HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 05.28.2020 CC-WNotice of Meeting of the
Governing Body of the
City of Georgetown, Texas
Tuesday, May 28, 2020
The Georgetown City Council will meet on Tuesday, May 28, 2020 at 3:00 PM at the Council Chambers, at
510 West 91" Street, Georgetown, TX 78626.
The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If
you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA,
reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the
City Secretary's Office, at least three (3) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City
Hall at 808 Martin Luther King Jr. Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas
at 711.
Mayor Ross called the meeting to order at 3:17 p.m. The following Council Members were in attendance:
Mayor Dale Ross; Mary Calixtro, Council Member District 1; Valerie Nicholson, Council Member District
2; Mike Triggs, Council Member District 3; Steve Fought, Council Member District 4; Kevin Pitts, Council
Member District 5; and Rachael Jonrowe, Council Member District 6. Tommy Gonzalez, Council Member
District 7 was absent. All present Council Members attended via videoconferencing and a roll call was
performed.
Policy Development/Review Workshop - Call to order at 3:00 PM
A. Presentation and discussion regarding Water and Electric Budgets -- Leigh Wallace, Finance
Director
Wallace presented the item and provided a revenue and expense outlook with the note that
the pandemic is a dynamic situation and estimates and action plans may change as the
cihmtinn evolves. She provided the Electric Fund 5urmmary as follows:
Beginning Fund Balance
FY2020
Orignal
Budget
FY2020
Amendment
Changes
FY2020
Amended
Budget
FY2020
Projection
6,614,742
5,892,640
722,102
6,614,742
Sum of Revenues
95,418,419
750,000
96,168,419
96,020,348
Sum of Expenses
92,565,824
918,304
93,484,128
92,565,248
Ending Fund Balance
8,745,235
553,798
9,299,033
10,069,842
CAFR Adjustment
-
-
90 Day Operational Contin
4,190,235
-
4,190,235
4,190,235
Rate Stabilization
4,555,000
-
4,555,000
4,555,000
Available Fund Balance
-
553,798
553,798
1,324,607
Wallace noted that overall fund is projected in a good position and the purchase power
market will be the big factor to staying on course. She reviewed electric consumption trends
noting that overall kWh consumed decreased in March and April 2020 compared to same
period 2019. Wallace noted that commercial/industrial/builder usage is down,
schools/City/county government usage is down, residential usage is up, weather patterns
have been mild overall, and even with hotter temperatures, staff assumes these consumption
trends will continue as long as work and school patterns are disrupted. Wallace reviewed
billing and receivables noting that consumption patterns translate to less billed revenue
compared to the same March -April period last year, sales revenue projections through end of
fiscal year are $1.5 million below budget, and accounts receivable aging (past due bills)
patterns emerging are showing $88,000 increase to receivables more than 30 days past due.
She explained the utility billing assistance for customers noting that up to $1 million total
assistance available across Water and Electric funds with administration procedures covered
during May 12th council workshop. Wallace continued that the assistance covered 50% by
re -purposed Conservation Fund and 50% by unplanned development contribution in Water
Fund and there was no impact to budgeted revenue. She then reviewed the development fee
revenue noting that Electric had a 2020 Budget of $600,000 and a 2020 projection of $2,000,000,
due to strong development continuing and seeing results of charging fees up front. Wallace
then gave a revenue summary that noted: decreased sales of $1,500,000; decreased
miscellaneous revenue of $50,000; increased development fees of $1,400,000; increased bond
proceeds of $1,000,000; decreased Bloomberg grant of $250,000; total change in
Original/Projected of $600,000; and total change amended of $750,000. She explained the
operational cost projections noting that the Purchased Power total net budget $59.5 million
with the year to date (October - April) trend being 4% over budget due to unforeseen
decreases in demand due to COVID impact ability to sell excess energy and that staff expects
the trend to slowly improve as economy re -opens. Wallace continued that this Summer is
expected to be hot, with overall state demand expected to increase despite COVID, the fund
is projecting at budget at this time and staff will continue portfolio management activities.
She stated that Legal expenses have seen an $150,000 increase, staff will move a Utilities
Analyst position from Finance to Electric for a $118,000 increase, staff will move a Records
Analyst from Electric to Water for a $63,000 decrease, there is a decrease due to the Bloomberg
grant program of $250,000 and a decrease return on investment transfer to the General Fund
of $225,000. Wallace then explained the operational cost reductions that have been executed
to date which are: vacancy savings of $200,000 for 6 positions; travel and training cut that is
not required for licenses leading to a $8,000 savings; Transmission and Distribution
maintenance savings of $38,000 due to a transition of utility relocates for road projects to be
paid by road bonds; and other various savings from prior vacancies, miscellaneous programs
and equipment totaling $597,000. She then noted the capital projects for Electric with original
projects moving forward that total $4 million, $1 million added to debt for transformers with
a corresponding increase in bond proceed revenue, new total 2020 projects are $5 million, and
rolling forward prior year encumbrances due to financial software implementation of
$113,000. Wallace reviewed the expense summary that includes: increased capital
improvement projects (CIP) of $1,000,000; prior year encumbrance of $113,000; Utilities
Analyst position of $118,000; Records Analyst position of $63,000; Bloomberg grant project of
$250,000; Legal Expenses of $150,000; Training/Vacation/Maintenance/Other of $843,000;
decrease return on investment to General Fund of $225,000; total change to
Original/Projections of $0; and total change amended of $918,000. She then provided an
Electric Fund conclusion which noted: COVID-19 is affecting consumption patterns in short-
term and some long-term impact is anticipated; hot summer should favor purchased power;
increases and decreases in operational expenses; increases in debt -funded capital expenses;
and the Fund in a stable position for now with staff watching COVID-19 affects on purchase
nmmar mar1cpf Wnllnra nrnuidprl the fnllnwina Water Fund Summarv:
FY2020 FY2020
FY2020 Amendment Amended
Budget Changes Budget
FY2020
Projection
Beginning Fund Balance
82,511,169
11,954,021
94,465,190
94,465,190
Sum of Revenues
81,834,114
2,500,000
84,334,114
87,583,226
Sum of Expenses
139,654,887
9,348,288
149,003,175
148,030,266
Ending Fund Balance
24,690,396
5,105,733
29,796,129
34,018,150
CAFR Adjustment
-
-
90 Day Oper. Contingency
8,236,379
-
8,236,379
8,236,379
Non Oper. Contingency
10,000,000
-
10,000,000
10,000,000
Available Fund Balance
6,454,017
5,105,733
11,559,750
15,781,771
She noted that there has been an overall positive impact to both revenue and expense and a
mid -year budget amendment is needed for several items not known at budget adoption.
Wallace reviewed the Water Production Trends which are an overall decrease trend in treated
water for the period of March and April 2020 compared to same period 2019 which is
primarily due to weather patterns cooler/wetter, and staff is not forecasting significant change
in consumption due to COVID-19. She explained the billing and receivables have
consumption patterns that translate to less billed revenue compared to the same March -Apr
period last year, revenue projections for the remainder of fiscal year are that a hot summer
will keep revenue on budget, and accounts receivable aging (past due bills) patterns emerging
show a $35,000 increase to receivables more than 30 days past due. Wallace then explained
Development Fee revenue for Water noting that the 2020 Budget was $14.2 million with the
2020 projection being $26 million due to strong development continues inside and outside
city limits and several large one-time development payments. She reviewed the revenue
summary which is: increased development of $11,800,000; decreased bond proceeds of
$9,300,000; other fee revenue of interest earnings, inspection fees, tap fees, connect fees, etc.
totaling $3,250,000; total change to Original/Projections of $5,750,000; and a total change
amended of $2,500,000. Wallace explained the operational cost reductions that have been
executed by staff which include position vacancy savings of $105,000 for four positions and
travel and training not required for licenses of $19,000 for savings. She explained the
operation cost projections which includes: utilities at City facilities, mid -year budget
amendment necessary to cover projected costs in Water Fund of $1.4 million; resource costs
(raw and treated water) with $1.5 million increase in water contracts approved by Council to
meet demand; moving Records Analyst from Electric to Water for a $63,000 increase; adding
on Locator position for $66,000; sludge disposal increases of $130,000; and miscellaneous
savings from prior vacancies, equipment, and contracts totaling $850,000. Wallace reviewed
capital projects for Water which are: original total debt funded projects of $18.6 million;
projects on hold by staff of $3.8 million; projects on hold for debt market of $5.5 million with
corresponding decrease in bond proceed revenue; Parkside Development Agreement water
line of $3.5 million; new total 2020 projects of $12.8 million; and rolling forward prior year
encumbrances due to financial software implementation of $12 million. She provided the
expense summary as follows: decrease deferred CIP of $9,300,000; Parkside line of $3,500,000;
prior year end CIP of $12,000,000; water resource contracts of $1,500,000; municipal pumping
of $1,400,000; Records Analyst of $63,000; Line Locator of $66,000; sludge disposal of $130,000;
training/vacation saving/other miscellaneous of $974,000; total change to original/projections
of $8,385,000; and total change to amended of $9,359,000. Wallace provided the Water Fund
conclusion which states that it is in overall healthy fund status with increased operating
revenues and expenses, there is a decrease in capital revenue and expenses for deferred
projects, and staff sees no anticipated change in consumption patterns due to COVID and hot
summer which will equal a continued healthy fund.
Mayor Ross asked for Council to provides comments or questions on the Electric Fund.
Nicholson had no comments or questions.
Triggs asked about the 30-day receivable increase and how many accounts it included.
Wallace responded that she wasn't sure. Triggs asked if it was an increase of $88,000 or an
increase to $88,000. Wallace responded that $88,000 is the amount of the increase.
Fought had no questions or comments.
Pitts asked if there has been a change in reporting methodology for collecting development
fees. Wallace responded yes, for Electric. Pitts asked if the revenue recognition was on a cash
basis. David Morgan, City Manager, responded yes. General discussion of the City's new
process for billing and collecting up front for a project instead of at project completion. Pitts
asked about the $150,000 increase in legal expenses. Wallace responded that the original legal
expenses budget was $600,000, so the new total would be $750,000. Pitts asked if this increase
was due to a current lawsuit. Daniel Bethapudi, General Manager of Electric Utilities
responded that the funds were a combination of legal fees related to lawsuit and risk
management fees. Pitts asked about the reduction in the return on investment transfer and
how much it had been reduced from the original budget. Wallace responded that the current
reduction is the only one for FY2020.
Jonrowe had no questions or comments on Electric or Water funds
Pitts asked if staff is using the same methodology for Water as for Electric. Morgan responded
that water was different due to the utilization of impact fees. He added that it was a different
process all together and it was hard to compare the two.
Fought had no questions or comments for Water.
Triggs had no questions or comments for Water.
Nicholson had no questions or comments for Water.
Calixtro had no questions or comments for Water or Electric funds.
Wallace provided the next steps which are to collect a Council feedback summary, continue
the review of revenue and expenses trends, and at the June 9th Council Meeting provide a
mid -year budget amendment for a first reading.
B. Presentation and discussion regarding the annual review and list of General Amendments to
the Unified Development Code (UDC) for 2020 -- Sofia Nelson, Planning Director
Nelson presented the item and reviewed the UDC Annual Review Process. She explained the
UDC Direction on Amendments which states that the UDC identifies that the review shall
occur on an annual basis, and amendments shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
and may be made in support of one of the following circumstances: to establish and maintain
sound, stable, and desirable development within the jurisdiction of the City; or to correct
errors in the text; or to address changed or changing conditions in the City. Nelson stated
that topics are introduced by City staff and the public in addition to a City Council
presentation and discussion on initial list of amendments, but given the COVID-19 pandemic
the UDC Advisory Committee has not been meeting and have not been included in the review
of the annual list of amendments. She added that should the Council want to include them
the proposed process can be amended. Nelson noted that the Planning and Zoning
Commission (P&Z) provides recommendation on UDC list of amendments, the City Council
reviews and approves list of topics to be amended and the Unified Development Code
Advisory Commission (UDCAC) and City Staff begin to prepare draft amendments. She
explained the review of recent amendments including amendments to address changed or
changing conditions in the City such as the Certificate of Appropriateness Process, Land Use
Notification Requirements, sign variance opportunities, the number of units per building in
the Multi -Family zoning districts, multi -family detached use in the Mixed -Use Downtown
(MU-DT) zoning district, and minimum district size requirements for the Business Park (BP)
zoning district. Nelson then reviewed the amendments to maintain sound, stable, and
desirable development which include: building height permitted in the General Commercial
(C-3) zoning district; specific site design standards for fuel sales use; parkland dedication
requirements; request for Special Purpose Districts (i.e. Municipal Utility Districts (MUDs));
setback/screening requirements when adjacent to residential property in the extraterritorial
jurisdiction (ETJ); auto -related uses in the Local Commercial (C-1) zoning district; food and
beverage establishments in the Industrial (IN) zoning district; and mobile or outdoor food
vendor uses. She then explained the staff recommendations for amendments in 2020 which
are: Sign Ordinance to address legal compliance of ordinance and use of electronic signs; tree
preservation/landscape conflicts to improve the readability and usability of ordinances;
Group Homes to address legal compliance of ordinance; and conflicts with Fire Code relating
to street cross -sections for parking on both sides. Nelson stated that there has been public
request for reviewing the use of artificial turf in lieu of grass in single-family developments.
She stated that the next steps for the process are: P&Z provides recommendation on UDC list
of amendments on June 161h; City Council reviews and approves list of topics to be amended
on July 141"; UDCAC and City Staff begin to prepare draft amendments in August of 2020.
Nelson noted that staff would like direction to staff on the topics, priorities, and process.
Nicholson has no comments or questions.
Triggs noted that he has constituents interested in artificial turf. He had no questions.
Fought noted that he also has constituents interested in artificial turf, but it is not something
that needs to be rushed. He had no questions.
Pitts stated that he agreed with Fought.
Jonrowe stated that she had no issue with the suggestions and staff should add the UDCAC
to the process. She added that she does have concerns with the permeability of turf but is
willing to discuss it further.
Calixtro stated that she is wanting more information about the UDC and related process. She
added that she has not had anyone approach her about turf.
Mayor Ross stated that he agrees with Jonrowe about the review committee and wants public
comment. He asked how adding the UDC advisory committee would work. Nelson
responded that staff would call a special meeting for giving input on the list of
recommendations. She added that if Council wanted to proceed with the proposed timeline,
the UDCAD would not be involved with making the list of recommendations but would be
involved in vetting of the language. Mayor Ross asked if Council goes with the proposed
timeline, when does public comment. Nelson responded that the public can comment on the
list itself can be commented on via the P&Z and Council meetings. She added that the public
would be also be able to attend UDC and P&Z meetings. Mayor Ross asked if it would give
the public plenty of time to comment. Nelson responded yes at P&Z, Council, and summer
through fall for comments.
No Council Members disagreed.
C. Presentation and discussion regarding COVID-19 and the City's disaster declaration,
emergency management response, opening of city facilities, and modified operations and
programs -- David Morgan, City Manager
Morgan presented the item and noted that City facilities have been reopening. He noted that
on May 181h the following facilities opened to public: City Hall, Georgetown Municipal
Complex, Visitors Center, Airport Terminal, Public Safety Operations, and Garey Park Gate
House. Morgan stated that the following City facilities opened on May 18"', but by
appointment only: Parks and Recreation Administration Office, Animal Shelter with limited
occupancy, Historic Light and Water Works building, and the Council and Court Building
which houses Accounting and IT. He stated that the Municipal Court will reopen on June 1st
consistent with the Texas Supreme Court direction and Advisory Boards will begin meeting
June 1st with the following precautions: hosting meetings in the Friends Room of the Library
or Council Chambers; meetings will be in person with option for advisory board members to
participate through conference call; public is welcome to attend meetings; and meeting rooms
set-up will provide social distancing between board seats and audience.
Kimberly Garrett, Parks and Recreation Director, presented to speak about Parks and
Recreation facilities. She noted that following facilities are open now: Bark Park, Blue Hole
Park, drinking fountains, Garey Park, pickleball courts at McMaster Park, picnic shelters with
1 table, sestrooms, Skate Park, Tennis Center, Tennis Courts at McMaster Park, and trails.
Garret stated that the following facilities will open on June 1st: Athletic Field Practices for
youth, basketball courts, Community Center, exercise stations, Garey House, picnic pavilions
with two or more tables, playgrounds, Recreation Center, and volleyball courts. She stated
that the following facilities will open on June 151": athletic field games for youth, outdoor
pools with community outdoor pools open at 25% capacity including Recreation Center
outdoor pool, Williams Drive Pool, and Village Pool, and other pools will not open at this
time due to limited trained lifeguards. Garrett stated that the opening of destination facilities
is to be determined due to the difficulty of practicing social distancing which includes the
Creative Playscape, Garey Park Play Ranch, and splash pads. She reviewed Parks and
Recreation programming and noted that staff is able to offer select summer programming at
a reduced capacity or a delayed start as follows:
PROGRAM
Adaptive Camp-
GISD Campus
BEGINS
BEGINS
BEGINS
!�
CANCELED
Adventure Camp
Athletic Leagues -Adult
Athletic Leagues -Youth}
Camp Goodwater
(50 kids/week)
Fitness Programs
E
Kid City-GISD Campus
r�
Movies in the Park June
Movies in the Park -
July and August
Private/Small Group
Tennis Lessons
Recreation Programs
Kd`
Swim Lessons
Tennis Camps
Morgan noted special events that are coming up including the 4th of July as a drive-in
celebration, POPPtoberfest October 23-25, music on the Square to begin in July, and all other
special events in Georgetown facilitated by other organizations must follow the Governor's
guidance on social distancing. He reviewed fee waivers and noted that on April 141h the
Council approved the waiver of fees through May 31s, for: temporary sign application fees;
security systems false alarm fees; Go Geo fares and paratransit fees; and utility billing (water,
electric, sanitation, stormwater, wastewater) late fees. Morgan noted that all fees will be
reinstated beginning June 1st. He reviewed COVID-19 testing and noted that Georgetown
Fire Department has supported testing site at Wagner Middle School since launch and the site
is planned to remain open through June. Morgan continued that the site is completing 35-45
tests per day with a 7% positive rate. He stated that on May 11th the Governor directed 100%
of staff and residents in nursing homes be tested and those facilities are licensed under Health
and Human Services who has empowered fire departments to assist with testing. Morgan
added that there are three skilled nursing facilities in Georgetown with 29 other long-term
care facilities including assisted living, hospice, and home health. He reviewed the Disaster
Declaration and noted that on April 281h the Council approved the extension and continuation
of the City of Georgetown Disaster Declaration until such time as it is terminated by
subsequent City Council action or the statewide disaster declaration issued by the Governor
is terminated, and on May 191h the Williamson County Commissioners Court ended the
County disaster declaration. Morgan noted the pros of the Disaster Declaration continuation
which are: it provides the authority of the Governor of the State of Texas to the Mayor, should
we need to implement special rules or adjust operations; it increases liability protection for
the city government and any volunteers or others acting on our behalf in response to the
disaster; it allows for formal assistance request from the state and/or federal government; and
it is tied to justification for emergency funds and grant applications. He reviewed the cons of
the Declaration continuation which are: it is not consistent with the County; there is an
unknown end date; and operations are normalizing in the "new normal." Morgan stated that
staff's recommendation is to continue the declaration and reference the Governor's Orders.
Jonrowe stated that she appreciates staff reviewing changing rules and regulations for parks
and recreation. She then asked when the employee daycare will be shutting down. Garrett
responded that the daycare will go through end of the week (May 291") and all employees
were notified. Jonrowe asked if staff was able to find adequate resources. Garrett responded
yes, as far as she knows. Jonrowe asked if there was signage posted at facilities relating to
requirements. Garrett responded yes, there is currently signage at Blue Hold Park. Jonrowe
asked if utility fees will restart June 1s'. Morgan responded yes, that is the current schedule.
Jonrowe stated that she is a little concerned until all places can go back to 100% capacity and
asked if there was consideration for extending the fee waivers. Morgan responded that staff
is happy to extend further. He added that from a business standpoint, staff understands that
not all businesses can open, and it is an approximately $152,000 per month impact of waiving
fees. Jonrowe asked if the $152,00 is just fees. Morgan responded that is correct and a majority
of that will be waiving late payments for utility billing. Jonrowe asked related to utility late
fees, how much of those fees are related to people seeing financial troubles. Morgan
responded that he is not aware if staff has that information and he's not sure accounts are
tracked that way. Jonrowe stated that she is in favor of postponing utility late fees a little
longer to give people more help. She asked if the 7% positive rate for COVID-19 testing was
for test at Wagner only. Morgan responded, yes for test at Wagner only. Jonrowe asked if
that site was used by Georgetown residents only. Morgan responded that not only
Georgetown residents have used the site. Jonrowe asked if it was just diagnostic testing, not
antibody testing. Morgan responded that was correct. Jonrowe asked if in coordinating with
Governor's guidelines, is there any indication regarding reversing course on reopening.
Morgan responded that staff has been tracking, using the hospitalization rate based on
percentage of people testing positive. He added that staff is tracking the number of people in
the hospital and capacity and there are currently twelve COVID-19 patients in Williamson
County. Jonrowe asked if the percentage is what is being followed. Morgan responded that
the City has been asking the County for that data and the hospitalization rate is best data
including the number of patients in the ICU and on ventilators. Jonrowe asked what the
magic number is to trigger roll backs, noting that the information could be two weeks behind.
Morgan responded that he doesn't have that information. Jonrowe stated that she is also
tracking numbers and hoping for more direction. She asked that staff please let Council know
when staff has that trigger information. Morgan responded that there is a call with the
Governor and sometimes cities are allowed to submit questions and he will do that.
Pitts asked related to pools, why June 151" instead of June 1st. Garrett responded to allow time
to call lifeguards and do training. Pitts asked if the rec center will be at 25% capacity. Garrett
responded yes. Pitts asked about indoor pool use. Garrett responded yes, up to 10 people
based on reservations. Pitts asked how long an appointment is. Garrett responded one and
half hour with 30-minute cleaning period after. Pitts asked about the July 411, event. Morgan
responded that citizens can see fireworks from many areas in the City and by eliminating the
events, but still have the fireworks, it allows some form of citizen participation. Pitts asked if
citizens would be allowed to setup in the grass to maximize capacity. Morgan stated that the
goals was to minimize capacity and staff would reevaluation as the Governor's orders change.
He added that due to the timing of the event staff needed to make decisions now. Pitts noted
his concerns with how to require people to stay in their cars, but he knows staff will work it
out. Pitts stated that he is fine with extending utility fee waivers for another 30 days and
asked if repeat offenders are aware of resources. Morgan yes, using Williamson and Burnet
Counties Opportunities (WBCO).
Fought stated great work by parks and recreation staff to open things up again, and
Popptober fest sounds great. He added that he is fine with extending fee waivers for another
30 days and supports what Mr. Triggs will propose.
Triggs stated that he likes the parks schedules. He added that related to utility fees he thinks
they should be extended, and the toughest months may be June and July. Triggs stated that
he agrees with Pitts regarding encouraging assistance programs. He noted that the
emergency orders should put in an ending date and he would like the emergency orders
ended by swearing in of new Council Members and Mayor after the November election.
Nicholson thanked staff for their leadership and asked about the capacity for daily summer
usage at the rec center. Garrett responded several hundred people each day, 300-400 people.
Nicholson stated that she is interested in the communication of the scheduling system.
Garrett responded that staff is working on communication right now and working with others
in the state to understand best practices. She added that not all portions will be open, and the
usage will be mainly for self -directed exercise on track, weight room, and lap swimming only.
Nicholson noted perception of fairness and asked if the teen center and courts will be closed.
Garrett responded correct, those areas will be used for summer camp and group exercise will
eventually spill out into the gym. She added that she also doesn't know when next
Governor's orders will be to change things. Nicholson thanked staff and had no questions
for Morgan.
Calixtro stated that she agrees with extending fee waivers and thanked staff for working
through this.
Mayor Ross stated that council is in favor of extending fee waivers for 30 days and supports
adding an end date to the disaster declaration. He asked that staff put that on a future agenda.
Ross clarified that Council could end the disaster declaration sooner than November if
needed. Morgan responded that staff will put both items on a future agenda.
Mayor Ross recessed the meeting at 4:55 p.m. and noted that Council would begin Executive
Session at 5:00 p.m.
Executive Session
In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon's Texas
Codes, Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to
action in the regular session.
D. Sec. 551.071: Consultation with Attorney
Advice from attorney about pending or contemplated litigation and other matters on which
the attorney has a duty to advise the City Council, including agenda items
- Litigation Update
- Retention of McGinnis Lockridge as Outside Counsel
Sec. 551.086: Certain Public Power Utilities: Competitive Matters
- Purchase Power Update
- Substation CIP
Sec. 551.074: Personnel Matters
- City Attorney Recruitment
Adjournment
Approved by the Georgetown City Council on
Date
Attest: Cit ecretary