A. Cover Sheet;
B. Dimensional Site Plan;
C. Architectural Plan;
D. Lighting Plan;
E. Landscape Plan;
F. Tree Preservation Plan;
G. Utility Plan;
H. Grading Plan; and
I. Drainage Plan.
(Ord. No. 2015-48, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015)
Sec. 3.09.OS0. Site Development Plan Area of Development.
A Site Development Plan shall include the entire area within the legal boundaries of the tract for which it is
proposed; however, the area included in a Site Development Plan may be reduced to reflect the actual area of
development in the situations listed below. The new artificial boundary shall be the same used for all components
of the Site Development Plan and shall be scaled such that all requirements applicable to the Site Development
Plan can be met within that boundary.
A. The area of development is part of a much larger tract whereby the area encompasses less than fifty
percent (50%) of the total tract;
B. The proposed improvements are part of a larger campus where the areas are designed to function
relatively independent of each other;
C. The excluded area is to remain undeveloped and in its natural state;
D. The improvements are proposed to be added to an existing site, provided:
1. No improvements are proposed to the excluded area;
2. Review of the excluded area is not necessary for review of the area of development;
3. The improvements proposed within the area of development are not dependent on improvements
located within the excluded area; and
4. No retrofitting of existing site improvements is required pursuant to the provisions applicable to the
expansion of a nonconforming structure or site in Chapter 14; and
E. Other similar circumstances as determined by the Director.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 35 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:30 [EST]
(Ord. No. 2015-48, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015)
Sec. 3.09.060. Site Development Plan Phasing.
When development is proposed for a larger site with multiple buildings, an applicant may choose to partition the
site and construct the improvements in a series of phases as follows:
A. The Site Development Plan submittal shall include a Phasing Plan indicating the boundaries of each
phase and the order of construction of associated site improvements.
B. No Phasing Plan shall propose more than five phases or exceed a period of ten years. The Director may
approve phasing in excess of this number if the applicant can provide justification for such.
C. The proposed order of phasing shall follow a logical progression and, in the event subsequent phases
are not built, must meet the minimum requirements of this Code, including, but not limited to, parking,
landscaping, tree mitigation, fire access and stormwater management.
D. Changes to a Phasing Plan shall meet the requirements of this Section and follow the procedures
established for revisions of Site Development Plans.
(Ord. No. 2015-48, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015)
Sec. 3.09.070. Minor Site Development Plan.
Where the scope of required or proposed site improvements is limited, as herein defined, a Minor Site
Development Plan review process may be utilized subject to the provisions below.
A. Determination of Minor Site Development Plan Review.
1. A Minor Site Development Plan submittal may be considered when the extent, type or size of the
site improvements is such that review of all standard Site Development Plan components, as
identified in Section 3.09.040, is not necessary, as determined by the Director. Typical situations
qualifying for Minor Site Development Plan review may include, but not be limited to,
improvements required by Chapter 14 due to a change in use, a small addition to a building over
existing impervious coverage, installing parking lot striping on an existing parking lot,
replacement of a site's landscaping, or where only one component of a Site Development Plan, as
outlined in Section 3.09.040, is required.
2. A Minor Site Development Plan review shall not be utilized when:
(Supp. No. 11)
a. Site improvements are proposed to a property where no development has otherwise
occurred, except in unique situations as determined by the Director;
b. The proposed project requires preparation of a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA);
C. The proposed project requires preparation of a stormwater drainage study, although some
drainage information may be reviewed as part of a Minor Site Plan;
d. A new building(s) in excess of 1,000 square feet is proposed;
e. A building addition is proposed in excess of 1,000 square feet or twenty percent (20%) of
the existing building's square footage, whichever is less;
f. The intended project requires or proposes more than six parking spaces; or
g. Similar situations are proposed as determined by the Director.
Page 36 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:30 [EST]
B. Components of a Minor Site Development Plan.
The components required with a Minor Site Development Plan application shall be those determined
by the Director to be applicable to the particular situation and necessary to verify the conformance of
the proposed site improvements with the provisions of this Code. The Director may determine an
engineer is not required to prepare the plans under the Minor Site Development Plan provisions if the
proposed improvements do not warrant such.
(Ord. No. 2015-48, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015)
Sec. 3.09.080. Revisions to Approved Site Development Plans.
Any modifications to an approved Site Development Plan must be resubmitted to the Director for consideration as
follows:
A. Modifications to an approved Site Development Plan which do not substantially change the design or
nature of the original Site Development Plan and have no significant adverse impact upon neighboring
properties, the public or persons who will occupy or use the proposed development may be processed
as a Site Development Plan Amendment. An application for Site Development Plan Amendment
following the requirements of the UDC Development Manual shall be submitted to the Planning
Department identifying the requested revisions and/or modifications. Any changes approved by the
Director shall be shown on the revised Site Development Plan.
B. The Director may determine a correction or a modification is so minuscule or insignificant that it does
not warrant review of a Site Development Plan Amendment and cause the change to be directly
updated and included in the original file.
C. All other revisions or modifications to an existing Site Development Plan that do not meet the
provisions of Subsections A. or B. above shall be processed as a new Site Development Plan application.
D. Approval of a new or revised Site Development Plan application shall void the previously approved Site
Development Plan.
(Ord. No. 2015-48, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015)
Sec. 3.09.090. Expiration.
A. A Site Development Plan shall expire 24 months after the date that the Site Development Plan was approved,
unless:
1. A Building Permit application has been approved or, if no Building Permit is required, a Certificate of
Occupancy has been issued.
In case of projects where more than one building or phase is to be built, the applicant may submit a
series of Building Permit applications. The first application must be approved within 24 months from
the date Site Development Plan approval is granted. Each subsequent application must be approved
within 24 months from the date of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, conditional or otherwise, by
the Building Official for the previous phase of the development.
Except as provided for within this Section, a lapse of a period greater than those set forth above causes
the related approvals or permits to expire and be of no further force and effect. Any further action
shall require a new application and approval.
B. Site Development Plan Extension.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 37 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:30 [EST]
Prior to expiration of an approved Site Development Plan, an applicant may request a one-time extension of
the Site Development Plan approval for a period of 24 months if the Director determines such extension will
have no negative impacts on the surrounding area and would not be contrary to the public interest. A
request for Site Development Plan extension shall follow the procedures set forth for such in the UDC
Development Manual.
C. Site Development Plan Reinstatement.
In the event a Site Development Plan approval expires, an applicant may seek a one-time reinstatement of
the approved Site Development Plan, without modification, subject to the provisions below. Such
reinstatement may be granted by the Director for a period not to exceed 24 months. A request for Site
Development Plan reinstatement shall follow the procedures set forth for such in the UDC Development
Manual.
The reinstatement must be requested within 24 months of the expiration date of the approved Site
Development Plan.
The regulations applicable to the project per the Code currently in effect may not be determined to be
significantly different from those applied to the original approval of the Site Development Plan, such
that a new application for the same plan would be substantially the same.
The circumstances of the adjacent properties, roadways and subject property shall have remained the
same, so as to not change the requirements applicable to the property. Such circumstances could
include, but not be limited to, a change of zoning in the subject or adjacent properties, a change in the
boundary of the subject property, a change in classification of the adjacent roadway or neighboring
construction affecting landscape buffers.
D. The Director shall have the authority to determine if a Site Development Plan Extension or Reinstatement
meets the criteria for processing and approval.
(Ord. No. 2015-48, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015)
SECTION 3.10. ZONING VERIFICATION LETTERZ
Sec. 3.10.010. Applicability.
A Zoning Verification Letter, as defined in 3.10.020, may be obtained upon written request as outlined in the
Development Manual.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 3.10.020. Zoning Verification Letter Defined.
A Zoning Verification Letter is a letter that indicates to a property owner that a specified use, clearly identified in
the application, is permitted within the Zoning District. A Zoning Verification Letter does not authorize the
property owner to proceed with a development; does not specify requirements that must be met for future
development; and does not include a determination that a tract of land may be developed.
2Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, adopted February 28, 2017, amended Section 3.10 in its entirety to read
as herein set out. Formerly, Section 3.10 pertained to letters of regulatory compliance, and derived from
original codification.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 38 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:36 [EST]
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
SECTION 3.11. TEMPORARY USE PERMIT
Sec. 3.11.010. Applicability.
The following temporary uses may not be commenced until the applicant obtains a Temporary Use Permit from
the Building Official. The permit specifies the specific use, the period of time for which it is approved, and any
special conditions attached to the approval. The provisions of this section relating to Temporary Use Permits are
adopted in accordance with Texas Local Government Code ch. 211 and the City Charter.
The following uses may be permitted, subject to the issuance of a Temporary Use Permit:
A. Pumpkins, Christmas trees, and other seasonal product sales. No permit shall be required for such uses
operated as part of a school or place of worship.
B. Sales offices and model homes, pursuant to the standards set forth in Section 5.08.020.
C. Temporary parking lots, pursuant to the standards set forth in Section 5.08.020 and subject to
3.11.020.
D. Business offices or sales facilities where construction of a permanent facility is being diligently
completed, pursuant to the standards set forth in Section 5.08.020.
E. Construction field offices, pursuant to the standards set forth in Section 5.08.020.
F. Private farmer's markets, pursuant to the standards set forth in Section 5.08.020.
G. Temporary manufacturing of concrete products, pursuant to the standards set forth in Section
5.08.020.
H. Temporary Mobile or outdoor food vendor, pursuant to City Code Section 8.12.
I. Offsite construction staging, pursuant to the standards set forth in Section 5.08.020.
J. Portable classrooms, pursuant to the standards set forth in Section 5.08.020.
K. Temporary storage facility located on a property affected by a natural disaster, pursuant to the
standards set forth in Section 5.08.020.
L. Noise permits, pursuant to City Code Section 8.16.050.
M. Similar temporary uses which, in the opinion of the Director, are compatible with the district and
surrounding land uses.
(Ord. No. 2018-61, § 2(Exh. A), 10-9-2018)
Sec. 3.11.020. Review Process.
Review of a Temporary Use application shall follow the procedure set forth in Section 3.03.050.
The Director may determine if a Site Development Plan companion application is necessary for applications
pursuant to 3.11.010.E; and, is authorized to waive the requirement for such a companion application.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 39 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:31 [EST]
Sec. 3.11.030. Approval Criteria.
In addition to the general criteria for consideration of administrative procedures in Subsections 3.03.040.D.1., the
Director shall consider whether the application complies with the following standards:
A. Land Use Compatibility.
The Temporary Use must be compatible with the purpose and intent of this Unified Development
Code and the zoning district in which it will be located. The Temporary Use shall not impair the normal,
safe, and effective operation of a permanent use on the same site. The temporary use shall not
endanger or be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or injurious to property
or improvements in the immediate vicinity of the temporary use, given the nature of the activity, its
location on the site, and its relationship to parking and access points.
B. Compliance with Other Regulations.
A Building Permit or Temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be required, as determined by the
Building Official, before any structure used in conjunction with the Temporary Use is constructed or
modified. All structures and the site as a whole shall meet applicable Building and Fire Code standards
as well as any provisions of this Code for such Temporary Use. Upon cessation of the Temporary Event
or Use, any structures associated with the temporary use shall be promptly removed and the site shall
be returned to its previous condition (including the removal of all trash, debris, signage or other
evidence of the temporary use).
C. Duration.
The duration of the Temporary Use shall be established by the Building Official at the time of approval
of the Temporary Use Permit, pursuant to any provisions of Chapter 5 applicable to the Temporary
Use. In the event no time limit is established, the duration shall be a period not to exceed 90 days.
D. Traffic Circulation.
The Temporary Use shall not cause undue traffic congestion or accident potential, as determined by
the Development Engineer, given anticipated attendance and the design of adjacent streets,
intersections, and traffic controls.
E. Off -Street Parking.
Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Table 9.02.030.A for the Temporary Use, and it
shall not create a parking shortage for any of the other existing uses on the site.
F. Public Conveniences and Litter Control.
Adequate on -site rest room facilities may be required. Adequate on -site solid waste containers may
also be required. The applicant shall provide a written guarantee that all litter generated by the event
or use shall be removed at no expense to the City.
G. Appearance and Nuisances.
The Temporary Use shall be compatible in intensity, appearance, and operation with surrounding land
uses in the area, and it shall not unduly impair the usefulness, enjoyment, or value of adjacent property
due to the generation of excessive noise, dust, smoke, glare, spillover lighting or other forms of
environmental or visual pollution.
H. Signs.
The Building Official shall review all signage in conjunction with the issuance of the permit. Such
signage shall be in accordance with the requirements of this Code.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 40 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:31 [EST]
Other Conditions.
The Building Official may establish any additional conditions deemed necessary to ensure land use
compatibility and to minimize potential adverse impacts on nearby uses, including, but not limited to,
restrictions on hours of operation, temporary arrangements for parking and traffic circulation,
requirements for screening/buffering, and guarantees for site restoration and cleanup following the
Temporary Use.
Revocation.
The Building Official may revoke a Temporary Use Permit if it is determined that:
1. The applicant has misrepresented any material fact on his or her application or supporting materials.
2. The temporary use fails or ceases to comply with applicable standards or criteria for issuance of a
permit.
3. The operation of the temporary use violates any statute, law ordinance, or regulation.
4. The operation of the temporary use constitutes a nuisance or poses a real or potential threat to the
health, safety, or welfare of the public.
Sec. 3.11.040. Responsibility for Final Action.
The Building Official is responsible for final action on all Temporary Use Permits.
SECTION 3.12. MASTER SIGN PLAN
Sec. 3.12.010. Applicability.
A Master Sign Plan shall be required for all multiple -tenant buildings, Planned Unit Developments, and all multi -
building or multi -occupant commercial developments before any signs for such development may be erected on
the property. All owners, tenants, subtenants, and purchasers of individual units within the development shall
comply with the approved Master Sign Plan.
Sec. 3.12.020. Review Process.
A. Review of a Master Sign Plan shall follow the procedure set forth in Section 3.03.050, save and except a
Master Sign Plan for property located in a historic overlay district.
Review of a Master Sign Plan for property in a historic overlay district shall follow the procedure set forth in
Section 3.13 of this Code.
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015)
Sec. 3.12.030. Criteria for Approval.
In addition to the general review criteria in Section 3.03.050.1) or 3.13 for property in a historic overlay district, the
Building Official or Historic Preservation Officer, as applicable, shall determine the following in order to approve
the Master Sign Plan:
A. The plan provides that signs of a similar type and function within the development will have a
consistent building material;
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 41 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:31 [EST]
The plan provides for signs that meet the size limitations, location requirements, and other applicable
requirements of this Unified Development Code; and
C. Plans for property located in a historic overlay district shall be in keeping with the adopted Historic
District Design Guidelines.
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015; Ord. No. 2019-21, § 2(Exh. A), 4-9-2019; Ord. No. 2021-53 , § 5(Exh. D),
7-27-2021)
Sec. 3.12.040. Responsibility for Final Action.
A. The Building Official is responsible for final action on Master Sign Plans, save and except Master Sign Plans
for property located in a historic overlay district.
The Historic Preservation Officer is responsible for final action on Master Sign Plans for property located in a
historic overlay district.
C. A sign permit for all signs in the Master Sign Plan shall also be required in accordance with Section 3.18.
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015; Ord. No. 2019-21, § 2(Exh. A), 4-9-2019)
Sec. 3.12.050. Expiration.
A Master Sign Plan shall expire 24 months after the date that the Master Sign Plan was approved unless:
A. A Building Permit application has been approved or if no Building Permit is required, a Certificate of
Occupancy or equivalent has been issued.
B. In case of projects where more than one building or phase is to be built, the applicant may submit a
series of Building Permit applications. The first application must be approved within 12 months from
the date Site Development Plan approval is granted. Each subsequent application must be submitted
within 24 months from the date of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy by the Building Official for the
previous phase of the development.
(Ord. No. 2015-48, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015)
SECTION 3.13. CERTIFICATE OF A PPROPRIA TENESS3
Sec. 3.13.010. Applicability.
A. Pursuant to the authority granted to the City by Texas Local Government Code ch. 211 and the City Charter, a
Certificate of Appropriateness is required in accordance with7able 3.13.010 below. Activities that include
more than one project (scope of work) shall be subject to the review process and criteria for approval for
each specific project as identified in Table 3.13.010.
Table 3.13.010: Certificate of Appropriateness Required
'Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), adopted May 12, 2015, repealed and reenacted Section 3.13 in its
entirety to read as herein set out. Formerly, Section 3.13, §§ 3.13.010-3.13.110, pertained to certificates of
design compliance, and derived from original codification.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 42 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:31 [EST]
Project (Scope of Work)
Historic Significance
Decision
Making
HARC = Historic and Architectural Review Commission • HPO = Historic Preservation Officer • NR = Not Required
New Construction (Infill Development)
New building construction
All Historic Overlay Districts
HARC
Additions
Addition that creates a new, or adds to an
Historic Landmark
HARC
existing street facing facade
Contributing Historic Structure
HARC
(High and Medium Priority
Structures as identified on the
most recently adopted historic
resource survey)
Contributing Historic Structure
HPO
(Low Priority Structures as
identified on the most recently
adopted historic resource survey)
Non -Contributing Historic
HPO
Structure
Addition of a non -street facing facades
Historic Landmark
HARC
Contributing Historic Structure
HPO
Non -Contributing Historic
NR
Structure
New addition does not comply with the zoning
Historic Landmark
HARC
standards of the historic overlay district
Contributing Historic Structure
Non -Contributing Historic
Structure
Awning or canopy
Historic Landmark
HARC
Contributing Historic Structure
HARC
(High and Medium Priority
Structures as identified on the
most recently adopted historic
resource survey)`
Contributing Historic Structure
HPO
(Low Priority Structures as
identified on the most recently
adopted historic resource survey)"
Non -Contributing Historic
HPO
Structure*
Porch, patio or deck
Historic Landmark
HARC
Contributing Historic Structure
(High and Medium Priority
Structures)`
Contributing Historic Structure
HPO
(Low Priority Structures as
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 43 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:0S:31 [EST]
identified on the most recently
adopted historic resource survey)'
Non -Contributing Historic
HPO
Structure*
Reconstruction, Alterations, Changes
Restoring historic architectural features
Historic Landmark
HPO
Contributing Historic Structure`
Non -Contributing Historic
NR
Structure
Replacing a historic architectural feature with a
Historic Landmark
HARC
non -historic architectural feature±
Contributing Historic Structure
(High and Medium Priority
Structures as identified on the
most recently adopted historic
resource survey)'
Contributing Historic Structure
HPO
(Low Priority Structures as
identified on the most recently
adopted historic resource survey)"
Non -Contributing Historic
NR
Structure
Replacing roof materials with different roof
Historic Landmark
HARC
materials±
Contributing Historic Structure
HPO
Non -Contributing Historic
NR
Structure
Modifications to exterior steps, stairways and
Historic Landmark
HPO
ramps using in -kind material
Contributing Historic Structure'
Non -Contributing Historic
NR
Structure
Modifications to exterior steps, stairways and
Historic Landmark
HARC
ramps
Contributing Historic Structure
HARC
(High and Medium Priority
Structures as identified on the
most recently adopted historic
resource survey)'
Contributing Historic Structure
HPO
(Low Priority Structures as
identified on the most recently
adopted historic resource survey)'
Non -Contributing Historic
HPO
Structure'
Historic Landmark
HPO
Contributing Historic Structure*
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 44 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:31 [EST]
Paint removal from historic and significant
Non -Contributing Historic
NR
architectural features (back to original
Structure
condition; does not include repainting)
Changes to paint color on previously painted
Historic Landmark
HPO
surfaces (includes repainting or new paint on
Contributing Historic Structure`
previously painted surface)
Non -Contributing Historic
Structure'
New paint on unpainted historic and other
Historic Landmark
HPO
significant architectural features
Contributing Historic Structure"
Non -Contributing Historic
NR
Structure
Changes in color to awning fabric
Historic Landmark
HPO
Contributing Historic Structure"
Non -Contributing Historic
Structure`
Exterior lighting that is attached to the building
Historic Landmark
HPO
or structure
Contributing Historic Structure'
Non -Contributing Historic
Structure'
Rooftop HVAC, mechanical or communication
Historic Landmark'
HPO
equipment that result in no modifications to the
Contributing Historic Structure'
building facade
Non -Contributing Historic
Structure'
Rooftop HVAC, mechanical or communication
Historic Landmark
HARC
equipment that result in modifications to the
Contributing Historic Structure
building facade
(High and Medium Priority
Structures as identified on the
most recently adopted historic
resource survey)'
Contributing Historic Structure
HPO
(Low Priority Structure as identified
on the most recently adopted
historic resource survey)'
Non -Contributing Historic
HPO
Structure'
Removal, Demolition or Relocation
Awnings or canopies
Historic Landmark
HARC
Contributing Historic Structure
HARC
(High and Medium Priority
Structures as identified on the
most recently adopted historic
resource survey)'
Contributing Historic Structure
HPO
(Low Priority Structure as identified
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 45 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:31 [EST]
on the most recently adopted
historic resource survey)"
Non -Contributing Historic
Structure
NR
Exterior non -historic architectural features
Historic Landmark
HPO
Contributing Historic Structure;
Non -Contributing Historic
Structure
NR
Exterior siding to unencapsulate historic siding
materials
Historic Landmark
HPO
Contributing Historic Structure*
Non -Contributing Historic
Structure
NR
Removal, stripping, concealing, or destruction
of any historic and architectural features that is
integral to the historic character of the building
or structure, or historic overlay district
Historic Landmark
HARC
Contributing Historic Structure
(High and Medium Priority
Structures as identified on the
most recently adopted historic
resource survey)`
Contributing Historic Structure
(Low Priority Structures as
identified on the most recently
adopted historic resource survey)
HPO
Non -Contributing Historic
Structure*
HPO
Non -historic additions that are made of non-
historic materials
Historic Landmark
HPO
Contributing Historic Structure
Non -Contributing Historic
Structure
NR
Attached carport, porch, patio or deck
Historic Landmark
HARC#
Contributing Historic Structure*
Non -Contributing Historic
Structure
NR
Attached carport, porch, patio or deck made of
non -historic materials
Historic Landmark
HPO
Contributing Historic Structure'
Non -Contributing Historic
Structure
NR
Reopen enclosed porch, patio or deck to
original condition
Historic Landmark
HPO
Contributing Historic Structure'
Non -Contributing Historic
Structure
NR
Street facing facade
Historic Landmark
HARCt
Contributing Historic Structure
Non -Contributing Historic
Structure
NR
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 46 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:31 [EST]
Demolition that results in the reduction or loss
Historic Landmark
HARC
in the total square footage of the existing
Contributing Historic Structure
High Priority resources identified in
HARC
structure
the Historic Resource Survey
located outside a Historic Overlay
District
Medium Priority resources
HPO
identified in the Historic Resource
Survey located outside a Historic
Overlay District
Relocation of a building or structure on the
Historic Landmark
HPO
same lot
Contributing Historic Structure
Non -Contributing Historic
Structure
Relocation of a building or structure to a
Historic Landmark
HARC
historic overlay district (includes relocation of
Contributing Historic Structure
buildings or structures within the same historic
Non -Contributing Historic
overlay districts)
Structure
Relocation of a building or structure outside of
Historic Landmark
HARC
the historic overlay district
Contributing Historic Structure
Non -Contributing Historic
NR
Structure
Signage
Master Sign Plan
All Historic Overlay Districts
HPO
New signage, to include new signage that is
HPO
consistent with an approved Master Sign Plan
New signage that is inconsistent with an
HARC
approved Master Sign Plan or applicable
guidelines
Changes in content or configuration (re -facing)
HPO
that do not involve changes in sign location,
dimensions, lighting or total sign area
Amending an approved Master Sign Plan
HPO
Fences
New fence, railing or wall that is inconsistent
All Historic Overlay Districtst
HARC
with the overlay district's characteristics and
applicable guidelines
Miscellaneous
Exceptions on building height, setback and FAR
All Historic Overlay District
HARC
alternative standards pursuant to Section 4.08
of this Code
Renewal of an expired Certificate of
All Historic Overlay Districts
HPO
Appropriateness
Historic Landmark
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 47 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:31 [EST]
Only applicable to a street facing facade
t Only applicable to fences along a street lot line or located in a street yard
t CLG demo delay period and Demolition Subcommittee review not applicable
± Material that is intended to replace a historic material or feature that is either the same or a similar material, and the result will match
all visual aspects, including form, color, and workmanship in order to retain the original design of the structure, may be permitted by the
identified decision maker for medium and low priority resources.
B. Exemptions.
A Certificate of Appropriateness shall not be required for the following:
1. Ordinary maintenance and repair, as this term is defined in Chapter 16 of this Code.
2. Interior construction or alterations provided the alterations do not alter the exterior wall of the
building.
3. New additions to existing single-family and two-family structures provided the addition does not create
or add to a street facing facade, and the addition in combination with the existing building is in
compliance with the zoning standards of the historic overlay district.
4. New, modifications or removal of existing awnings (to include changes in color), canopies, exterior
paint color or exterior lighting that are attached to a single-family or two-family residential structure
provided the alterations do not alter the exterior wall of a building designated as a historic landmark.
5. Demolition of a building or structure that the Building Official has declared a dangerous structure in
accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the City Code, as amended, or determined that demolition is
necessary for the preservation of the public health, safety and welfare.
Should the Building Official declare a building a dangerous structure or determine that
demolition is necessary for the preservation of public health, safety and welfare, the Building
Official shall coordinate with the Historic Preservation Officer and property owner to identify
historic and significant architectural features that are unique to the building or structure, era or
district and that may be salvaged.
b. The Historic Preservation Officer shall create a record of the building or structure to be
demolished through archival -quality photo -documentation, drawings, and other information
similar to those required by the Historic American Buildings Survey. The list of identified historic
and significant architectural features to be salvaged shall also be made part of this record.
6. New fence, railing or wall that is consistent with the overlay district's characteristics and applicable
guidelines.
Site alterations and other hardscape features provided that these do not alter a building or structure
designated as a Historic Landmark or that is a contributing historic structure to the Historic Overlay
District.
C. No Building Permit shall be issued by the Building Official for any building or structure designated as a
Historic Landmark or that is located in a Historic Overlay District until the application for such permit has
been reviewed and approved by the Historic and Architectural Review Commission or the Historic
Preservation Officer, as applicable, and the project, as proposed, is in compliance with all other applicable
regulations of this Code.
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015; Ord. No. 2019-21, § 2(Exh. A), 4-9-2019)
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 48 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:31 [EST]
Sec. 3.13.020. Certificate of Appropriateness —Administrative Approval.
A. Review Process.
1. Initiation.
Initiation of a certificate of appropriateness to the Historic Preservation Officer may be made upon
application by the property owner of the affected property or their authorized agent following the
established application processes and requirements of this Chapter.
Application Completeness.
a. The applicant shall submit all of the information and materials required in the UDC Development
Manual as specified on the applicable certificate of appropriateness checklist.
b. The Historic Preservation Officer shall determine that a complete application has been submitted
with all material necessary to review the Certificate of Appropriateness' conformance with
applicable criteria for approval in accordance with this Code.
Staff Review.
Once a Certificate of Appropriateness has been initiated and the application deemed complete, the
Historic Preservation Officer shall review the application for consistency with any applicable criteria for
approval.
Responsibility for Final Action.
The Historic Preservation Officer is responsible for final action on a Certificate of Appropriateness
for certain projects as specified in Section 3.13.010 of this Code.
b. Should the Historic Preservation Officer be unable to approve the request, the Historic
Preservation Officer may forward the request to the Historic and Architectural Review
Commission for review and final action at the next available meeting following public notification
in accordance with Section 3.03 of this Code.
B. Criteria for Approval.
The Historic Preservation Officer shall determine whether to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness based on
the following criteria:
1. The application is complete and the information contained within the application is correct and
sufficient enough to allow adequate review and final action;
2. Compliance with applicable design and development standards of this Code;
3. Compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties to
the most extent practicable;
4. Compliance with the adopted Historic District Design Guidelines, as may be amended from time to
time, specific to the applicable Historic Overlay District; and
5. The overall character of the applicable Historic Overlay District and the building or structure is
preserved, and the design is compatible with the Historic Overlay District.
6. The sign is in keeping with the adopted Historic District Design Guidelines and character of the Historic
Overlay District.
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015; Ord. No. 2019-21, § 2(Exh. A), 4-9-2019; Ord. No. 2021-53 , § 6(Exh. E),
7-27-2021)
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 49 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:31 [EST]
Sec. 3.13.030. Certificate of Appropriateness— HARC Approval.
A. Review Process.
Initiation.
Initiation of a Certificate of Appropriateness to the Historic and Architectural Review Commission may
be made upon application by the property owner of the affected property or their authorized agent
following the established application processes and requirements of this Chapter.
Application Completeness.
The applicant shall submit all of the information and materials required in the UDC Development
Manual as specified on the applicable Certificate of Appropriateness checklist.
b. The Historic Preservation Officer shall determine that a complete application has been submitted
with all material necessary to review the Certificate of Appropriateness' conformance with
applicable criteria for approval in accordance with this Code.
Staff Review.
Once a Certificate of Appropriateness has been initiated and the application deemed complete,
the Historic Preservation Officer shall review the application for consistency with any applicable
criteria for approval.
b. The Historic Preservation Officer shall prepare a report to the Historic and Architectural Review
Commission.
C. The Historic Preservation Officer's report shall include a recommendation for final action.
4. Responsibility for Final Action.
The Historic and Architectural Review Commission shall review the application, the Historic
Preservation Officer's report, conduct a hearing in accordance with the Historic and Architectural
Review Commission's established procedures and State law, and take final action on the
application within 35 days of the application hearing unless the applicant agrees to extend the
time.
b. An application before the Historic and Architectural Review Commission shall be considered
approved by a majority vote of all members of the Historic and Architectural Review Commission.
B. Criteria for Approval.
The Historic and Architectural Review Commission shall determine whether to grant a Certificate of
Appropriateness based on the following criteria:
1. The application is complete and the information contained within the application is correct and
sufficient enough to allow adequate review and final action;
2. Compliance with applicable design standards of this Code;
3. Compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties to
the most extent practicable;
4. Compliance with the adopted Historic District Design Guidelines, as may be amended from time to
time, specific to the applicable Historic Overlay District;
5. The general historic, cultural, and architectural integrity of the building, structure or site is preserved;
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 50 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:31 [EST]
New buildings or additions are designed to be compatible with surrounding properties in the applicable
historic overlay district;
The overall character of the applicable historic overlay district is protected; and
The Master Sign Plan is in keeping with the adopted Historic District Design Guidelines and character of
the historic overlay district.
Additional Criteria for Approval for Building Height Modification.
Applicants requesting exceptions to the building height standards set forth in Section 4.08.020.A must
submit documentation to HARC that the following standards will be met if the requested exception to
the height standards is approved:
The proposed building or addition shall not obscure views to and from the Courthouse or
overwhelm or detract from views of the Town Square Historic District;
b. The proposed building or addition shall be compatible with the height, scale, massing, and
volume reflected in the Downtown Overlay District, and the historic character of the District; and
C. The proposed building shall be an extraordinary contribution to the aesthetic and economic goals
of the Downtown Master Plan.
The documentation required by Section 3.13.030.C.1 must include, at a minimum, the following
information:
A visual analysis that identifies:
The extent to which the building would impact views to and from the Courthouse, and to
what extent the building will be visible from four directions; and
How the building will relate to the context of the surrounding structures and the character
of the district; and
b. A summary of the conclusions of the visual analysis as to how the proposed building will impact
the District, specifically the immediate surroundings.
3. HARC may grant a request for a variation in height from the standards set forth in Section 4.08.020.A
only if it determines that the following goals or purposes will still be achieved:
a. Views to and from the Courthouse and to and from the Town Square Historic District will be
protected; and
b. The character of the Downtown Overlay District and the Town Square Historic District will be
defined, reinforced, and preserved; and
C. The relationship of the proposed project to the existing structures in the immediate vicinity
remains consistent; and
d. The proposed project allows for the best utilization of redevelopment in the Downtown Overlay
District and the Town Square Historic District; and
e. The proposed project protects the historic buildings in the Downtown Overlay District.
D. Additional Criteria for Approval of a Setback Modification.
The Historic and Architectural Review Commission may grant a Certificate of Appropriateness, per
Section 4.08.080.D of this Code, to modify the setback standards of the underlying base zoning district
for residential properties located within the Old Town Overlay District.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 51 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:31 [EST]
2. HARC may take in consideration the following in determining whether to approve a Certificate of
Appropriateness for a setback exception:
a. Whether the proposed setback encroachment is solely a matter of convenience;
b. Whether there is adequate room on the site to allow the proposed addition or new structure
without encroaching into the setback;
C. Whether the proposed setback is compatible and in context within the block in which the subject
property is located;
d. Whether the proposed addition or new structure will be set closer to the street than other units
within the block;
e. Whether the proposed structure is replacing a structure removed within the past year;
f. Whether the proposed structure will replace a structure that previously existed with relatively
the same footprint and encroachment as proposed;
g. If the proposed encroachment is for a structure that is replacing another structure, whether the
proposed structure is significantly larger than the original;
h. If the proposed encroachment is for an addition, the scale of the addition compared to the
original house;
I. The size of the proposed structure compared to similar structures within the same block;
j. Whether the proposed addition or new structure will negatively impact adjoining properties,
including limiting their ability to maintain existing buildings;
k. Whether there is adequate space for maintenance of the proposed addition or new structure
and/or any adjacent structures; and/or
Whether the encroachment would enable existing large trees or significant features of the lot to
be preserved.
Additional Requirements for Relocation, Removal or Demolition of a Historic Landmark or Contributing
Historic Structure.
In addition to the staff review process established in Section 3.13.030.A, applications for a Certificate of
Appropriateness for the relocation, removal or demolition of a building or structure designated as a Historic
Landmark or contributing historic structure shall be subject to the following additional review:
1. Demolition Delay Period Certified Local Government (CLG) Program.
Upon deeming the application complete, requests for a Certificate of Appropriateness for
demolition of a Historic Landmark or contributing historic structure shall be subject to a 60-day
demolition delay period. The Historic and Architectural Review Commission shall not take action
on a request for demolition until the 60-day demolition delay period is complete.
b. During this 60-day delay period, the applicant shall coordinate with the Historic Preservation
Officer to reach a satisfactory resolution that preserves the building or structure, or that
preserves historic and significant architectural features that are unique to the building or
structure, era or district.
C. The Historic Preservation Officer shall coordinate with local, county and other historic
organizations to explore possibilities for preserving, to include the possible relocation of the
structure.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 52 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:31 [EST]
The Historic Preservation Officer shall present the findings and resolution, if applicable, to the
Historic and Architectural Review Commission with the request.
Demolition Subcommittee Review.
a. No later than the 30th day from deeming the application complete, the Historic and Architectural
Review Commission's Demolition Subcommittee shall complete a walk-through of the building or
structure proposed to be demolished or relocated with the Historic Preservation Officer and the
applicant.
b. The Demolition Subcommittee shall review the application and analyze the building or structure
to determine possibility of preservation and restoration, and appropriateness for demolition or
relocation. In the event of demolition, the Demolition Subcommittee shall also create a list of
historic salvageable materials identified during the walk-through.
C. The Demolition Subcommittee's report shall include a recommendation for final action.
3. Responsibility of Final Action.
In addition to the application, and the Historic Preservation Officer's report the Historic and
Architectural Review Commission shall review the recommendation by the Demolition
Subcommittee, conduct a hearing in accordance with the HARC's established procedures and
state law, and take final action on the application within 35 days of the application hearing unless
the applicant agrees to extend the time.
b. As conditions of approval, the Historic and Architectural Review Commission may require historic
materials to be salvaged, archival -quality photo -documentation, and/or architectural drawings of
the building or structure proposed to be demolished or relocated similar to those required by the
Historic American Buildings Survey to be submitted to the Historic Preservation Officer.
Criteria for Approval for Relocation, Removal or Demolition of a Historic Landmark or Contributing Historic
Structure.
1. The Historic and Architectural Review Commission shall use circumstances or items that are unique to
the building or structure proposed to be relocated, removed or demolished when reviewing the
application.
2. The Historic and Architectural Review Commission shall make the following findings when considering
a request for demolition or relocation of a structure:
(Supp. No. 11)
Loss of Significance.
i. The applicant has provided information that the building or structure is no longer
historically, culturally or architecturally significant, or is no longer contributing to the
historic overlay district; and
ii. The applicant has established that the building or structure has undergone significant and
irreversible changes, which have caused the building or structure to lose the historic,
cultural or architectural significance, qualities or features which qualified the building or
structure for such designation; and
iii. The applicant has demonstrated that any changes to the building or structure were not
caused either directly or indirectly by the owner, and were not due to intentional or
negligent destruction, or lack of maintenance rising to the level of a demolition by neglect;
and
IV. Demolition or relocation of the building or structure will not cause significant adverse
effect on the historic overlay district or the City's historic resources; or
Page 53 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:31 [EST]
Unreasonable Economic Hardship.
The applicant has demonstrated that the property owner cannot take reasonable, practical
or viable measures to adaptively use, rehabilitate or restore the building or structure, or
make reasonable beneficial use of, or realize a reasonable rate of return on a building or
structure unless the building or structure may be demolished or relocated; and
ii. The applicant must prove that the structure cannot be reasonably adapted for any other
feasible use, which would result in a reasonable rate of return; or
There is a compelling public interest that justifies relocation, removal or demolition of the
structure.
Relocation of a Structure to a Historic Overlay District.
In the event the building or structure is proposed to be relocated to a property in a Historic Overlay
District, in addition to the above, the applicant must demonstrate the following with the application:
a. The architectural compatibility of the relocated building or structure with adjacent buildings
according to the applicable Historic District Design Guidelines and UDC standards for new
construction; and
b. The proposed siting, setback and other applicable site -specific treatments according to pertinent
Historic District Design Guidelines and UDC standards of the applicable historic overlay district;
and
C. Relocation will not damage existing contributing historic buildings or structures, or the character
of the Historic Overlay District.
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015; Ord. No. 2019-21, § 2(Exh. A), 4-9-2019; Ord. No. 2021-53 , § 6(Exh. E),
7-27-2021)
Sec. 3.13.040. Relocation, Removal or Demolition Prior To Approval of a Certificate of
Appropriateness.
A. Demolition, including demolition by neglect, of a building or structure prior to approval of a Certificate of
Appropriateness by the Historic and Architectural Review Commission, when required, shall be subject to an
automatic hold on all permits. No permit may be granted until this period is complete and the Historic and
Architectural Review Commission has granted a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of the
remaining building or structure, if applicable.
B. The permit delay period shall be determined by the Historic and Architectural Review Commission, but in no
case shall it exceed 365 days.
C. The Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of the remaining building or structure, if applicable,
shall be reviewed and final action taken by the Historic and Architectural Review Commission concurrently
with the determination of the longevity of the permit hold period.
D. During this delay period, the applicant shall provide the following information to the Historic Preservation
Officer:
1. Documentation regarding the original and existing condition of the building or structure, to include
structural integrity and the extent of work necessary to stabilize the building or structure.
2. Site development plan (or plot plan) identifying proposed development on site following demolition of
the building or structure.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 54 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:31 [EST]
3. List of any salvageable materials, and a plan offering donation or sale of the remaining building or
structure and any salvageable materials identified.
E. In the event of demolition by neglect, the applicant shall complete any work required to stabilize and arrest
further deterioration of the building or structure.
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015; Ord. No. 2019-21, § 2(Exh. A), 4-9-2019)
Sec. 3.13.050. Certificate and Compliance Inspections.
A. It shall be the responsibility of the Historic Preservation Officer to issue the actual Certificate of
Appropriateness following approval by the Historic Preservation Officer or the HARC, with any designated
conditions, and to maintain a copy of the Certificate of Appropriateness, together with the proposed plans.
The certificate shall be forwarded to the Building Official. These shall be public documents for all purposes.
Work performed pursuant to the issuance of a certificate of appropriateness shall conform to the
requirements of the certificate. In the event that work is not in compliance, the Building Official shall issue a
stop work order and/or citation as prescribed by ordinance.
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015; Ord. No. 2019-21, § 2(Exh. A), 4-9-2019)
Sec. 3.13.060. Limits on Resubmission.
No application for the same project shall be considered within 180 days of the rejection or disapproval by the
Historic and Architectural Review Commission or Historic Preservation Officer, as applicable, of an application. The
applicant may submit a design for an entirely new project or a revised design that substantially responds to the
reasons for denial as set forth by the Historic and Architectural Review Commission or Historic Preservation
Officer, as applicable, at any time.
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015; Ord. No. 2019-21, § 2(Exh. A), 4-9-2019)
Sec. 3.13.070. Expiration.
A. A Certificate of Appropriateness, except as noted below, expires if the work authorized by the Certificate of
Appropriateness is not commenced within 24 months from the date of the final action to approve the
request. In the case of a phased project, after the initial phase is complete or a Certificate of Occupancy has
been issued, each subsequent phase shall commence within 24 months of the completion or Certificate of
Occupancy of the prior phase. The Historic Preservation Officer may extend the time commencement of
work upon written request by the applicant.
B. A Certificate of Appropriateness for relocation, removal or demolition expires if a permit for relocation or
demolition has not been issued within 180 days or, if a permit is not required, the work authorized by the
Certificate of Appropriateness is not commenced within 180 days from the date of the final decision to
approve the request. The Historic Preservation Officer may extend the time for commencement of work
upon written request of the applicant.
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015)
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 55 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:31 [EST]
Sec. 3.13.080. Appeals.
A person aggrieved by a final action of the Historic and Architectural Review Commission on a Certificate of
Appropriateness may appeal to the City Council, pursuant to the procedures set forth below. Such appeal shall be
submitted to the Historic Preservation Officer within 30 days of the final action.
Appeals from an administratively issued Certificate of Appropriateness will be processed through the Historic and
Architectural Review Commission, subject to the procedures established for new applications and set forth below.
Such appeal shall be submitted to the Historic Preservation Officer within 30 days of the administrative action.
A. Appeal Hearing.
The hearing shall be set for the next available City Council or HARC meeting, subject to the provision of
public notification. Notification shall be provided in the same manner as the initial certificate of
appropriateness.
Burden of Proof in Appeals.
When an appeal is considered by the City Council or HARC, the final action by the original reviewing
authority is presumed to be valid. The person filing the appeal shall present sufficient evidence and
have the burden to justify a reversal of the action being appealed.
C. Findings and Conclusions.
All findings and conclusion necessary to the appeal decision shall be based upon reliable evidence.
Competent evidence (evidence admissible in a court of law) will be preferred whenever reasonably
available, but in no case may findings be based solely upon incompetent evidence unless competent
evidence is not reasonably available, the evidence in question appears to be particularly reliable, and
the matter at issue is not seriously disputed. In exercising its authority, as an appellate body the City
Council or HARC may reverse or affirm, in whole or in part the original order, requirement, decision, or
determination from which an appeal is taken and make the correct order, requirement, decision, or
determination, and for that purpose the City Council or HARC, as an appellate body, has the same
authority as the original reviewing authority.
D. Decision on Appeal.
As an appellate body the City Council or HARC shall review the application, the staff report and
meeting minutes, conduct a hearing in accordance with established procedures and state law, and take
final action on the appeal by a majority vote of City Councilmembers or members of HARC. In the event
of a tie of the City Councilmembers, the Mayor shall vote as permitted in the City Charter.
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015; Ord. No. 2019-21 , § 2(Exh. A), 4-9-2019)
SECTION 3.14. APPEAL OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION -ZONING
REGULATIONS
Sec. 3.14.010. Effect of Appeal.
Pursuant to the authority granted to the City by Texas Local Government Code ch. 211, the City Charter, the City
Council and this Code, the Zoning Board of Adjustment may hear and decide an Appeal that alleges error in an
order, requirement, decision or determination made by an administrative official in the enforcement of zoning
regulations contained in this Code.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 56 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:31 [EST]
Sec. 3.14.020. Appeal Procedures.
A. Initiation.
Within 30 days after the date of the administrative decision, any person specified by state law may appeal
an administrative decision to the Zoning Board of Adjustment. .
B. Content of Notice of Appeal.
The notice of appeal must specifically set forth all grounds for appeal.
C. Effect of Appeal.
An Appeal stays all proceedings in furtherance of the action that is appealed unless the official from whom
the Appeal is taken certifies in writing to the Board the facts supporting the official's opinion that a stay
would cause imminent peril to life or property. In that case, the proceedings may be stayed only by a
restraining order granted by the Board or a court of record, after notice to the official and if due cause is
shown.
Sec. 3.14.030. Review Criteria.
The Zoning Board of Adjustment shall consider whether the Director of Planning and Development or other
administrative official's action was appropriate considering the details of the case and the requirements contained
in this Unified Development Code. The Board or Commission will make its decision based on this Unified
Development Code and the information presented to the Board or Commission by the applicant and the Director
or other Administrative Official.
A. Appeal Hearing.
The Zoning Board of Adjustment shall set a reasonable time for hearing the Appeal and shall give
notice to the parties and to the public. Each Appeal must be heard by at least 75 percent (75%) of the
members of the Board .
B. Burden of Proof in Appeals.
When an Appeal is taken to the Zoning Board of Adjustment, the Director's or other Administrative
Official's action is presumed to be valid. The applicant shall present sufficient evidence and have the
burden to justify a reversal of the action being appealed. The Director may present evidence and
argument to the contrary.
Findings and Conclusions.
All findings and conclusions necessary to the permit or Appeal decision shall be based upon reliable
evidence. Competent evidence (evidence admissible in a court of law) will be preferred whenever
reasonably available, but in no case may findings be based solely upon incompetent evidence unless
competent evidence is not reasonably available, the evidence in question appears to be particularly
reliable, and the matter at issue is not seriously disputed. In exercising its authority, the Board may
reverse or affirm, in whole or in part or modify the Administrative Official's order, requirement,
decision, or determination from which an appeal is taken and make the correct order, requirement,
decision, or determination, and for that purpose the Board has the same authority as the
Administrative Official.
(supp. No. 11)
Page 57 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:31 [EST]
Sec. 3.14.040. Decision on Appeal.
The Board shall review the application, the Director's report, conduct a Hearing in accordance with the Board's
established procedures and State law, and take final action on the application. It shall require a concurring vote of
three -fourths vote of all members of the Zoning Board of Adjustment to overturn an administrative decision.
SECTION 3.15. ZONING VARIANCE AND SPECIAL EXCEPTION4
Sec. 3.15.010. Applicability.
A. Zoning Variance.
In accordance with the provisions of the Texas Local Government Code chs. 211 and 216, the Zoning Board of
Adjustment (Board) shall have the authority to hear and grant requests for a Variance from the zoning
provisions and sign regulations of this Unified Development Code. A Variance to the development standards
of this Code shall be considered an exception to the regulations, rather than a right.
A Zoning Variance differs from a Subdivision Variance, which applies to certain regulations pertaining to
subdivision of land and must be requested from the Planning & Zoning Commission during the subdivision
review process.
B. Special Exceptions.
In accordance with the provisions of Texas Local Government Code ch. 211, the Zoning Board of Adjustment
shall also have the authority to hear and decide Special Exceptions to the terms of this Code when the Code
requires the Board to do so.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017; Ord. No. 2020-08 , § 2(Exh. A), 1-28-2020)
Sec. 3.15.020. Zoning Variance and Special Exception Process.
A. Initiation.
Initiation of a request for a Zoning Variance or Special Exception may be made upon application by the
property owner of the affected property or their authorized agent.
B. Application.
Application for a Zoning Variance or Special Exception must comply with the UDC Development Manual.
Applications must include all materials determined necessary by the Director.
C. Completeness Determination.
Upon submission on an application, the Director shall determine whether the application is complete, as
described in Section 3.02.040.
D. Staff Review.
'Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, adopted February 28, 2017, changed the title of Section 3.15 from
"Variance and Special Exception" to "Zoning Variance and Special Exception."
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 58 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:31 [EST]
1. Once an application for a Zoning Variance or Special Exception request has been received and the
application deemed complete, the Director shall review the application, considering any applicable
criteria for approval, and prepare a report to the Zoning Board of Adjustment.
2. The Director may establish procedures for administrative review necessary to ensure compliance with
this Code and State statutes.
3. The Director may assign staff to review the application and make a preliminary report to the Director.
4. The Director's report may include a recommendation for final action.
E. Notice and Hearing.
1. The Zoning Board of Adjustment shall hold a public hearing for consideration of the Zoning Variance or
Special Exception request on the next available regular scheduled meeting after the date of the
application is filed.
2. Written notice of the public hearing for a Zoning Variance or Special Exception shall be provided as set
forth in Section 3.03 of this Code.
The applicant may appear at the hearing in person or by agent or attorney.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017; Ord. No. 2020-08 , § 2(Exh. A), 1-28-2020)
Sec. 3.15.030. Criteria for Zoning Variance Review.
A. Required Findings.
The Zoning Board of Adjustment may authorize a Zoning Variance from the requirements of the zoning
provisions and sign regulations of this Unified Development Code if the Variance from the terms of the
zoning provisions is not contrary to the public interest and, due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of
the requirements would result in unnecessary hardship, so the spirit of this Code is preserved, and
substantial justice done. No Zoning Variance shall be granted unless the ZBA finds all of the following:
1. Extraordinary Conditions.
That there are extraordinary or special conditions affecting the land involved such that strict
application of the provisions of this Unified Development Code will deprive the applicant of the
reasonable use of their land. For example, a Zoning Variance might be justified because of topographic
or other special conditions unique to the property and development involved, while it would not be
justified due to inconvenience or financial disadvantage.
2. No Substantial Detriment.
That the granting of the Zoning Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare
or injurious to other property in the area or to the City in administering this Code.
3. Other Property.
That the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance do not generally apply to other
property in the vicinity.
4. Applicant's Actions.
That the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance are not the result of the applicant's
own actions.
5. Comprehensive Plan.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 59 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:31 [EST]
That the granting of the Zoning Variance would not substantially conflict with the Comprehensive Plan
and the purposes of this Code.
6. Utilization.
That because of the conditions that create the need for the Zoning Variance, the application of this
Code to the particular piece of property would effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict the
utilization of the property.
7. Insufficient Findings.
The following types of possible findings do not constitute sufficient grounds for granting a Zoning
Variance:
a. That the property cannot be used for its highest and best use.
b. That there is a financial or economic hardship, except as authorized in Local Government Code
211.009(b-1).
C. That there is a self-created hardship by the property owner or their agent.
d. That the development objectives of the property owner are or will be frustrated.
B. Limitations.
The Zoning Board of Adjustment may not grant a Zoning Variance when the effect of which would be any of
the following:
1. To allow the establishment of a use not otherwise permitted in the applicable zoning district.
2. To increase the density of a use above that permitted by the applicable district.
3. To extend physically a nonconforming use of land.
4. To change the zoning district boundaries shown on the Official Zoning Map.
C. Profitability Not to Be Considered.
The fact that property may be utilized more profitably should a Zoning Variance be granted may not be
considered grounds for a Zoning Variance.
D. Limitation on Variances for Signs.
No Variance application(s) shall be accepted for prohibited signs listed in Section 10.04 ("Signs Prohibited
Under this Code").
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017; Ord. No. 2020-08, § 2(Exh. A), 1-28-2020)
Sec. 3.15.040. Criteria for Special Exception Review.
If authorized by this Code, the Zoning Board of Adjustment may grant a Special Exception from the requirements
of the certain provisions of this Unified Development Code, if the Special Exception is not contrary to the public
interest and the spirit of this Code is preserved and substantial justice done. No Special Exception shall be granted
unless the ZBA finds the specific criteria identified in this Code are met. The only Special Exceptions that may be
granted by the Board are for the following:
• Time extension for an abandoned nonconforming use, pursuant to Subsection 14.01.060.B.7.
• Expansion of nonconforming use, pursuant to Section 14.02.050.
• Right to continue nonconforming use after destruction or damage, pursuant to Subsection 14.02.060.A.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 60 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:31 [EST]
• Abandonment of a nonconforming structure determination, pursuant to Section 14.04.050.
• Expansion of a nonconforming structure, pursuant to Subsections 14.04.080.B. and C.
• Abandonment of a nonconforming site, pursuant to Section 14.05.050.
• A setback exception, pursuant to Subsection 14.05.050.D.
• Expansion of a nonconforming site, pursuant to Subsections 14.05.080.B. and C.
(Ord. No. 2015-34, § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2015)
Sec. 3.15.050. Expiration of Zoning Variance and Special Exception.
A. Zoning Variance.
Zoning Variance approval shall expire 24 months from the date of ZBA approval unless a Building Permit has
been issued and construction commenced or, if no Building Permit is required, a Certificate of Occupancy has
been issued.
B. Special Exception.
A Special Exception shall expire 24 months from the date of Board approval, unless:
1. A Building Permit application has been issued and construction commenced or, if no Building Permit is
required, a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued.
The Board approval extended the 24-month expiration date and provided for an alternative expiration;
however, in no case shall the expiration date exceed 36 months.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
SECTION 3.16. ADMINISTRATIVE EXCEPTION
Sec. 3.16.010. Applicability.
A. In order to provide a method, to correct human error, allow for minor numerical adjustments, or consider
alternative design schemes for particular development standards of this Code, Administrative Exceptions
may be permitted. Administrative Exceptions are specified deviations from otherwise applicable
development standards where development is proposed that would be:
Compatible with surrounding land uses;
2. Harmonious with the public interest; and
3. Consistent with the purposes of this Code.
B. Administrative Exceptions shall comply with all other provisions of this Code not specifically relieved by the
Administrative Exception. Administrative Exceptions expressly permitted in this section may be approved
only if meeting the criteria provided in Section 3.16.030.
C. The Director or the Building Official is responsible for final action on Administrative Exceptions.
D. An appeal of an Administrative Exception may be made to the Zoning Board of Adjustment in accordance
with the rules and authority granted thereto.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 61 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:31 [EST]
Sec. 3.16.020. Authority.
A. The Director or Building Official shall have the authority to determine that the language or a particular
development standard in this Code is incorrect, unclear, or otherwise in error and authorize an adjustment
or interpretation to correct such error as necessary.
The Director or Building Official shall have the authority to consider and authorize an adjustment up to ten
percent (10%) of any numerical standard set forth in this Code, with the following exceptions:
1. A request for an increase in the number of units permitted on a lot or parcel does not qualify for an
Administrative Exception.
Any numerical standard set forth in this Code that has been previously adjusted by way of a City board
or commission, Special Exception, Special Use Permit, or other similar process may not be eligible for
an Administrative Exception. Accordingly, any adjustment made in conformance with this section may
not be allowed further adjustment by any other process allowed in this Code.
Any consideration of a numerical adjustment greater than ten percent (10%) shall require a request for
a Variance, per the terms of Section 3.15 of this Code.
C. The Director or Building Official shall have authority to consider alternative design plan(s) or other uses or
requirements for the following situations:
1. Courthouse view overlay height exception (per Section 4.12.040).
2. Alternative residential boundary wall (per Section 8.07.060).
3. Alternative building design plan (per Section 7.04.070).
4. Alternative landscape standards (per Section 8.05.050).
5. Alternative parking plan (per Section 9.02.050).
6. Alternative sign plan (per Section 10.01.090).
7. Alternative fences (per Section 8.07.080).
8. Change of use (per Section 14.02.030).
9. Expansion of nonconforming uses (per Section 14.02.050).
10. Postponement of required improvements (per Section 14.05.070).
11. Heritage Tree or Protected Tree Preservation Priority (per Section 8.02.050).
(Ord. No. 2021-62 , § 2(Exh. A), 9-14-2021)
Sec. 3.16.030. Approval Criteria.
To approve an application for an Administrative Exception, the Director or Building Official must determine that
the following criteria are met:
A. That granting the Administrative Exception serves an obvious and needed purpose.
B. That granting the Administrative Exception will ensure an equal or better level of design or land use
compatibility as the otherwise applicable standards.
C. That granting the Administrative Exception will not materially and adversely affect adjacent land uses
and the physical character of uses in the immediate vicinity of the proposed development.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 62 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:31 [EST]
D. That granting the Administrative Exception will be consistent with the purposes and intent of this
Unified Development Code.
Sec. 3.16.040. Expiration of Administrative Exception.
The Administrative Exception shall expire if the companion application expires, according to the specified
expiration in this chapter. If the Administrative Exception is a stand alone application the approval will expire in' 24
months, if the exception is not utilized in a manner consistent with the approval.
SECTION 3.17. STORMWA TER PERMIT
Sec. 3.17.010. Applicability.
To ensure conformance to the stormwater management provisions of this Code, a Stormwater Permit is required
prior to any land disturbance, as defined in Section 16.02, except for a single or two-family structure on a legal lot
one acre or greater in the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ). Approval of a Site Development Plan or
Subdivision Construction Plans constitutes approval of a Stormwater Permit. The provisions of this Section related
to Stormwater Permitting are adopted pursuant to the authority conferred by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, The Texas Local Government Code chs. 211 and 212, and
the City Charter.
(Ord. No. 2015-48, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015; Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 3.17.020. Review Process.
Review of a Stormwater Permit shall follow the procedure set forth in Section 3.03.040.
Sec. 3.17.030. Criteria for Approval.
A. The applicant must ensure that the application for a Stormwater Permit was prepared or reviewed,
approved, and sealed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Texas prior to submission to the
City, and that the application meets the requirements of the UDC Development Manual.
B. A Stormwater Permit will be issued after the Development Engineer has determined that the development
meets the stormwater and pollution management requirements of Chapter 11.
C. A Stormwater Permit is conditional upon all applicable related permits required from the Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or any other State or federal agency
being issued by that agency.
D. A Grading Permit, processed and reviewed as a Stormwater Permit, may be considered by the Development
Engineer for vegetation clearing, and site grading. Such a permit may be issued at the discretion of the
Development Engineer for specific activities such as understory removal and rough grading, and shall not
include removal of protected trees, utility work, paving or foundation. The Development Engineer may
revoke the permit and issue a stop -work order if non -compliant.
E. A Stormwater Permit shall not be issued until an Electric Utility Services Availability Letter, as defined in this
Code, has been submitted to the City.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017; Ord. No. 2020-40 , § 2(Exh. A), 5-12-2020)
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 63 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:32 [EST]
Sec. 3.17.040. Responsibility for Final Action.
Final Action Authority shall be as noted in 2.01.020 of this Code.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 3.17.050. Expiration.
A Stormwater Permit shall expire 24 months after the date that the permit was issued if the improvements
identified in the permit are not constructed.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
SECTION 3.18. SIGN PERMIT
Sec. 3.18.010. Applicability.
No sign may hereafter be erected, moved, added to or structurally altered within the City or the extraterritorial
jurisdiction without a permit issued by the Building Official in conformity with the provisions of this section. No
Building Permit issued under the provisions of this Code for signs shall be considered valid unless signed by the
Building Official. The provisions of this section relating to sign permits are adopted pursuant to Texas Local
Government Code chs. 211, 214, 216, and the City Charter.
Sec. 3.18.020. Review Process.
Review of a sign permit shall follow the procedures set forth in Section 3.03.050.
Sec. 3.18.030. Criteria for Approval.
In addition to the general criteria for approval of administrative procedures in Subsection 3.03.040.D.1, the
Building Official shall base the final action on the following criteria:
A. Whether the intended sign conforms in all respects with all applicable regulations and standards of this
Unified Development Code and any applicable construction or safety standards of the City's adopted
building Code.
If the subject property has a Master Sign Plan, Development Agreement or ordinance governing it,
whether the plans, specifications, and intended use of such building or structures or part thereof
conform in all respects to the Development Agreement or ordinance.
Sec. 3.18.040. Responsibility for Final Action.
A. Final Action Authority shall be as noted in 2.01.020 of this Code.
Appeals of Building Official actions regarding sign -related Building Permits are considered by the Zoning
Board of Adjustment and must follow the standard appeal of an administrative decision procedure described
in Section 3.14.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 64 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:32 [EST]
Sec. 3.18.050. Expiration.
A Sign Permit shall expire six months after issuance if the sign is not constructed in a manner consistent with the
permit.
SECTION 3.19. DRIVEWAY ACCESS PERMITS
Sec. 3.19.010. Purpose.
The purpose of a Driveway Access Permit is to determine the safety, mobility, and operational impacts that a
proposed access connection will have on the roadway system.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 3.19.020. Applicability.
Driveway Permits are required for the following:
A. New driveway locations on roadways within the jurisdictional limits of the City;
B. Existing driveways on roadways within the jurisdictional limits of the City for those developments
which represent a change in property usage or zoning.
C. For the purposes of this section the jurisdictional limits of the City shall include properties within the
municipal limits of the City as well as the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ).
D. The alteration of a public street curb or drainage facility, if not associated with an approved
Construction Plan or Building Permit. Such request shall comply with Chapter 12.08, Street Excavations,
of the Georgetown Municipal Code.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 3.19.030. Review Process.
Review of a Driveway Access Permit shall follow the administrative review procedures set forth in Section
3.03.050, subject to the criteria for approval set forth below.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, adopted February 28, 2017, repealed the former Section 3.19.030 in its
entirety, which pertained to the Pre -Application Conference, and derived from original codification.
Subsequently, Sections 3.19.040-3.19.080 have been redesignated as Sections 3.19.030-3.19.070.
'Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, adopted February 28, 2017, changed the title of Section 3.19 from
"Driveway Permit" to "Driveway Access Permit."
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 65 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:32 [EST]
Sec. 3.19.040. Criteria for Approval.
No Driveway Access Permit will be denied unless it is determined by the Development Engineer that the proposed
location of the driveway will have an adverse effect upon the public safety. In making this determination the
following will be evaluated:
A. Existing driveways;
B. Land use (including but not limited to the intensity of development and trip attraction/generation
potential, mix of vehicles, and turning movements);
C. Function of public street (including but not limited to the number of lanes, medians, median openings,
vertical and horizontal curvature, sight distance, operating speeds, traffic volumes, entrance/exit
ramps, and frontage roads);
D. The location of nearby streets and driveways;
E. The Site Plan (including but not limited to on -site circulation, delineation of the intended paths, parking
stalls, location of buildings, location of loading areas);
F. Actual or anticipated excessive increase in vehicular traffic being routed onto streets occurring as a
result of any such permit;
G. Physical constraints on the site including topography and site distance(s);
H. Unusual lot configurations;
I. Potential traffic movements which are unsafe or have an adverse effect on traffic operations;
J. Joint access at the time of subdivision or Site Plan approval for abutting lots which have insufficient
frontage to allow a driveway approach for each lot; and
K. That strict enforcement of the criteria for approval would result in a denial of access for the site.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Note(s)—See editor's note at Section 3.19.030.
Sec. 3.19.050. Submission Requirements.
The Development Engineer will determine during the Pre -Application Meeting if further studies will be required.
Such studies may include, but shall not be limited to, the following:
A. Engineering Study.
1. An Engineering Study may be required based upon the determination of the Development Engineer.
In all cases the City will require only those elements of an Engineering Study that are necessary to
answer the specific questions that arise during the review process. The Engineering Study shall
conform to standard engineering practices and must be sealed by a Professional Engineer
licensed in the State of Texas. The Development Engineer will review the following information in
the determination to require an Engineering Study:
(Supp. No. 11)
a. Compliance with the minimum spacing requirements of this Code;
Deceleration or acceleration lane required;
C. Traffic volumes and classification of the intersecting street at the proposed driveway
location;
Page 66 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:32 [EST]
d. Sight distance or physical obstructions and/or constraints that will result in a safety
problem;
e. Environmental or hydraulic issues associated with the proposed driveway(s); and
f. Lot configuration.
2. An Engineering Study shall contain the following information:
a. Trip generation based upon the latest edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual unless
there is acceptable data that supports the use of another trip generation source.
b. Trip distribution, to be performed with input from the City.
C. Traffic assignment to determine the forecasted turning movements attributable to the
proposed development.
d. Traffic volumes if determined by the Development Engineer and subject to the following
criteria:
i. The existing traffic counts will be grown using an annual growth rate as agreed
to by the City to the build -out year of the proposed development;
ii. The resulting traffic volumes will be used as background traffic volumes, and
the assigned forecasted turning movements will be added to the background
traffic volumes resulting in the total traffic volumes; and
III. The total traffic volumes will be used to determine the need for left -turn and
right -turn lanes.
B. Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA).
1. A TIA may be required based upon the determination of the Development Engineer. In all cases the
City will require only those elements of a TIA that are necessary to answer the specific questions
that arise during the permitting process.
2. A TIA shall contain the following information:
a. All of the information outlined in Subsection 3.19.060.A.2 above.
b. Operational analysis (level of service, capacity, etc.) for the determined study intersections.
C. Recommendations for mitigation measures should the impact of the proposed access
point(s) result in unacceptable levels of service.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Note(s)—See editor's note at Section 3.19.030.
Sec. 3.19.060. Responsibility for Final Action.
Final Action Authority shall be as noted in 2.01.020 of this Code.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Note(s)—See editor's note at Section 3.19.030.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 67 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:32 [EST]
Sec. 3.19.070. Expiration.
A Driveway Access Permit will expire 18 months after issuance if the driveway is not constructed in a manner
consistent with the permit.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Note(s)—See editor's note at Section 3.19.030.
SECTION 3.20. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Sec. 3.20.010. Applicability.
A. An application for a Development Agreement pursuant to Section 212.172 of the Texas Local Government
Code seeking to modify or delay certain requirements of this Code (including any manuals adopted by
reference by this Code) and/or any other provisions of the City Code of Ordinances in order to present an
alternative plan for development that could not otherwise be accomplished under this Code or the Code of
Ordinances may be filed in accordance with the terms and conditions of this section.
This section shall apply to any new agreement and any amendments thereto, as well as to any amendments
to an existing Development Agreement.
(Ord. No. 2019-01, § 2(Exh. A), 1-8-2019)
Sec. 3.20.020. Review Process.
A. Initiation.
Initiation of a Development Agreement or an amendment may be made upon:
1. Application of a property owner or their authorized agent;
2. Recommendation of the City Council;
3. Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission or appropriate board or commission; or
4. Recommendation of the Director.
B. Application and Completeness Determination.
Applications shall be reviewed by a Development Agreement Committee ("Committee") which shall be
designated by the Director at the time of application to determine the necessary staff for the particular
application. The Committee will be established based on the functional areas needed in order to
appropriately respond to the request being considered. The Committee may consist of the City's
Development Engineer, City Attorney, Finance Director, Community Development Director, Planning
Director, Planner(s), Systems Engineering Director, Georgetown Utility Systems representative(s), their
designees or any other staff assigned to the Committee.
The Committee shall determine completeness of the application no more than 15 working days following
submittal of the application. At that time, the Committee shall also assign staff hourly rates, a payment
schedule, and determine if the application is consistent with City policies and advances a legitimate City
interest; otherwise, the Committee may reject the application based on such criteria.
C. Staff Review.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 68 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:32 [EST]
1. The Committee shall review the application, consider the approval criteria, and assign a project
manager to lead the review and prepare a report to the Planning and Zoning Commission and/or
appropriate board or commission and City Council.
2. The Director may establish procedures for administrative review necessary to ensure compliance with
this Code and State statute.
3. The project manager's report may include a recommendation for final action.
D. Public Notice.
Public notice, in the form of mailed, published, and posted notice, shall be required per the notice provisions
of this Code, unless the agreement or amendment thereto is determined by the Committee to be minor,
inconsequential, or otherwise unnecessary for public notice and Public Hearings. If notice is required, the
Committee shall determine the location and the extent of the notice based on the type and effect of the
proposed amendment.
E. Board or Commission Review.
The Planning and Zoning Commission or other appropriate board or commission, shall hold a Public Hearing,
unless determined unnecessary by the Committee, and make a recommendation to the City Council.
City Council Final Action.
1. The City Council shall hold a Public Hearing, unless determined unnecessary by the Committee, and
may take final action on the proposed Development Agreement or amendment.
2. The Development Agreement or amendment shall become effective in the manner provided by the
City Charter or State law.
3. All outstanding application, staff, and legal fees must be paid in full to the City prior to the adoption of
the agreement or amendment.
Sec. 3.20.030. Approval Criteria.
In determining whether to approve, approve with modifications or disapprove a proposed Development
Agreement or amendment, the City Council shall consider the following matters:
1. The proposed agreement promotes the health, safety or general welfare of the City and the safe
orderly, and healthful development of the City.
2. The proposed agreement is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
SECTION 3.21. LICENSE TO ENCROACH
Sec. 3.21.010. Purpose.
The purpose of a License to Encroach is to determine the potential impacts of proposed improvements, structures,
facilities, and encroachments into a public street, roadway, sidewalk, right-of-way, or easement in order to
maintain their safety, mobility, and operational functionality.
Sec. 3.21.020. Applicability.
A. A License to Encroach, in the procedures provided for in this section, is required for the following:
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 69 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:32 [EST]
New improvements, structures, facilities, and encroachments into a public street, roadway, sidewalk,
or right-of-way within the City limits and easements located within the City limits or the extra-
territorial jurisdiction.
Existing improvements, structures, facilities and encroachments into a public street, roadway,
sidewalk, or right-of-way within the City limits and easements located within the City limits or the
extra -territorial jurisdiction.
Those improvements, as defined in Subsection A. above, that encroach into a public street, roadway, or
sidewalk shall obtain approval from the City Council, in addition to this license.
Sec. 3.21.030. Review Process.
Review of a License to Encroach shall follow the administrative review procedures set forth in Section 3.03.040,
subject to the criteria for approval set forth below.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, adopted February 28, 2017, repealed the former Section 3.21.030 in its
entirety, which pertained to the Pre -Application Conference, and derived from original codification.
Subsequently, Sections 3.21.040-3.21.080 have been redesignated Sections 3.21.030-3.21.070.
Sec. 3.21.040. Criteria for Approval.
No License to Encroach will be denied unless it is determined by the Development Engineer that the proposed
location or type of improvement will negatively impact the function of the public street, roadway, sidewalk, right-
of-way, or easement or have an adverse effect upon the health, safety, or welfare of the general public. In making
this determination, the following will be evaluated:
A. The proposed encroachment into a public street, roadway, sidewalk, right-of-way, or easement by any
person shall not interfere with the lawful use thereof.
Any proposed construction within a public street, roadway, sidewalk, right-of-way, or easement shall
be in accordance with this Code, the City's adopted construction standards, and any other applicable
ordinances and regulations.
C. At any time during the construction of any structure within a public street, roadway, sidewalk right-of-
way, or easement:
1. The applicable public street, roadway, or sidewalk shall be kept open for vehicular and pedestrian
traffic in a reasonable manner and sidewalks shall not be obstructed as to prevent the use
thereof by pedestrians;
Dirt and other material removed from the construction of any structure within a public street,
roadway, sidewalk, right-of-way or easement shall not be allowed to remain on the street or
sidewalk and shall be removed immediately at the sole cost, risk, liability, and expense of the
licensee;
3. All excavations and obstructions of any kind that take place during the period of the licensee's
construction shall be properly barricaded and well -illuminated during the night, subject to the
approval of the Building Official.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Note(s)—See editor's note at Section 3.21.030.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 70 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:32 [EST]
Sec. 3.21.050. Submission Requirements.
Staff may determine further studies will be required. Such studies may include, but are not limited to, an
Engineering Study, which may be required at the determination of the Development Engineer. Only the elements
of an engineering study that are necessary to answer specific questions that arise during the review process will be
required for submittal.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Note(s)—See editor's note at Section 3.21.030.
Sec. 3.21.060. Responsibility for Final Action.
The Development Engineer is responsible for final action on Licenses to Encroach into a public easement. For those
requests that encroach into a public street, roadway, sidewalk, or right-of-way, final approval shall be obtained
from the City Council.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Note(s)—See editor's note at Section 3.21.030.
Sec. 3.21.070. Expiration.
The City shall provide written notice at least 180 days in advance to the licensee, its representatives, successors, or
assigns, to take possession of and use all or any part of the licensed area in the event that such use be reasonably
desired or needed by the City for street, sewer, transportation, or any other public or municipal use or purpose.
During such time, it is the responsibility of the licensee, its representatives, successors or assigns to remove the
encroachment(s). In such an event, the City shall have the right to cancel the revocable license as to that portion of
the licensed area so designated and required by the City.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Note(s)—See editor's note at Section 3.21.030.
SECTION 3.22. SUBDIVISION VARIANCE6
Sec. 3.22.010. Applicability.
A variance of certain subdivision standards of this Code, as provided for within this Code, may be considered
concurrently with a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Minor Plat, or Replat to address unforeseen circumstances or other
difficulties in developing a property under the specific provisions of this Code. A Subdivision Variance application
may be filed without a companion plat application in very limited circumstances if the granting of the variance
would eliminate the requirement of the plat, as determined by the Director.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
'Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, adopted February 28, 2017, amended Section 3.22 in its entirety to read
as herein set out. Formerly, Section 3.22, §§ 3.22.010-3.22.080 pertained to Plat Waivers, and derived from
original codification.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 71 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:32 [EST]
Sec. 3.22.020. Initiation.
Initiation of the Subdivision Variance may be made upon submittal of a complete application by a property owner
or their designated agent.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 3.22.030. Application and Completeness Determination.
The applicant shall submit all of the information required in the UDC Development Manual. The Director is
responsible for determining the completeness of an application submitted, pursuant to Section 3.02.040.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 3.22.040. Staff Review.
A. The Director shall review the application, considering applicable criteria for approval, and prepare a report to
the Planning and Zoning Commission.
B. The Director may establish procedures for administrative review necessary to ensure compliance with this
Code and state statute.
C. The Director may assign staff to review the application and make a report to the Director.
D. The Director's report may include a recommendation for final action.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 3.22.050. Planning and Zoning Final Action.
Following notice in accordance with Section 3.03, the Commission shall hold a public hearing in accordance with its
rules and state law and consider the Subdivision Variance, Director's report, state law, and compliance with this
Code, and take final action. Approval of a Subdivision Variance shall require a super -majority vote of the members
present. Any approved Subdivision Variance shall be noted on all corresponding plats, if applicable.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 3.22.060. Approval Criteria.
A Subdivision Variance may be approved, conditionally approved, or disapproved. At least four of the following
factors are required for approval:
A. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or
injurious to other property in the area or to the City in administering this Code.
B. That the granting of the variance would not substantially conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and the
purposes of this Code.
C. That the conditions that create the need for the variance do not generally apply to other property in
the vicinity.
D. That application of a provision of this Code will render subdivision of the land impossible.
E. Where the literal enforcement of these regulations would result in an unnecessary hardship.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 72 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:32 [EST]
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 3.22.070. Reserved.
Sec. 3.22.080. Expiration of Subdivision Variance.
The Subdivision Variance shall expire if the corresponding plat expires, according to the timing specified in Section
3.08 of this Code.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
SECTION 3.23. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT
Sec. 3.23.010. Purpose.
The purpose of a Tree Removal Permit is to determine whether such a tree should be removed based on its
species, size, location, health, viability and its impact on the overall site design. Protected and Heritage trees shall
not be removed without first securing approval from the City.
(Ord. No. 2021-62 , § 2(Exh. A), 9-14-2021)
Sec. 3.23.020. Applicability.
A. The provisions of this section shall apply to all property located within the corporate limits and in the extra
territorial jurisdiction (ETJ) of the City.
B. The provisions of this section apply to all development subject to this Code, except as noted below, whether
or not there is an active permit for the project.
Single-family or two-family residential lots approved and platted prior to February 13, 2007, are exempt from
the requirement of a tree removal permit. However, single-family and two-family lots platted after February
13, 2007 are subject to the heritage tree protection provisions in Section 8.02, which shall apply to the
developer, home builder and homeowner. Not withstanding the preceding exemption, if a future change of
use from a single-family or two-family home to any other use triggers a permit under this Code then the
provisions of the Removal Permit will be required.
(Ord. No. 2021-62 , § 2(Exh. A), 9-14-2021)
Sec. 3.23.030. Reserved.
Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 2021-62 , § 2(Exh. A), adopted September 14, 2021, repealed the former Section
3.23.030 in its entirety, which pertained to the pre -application conference, and derived from original
codification.
'Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 2021-62 , § 2(Exh. A), adopted September 14, 2021, changed the title of Section 3.23
from "Heritage tree removal permit" to "Tree removal permit."
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 73 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:32 [EST]
Sec. 3.23.040. Review Process.
Review of a Tree Removal Permit shall follow the administrative review procedures set forth in Section 3.03.040,
subject to the criteria for approval set forth below.
(Ord. No. 2021-62 , § 2(Exh. A), 9-14-2021)
Sec. 3.23.050. Criteria for Approval.
No Tree Removal Permit shall be approved unless it is determined by the Urban Forester or their designee, that
the proposed removal is justified, based on the tree species and site conditions of the tree. In making this
determination the following will be evaluated:
A. Tree species;
B. Tree size/number of trunks;
C. Tree health and viability;
D. Tree location;
E. Protected and heritage trees to remain on site; and
F. Whether the project can be developed without tree removal.
(Ord. No. 2021-62 , § 2(Exh. A), 9-14-2021)
Sec. 3.23.060. Submission Requirements.
A. Statement of justification for tree removal.
B. Copy of companion plat, Site Development Plan or concept plan for the permit or authorization that required
compliance with this section.
C. Copy of tree survey, if applicable. If no tree survey exists, location of tree identified, tree type, size,
condition, etc.
D. A photo of the tree's canopy and trunk, labeled with the corresponding tree number on the companion tree
survey, shall be submitted with the application for a heritage tree removal permit.
(Ord. No. 2015-48, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015)
Sec. 3.23.070. Responsibility for Final Action.
A. Final Action Authority shall be as noted in 2.01.020 of this Code.
Upon receipt of the application, the Landscape Planner shall inspect the subject tree and approve or deny
the application in accordance with the provisions of this section within ten working days of the date of the
application. Upon written request from the owner or the owner(s)'s representative, said date for the
Landscape Planner final decision may be extended for a period of up to 15 additional days.
C. An applicant may appeal a denial of a Tree Removal Permit to the City Council. Such appeal must be made in
writing and received by the Director within 30 days of the date of the decision on the application by the
Urban Forester. The Director shall set the matter for Public Hearing before the City Council at the earliest
possible regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council. The City Council shall review the request and render
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 74 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:33 [EST]
a decision affirming, affirming in part, conditionally affirming or reversing the determination of the Urban
Forester. If a Tree Removal Permit is issued after appeal, pursuant to the provisions of this Code, the
applicant must comply with all applicable provisions of this Code, including mitigation.
D. The applicant shall, prior to approval of the application, submit a mitigation or payment of fees -in -lieu
calculation and a mitigation plan, pursuant to Section 8.05 showing the proposed species, location and
irrigation plan for the proposed mitigation trees.
The Director is authorized to identify and require such documents as are necessary to process this request.
Said requirements and/or documents shall be published in the City's Development Manual.
(Ord. No. 2021-62 , § 2(Exh. A), 9-14-2021)
Sec. 3.23.080. Expiration.
A Tree Removal Permit shall remain valid for the longer of:
A. The period of validity of the permit or authorization that required compliance with this section; or
One hundred eighty days from the issuance of the tree removal permit.
(Ord. No. 2021-62 , § 2(Exh. A), 9-14-2021)
SECTION 3.24. HERITAGE TREE PRUNING PERMIT
Sec. 3.24.010. Purpose.
The purpose of a Heritage Tree Pruning Permit is to determine whether such a tree should be pruned and how the
pruning shall be performed. Heritage trees shall not be pruned without first securing approval from the City.
Sec. 3.24.020. Applicability.
A. The provisions of this section shall apply to all property located within the corporate limits and in the extra
territorial jurisdiction (ETJ) of the City.
B. A Heritage Tree Pruning Permit shall be required for any pruning of a heritage tree located on all properties,
including single-family and two-family lots platted after February 13, 2007; however, a tree pruning permit
shall only be required during the original home construction. Notwithstanding the preceding exemption, if a
future change of use from a single-family or two-family home to any other use triggers a permit under this
Code then the provisions of the Heritage Pruning Permit will be required.
Sec. 3.24.030. Review Process.
Review of a Heritage Tree Pruning Permit shall follow the administrative review procedures set forth in Section
3.03.040, subject to the criteria for approval set forth below.
Sec. 3.24.040. Criteria for Approval.
No Heritage Tree Pruning Permit will be approved unless it is determined by the Urban Forester or their designee,
that the proposed pruning is justified based on the health or viability of the tree and that the proposed pruning will
not negatively impact the health and appearance of the tree. In making this determination the following will be
evaluated:
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 75 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:33 [EST]
A. Reason for pruning request;
B. Tree location;
C. Percent of canopy to be removed;
D. Tree health; and
E. Whether an ISA Certified Arborist is going to perform the pruning.
Sec. 3.24.050. Submission Requirements.
A. Statement of justification for tree pruning.
B. Copy of companion plat, Site Development Plan or concept plan for the permit or authorization that required
compliance with this section.
C. A photo (digital or hardcopy) of the tree, labeled with the tree number on the tree survey, DBH, species, and
contractor's ISA certification number, shall be submitted with the application for a Heritage Tree Pruning
Permit.
(Ord. No. 2015-48, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015)
Sec. 3.24.060. Responsibility for Final Action.
A. Final Action Authority shall be as noted in Section 2.01.020 of this Code.
B.
C. An applicant may appeal the denial of a Heritage Tree Pruning Permit to the Director. Such appeal must be
made in writing and received by the Director within 30 days of the date of the decision on the application by
the Urban Forester. The request for appeal shall set forth the specific reasons for the appeal and state the
specific reasons for disagreement with the decision of the Urban Forester, including the basis for the
applicant's position that the application should have been granted. Appeals shall be processed in accordance
with Section 2.01.020 and 3.14 of this Code.
Sec. 3.24.070. Expiration.
The Heritage Tree Pruning Permit shall remain valid for 180 days from date of issuance.
SECTION 3.25. ANNEXATION
Sec. 3.25.010. Applicability.
A. For the purpose of establishing and maintaining sound, stable, and desirable development consistent with
the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, the City may consider annexations of territory to the
corporate limits or extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ). The provisions of the Section are adopted pursuant to
Texas Local Government Code ch. 43 and the City Charter.
Annexation and disannexation of territory may be requested by landowners or their representatives through
this process for real property within the City's corporate limits and the ETJ.
C. (Ord. No. 2015-48, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015)
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 76 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:33 [EST]
Sec. 3.25.020. Review Process.
A. Initiation.
Initiation of an annexation or disannexation of territory may be made upon application of a property owner
or their authorized agent. Another governmental authority may also request modification of ETJ or corporate
limit boundaries through this process, or through the cooperative effort of the Georgetown City Council to
initiate such proceedings.
B. Application and Completeness Determination.
The Director is responsible for checking that a complete application has been submitted with all material
necessary for the City Council to render an informed decision.
C. Staff Review.
The Director shall review the application, considering any applicable criteria for approval and prepare a
report to the City Council.
2. The Director may establish procedures for administrative review necessary to ensure compliance with
this Code and state statutes.
3. The Director may assign staff to review the application and make a report to the Director.
4. The Director's report may include a recommendation for final action.
D. Written Agreement Regarding Services
If required pursuant to Section 43.0672 of the Texas Local Government Code, the City Council shall
approve a written agreement regarding services with the property owner prior to initiation of annexation.
City Council Public Hearings.
City Council shall hold public hearings as required by applicable sections of Texas Local Government Code
Chapter 43.
E. City Council Final Action.
1. The City Council shall take final action on the proposed annexation or disannexation.
2. The annexation or disannexation shall become effective when approved by the City Council and in
accordance with the City Charter.
(Ord. No. 2015-48, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015)
Sec. 3.25.030. Approval Criteria (Annexation).
The City Council shall consider the following approval criteria in an analysis of immediate needs and consideration
of the long -terms effects.
A. The application is complete and the information contained within the application is sufficient and
correct enough to allow adequate review and final action; and
B. The annexation promotes the health, safety or general welfare of the City and the safe, orderly, and
healthful development of the City.
C. Consistency with the City's adopted long range plans and annexation policies.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 77 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:33 [EST]
(Ord. No. 2015-48, § 2(Exh. A), 9-22-2015)
SECTION 3.26. REQUEST FOR CREATION OF A MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
(MUD), WATER CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (WCID) OR FRESH
WATER SUPPLY DISTRICT (FWSD)
Sec. 3.26.010. Applicability.
The review process in this section establishes the process and procedures for requesting a Municipal Utility
District ("MUD"), Water Control and Improvement District ("WCID"), Fresh Water Supply District ("FWSD"), or
similar political subdivision ("District") in accordance with Section 13.10.010 of this Code.
(Ord. No. 2019-01, § 2(Exh. A), 1-8-2019)
Sec. 3.26.020. Review Process.
A. Initiation.
Initiation of a request for the creation of a District may be made upon application of a property owner or
their authorized agent.
B. Application for Completeness Determination.
The applicant shall provide a complete application with the material and supporting information outlined in
the Development Manual. The Planning Director, or designee, is responsible for checking that a complete
application has been submitted with all material necessary for the City Council to render an informed
decision.
C. Staff Review.
1. Upon receipt of a complete application, the cross -departmental "Special Purpose District Petition
Review Team" shall analyze the proposed development and its potential impact on facilities and
services. The Special Purpose District Petition Review Team shall be comprised, at a minimum, of
members of the Planning, Utility, Finance, Parks and Recreation and Public Safety departments, and
the City Attorney's Office.
2. The Special Purpose District Petition Review Team shall review the application, consider the approval
criteria, and assign a Case Manager to lead the review and prepare a report to the Planning and Zoning
Commission and/or appropriate board or commission, and City Council.
3. Review of a request for a District within the city limits shall be reviewed in conjunction with a zoning
request for a Planned Unit Development District demonstrating enhanced development standards, and
consistent with applicable City codes and policies adopted by the City Council.
4. Review of a request for a District within the within the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) shall be
reviewed in conjunction with terms for enhanced development standards and consistency with
applicable City policies adopted by the City Council.
D. Board or Commission Review.
The Planning and Zoning Commission or other appropriate board or commission, shall hold a Public Hearing
and make a recommendation to the City Council.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 78 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:33 [EST]
E. City Council Final Action.
1. The City Council shall hold a Public Hearing and render a final decision on the request for a District.
2. All outstanding application, staff, and legal fees shall be paid in full to the City prior to the approval of a
District.
(Ord. No. 2019-01, § 2(Exh. A), 1-8-2019)
Sec. 3.26.030. Approval Criteria.
The City Council shall consider the following approval criteria when reviewing a request for the creation of a
District:
A. The request is consistent with Section 13.10.010, Municipal Utility District (MUD), Water Control and
Improvement District (WCID) or Fresh Water Supply District (FWSD), of this Code;
B. The request is consistent with all applicable City policies as adopted by the City Council; and
C. The request supports the following objectives.
1.Quality Development. The development meets or exceeds the intent of the development and design
standards of City codes;
2.Extraordinary Benefits. The development provides extraordinary public benefits that advance the
vision and goals of the Comprehensive Plan, such as, but not limited to, extension, financial
contribution, or enhancement of master planned infrastructure, diversity of housing, and
enhanced parks and open space that are available to the public;
3.Enhance Public Service and Safety. The development enhances public services and optimizes service
delivery through its design, dedication of sites, connectivity, and other features;
4.City Exclusive Provider. The development further promotes the City as the exclusive provider of
water, wastewater, solid waste, and electric utilities;
5.Fiscally Responsible. The development is financially feasible and doesn't impair the City's ability to
provide municipal services;
6.Finance Plan. The developer(s) contribute financially to cover a portion of infrastructure expenses
without reimbursement by the Districts or the City; and
7.Annexation. When applicable, the development will not impair the City's future annexation of the
Districts or adjacent property, or impose costs not mutually agreed upon.
(Ord. No. 2019-01, § 2(Exh. A), 1-8-2019)
SECTION 3.27. COURTHOUSE VIEW WAIVER
Sec. 3.27.010. Applicability.
A request for waiver from the requirements of the Courthouse View Protection Overlay standards of this Code, as
provided for within this Code, may be considered when a request does not meet the criteria for a Courthouse View
Exception.
(Ord. No. 2022-89 , § 2(Exh. A), 11-22-2022)
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 79 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:33 [EST]
Sec. 3.27.020. Initiation.
Initiation of the Courthouse Waiver request may be made upon submittal of a complete application by a property
owner or their designated agent.
(Ord. No. 2022-89 , § 2(Exh. A), 11-22-2022)
Sec. 3.27.030. Application and Completeness Determination.
The applicant shall submit all of the information required in the UDC Development Manual. The Director is
responsible for determining the completeness of an application submitted, pursuant to Section 3.02.040.
(Ord. No. 2022-89 , § 2(Exh. A), 11-22-2022)
Sec. 3.27.040. Staff Review.
A. The Director shall review the application, considering applicable criteria for approval, and prepare a report to
the City Council.
B. The Director may establish procedures for administrative review necessary to ensure compliance with this
Code and state statute.
C. The Director's report may include a recommendation for final action.
(Ord. No. 2022-89 , § 2(Exh. A), 11-22-2022)
Sec. 3.27.050. Final Action.
Following notice in accordance with Section 3.03, the City Council shall hold a public hearing in accordance with its
rules and state law and consider the Courthouse View Waiver, Director's report, compliance with this Code, and
take final action.
A. Approval of a Courthouse View Waiver for property located within the Downtown Overlay District shall
require a simple majority vote plus one additional vote of approval of the members present.
B. Approval of a Courthouse View Waiver for all other property located outside of the Downtown Overlay
District shall require a simple majority vote of the members present.
(Ord. No. 2022-89 , § 2(Exh. A), 11-22-2022)
Sec. 3.27.060. Approval Criteria.
A Courthouse View Waiver may be approved, conditionally approved. or disapproved. The following factors are
required for approval:
A. The existence of specific site opportunities or constraints.
The proposed waiver furthers goals of the comprehensive plan, and any applicable small area plans,
specific to the location of the property and furthers a specific implementation step(s) of the
comprehensive plan.
C. The waiver is not contrary to the public interest.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 80 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:33 [EST]
D. The request for a waiver creates a building height that is in scale with conforming uses of nearby
property and with the character of the neighborhood. When properties are located in a Historic
Overlay District the development has undergone a conceptual review by the Historic and Architectural
Review Committee (HARC) with general support for the building massing and form.
(Ord. No. 2022-89 , § 2(Exh. A), 11-22-2022)
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 81 of 81
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:33 [EST]
Exhibit C
- UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
Chapter 12 PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE CIRCULATION
Chapter 12 PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE CIRCULATION'
SECTION 12.01. GENERAL
Sec. 12.01.010. Purpose.
An integrated and interconnected vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle transportation network is essential for the
effective and reliable movement of people and goods. The standards in this Chapter ensure that streets function in
an interdependent manner, provide for accessibility and walkability, plan for emergency services, and provide
continuous and logical transportation routes. Streets shall be planned and constructed so that their arrangement,
size, character, and design is considered in relation to streets, topography, public safety and convenience, and an
appropriate relationship with the built environment. The City's Comprehensive Plan shall guide the location and
functionality of the transportation network.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 12.01.020. Authority.
The provisions of this Chapter are adopted pursuant to Texas Local Government Code chs. 211 and 212, and the
City Charter.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 12.01.030. Applicability.
A. The standards of this Chapter apply to development within the corporate limits and Extraterritorial
Jurisdiction (ETJ) of the City of Georgetown.
B. No subdivision, Site Development Plan or Stormwater Permit shall be approved until conformance to the
standards of this Code are demonstrated.
C. All required transportation improvements shall be designed in accordance with this Code and as detailed in
the adopted Construction Specifications and Standards Manual ("Construction Manual"), as amended, or any
other adopted construction standards provided by the Development Engineer. When the standards of this
Code and the Construction Manual conflict, the more stringent provision shall apply.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
'Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, adopted February 28, 2017, amended Chapter 12 in its entirety to read as
herein set out. Formerly, Chapter 12, Sections 12.01-12.05 pertained to similar subject matter, and derived
from original codification and Ord. No. 2016-17, § 2(Exh. A), adopted March 8, 2016.
Georgetown, Texas, Unified Development Code Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:57 [EST]
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 1 of 25
Sec. 12.01.040. Subdivision Variance.
A Subdivision Variance, pursuant to Section 3.22 of this Code, may be requested to the provisions of this Chapter
except Section 12.06, Design and Technical Standards, and 12.09, Traffic Impact Analysis.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
SECTION 12.02. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THOROUGHFARES
Regional thoroughfares provide linkages within the community and throughout the region. The City's
Comprehensive Plan includes an Overall Transportation Plan that is developed in conjunction with the Capital Area
Metropolitan Planning Organization's (CAMPO) long-range plan. Goals from the Overall Transportation Plan
include:
A. Improve the local street system, including new thoroughfare linkages to enhance connectivity,
improved and coordinated traffic signalization, and access management standards.
B. Provide a functional, integrated, multi -modal transportation system with a variety of choices.
C. Reduce reliance on single -occupant automobile traffic and enhance bicycle and pedestrian mobility and
accessibility by encouraging compact land use development.
D. Provide for a high degree of safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians and bicyclists.
E. Discourage primary traffic routing through local streets.
F. Preserve right-of-way for roadway development and expansion.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 12.02.010. General.
The precise alignment of thoroughfares included in the Overall Transportation Plan may be varied to allow for
locational adjustments that would increase the compatibility of the right-of-way with natural or man-made
features such as steep slopes, waterways, wildlife habitats, historic structures, existing development, or existing
streets. In unique circumstances, at the discretion of the Director, the amount of right-of-way expansion may be
reduced to accommodate natural or man-made features such as steep slopes, waterways, wildlife habitats, historic
structures, or existing development. Thoroughfares that are located in the Downtown Overlay District and are
constrained by historical patterns of development may be considered on a case -by -case basis by the Director and
may not conform to the ultimate street sections identified in Table 12.02.030.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 12.02.020. Developer Responsibilities.
It is necessary and desirable to obtain right-of-way for the public street network to support the needs of the
community. Developers share the responsibility of providing adequate streets through compliance with the
minimum standards governing internal and perimeter streets, and the requirement of the Transportation
Impact Fee in Chapter 12.46 of the Code of Ordinances if within the service area boundaries pursuant to
Section 12.46.060 of the Code of Ordinances. The developer shall be responsible for the dedication and
improvement of internal and adjacent comprehensive plan thoroughfares in accordance with the standards of
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:56 [EST]
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 2 of 25
the street classifications described in this Section. The developer is responsible for all costs of materials,
design, and construction of the public improvements required by this Code.
A. The continuation of all existing streets and those included in the Overall Transportation Plan, approved
plat, concept plan, or other City -approved document depicting a planned street shall be provided by
the developer.
B. Minimum right-of-way standards shall be in accordance with Table 12.02.030. If the thoroughfare is a
boundary street, one-half of the balance between the street's existing right-of-way and the
street/intersection right -of way required shall be required per Table 12.02.030. Where the
thoroughfare is internal to the property, the full section of right-of-way shall be required.
C. In addition to the minimum right-of-way standards in Table 12.02.030, right-of-way reservation may be
required for thoroughfares expressly stated in the City's Overall Transportation Plan. Additionally,
reservation could be required for County and State roadway plans that exceed the City's minimum
right-of-way standards. The Development Engineer may also seek additional right-of-way and/or
easements for drainage, utilities, slopes, etc. necessary to facilitate the construction of a roadway.
D. Improvements to comprehensive plan streets, in accordance with Subsection 12.09.030.F., shall be the
responsibility of the developer unless otherwise provided. A developer is not responsible for
construction of any bridge structure at the boundary of the subdivision if the bridging of such a street
does not immediately connect to the network. A pro-rata contribution towards the future construction
of the bridge may be required, as determined by a Traffic Impact Analysis.
E. There must be a rough proportionality between the traffic impacts created by a new development and
the associated mitigation requirements.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 12.02.030. Comprehensive Plan Streets.
The following table provides general standards for typical Comprehensive Plan regional transportation facilities. All
rights -of -way listed in the table are minimum dimensions and additional right-of-way and/or easements may be
required by the Development Engineer due to drainage, utilities, or construction necessity. Street width
dimensions are measured from back -of -curb to back -of -curb and include travel lanes, bicycle lanes, and curb and
gutter. Landscape lots and commercial signage are prohibited within any part of the right-of-way of a
comprehensive plan street or trail. Full dimensional cross -sections for each street classification and corridor -
specific alternatives can be found in the Chapter 12 Appendix. Utility assignments can be found within the
Construction Manual.
Table 12.02.030 Comprehensive Plan Street and Trail Standards
Regional
Trail
Major
Collector
Minor
Arterial
Major
Arterial
Expressway
Average Daily Trip (ADT)
Projected Range
2,501-12,500
12,501-
24,000
24,001+
2000*
Design Speed (mph)'
--
35
40
45
75
Right-of-way (min. feet)
20
94
110
135
350
Right-of-way at intersections
(min. feet)2
--
94
134
159
350
Travel Lanes (number of)
—
4
4
6
10
Travel Lane Width (feet)
--
11
11
12
12
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 3 of 25
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:56 [EST]
Bicycle Lanes (feet)'
--
3
3
3
3
Street Width total (feet)
10
60
66
90
164
Median Width (min. feet)
—
10
16
16
16
Parking
—
Prohibited
Prohibited
Prohibited
Prohibited
Sidewalks (min. feet)
10
10
10
10
10
Sidewalk clear zone (min.
feet)
TxDOT
Design
Manual
TxDOT
Design
Manual
TxDOT
Design
Manual
TxDOT
Design
Manual
TxDOT
Design
Manual
Public Utility Easement (min.
feet)
—
15
15
15
15
Table Notes
1. Design and geometry of all streets, including speed adjustments, can be found in Section 12.06.
2. Right-of-way at intersections for Arterial streets are increased according to the table for a distance of
200 feet from the right-of-way of the intersecting street.
3. Bicycle lanes are to be combined with sidewalks into a shared -use Path (SUP) . Clear Zone shall meet
the TxDOT Design Manual.
4. The City may consider alternative striping on all comprehensive plan roadways to allow for on -street
parking, narrower lane widths, alternative bike lane design, etc. whether in an interim or permanent
situation. In the event that the City adopts a specific street corridor design or overlay that differs from
the design standards in Section 12.02 and 12.03, any approved cross-section(s) associated with that
street can be found in the Chapter 12 Appendix.
* 2000 passenger cars per hour per lane (pcphpl)
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
SECTION 12.03. LOCAL AND NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS
The neighborhood street network shall form an organized, connected pattern that defines the community both
functionally and visually. When possible, streets should be designed to respect natural features and topography to
reduce grading, promote pedestrian movement, and minimize crossing of open space. In addition, streets should
generally be short in length, include cross -street access, and incorporate traffic calming design elements to
promote safety and discourage speeding. Local and Neighborhood streets serve both residential and non-
residential uses.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 12.03.010. Developer Responsibilities.
The developer shall be responsible for the dedication and improvement of all local and neighborhood streets in
accordance with the standards of the street classifications described in the following section. Where existing right-
of-way does not meet the minimum standards, right-of-way shall be dedicated to meet the minimum requirement.
The developer shall provide for the continuation of all existing streets and those included in the Overall
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 4 of 25
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:56 [EST]
Transportation Plan, approved plat, concept plan, or other City -approved document depicting a planned street.
The developer is responsible for all costs of materials, design, and construction of the public improvements
required by this Code.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 12.03.020. Public and Private Streets.
All newly created streets shall be constructed to local street standards. Private streets shall include a street
maintenance agreement, in a form acceptable to the City, tied to the approved final plat.. Alleys shall be privately
owned and maintained. All subdivisions, regardless of the use of a public or private street, shall meet the street
network requirements of Sec. 12.05.010.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 12.03.030. Local and Neighborhood Streets.
The following table provides general standards for local and neighborhood streets. Average Daily Trips (ADT) are
utilized as a planning tool for a projected development, while Level of Service (LOS) is used as a measurement of
functioning roadway adequacy once the street is in operation. All rights -of -way listed in the table are minimum
dimensions and additional right-of-way and/or easements may be required by the Development Engineer due to
drainage, utilities, or construction necessity. Street width dimensions are measured from back -of -curb to back -of -
curb and include travel lanes, parking lanes, and curb and gutter. Full dimensional cross -sections for each street
classification can be found in the Chapter 12 Appendix and utility assignments can be found within the
Construction Manual.
Table 12.03.030 Local and Neighborhood Street Standards
Alley
Residential
Local
Local
Local
Local
Residential
Neighborhood
Lane
Street
Street-
Street-
Street-
Collector
Collector
Tree
Rural/Estate
Downtown
(alt.)
Average Daily Trip
-
1-800
1-800
1-800
1-800
N/A
801-
801-2,500
(ADT) Projected Range
1,400
Design Speed (mphl
30
30
30
25
30
30
30-35
Right-of-way (min.
20
40
50
52-62
50
60
60
60
feet)
(private)
Street Width Total
15
22
30-321
32
26
38
36
28
(feet)
Parking
Prohibited
Limited
2 Sides
2 Sides
1 Side
2 Sides
2 Sides
Prohibited
Sidewalks (min. feet)
5
5
5
-
6-103
5
5
Sidewalk clear zone
- -
Optional
Optional
Varies'
6
Varies3
5
10
(min. feet)
Driveways Permitted
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Limited'
No'
Intersection Spacing
1,500
1,320
1,320
1,320
1,320
N/A
1,320
2,000
(max, feet)
Public Utility Easement
--
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
(min. feet)
Table Notes
1. Local Streets vary in street width depending on curb type, in accordance with Subsection 12.06.E.
2 Residential Lanes require companion alleys to provide access to the lots fronting on the lane. Cut-out parallel parking for
temporary loading and visitor parking is allowed with additional right-of-way.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 5 of 25
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:56 [EST]
3. Sidewalks in the Downtown Overlay shall follow width, materials, and standards in Subsection 12.04.030.13.
4. Sidewalk clear zone (separation from curb) varies by the size of tree wells described in Subsection 12.06.G.
5. Residential Collectors are subject to the driveway separation requirements pursuant to Section 12.08.
6. Neighborhood Collectors shall not have residential lots fronting on the street, nor permitted access to residential lots. Only
access to parkland, amenity centers, or common areas is permitted.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
SECTION 12.04. ALTERNATIVE STREETS
Alternative street designs may be warranted at times when streets are located in areas that call for contextual
solutions based on density, land use, and pedestrian environment.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 12.04.010. Residential Rural Estate Streets.
A. Streets.
Local Streets within a Residential Rural/Estate subdivision may be constructed to a 26-foot street width.
Within the City's designated fire service area, on -street parking is restricted in accordance with the adopted
fire code. Rural/Estate streets located in the ETJ may be designed to 25 mph speeds and constructed with a
ribbon curb to allow for sheet flow or open -ditch stormwater drainage. Rural/Estate Streets in the ETJ
require a stop condition every 1,500 feet which include, but is not limited to, a stop or yield sign,
roundabout, or other approved traffic -calming measure.
Sidewalks.
Sidewalks within Residential Rural/Estate subdivisions shall be constructed on both sides of all collector -level
and higher -classification streets, including perimeter Arterial streets. Sidewalks may be located within a
public utility easement and may meander in and out of the right-of-way. Sidewalks within a Residential
Rural/Estate subdivision shall be constructed at the time of street improvements and shall not be deferred to
the building permit. An alternative pedestrian plan including a trail system in lieu of sidewalks may be
considered by the Director. Maintenance of the sidewalks shall be determined upfront by the governmental
entity responsible for the street.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 12.04.020. Local Street —Street Tree Alternative.
Street trees are permitted in a street right-of-way only when planted in a street right-of-way approved for street
trees. All other trees planted along streets shall be located in the front yard of the lot. Trees approved for
designated street rights -of -way shall be planted within a parkway strip that is sized and equipped with designated
root barrier treatments in accordance with Section 12.06.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 12.04.030. Downtown Overlay District Streets.
All streets and sidewalks located within the Downtown Overlay District shall comply with the Downtown Master
Plan, as amended. Within the Downtown Overlay District, the developer shall be responsible for the dedication of
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 6 of 25
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:56 [EST]
one-half of the remaining right-of-way and construction of landscaping, sidewalks, lighting and other features of
the Downtown Master Plan, where such improvements are non-existent or in need of re -construction. If a
development is approved for parking to be located within the right-of-way, the developer shall be responsible for
any necessary paving and/or intersection improvements to conform to the standards of Subsection A. below.
The Director may consider a lesser right-of-way and/or street design when existing structures, trees, or other
objects preclude the expansion to the minimum right-of-way. In such instance, the Director may consider reduced
lanes, alternative on -street parking configurations, or other alternative design.
A. Street Standards.
1. All local streets located within the Downtown Overlay District shall meet the minimum right-of-way
and pavement widths in Table 12.03.030. Downtown Local Streets shall be designed with parallel
parking inset by intersection bulb -outs on each side of the street and one travel lane in each
direction.
2. Streets uniquely identified within the Downtown Master Plan shall be dedicated and constructed
according to the cross-section in the Downtown Master Plan.
3. Intersection crosswalks shall be constructed, at a minimum, as Type B crosswalks, as depicted in the
Chapter 12 Appendix. Street lighting shall be in accordance with Section 12.06 of this Code.
Sidewalks and Trees.
1. Sidewalks located within the Downtown Overlay District shall be at least six feet wide and
constructed according to the design standards of a Level III Sidewalk, as described in the
Downtown Master Plan and depicted in the Construction Manual. Level III sidewalks shall include
a four -foot vegetated strip between the curb and sidewalk when not adjacent to head -in or
angled street parking. If a sidewalk is identified in the Downtown Master Plan as a Level I or II
sidewalk, it shall be constructed accordingly.
2. Street Trees shall be required at a general spacing of 40 feet for Shade Trees and 20 feet for
Ornamental Trees. The Director may consider alternative spacing, species, and location based on
existing conditions. Shade Trees shall be planted in a parkway strip or tree well that is sized and
equipped with underground root barrier treatments in accordance with Section 12.06. Approved
Ornamental Trees shall not require root barrier treatments.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 12.04.040. Conservation Subdivision Streets.
Local Streets within a designated Conservation Subdivision (per Section 11.06 of this Code) may be constructed to
a 26-foot street width. Within the City's designated fire service area, on -street parking is restricted in accordance
with the adopted fire code. The parking lane shall be inset from the travel lanes using bulb -out curb design
measuring 15x6 feet at each intersection and at 300-foot intervals. The City may consider limited drainage
alternatives such as bioswales and landscaped filtration techniques in conjunction with ribbon curbs for
Conservation Subdivision Streets.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 12.04.050. Context Sensitive Streets.
The City's Overall Transportation Plan encourages design flexibility for comprehensive plan streets to
accommodate the existing built environment or desired development. Context Sensitive Street (CSS) alternative
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 7 of 25
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:56 [EST]
cross -sections are provided within this Code to account for settings that contain a mixture of uses, densities, and
building types that may affect pedestrian and bicycle patterns, speed limits, and on -site parking options. As an
alternative to the standard street types for comprehensive plan roads and neighborhood streets, the CSS cross -
sections identified in the Chapter 12 Appendix and in a Mixed -Use (MU) Zoning District per Section 4.09 of this
Code may be considered as design options for development with this Code.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
SECTION 12.05. SUBDIVISION AND STREET DESIGN
To further the goals of the Overall Transportation Plan of an interconnected street network, new streets shall be
integrated into existing and planned streets. New subdivisions shall account for primary and secondary entry
points into a subdivision, connect to streets stubbed from adjacent properties, and provide for a neighborhood
street layout focused on the safety of vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. Street network connections shall be
made based on the number of proposed residential or commercial lots/units, the size and configuration of the
land, and the type of streets constructed. Connection locations shall be depicted on the Preliminary Plat, concept
plan, if applicable, and any associated phasing plans, and shall conform to the standards detailed below.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 12.05.010. Street Network Connections.
A Connections to Major Streets.
All non-residential and residential lots and multi -family complexes shall have direct or indirect access to an
existing major street, defined as a Major Collector, Minor Arterial and Major Arterial. Table 12.05.010 is used
to determine how many connections to an existing major street(s) are required, based on the number of lots
or units. For the purposes of this Section, lots and multi -family units are interchangeable for determining
connections to existing major streets. Multi -family developments do not require more than two total
connections.
Table 12.05.010
Minimum lots/Units
Connections to Existing
Major Streets
1-29
1
30-79
1 + Fire Code access
80-499
2
500 +
3
If a subdivision or multi -family development does not directly connect to an existing major street, the
number of connections can be satisfied through existing local streets as long as there are enough distinct,
continuous routes to a major street through adjacent development to meet the requirements. In that
situation, the number of lots in the table shall encompass the total accumulated number of lots or units
sharing the street connections to the major street(s), regardless of subdivision boundary.
B. Street Network Connections Required.
A proposed subdivision or development shall provide connections to the public street network in accordance
with Table 12.05.020, through either existing streets or by future street stubs to an adjacent property. The
minimum connections in Table 12.05.020 may be increased by further requirements in this Section, such as
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 8 of 25
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:56 [EST]
intersection spacing and street connectivity ratio. For the purposes of this Section, lots and multi -family units
are interchangeable for determining connections to existing major streets. Multi -family developments do not
require more than two total connections.
Table 12.05.020
Minimum
Lots/Units
Minimum Connections to
Existing or Future Streets
5
2
80
3
150
4
200
5
300
6
500
7
C. Additional Street Connection Requirements.
1. All existing streets in adjoining areas shall be connected and continued into the new subdivision in
alignment therewith, regardless of the number of street connections required. Practical downsizing or
upsizing of street widths, speeds, and design will be reviewed and permitted at the discretion of the
Development Engineer.
2. Whenever existing or future street connections are required, the right-of-way shall be extended and all
public improvements constructed to the property line boundary.
3. The Director can require that a proposed future street connection be shifted to a more suitable
location in order to minimize block length, discourage cut -through traffic, align compatible uses,
preserve trees, prevent reserve strips, and increase the likelihood of ultimate connection.
4. All Major Collector -designated streets and higher classifications shall connect or stub on both ends to
an existing or planned collector or higher -level street. All other collectors should generally connect to
another collector although, on a case -by -case basis, exceptions can be considered through an
Administrative Exception.
5. A street stub cannot be used as the basis of lot frontage and/or access for an adjoining lot. Street stubs
are intended only to continue through such property.
6. Streets that are planned to extend in the future shall be constructed with temporary turn-arounds
when the street stub exceeds 150 feet in length and shall be depicted on the plat as a temporary
easement. The following note should be placed on the plat: "Crosshatched area is temporary easement
for turn -around until street is extended." Temporary dead-end streets shall not exceed 500 feet.
Reserve strips at the end of streets are prohibited.
7. All street network connections shall be provided prior to the final phase of development.
8. A platted residential lot or portion thereof may not be used as a means to connect a proposed street to
an existing street or cul-de-sac in order to satisfy the requirements of this Section if the existing street
was not intended to connect to the adjacent land.
9. In addition to the minimum street network connection requirements, intersection spacing and
connectivity provisions in Section 12.05.020 may increase the total connections required.
D. Street Connection Credits.
Credits toward the minimum number of street connections are applicable only after the second existing
street connection has been satisfied. A Neighborhood Collector counts as two local street connections and a
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 9 of 25
Created: 2023-03-27 22:05:56 [EST]
Major Collector or higher -classification street counts as three local street connections, whether they are
constructed as either an existing or future street connection.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 12.05.020. Streets and Blocks.
A. Intersection Spacing.
Intersection spacing shall not exceed the lengths specified in Table 12.03.030 and adhere to the following
measurement and calculation standards:
1. Intersection spacing shall apply independently to each side of a street and shall be measured between
the centerlines of two through streets, both on the same side of the street segment to be measured.
2. Cul-de-sac and other non through -streets do not apply as an intersection when measuring length of
spacing.
3. Intersection spacing shall apply beyond each individual subdivision and measurements shall be
continued into the adjacent subdivision.
4. Intersection spacing requirements do not apply to Major Collector and higher -classification streets.
B. Mid -Block Pedestrian Connection.
Where intersection spacing is 1,000 feet or greater in length, a minimum 15-foot wide pass -through lot shall
be required near the mid -point of the block. The pass -through lot shall connect on both ends to a public
street and shall be owned and maintained by a designated property owner's association or similar entity.
Within the lot, a minimum six-foot wide sidewalk shall be constructed in an access easement and connect on
either end to public sidewalks.
C. Culs-de-sac.
A residential cul-de-sac shall not exceed 20 total lots or 500 feet in length, whichever is less. A cul-de-sac
exceeding 15 lots shall provide pedestrian access from the end of the cul-de-sac through to the nearest
public street, public school, sidewalk or trail, provided that such connection is located within the same
subdivision. A pass -through lot containing a minimum six-foot sidewalk in a public access easement shall
connect on both ends to a public street and shall be owned and maintained by a property owner's
association. A residential cul-de-sac is permitted only within a subdivision that has more than one public
street connection and shall not take access off of an arterial street.
D. Street Connectivity.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 10 of 25
Created: 2023-03-27 22:05:56 [EST]
The street network for any subdivision with internal roads or access to any public road shall achieve a connectivity
ratio of not less than 1.20. A Connectivity Ratio is achieved by taking the number of street links divided by the
number of nodes or end links, including cul-de-sac heads. A node is the terminus of a street or the intersection of
two or more streets. A link is any portion of a street defined by a node at each end or at one end. Streets
intersecting to an external collector or arterial street are not considered nodes, but are considered links. Street
stubs to an adjacent property are considered links, but alley intersections are not.
The adjacent graphic and sample calculation shows how the street connectivity ratio for a subdivision shall be
calculated.
Numbers (#) indicate Links ♦ = Nodes
13 links/11 nodes =1.18 ratio
(Does not meet required 1.20 ratio)
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 12.05.030. Inter -Parcel Connectivity.
All new commercial Site Development Plans and Stormwater Permits that require off-street parking and driveways
shall provide driveway connections to adjacent properties parallel to any street fronting the development,
whether such property is developed or undeveloped. Access Easements shall be provided where necessary to
achieve such a connection. The Director may adjust connection locations and consider alternative connections to
the rear where practical.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 12.05.040. Exceptions.
Exceptions to the requirements of Section 12.05 may be considered by Administrative Exception, Subdivision
Variance, or by the abandonment of a right-of-way, in compliance with this Code and the City's Municipal Code.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 11 of 25
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:56 [EST]
A. Administrative Exception.
The Director may consider an Administrative Exception during subdivision plat or site plan review for
the following situations only: If a natural or man-made barrier such as a highway, railroad, floodplain,
or severe topography would hinder the possibility of connection. The administrative exception shall not
apply to meeting the minimum connections to an existing major street, as specified in Table 12.05.010.
All other exceptions shall be processed as a Subdivision Variance or Street Abandonment.
B. Subdivision Variance.
A Subdivision Variance pursuant to Section 3.22 can be considered for proposed and required street
connections. The applicant shall demonstrate that all other administrative options have been
exhausted. The following are eligible for Subdivision Variance consideration:
1. Number of required connections, type of street connection, land use compatibility, or location.
2. A local street that would connect a commercial/industrial development to a residential
development. In such instance, the applicant that is required or is proposing to make such a
connection is eligible to apply for the subdivision variance and must ensure that removal of such
a connection does not cause detrimental effects to the streets in the adjacent subdivision.
3. A connection that would cause an existing local street to exceed the Average Daily Trip (ADT)
projection specified in Table 12.03.030 and cause the Level of Service (LOS) on the existing street
to fall to Level "D" or worse, as determined through a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). The variance
should be considered when efforts to re-route traffic, alter street classifications, or consider
alternative connections have been exhausted.
C. Street Abandonment.
If not otherwise eligible for a Subdivision Variance or exception provided for in this Section, a City -
approved public street or street stub that is proposed by any party to be closed, disconnected or never
connected to another public street shall be submitted to the City Council for consideration of
abandonment, following the procedures in the City's Municipal Code. No public street, right-of-way, or
street approved by a plat shall be abandoned by the City or County if not in accordance with this Code.
The City and County will collectively determine whether to abandon the portion of a public street that
exists or is planned to be in both jurisdictions.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
SECTION 12.06. DESIGN AND TECHNICAL STANDARDS
Streets shall be designed in accordance with the design speed standards established in this Chapter in conjunction
with the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Manual, as amended.
When listed in this Section, the published standard shall apply. When this Section is silent, the AASHTO standard
shall apply.
A. Street Curves and Geometry.
1. Vertical curves shall be designed in accordance with AASHTO standards.
2. Horizontal curves shall be separated by a minimum tangent of 100 feet for Comprehensive Plan
Streets and 50 feet for all other streets.
3. Reverse curves shall be separated by a minimum tangent of 100 feet. Super -elevated curves shall not
be allowed.
4. Horizontal tangents approaching an intersection shall be a minimum of 50 feet in depth.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 12 of 25
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:57 [EST]
- UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
Chapter 12 - PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE CIRCULATION
SECTION 12.06. DESIGN AND TECHNICAL STANDARDS
5. Street landings shall be a minimum of 30 feet in depth with a grade of less than two percent (2%)
approaching an intersection.
6. Grade breaks shall not exceed one percent (1%) without a vertical curve.
7. Longitudinal grade shall be a minimum of one-half percent (0.5%) for streets using a curb and gutter
drainage system. Maximum grade shall conform to AASHTO criteria for all Comprehensive Plan
Streets and shall not exceed fifteen percent (15%) for all other streets.
8. Roundabouts and traffic circles shall be designed to accommodate emergency service vehicles and
busses. Encouraged on local streets, roundabouts shall require approval by the Development
Engineer for a collector -level street or higher classification.
9. Collectors shall generally follow a direct path and shall not turn in a perpendicular manner after a
stop or 90 degree bend, nor shall a collector end in a cul-de-sac or other permanent turn -around.
10. Exceptions to these standards, in addition to the design speeds for streets may be considered by
the Development Engineer on a case -by -case basis. Approved design speeds differing from the
statutory prima facie speed limits shall require signage in accordance with the Texas Manual on
Uniform Control Devices.
B. Intersection Alignment.
1. All streets shall intersect at a 90-degree angle. Deviations up to 15 degrees may be considered by the
Development Engineer on a case -by -case basis where existing conditions will not permit.
2. New streets and driveways intersecting a street across from existing street or driveway shall be
aligned with the existing street or driveway on center line with dimensions and bearings to show
relationship. In unique circumstances where the Development Engineer determines that precise
alignment of driveways, Local Streets, or Residential Collectors is impossible due to natural
features or other unique elements of the land, such off -sets may be included provided the
distance between center lines is not less than 125 feet.
C. Turning Radius.
1. Local street intersections with another local street shall include a minimum curb radii of 15 feet. All
collector street intersections with both local streets and other collectors shall include a minimum
curb radii of 25 feet. All arterial street intersections with any type of street shall include a
minimum curb radii of 30 feet.
2. Cul-de-sac streets shall have a minimum 60-foot right-of-way and a 50-foot paved radius for single -
and two-family uses, and 70-foot right-of-way and 60-foot paved radius for all other uses. Culs-
de-sac shall include a 25-foot inside, 50-foot outside turning radius. Hammerheads and other
turnaround alternatives shall meet the standards provided in the adopted Fire Code.
16
CI] 10
C11
C 2
3.Street intersections containing one or more Neighborhood Collector and higher -classification streets
shall include 25-foot right-of-way flares. The 25 feet is measured along the tangents from the
point of intersection of the two right-of-way lines.
Georgetown, Texas, Unified Development Code
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 13 of 25
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:57 [EST]
- UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
Chapter 12 - PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE CIRCULATION
SECTION 12.06. DESIGN AND TECHNICAL STANDARDS
D. Intersection Visibility and Sight Triangle.
I-•:3t.�CtE�M�ct
Y
I
\ I
1.For a street not containing the 25-foot right-of-way flare, a sight triangle visibility easement shall be
established at all street intersections to ensure street visibility. This area shall measure 25 feet
along the right-of-way in each direction from the projected intersection (shown as "x" and "y" in
the graphic). At the intersection of two local streets, however, the sight triangle can be measured
from the back of the curb or, where no curbs are in existence, the edge of the pavement. Where
the right-of-way/curb curves at the intersection, the tangents at the points of beginning for the
corner curve shall be projected to determine the origination of the sides of the sight triangle.
2.Within the sight triangle, no construction, planting, grading or other natural or manmade object,
including signs and human advertising, that interferes with street visibility shall be permitted
between the heights of three and eight feet, measured from the crown of the street, except as
approved by the Development Engineer.
3.The Development Engineer has the authority to extend the sight triangle based on speeds, pedestrian
facilities, and location of the painted stop bar at the intersecting street.
Furthermore, the Development Engineer may make a determination that objects interfering with
street visibility shall be removed or otherwise altered to restore visibility.
E. Street Curbs.
1.Approved street curb types are vertical, mountable, and ribbon curbs. Each curb type shall be
appropriate for the street classification, speed, drainage collection and meet the requirements of
this Chapter. All curbs, gutters, and inlets shall be designed and constructed in accordance with
the Construction Manual.
2.Comprehensive Plan Streets, Neighborhood Collectors, and any street within a Residential
Rural/Estate Subdivision may include ribbon curbs with approved drainage plans. All other streets
shall be constructed with mountable or vertical curbs unless approved by the Development
Engineer.
3.Local Streets and Residential Collectors may be constructed with either a mountable curb or vertical
curb. In accordance with Table 12.03.030 and the Local Street cross -sections located in the
Chapter 12 Appendix, streets constructed with a mountable curb have a street width of 30 feet
and streets constructed with a vertical curb have a street width of 32 feet.
4.Mountable and ribbon curbs require a clear zone safety separation between sidewalks, in accordance
with Section 12.07.
Georgetown, Texas, Unified Development Code
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 14 of 25
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:57 [EST]
- UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
Chapter 12 - PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE CIRCULATION
SECTION 12.06. DESIGN AND TECHNICAL STANDARDS
S.Curb Basis for all streets shall be a minimum of nine feet, measured from the back -of -curb to the
right-of-way line, to ensure that utilities, grading and drainage can be adequately provided.
Unless otherwise specified, the adjacent property owner is responsible for maintenance of all
pervious surface within this area, including grass, landscaping, trees, etc. per City Code Section
8.20.100. Encroachments into the right-of-way such as trees, landscaping, signage, and irrigation
shall require a License to Encroach unless specified by plat or maintenance agreement.
Street Lights.
1.Street lights shall be provided and installed by the subdivider on all public and private streets located
at intervals not exceeding 300 feet, at all street intersections, and at the terminus of a cul-de-sac,
except as otherwise specified herein. Subdivision of lots that do not require new streets shall also
provide street lights along existing streets if street lights are non-existent. The lighting type, size
of luminaire, mounting poles, location, and installation procedures shall be determined by the
City's Electrical Engineer or designee, in accordance with the standards in the Construction
Manual.
2.In a Residential Rural/Estate Subdivision, installation of street lights shall only be required at the
entrances to the subdivision. The subdivider shall be responsible for the installation and capping
of electrical conduits at all street intersections and cul-de-sacs within the subdivision so as to
allow for future installation of street lights. Elevated metering transmission structures may be
required within the subdivision to transmit utility meter readings.
3.In the Downtown Overlay District, street lights shall be provided using either the antique lighting or
standard light poles painted "Dark Green" in accordance with the Downtown Master Plan and the
Construction Manual.
G. Street Trees.
Trees are an important part of the streetscape and, when desired, should be planted according to the
context of a street. Shade trees required by this Code or desired by the homeowner shall typically be
planted outside of the right-of-way in the front yard except where otherwise restricted in this Code.
Shade trees planted within the right-of-way in the optional Local Street —Tree Option cross section
shall be considered a public improvement for construction purposes and be planted between a vertical
curb and sidewalk in accordance with the following criteria:
1.Six-foot minimum separation from both the curb and the sidewalk with a modular suspended
pavement framing system;
2.Eight-foot minimum separation with plastic root barriers; or
3.Ten-foot minimum separation between back of curb and sidewalk with no root barrier.
4.Approved Ornamental Trees shall not require root barrier treatments.
S.Approved Tree species shall be spaced approximately 40 feet apart, unless otherwise approved by
the Urban Forester on the Construction Plans.
6.All street trees shall be irrigated and maintained by the adjacent property owner, property owner
association, or special district, as designated in a plat note.
7.A maintenance agreement, license agreement and plat notes shall be established prior to recordation
of the final plat for the subdivision. The maintenance agreement shall dictate that repair to curbs
Georgetown, Texas, Unified Development Code
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 15 of 25
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:57 [EST]
- UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
Chapter 12 - PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE CIRCULATION
SECTION 12.06. DESIGN AND TECHNICAL STANDARDS
or sidewalks attributed to street tree root damage shall be the responsibility of the adjacent
property owner, property owner associated, or special district, as designated.
Mailbox Kiosks.
Communal mailbox kiosks facing a public street shall be provided direct pedestrian access from the
public sidewalk, be set back from the public sidewalk so as not to impede the walkway, and provide
either two pull -in parking spaces or a temporary loading zone that adequately accommodates two
vehicles. The right-of-way for the adjacent public street shall be sized appropriately for such features.
Construction Entrances.
Construction entrance/exit locations must be specified for all subdivision development. Construction
traffic for subdivision public improvements shall not be routed through adjacent neighborhood streets
except on rare occasions at the approval of the Development Engineer.
Street Naming.
1.5treets shall be named according to the City's Addressing and Naming Policy.
2.Streets shall be named so as to provide continuity of name with existing streets and so as to prevent
conflict with identical or similar names within the county.
3.Driveways or approved private streets serving more than one internal lot that connect to an Arterial
street shall be named and signed according to the City's Addressing and Street Naming Policy.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
SECTION 12.07. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE MOBILITY
Sec. 12.07.010. General.
All sidewalks and trails identified in this Code, the City's Sidewalk Master Plan, Overall Transportation Plan, Parks
Recreation and Open Space Master Plan, Trails Master Plan, Downtown Master Plan, and any other relevant plan
shall be constructed in accordance with this Code. Public sidewalks and trails do not count against the maximum
impervious cover percentage required in Section 11.02 of this Code.
A. Public Sidewalks.
1. Sidewalks shall be constructed on both sides of all streets, including frontage roads, at the minimum
widths described in Tables 12.03.030 and 12.04.020 of this Code. Sidewalks shall be constructed
consistent with the Construction Manual and in conformance with the requirements of the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
2. Sidewalks may be located within the street's public utility easement or right-of-way and may
meander in and out of either as approved by the Development Engineer. If located within the
PUE, a public access easement shall be granted by either the recording of a plat or separate
instrument, and shall be identified on any subsequent plans.
3. Sidewalks shall be installed and meet clear zone requirements per the TxDOT Roadway Design
Manual and shall be separated a minimum of six feet from the back of a ribbon curb . Sidewalk
Clear Zone minimums provided in Tables 12.02.030 and 12.03.010. Sidewalks have no required
separation from vertical curbs on a typical local street.
Georgetown, Texas, Unified Development Code
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 16 of 25
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:57 [EST]
4. Construction of public sidewalks on single-family and two-family lots may be deferred to the building
permit, built to the standards and specifications at the time of the permit. Sidewalks located in
common areas, parks and along Neighborhood Collectors shall be constructed at the time of
street improvements.
S. Pedestrian accessways shall be provided from the public sidewalk to the main entrance of each
building or to a sidewalk leading to the main entrance.
6. Sidewalks located within the Downtown Overlay District shall comply with the design standards in
Section 12.04 of this Code and the Downtown Master Plan, as amended.
7. Sidewalks constructed as infill, retrofitted, or rehabilitation projects should follow the standards of
this Chapter where practical to do so, but consideration shall be given to the existing conditions
of the built and natural environment when locating such sidewalks.
B. Public Trails.
Regional Trails depicted on the Trails Master Plan shall be dedicated and constructed at the time of
development as a public improvement in the general locations and alignments depicted therein.
1. If the trail is not located on public property, a minimum of 20 feet of right-of-way or public access
easement, shall be dedicated as approved by the Director of Parks and Recreation.
2. The trail shall be a minimum of ten feet in width, constructed to the standards depicted in the Trails
Master Plan, or otherwise approved by the Director of Parks and Recreation.
3. A trail constructed to the City's trail standards may be constructed within the right-of-way or public
utility easement as a substitute for a street sidewalk if the Trails Master Plan designates a trail
along the street.
C. On -Street Bicycle Lanes.
Bicycle facilities are required along Major Collectors and Arterials at the minimum widths specified in
Table 12.02.030. On Arterial streets, bicycle accommodations are recommended in a shared -use path
off of the vehicular travel lanes for the safety of the cyclists, though the approved cross -sections in
Appendix A allow for on -street striped lanes as well. Design and construction of all bicycle facilities
shall meet or exceed standards set forth in the City's Overall Transportation Plan.
D. Sidewalk Fund.
A designated City fund, entitled "Sidewalk Fund," shall hold any financial contributions paid in
accordance with the provisions in this Code. Funds shall be held in trust by the City to be used
exclusively for the purpose of purchasing and/or equipping public streets for sidewalks.
E. Alternative Pedestrian Improvements.
1. Alternative locations or design variation(s) of sidewalks, pedestrian access facilities, or hike and bike
trails to a standard that deviates from the Construction Manual can be requested to the
Development Engineer. If approved, ownership and maintenance shall be transferred to the
property owner or property/homeowner association and recorded by separate instrument, along
with a public access agreement.
2. When an administrative alternative cannot be achieved, a Subdivision Variance pursuant to Section
3.22 may be requested for either fees -in -lieu of construction, delay of construction, or waiver.
Justifications for the variance include, but are not limited to, the location of the facility in relation
to the existing or planned pedestrian network, the need for the facility, and/or
topography/natural features. Prior to approval of the Final Plat, Site Development Plan, or other
applicable approval stage, payment of any required fees shall be provided for deposit into the
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 17 of 25
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:57 [EST]
Sidewalk Fund at a cost not to exceed one hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of the estimated
construction plan costs, as approved by the Development Engineer. A request may be made to
City Council for City participation in any pedestrian improvements required by this Chapter.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
SECTION 12.08. DRIVEWAY STANDARDS
All driveways accessing a street shall require a permit through either a Building Permit, Stormwater Permit, Site
Development Plan, or Driveway Access Permit, in accordance with this Code. The Development Engineer may use
discretion on exact driveway spacing distance and location, where warranted. A lot approved in accordance with
this Code has the right to at least one driveway access point, which may or may not be full -access depending on
conditions. A driveway may provide access to no more than four lots before a street is required.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 12.08.010. Residential Driveways.
Single-family and two-family platted lots shall only take access from an alley, local street, residential lane, or
residential collector and shall not take access road that contains a County number (Ex. CR 425), arterial, or
highway.
Residential driveways on a local street serving single-family or two-family lots shall be separated from a
street intersection by a minimum of 50 feet, measured from the right-of-way to the center of the driveway.
Residential lots with frontage on more than one non -intersecting street shall take access from the street with
the lower classification, if applicable.
3. Residential driveways on a Residential Collector serving single-family or two-family lots shall be spaced a
minimum of 70 feet on center and shared driveways are not permitted.
Exceptions to this provisions include:
a. Does not apply to alley -loaded only lots fronting on Residential Collectors.
b. Does not apply if less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the linear street frontage contains front -
loaded lots.
c. Distance separation may be reduced to 55 feet if only one side of the street is front -loaded or if the
street is divided by a median.
d. A platted lot that is 90 feet or greater in width located on a collector -level or higher street may be
allowed a second driveway access point irrespective of the 70-foot separation provision, in full
accordance with all setback provisions.
e. Slip roads that provide public access along a private driveway serving multiple residential lots,
provided that the slip road access to the collector meets the separation.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 12.08.020. Non -Residential Driveways.
Non -Residential driveways shall be no wider than 30 feet, except where a median is present within the
driveway. When a median is desired or required, the driveway width shall not exceed 45 feet and the median
shall be constructed with a mountable curb. On streets operated by the Texas Department of Transportation
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 18 of 25
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:57 [EST]
(TxDOT), the Development Engineer may defer to TOOT in circumstances where these standards are not
practical.
2. Non -Residential full -access driveways shall be separated from a street intersection and from other driveways
in accordance with Table 12.08.020, measured on center or from the right-of-way to the center of the
driveway. Minimum separation for right -in, right -out -only driveways shall be determined by the
Development Engineer on a case -by -case basis, but in no case be spaced less than 200 feet from a street or
driveway.
3. Where multiple access points to a site or are desired, the Development Engineer shall have the authority to
require the consolidation, closure, or relocation of an existing or planned driveway, even if consistent with
the minimum spacing in Table 12.08.020.
4. Non -Residential driveways on double -frontage lots located in a Residential Zoning District shall have
offsetting access points from opposing streets to inhibit cut -through traffic.
5. A Driveway Access Permit may require an engineering study or a Traffic Impact Analysis in accordance with
Section 3.19 of this Code.
Table 12.08.020 Driveway Spacing
Non -Residential Driveway Spacing
Posted Speed (MPH)
Driveway Spacing (Feet)
<_30
200
35
250
40
305
45
360
50
425
55
495
60
570
65
645
70
730
Minimum Connection Spacing Criteria for Highway Frontage Roads
Minimum Connection Spacing (feet)
Posted Speed (MPH)
One -Way Frontage Roads
Two -Way Frontage Roads
530
200
200
35
250
300
40
305
360
45
360
435
>50
425
510
Desirable Spacing between Highway Exit Ramps and Driveways
Total Volume
Driveway or
Spacing (feet)
(Frontage Road +
Side Street
Ramp) (vph)
Volume (vph)
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 19 of 25
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:57 [EST]
Number of Weaving Lanes
2
3
4
< 2500
< 250
460
460
560
> 250
520
460
560
> 750
790
460
560
> 1000
1000
460
560
>2500
< 250
920
460
560
> 250
950
460
560
> 750
1 1000
1 600
690
> 1000
1 1000
1 1000
1000
. The standards in this table are derived from the City of Georgetown Driveway Spacing Study, adopted July 2001
and based on AASHTO sight distance standards; and the City of Georgetown Access Management Policy, adopted
December 2003.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
SECTION 12.09. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Sec. 12.09.010. Purpose.
To ensure that development impacts are mitigated through specified constructed public improvements and/or
financial contributions thereto and that such requirements are proportional to the traffic demands created by a
new development. There must be a rough proportionality between the traffic impacts created by a new development
and the associated impact requirements placed on the property owner.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 12.09.020. Applicability.
The road adequacy regulations in this Section apply to land development activities within the City limits and within
the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction, as specified in this Section. In addition to these road adequacy regulations,
Transportation Impact Fees, as required in Chapter 12.46 of the Code of Ordinances, shall be required for land
within the transportation service areas as defined in Section 12.46.060 of the Code of Ordinances.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
Sec. 12.09.030. Traffic Impact Analysis.
A. When Required.
A Traffic Impact Analysis shall be required with any application for a subdivision, Site Plan, Stormwater
Permit, or Driveway Permit, for which the proposed development generates traffic in excess of 2,000
average daily trips, based upon the latest edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip
Generation Manual. When a development is within the transportation service areas as defined in
Chapter 12.46.060 of the Code of Ordinances, a Traffic Impact Analysis shall only be required when the
proposed development generates traffic in excess of 5,000 daily trips. In the event that specific land
uses for the development are not specified at the time of subdivision or plat application, the daily trip
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 20 of 25
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:57 [EST]
generation rate for the most intensive land use from the ITE Manual for the land use classification of
the application shall be used to compute the estimated average daily trips.
2. The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) shall be prepared by a licensed professional in accordance with
standard transportation engineering practices for purposes of determining the adequacy of the road
network to serve the proposed development, and whether off -site road dedication and improvements
should be made to mitigate the effects of the development proposed in the application.
3. An initial Traffic Impact Analysis shall be submitted with the first application for the development that
triggers the requirement. An updated Traffic Impact Analysis shall be submitted with each Final Plat
submitted for approval and shall be generally consistent with the initial Traffic Impact Analysis. The
initial Traffic Impact Analysis shall be updated whenever a subdivision plat or Site Plan is modified to
authorize more intensive development.
Study Scope.
When a Traffic Impact Analysis is required, the scope of the analysis shall be determined during a scoping
meeting with the Development Engineer. The scoping meeting may occur during any required pre -
application meeting, but may also be scheduled after an initial pre -application meeting. No application
requiring a Traffic Impact Analysis may be made until the scope of the required analysis has been
determined. The Development Engineer may involve representatives of or request assessments from other
agencies and departments. The elements to be determined during the scoping session shall include the
following.
1. Definition of Impact Area.
The points of access and key streets and intersections that may be affected by development of the
subject tract constitute the impact area. Traffic recorder and turning movement assessment locations
shall be determined.
2. Period of Analysis.
Periods of analysis shall include: average daily traffic, peak AM and PM, or weekend peak hour.
3. Analysis Scenarios.
Scenarios for analysis include: existing conditions, opening year conditions with and without
development, and ten years after opening with and without development.
4. Process.
Process for determining trip generation and distribution including: trip generation category, diversion
assumptions, distribution assumptions, and capacity analysis.
5. Growth Rate Assumption.
The rate of growth assumed in background traffic assumptions.
6. Future Development.
Planned developments in the area that have been approved or are under review.
C. Traffic Study Elements.
A letter report or special report shall only include those elements agreed upon in the scoping meeting. A full
Traffic Impact Study shall include the following elements.
Existing Condition Survey.
Street System Description.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 21 of 25
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:57 [EST]
The street system shall be described including geometric features, lane usage, traffic control,
signage, sight distances, and adjacent uses and curb cuts.
b. Traffic Volumes.
Existing traffic volumes shall be provided for the impact area including both ADT (Average Daily
Traffic) and "Design" peak hour volumes. ADT shall be derived from the latest available counts
taken by the City or Texas Department of Transportation. Peak hour volumes shall be obtained
from field counts. Data shall be adjusted for daily and seasonal variations. Turning movement
counts for the peak hour shall be provided for critical intersections. Peak hour periods shall be as
determined at the scoping meeting.
C. Capacity Analysis.
Existing capacity of signalized and unsignalized intersections.
d. Other.
Other items may be required at the discretion of the Director depending upon the type and scale
of the project. These may include but are not limited to: queue length analysis, pedestrian
counts, accident data, traffic speeds (both 50th and 85th percentile), and stopping sight
distances.
2. Future Without Development.
Capacity analysis is to be provided for opening year and plus ten-year for key intersections (and street
segments where appropriate) without the development but including any planned developments. The
analysis shall be based upon the Highway Capacity Manual or other methodologies approved in
advance by the Director.
3. Future with Development.
a. Projections of the daily and peak hour traffic generation of the project shall be made using the
latest edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual unless the Director determines that locally
derived data will provide more accurate forecasts. Data from similar facilities may be used where
the information is not available from ITE.
b. The projected trips shall be distributed onto the road network as agreed in the scoping meeting.
C. Capacity analysis for opening year and plus ten-year for key intersections (and street segments
where appropriate).
d. Special analysis as may be required to determine warrants for signalization, minimum safe sight
distances, gap analysis, turning radius requirements, queue length analysis, turning lane length
analysis, curb cut locations, or similar requirements.
4. Mitigation Plan.
Where the analysis indicates that the project will create deficiencies in the impact area, improvements
shall be recommended which shall include projected cost estimates. The design of improvements shall
be in accordance with specifications of the Development Engineer and, where appropriate, the Texas
Department of Transportation. The mitigation plan shall also include any dedications necessary to
comply with the Minimum Road Standards described below. Where -the final approval authority for any
procedure determines that a mitigation plan is not adequate to address the traffic impacts of the
project, it may serve as a basis for denial of the permit or subdivision plat. Mitigation plans shall
identify improvements that are eligible for TIF credits per Chapter 12.46 of the Code of Ordinance. All
improvements identified shall be required, subject to the roughly proportionate impact of
development.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 22 of 25
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:57 [EST]
E. Consultants.
The City may require that an independent licensed professional traffic engineer be hired by the applicant to
perform the required Traffic Impact Analysis or to review all or part of a study prepared by the applicant's
consultants.
Minimum Road Standards.
All applications for plat approval, Site Plan approval, or PUD rezoning shall provide for adequate roads to
support proposed development through compliance with the following minimum standards governing
dedication and improvement of internal streets and adjacent thoroughfares. For purposes of this Section
"adjacent thoroughfares" shall include thoroughfares abutting the proposed subdivision, whether located
within the boundaries of the subdivision or within public rights -of -way.
1. Standards and Specifications.
The property owner shall dedicate and improve all required rights -of -way for internal streets and
adjacent thoroughfares required by these regulations in accordance with the classification of streets
contained in the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Dedication and Improvement of Internal Roadways and Adjacent Thoroughfares.
The property owner shall dedicate and improve one-half of the right-of-way necessary to meet
the specification in the Comprehensive Plan.
b. The City may require additional land and improvements for rights -of -way for adjacent
thoroughfares where necessary to achieve adequacy of the road network and where such
additional land and improvements are proportional to the traffic impacts generated by the
proposed development, depending on factors such as the impact of the development on the
adjacent thoroughfare, the timing of development in relation to need for the thoroughfare, and
the likelihood that adjoining property will develop in a timely manner.
C. In the case of adjacent frontage or service roads for State and Federally designated highways, the
property owner shall dedicate sufficient right-of-way and make authorized improvements in
order to provide an adequate road network to serve the development.
3. Substandard Street Improvements.
Where an existing thoroughfare that does not meet the City's right-of-way or design standards abuts a
proposed new development, the City may require the property owner to dedicate the right-of-way for
a standard thoroughfare width, and to improve the street according to the dimensions and
specifications in the Comprehensive Plan or Sections 12.02 and 12.03 of this Code, depending on
factors such as the impact of the development on the thoroughfare, the timing of development in
relation to need for the thoroughfare, and the likelihood that adjoining property will develop in a
timely manner.
4. Capital Improvements Plan for Roads.
A road improvement may be considered adequate for an application if the required improvement is
included, funded, and approved in the City's, County's or State's two-year capital improvements plan
for roads or if the improvement is included, funded, and approved in the City's, County's, or State's
three- to five-year capital improvements plan for roads, provided that the applicant agrees to phase
development to conform to such scheduled improvement. This Section shall not be construed to
prevent the City from requiring dedication of rights -of -way for such roads or from assigning trips to
such roads in a traffic impact study in order to determine a development project's proportionate costs
of improvements.
5. Participation in Costs of Improvements.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 23 of 25
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:57 [EST]
The City may participate in the costs of improvements required by this Section in order to achieve
proportionality between the traffic impacts created by the proposed development and the obligation
to provide adequate streets. In such cases, the property owner shall be responsible for the entire initial
costs of road improvements, including design costs. Reimbursement of the City's agreed share of the
costs shall be made as funds become available. The construction of improvements and the provisions
for participation in costs by the City shall be included in a subdivision improvement agreement.
G. City Evaluation and Action.
The City shall evaluate the adequacy of the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by the applicant. Based
upon such evaluation, the City shall determine (1) whether the application may be approved in the
absence of dedication of rights -of -way or construction of improvements to each affected thoroughfare,
and (2) the extent of the applicant's obligations to make such dedications or improvements. The City
shall condition the approval of the subdivision application on one or more of the following
performances by the applicant:
1. Delay or phasing of development until thoroughfares with adequate capacity or intersection
improvements are constructed;
2. A reduction in the density or intensity of the proposed development sufficient to assure that the road
network has adequate capacity to accommodate the additional traffic to be generated by the
development;
3. The dedication or construction of thoroughfares or traffic control improvements needed to mitigate
the traffic impacts generated by the proposed development.
Deferral of Obligation.
Upon request of the applicant or property owner, the obligation to dedicate or improve thoroughfare rights -
of -way or to make intersection improvements imposed on an application may be deferred to a later stage of
the development process.
As a condition of deferring the obligation to dedicate rights -of -way for or to improve thoroughfares, which
deferral shall be in the sole discretion of the City, the City shall require the developer to execute a
subdivision improvement agreement specifying the amount and timing of the rights -of -way dedication or
improvements to thoroughfares.
Cash Contributions.
In lieu of the obligation to dedicate or improve thoroughfares or make traffic control improvements to
achieve road adequacy, the applicant may propose to make equivalent cash contributions based upon the
development project's proportionate share of the costs of improvements, which the City in its sole discretion
may accept in satisfaction of road adequacy standards in this Section. Any funds accepted by the City shall be
earmarked for construction of the improvements for which the contribution was made.
Options.
Whenever the proposed development's share of the costs of a thoroughfare or traffic control improvement
needed to mitigate traffic generated by the development is less than one hundred percent (100%), the City in
its sole discretion may do the following:
1. Participate in the excess costs; or
Aggregate the costs of improving multiple thoroughfares or intersections identified in the Traffic
Impact Analysis, and require improvements to only some of the thoroughfares or intersections affected
by the development.
K. Appeal of Traffic Impact Analysis Conditions.
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 24 of 25
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:57 [EST]
Any appeal of a disapproved or denied final action resulting, in full or in part, from a determination that the
Mitigation Plan was insufficient shall include the following.
1. The appeal shall allege that recommended conditions requiring dedication or construction of
thoroughfares or traffic control improvements are not roughly proportional to the nature and extent of
the traffic impacts on the road network created by the development being proposed.
2. The appeal may also allege that the imposition of the conditions deprives the owner of the
economically viable use of the land or of a vested property right.
3. The applicant shall provide a study in support of the appeal including the following information:
a. Total vehicle miles of road capacity utilized by the proposed development, employing average
trip length and equivalency Tables provided by the City.
b. Total vehicle miles of road capacity supplied by proposed dedications of rights -of -way or
improvements to thoroughfares.
4. The City Council, shall consider the appeal and determine whether the street or traffic control
dedication and construction requirements are roughly proportional to the nature and extent of the
impacts on the road network created by the development proposed. If the petition also alleges that the
proposed dedication or construction requirements constitute a deprivation of economically viable use
or of a vested property right, the Hearing body also shall consider such issues. Following such
determinations, the appeal Hearing body may take any of the following actions regarding the road
adequacy portion of the appeal only:
a. Deny the appeal, upon determining that the required dedications of rights -of -way for or
improvements to thoroughfares or traffic control improvements are roughly proportional to the
nature and extent of the impacts created by the development, and order that such dedication or
improvements be made as a condition of approval of the subdivision application.
b. Deny the appeal, finding that the dedication or improvement requirements are inadequate to
achieve road adequacy, and either deny the subdivision application or require that additional
dedications of rights -of -way dedication for or improvements to thoroughfares or traffic control
improvements, be made as a condition of approval of the application.
C. Grant the appeal and waive in whole or in part any dedication or construction requirement that is
not roughly proportional; or
d. Grant the appeal and direct that the City participate in the costs of acquiring rights -of -way or
constructing improvements sufficient to achieve proportionality.
(Ord. No. 2017-15, § 2, 2-28-2017)
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 25 of 25
Created: 2023-03-27 12:05:57 [EST]