HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 01.14.2020 CC-RNotice of a Meeting of the
Governing Body of the
City of Georgetown, Texas
Tuesday, antra 14, 2020
The Georgetown City Council will meet on Tuesday, January 14, 2020 at 6:00 PM at the Council
Chambers at 510 West 91" St., Georgetown, Texas.
The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined
under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon
request. Please contact the City Secretary's Office, at least three (3) days prior to the scheduled
meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 808 Martin Luther King, Jr Street for additional
information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711.
Mayor Ross called the meeting to order at 6:04 p.m. The following Council Members were in
attendance. Mayor Dale Ross; Mary Calixtro, Council Member District 1; Valerie Nicholson,
Council Member District 2; Mike Triggs, Council Member District 3; Steve Fought, Council
Member District 4; Kevin Pitts, Council Member District 5; Rachael Jonrowe, Council Member
District 6; and Tommy Gonzalez, District 7.
Regular Session
(This Regular session may, at any time, be recessed to convene an Executive Session for any
purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code 551.)
A. Call to Order
Invocation
- Charlie Turner with River Rock Bible Church provided the invocation.
Pledge of Allegiance
- Council Member Fought led both pledges.
Comments from the Mayor
- Presentation from Friends of the Library to Council
- Wolfgang Sunhnholz Proclamation
City Council Regional Board Reports
- Mayor Ross noted that here is a new chair for CAMPO.
Announcements
- There were no announcements.
Action from Executive Session
Motion by Nicholson to approve the ISDA 2002 Master Agreement with Mercuria Energy
America as discussed in Executive Session and approve a Resolution authorizing the Mayor
to execute the agreement with Mercuria Energy. Second by Fought.
Approved 7-0.
Motion by Nicholson to approve the Seventh Amendment to the Qualified Scheduling Entity
Services Agreement with the City of Garland as discussed in Executive Session. Second by
Fought.
Approved 7-0.
Motion by Nicholson to authorize the City Attorney to return the Class 5 Ballot in Case No.
19-11127-TMD in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court as discussed in Executive Session. Second by
Fought.
Approved 7-0.
Statutory Consent Agenda
The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non -controversial and routine that may be acted upon with
one single vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be discussed and
acted upon individually as part of the Regular Agenda.
B. Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes of the Workshop and Regular
Meetings held on December 10, 2019 and Special Meeting held on December 17, 2019 -- Robyn
Densmore, City Secretary
C. Consideration and possible action to appoint John Philpott as a new member to serve a
partial term on the Fire Fighters' and Police Officers' Civil Service Commission to fill a
vacancy -- David Morgan, City Manager
D. Consideration and possible action to approve a NIPA contract with Convergint
Technologies for security systems and installation in the amount of $56,051.27 for Fire
Station No. 6 and $55,129.71 for Fire Station No. 7 -- Eric Johnson, Facilities Director
E. Consideration and possible action to approve a DIR contract with Austin Structured Cabling
for Data Cabling and installation of a Station Alerting System in the amount of $36,520.40
for Fire Station No. 6 and $42,056.00 for Fire Station No. 7 -- Eric Johnson, Facilities Director
F. Consideration and possible action to approve a Resolution granting a license to encroach for
the placement of certain landscape features and signage in the right of way of Wolf Ranch
Parkway adjacent to the planned Wolf Ranch Section 1b; and to authorize the Director of
Planning to execute that amended license -- Travis Baird, Real Estate Services Manager
G. Consideration and possible action to approve a Resolution granting a license to encroach for
a waterline and wastewater line into City owned property known as the MoKan Corridor;
and to authorize the Director of Planning to execute the License --Travis Baird, Real Estate
Services
Motion to approve the entire Consent Agenda as presented by Gonzalez, second by
Nicholson.
Approved 7-0.
Legislative Regular Agenda
H. Consideration and possible action to approve Change Order #2 with Sierra Cedar for
implementation of an Enterprise Resource Planning system in the amount of $78,300.00 --
Leigh Wallace, Finance Director
Wallace presented the item by providing a summary of the project to date and reviewed the
Ten -Year Total Cost of Ownership. She then provided a project timeline, and phase one and
two accomplishments. Wallace noted that the change order was needed due to core business
functions overlapping with Workday Project support compounded by numerous and
extended vacancies in core full-time positions. She also noted that additional contractors and
temporary personnel budgeted for the project are not enough to mitigate risk and staff is
requesting one -month extension of Phase II Go Live date from March to April. Wallace the
noted the funding sources with $78,300.00 for time and expense for implementation
contractors to support the extension and the use of existing project budget added in FY2020
from bond proceed interest and IT fund savings. She then provided a summary.
Wallace read the caption.
Motion by Nicholson, second by Gonzalez.
Pitts asked if this change order was another added cost to a project that was already budgeted
for. Wallace responded that these funds are part of the project contingency budget. Pitts
asked how much remains in the contingency budget. Wallace responded approximately
$200,000.00 for FY2020. Pitts stated that this project that is taking a lot of time, with a lot of
expense already, and he really hates having to approve funds to keep the project going.
Wallace responded that she understands and doesn't like it either, but it is needed for audit
purposes.
Approved 7-0.
I. Consideration and possible action regarding a Resolution expressing City Council's
dissatisfaction to the Public Utilities Commission regarding customer service provided by
Suddenlink Communication on behalf of the citizens of the City of Georgetown and
declaring an effective date -- Charlie McNabb, City Attorney
McNabb presented the item and provided background on the Resolution.
Pitts stated that he saw no need for changes and the Resolution is similar to the one from
Victoria. He also clarified that this is not a resolution for a municipal owned cable company.
McNabb read the caption.
Motion by Pitts, second by Gonzalez.
Fought also asked for staff to come up with options for competition. David Morgan, City
Manager responded that information is coming. Fought offered to work with citizens in
getting complaints to Suddenlink. He added that Mr. Nance with Suddenlink offered to
resolve complaints directly and has been working on complaints received. Fought stated that
Mr. Nance deserves credit for work, but acknowledged issue not resolved
Pitts stated that the Mayor of Victoria reached out and thanked the Council for their work.
Jonrowe asked what happens with this Resolution and if it will be hand delivered. McNabb
responded that the Resolution directs staff to forward the document to the Public Utility
Commission and State representatives. Jonrowe asked if it will be emailed. McNabb
responded that staff can do email and certified mail. Jonrowe stated that she would
encourage both.
Brad Horner spoke on the item and repeated what he said before Executive Session. He added
that it is disheartening that Council will criticize Suddenlink when they can't handle their
own utilities. Horner mentioned issued with a City contractor and a submitted open records
request. He then mentioned issues with ATMOS gas.
Approved 7-0.
J. Consideration and possible action to approve a mural easement agreement with MBGH
Properties, LLC. for a portion of the 0.36-acre tract of land out of Block 1 of Snyder's Addition
to the City of Georgetown, and located at 702 E University Ave, for the placement of public
art -- Amanda Still, Arts and Culture Coordinator and Eric P. Lashley, Library Director
Lashley presented the item and noted that the mural will be on the west side of the store and
what would be contained in the mural.
Jonrowe noted the location of the West side of building and if the mural will be visible from
the parking lot. Lashley responded that if they are heading East on University it will. Jonrowe
asked about the visibility for people to stop and take pictures. Lashley responded that people
will be able to park and take pictures in the parking lot, not in the street.
Lashley read the caption.
Motion by Jonrowe, second by Nicholson.
Approved 7-0.
K. Consideration and possible action to approve a Funding Memorandum of Understanding
with MBGH Properties, LLC. for the placement of public art at 702 E University Ave --
Amanda Still, Arts and Culture Coordinator and Eric P. Lashley, Library Director
Lashley presented the item and noted that it is for the funding of the mural mentioned in Item
J.
Lashley read the caption.
Motion by Jonrowe, second by Nicholson.
Approved 7-0.
L. Consideration and possible action to approve an arts and culture grant application to the
National Endowment for the Arts for funding towards the Arts and Culture Board/Field of
Honor Arts Partnership -- Amanda Still, Arts and Culture Coordinator and Eric P. Lashley,
Library Director
Lashley presented the item and noted that it is to help veterans with recovery through the
arts and will add an arts component to the Field of Honor event.
Lashley read the caption.
Motion by Jonrowe, second by Nicholson.
Approved 7-0.
M. Consideration and possible action to approve an arts and culture grant application to the
Texas Commission on the Arts for funding towards the Arts and Culture Board/Field of
Honor Arts Partnership -- Amanda Still, Arts and Culture Coordinator and Eric P. Lashley,
Library Director
Lashley presented the item and noted that it is related to same program outlined in Item L.
Lashley read the caption.
Motion by Jonrowe, second by Nicholson.
Approved 7-0.
N. Consideration and possible action to approve an Operating Agreement between the City of
Georgetown and the Georgetown Cultural Citizen Memorial Association, Inc. concerning
the operation of the Shotgun House located at 801 West St. -- Eric P. Lashley, Library Services
Director
Lashley presented the item and provided the background and previous discussion between
staff and Council.
Fought asked if there had been a determination about fire suppression for the building.
Lashely responded that the value of House had been determined to be around $45,000.00 and
the costs related to adding fire suppression would be extreme. Fought stated that the
historical value of the building needs to be considered. Lashley responded that it can be put
in the budget. Morgan stated that this concern can easily be addressed through budget
requests.
Pitts commented on two old churches in Bell County that were lost and that he would be
happy to look at funding fire suppression due to community value.
Mayor Ross stated that it is the will of the Council to pursue funding for fire suppression.
Jonrowe noted that there are items in the home that are valuable also and should be
considered for preservation.
Mayor Ross asked Lashley when he could return to Council with additional information.
Lashley stated that staff could make it part of the budget process.
Gonzalez stresses the important of fire proofing all possible items in the home that are of
historic nature.
Lashley read the caption.
Motion by Jonrowe, second by Fought.
Approved 7-0.
O. Public Hearing and First Reading of an Ordinance for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone
76.51 acres out of the William Addison League, Abstract No. 21, from the Residential Single -
Family (RS) and Agriculture (AG) districts to the Residential Single -Family (RS) district,
for the property generally located along Maple Street, north of Westinghouse Rd and south
of W Ridge Line Blvd -- Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director
Nelson presented the item and reviewed the Location Map, Aerial Map, Future Land use and
Overall Transportation Plan, Moderate Density Use zoning, Zoning Map, and Residential
Single -Family zoning including what is allowed by right, with limitation, and with a Special
Use Permit. She then noted that area fully complies with all criteria for rezoning.
Nelson read the caption.
Mayor Ross opened and closed the Public Hearing at 7:02 p.m. as there were no speakers.
Motion by Nicholson, second by Pitts.
Gonzalez asked if there had been any consideration for retail or commercial space along the
Maple Street side. Nelson responded that there was not, but did reference a nearby project
that will have some.
Approved 7-0.
P. Public Hearing and First Reading of an Ordinance for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone
20 acres out of the William Addison Survey, Abstract No. 21 from the Residential Single -
Family (RS) district to the Agriculture (AG) district, for the property generally located at
2050 Rockride Lane -- Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director
Nelson presented the item and reviewed the Location Map, Aerial Map, and Zoning Map.
She added that this request for an expansion to the Ride on Center for Kids (ROCK) and
Agriculture is the only zoning designation that will allow this expansion. She then reviewed
the Future Land Use Map, and the High Density Residential, Mixed Used Community,
Employment Center and Agriculture zoning districts. Nelson then noted what is allowed in
the Agriculture zoning district by right, with limitations, and with a Special Use Permit. She
stated that the area mostly complies but did have some criteria for zoning where it partially
complied or did not comply. Nelson then stated that at their meeting on December 3, 2019,
the Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) recommended approval of the request with a 7-
0 vote.
Nelson read the caption
Mayor Ross opened the Public Hearing at 7:08 p.m.
Josh Beran with J&B Engineering introduced Nancy Krenek with ROCK (Ride on Center for
Kids). Ms. Krenek explained what ROCK is and how is serves the community through equine
therapy. She then noted that the current facility is at capacity. Mr. Beran then explained the
proposed expansion to the ROCK facility.
Motion by Pitts, second by Nicholson.
Approved 7-0.
Q. Public Hearing and First Reading of an Ordinance on proposed amendments to Chapter 3,
Applications and Permits, of the Unified Development Code relative to zoning variances for
sign area (Amendment No. 18); and Chapter 5, Zoning Use Regulations, and Chapter 16,
Definitions, of the Unified Development Code relative to certain uses in specific zoning
districts (Amendment No. 12 and 13) -- Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director
Nelson presented the item and provided an overview of the proposed changes related to
Contractor Services, Office/Warehouse uses, Storage Yards, Town Services and Impound
Lots, and sign variance options. She then noted that at their December 4, 2019 meeting, the
UDC Advisory Committee recommended approval with the following modifications: where
stated "...existing single-family home in the ETJ that is platted or planned for residential use
on the Future Land Use Map", replace the work "planned" to "designated"; and to add an
additional limitation to the Office/Warehouse specific use to limit access to loading and
storage areas to the side or rear of the building. Nelson also noted that at their January 7, 2020
meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval with the UDCAC's
recommended modifications.
Nelson read the caption.
Jonrowe noted that the presentation wasn't attached. Nelson responded that she will bring
them forward in the future. Jonrowe stated that have the presentation would be appreciated
and would benefit citizens as well. She the asked about the sign height and stated that she
was confused about real life implications of the change. Nelson responded that currently
property owners can ask for a sign variance for height, but not for sign area. Jonrowe asked
if people have been going through the PUD process to achieve sign needs. Nelson responded
that some have. Jonrowe asked about the appeal process for Zoning Board of Adjustment
(ZBA) decisions. Nelson responded that those decision are final.
Gonzalez asked how the changes will affect towing companies. Nelson responded by
providing a definition of towing services and explained that towing companies are identified
as a permitted use in the Industrial Zoning District. She then noted that currently it is not
clear that a paved surface is required. Gonzalez asked what qualifies for the approved paved
surface. Nelson responded concrete or asphalt. Gonzalez asked if the City has received input
for other desired materials. Nelson responded that the City standard is consistent with other
uses.
Nicholson stated that related to the sign changes, she was not entirely comfortable with them.
She then asked what would happen if a case came before the ZBA and how can the City
maintain aesthetic. Nelson responded that the applicant must state why their property
requires a special standard. She then stated that, if helpful, prior to the second reading she
will provide additional materials to clarify the change is sign allowances. Nicholson asked
Nelson to please provide notification details also.
Jonrowe asked if there a drainage requirement for the paved surfaced for towing companies.
Nelson responded that there are, and she will include that information with the other second
reading materials. Jonrowe noted that there are stringent drainage requirements for auto
body facilities. Nelson responded that drainage requirements are part of the site development
plan that is required. Jonrowe asked if those requirements would be required automatically.
Nelson responded yes and that the information will be provided with the second reading.
Mayor Ross opened the Public Hearing at 7:31 p.m.
Larry Brundidge discussed outside storage and noted examples all around town where
outside storage means different things. He also discussed neighborhoods where Industrial is
coming close to Residential and asked that Council look into height limitations for exterior
storage.
Mayor Ross closed the Public Hearing at 7:34 p.m.
Motion by Nicholson, second by Jonrowe.
Approved 7-0.
R. Consideration and possible action to approve a Municipal Services Agreement with EIDOM
Enterprises, LLC, for the provision of municipal services to an approximately 14.29-acre tract
in the William Robert Survey, Abstract No. 524 and a 0.979 acre portion of Shell Road, a right-
of-way of varying width described to Williamson County, Texas, generally located at 3700
Shell Road, upon annexation -- Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director
Nelson presented the item and reviewed the Location Map, Aerial Map, Future Land Use
Map, Annexation Process, and Tentative Schedule.
Nelson read the caption.
Motion by Gonzalez, second by Pitts.
Council had no comments or questions.
Approved 7-0.
S. Consideration and possible action to approve a Municipal Services Agreement with Danny
Seay, for the provision of municipal services to an approximately 1.38 acre tract of land out
of the William Addison Survey, Abstract No. 21 and a 0.39 acre portion of Old 1460 Trail, a
right-of-way of varying width of record described to Williamson County, Texas, generally
located at 1061 Old 1460 Trail -- Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director
Nelson presented the item and reviewed the Location Map, Aerial Map, Future Land Use
Map, Annexation Process, and Tentative Schedule
Nelson read the caption.
Motion by Pitts, second by Nicholson.
Calixtro asked if people have been notified in the surrounding area. Nelson responded yes,
those within 300 feet and she can get the exact date of the notification. Calixtro asked if staff
knew what was planned at the site. Nelson responded not yet, but that she can follow-up
with the applicant.
Approved 7-0.
T. Public Hearing and First Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of
Georgetown, Texas, approving an Amended and Restated Consent Agreement for the
Northwest Williamson County Municipal Utility District #2 (NWWCMUD #2), also known as
the Parmer Ranch MUD, pertaining to a proposed new subdivision in Williamson County,
Texas consisting of approximately 454 acres generally situated on the northeast
side of Williams Drive (RM 2338) at Ronald Reagan Boulevard and stretching from
Williams Drive to Somerset Hills Drive along both sides of Ronald Reagan Boulevard;
repealing conflicting ordinances and resolutions; including a severability clause; and
establishing an effective date -- Wayne Reed, Assistant City Manager
Reed presented the item and reviewed the purpose of the agreement, the Parmer Ranch Land
Plan, the MUD Policy, and next steps.
Reed read the caption.
Mayor Ross opened and closed the Public Hearing at 7:53 p.m. as there were no speakers.
Motion by Pitts, second by Gonzalez.
Jonrowe asked if Section 4.02 was in the agreement before. Reed responded that Sec 4.02
refers to a separate agreement that is part of the next item, Item U.
Approved 7-0.
U. First Public Hearing regarding a proposed Strategic Partnership Agreement (SPA) between
the City of Georgetown and the Northwest Williamson County Municipal Utility District No.
2 (NWWCMUD No. 2), providing for, among other things, the limited purpose annexation
of the area within NWWCMUD No. 2 boundaries -- Wayne Reed, Assistant City Manager
Reed presented the item and explained the benefit and process for a Strategic Partnership
Agreement and what it allows. He added that the MUD has already held its two public
hearings and explained the next steps.
Mayor Ross opened and closed the Public Hearing at 7:57 p.m. as there were no speakers.
Jonrowe asked if the agreement would relate to the 70 acres of commercial that is envisioned
for the MUD. Reed responded correct. Jonrowe asked if the commercial would likely draw
in people from outside the MUD. Reed responded correct.
Jonrowe asked if this would lead to people outside the MUD helping to finance improvements
in the MUD. Reed responded that there are two revenue streams, one being bonds used for
infrastructure. He added that a SPA is initiated by a municipality. Reed continued that the
MUD will collect the sales to be used for eligible expenses. Jonrowe asked what qualified to
be eligible expenses. Reed responded that it would be up to the MUD Board to determine
what would qualify for reimbursement.
No Council is action is required for this item.
V. Second Reading of an Ordinance to close and abandon a portion of 6th Street pursuant to
Section 311.007 of the Texas Transportation Code, for the safety and public benefit of the
municipality at large, to the City of Georgetown, Texas; and to authorize the mayor to
execute all documents necessary to complete the abandonment -- Travis Baird, Real Estate
Services Manager
Mayor Ross recessed for a break at 8:00 p.m. and noted that Council will start again at 8:10
p.m. Item V was taken up after the break.
Baird presented the item and provided the background on the possible abandonment. He
then reviewed the encroachment, the area to be abandoned and provided the following
additional information: the encroachment will reduce the right of way profile to a width
below that identified for this roadway in the Downtown Master Plan; however, the major
components of the Plan will continue to be met; street parking on the south side of 6th Street
would not be possible and loss would be compensated for by increased spaces provided by
the garage; and street trees/street side landscaping and sidewalks would be installed as called
for in the Master Plan. Baird then provided a visual representation of the possible streetscape.
Baird read the caption.
Motion by Pitts, second by Fought.
Bill Russell has lived on 6th Street for almost 70 years. He noted that 61h Street become a major
East and West thoroughfare, feels the garage would create accidents, and feels the garage is a
bad idea.
John Foliot suggested there is a transparency problem because no one knows why this spot
was selected. He noted that the provided image looks like it will be out of compliance with
the UDC and downtown design guidelines. Foliot stated that here has been no public input
and asked that Council reconsider the project.
Larkin Tom gave her time to Larry Olsen. Mr. Olsen will speak later in the order.
Peter Dana gave his time to Ross Hunter.
Ross Hunter stated that there has not public involvement in the process and the general public
has not been involved since 2015. He asked that the abandonment be voted down and noted
that not all current councilmembers were in discussions in Executive Session. Hunter stated
that he feels the law could have possibly been broken and haven't evaluated different ideas
and should consider Council Member Triggs suggestion for a property assessment.
Chris Damon, owner of the building where Gumbo's restaurant is located, stated that parking
is common problem and he has heard about a parking garage for years. He added that this
project is moving at a glacial speed and this one parking structure will not solve all issues.
Damon added that this is a great first step, businesses downtown like this location, this
structure is where the problem is and close enough so people will use it.
Larry Brundidge gave his time to Liz Weaver.
Liz Weaver stated that walking three blocks to get to the Square is not a big deal; noted the
possible costs and design of the garage; and size of vehicles potentially using the garage. She
also noted that here is a large parking lot farther South where there would be a larger garage
and the current location is questionable.
Michael Warden gave his time to Karen Soeffker.
Karen Soeffker, co-owner of All Things Kids and Scoops Ice Cream, noted that the proximity
of the garage to Square is important and she wants families to enjoy downtown area. She also
noted that her store's ice cream might be partly to blame for the parking issue.
Rebecca Pfiester, who was born in Georgetown, noted the pride and joy she feels related to
the Square and fears that a large parking garage will be regrettable. She asked that Council
please consider other options.
Sam Pfiester, who owns property on the Square, asked when the location was picked; why is
this the right location; how much is the cost per parking space; the parking study is out of
date but still valid; and asked about a comprehensive downtown sidewalk program being
done.
Terry Scanlon stated that the large ugly box is too big for this location; the item is to take space
away from Sixth Street; and downtown is a precious jewel.
Shuler Paige, owner of Gumbo's restaurant, stated that it is great to be in Georgetown and he
knows the owners of All Things Kids and has seen downtown blossom over the years. He
added that parking is a problem; customers have problems getting to the restaurant due to
parking; and extra parking is needed as continual growth will add to the issue.
Shawn Hood, has had a business on the Square on the last 20 years, stated that the parking
problem has led to his staff working from home and he is the only member of his staff that
has to park near the Square and he has a hard time finding somewhere to park. He added
that he is on the Steering Committee and believes that there is a good plan in the works that
can fall within HARC guidelines.
Ann Seaman, lives on Church Street, stated that more parking is needed but she is not fond
of this location. She added that here is no comparison with the suggested site and other sites
and there has been no consideration for the lot being in a transition zone.
Brad Strittmatter, a downtown property owner with several businesses in the downtown area,
stated that there is a need for parking in downtown area and he understands the concerns of
residents. He added that he is open to hear other suggestions for locations, but there are very
few and where are the "outer limits" of downtown. Strittmatter stated that this location
would provide much needed parking for downtown businesses to thrive and if people can't
come and park downtown, businesses could suffer.
Ann Hagman, has lived in Georgetown for 20.5 years, stated that there is a need for more
parking. She added that there are a few people that are trying to drive growth based on
money and she doesn't want the Square to become another Sixth Street in Austin. Hagman
stated that she likes the view of downtown from the highway and wants the parking garage
location to be reevaluated. She added that she would like a moratorium on all construction
in the area; would like to end incentives; and asked Council not to push through this item.
Deb Sanford gave time to Pam Mitchell.
Pam Mitchell, resident living on College Street, stated that there has been an absence of fiscal
transparency. She referenced the City's electric fund and noted costs concerns for the garage.
Mitchell stated that the City needs to properly manage expenses; the City is over budget; there
has been a lack of transparency; and the project is over budget and off timeline.
Michael Spano gave time to Larry Olsen.
Larry Olsen noted that there are downtown parking challenges due to growing dining,
shopping, recreation, and employment centers. He then shared his research with Council
about different trolley programs done throughout the country and provided his suggestion
for the Red Poppy Trolley program.
Larkin Tom noted that Mr. Olsen s proposal is visionary and should be considered and her
biggest concern is the lack of appropriate feeling of the parking garage for downtown.
Eric Visser stated that he has a vested interest in the Square, but not this corner. He added
that what is being voted on is related to the right-of-way, not aesthetics. Visser stated that he
has friends on both sides of the issue, and he feels the biggest fear if that of the unknown. He
added that the City can talk about it for another five years or spring into action. Visser stated
that parking is not just a problem at events, but every day of the week and if you build it they
will come and if you don't build it they will come. He noted that people concerned in the
nearby area will have to deal with patrons parking on the street in front of the homes.
Russ Phillips, business owner on the Square, said he supports moving forward. He added
that he is a former P&Z Commissioner and was involved in trip to Plano to view Ross Perot's
legacy development. Phillips stated that people are not willing to walk more than 1,100 ft per
the Perot Study and lack of parking could been seen as sales leakage. He added that waiting
could lead to losing financial ground. Phillips said that someone can always find a reason not
to do something and every decision comes with a cost. He added that he supports a parking
garage downtown.
Pitts noted that a recurring note among speakers was the need for more public comment. He
said he has received comments from many people after sending a text message to anyone in
his phone that lived or worked downtown. Pitts continued that he asked if anyone wanted
more parking and 80% of the respondents said yes. He then said that he saw the negative
feedback related to the garage. Pitts stated that, with the help of seven friends, he went to
every business between Sixth and Ninth and Rock and Church Streets and asked the
following questions:
- Do you believe parking for customers and/or employees is important for the success of
your business?
o 95% of respondents said yes.
- Are you aware the City of Georgetown is currently in consideration to build a new
parking garage at Sixth and Main?
o 87% of respondents said yes.
- Would you be supportive of the City building a new parking garage at Sixth and Main
that will provide 200 spaces of free public parking?
o 80% of respondents said yes.
- Do you provide consent to have your name used in relationship to the survey?
o 70% of respondents said yes.
Pitts stated that he informed the people helping him with the survey that the intent was not
give their opinions but seek out the opinions of others. He added that goal was to ask the
questions, get the responses and then have dialogue. Pitts stated that Williamson County Sun
responded by saying that they had never been asked about the garage, parking is not
important to their business, but the alleyway behind their business is very important. He
added that Sam Pfiester stated that he did not feel a garage was needed yet and Council
should consider another alternative such a trolley that connects existing surface parking and
improving the downtown sidewalk system. Pitts stated that Chett Garner with Daytripper
World Headquarters thought that building a parking garage on top of an existing parking lot
would a way to maximize land use and if the parking garage was not built the parking issue
would spill over into the nearby neighborhoods. He added that Steve Mandray, current
owner of the former city Council building, is trying to find a restaurant tenant and the first
question he is asked is about parking. Pitts then stated that he worked with Preservtion
Georgetown to send out a three -question survey. The questions had 13 respondents and the
questions were:
- Are you concerned about overflow parking from downtown businesses encroaching into
adjacent neighborhoods?
o 11 responded said yes.
- Would you be supportive of the City building a new parking garage at Sixth and Main
that would provide 200 spaces of free parking?
o 11 respondents said no.
- The third question was regarding consent to use the names of those that took the survey.
o 11 respondents said yes.
Pitts noted that downtown Georgetown used to be a "ghost town" years ago. He added that
the Downtown Master Plan that is in place had led to downtown looking the way it does
today. Pitts stated that to keep downtown in its current state the City needs parking. He
continued that another, larger lot would lead to added costs. Pitt stated that if the City built
a large parking garage that was unused it would lead to a different set of concerns. He noted
that the size and costs of the lot is what is needed now to get something on the ground. Pitts
added that the garage will lead to private reinvestment going back into downtown. He
concluded by stating that he will support this item and would also support the idea of a
trolley.
Jonrowe noted her general observations of just because someone says something you don't
like doesn't mean they don't have a point. She stated that many good points have made
tonight regarding accessibility, size, height, design, amount of discussions in executive
session, and cost per space. Jonrowe stated that she hasn't heard anyone say no garages ever
but has heard people say to go back to the 2015 Parking Study and do what that document is
suggesting by identifying and weighing the pro and cons of all possible garage locations. She
noted that she has been in many of the discussions and she can't pinpoint when this location
was decided, which she finds concerning. Jonrowe noted that if it bothered her as a Council
Member she understands how it would bother a citizen. She stated that evaluating all
possible sites would be a good middle ground to determine the best site. Jonrowe continued
that there is a good option two and half blocks away from the current site that, isn't her first
choice, but would better meet the City's needs by providing more spaces, more handicap
spaces, cheaper per space, and closer to many businesses. She added that she would prefer
that the Council get more information and make the smart decision about what works best
for everybody.
Gonzalez mentioned the talk and discussion about selecting a new site. He noted that many
Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) projects were done without public debate of location.
Gonzalez stated that many citizens noted cost overrun, but Council had yet to determine the
design for the garage. He stated that Council is being asked to vote on the ROW so that the
garage can move forward, not the design. Gonzalez also stated that he would like to see
where the City is over on cost as only estimates have been used at this point. He continued
that if the Council waits another two years the price of the garage will only increase. Gonzalez
then noted the City has major parking at every corner of downtown except that one. He
added that this is an attractive project to get the City a few years down the road as a stop gap.
Gonzalez noted that the parking garage has been the topic of discussion since he's been on
the Council. He concluded that this is the right time for this garage and if at any point some
aspect seems unfeasible, he will not approve.
Fought stated Council has been arguing about need for parking for his entire tenure on
Council and Council need to do something. He noted that his principle argument is handicap
accessibility. Fought continued that he can support the reasons for moving ahead and this
site will provide handicap accessibility. He stated that he will support the garage.
Triggs stated the he doesn't like hearing that this property is being used as a stop gap. He
added that Council should look at other locations and he understands the need for parking.
Triggs continued that he doesn't want to make a long process out of the situation. He noted
that the larger the structure, the less cost per space and other locations would provide more
spaces. Triggs said that the proposed location would lead to existing spaces being lost during
construction. He said that there is not enough information at the time to decide on this
location and he has financial concerns. Triggs stated that he doesn't understand why Council
is voting tonight on the ROW when the final decision is still a ways away. He added that he
will not support tonight the project tonight because he is newer to Council. Triggs then stated
that people who are concerned about transparency should know that this topic has been
brought up twice with only a few people in attendance. He concluded that this is the first
vote when people have showed up and he doesn't appreciate emails suggesting back room
deals.
Nicholson stated that she doesn't want to repeat what has already been said. She noted that
she will to talk with anyone about the garage at any time. Nicholson noted that her role as a
Council Member is to be a steward of the future, including financials, and she is not thinking
about 0-5 years but thinking 20+ years down the road. She stated that Council relies heavily
on staff as experts and staff needs to be held accountable, but they are the experts. Nicholson
noted that she has been involved in public discussion of the garage over the past 18 months
where the Council has received information from staff. She added there are three City lots
available, the Bluebonnet Lot which is the lot in question, the Red Poppy lot, and the Daisy
lot. Nicholson stated that the Daisy Lot provides ample parking for now but made need to
be considered for expansion in the future. She noted that the Red Poppy Lot is larger and
would cost more. Nicholson continued that she chooses to rely on staff guidance as subject
matter experts and Council should consider setting maximum cost per space. She stated that
the item tonight is to allow moving forward and there has been no final design selected.
Calixtro stated that she is the newest Council Member and asked if this site goes forward,
how long until The City need another garage. Morgan responded that there is not a defined
period of time on how long this garage will provide relief. He continued that it depends on
the growth of downtown and anticipation over next year or two. Calixtro then asked why
the City waited so long to look at possible garage locations. She added that there is a smaller
lot, but she would prefer the Red Poppy Lot across from Tax Office. Calixtro stated that with
everything she heard tonight she doesn't feel that is the best location for the garage.
Approved 4-3 (Nicholson, Fought, Pitts, and Gonzalez for and Calixtro, Triggs, and
Jonrowe against).
W. Second Reading of an Ordinance for the Voluntary Disannexation of 80.929 acres, located in
the J. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 608 -- Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director
Nelson presented the item and noted that there had been no changes since the first reading.
Nelson read the caption.
Motion by Jonrowe, second by Fought.
Approved 7-0
X. Second Reading of an Ordinance related to the Energy Risk Management Policy — Daniel
Bethapudi, General Manager of the Electric Utility
Bethapudi presented the item and provided a timeline of actions up until this point in time.
Bethapudi read the caption.
Motion by Nicholson, second by Gonzalez.
Approved 7-0.
Y. Second Reading of an Ordinance of the City of Georgetown, TX, amending the FY2020
Annual Budget due to conditions that resulted in new program requirements in the current
year, due to the timing of capital projects and other expenditures approved in the prior year;
appropriating the various amounts thereof; and repealing all ordinances or parts of
ordinances in conflict therewith -- Paul Diaz, Budget Manager
Diaz presented the item and noted that there had been no changes since the first reading.
Diaz read the caption.
Motion by Gonzalez, second by Nicholson.
Approved 7-0.
Z. Second Reading of an Ordinance establishing the classifications and number of positions
(Strength of Force) for all the City of Georgetown Fire Fighters and Police Officers pursuant
to Chapter 143 of the Texas Local Government Code pertaining to Civil Service -- Tadd
Phillips, Director of Human Resources
Phillips presented the item and provided an explanation of the need for the Ordinance.
Phillips read the caption.
Motion by Pitts, second by Nicholson.
Approved 7-0.
Project Updates
AA Project updates and status reports regarding current and future transportation and traffic
project; street, sidewalk, and other infrastructure projects; police, fire and other public safety
projects; economic development projects; city facility projects, city technology projects and
downtown projects including parking enhancements, city lease agreements, sanitation
services, and possible direction to city staff -- David Morgan, City Manager
Morgan introduced Aly Van Dyke the new Communications Director.
Public Wishing to Address Council
On a subject that i sted on this agenda! Please fill out a speaker registration form which can be found on
the table at the entrance to the Council Chamber. Clearly print your name and the letter of the item on which
you wish to speak and present it to the City Secretary on the dais, prior to the start of the meeting. You will
be called forward to speak when the Council considers that item. Only persons who have delivered the
speaker form prior to the meeting being called to order may speak. Speakers will be allowed up to three
minutes to speak.
On a subject not posted on the agenda: An individual may address the Council at a regular City Council
meeting by contacting the City Secretary no later than noon on the Wednesday prior to the Tuesday meeting,
with the individual's name and a brief description of the subject to be addressed. Only those persons who
have submitted a timely request will be allowed to speak. The City Secretary can be reached at (512) 931-
7715 or cso)georgetown.org. Speakers will be allowed up to three minutes to speak.
AB At the time of posting, no persons had signed up to address the City Council.
Executive Session
In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon's Texas Codes,
Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in
the regular session.
AC Sec. 551.071: Consultation with Attorney
Advice from attorney about pending or contemplated litigation and other matters on which
the attorney has a duty to advise the City Council, including agenda items
- PEC Franchise
- Litigation Update
Sec. 551.072: Real Estate Matters
- Right of Way acquisition from Kids Kottage (Parcel 1), Old Airport Road Realignment Project
Sec. 551.086: Certain Public Power Utilities: Competitive Matters
- Purchase Power Update
- QSE Agreement with Garland Power and Light
- Demand Response Joint Solution Agreement with Links EP LLC
- ISDA Agreement with Mercuria Inc.
Sec. 551:074: Personnel Matters
City Manager, City Attorney, City Secretary and Municipal Judge: Consideration of the
appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal
Adjournment
Motion by Gonzalez, second by Pitts.
Approved 7-0.
Adjourned at 9:51 p.m.
Approved by the Georgetown City Council oAALLYLA
nPti
. 12L
Date
a."
. Q �, Dale Ross, MayorAttest-, City Secretary