HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 03.13.2018 CC-WNotice of Meeting of the
Governing Body of the
City of Georgetown, Texas
Tuesday, March 13, 2018
The Georgetown City Council will meet on Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 4:00 PM at the Council Chambers, at 101
East 71h St., Georgetown, Texas
The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you
require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable
assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City Secretary's
Office, at least three (3) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 113 East 8t'
Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711.
Mayor Ross, called the meeting to order at 4:00 PM. All Councilmembers were in attendance, with the exception of
Anna Eby, Councilmember District 1, John Hesser, Councilmember District 3 and Tommy Gonzalez,
Councilmember District 7. Mayor Ross, Valerie Nicholson, Councilmember District 2, , Steve Fought,
Councilmember District 4, Ty Gipson, Councilmember District 5, and Rachael Jonrowe, Councilmember District 6
were in attendance. Councilmember Eby joined the meeting at 4:30 PM.
Policy Development/Review Workshop — Call to order at 4:00 PM
A. Presentation and discussion of the City's annual year-end external audit and Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report (CAFR) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 -- Elaine S. Wilson, Controller
Leigh Wallace, the City's Finance Director, recognized the accounting and budget staff for their hard work on
the year-end report for 2017. Wallace thanked the Council for their approval last year allowing the Finance
Department two new positions, a Treasurer and an Assistant Controller. She said both have been very
instrumental in helping the City better serve internal customers as well as better serve the Council.
City Controller, Elaine Wilson, spoke on the annual year end external audit and the CAFR for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2017. She began the presentation with the Background and Terms.
• CAFR — Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
■ GAAP — Generally Accepted Accounting Principals
o Rules and standards by which all financial reporting is presented and prepared
o Not the same as budgetary accounting
• GASB — Governmental Accounting Standards Board
o The oversight body for accounting standards for governmental entities
Wilson spoke on the Reporting Requirement and Audience
• Required by state law, City Charter and Bond Covenants
o Prepare statements and supplemental information
o Conduct annual audit
• Demonstrates fiduciary accountability to citizens, bondholders and granting agencies
• Primary audience is technical, not the "average person"
o Governmental accounting professionals, bond rating analysts, etc.
o Used to evaluate credit worthiness, economic stability and financial standing
Wilson described the Independent Audit and the Contents
+ Performed by outside independent audit firm
• Selected by Council
• Conducted in compliance with Government Auditing Standards
■ Provides assurance of accurate reporting and financial integrity
■ Compliance with policies
CONTENTS
Ih Tft000CT*V
0,11-1 • t h A.'4' AIJOrTO� S NQORT
M4NAOElYENTd pSC1Iba101i1 AIS ANAl1'!b
RNANCMI STATDA'M
Oawswrrri,rAM I FuN
bi+..s ', s. � .rn •., .+:•,.ii r.Sa.s, 1.� 1r -•r
I NOW$ to the nw.[ W bhnwtU I
R6
I 0UINED !U"LEWWARY WONNATION I
�I M— !.r' 41 AA
A Summary Statement of Net Position was shown and Wilson explained that this is virtually the balance
sheet. She noted that the statement summarizes financial activities into revenue and expense. Wilson said
the bottom number is the same as the statement of net position, just categorized differently. She explained
that the increases in governmental revenue include sales tax, property tax, and EMS revenue and that the
utility revenue is also due to grow. Wilson said the expense increases are due to operational programming
and personnel expenditures across the board.
Summary Statement of Activities
(in thousands)
Taal Awmnws
L -q w""
Ruzre-:z Type
Tvg1 Epwmn
fJiangi- IY•vg pu1lr.e.
101 p tost-un 24 ynxriy
Nin Posman - Ending
To01 Primary 3;otin
2017
2018
S x33 $14
6
227.216
.20741
70 Tt1
.
42 M29
t tis 95l
(<
r77.!'!9
=y�920
Si Its
rYri raPj
4 ' 4*Fi
6 T43.Si2
6
664.622
Wilson spoke on the Modified Approach to Street Assets.
• Modified Approach adopted in 2005 for streets infrastructure
• Option for reporting the condition of the infrastructure instead of depreciating the infrastructure
o Provides accountability to maintain streets
• Council adopted a pavement condition index (PCI) of 85 to maintain the streets in "good" condition
o Reviewed every 3 years
o Reviewed in 2014 — current condition rated at 87.5
o Updated Review in progress
External Auditor, Adam McCane from Weaver and Tidwell, spoke next. He recognized the City's Accounting
Team and said that he greatly appreciated them and all of their hard work.
McCane explained the Audit Process.
• Audit Standard — Performed the audit in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards
(GARS) and Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS)
• Single Audit — Performed the single audit of federal awards in accordance with the Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards
(Uniform Guidance)
• Compliance — Performed tests of the City's compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations,
contracts and grant agreements, including items such as compliance with PFIA
■ Risk -Based Approach focused on specific risks
o Capital expenditures and capital projects
o General expenditures, payroll expenditures and accruals
o Utility revenue
o Various tax revenues
o Federal grant revenues and expenditures
• Walkthroughs of accounting controls over significant transaction cycles
o Federal receipts
o Cash disbursements
o Payroll
o Utility revenue
o Tax revenue
o Capital projects
■ Identification of major financial assistance programs
o Major programs — Airport Runway Project
• Tested internal controls over financial reporting and compliance
• Tested compliance with major program requirements
• Testing of financial statement balances using a combination of analytics, vouching of material
transactions and sampling
McCane spoke on Audit Results and Required Communications to Those in Charge of Governance.
Audit Results weaver>
We will issue the Independent Auditor's Report on the financial
statements
We will issue the Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control
over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters
Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed In
Accordance with Government Auditing Standards
✓ NO h•<1'•:_ly mile -::1
We issued the Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance for
Each Major Program and on Internal Control Over Compliance
Required by Uniform Guidance and Uniform Grant Management
Standards
✓ Ur.mrjr;6;d opm-.r
✓ One Eindir� noted
>i
Required Communications to Those in weaverjo,
Charge of Governance
Communication
Auditor's responsibility under
'he firanci it statemfartsare Il,c- resp*arsibiify
accepted auditing
Of Irk ,ity :')or woo it
generally
c,,,ow<ifwr witl,GAA:irfthrU 3 ano
standards (GRAS)
{mw t;r>f rfr r„f,nahl�r<r+l•rf,t,rf f)}:yf_i1
assurar-_e that the firancial staten erts cre
h=e of material misstatement Com -,,r
rE-,pof•.Nohty K to an opi"On
Mf thtr Ir•-anCKfl ktt f.Rrrse2rf} prgtf(;rr<l
by mr7r'..•ryry rnr_n1''AlIth yo�.r c}vrrv<70 arc fall),
presented in Hyl material resp-ects. in
corfcrmrty vnth U.S, f-reraly accepted
Ctr.c nur'iLCigrjnr'icR)k`i Oorof 1t--
flnor'"Id stole twritj ootY f,ol foove. ri,)o of
niprG( nir;nt pf yo.,rrr..Npr)r,ulslLrj,
't•.Sc a,dit of the fiscal year 23 17 finarcid
i1c.11gnlrrili nt]t Y>';rr.<i�nil�Pafril v'r<1 'nr
�tiUPff r7 Vnfr'r,}Clifirr7 "c_Irf:pr” iif;rnKir
ii
Required Communications
to Those in weaver,
Charge of Governance
Auditor's Responsibility under
Government Auditing
Standards
In cda tion to the GAASresponsibifies we
arg fe(j,)r-O tc7 Klur a vvnttrr r6pofI On v.,r
CCXsKllIatfonof �WerralCor,frOlsor<f
idcr.hfid<; iKlndiCf',nt vc;GCfBrprc, rnck,Ur`<)
material vreaknesses if ony. (7--rreporls do
rot pfovi le assurarce on infernal controls
Jing arNr Jn :;,,r o irp1 to provCB frasnrtabk,
UsNrraor'Cr of of;fr;Cf o(I ir"alend
mKSfat{-rr'+pnrc n9si,lhncj lrpnt rgrCnntr;IKrnC@
will, provisions of c rtracts or grant
agreements fl -cif have a direct or material
effec,tonthrftr(lr),xil fafrryNgrfs Virryjf)ra
o v nttrfn r(-porI or 11�4e- re si Its of fheju
h<Jw/@v$r. rer)ort {furl np1
express cr opinion on eon,piarce.
NO to i•��f�-
r7
Required Communications to Those in weaver
Charge of Governance
Communication Resulti
Auditor Responsibility under Our testing rtludes al major feaaral firanc)ol
<niofi)nr_ e pn �c7rc)ns 'Pl e r5{;c;rt qn s,,< n
Uniform Guidance irc5hr a, gnrl Cjr raker iKln;fu:c:nt t ehr. )rr <ies ;
.r11e-r r• )1 c prdnil over owy,i -ior<.e,
matenal w<akneesses'we rdentdy, :Our report
:toes not provide ass,rance on internal
�;;r•In_;I;>vr7r;,am,;lK)na;c Vi$ pr_.rtnrrr.crl
(xip,rc.'.,r^•";y fair ti ir.. {;,dpi ice cit On
ci{)r•rnr'; :;n Mwff, rr't)r;y fi,-j,an:J (ul+; r<;ra
assistance prograrts have beenadmirrsterc,a
in cc•mFyiance with app4i_aUe krn•s and
re�l;,k)Or ins
+r•r r;.,(W .:,I th, tn+:r:;l ye-en17 rVI(Aor rr(irroj
and state fincr;;d assistance programs has
been con-,pletea and vie iss :ed an
„rni(;ryEK;d p,�Fv(rti Vi r, rr,yXfeU ;}re
'110t, -Wil we <)knrss r` o tr_rrlul ri;nlrcjl pvw
:_:7+5{iK_)nCr, 121) 1 J Sllilf
f)1
Required Communications to Those in weaver
Charge of Governance
Communication
Unusual transactions and the
The srgrikant acccunt;ngf-�-liaes used by
adoption of new accounting
tttr; Qty c re i,FsrnUed m. thB trrdnCKd
principles
'here .•rare no rsvr GASB's that had a
sgnifirart rnpact on the laity's ficancial
itptements dur)r,_t ft'� Veer
V1? note -, N1 no frOntUtif nye r+trrr(i rite by thr
City durirg the year for ''-d Ach there is a lack
of a,:thoritaWe guidarce or corsensLi
Required Communications to Those in weaver>
Charge of Governance
RTORWTR�
frc:ud anal iliegnl acts N�. n-atend errors :rrec -len4e•s or 11 -z -gal aJs
wryer rn0I
Material weakness in internal control No rnatend wecimesses noted.
,.'7t1'.Cr IrIfc,(matlor) OIItzSIf:CC1 in Vi r,, I;r SVKIer:Urt",nrtdr;tejr� k3 5in^urns On
rlcA-.uments cpntcwvq oti<hft:<1 ntrzrmafi;r accor'.oaryi^.g
linanr:gal 5lcjlr nu::nts
the firancrnl staternc-15. Wi- perform=:d
'hated prcc f- Aures ar, the 1 ID$A and Ad rot
or, it inti mr -CA(a)
i!r{iOk3:ni_tiif:jr•y v;r`�li,�cswlYe _.`n�XrreU
and rrcnr.aL d to underlying cc cc rfir--�
and ::cher records ,.sed io prnJpafe the basic
f!nenctd statements
Manarrement judgments and Maragement'sestrnates were evaluated
occountirlp estinxites Gno delermrr.;tt to oe r-crsor�jt�lc in relOfYyn
tp thor f'rr'4rii:Kr1stGferre;ntsGi G Whpt-
i
Required Communications to Those in weaver>
Charge of Governance
Communication -'r
Difficulties encountered
Management representations
Management consultations
Auditor independence
Audit adjustments
No crffi--Ales cr drsagyec;rnents arose d..nng
tfle rrn-not: Ot >Ur Glc<at
We requested certain representations from
mrrcj(�,rnenl thatwer-inCk'derj in the
morxj9ement repeseotafron {-tier
Gre nGl LI'm're Sit n'at lrl C<;J@rr'ejni
sultati,ri with othco, ucco;- r tants for a
second opfibr.
No irdeperdence issues noted
Frnfrs}r.>r;rl storlrioroyre,:pire us to
occunr_Icte all kr=wmcrd ikety
misstcten-,erts denfifiz d durirg th.e audrl.
other Wan those that are trivial and
?'r a r-.�r'u;G1:- ffu-rn hj ihn e.: pl ;�--) Krlelr-ve,1
pl rr'lrnr,c)r-nv rf Wr; hovr; ,c�rnrr,,:rr�.r)fr rj
al sc,cT erfr es to mcrag—ienl.
Required Communications to Those in weaver
Charge of Governance
Communkation
Other material written Nothing to note
communications between weaver
and Tidwell, L.L.P., and the City
Councilmember Fought thanked McCane for the report and asked about the one finding and the expected
timing of resolution. Assistant City Manager, Laurie Brewer, explained that it had already been resolved and
the finding was for not reporting an additional asset. She said the full explanation is included in the report.
She explained that the additional asset represented TXDOT funded improvements which have added value
that was not initially recognized. She noted that a person has now been hired by the City to monitor grant
projects, etc. and properly record additional value that may come from them.
B. Presentation and discussion regarding amendments to the Unified Development Code (UDC) relating to
Mobile Food Vendors -- Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director
Planning Director, Sofia Nelson, provided a presentation regarding UDC amendments related to mobile food
vendors. She explained that the purpose of the presentation was to gain feedback on the direction to take
with the permitting process for mobile food vendors.
Nelson explained that the presentation would be broken into 4 parts.
■ Part 1 — Recap of past presentations
• Part 2 — Summary of work with the UDC Advisory Committee
• Part 3 — Request Direction from the City Council
Nelson recapped the current requirements and the previous workshop meeting directions and provided a
Project Timeline. She said the purpose was to answer the questions of how and when should food truck
vendors meet our community and development standards and is the treatment of food truck vendors
equitable with brick and mortar businesses.
Part 1- Recap of Previous
Workshop
Vendor without
Fixed Site
Only applies to vendc
that sell at constructii
sites, neighborhood
and special events.
":i3s'!A I;; ii:::iii
The use of city parks"
or ROW would require
a special event permit.
A
Accessory Use
A mobile food vendc
that supplements a
primary brick and mor
development.
'24hrs + Temporary
Use Permit Requirec
(90 days)
Part 2- Outreach
• Three meetings held-
- October 1 VI
- December 13`1
- January 10t1
Primary Use
A mobile food vendor
that is the primary use
and does not need a
brick and mortar
development. A
• Feedback Received-
- Concerns were expressed about enforcement of the
times the trucks would be on-site and how inspections
would occur
- The representatives of the properties using the food
trucks asked for 72 hour windows of time before
forcing a temporary use permit.
Councilmember Jonrowe asked if any brick and mortar business owners had attended these meetings and if
they had been specifically invited. Nelson said the targets had been those utilizing mobile food vendors and
the mobile food vendors themselves. Nelson said staff is seeking direction from the Council to determine if
they would like more public outreach conducted.
Jonrowe asked about enforcement of the times that trucks are allowed on site and if that refers to the 24
hours or Thursday through Sunday. Nelson said it is in reference to the 24 hours. She explained that if
someone asked to stay 24 hours, they would not need a permit. She said staff wanted to ensure that if a
vendor was to leave for a brief amount of time, they would not have to start yet another permit or another 24
hours.
Nelson provided a Recommendation for Transient Use, Accessory Use and Primary Use and provided
information on each.
Transient Use
4 ,.
1'111�1'•r IrICILide food t,L,r_ks 1hi
CG"'.(_' t(J a site' fur e'ver'15.
Local Exarrip:t,:1
Creak and RentsO: Cre,,v(� ry
W-1
r � i
A
•
Transient Use
Primary Use Required
Commercial district
Multi -family district Connection to Utilities Not Allowed
Public Facilities,
Industrial, Business Time Trucks permitted Thursday through
Park, Mixed Use Sunday. May not operate when primary use
is closed.
districts
§tte Reguirementsp
■ Maximum Numberof Food Trucks- 2
Shall meet location
and parking ermi Ing o ermi equire excep
� when seeking to have a truck outside
requirements of ermitted da s.
Enforcement: Amenities- Not Permitted
Complaint based
Accessory Use
• Mobile food vendor that supplements a primary
brick and mortar development.
Local Example: Je Suis Coffee on 91Street
AR
31�1ti
Accessory Use
Primary Use Required
C-1 and C3 districts,
Industrial, Business
Connection to electric service
Park, Mixed Use
permitted
districts
Time- 1 year temporary permit. May not
SM Renlllrements:
operate when primary use is closed. SUP
rc�uired for longer than 1 year.
Shall meet UDC
parking=Maxi
mum Number of Food Trucks- 3
requirements. Site
plan not required.
�
Permitting- Temporary Use Permit
Enforcement:
Review of
Temporary Use
Amenities- Tables, Chairs, Restrooms,
Permit.
Etc.
Primary Use
• Mobile food vendor(s) that utilize a site that as
the primary use. This may include one mobile
food vendor or developed as food truck park.
Local Examples.- Black Box, Morrow Street
food park
Primary
Use
s
Primary Use Not Required
Zonina 0Istricta. Connection to electric, water and
C-1 and C3 districts, wastewater required
Industrial, Business
Park, Mixed Use
districts Time- Permanent
Site Requirements:.
Maximum Number of Food Trucks -
�,
Site plan required.
based on site requirements
Enforcement:
Review of special
�r Permitting- Special Use Permit
use permit.
Designated park
Amenities- Temporary and Permanent
manager required.
Required.
who do not want to come in for a temporary use permit. Nelson said this will be easier to monitor. Ross
asked about complaint based reports and said he feels that this is overregulating.
Councilmember Jonrowe asked if the transient use applies to the vendor or the business hosting the vendor.
Nelson said the health district and fire permit would apply to the vendor itself. Nelson said food trucks are
permitted through the Williamson County Health District. She explained that a property owner must get the
transient use permit. Nelson said it is necessary to provide predictability. Jonrowe said property owners
providing space to vendors should be required to have a Special Use Permit.
Ross asked if a vendor needs a permit from the County, the City and the Fire Department. Nelson confirmed.
Ross said this seems cumbersome. Nelson said it could be simplified by combining Fire and City, but the
applicant would still need to permit through the Williamson County Health District, as well.
Nelson provided a Summary of Recommendations and asked the City Council if they concur with the UDC
Advisory Committee recommendations for the following.
• Transient Use
• Accessory Use
• Primary Use
Ross asked what category the food trucks at Red Poppy Festival would fall under. Nelson said these
vendors would be under a special event permit.
Jonrowe said she wants the number of vendors limited and would like to see more of a food court concept.
She asked about site plans for lighting, parking, etc. Nelson said a full site plan would be required. Jonrowe
asked about nuisance requirements for smoke and smells and said she wants to know what has been
examined in other cities. Jonrowe said she also wants more outreach with the brick and mortar restaurant
owners in an effort to afford fairness and equity, without favoritism.
Jonrowe warned staff to be careful not to craft policies around already existing businesses. Mayor Ross said
the smell issue in Austin was a BBW vendor cooking many hours all day and night. Ross asked how staff
would outreach to the brick and mortar business owners. Nelson said a general announcement would be
sent out and staff would work with the communications staff to identify stakeholders and create an event to
invite the stakeholders to meet with the UDC Advisory Committee.
Councilmember Gipson said having food vendors is a great thing to do and adds culture. He said that
Councilmember Jonrowe had good comments. He suggested simplifying the process by allowing 7 days per
week. Gipson said the resources from other cities are very important. He noted that food trucks bring a
unique culture to downtown and thanked Nelson for the in depth presentation and information.
Nelson summarized the Council's input.
Councilmember Fought said he agrees that it is necessary to reach out to brick and mortar business owners.
He said he does not want to establish a minimum number of vendors, but rather determine if it is reasonable
to establish a minimum. Fought asked why the City is regulating this and pointed out a danger in regulating
just because you can. He suggested making food vending feasible while still fitting the character of the town.
Councilmember Eby said she agrees with the UDC committee recommendations and also would want more
outreach with stakeholders.
Mayor Ross thanked Nelson and staff who participated in the presentation on behalf of the Council. He said
it was very well done.
C. Presentation and discussion regarding the Downtown West Construction and naming process -- Eric
Johnson, CIP Manager
An update on the Downtown West Construction was provided by the CIP Manager, Eric Johnson. He
described his presentation as a "show and tell" on where the City is with Downtown West.
Mayor Ross asked Johnson if he watches the construction cam every day. Johnson said every single day.
Ross asked Johnson to describe the construction cam. Johnson said there is a construction camera
installed that anyone in the world can look at any time of any day. He explained that the camera takes a
picture every 15 minutes and provides time -lapsed photography for the past 24 hours.
Johnson provided the Background for the Project
• November 17, 2017 — Demo Permit Issued
• November 28, 2017 — Ground Breaking
• December 14, 2017 — Notice to Proceed
• January 10, 2018 — Building Permits Issued
Johnson showed images of City Hall progress and where the City is headed. He provided the same for the
Council Chambers. A time-lapse aerial video of the construction was also provided, courtesy of the
contractor's drone.
Johnson showed the Red Poppy Plaza Shade Project design and said that three of the structures will be in
the courtyard at the Red Poppy Plaza. Johnson noted that the Library Advisory Board and Arts and Culture
Board were very pleased with the project.
He spoke next about the Naming Process
• Downtown West
o Project name, not a location
• Four City Building
o City Hall
o Council Chambers
o Light & Waterworks Building
o Library
• Return to Council in the next several months with an update
Johnson described the Next Steps
• Continue Construction
o Foundation for both buildings in a few weeks
o Structural steel — mid-April
• Additional Contracts to Council — Mid/Late Summer
o Audio visual/furniture/data cabling
• Complete Construction
0 December 2018
Grand Opening
o Early 2019
Councilmember Jonrowe asked if the naming process will be internal. Johnson said the first step will be
internal. Jonrowe said that her constituents do not like the term "downtown". Johnson said he will take note.
D. Presentation and discussion on the Hospice Feasibility Study -- Steve Fought, Councilmember District 4
Councilmember, Steve Fought, provided an update on the Hospice Feasibility Study. He explained that it
was a study to determine if an inpatient residential setting hospice facility was needed in the area. Fought
said, due to the demographics of Georgetown, it seemed natural.
Fought named the financial partners in the study
• Georgetown Health Foundation (St. David's Foundation)
City of Georgetown
Baylor Scott and White
• Austin Hospice (Christopher House)
Fought showed organizations that had been identified for interviews and had been asked to provide
important data for the study.
• Wesleyan (Hospice)
• Autumn Leaves
a The Delaney
■ St. David's Hospital
• Seaton Hospital
• Kindred Hospice
He noted that Seaton Hospital and Kindred Hospice had declined providing data. Fought said a great deal
of Medicare data was incorporated and nothing had been lost, since Medicare data was consistent among
all hospitals.
Fought described the Two Phases of the Study
Demand Assessment
• Implementation
The expectations were discussed, as well
■ There is a strong, unmet demand
• Georgetown is a reasonable center for operations
Fought said he was surprised by the results of the study showing that there was not a demand. He
explained that the results of the study indicate that the demand for a Hospice Care Center (HCCC) in the
central location (I1-1135 and South University) would be approximately 1.4 to 2.1 beds at the General Inpatient
(GIP) level of care with the potential for 2.2 to 2.5 additional beds at Respite or Routine levels of care.
Fought said that it was learned that people want to stay in place. He noted that the area is very physician
centric and people do not want to leave their physicians. Fought said he was surprised by the results, but
there is not enough need to be sustainable.
Fought spoke on the study group's recommendations and explained that Phase 2 will not take place
HOSPICE FEASIBILITY STUDY
RECOMMENDATIONS
Do not proceed with a free-standing option unless there is an ability to
raise a reserve fund large enough to support losses through interest
income.
Consider a location within an existing health care facility:
• Sufficient space to include family and hospice staff areas
• Compliant with Medicare Conditions of Participation licensing and
Life Safety requirements
Maximizes senior population access and minimizes travel time to
area hospitals
Fought provided Next Steps of the study group and said that the study group will reimburse the City Council.
• Close the Books
• Present Summary Findings, etc., to Interested Parties
■ Facilitate Further Discussion
Mayor Ross recessed the meeting to Executive Session under Section 551.071 and Section 551.074 at 5:09
PM.
Executive Session
In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon's Texas Codes, Annotated, the
items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular session.
E. Sec. 551.071: Consultation with Attorney
Advice from attorney about pending or contemplated litigation and other matters on which the attorney has a duty to
advise the City Council, including agenda items
- Foreclosure matter Duvall Estate
Sec. 551:074: Personnel Matters
City Manager, City Attorney, City Secretary and Municipal Judge: Consideration of the appointment, employment,
evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal
- City Secretary Evaluation
Adjournment
Mayor Ross adjourned the meeting at 6:00 PM to begin the Regular City Council Meeting
Approved by the Georgetown City Council on J ka 7 1 6 _
Date
c�
Dale Ross, Mayor Attest: City Se ry