The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMIN 06.07.2021 CC-SNotice of a Meeting of the Governing Body of the City of Georgetown, Texas Tuesday, June 7, 2021 The Georgetown City Council met on Monday, June 7, 2021 at 11:30 a.m. at the Georgetown Public Library at 402 W. 8th Street. Mayor Schroeder called the meeting to order at 11:30 a.m. The following Council Members were in attendance: Mayor Josh Schroeder; Amanda Parr, Council Member District 1; Shawn Hood, Council Member District 2; Steve Fought, Council Member District 4; Kevin Pitts, Council Member District 5; and Tommy Gonzalez, Council Member District 7. Mike Triggs, Council Member District 3 and Rachael Jonrowe, Council Member District 6 were absent. Staff present were David Morgan, Laurie Brewer, Wayne Reed, Michaela Dollar, Kim McAuliffe, Cari Miller, Amanda Still, Wesley Wright, Mayra Cantu, Danella Elliott, Shirley Rinn and Karen Frost A. This is a special work/study session of the Georgetown City Council. This work/study session is related to Council Goals and Strategies for Downtown, including: 1. Background/history on planning and projects completed in the past, 2. Current projects related to city plazas and parks, parking and trash collection, and 3. Feedback from Council on the development of a future plan of work related to Downtown No official action was taken at this meeting. Any official adoption of items discussed at this workshop will be formally approved as an item on a later scheduled City Council Regular meeting. David Morgan welcomed everyone and explained the process of the work session. This is the first in a series of topics. He introduced Laurie Brewer who was the facilitator of the session. Brewer gave a short presentation on the past and present of the downtown area and asked for feedback on each of the topics. The presentation from Brewer is attached. The results follow. Past Present Future Future What are 3-5 words that describe What are 3-5 words that describe 'What are 3-5 words that describe your Threats for the future vision your first experience in our your experience today in our vision for downtown in 2025? (hurdles/things to address) downtown? downtown? Lifeless Quaint (2) Diverse density Accessible Diverse business Quiet Cafe on the Square mix (retail, food, Sidewalk density Diverse experience (shops, Closed early Suburban dining, drinks, Difficult accessing Expansion of Carts, trolley, etc. to Safe Historic (2) downtown growth move people to Limited options Inviting Allowing for growth Parking (3) Need multiple parking Vacancy Welcoming Compatible density options Incentives for Historic Vacancy Friendly (2) Thriving Preservation Crowded Full occupancy Panhandling Fun (2) Stewardship of historic Homelessness assets Crowded (but fun!) Continued restoration Trash receptacles Monitor business ix— retail Vibrant (3) Accessible to food/beverages Alive Pedestrian friendly (fully) Becoming 61h Street Sidewalk clutter Pedestrian Never ending protests Difficult to access Connectivity to parks, trails Unruly crowds Pedestrians Walkability Uncivil behavior Safe Garage parking Busy Residential Many options Family friendly 24/7 Safe Destination (3) Additional attraction Arts destination (more arts Restoration attractions) Historic asset Music Inviting Parking (WHAT?) Sidewalks (WHAT? Master Plan (WHAT?) Redesign of 1 block ea: 8', Main, 7tn 9-block square sidewalk exp. for Crosswalks clearer to become pedestrian expansion or people parking now without garage retail sides with longterm pedestrian only on these 3 blocks More parking OFF the square (3 mair Test: take a wheelchair and Pedestrian friendly square „ sides) Pedestrian Square operate on all sidewalks on the square (or bicycles) (parking off the square) The need is now Pavers settling Downtown sidewalks — bond sounds very interesting Crosswalks need improved Parking options short-term and long- Moving parking out of neighborhood term phased plan Need more parking overall Steps are too high Long term parking plan — phases Longterm multi -phase parking Need for parking now ADA Focus garage strategy Parking Garage NOW! Fix the approaches from parking to private investment — parking garage the sidewalks on the square Study PPP Garage Fix the sidewalks on the immediate PPP Garage square! 9th street lot: retail for sale 50' deep Garage on Southeast lot Expedite timeline downtown on 9th & Main — Develop parking on Rest Fixing most challenging with funds Possible change to traffic patterns Garage next to Monument available for max efficiency Valet Parking Need to continue sidewalk Parking improvements Free or paid (garage or not) Use citizen approved bonds for Future location of visitor center ADA and garage Paid parking options Pedestrian square Arts attractions Limited paid parking (evenings?) Widen around square —outdoor Compatible infill Current supply Sidewalks: not large enough Density & Height Current & future need They exist Is Courthouse corridor necessary? Study parking fees Great where redone Expansion of Business District (Transition Zones) Cost per space Drainage: H2O flow Alleyways developed (behind Roots, etc) City Initiated Master Plans • Downtown Master Plan (2003/2014) • Sidewalk Master Plan (2001/2014) and Public Facilities Access Audit (2014) • Downtown Parking Study (2015), Phase 3 Parking Analysis (2017) Summary of Implementation Actions to date related to (land use/density, parking, sidewalks, trash) Of the 41 tasks, 13 have been completed (31%), 14 in progress (33%) and 15 inactive (36%) Of the 5 associated with land use/density 0 are complete (0%) Of the 8 associated with sidewalks 6 are in progress (75%), 0 are complete (0%) Of the 26 associated with parking 11 are complete (42%) Of the 2 associated with trash 2 are complete (100%) 1. Downtown Master Plan (200312014) (Land use/intensity/partnerships) Provides overall vision for downtown development and includes new development, pedestrian circulation, streetscape design, wayfinding, parks/open space, circulation (cars) and parking. Implementation is organized into 5 parts. Remaining projects in the plan include priority 2 & 3 sidewalks, bike routes and additional racks, buried electric, parking structure, a pedestrian bridge across the San Gabriel River and trail connections. 1- NEW DEVELOPMENT IN OPPORTUNITY AREAS o 9 action items; 1 completed (11%); 7 in progress (78%); 1 inactive (11%) (Recommended Actions Priority Lead Support (Funding L3 Austin Avenue North f In progress Commerclaland mixed use development along Austin Avenue .A/B Prlvatedevel.per Economic Development 'DRZ,Prlvate In""'a"" Newdevdopn (residential/hoW/mixed Lt �Wfrwdngrlwer IB Prlvatedwelopw Economic Development "nR7, Prlvata tractive Redevelopment of historic Ja"-addition •B City/Private developer onomlc Development 'tax credits, Bonds, Grants, Private In ro ess Medium density rwldrldal devd. .tax hhorhopd WC Prllvte9wdooer Lr .mJt D-eIo tot L ,T credits, Private 1.2 Municipal Center In progress Ranowllon ofcdstingetruc w A city (aunt Bond, Tax oedits, Gtv rwl estata ete New Cl Hall tV ot, -rant Bond- City real estate 2.3 Southeast Ouadralt In progress f:ommrclal and mixed use development along Austin Avenue �B Private developer Ecpromlc Development 'n RZ,PrlvaMSID In proeasa [:omme4al and Mxed usadevdoprrrrtalong B4ln5treet B Prlvatedwdopr IZriondc Daveopment 'RR2. Private Cpmmrclal and mixed use devel mentalong University Ave B P—.1. dwdvper reenume 0-4, man[ 'n Private SID 2 - PEDESTRIAN/BIKE CIRCULATION & STREETSCAPE DESIGN o 15 action items; 2 completed (13%); 5 in progress (33%); 8 inactive (53%) rims nannN a-;mFETsr:A9F DEsir.N Recommended Actions IarlOritY (Lead Su ort (Funding Extend sidewalks throughout Downtown Overlay 2.1 District Inlx egreu 111➢r[u[ty vlay.der(rairis: Nla p-10) A riry CIP,SID Iisiglvr 7rd priority WU.da barer m V.R Mill lr iOty ❑P,SID Inactive 3nd Hon u advs Efirtw W M-p e10 I C ':I PP, SID 2.2 Intersection Improvements In progress Austin Ave. pedestria—weis(RRFB) A C.ty 4B, CIP InprNrms oordinate with sl dowel it ind street Improvements urVoing Dty 4B, Gp 23 improve bike routes (sharrows/sl n e) (inactive Me In 5ttpet enti nth suw(W Unlresfry) A 'City 4B, GP Inactive Roc: 5ue and xnd Suosrlwth connk:s W river tralls) B 'City 413, CIP Inactive B>/l end 7rd 5IIea4,{w/xen[a.'i to4w tralls) and loth to Ash St 1: 'Gt, 4B, GP In progress Irotafl El kp racln lhro[ghput d➢wMewn nngol ng 'Gty CIP,TIRZ,SID 2.4 improve river trall connections tothom Downtown In progress s to Ha/nmp W trait) A 'City io, CIP,TIRz Inactive Intuit wavBndinysiyn li 'Gty 'tB, CIP Inaetive CaAspvee plan oriel etewest(Water's Edge Apartments) D CJ Prp Ovmrs across rive, CIP 25 Install streetxa elements Complete Dlsvlcr A sty :Ip,TIRz,SID Complete lllutwk Do mlaw Olsufct it Gty iGP,nR7,51D Inactive UghOrq 1e 6nate withsldevvaik Improvements) nnyoi try CIN JP_nRZ SID 3 - AUTO CIRCULATION & PARKING o 17 action items; 2 completed (12%); 7 in progress (41%); 8 inactive (47%) =raa�c►r� t's�atr Recommended Actions Priority 1-ead Su Ort Fundins 3.1 IDmelop parkingmanagement elan Complete I nventory existing parking resources A city City In ro ress I:sblillsh eusda andtu:t arkl needs mana options ons A p CI by 3.2 IDeveI. detailed efurect d ns inactive Ausdn An u .A City pty In progress Bdi Strcetlnnvai Street .A City City Inactive Main Street lnorth ofsquare) ,A city vty Inactive 7th/eth Streets (fro m Church to Rock) B City Gty In progress Rock Street iB City aty Iruicuw, other Nd hborhood Streets c D ty C' 3.3 (Construct street Improvements In progress �Ausdn Avenue A/B city 4B, CIP, Grants In progress IBth Street Festival Street A/S I�ty • 13, CIP, Bond, Grants inactive IMaln Street (north of square) B City 411, Cl P, Grants In progress 7th/Bth Stree6(from Church to Rock) •C city 4S, CI P, Grants In progress IRDc Street C City •1 B, Cl P, Grants Inactive cyp atf. •1B_CIP Grants 3.4 ConStruct arkin lots,/structures Ibmplete 4th&MIK surface lot A 43ty County 4B, CIP Inactive ,Municipal Center parking structure B/C City County/Private Bond, CIP, Private Inactive 91h 9 Win llarkrng s9uetur0 C lary Private 1_JP PWI t, 4 - GATEWAYS, WAYFINDING & PUBLIC o 5 action items; 0 completed (0%) 3 in progress (60%) 2 inactive (40%) (RecommendedActions IPricrit 'Lead - Support Funding 4.1 Improve gateways In progress nactive N San 6a4n d Rlaer Mdr and Austin Awnzra Austin Avenueand lJniversi Avenue A )A 'Dty 'Cib ndjacentpropertvowners adjacent r owners lZ P, 51 D, Grants CJP. SID Grants 4.3 Re-im lement Wayfinding and Sf na a Plan In progress IN esf Minor re -design jimproved Identity) 1twouan an A A CI thy 'CI CIty Ll 4.3 Install updated signalte and Wayfind In Ina stivr Im tall sl a -going, •City 5 - PARKS, OPEN SPACE & PUBLIC ART o 7 action items; 0 completed (0%); 2 in progress (29%); 5 inactive (71%) le_aaouc APENeoar'LLLVURLICART Recommended Actions.. (Priority Lead Support Funding 5.1 Implement new arks and open ace Inactive 1terrace and/or park on the river ADO Private developer/parks Cl ty nRZ, Prlvatq Parks bond, ClP nacdve [VNghborhood park (North Aus[n Opportunity Areal ADO Parks dept 1=1ty iIRZ, Parks bond, CIP Inactive Dld Jail pa rk ADO Private developer/parks ❑ty nRZ, Private In progress [Municipal Center parks and plazas A Facilities City Bond Inactive Proposed pocket park and plan (at bank on Austin Ave) B/C Parks deist iDty/Private nRZ, SID, Parks bond Jnarpve Poc*m ar_V lzza at Unlversi Austin gateway A Parkstl L P CIP SID 5.2 Ipubllc Art In progress jVublic art(coordinatewith sidewalk/park improvements) onaalnk L'iryI 11RZ. SID. Arts Program, Private 2. Sidewalk Master Plan (2001/2014) and Public Facilities Access Audit (2014) The 2014 Sidewalk Master Plan updated the initial 2001 study, inventoried existing pedestrian infrastructure including ADA considerations for public facilities and Parks programming, identified design deficiencies, evaluated future sidewalk requirements and set forth an implementation plan for all pedestrian facilities within the City of Georgetown city limits. $2.1 million budgeted for Downtown Priority 1 sidewalks, $1.3 million is encumbered Infrastructure Total Quantity Non -Compliant Addressed %Complete Sidewalk 38,858If 5,696If 3,947If 69% Curb Ramps 268 each 174 each 105 each 60% Pedestrian Crosswalks 174 each 17 each 8 each 47% Protruding Objects N/A 174 each Pedestrian Push Buttons 48 each 8 each Doors N/A 55 each Ramps 7 each 7 each Driveways N/A 67 ach 3. Downtown Parking Study (2015). Phase 3-Parking Analysis (20171 The 2015 parking study provided an analysis of the supply and utilization of parking in the Downtown. o 23 action items; 10 completed (43%); 3 in progress (14%) 10 inactive (43%) a. Progress made to date: L Parking Ambassador ii. New parking lots along W. 8th Street iii. 15-minute parking zones have been added in ROW parking areas Increase pedestrian friendly Master Sidewalk policy: sandwich boards? Plan Ped flow? Retail products? County Employee Parking Where? More handicap parking Business employee's parking area — Move off square Where? How are we addressing bikes on sidewalks? Sidewalks are important throughout city Hotel boutique Hotels Gateways — inviting into downtown area Residential rental & purchase • WHAT are the most important issues that need to be addressed as the Downtown Master Plan is updated? • WHAT kind of private investment would Council like to see happening in the Downtown? • WHAT public investment/infrastructure does the city need to address? • WHO are the key stakeholders that need to be engaged? t Parking (WHO?) Government partners Tax (WILCO) Assessor Sidewalks (WHO?) Business owners, citizens Citizens Master Plan (WHO) Business & property owners County staff Purposeful parking increases Those with mobility issues PPP County employees Elderly & handicapped Wilco Tax (Wilco) Assessor Same as parking Citizens Close neighborhood residents Business & property owners Other cities with similar downtowns Continual opposers Businesses All stakeholders — all citizens All residents Building owners/Business owners Everyone Old Town residents: re: sidewalks Owners County employee parking count -# o employees Business & property owners Downtown businesses Business/restaurants Downtown re: parking needs Tenants Past • Safe - How do we know it's safe? What made you feel safe so we can keep doing it? • Downtown - What are we doing to incentivize downtown redevelopment? • We are not currently doing any federal programs, just the fagade grant program. • Fought - Sidewalks are where we need to improve and would be our best investment Present Crowded o Good and bad • Historic assets are maintained, along with infrastructure • Parking is hard • Danger to pedestrians • Our downtown is busy which is good for businesses • Energy makes it inviting so more people come • Concern about what is too crowded and what makes it "uninviting" o Our asset remains the same, but our use has increased Future • Threats o Unruly behavior o Homeless o Trash o Parking o Accessibility o Incentives for downtown • Themes o Diversify business mix/experience o Accessible and pedestrian friendly o Use the matches downtown o Music/art o Garage parking o Stewardship of historic assets o Occupancy Discussion around the need for another parking study. The next parking study will need to have focus around certain areas the Council wants explored to garner the greatest benefit from the study. Parking o When we do public engagement lets have it like we did for the public spaces event and host it at the potential sites o Suggestion of study to determine supply and demand o Suggestion of cost recovery system for parking spaces during busiest hours o Consider pedestrian friendly square, three sides no parking, only pedestrian area o Look at Master Plan o Consider parking garage with public input, but do it quickly, more parking needed on east side of square asap Sidewalks o Look at ADA study again to see pressure points o Continue improvements but expedite o Limit sidewalk "accessories" in fronts of businesses o Level sidewalks and make one accessible ramp per block, Master Plan o Re-examine parking and gateways o Look at other cities for examples o Need to consider expediting items to keep up with growth o Alley development needs to be reviewed o Also consider county employees and visitors when reviewing development and parking Future sessions — request that these sessions are not the same week as council and Tuesdays are preferred around the lunch time David Morgan thanked everyone for coming. The next session will be held in September. Adjournment Mayor Schroeder adjourned the meeting at 1:30 p.m. Appr ved b the Georgetown City Council on I cUx Q Z 21 W Z4 Date Josh chroede ayor Attest: City Secretary Master Plan Implementation Summary: ■ Downtown Master Plan (2003/2014) • Sidewalk Master Plan (2001/2014) and Public Facilities Access Audit (2014) • Downtown Parking Study (2015), Phase 3 Parking Analysis (2017) ■ Of the 41 implementation actions related to land use/density, parking, and sidewalks, to date 13 have been completed (31%), 14 in progress (33%) and 15 are inactive (36%). 1. Downtown Master Plan (2003/20141 (Land uselintensity/partnerships) Provides overall vision for downtown development. Implementation is organized into 5 parts. Remaining projects in the plan include priority 2 & 3 sidewalks, bike routes and additional racks, buried electric, a parking structure, a pedestrian bridge across the San Gabriel River and trail connections. Of the 5 implementation actions associated with land use/density 0 are complete (0%). 1- New development in opportunity areas o 9 action items; 1 completed (11%); 7 in progress (78%); 1 inactive (11%) 2 - Pedestrian/bike circulation & streetscape design o 15 action items; 2 completed (13%); 5 in progress (33%); 8 inactive (53%) 3 - Auto circulation & parking o 17 action items; 2 completed (12%); 7 in progress (41%); 8 inactive (47%) 4 - Gateways, wayfinding & public o 5 action items; 0 completed (0%) 3 in progress (60%) 2 inactive (40%) 5 - Parks, open space & public art o 7 action items; 0 completed (0%); 2 in progress (29%); 5 inactive (71%) 2. Sidewalk Master Plan (2001/2014) and Public Facilities Access Audit (2014) The 2014 Sidewalk Master Plan updated the initial 2001 study, inventoried existing pedestrian infrastructure including ADA considerations for public facilities and Parks programming, identified design deficiencies, evaluated future sidewalk requirements and set forth an implementation plan for all pedestrian facilities within the Georgetown city limits. Of the $2.1 million budgeted for Downtown Priority 1 sidewalks, $1.3 million is encumbered. Of the 8 implementation actions associated with sidewalks 6 are in progress (75%), 0 are complete (0%). Infrastructure Total Quantity Non -Compliant Addressed % Complete Sidewalk 38,858If 5,696If 3,947If 69% Curb Ramps 268 each 174 each 105 each 60% Pedestrian Crosswalks 174 each 17 each 8 each 47% Protruding Objects N/A 174 each Pedestrian Push Buttons 48 each 8 each Doors N/A 55 each Ramps 7 each 7 each Driveways N/A 67 each 3. Downtown Parking Study (2015), Phase 3 Parking Anal ssis (2017 The 2015 parking study provided an analysis of the supply and utilization of parking in the Downtown. Of the 23 action items, 10 are completed (43%), 3 in progress (14%), and 10 inactive (43%). Progress made to date includes a Parking Ambassador, new parking lots along W. 8th Street, and 15-minute parking zones added in ROW parking areas. y, l � I. � - it � t!'. u� ,� ' R . �: . '; ��,� ;� � � z l ., .�' '' ^ F �, � ' ;� . �'��1 � _� � :�� .�.,� I''j� ;� f , � : yri �' ,' � ��s � � tf 1 � i � , ' ,+ y, 1, ��. J.. r {g., j ''if. r �N��q� + fi 1�.. �� g� JJJJJJ . � li � � �� . �' .• %y -' _ �} {Y i ( �. 1 a `� i � ,�. r � , � �F — � _Lr . - f� � � �' H r f � � � i�• � , it , r Y r .i l �i��i ). � 1 :�� t' a� E (D E •� C C O (j O O C O O i C � Lj c 0N C) . ate-•' N a a = ca o � o 'Ca N 'C i s= .� Cc m = `O O 0 a >. a� 0 ca •� 5 70 0 .. � CY p 06c� ca O CL ' o a c a Sao 4 O I cc a- Hi FY FY 4 O M M t� G� O N cc H 0 CQ a] CL Q3 G3 � [c D CD tom] ca m s.. 0 CD4-1 �C.7 C i cc a CL U. • • r o cz ■� Cc v K] i CD O 4-0 a-+ Ca � CD Ca t i CC CO = — a 0 +O-+ O O _ O G� CD O � N � _O O v •� > CCi _> CD O Cl) O CD O O � O ate-+ CC N p > CD 4-0 a�..r O 00 CC CCcn +� C .O ♦"� W y i Ca CC + .+ N O Q O 'N +' C W C N cacc ca ca 'v W V O y � O cc 0.tJD (D ai+ CD y i O y � �CC Y + V Q U CD O OCD� _ i�l I Ilk - ate.... '4A ki r =y V C) i cc i CD O i cc N O ._ (a Ca Cr � 4-j C ) � H E W a Cc ca Cc� a CD � M m CD CD i .C� C i cts i Ca cn 4-j O = � O � O O L �E G.i ♦.., > O O O i cn 'ca co Cm M C* CD Co cc$ 0 E 75 ca 0 O C4 Jill All All FZ c CL � O O N c O cc N cn O � O > L � .y cc W � � E cc CJ Ca O x i m = O .0 ) > m +.' .0 M W cc CL a� 0 L.L � O C3 � a v a v v v a a a a v a [V N N N N N 0 U) CN I =oun E � -0 c O O .- M_ �aES CO � -0 Y No w Cc� W _ O +j (L) O LL - :2 - _ Cn OMgt a = can � v �o c � � O CD CO N N 0 9 Z x� KO� d� i O O a... a 4-0 P J � O ca CD O ca BE 00 O O C M 4--j �A p p O E 10�p Z m Z cc CD ca N CL E cc 1 CD G p C..� Cc c.� -0 _ c cc �Gi cc i �c 0 E CD'i 4-0 � N C N CDtaA J � = U C m O i y .0 � cc; Ci j W C.� C� .�''' CD � a 0 N 0 Cc N Lo u7 co Qb ti co co 0o aD im Rr-# T -i N N N CD CD N N N N N N N 0 00 N CM � Q0 O C O O CM tq O M r-i N Y ti N N ti M N ia O 00 co N N N w} N ti N Ef} am CD N N 00 to LO rn ti LO ti ti ti 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 C LO o LO o LO o LO co M N N -4 -q rig y i a :!� 1• � r W �I - 1 L 'I i 1 . � I � ,r y +r N O +.+ O cn 0- CD 4-+ C) 0 O > BE CD N 0) CM w O Mw N/ Mw W L + CD w w CD w CD LO N 6c). 40 03 t c Y v c 07 E C c� Oft cc o CO .� r1 �T CD � O c N z 3 = o a� W O = m _ i O _O •O C v Q O Ccm cn v +, c O O, O (n O O J O O O � M Cc CC 2 cz C) C:) CD CN CD Cli O C) ilia ill,. A� W 000o\ N O O 1 = O O = Q _ CD Ca E %0 .Cc O O O a..+ Ca ay+ O O % •� E cc O +i E 0 O GD IL 0 CC O O O cc m cc V V V is c c 0 N � O O L o E 4-1 ate ` O N O w 0 C� .3 cn +r O o p CD v O p r-I tQ 00o Ey L 04 O �m i i O N cn m C E (D 2 CC.� C15 00 CD 0 CCL C� O E N� =43 cLo N Q CD •0 in cn cc cn-- cn N o u �..± e i • s • z `i 1 CD Q 0 Q 0] Q U 0� Q Lc E Mo cc w U R5 t W r- :0 ti a atea N cc O W _O E U a=+ F. ate-+ O O O E O O E n y O cc L O N O E Y O .y CD a-+ G� O W (n O i O CL Q. O O G� O "O M _cc i CD cc E O O G� t a-+ G� cc [Milo] O O ui V cc CD CD c cc CD G) 0 E cc CD v C 0 a cc cc 4-0 _0 E 0 U CD E o. 0 .a a� CD O O i N O . A i cc i J E O cn N O C.� a a� cn 00 C O cn _ Q V Q a� O °- 4-J CL cc o _ c a 3 5r O N i c Q) O •— Nch O Cc ca a .� Ch � G.� .41 O 114— L � 00 w to 0 G— w = O a- — O N cc O Cc � O CD N _ a z 33 xo� w a o w s U E 0 U e 00 aO N v N E 0 ^ l.L L U X W O N O E `= 'p O 'y Z O o v N 1p v � O = v LOL O CD v OCN O CIO 'O w O cn a- a- a ca �.. - a o -a o � � occ .� CD CIO Q CD C o Q u�o CD a a) � � o a� C cn cc CD CD U � Y � w Y L t!) N G� V C� cc W 5 O Vi W O O = _ CL O O = _ Ca /1 w O N E v >O O Cc E .r- L N rl � • Tq _ cc _ _ cc N cc Y cc CD .N 4-0 cc CE W • z x3 o 0 w C7 i O m 0 0 N ti y A ' UM UM qm W L V cc ♦ -0 y cc G) ■ E O ice, V •cr G,� Ca to •�i_+ V = O a ■ •� Cc Cy N a� cc O _ � W Cc cc G� • i G� O (D ��--• Cc C CD c - Q A O w 4-1 V cc O O E 0 O E Q a O CD Cu a E c� cc O t= O O �= N .O Ca w CD i Q) 'i O w .y CD N L O cc CL i N r-I • O O E3 i ■ r9 W �J L_J t : �RW�.��. �F Z O x3 O v = aN+ x , as u, w F- Nate••+ O p0CL C '� i � � •UTA > O � cc > a=+ Occ N = O O S ?+ +_+ �+ ate•+ CO.� N O � i •N .0 � '~ O 015 O .? cc 0 i i (DW O O O ,N i O CD.O E Y E a••, p +-+ .> O C cc i A O (D (D i O a..� p U...=a� (D E C = 0,0 E 'er ccGi 0 a". _ = N -W O a) O V G i > cc c UA as C O i (D �= O •3 O cQ y C G� (D N i 0 cc v C) O. 0 O � E cc v O 0 E O m N �• N un ccN p.� y ate-•+ p (D -W Y O u y R 0 R _R 0 — a••i R 0 O •� i c6 O O O 4-0 O C p O G� •cj O y R +� � �� R O aN•+ • C •� ,� C ; •� i E 100 C (D N OO y 0 O cc O cc N N� 'O + M = O cc N N = c ca O _ cts .Q ca 3-0w 3 p+3 30 o CD o O +. a✓ D O O. no .� C ME 0 � +�•+ 'C G a is G c�.� V i i 75 cQ •� Z N �QA Q OC a Q . i:i I- O iE O O O ♦, � 000 cc C V r Q�0 I O •� c C.)�. Co -0 c6 � iU U E OE •00 ,°� 00 G3 O ,r.. Q - O O .(4 0 EZ E 04) li � ■ I no y0� O w 1Y ...997 f r k VA r ' 2 w _ 1 p � xN►r rp�u ea,sr�r� :nti;•�r.xxsa+�xe: - - . fir+ I 14 11 CJ'1 n % r❑, i St v N 'q) SR O O i O U Y ca a CV Co .4 LO N a=+ C.� C C .CIO 4-0 cc i O R CU CD cc C� Cn Ca O C ccN = O N N C. Cc }' v cc C � cc biA M caN V i C .o cV .cc ' O C Y CV ,c a m m a C- CU Ea❑❑❑❑ CY 0- N Octs � Q � � m O cc � O cc �cc E o N � 4-0 O • O d 0 s • O cU ■ ti C.� co CD c cc O i ate-+ N 0