The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutGTAB2016 C ITY OF G EORGETOWN, TEXAS C APITAL I MPROVEMENT P LAN S TREETS/DRAINAGE/AIRPORT F ISCAL Y EAR 2016 Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board April 10, 2015 DR A F T Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 Transportation Division Streets Introduction .......................................................................................... 2 Streets Projects ................................................................................... 5 Stormwater Introduction ........................................................................................ 13 Stormwater Projects .......................................................................... 15 Airport Introduction……………………………………………………………….. 18 Airport Projects……………………………………………………….…... 19 DR A F T Capital Improvement Plan The City of Georgetown annually updates and adopts a five-year Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) Schedule as part of the operating budget adoption process. Needed capital improvements are identified through system models, repair and maintenance records, and growth. The City uses a team approach to prioritizing capital improvement projects, whereby City staff from all operational areas provide input and ideas relating to each project and its effect on operations, such as: Fire and Police Services staff provides insight into a project’s impact on emergency traffic responses, public lighting issues and other public safety concerns. Planning & Development staff gives direction regarding new development and the infrastructure needs relating to this growth. Other utility departments, such as the Transportation Department, Electric Department and Water Services Department exchange information regarding each project and coordinated timing of many of the related projects in an effort to create less inconvenience for the citizens affected. The timeline for the CIP planning process is outlined below: By using this team approach, the City develops cooperation among the departments, identifies potential problem areas, and prioritizes financing issues. The Capital Improvements Projects (CIP) generally consists of infrastructure and related construction and do not include small capital items such as furniture, equipment and vehicles. Significant maintenance projects, such as street repairs are not included in the capital project schedules. These maintenance type projects are not capitalized as a fixed asset and are always cash funded; therefore, they are considered operational in nature and are included in the departmental operating budget. The CIP schedules consolidate the capital spending priorities for all operating activities of the City, including all governmental and enterprise activities that provide services to the citizens of Georgetown. The CIP Schedules are included as part of the annual operating budget. The first year of the list becomes the capital budget for the approved budget year. The following pages outline the CIP Schedule for each activity and include anticipated projects, current year project location and sources of funding. January Initial Department Meetings formulating projects in CIP February / March Division Meetings to coordinate projects in CIP Finalized funding plan May / June Present CIP to Boards and City Council September Adopted along with Annual Operating Plan Funding Operating Revenue 620$ Street Maintenance Sales Tax 2,800 General Fund 875 Certificates of Obligation Bonds 1,011 Total Funding 5,306$ Project Costs Transportation Division Streets 3,675$ Stormwater Drainage 600 Airport Services 20 Sidewalks 996 Debt Issuance Cost 15 Total Project Cost 5,306$ 2016 Capital Improvement Summary (in thousands) 1 DR A F T Transportation Services Introduction Transportation Services manages, maintains and repairs City streets and right-of-way. Some of the additional responsibilities of the Street Department include traffic control, emergency response operations, special events, and assistance in code enforcement. Daily responsibilities include inspection of roadways for sign repair, pavement management and removal of sight obstructions. Transportation Services has experienced a growth in demand for maintenance and rehabilitation of the City’s roadway system. The Street Department Capital Improvement Budget includes maintenance and rehabilitation of the City’s roadway system and support of new transportation construction projects. Funding for maintenance and rehabilitation from the City’s General Fund is approximately $875,000 annually. Street Maintenance Sales Tax In November 2002, voters passed a quarter-cent sales tax increase that became effective April 1, 2003. Proceeds from the new tax can only be used to make improvements to streets in existence at the time of the election and cannot be used for construction of new streets. Revenues from this tax equal approximately $2 million per year for maintenance and rehabilitation of City streets. The tax was reauthorized by voters in November 2014; the tax will not be brought back to the voters for reauthorization until November 2018. Projects funded by the tax includes but not limited to; Quail Valley Subdivision, Western Trail and Sun City (north and south of Del Webb Blvd.). Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation In May 2001, voters approved a 4B half-cent sales tax for transportation improvements that provide economic benefit to the community. The 4B is known as the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation (GTEC). GTEC approves projects funded through this sales tax. Overall Transportation Improvement Plan The City adopted its Overall Transportation Plan (OTP) to guide the City’s growth and development, a revision to the OTP is currently underway. It is through this plan that future road construction is projected. As part of this process, The Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB) recommends potential projects to GTEC and the GTEC board approves its annual Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) which includes projects identified in the City’s Overall Transportation Plan that meet the GTEC eligibility requirements. The TIP is a five-year projection and is updated annually with year one being the annual GTEC budget that is approved by the City Council. The GTEC budget is not included in this CIP document. The OTP is reviewed by GTAB which makes recommendations to the City Council. In November 2008, voters authorized $46 million of General Obligation debt to be issued for road improvements. 2 DR A F T 2008 Voter Approved Transportation Bond Issue The City continues to work on two projects related to the 2008 Voter Approved Transportation Improvement Bond program, FM 1460 widening from Quail Valley Drive to University Boulevard and FM 971 Improvements at the intersection of North Austin Avenue. The City has worked with TxDOT, Williamson County and the City of Round Rock to Secure outside funding to supplement the bond proposal to complete Right of Way (ROW) acquisitions and construction of the remaining two segments of unimproved two lane rural FM 1460 to a four lane arterial with adequate ROW for the ultimate six lanes. Project design is complete and let for construction by TxDOT, construction to start in 2015 after all utilities have been relocated. FM 971 intersection improvements at North Austin Avenue have been designed to improve access and mobility around the site. Design is nearing completion and the environmental clearances are being sought to make the project ready for construction bidding. Historic Downtown In the past few years, several rehabilitation and maintenance projects have focused on the Historic Downtown Square Area. The City will continue efforts to maintain and rehabilitate Historic Georgetown, as well as keep pace with the growth of our community. GASB 34 – Modified Approach The Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement Number 34 allows for an alternative to depreciation expense for certain infrastructure, termed the modified approach. The following conditions must be met: • The government manages the eligible assets using an asset management system to: o Keep an up-to-date asset inventory, o Perform condition assessments and report the results on a measurement scale, and o Estimate the annual amount to maintain and preserve the eligible infrastructure assets at the condition level established and disclosed by the government • The government must document that the eligible assets are being preserved approximately at or above the condition level established and disclosed by the government. The City completed its inventory and implemented its pavement management information system in February 2005. The initial assessment rated Georgetown’s street condition as “good” with a 90 Pavement Condition Index (PCI). The Council has directed staff to incorporate a policy to maintain a minimum average PCI of 85. Current funding should adequately fund that level of PCI within Georgetown for the near future. The PCI for fiscal year 2011 was 87.7 and the PCI for 2014 was 87.3. Growth factors in housing and new road construction could impact that condition over time. This system will be monitored closely and reviewed in detail again in late 2017. The proposed CIP includes funding for an update of the Pavement Management System in 2018. 3 DR A F T 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (Thousands of dollars) Projected Annual Project Cost $4,671 $4,384 $4,559 $4,643 $4,766 $23,023 Debt issuance cost 15 9 10 9 9 $52 Sources of Funding Street Maintenance Sales Tax 2,800 2,900 3,000 3,200 3,300 15,200 General Obligation Bonds 1,011 618 694 577 600 3,500 General Fund 875 875 875 875 875 4,375 City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Capital Improvement Program FY 2016 to 2020 Thecapitalbudgetincludesmajorrehabilitationof the City's roadway systems.In November2002,voters first approved a quartercent sales taxfor maintenanceof existingCity streets.This sales tax revenueprovides the majority offunding for streetrehabiliation projects.Thequartercentsales tax must bereauthorizedby the voterseveryfouryears.It will need to bereauthorized in November 2018. Street Maintenance Sales Tax General Obligation Bonds General Fund Combined 5 Year Estimated Funding Sources 4 DR A F T Prior Project Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 (Thousands of dollars) Current Projects:Street Rehabilitation $945 $875 $875 $875 $875 $875 Chip Seal 378 1,620 400 400 500 500 Rejuvenate 501 350 400 500 500 600 Cutler Process 1,171 414 800 900 900 900 Point Repair - 416 300 200 300 300 Arterials ReservesArterials Reserves 575 - 500 500 500 500 Sidewalks Sidewalks - 996 1,109 1,184 1,068 1,091 Road Bonds FM 1460 4,371 - - - - - Totals $7,941 $4,671 $4,384 $4,559 $4,643 $4,766 Projected City of Georgetown, Texas Transportation Capital Improvement Program FY 2016 to 2020 $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Th o u s a n d s Streets Capital Project Cost 5 DR A F T Responsible Division: Street Department Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 575 - 500 500 500 500 2,575 Description : Funding Sources : Funded with Street Maintenance Sales Tax 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Arterials - 500 500 500 500 Notes: Subprojects (000): City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program Arterials Reserves Projected Arterials are a higher classification of roadway from residential and collector streets. Arterials are usually built to a higher standard to accommodate a high volume of residential and truck traffic. The heavy vehicles and high volumes on these roads can cause an exponential rate of deterioration when pavement scores begin to fall below acceptable levels. A higher priority is placed on this classification when evaluating scores for the funds to be spent here for treatment and maintenance. Photo / Map Placeholder 6 DR A F T Responsible Division: Street Department Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 945 875 875 875 875 875 5,320 Description : Funding Sources : Funded with General Fund 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 6th St @ 7th St improvements 40 175 - - - Katherine St 50 - 200 - - 17th St 75 - 350 - - Main St 75 - - 225 - W. 10th St - 90 - - - Pine St & Holly St rehab 129 100 - 200 - W. 11th St - 416 - - - Hart St - 50 250 - - East St stabilization - - - 450 - Cutler Process 506 44 75 - 875 Notes: Subprojects (000): City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program Street Rehabilitation Projected Streets listed as subprojects under "Rehabilitation" were identified as being in most need of repair or rehabilitation because of their asphalt and subgrade failures, drainage problems and deteriorating curbs. Subgrade stabilization, valley gutter installation and curb and gutter addition or replacement are combined with surface treatments to bring the pavement condition back into the high 90s. Photo / Map Placeholder 7 DR A F T Responsible Division: Street Department Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 501 350 400 500 500 600 2,851 Description : Funding Sources : Funded with Street Maintenance Sales Tax 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Rejuvenator 350 400 500 500 600 Notes: City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program Rejuvenate Projected Subprojects (000): Application of asphalt pavement to provide ultraviolet protection and seal minute cracks and pavement flaws. Restores a uniform dark asphalt color to pavement covering the squeegee lines left after crack sealing. This process applied to pavement in moderately good condition can prolong the need for more costly applications. Photo / Map Placeholder 8 DR A F T Responsible Division: Street Department Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 1,171 414 800 900 900 900 5,085 Description : Funding Sources : Funded with Street Maintenance Sales Tax 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Cutler Process 414 800 900 900 900 Notes: Subprojects (000): Streets listed as subprojects under "Maintenance" were identified as being in most need of surface treatments with only minor repairs to roadways. Roadways are evaluated by history, condition, age and type of previous treatments performed. Photo / Map Placeholder City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program Cutler Process Projected 9 DR A F T Responsible Division: Street Department Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 378 1,620 400 400 500 500 3,798 Description : Funding Sources : Funded with Street Maintenance Sales Tax 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Chip seal 1,620 400 400 500 500 Notes: Subprojects (000): City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program Chip Seal Projected Photo / Map Placeholder Oil and rock maintenance application to provide a seal and wear protection, sealing current cracks and making a self healing barrier for new cracks. Arterial streets include: DB Wood / Shell Rd (Lakeview to Westbury), Williams Dr (DB Wood to Lakewood), Lakeway (NW Blvd to Airport Rd). Residential streets include: River Ridge Ln (Leander to Rim Rock), River View Dr (Leander Rd to River Down Rd), River Down Rd (Riverview Dr to Dead end), Rim Rock Dr (Riverview to River Down), River View Cv, Ridge Run (River Down to Rim Rock), Ridge Run Ct, Fox Hollow (Riverview to River Ridge), Edgemont Dr, Hideaway Cv, South Ridge Cr, Little Bend Dr, South Ridge Ct, Woodcrest Ct, Manorwood Ct, Rim Rock Cv, Bent Tree Dr, Ridgemont Ct, and Broad Vista Ct. 10 DR A F T Responsible Division: Street Department Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total - 416 300 200 300 300 1,516 Description : Funding Sources : Funded with Street Maintenace Sales Tax 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Point Repair Overlay 416 300 200 300 300 Notes: Subprojects (000): City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program Point Repair Projected Streets listed as subprojects under "Maintenance" were identified as being in most need of surface treatments with only minor repairs to roadways. Roadways are evaluated by history, condition, age and number and type of previous treatments performed. Photo / Map Placeholder 11 DR A F T Responsible Division: Street Department Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 996 1,109 1,184 1,068 1,091 5,448 Description : Funding Sources : Funded with Transportation Bonds 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 8th St Church - Myrtle 6 37 - - - Austin Ave 8th St - University Ave 14 78 - - - Ph 1 Signal and Curb Ramp Improvements 253 253 253 102 - 7th St 56 - - - - 10th St Main St - Rock St 94 - - - - 8th St Austin Ave - MLK Dr 99 - - - - Church St 8th St - 9th St 123 - - - - 11th St Main St - Rock St 151 - - - - Access Route to Government Services 200 - - - - Other Sidewalks as determined - 741 931 966 1,091 Notes: City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program Sidewalks Projected Subprojects (000): Photo / Map Placeholder In 2014, the City completed a review of the pedestrian network within the right of way in the City limits, as well as a comprehensive accessibility review in the downtown district. The study evaluated the condition, presence of pedestrian infrastructure and need as defined by public input, staff recommendations and legal requirements. The study recommends $10 million in improvements to the network including $3.6 million in the downtown district. Recommended improvements support the City's adopted ADA Transition Plan, the Downtown Master Plan, the Parks & Rec Trails Master Plan, the Overall Transportation Plan and the City's Comprehensive Plan. Transportation Services has worked to ensure pedestrian improvements are coupled with street and utility improvements to maximize the City's investment. 12 DR A F T Stormwater Drainage Utility Introduction The Stormwater Drainage Utility manages and maintains stormwater infrastructure operations and facilities. Some of the additional responsibilities of the Stormwater Drainage Utility are assisting other Divisions in City code enforcement. Daily responsibilities include drainage and flood control when needed, right-of-way mowing and cleaning, street sign maintenance and street cleaning operations. The Stormwater Drainage Utility has been focusing on meeting the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Phase II regulations and requirements regarding stormwater control in municipalities. In 2016, the City expects to continue efforts to meet the forthcoming stormwater control mandates. The FY 2016 Five Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) includes projects aimed at improving stormwater drainage, erosion control and the compilation of stormwater assets. The Stormwater department completed the Smith Branch buy-out program in FY 2015. The Smith Branch buy-out was a three year program to buy-out 16 homes in San Jose and Quail Valley neighborhoods. During the process the City only needed to by 8 of the homes. 13 DR A F T 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (Thousands of dollars) Projected Annual Project Cost $600 $600 $2,750 $900 $600 $5,450 Debt Issuance Cost - - 18 - - 18 Sources of Funding Operating Revenue 600 600 600 900 600 3,300 Self Supporting CO's - - 2,168 - - 2,168 City of Georgetown, Texas Stormwater Capital Improvement Program FY 2016 to 2020 TheCitywillbedetermining a sourceofrevenue to fundthe EPA Phase II regulations,theRegionalStormwaterPlan,and otherrequirementsregardingstormwatercontrolwithinmunicipalities.The most likelyrevenuesourceisthrough a combination of stormwater fees and developer fees paid in-lieu of onsite detention. Operating Revenue Self Supporting CO's Combined 5 Year Estimated Funding Sources 14 DR A F T Prior Project Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 (Thousands of dollars) New Projects: Curb and Gutter Replacements $300 $500 $500 $500 $800 $500 Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrades 100 100 100 100 100 100 Smith Branch Buy-outs 2,215 - - - - - Serenada Culvert Improvement - - - 500 - - NW Blvd Drainage - - - 350 - - Airport Road @ Pecan Branch - - - 1,300 - - Totals $2,615 $600 $600 $2,750 $900 $600 Projected City of Georgetown, Texas Stormwater Capital Improvement Program FY 2016 to 2020 $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Th o u s a n d s Stormwater Capital Project Cost 15 DR A F T Responsible Division: Stormwater Drainage Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 300 500 500 500 800 500 3,100 Description : Funding Sources : Funded with cash from Drainage Utility 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Curb and Gutter Replacement 500 500 500 500 500 Second Street Drainage - - - 300 - Notes: MAP OR PHOTO City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program Curb and Gutter Replacements Subprojects (000): Projected This project will consist of replacing deteriorating stand-up curbs with curb and gutter. Stand-up curbs throughout the City will be evaulated on their condition and their potential to cause damage to roadways. The curbs identified in areas with the poorest drainage are most likely to contribute to road damage. These curbs will be targeted for replacement. These replacements will save the City from having to perform much more costly street rehabilitation. 16 DR A F T Responsible Division: Stormwater Drainage Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 600 Description : Funding Sources : Funded with cash from Drainage Utility 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrade 100 100 100 100 100 Notes: Subprojects (000): Rehabilitation of ponds above and beyond monthly mowing and trash or debris removal. Examples may include dredging of ditches, stormwater boxes or water quality / detention ponds; construction of end treatments, fencing and alterations of existing storm drain features; and removal and replacement of filtration devices. City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Program Stormwater Infrastructure Upgrades Projected MAP OR PHOTO 17 DR A F T Airport Services Introduction Airport Services manages, maintains and repairs the City’s airport. Some of the additional responsibilities of the airport department include traffic control, emergency response operations and special events. Daily responsibilities include inspection of runways for sign repair, pavement management and removal of sight obstructions. Airport Services has experienced a growth in demand for maintenance and rehabilitation of the City’s runway system. 18 DR A F T 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (Thousands of dollars) Projected Annual Project Cost 20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20$ Sources of Funding Operating Revenues 20 - - - - 20 Prior Project Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 (Thousands of dollars) Runway 1836 Runway 1836 Lights 163$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Parallel TW-A & MITL 870 - - - - - Airport Master Plan - 20 - - - - Totals 1,033$ 20$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Projected City of Georgetown, Texas Airport Capital Improvement Program FY 2016 to 2020 The Airport five yearCapitalImprovementProgramfundingcomesfrom a combinationof cashcontributions,debt funding and previous year-end excess funds. $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 20 1 1 20 1 2 20 1 3 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 20 1 7 20 1 8 20 1 9 20 2 0 Th o u s a n d s Capital Project Cost 19 DR A F T Responsible Division: Airport Financial Plan (thousands of dollars) : Prior Budget Years 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total - 20 - - - - 20 Description : Funding Sources : Airport Fund 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Master Plan 20 - - - - Notes: Subprojects : Projected Photo / Map Placeholder Update to the 2005 Airport Master Plan to reaffirm or amend the Century Plan Policies, Goals and Strategies of the plan to the Vision and Mission Statements of the 2030 Plan, and to update the Short, Intermediate and Long Term Projects/Actions related to the continued maintenance and development of the airport. City of Georgetown, Texas Capital Improvement Projects Master Plan 20 DR A F T