The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11 CIP-compressed FY2016 Annual Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS Children’s Playscape at the Rec Center 211 FY2016 Annual Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS Capital Projects Summary ........................ 213 Downtown Services ................................. 214 Energy Services ........................................ 217 Facilities ................................................... 221 Georgetown Municipal Airport ................ 225 Parks ........................................................ 227 Stormwater Drainage .............................. 230 Transportation ......................................... 233 Water Services Fund ................................ 240 O&M ........................................................ 248 212 FY2016 Annual Budget January •Departmental meetings to prioritize CIP Projects February •Division meetings to coordiante projects March •Develop funding strategy April-May •Present CIP to Boards and City Council September •Council adopts CIP with Annual Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS SUMMARY The City of Georgetown annually updates and adopts a five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) as part of the operating budget adoption process. Generally, the City defines high dollar fixed assets to be capital improvements. On-going maintenance and major repair costs are included as capital expense within the departmental operating budgets. Needed capital improvements are identified through system models, repair and maintenance records, and growth. The CIP is divided into three major categories: the Georgetown Utility System (GUS), Transportation, and General Capital Projects. GUS manages Water/Wastewater Services and Energy Services. Transportation manages Streets, Stormwater Drainage, and the Airport. Finally, General Capital Projects manages Parks, the Downtown Master Plan, Sidewalks, Public Safety, and Facilities. Each of these funds is further dissected in this Capital Projects budget. The timeline for the CIP planning process is outlined below: FISCAL YEAR 2016 Budgeted expenses for FY2016 CIP total $72,906,484. General Capital Projects (GCP) total $35.8 million, and include the first $20 million of bonds from the 2015 Transportation Bond. Additionally, investments in GCP will include San Gabriel Phase 1 and the first debt issuance for Garey Park. Downtown improvements include $675,000 for the Austin Avenue Bridge Design, as well as $125,000 for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance projects. Water Services CIP totals $25.7 million. Water related improvements total $13.2 million, and include upgrades for water mains, pumps, and plant expansions. Wastewater related improvements total $12.5 million, and include upgrades for interceptors and pumps. Electric Services CIP totals $6,098,000, and include improvements for substation improvements and funding for system expansion. The sales tax street maintenance projects total $3.36 million. Rehabilitation projects are schedule at Pine St., Holly St. and 6th @ 7th St. Other CIP improvements include $20,000 for a Master Plan at the Airport and $950,000 related to stormwater system. FY2016 Revenues Electric Revenues 225,000 Grants 275,000 Operating Revenue 22,520,000 Revenue Bonds 10,010,000 Sale of Property 6,705,000 Sales Tax 2,690,625 Self-Supporting COs 2,150,000 Tax-Supported COs 1,737,049 Fund Balance/Transfer 1,629,310 GO Bonds 24,700,000 Downtown TIRZ 264,500 Total Revenues 72,906,484 Expenses Electric 6,098,000 Water 25,757,000 Special Revenue Funds 3,362,000 General Capital Projects 35,881,549 Other 1,807,935 Total Expenses 72,906,484 213 FY2016 Annual Budget DOWNTOWN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS DOWNTOWN CIP DOWNTOWN ELECTRIC DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN DOWNTOWN CIP FUND SUMMARY The FY2016 Downtown CIP includes continuing funding for general repair and maintenance, Americans with Disability Act (ADA) access improvements for sidewalks in the downtown overlay district, and to continue placing utilities underground (funded in the Utility CIP). Additional requests for FY2016 are:  A tree mitigation program to ensure that as trees are removed in the downtown overlay district, they are replaced appropriately;  Recurring funding it extend street lights throughout the overlay district;  Construction of a canopy on the north side courtyard of the library (design completed in 2015).  Implementing the downtown parking study and reconfiguring existing parking resources and signage. The 2016 plan request funds for design work related to pedestrian access and amenities along the Austin Avenue Bridge, with construction to be funded in 2017. DOWNTOWN CIP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN The Downtown Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) implements infrastructure and facilities projects addressed in the Downtown Master Plan adopted by City Council in 2014. The downtown projects incorporate recommendations from the Arts and Culture Board, the Parks and Recreation Board, the Convention and Visitors Bureau Board, the Library Board, the Main Street Board, and the Historic and Architectural Review Commission. The Downtown CIP funding comes from a combination of cash contributions, debt funding, and interest income. Actual amount of debt issues will be determined upon project timing and available and previously unallocated funds (previous year-end excess funds). 214 FY2016 Annual Budget Downtow n Electric* 19% Downtow n Master Plan 81% FY2016 Expenses by Type Certificate s of Obligation 66% Electric Revenues 22%Downtown TIRZ 12% Combined 5-Year Est.Funding DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN CIP FUND SUMMARY Subproject Listings FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Revenues by Source Certificates of Obligation 675,000 2,400,000 2,960,000 270,000 - Electric Revenues 225,000 388,000 275,000 885,000 340,000 Downtown TIRZ 264,500 297,000 197,000 197,000 197,000 Total 1,164,500$ 3,085,000$ 3,432,000$ 1,352,000$ 537,000$ Expenses by Type Downtown Electric*225,000 388,000 275,000 885,000 340,000 Downtown Master Plan 939,500 2,697,000 3,157,000 467,000 197,000 Total 1,164,500$ 3,085,000$ 3,432,000$ 1,352,000$ 537,000$ *Less:Downtown Electric is funded and budgeted in the Electric department capital fund. 215 FY2016 Annual Budget DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total Downtown Electric Proj.300,000 185,000 348,000 235,000 845,000 300,000 2,213,000 Antique Lights 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 240,000 Total 340,000$ 225,000$ 388,000$ 275,000$ 885,000$ 340,000$ 2,453,000$ Project Title: Downtown Electric Project Description:In an effort to expand successful retail opportunities beyond the 9-block core of the square, antique street lights will be installed throughout the overlay district in conjunction with streescape projects. A tree mitigation program is needed to ensure that as trees are removed in the downtown overlay district, they are replaced appropriately.To ensure safety on Austin Ave., the City will install a pedestrian signal at the intersection of Austin Ave. and 5th Street to help protect people as the cross from downtown to restaurants north of the square. To continue to improve the appeal and usability of Downtown, the City will perennially work to move utilities underground. Funding Source: Funded by Electric Operating Revenues and Downtown TIRZ Revenues Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total Red Poppy Canopy - 67,500 - - - - 67,500 General Repair & ADA Maintenance - 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 625,000 Austin Bridge Design 675,000 675,000 Tree Mitigation/Lighting 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 132,000 Signature Gateway - - 100,000 - - - 100,000 Mast Arms - - 560,000 270,000 - 830,000 Reconfigure Parking - 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Austin Bridge Construction / Match / Pedestrian Elements 2,400,000 2,400,000 4,800,000 Total 22,000$ 939,500$ 2,697,000$ 3,157,000$ 467,000$ 197,000$ 7,479,500$ Funding Source: Funded by Tax-Supported Certificates of Obligation Bonds. Project Title: Downtown Master Plan Project Description:Inan effort to create more outdoor seating, funding for designing a canopy on the north side courtyard of the library is being requested. Future plans include installing mast arms at major intersections, developing signature gateway signage. The City expects to utilize TxDot and CAMPO funding for the repair of the Austin Avenue bridges; however, local funding will be needed for ADA access connection to sidewalks and trails and other pedestrian elements. PROJECTS COMPLETED IN FY2015  Grace Heritage Assessment / Design PROJECTS PLANNED FOR FY2016  Underground Electric  Pedestrian Signal  Street Lights  Red Poppy Canopy  Tree Replacement  General Repair & Maintenance  Grace Heritage Church Rehabilitation  ADA Sidewalk Repair  Trailheads/Pedestrian Connectivity to Austin Ave bridges  Signature Gateway LONG-RANGE PROJECTS (5-YEAR CIP PLAN)  Underground Electric  Street Lights  Tree Replacement  General Repair & Maintenance  ADA Sidewalk Repair  Trailheads/Pedestrian Connectivity to Austin Ave bridges  Mast Arms 216 FY2016 Annual Budget ENERGY SERVICES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS GROWTH  Additional residential and commercial developments inside the system’s service area drive the need for Capital Improvement.  Energy demand is projected to grow by about 15% over the next 5 years.  Five-year plan includes expansion of power bank additions at substations, along with other substation support and modifications.  The CIP also includes extensions of overhead and underground feeders to new commercial and residential developments.  System improvements for load and reliability control, as well as service extensions from existing distribution system to service new customers. AGE • CIP includes projects to inspect, and treat or replace deteriorated poles and rehabilitate aging facilities. • In FY2009, the Utility began a long-term project to identify and rehabilitate overhead and underground facilities, system-wide.  The FY2009 rehabilitation project includes a phased conversion of the City’s 12.5vK system to 25vK for reliability. REGULATORY CHANGES • The City is subject to reliability standards of the North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) and operational control and reliability through the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT). • Due to the deregulated electric market in Texas, and the City’s status as a non-opt-in municipal retail provider, the City must continue to monitor developments in the Texas marketplace. • The replacement of the AMR system with an AMI system will support regulatory changes related to Smart-Grid. • The City has a Conservation and Environmental department to focus on conservation within the electric utility, including the provision for capital investment in conservation-related projects. ENERGY SERVICES FUND SUBSTATIONS/ COMMUNICATION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS SOLAR ENERGY SERVICES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN The Energy Services Utility maintains a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to address the community’s need for superior electric service. The CIP is developed by incorporating several factors including service improvement, increased reliability, equipment aging, extension of service within the certificated service area, regulatory changes, competition within dually certified areas, and support for economic development. The City operates and maintains an energy delivery system including seven substations and 394 miles of distribution lines consisting of both 12.5kV and 25kV. In addition to energy delivery, the Energy Services Utility operates the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition system (SCADA), fiber- optic communications network, and the AMR system. These additional systems support, collectively, the electric and water utilities. SUBSTATIONS & DISTRIBUTION LINES 130 135 140 135 139 143 147 152 156 161 125 130 135 140 145 150 155 160 165 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Electric Peak Load Growth 2015-2020 are Projected. All years are Fiscal Years 217 FY2016 Annual Budget Operating Revenue 60% Utility Revenue Debt 40% FY2016 Sources of Funding ENERGY SERVICES CIP FUND SUMMARY Subproject Listings FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Sources of Funding Operating Revenue 2,988,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 Utility Revenue Debt 2,000,000 1,823,000 1,125,000 1,795,000 1,191,000 Total 4,988,000 5,323,000 4,625,000 5,295,000 4,691,000 Expenses by Type Substations / Communication 495,000 950,000 600,000 900,000 1,100,000 System Improvements 1,100,000 1,823,000 535,000 1,245,000 900,000 Operational System Expansion 2,718,000 1,923,000 1,923,000 1,923,000 1,923,000 System Expansion 1,785,000 600,000 1,550,000 1,200,000 750,000 Total 6,098,000 5,296,000 4,608,000 5,268,000 4,673,000 Substations / Communicat ion 8% System Improvemen ts 18% Operational System Expansion 45% System Expansion 29% FY2016 Expenses by Type 218 FY2016 Annual Budget ENERGY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total Substations / Communication 2,453,000 495,000 950,000 600,000 900,000 1,100,000 6,498,000 Total 2,453,000 495,000 950,000 600,000 900,000 1,100,000 6,498,000$ Project Title: Substations / Communication Project Description:The cost associated with these projects are for installation of new or replacing existing power banks. This project also provides for engineering, construction and installation of devices related to operating and maintaining City's electric substation including SCADA upgrades. Funding Source: Funded by utility revenue debt. Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total System Improvements 3,460,000 1,100,000 1,823,000 535,000 1,245,000 900,000 9,063,000 System Expansion - 1,785,000 600,000 1,550,000 1,200,000 750,000 5,885,000 Total 3,460,000 2,885,000 2,423,000 2,085,000 2,445,000 1,650,000 14,948,000$ Project Title: System Improvements & Expansion System Improvements:These projects provide for various system improvements and modifications to theexisting electric system overhead and underground main and branch feeder circuits. Projects include the replacement and modification of facilities, circuit ties for reliability improvements, voltage conversions, conductor replacement or upgrades, capacitor and sectionialization switches for system performance. System Expansion:Theseprojects provide forvarious system expansions of the existing electric system overhead and underground main and branch feeder circuits. Projects include the line extensions to new developments, providing new services to residential, commercial or retail business. Funding Source: Funded by utility revenue debt. Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total Operationsl System Expansion 1,040,000 2,718,000 1,923,000 1,923,000 1,923,000 1,923,000 11,450,000 Total 1,040,000 2,718,000 1,923,000 1,923,000 1,923,000 1,923,000 11,450,000$ Funding Source: Funded by cash fromn Electric Utility. Project Title: Operational System Expansion Project Description:These projects provide for various system expansions of the existing electric system over head and underground main and branch feeder circuits. Projects include the line extensions to new developments providing new service to residences, commercial or retail business. PROJECTS COMPLETED IN FY2015  GE60 feeder re-hab and conversion make ready  Tin Barn Alley  FM 1460 relocation  GB70 feeder re-hab and conversion make ready  9th St OH to UG conversion  East Substation feeder reconfig. and conversion  Feeder tie GT50 & GE60  Mays St feeder extension Part 1  GB90 feeder re-hab and conversion Part 1  Rivery Substation power transformer addition  East Substation power transformer addition PROJECTS PLANNED FOR FY2016  Substations  Communication  Operational/System Expansion LONG-RANGE PROJECTS (5-YEAR CIP PLAN)  System Improvements  System Expansion  Operational System Expansion 219 FY2016 Annual Budget ENERGY SERVICES FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MAP 220 FY2016 Annual Budget FACILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FACILITIES PLAN PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITIES GENERAL FACILITIES DOWNTOWN WEST-CITY CTR FACILITIES CIP FUND SUMMARY The Facilities five-year Capital Improvements Program funding comes from a combination of cash contributions, debt funding and interest income. Actual amount of debt issues will be determined upon project timing and available and previously unallocated funds (previous year-end excess funds). Public Safety: The plan includes several major projects to enhance public safety services and response capability. The Public Safety Operations and Training Center (PSOTC) was completed in early 2015. This facility was funded by general obligation bonds approved by voters in May 2011. A tactical building and range will be considered and added in future years. As the City grows and expands its partnership with Emergency Services District #8 (ESD #8), additional fire stations will be required. Two potential fire stations, one to be funded in partnership with the ESD are included; however, these projects are still early in the planning stages. General Facilities: The Georgetown Municipal Complex (GMC) will undergo a remodel in 2016. This project will renovate the entrance of the building for improved customer care interaction and office space efficiency. Additionally, on-going funding will be dedicated to ensure ADA concerns discovered during the City’s self-assessment are addressed in a timely manner. Finally, the City will update the city –wide facilities master plan in 2016. Downtown West: With the adoption of the Downtown Master Plan, the City is working towards providing citizens with: an expanded outdoor public space for special events and gatherings; indoor public space for meetings and small performances; an outdoor amphitheater; additional public parking; consolidated city facilities; and renewed investment on the west side of downtown. In FY 2016, the City Center Plan calls for renovating the GCAT building and the 1987 library. Once these facilities are renovated, staff will be relocated from the existing municipal court and city hall. The old city hall building and Visitor Center will then be sold. Design work for turning the current municipal court into the Visitor Center, and the festival space will also be completed in 2016. Parking: To help increase the availability of public parking, a parking garage feasibility study was done in FY2015, implementation of the study is to begin in 2016. FACILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN The facilities CIP is calls for developing and/or redeveloping city-owned facilities to accommodate the needs of staff and the public. The major projects outlined in the CIP include completing the Public Safety Training and Operations Center, completing the City Center plan, and ensuring accessibility to all facilties. 221 FY2016 Annual Budget Public Safety Facilities Landfill Transfer Station General Facilities Downtow n West- City Center FY2016 Expenses by Type Sale Proceeds City Owned Facilities 68% Self- Supporting COs 19% Tax- Supported COs 9% ESD 8 3%CVB 1% FY2016 Revenues by Source FACILITIES CIP FUND SUMMARY Subproject Listings FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Sources of Funding Sale Proceeds City Owned Facilities 6,705,000 2,000,000 - - - Self-Supporting COs 1,900,000 5,800,000 - - 2,500,000 Tax-Supported COs 912,049 4,580,692 678,741 2,300,000 10,781,000 ESD 8 250,000 CVB 100,000 400,000 - - - Total 9,867,049$ 12,780,692$ 678,741$ 2,300,000$ 13,281,000$ Expenses by Type Public Safety Facilities 250,000 2,500,000 - 300,000 4,000,000 Landfill Transfer Station 210,000 - - - - General Facilities 2,142,049 5,036,692 478,741 - - Downtown West-City Center 7,265,000 5,244,000 200,000 2,000,000 9,281,000 Total 9,867,049$ 12,780,692$ 678,741$ 2,300,000$ 13,281,000$ 222 FY2016 Annual Budget FACILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total Fire Station 6 ESD - 250,000 2,500,000 - - - 2,750,000 Fire Station 7 Eastside - - - - 300,000 2,500,000 2,800,000 Emergency Warning System &Signaling Software 700,000 - - - - - 700,000 Firing Range at PSTOC - - - - 1,500,000 1,500,000 Total 700,000$ 250,000$ 2,500,000$ -$ 300,000$ 4,000,000$ 7,750,000$ Project Title: Public Safety Facilities Project Description:As the City grows and expands its partnership with Williamson County Emergency Services District #8 (ESD #8), additional fire stations will be required. Two future firestations are in early planning stages. Station #6 will be in thenorthwest service area and will be done in partnership with ESD #8, while the eastside station is projected to begin design in FY2018. Funding Source: Funded by Tax-Supported Certificates of Obligation, grants, and interlocal contributions. NOTE: Fire Station 6 costs to be funded in participation with the ESD #8. Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total GMC Remodel - 1,900,000 - - - - 1,900,000 GMC Expansion - - 3,300,000 - - - 3,300,000 Lake Plant Data Center - - 1,500,000 - - - 1,500,000 ADA Transition Plan - 242,049 236,692 478,741 - - 957,482 Total - 2,142,049 5,036,692 478,741 - - 7,657,482$ Project Title: General Facilities Project Description: GMC Remodel:This project is to remodel theexisting front end offices of theGMC to improve space utilization, functionality, and customer interaction. GMC Expansion:This project includes the construction of a new fleet facility along with offices and/or additional shop space and work bays to accommodate operations. The existing fleet facility will be used for Transportation and additional covered storage. Lake Plant Data Center: This project is for the redundant technology access for plant opertations. Funding Source: Funded by Self-Supporting Certificates of Obligation. PROJECTS COMPLETED IN FY2015  Public Safety Operational & Training Center  Parking Study PROJECTS PLANNED FOR FY2016  Fire Station #6 (ESD)  GMC Remodel  Former PD Renovation  Former Library Renovation  Festival / Public Space  GCAT / Municipal Court Redesign LONG-RANGE PROJECTS (5-YEAR CIP PLAN)  Fire Station #7 Eastside  GMC Expansion  Firing Range at PSOTC  Play Areas  Lake Plant Data Center  Plaza  Amphitheater  Tensile Structures 223 FY2016 Annual Budget Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total Downtown West Phase I - 6,705,000 - - - 9,281,000 15,986,000 Council Chambers / CVB Redesign - 100,000 400,000 - - - 500,000 Former PD Renovation - - - 200,000 2,000,000 - 2,200,000 Festival / Public Space - 460,000 4,844,000 - - - 5,304,000 Total -$ 7,265,000$ 5,244,000$ 200,000$ 2,000,000$ 9,281,000$ 23,990,000 Funding Source: Funded by Certificates of Obligation, CVB funds, and proceeds from the sale of City Facilities. Project Title: Downtown West - City Center Project Description:With the adoption of the Downtown Master Plan, the City is working towards providing citizens with an expanded outdoor public space for special events and gatherings, indoor public space for meetings and small performances,an outdoor amphitheater, additional public parking, consolidated city facilities, and sparking reviewed investment on the west side of downtown. This will also include expanding the audio/visual resources available in the library for the public and renovating Grace Heritage Church. Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total Landfill Transfer Station 210,000 - - - - 210,000$ Total -$ 210,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 210,000$ Project Title: Landfill Transfer Station Project Description:The transfer station and closed landfill are owned by the City and operated through a contract with Texas Disposal Systems. The transfer station is where City customers and otheroutside cities bring theirtrash and recycling forprocessing. Having a City run transfer station helps keep customer rates lower through commodity consolidation and decreased transportation for Funding Source: Funded by previously issued Tax-Supported Certificates of Obligation; possible partnerships. Concept drawing for Downtown West. 224 FY2016 Annual Budget Airport Master Plan 100% FY2016 Expenses by Type GEORGETOWN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Subproject Listings FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Revenues by Source Tax-Supported Cert of Ob - - - - - Operating Revenues 20,000 - - - - Total 20,000 - - - - Expenses by Type Runway 36 Parallel - - - - - Fuel Farm - - - - - Airport Master Plan 20,000 - - - - Total 20,000 - - - - Operating Revenues 100% Combined 5-Year Est. Funding AIRPORT SERVICES AIRPORT MASTER PLAN AIRPORT SERVICES CIP FUND SUMMARY Airport Services has experienced a growth in demand for maintenance and rehabilitation of the City’s runway system. The Airport five year Capital Improvement Program funding comes from a combination of cash contributions and previous year-end excess funds. AIRPORT SERVICES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Airport Services manages, maintains and repairs the City airport. Some of the responsibilities of the Airport department include traffic control, emergency response operations, and hosting special events. Daily responsibilities include inspection of runways for sign repair, pavement management, and removal of sight obstructions. 225 FY2016 Annual Budget AIRPORT SERVICES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total Runway 36 Parallel 770,000 - - - - - 770,000 Fuel Farm 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 Airport Master Plan - 20,000 - - - - 20,000 Total 870,000 20,000 - - - - 890,000$ Project Description:Update to the 2005 Airport Master Plan to reaffirm or amend the Century Plan policies, goals and strategies of the plan to the vision and mission statements of the 2030 Plan, and update the short, intermediate and long term projects / actions related to the continued maintenance and development of the airport. Funding Source: Funded by Airport fund The Master Plan will allow the City to determine future needs at the Airport. It is anticipated, capital improvement projects will increase in the out years following the development and implementation of the Master Plan. PROJECTS COMPLETED IN FY2015  Airport Audit PROJECTS PLANNED FOR FY2016  Airport Master Plan - 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Historic/Projected Airport Capital Project Costs 226 FY2016 Annual Budget PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PARKS CIP FUND SUMMARY Subproject Listings FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Revenues by Source General Obligation Bonds 4,700,000 6,500,000 4,500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 Certificates of Obligation 150,000 220,000 900,000 350,000 3,050,000 Cash 1,000,000 60,000 - - 1,179,000 Internal Service Fund - 35,000 170,000 9,000 290,000 Self-Supporting COs - 150,000 - - - Rivery TIRZ - - - - 395,000 Total 5,850,000$ 6,965,000$ 5,570,000$ 1,359,000$ 6,414,000$ Expenses by Type Park Improvements 150,000 289,000 1,350,000 350,000 4,573,000 2008 Park Bond Imp.5,700,000 6,500,000 3,500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 Park Facilities - 176,000 720,000 9,000 341,000 Total 5,850,000$ 6,965,000$ 5,570,000$ 1,359,000$ 6,414,000$ General Obligation Bonds 70% Certificates of Obligation 18%Cash 8% Internal Service Fund 2% Self- Supporting COs 1% Rivery TIRZ 1% Combined 5-Year Est. Funding Park Improveme nts 3% 2008 Park Bond Imp. 97% FY2016 Expenses by Type PARKS CIP PARK IMPROVEMENTS PARK BOND IMPROVEMENTS PARK FACILITIES PARKS CIP FUND SUMMARY The Parks and Recreation five-year Capital Improvements Program funding comes from a combination of cash contributions, debt funding and interest income. Actual amount of debt issues will be determined upon project timing and available and previously unallocated funds (previous year-end excess funds). Some of the major bond funded projects include purchase of land for a future West Side Park, hike and bike trail expansion, planning and design for Garey Park, as well as master planning and design for improvements to San Gabriel Park. These projects are based on the Parks Master Plan and direction form the Parks Advisory Board and City Council. In addition, Garey Park construction and phase one of San Gabriel Park renovations are scheduled to begin in FY2016. PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN In November 2008, voter authorized $35.5 million in General Obligation bonds for Parks and Recreation projects. The projects and related timings are being evaluated in future years. The City has issued $7.5 million of this debt for Parks and Recreation projects. The Parks and Recreation CIP projects are based on the Parks Master Plan and direction from the Parks Advisory Board and City Council. 227 FY2016 Annual Budget PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total ADA Transition Plan (Parks)- 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 750,000 Bark Park - - - - - 105,000 105,000 Bedford Park - - - - - 55,000 55,000 Berry Creek - - - - - 285,000 285,000 Blue Hole - - - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 Booty's Park - - - - - 260,000 260,000 Chautauqua Park - - - - - 125,000 125,000 Downtown - - - - - 180,000 180,000 Emerald Springs Park - - - - - 42,000 42,000 Geneva Park - - - - - 117,000 117,000 IOOF - - 70,000 - 70,000 Katy Crossing Park - - - - - 132,000 132,000 Kelly Park - - - - - 168,000 168,000 McMaster Park - - 60,000 - 1,179,000 1,239,000 New Park Development - - - 200,000 200,000 400,000 Old Town Park - - - - - 86,000 86,000 Pinnacle Park - - - - - 161,000 161,000 Raintree Park - - - - - 50,000 50,000 Randy Morrow Trail - - - - - 203,000 203,000 River Ridge Pool - - - - - 81,000 81,000 Rivery Park - - 9,000 - - 395,000 404,000 San Jose Park - - - - - 50,000 50,000 South San Gabriel Trail - - - - - 180,000 180,000 Summercrest Park - - - - - 88,000 88,000 University Park - - - - - 105,000 105,000 Williams Pool - - - - - 38,000 38,000 Windridge Park - - - - - 83,000 83,000 Winfred Bonner Trail - - - - - 150,000 150,000 Woodlake Park - - - - - 105,000 105,000 Total -$ 150,000$ 289,000$ 1,350,000$ 350,000$ 4,573,000$ 6,712,000$ Project Title: Park Improvements Project Description: The City is working to complete a comprehensive ADA master plan. Funding Source: Funded by cash, TIRZ Revenue, and Certificates of Obligation. PROJECTS COMPLETED IN FY2015  San Jose Splash Pad  San Gabriel Park Master Plan  Westside Park Master Plan PROJECTS PLANNED FOR FY2016  ADA Transition Plan  San Gabriel Park Improvements  Garey Park LONG-RANGE PROJECTS (5-YEAR CIP PLAN)  Blue Hole Park  Historic Park  Westside Park  McMaster Park  Booty’s Park  New Park Development  Tennis Center Improvements  New Trail Development 228 FY2016 Annual Budget Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total San Gabriel Park Improvements - 2,700,000 2,000,000 - - - 4,700,000 New Trail Development - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 4,000,000 Westside Park - - - - - 500,000 500,000 Garey Park - 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 - - 8,500,000 Historic Park - - 500,000 - - - Total -$ 5,700,000$ 6,500,000$ 3,500,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,500,000$ 18,200,000$ Funding Source: FY2016 projects are funded by voter authorized General Obligation bonds. Future projects will require new debt. Project Title: 2008 Park Bond Improvements Project Description: In 2008, the citizens of Georgetown passed bonds specifically related to Parks Projects identified in the Georgetown Parks, Recreation and Trails Master Plan. This phase of improvements includes renovations to San Gabriel Park and Garey Park. Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total Recreation Center - - 26,000 170,000 9,000 290,000 495,000 Tennis Center Drainage Impv - - - 180,000 - - 180,000 Tennis Center - - - 370,000 - 51,000 421,000 IOOF - - - - - - - Cemetery Columbarium - - 150,000 - - - 150,000 - - - - - - - Total -$ -$ 176,000$ 720,000$ 9,000$ 341,000$ 1,246,000$ Project Title: Park Facilities Project Description: In 2008, the citizens of Georgetown passed bonds specifically related to Parks Projects identified in the Georgetown Parks, Recreation and Trails Master Plan. The P&R board have developed a comprehensive list of all park facilities and equipment needing maintenance and repairs. Funding Source: Funded cash, certificates of obligation, or the internal service fund GAREY PARK SITE PLAN 229 FY2016 Annual Budget STORMWATER DRAINAGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS $1,001,760 $1,165,614 $169,331 $1,496,824 $1,195,437 $950,000 $600,000 $2,768,000 $900,000 $600,000 $- $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Historic/Projected Stormwater Drainage Capital Project Costs STORMWATER DRAINAGE SERVICES CIP FUND SUMMARY The FY2016 Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) includes projects aimed at improving stormwater drainage, erosion control, and the compilation of stormwater assets. The Stormwater department completed the buy-out of eight homes in the Smith Branch area as a mitigation measure against future flood damage. The Stormwater Drainage Utility has been focusing on meeting the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Phase II regulations and requirements regarding stormwater control in municipalities. In 2016, the City expects to continue efforts to meet the forthcoming stormwater control mandates. STORMWATER DRAINAGE SVCS CURB & GUTTER REPLACEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADES FLOOD STUDY SERENADA CULVERT IMP. NV BLVD DRAINAGE AIRPORT RD @ PECAN BRANCH STORMWATER DRAINAGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN The Stormwater Drainage Utility manages and maintains stormwater infrastructure operations and facilities. Daily responsibilities include drainage and flood control when needed, right-of-way mowing and cleaning, street sign maintenance and street cleaning operations. 230 FY2016 Annual Budget STORMWATER DRAINAGE CIP FUND SUMMARY The City will be determining a source of revenue to fund the EPA Phase II regulations, the Regional Stormwater Plan, and other requirements regarding stormwater control within municipalities. The most likely revenue source is through a combination of stormwater fees and developer fees paid in-lieu of onsite detention. FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Revenues by Source Operating Revenue 675,000 600,000 600,000 900,000 600,000 Self Supporting CO's - - 2,168,000 - - Grants 275,000 - - - - Total 950,000 600,000 2,768,000 900,000 600,000 Expenses by Type Curb & Gutter Replacement & Main Street Drainage 400,000 500,000 500,000 800,000 500,000 Infrastructure Upgrades 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Smith Branch Buy-outs - - - - - Flood Study 450,000 - - - - Serenada Culvert Imp.- - 500,000 - - NW Blvd Drainage - - 350,000 - - Airport Rd @ Pecan Branch - - 1,300,000 - - Debt Issuance Cost - - 18,000 - - Total 950,000 600,000 2,768,000 900,000 600,000 Operating Revenue 58% Self Supporting CO's 37% Grants 5% Combined 5-Year Est. Funding Curb & Gutter Replaceme nt 43% Infrastructu re Upgrades 11% Flood Study 47% FY2016 Expenses by Type 231 FY2016 Annual Budget STORMWATER DRAINAGE SERVICES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total Curb & Gutter Replacement & Main Street Drainage*300,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 800,000 500,000 3,100,000 Infrastructure Upgrades**100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Smith Branch Buy-outs *** 2,215,000 - - - - - 2,215,000 Flood Study****400,000 550,000 - - - - 950,000 Serenada Culvert Imp.- - - 500,000 - - 500,000 NW Blvd Drainage - - - 350,000 - - 350,000 Airport Rd @ Pecan Branch - - - 1,300,000 - - 1,300,000 Total 3,015,000 1,150,000 600,000 2,750,000 900,000 600,000 9,015,000$ Project Title: Miscellaneous Stormwater Drainage Projects Project Description: *Curb and Gutter Replacements &Main Street Drainage:This project will consist of replacing deteriorating stand-up curbs with curb and gutter. Stand-up curbs throughout the City will be evaluated on their condition and their potential to cause damage to roadways. The curbs identified in areas with the poorest drainage are most likely to contribute to road drainage. These curbs will be targeted for replacement. These replacements will save the City from Having to perform much more costly street rehabilitation. **Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrades:Rehabilitation of ponds above and beyond monthly mowing and trash or debris removal. Examples may include dredging of ditches, stormwater boxes or water quality/detention ponds; construction of end treatments, fencing and alterations of existing storm drain features; and removal of filtration devices. ****Flood Study:Staff has applied for a Texas Water Development Board grant to study the North and South Forks of the San Gabriel River. If approved, this will be in partnership with the Cities of Leander and Liberty Hill and with the Counties of Williamson and Burnett. The grant is a 50/50 share. The State would reimburse $275K and the City would be responsible for the remainder (including in-kind contributions). North and South Fork. Funding Source: Funded by cash from Drainage Utility. *** Funded by self-supporting CO debt. PROJECTS COMPLETED IN FY2015  Smith Branch Buyouts  Annual Curb Replacement PROJECTS PLANNED FOR FY2016  Curb & Gutter Replacement  Infrastructure Upgrades  Flood Study LONG-RANGE PROJECTS (5-YEAR CIP PLAN)  Serenada Culvert Improvements  Northwest Blvd Drainage  Airport Road at Pecan Branch 232 FY2016 Annual Budget TRANSPORTATION SERVICES CAPITAL PROJECTS TRANSPORTATION SERVICES STREETS REHABILITATION ARTERIALS REJUVENATE CHIP SEAL CUTLER PROCESS TRANSPORTATION IMP. PLAN STREET MAINTENANCE SALES TAX  November 2002 voter approved quarter-cent sales tax increase, effective April 1, 2003.  Proceeds can only be used for maintenance of streets existing at the time of election; these monies cannot be used for new construction.  Revenue from this sales tax equates to approximately $2 million per year.  Tax was reauthorized by voters in November 2014.  Tax will go back to voter for reauthorization again in November 2018. GEORGETOWN TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT CORPORATION (GTEC)  In May 2001, voters approved a 4B half-cent sales tax for transportation improvements that provides economic benefit to the community.  GTEC approves projects funded through this sales tax. OVERALL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN  Guides the City’s growth and development.  Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB) recommends potential projects to GTEC.  GTEC approves its annual Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP), which includes projects identified in the City’s Overall Transportation Plan (OTP) that meet GTEC eligibility.  GTEC budget is approved by City Council (not included in this document).  OTP is reviewed by GTAB which makes recommendations to City Council.  In November 2008, voters authorized $46 million in General Obligation debt to be issued for road improvements. 2008 VOTER APPROVED TRANSPORTATION BOND ISSUE  FM 1460 widening from Quail Valley Drive to University Boulevard o City works with TxDOT, Williamson County and the City of Round Rock to Secure outside funding to supplement the bond proposal to complete the Right-of-Way (ROW) acquisition o Widening rural FM 1460 from two lanes to the four lane arterial with adequate ROW for the ultimate six lanes o Project design is complete and let for construction by TxDOT o Construction to start early 2015, after utilities have been relocated  FM 971 improvements at the intersection of North Austin Avenue o Designed to improve access and mobility around the site o Design is nearing completion o Environmental clearances are being sought to make the project ready for construction bidding TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Transportation Services manages, maintains, and repairs City streets and right-of-way. Responsibilities of the Street Department include traffic control, emergency response operations, special events, and assistance in code enforcement. Daily responsibilities include inspection of roadways for sign repair, pavement management and removal of sight obstructions. Transportation Services has experienced a growth in demand for maintenance and rehabilitation of the City’s roadway system. The Street Department Capital Improvement Budget includes maintenance and rehabilitation of the City’s roadway system and support of new transportation construction projects. Funding for maintenance and rehabilitation comes from the City’s General Fund and is $875,000 annually. 239 249 259 269 279 295 300 305 310 315 - 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 FY 2 0 0 6 FY 2 0 0 7 FY 2 0 0 8 FY 2 0 0 9 FY 2 0 1 0 FY 2 0 1 1 FY 2 0 1 2 FY 2 0 1 3 FY 2 0 1 4 FY 2 0 1 5 Cumulative Center Line Miles 233 FY2016 Annual Budget 2015 VOTER APPROVED TRANSPORTATION BOND ISSUE  Goals of the Bond o Reduce traffic on Williams Dr. and improve circulation in the gateway area. o Reduce traffic on SH 29. o Repair sidewalk ADA and safety issues. o Reduce congestion and improve traffic flow on Leander Rd. o Improve intersection management. o Improve accessibility to GISD facilities from Austin Ave. and FM 971. o Improve safety and access from SH 29 to Sam Houston Ave. o Improve capacity and safety of eastern SH 29. HISTORIC DOWNTOWN  Several rehabilitation projects have focused on the Historic Downtown Square Area  Efforts continue to maintain and rehabilitate Historic Georgetown and keep pace with the growing community GASB 34 – MODIFIED APPROACH The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement Number 34 allows for an alternative to depreciation expense for certain infrastructure, termed the Modified Approach. The following conditions must be met: o The government manages the eligible assets using an asset management system to:  Keep an up-to-date asset inventory,  Perform condition assessments and report the results on a measurement scale, and  Estimate the annual amount to maintain and preserve the eligible infrastructure assets at the condition level established and disclosed by the government o The government must document that the eligible assets are being preserved approximately at or above the condition level established and disclosed by the government.  The City implemented is pavement management information system in February 2005  Initial assessment rated Georgetown’s street condition as “good” with a 90 Pavement Condition Index (PCI)  Council has directed staff to incorporate a policy to maintain a minimum average PCI of 85  Current funding should adequately fund that level of PCI, within Georgetown, for the near future  PCI for FY2011 was 87.7  Growth factors could impact that condition over time  System will be closely monitored and reviewed, in detail, in late 2017 234 FY2016 Annual Budget Street Rehab 2% Rejuvenate 2% Chip Seal 7% Cutler Process 3% Point Repair 2% Road Bond Projects 84% FY2016 Expenses by Type Street Maintenan ce Sales Tax 18% General Obligation Bonds 76% General Fund 6% Combined 5-Year Est. Funding TRANSPORTATION SERVICES CIP The capital budget includes major rehabilitation of the City’s roadway systems. In November 2002, voters first approved a quarter cent sales tax for maintenance of existing City streets. This sales tax revenue provides the majority of funding for street rehabilitation projects. The quarter cent sales tax must be reauthorized by the voters every four years. It will need to be reauthorized in November 2018. FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Revenues by Source Street Maintenance Sales Tax 2,800,000 2,400,000 2,500,000 2,700,000 2,800,000 General Obligation Bonds 20,000,000 1,128,000 11,202,000 11,084,000 11,108,000 Previously Issued Bonds - - - - General Fund 875,000 875,000 875,000 875,000 875,000 Total 23,675,000 4,403,000 14,577,000 14,659,000 14,783,000 Expenses by Type Street Rehab 549,000 856,000 875,000 675,000 - Arterials - 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 Rejuvenate 350,000 400,000 500,000 500,000 600,000 Chip Seal 1,620,000 400,000 400,000 500,000 500,000 Cutler Process 740,000 819,000 900,000 1,100,000 1,775,000 Point Repair 416,000 300,000 200,000 300,000 300,000 Road Bond Projects 20,000,000 1,111,000 11,184,000 11,068,000 11,091,000 Debt Issuance Cost - 17,000 18,000 16,000 17,000 Total 23,675,000 4,403,000 14,577,000 14,659,000 14,783,000 235 FY2016 Annual Budget TRANSPORTATION SERVICES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total 11th St: Main St-Rock St - 23,000 128,000 - - - 151,000 8th St: Church St-Myrtle St - 43,000 - - - - 43,000 Austin Ave: 8th St- University Ave - 14,000 78,000 - - - 92,000 Ph1 Signal and Curb Improvementss - 506,000 - 253,000 102,000 - 861,000 7th St - 56,000 - - - - 56,000 10th St: Main St-Rock St - 14,000 80,000 - - - 94,000 8th St: Austin Ave-MLK Dr - 15,000 84,000 - - - 99,000 Church St: 8th St-9th St - 123,000 - - - - 123,000 Access to Governement Svcs - 200,000 - - - - 200,000 Other Sidewalks as Determined - - 741,000 931,000 966,000 1,091,000 3,729,000 Other Road Bond Projects*19,006,000 - 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 49,006,000 Total - 20,000,000 1,111,000 11,184,000 11,068,000 11,091,000 54,454,000$ * This includes the SW Bypass Funding Source: Funded by Transportation Bonds. Project Title: Road Bond Projects Project Description:In 2014,the City completed a review of the pedestrian network within the right of way in the City limits,as well as a comprehensive accessibility review in the downtown district. The study evaluated the condition, presence of pedestrian infrastructure and need as defined by public input, staff recommendations and legal requirements. The study recommends $10 million in improvements to the network including $3.6 million in the downtown district. Recommended improvements support the City's adopted ADA Transition Plan, the Downtown Master Plan, the Parks & Rec Trails Master Plan, the Overall Transportation Plan and the City's Comprehensive Plan. Transportation Services has worked to ensure pedestrian improvements are coupled with street and utility improvements to maximize the City's investment. PROJECTS COMPLETED IN FY2015  9th Street  Cutler  Chip Seal PROJECTS PLANNED FOR FY2016  Specific Street Rehabilitation o Stadium CR152 o N Myrtle Street o N Church Street o CR110 o Katherine Street o 17th Street o Main Street o N Main Street  Arterials  Rejuvenate  Chip Seal  Cutler Process  Sidewalks LONG-RANGE PROJECTS (5-YEAR CIP PLAN)  Specific Street Rehabilitation o N Myrtle Street o N Church Street o CR110 o Katherine Street o 17th Street o Main Street o N Main Street  Arterials  Rejuvenate  Chip Seal  Cutler Process  2015 Transportation Bond Phase 1 236 FY2016 Annual Budget Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total Pine St & Holly St Rehab - 509,000 - - - - 509,000 6th St @ 7th St Imp - 40,000 175,000 - - - 215,000 W 11th St - - 416,000 - - - 416,000 W. 10th St - - 90,000 - - - 90,000 17th St - - 75,000 350,000 - - 425,000 Katherine St - - 50,000 200,000 - - 250,000 Hart St - - 50,000 250,000 - - 300,000 Main St - - - 75,000 225,000 - 300,000 East St Stabilization - - - - 450,000 - 450,000 Arterials *575,000 - 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,575,000$ Rejuvenate **501,000 350,000 400,000 500,000 500,000 600,000 2,851,000$ Chip Seal ***378,000 1,620,000 400,000 400,000 500,000 500,000 3,798,000$ Cutler Process ****1,171,000 414,000 800,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 5,085,000$ Point Repair*****- 742,000 319,000 200,000 500,000 1,175,000 2,936,000$ -$ Total 2,625,000 3,675,000 3,275,000 3,375,000 3,575,000 3,675,000 20,200,000 Project Title: Street Rehabilitation Project Description:Streets listed as subprojects under "Rehabilitation" were identified as being in most need of repair or rehabilitation because of their asphalt and subgrade failures, drainage problems and deteriorating curbs. Subgrade stabilization, valley gutter installation and curb and gutter addition or replacement are combined with surface treatments to bring the pavement condition back into the high 90's. * Arterials: Arterials are a higher classification of roadway from residential and collector streets. Arterials are usually built to a higher standard to accommodate a high volume of residential and truck traffic. The heavy vehicles and high volumes on these roads can cause an exponential rate of deterioration when pavement scores begin to fall below acceptable levels. A higher priority is placed on this classification when evaluating scores for the funds to be spent here for treatment and maintenance. **Rejuvenate: Application of asphalt pavement to provide ultraviolet protection and seal minute cracks and pavement flaws. Restores a uniform dark asphalt color to pavement covering the squeegee lines left after crack sealing. This process, applied to pavement in moderately good condition, can prolong the need for more costly applications. Current year's proposed areas include: River Ridge Dr, Berry Creek Dr, Quail Valley Dr, NE downtown, Western Trail, and Sun City. ***Chip Seal: Oil and rock maintenance application to provide a seal and wear protection, sealing current cracks and making a self healing barrier for new cracks. Current year's areas are expected to include: River Ridge Dr, Inner Loop (Churchhill Farms),DB Wood Rd (Public Safety Operational and Training Center to Georgetown Village), Williams Dr (DB Wood to Del Webb),NE downtown, North Georgetown Addition, Lakeway Dr, and Serenada Dr (Luna Trail area). ****Cutler Process: Streets listed as subprojects under "Maintenance" were identified as being in most need of surface treatments with only minor repairs to roadways. Roadways are eveluated by history, condition, age and type of previous treatments performed. Current year's projects are expected to include: Maple St, Myrtle St, and Church St (University Ave to 2nd St) *****Point Repair: Pavement has normally reached the end of its life and possibly has at least one overlay. Pavement need to be milled down to or below original flow line. Grade point repairs will be made and then resurfaced with a one and one half inch overlay of exisiting asphalt. This should extedn the pavement's life an additional 10 to 15 years. Current year's areas for thin overlay are expected to include: Texas Dr, Gabriel View Dr, Kathi Ln, Addie Ln, Brandi Ln, and Tiffany Ln.Funding Source: Funded by General Fund and Street Maintenance Sales Tax. 237 FY2016 Annual Budget TRANSPORTATION SERVICES FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MAP 238 FY2016 Annual Budget SIDEWALK CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MAP 239 FY2016 Annual Budget WATER SERVICES FUND WATER SERVICES FUND WATER SERVICES WATER MAINS PUMP & STORAGE UPGRADES WATER SERVICES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Georgetown Utility Systems Water Services Utility maintains a Captial Improvement Program (CIP) to address the community’s need for superior water, wastewater, and irrigation service. This CIP is determined by many factors including on-going annexation, service improvement, the rehabilitation of aging water and wastewater infrastructure, and the need to meet changing state and federal requirements. The City operates three water treatment plants and five wastewater treatment plants. Water Services retains ownership of these plants and contracts for their operation. The City’s current utilization of its water supply is 35% ground water and 65% surface water. WASTEWATER SERVICES WASTEWATER INTERCEPTORS PUMPING UPGRADES PLANT UPGRADES HOW MUCH WATER DO WE TREAT? GROWTH  Population growth drives the need for Capital Improvement.  Water demand is projected to grow by about 15% over the next 5 years.  Five-year plan includes expansion of water treatment system capacity to meet peak demand.  Wastewater flow is expected to grow about 18% over the next 5 years.  City staff continues to look for ways to improve the current infrastructure, thus, delaying plant expansions whenever possible. AGE • One of the fastest growing issues facing Water Services is the replacement of older water and wastewater system mains.  Early infrastructure has exceeded its useful life and requires extensive repair or replacement to continue the delivery of reliable service. • Wastewater improvements being recommended continue the rehabilitation of sanitary sewer mains that may be experiencing inflow and infiltration throughout the City. • An aggressive sanitary sewer main improvement program eliminates the potential for Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSO) and allows for the delivery of reliable wastewater service to the community. REGULATORY CHANGES • The City of Georgetown is subject to requirements of the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone (EARZ) because 98% of the City is over the EARZ. • The regulatory requirements of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) require testing at least 20% of the collection system every year, thus testing the whole system every 5 years. • Testing is included in the Wastewater CIP. • Once problems are identified, the City has 12 months to make repairs. • A significant portion of the capital budget for the Wastewater Utility is dedicated to inspection and repair of existing mains. - 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 FY 2 0 1 1 FY 2 0 1 2 FY 2 0 1 3 FY 2 0 1 4 FY 2 0 1 5 *F Y 2 0 1 6 *F Y 2 0 1 7 *F Y 2 0 1 8 *F Y 2 0 1 9 *F Y 2 0 2 0 Water Services Treatment Water Wastewater * Projected* Projected 240 FY2016 Annual Budget WATER SERVICES FUND OVERVIEW The City’s five year Capital Improvement Program funding comes from a combination of cash, debt funding, and impact fees. Actual amount of debt issues will be determined upon each individual year’s consideration of actual resources available, coverage requirement and other considerations. In 2010, the City updated its impact fees. The maximum fees are $4,714 for water and $1,694 for wastewater, and $5,240 for wastewater in South Fork basin. The City Council set the current fees at $3,511 for water and $1,694 for wastewater and $2,927 for wastewater in the South Fork basin. Impact fees will be reviewed as part of the FY2016 budget process. WATER SERVICES CIP FUND SUMMARY FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Revenues by Source Operating Revenue 17,747,000 24,924,000 12,396,000 16,945,000 21,252,000 Utility Revenue Bonds 8,010,000 - 16,426,000 21,826,000 13,848,000 Impact Fees - - - - - Interest & Other - - - - - Total 25,757,000$ 24,924,000$ 28,822,000$ 38,771,000$ 35,100,000$ Expenses by Type Water Water Mains 5,602,000 1,738,000 1,087,000 3,882,000 - Pump & Storage Upgrades 335,000 7,299,000 5,697,000 480,000 3,230,000 Plant Upgrades & Expanson - 20,000 3,712,000 11,875,000 11,875,000 Rural Water Water Mains 5,294,000 4,296,000 4,051,000 4,842,000 250,000 Pump & Storage Upgrades 2,007,000 - - - - Wastewater Wastewater Interceptors 11,951,000 4,344,000 5,369,000 6,461,000 7,476,000 Pumping Upgrades 568,000 2,019,000 2,908,000 3,799,000 4,957,000 Plant Upgrades - 5,208,000 5,752,000 7,104,000 7,104,000 Debt Issuance Cost - - 246,000 328,000 208,000 Total 25,757,000$ 24,924,000$ 28,822,000$ 38,771,000$ 35,100,000$ Operating Revenue 69% Utility Revenue Bonds 31% FY2016 Revenues by Source Water Mains 22% Pump & Storage Upgrades 1% Water Mains 21% Pump & Storage Upgrades 8% Wastewater Interceptors 46% Pumping Upgrades 2% Debt Issuance Cost 0% FY2016 Expenses by Type - 10,000,000 20,000,000 30,000,000 40,000,000 50,000,000 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Water Capital Project Costs Water Wastewater Rural Water 241 FY2016 Annual Budget WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total Water-Street Rehab 247,000 846,000 330,000 - - - 1,423,000$ Shell Road Water (H-3)1,665,000 4,756,000 - - - - 6,421,000$ West Loop (H-1B) Ph1: Innerspace to Th. Oaks - - 1,408,000 - - - 1,408,000$ FM 1460 to Maple Water (H-2)- - - 357,000 915,000 - 1,272,000$ Rabbit Hill Water (RH-1)- - - 730,000 2,071,000 - 2,801,000$ West University Ave.- - - - 896,000 - 896,000$ Total 1,912,000$ 5,602,000$ 1,738,000$ 1,087,000$ 3,882,000$ -$ 14,221,000$ Project Description: Project entails replacement of water lines in the service are to improve firefighting capabilities and eliminate aged, undersized lines. Replacement of lines is coordinated with the Street Department CIP program to replace water lines prior to or during street rehabilitation to minimize the impact of maintenance on upgraded streets. Funding Source: Funded by cash from operations. Project Title: Water Mains PROJECTS COMPLETED IN FY2015  Utility Master Plan  Tin Barn Alley  6th St Main to Austin Ave  2nd St Main to Austin Ave  Property Acquisition for FM 1460 PROJECTS PLANNED FOR FY2016  Water-Street Rehab  Shell Road Water  Park WTP Pump Station LONG-RANGE PROJECTS (5-YEAR CIP PLAN)  FM 1460 to Maple Water  Rabbit Hill Water (RH-1)  West University Avenue  Park WTP Pump Station  Park WTP Raw Pump Station  Tank Rehabilitation  Park WTP Clearwell  Treatment Plant Expansion 242 FY2016 Annual Budget Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total Rabbit Hill EST 1,713,000 - - - - - 1,713,000$ Park WTP Pump Station Exp - 335,000 5,931,000 - - - 6,266,000$ Park WTP Raw Pump Station - - 888,000 5,397,000 - - 6,285,000$ Sun City Elevated Storage Tank - - - - - 2,750,000 2,750,000$ Tank Rehabilitation - - 480,000 300,000 480,000 480,000 1,740,000$ Total 1,713,000$ 335,000$ 7,299,000$ 5,697,000$ 480,000$ 3,230,000$ 18,754,000$ Project Description:Elevated & Ground Storage Tank, along with pump station expansions will be constructed to meet current and future system demand. Projects consist of the Park Water Treatment Plant high service pump station improvements. This plant improvement is scheduled for removal because of a regulatory issue. Funding Source: Funded by cash from operations. Project Title: Pump and Storage Upgrades Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total Park WTP Plant Clearwell - - 20,000 150,000 - - 170,000$ Treatment Plant Expansion - - - 3,562,000 11,875,000 11,875,000 27,312,000$ Total -$ -$ 20,000$ 3,712,000$ 11,875,000 11,875,000 27,482,000$ Project Title: Water Treatment Plant Upgrades & Expansion Project Description:This project accounts for the expansion of the existing plants to meet present and future needs of the City. The construction of two additional settling basins, 5 filters, completion of the dewatering facilities, and replacement of the existing intake pumps will add greater capacity to meet the peak irrigation demands of the summer months. Funding Source: Funded by cash from operation and developer contributions. 243 FY2016 Annual Budget LONG-RANGE PROJECTS (5-YEAR CIP PLAN)  CR 258 (WD 14-3)  SH 138 (Hoover-2)  CR 248 (WD 14-4)  CR 147 (WD 14-1)  Miscellaneous Line Extensions RURAL WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total Miscellaneous Line Ext.- 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,250,000$ Pastor GST Line Upgrade (H-1a14)- 445,000 - - - - 445,000$ CR 200 Line Improvements (CO-1)- 1,186,000 - - - - 1,186,000$ CR 255 (WD 14 - 2)- 3,413,000 2,062,000 - - - 5,475,000$ CR 258 (WD 14 - 3)- - 1,984,000 1,831,000 - - 3,815,000$ SH 138 (Hoover - 2)- - - 748,000 1,922,000 - 2,670,000$ CR 248 (WD 14 - 4)642,000 1,403,000 - 2,045,000$ CR 147 (WD 14 - 1)580,000 1,267,000 - 1,847,000$ Total -$ 5,294,000$ 4,296,000$ 4,051,000$ 4,842,000$ 250,000$ 18,733,000$ Project Title: Water Mains - Western District Funding Source: Funded by cash from operations and by utility revenue debt. Project Description:Project include theaddition of new watermains and upsizing of existing water mains to improve service and meet demand for existing and future growth in the Western District. Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total Domel Pump Station Improvements - 2,007,000 - - - - 2,007,000$ -$ Total -$ 2,007,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,007,000$ Funding Source: Funded by cash from operations and utility revenue debt. Project Title: Pump and Storage Upgrades Project Description:Project includes therehabilitation of existing pump stations to meet thedemands of existing customers and future growth in the Western District. PROJECTS COMPLETED IN FY2015  COG Merger with Chisholm Trail SUD  Utility Master Plan  FM 1869 & SH 183 Waterline Relocate PROJECTS PLANNED FOR FY2016  Miscellaneous Line Extensions  Pastor GST Line Upgrade (H-1a14)  CR200 Line Improvements (CO-1)  CR 255 (WD 14-2)  CR 258 (WD 14-3)  Domel Pump Station Improvements 244 FY2016 Annual Budget LONG-RANGE PROJECTS (5-YEAR CIP PLAN)  EARZ  Berry Creek Interceptor (BCI-3)  San Gabriel Interceptor (SGI-2)  Lift Station Upgrades  Westinghouse Lift Station & Force Main (rebuild)  Berry Creek Lift Station & Force Main (BCI-LS)  Interceptor Lift Station Decommission (Int-LS)  San Gabriel Belt Press  Pecan Branch WWTP Expansion  Northlands WWTP WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total Wastewater-Street Projects - 200,000 136,000 - - - 336,000$ EARZ - 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 8,000,000$ Berry Creek Interceptor (BCI-4)- 1,489,000 - - - - 1,489,000$ Berry Creek Interceptor (BCI-5)- 1,533,000 - - - - 1,533,000$ Berry Creek Interceptor (BCI-6)- 4,272,000 - - - - 4,272,000$ Pecan Branch Interceptor - 1,957,000 - - - - 1,957,000$ Berry Creek Interceptor (BCI-3)- - 2,208,000 3,869,000 3,869,000 - 9,946,000$ San Gabriel Interceptor (SGI-2)- - - - 1,592,000 6,476,000 8,068,000$ Total -$ 11,951,000 4,344,000$ 5,369,000$ 6,461,000$ 7,476,000$ 35,601,000$ Funding Source: Funded by cash from operations and by utility revenue debt. Project Title: Wastewater Interceptors Project Description:Project entails replacement of wastewaterlines in the service area to improve flow, add new service, add capacity, and eliminate aged and undersized lines to comply with Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone requirements. Replacement of lines is coordinated with the Street Department CIP program to replace wastewater lines prior to or during street rehabilitation to minimize the impact of maintenance on upgraded streets. Also, projects include system expansion to promote operational efficiencies and economic growth. Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total Lift Station Upgrades - 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,250,000$ Westinghouse Lift Station & Force Main (Rebuild)- 318,000 850,000 - - - 1,168,000$ Berry Creek Lift Station & Force Main (BCI-LS)- - 919,000 2,658,000 2,658,000 - 6,235,000$ Interceptor Lift Station Decommission (Int-LS)- - - - 891,000 4,707,000 5,598,000$ Total -$ 568,000$ 2,019,000$ 2,908,000$ 3,799,000$ 4,957,000$ 14,251,000$ Project Title: Pumping Upgrades Project Description:Project is a multi-year project to upgrade or decommission the City's lift stations (LS). Included are control panel upgrades, SCADA and fiber upgrades, pump upgrades, emergency diesel installation, installation of safety grates, etc. Funding Source: Funded by cash from operations. PROJECTS COMPLETED IN FY2015  Utility Master Plan  EARZ 2013-2014  Public Training Facility off-site WW  Property Acquisition for Snead Dr WW  Property Acquisition for FM 1460  Tin Barn Alley PROJECTS PLANNED FOR FY2016  Wastewater-Street Projects  EARZ  Berry Creek Interceptor (BCI-4, BCI-5, and BCI-6)  Pecan Branch WWTP Interceptor  Lift Station Upgrades  Westinghouse Lift Station & Force Main (rebuild) 245 FY2016 Annual Budget Subproject Listings Project to Date FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Total San Gabriel Belt Press - - 1,587,000 - - - 1,587,000$ Pecan Branch WWTP Expansion - - 3,621,000 3,621,000 - - 7,242,000$ Northlands WWTP - - - 2,131,000 7,104,000 7,104,000 16,339,000$ Total -$ -$ 5,208,000$ 5,752,000$ 7,104,000$ 7,104,000$ 25,168,000$ Funding Source: Funded by utility system revenue bonds. Project Title: Plant Upgrades Project Description: San Gabriel Belt Press: this project is the installation of a 2-meter belt press for sludge dewatering. Branch Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP):will be expanded by 1.5MG to meet the compliance of the current capacity and future growth. Future projects consist of other capacity improvements and /or the new Northlands WWTP. 246 FY2016 Annual Budget WATER SERVICES FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MAP 247 FY2016 Annual Budget ONGOING OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE COSTS Capital improvement projects can affect on-going operations and maintenance of assets, either positively or negatively. Staff, in an effort to anticipate changes in on-going costs, has developed an O&M schedule to properly anticipate these changes. When certain types of capital projects are developed and completed, they have ongoing financial impacts upon the City’s operating budgets. These impacts may be in the form of personnel costs or operating costs, such as maintenance, supplies, electricity, fuel, janitorial services, or new program costs. Conversely, replacement capital projects may reduce the operating impact on the City's current or future budgets if they are improving efficiencies of an existing asset. Projected O&M impacts, by fund, over the next five years. FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 O&M Impacts by Type Airport - - - - - Downtown - - - - - Energy Services (260,000) (260,000) (260,000) (260,000) (260,000) Facilities - 60,000 110,000 110,000 170,000 Parks - - 400,000 420,000 420,000 Stormwater - - 10,000 10,000 10,000 Transportation - - - - - Water Services (200,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) Total Impact (460,000)$ (1,200,000)$ (740,000)$ (720,000)$ (660,000)$ Airport: Currently, staff is redeveloping the Airport’s master plan. In this fiscal year, there are no anticipated O&M impacts related to capital projects. This projection will adjust as the master plan and capital improvement plan for the airport are refined. Downtown: All proposed projects in the downtown area will be maintained and operated using existing resources. Energy Service: The installation and completion of proposed system improvements energy service deliver, including substation and communication upgrades, modifications to facilities and circuit ties, and the expansion of the system to new developments is anticipated to result in a savings of $260,000 annually. Facilities: The maintenance required for new facilities in FY2017, including the Lake Plant Data Center, the remodel of the Georgetown Municipal Complex, and the park space in Downtown West will result in $60,000 of on-going needs. In FY2018, Fire Station 6 will require $50,000 of annual maintenance. Finally, in FY2020 an additional $60,000 will be needed to maintain Fire Station 7 and a new firing range at the Public Safety Training and Operations Center. Parks: Garey Park is anticipated to be open in FY2018. O&M for the park is $400,000. This is in addition to entrance and rentals fees that will be collected, which will offset some costs. Additionally, new trails will be added and open in FY2019, requiring $20,000 of on-going maintenance. Stormwater: With the completion of the Airport Road improvements, as well as other drainage improvements identified in the capital improvement plan, beginning in FY2018 there will be a need for an additional $10,000 annually for curb and gutter maintenance. Transportation: On-going and increased transportation operations and maintenance needs are covered by a dedicated street maintenance sales tax. It is anticipated that as Georgetown develops and collects additional sales tax that the increased demands for maintenance will be covered by the ¼ cent sales tax allocation. Water Services: In FY2016, the City approved moving water and wastewater treatment operations in-house. This operations shift is anticipated to save the City $200,000 in the first year, and $1 million each year until FY2020. 248