Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout13-DebtDebt Debt Table of Contents Debt Management & Policy.................................................................................................................217 Outstanding Debt Summary................................................................................................................218 General Debt Service Outstanding Debt By Type.....................................................................................................219 Legal Debt Margin for General Obligation..............................................................................209 Principal & Interest Requirements -Tax-Supported................................................................220 Principal & Interest Requirements - Self-Supporting..............................................................221 Utility Debt Service Principal & Interest Requirements..........................................................................................222 Utility Revenue Bond Debt Coverage.....................................................................................223 Proposed Debt Issues.........................................................................................................................224 Principal & Interest Requirements – GTEC – A Blended Component Unit for Reference Only).......225 217 Debt Management & Policy The City’s goal is to fund capital improvement projects on a ”pay as you go” basis wherever possible. For large infrastructure projects and during heavy growth, debt financing is sometimes required. Debt financed projects must meet the City’s financing criteria as included in the Fiscal and Budgetary Policy. X. Debt Management The City of Georgetown recognizes the primary purpose of capital facilities is to provide services to the community. Using debt financing to meet the capital needs of the community must be evaluated according to efficiency and equity. • Efficiency must be evaluated to determine the highest rate of return for a given investment of resources. • Equity is resolved by determining who should pay for the cost of capital improvements. In meeting the demand for additional services, the City will strive to balance the needs between debt financing and “pay as of you” methods. The City realizes that failure to meet the demands of growth may inhibit its continued economic viability, but also realizes that too much debt may have detrimental effects on the City’s long-term financial condition. The City will issue debt only for the purpose of acquiring or constructing capital assets for the general benefit of its citizens and to allow it to fulfill its various purposes as a city. Debt financing will be considered for non-continuous capital improvements of which future citizens will be benefited. Financing alternatives will be explored prior to debt issuance. When the City of Georgetown utilizes long-term financing, it will ensure that the debt is soundly financed by: • Conservatively projecting the revenue sources that will be utilized to pay the debt. • Financing the improvement over a period not greater than the useful life of the improvement. • Determining that the cost benefit of the improvement including interest costs is positive. The City may utilize the benefits of short-term debt financing to purchasing operating equipment provided the debt doesn’t extend past the useful life of the asset, and the potential impact to the tax rate is within policy guidelines. The I & S (interest and sinking) portion of the tax rate can not exceed $0.04 for short-term debt (3-10 years). The City’s debt management objective is to maintain level debt service that does not adversely impact tax or utility rates and does not hinder the City’s ability to effectively operate the utility systems, street network, or other facilities. The City’s debt payments must stay within provisions of state law, bond covenants and council adopted policies. All of these criteria and objectives are met with the debt financing proposed in this budget. The City of Georgetown’s bonds are rated: General Obligation Utility Revenue Moody’s A2 A2 Standard & Poor’s AA- AA- 218 Outstanding Debt Summary - By Type as of October 1, 2007 Debt 2007/2008 2007/2008 Outstanding %Principal & Interest Handling Fees GENERAL GOVERNMENT TAX SUPPORTED DEBT: Certificate of Obligation and General Obligation Bonds: Streets and Transportation 440,080 1%125,358 1,139 Parks and Recreation Facilities (excluding Recreation Center) 1,086,400 2%109,168 300 Public Safety Facilities 5,603,228 11%1,134,989 1,745 Other City Facilities (including Propositions 1-3) 45,196,404 86%4,098,029 6,116 TOTAL TAX SUPPORTED DEBT 52,326,112$ 100%5,467,544$ 9,300$ ENTERPRISE DEBT: Utility Revenue Bonds: Electric 23,801,842 43%2,326,204 1,500 Water Services Irrigation 767,179 1%67,138 1,000 Water 12,547,788 23%1,628,653 1,000 Wastewater 13,953,191 25%1,621,865 1,000 Total Utility Revenue Debt 51,070,000 5,643,860 4,500 Certificates of Obligation Bonds - Self-Supporting: (2) Airport 1,509,214 3%209,675 420 Sanitation 515,000 1%39,765 31 Stormwater Drainage 2,515,052 5%268,861 593 Total CO Bonds - Self Supporting 4,539,266 518,301 1,044 TOTAL ENTERPRISE DEBT 55,609,266$ 100%6,162,161$ 5,544$ TOTAL CITY SUPPORTED DEBT 107,935,378$ 11,629,705$ 14,844$ CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS (1): Brazos River Authority (BRA) Contractual Obligation 27,344,601 808,557 Total Contractual Obligations 27,344,601$ 808,557$ (1) Funds Georgetown's pro-rata share of the Williamson County Raw Water Line. (2) Does not include CO's issued on behalf of the Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation (GTEC) that are repaid through GTEC sales tax. 219 Outstanding Debt by Type Legal Debt Margin for General Obligations: All taxable property within the City is subject to the assessment, levy and collection by the City of a continuing, direct annual ad valorem tax sufficient to provide for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds within the limits prescribed by law. Article XI, Section 5, of the Texas Constitution is applicable to the City, and limits the maximum ad valorem tax rate to $2.50 per $100 assessed valuation (for all City purposes). The Charter of the City adopts the provisions of the constitution without further limitation. Under rules promulgated by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas, such office will not approve tax bonds of the City unless the City can demonstrate its ability to pay debt service requirements on all outstanding City tax bonds, including the issue to be approved, from a tax levy of $1.50 per $100 of valuation, based on 90% collection of tax. Allowable levy per $100 valuation $1.50000 Proposed levy for debt service (included in total adopted rate of $.35659) 0.15337 Percentage of allowable levy used 11.0% Assuming the maximum tax rate for debt service of $1.50 on the January 1, 2007, certified assessed valuation of $3,611,204,319 at 90% collection, tax revenue of $48,751,258 would be produced. This revenue could service the debt on $582,596,180 issued as 20-year serial bonds at 5.50% (with level debt service payments). 220 Summary of Debt Service Charges to Maturity Debt funded by dedicated portion of local ad valorem tax Certificates of Obligation – TAX SUPPORTED Year Ending Outstanding Total September 30 Beginning of Year Interest Principal Requirements 2008 52,326,112 2,534,959 2,932,585 5,467,544 2009 49,393,527 2,106,827 3,178,443 5,285,270 2010 46,215,084 1,975,715 3,201,357 5,177,072 2011 43,013,727 1,853,933 3,123,029 4,976,962 2012 39,890,698 1,725,598 3,021,769 4,747,367 2013 36,868,928 1,597,823 3,114,167 4,711,990 2014 33,754,762 1,470,724 3,216,229 4,686,954 2015 30,538,532 1,333,936 3,121,775 4,455,710 2016 27,416,757 1,197,497 3,165,465 4,362,962 2017 24,251,293 1,068,220 3,262,348 4,330,568 2018 20,988,945 933,849 2,844,882 3,778,730 2019 18,144,063 811,777 2,625,235 3,437,012 2020 15,518,829 698,288 2,277,085 2,975,373 2021 13,241,743 599,333 2,297,243 2,896,576 2022 10,944,501 498,759 2,045,756 2,544,514 2023 8,898,745 407,940 2,133,744 2,541,684 2024 6,765,000 309,781 2,165,000 2,474,781 2025 4,600,000 211,350 2,255,000 2,466,350 2026 2,345,000 107,481 1,255,000 1,362,481 2027 1,090,000 49,913 1,090,000 1,139,913 21,493,703 52,326,112 73,819,815 221 Summary of Debt Service Charges to Maturity Debt issued for specific purpose and repaid through dedicated revenues Certificates of Obligation – SELF SUPPORTING Enterprise Funds Year Ending Outstanding Total September 30 Beginning of Year Interest Principal Requirements 2008 4,539,265 213,985 304,316 518,301 2009 4,234,950 186,745 326,446 513,191 2010 3,908,504 172,098 313,588 485,685 2011 3,594,917 159,482 331,915 491,397 2012 3,263,002 144,458 306,164 450,622 2013 2,956,838 130,727 318,767 449,494 2014 2,638,071 117,085 363,715 480,800 2015 2,274,356 100,644 382,892 483,536 2016 1,891,464 82,914 398,336 481,250 2017 1,493,129 65,852 414,441 480,293 2018 1,078,688 48,055 353,919 401,974 2019 724,769 31,745 191,554 223,299 2020 533,215 23,424 112,692 136,115 2021 420,524 18,620 100,524 119,144 2022 320,000 14,310 60,000 74,310 2023 260,000 11,700 60,000 71,700 2024 200,000 9,000 65,000 74,000 2025 135,000 6,075 65,000 71,075 2026 70,000 3,150 35,000 38,150 2027 35,000 1,575 35,000 36,575 1,541,644 4,539,266 6,080,909 222 Summary of Utility Debt Service Charges to Maturity Revenue bonds issued to finance construction of electric, water and wastewater improvements, and secured by the net operating revenue of all combined utilities. The allocation of debt principal is based on the use of each bond issue. Each utility pays debt service from operating revenues. The Brazos River Authority Contractual Obligations are the liability of the Water Services Fund. Year Ending Outstanding Total BRA September 30 Beginning of Year Interest Principal Requirements Contract 2008 51,070,000 2,443,860 3,200,000 5,643,860 (1)(2) 808,557 2009 47,870,000 2,116,150 3,435,000 5,551,150 853,324 2010 44,435,000 1,965,075 3,545,000 5,510,075 963,297 2011 40,890,000 1,809,727 3,305,000 5,114,727 1,365,598 2012 37,585,000 1,667,483 3,395,000 5,062,483 1,023,396 2013 34,190,000 1,521,503 3,210,000 4,731,503 1,021,945 2014 30,980,000 1,382,335 3,345,000 4,727,335 1,011,637 2015 27,635,000 1,234,370 3,520,000 4,754,370 1,006,612 2016 24,115,000 1,079,710 2,580,000 3,659,710 1,011,637 2017 21,535,000 968,285 2,660,000 3,628,285 1,011,368 2018 18,875,000 854,225 2,810,000 3,664,225 1,011,096 2019 16,065,000 730,890 2,425,000 3,155,890 995,745 2020 13,640,000 623,044 2,540,000 3,163,044 1,359,667 2021 11,100,000 508,444 2,285,000 2,793,444 1,300,070 2022 8,815,000 404,354 2,270,000 2,674,354 1,295,007 2023 6,545,000 299,164 1,850,000 2,149,164 1,297,077 2024 4,695,000 214,288 1,400,000 1,614,288 1,296,546 2025 3,295,000 149,850 1,465,000 1,614,850 1,300,529 2026 1,830,000 83,156 1,225,000 1,308,156 1,288,528 2027 605,000 27,225 605,000 632,225 1,296,419 2028 1,293,666 2029 1,299,085 2030 1,297,491 2031 734,477 2032 201,829 20,083,136 51,070,000 71,153,136 27,344,601 223 Water Services Electric Fund Fund Total REVENUE: All Other Revenue 5,291,370 1,808,850 7,100,220 Interest 555,300 75,000 630,300 System Billings 19,366,550 56,387,000 75,753,550 Total Revenues 25,213,220 58,270,850 83,484,070 EXPENSES: Departments 16,058,153 53,574,546 69,632,699 Total Expenditures 16,058,153 53,574,546 69,632,699 Net Available for Debt Service 9,155,067 4,696,304 13,851,371 Annual Debt Requirement 3,699,700 2,649,850 6,349,550 Times Coverage Ratio 2.47 1.77 2.18 Utility Revenue Bond Debt Coverage The City has agreed through its bond ordinances to maintain a minimum "times coverage" ratio of 1.25. The ordinance allows the City to eliminate its reserve fund requirement with coverage of 1.35 or better. The times ratio is calculated using the net revenue available for debt service from the combined Water, Electric and Wastewater utilities' operations divided by the combined debt service requirement of the utilities. The times coverage ratio is also reviewed by bond rating agency analysts when the City receives a rating for a potential bond issue. The following combined times coverage ratios have occurred, based on actual revenues and expenditures, for the fiscal years indicated: The 2007/08 Proposed Operating Plan provides the revenue to debt ratios shown below. The City’s Fiscal and Budgetary Policy requires that each utility maintain separate coverage of at least 1.5. The excess coverage provided by each fund is used to pay for related utility system capital improvements and other uses approved by the City Council. UTILITY REVENUE BOND COVERAGE 224 Outstanding Debt Summary 2007/08: Utility Revenue Debt: 4 Debt proceeds will be used for system expansion and repaid through continued growth of the City’s customer base. General Debt: 4 Short-term obligations will be issued for $1,257,100 to fund public safety vehicles and equipment. 4 Long-term obligations will be issued for $2.9 million to fund general capital projects and new fire truck. (1) General Capital Projects & Equipment Summary: Parking Lot rehabilitation 385,000 Old Library Renovations 300,000 Downtown Parking Garage 250,000 Facility Improvements 456,000 Public Safety Vehicles/Equipment 1,646,143 Early Warning System Sirens 214,200 Street Equipment 205,500 Oak Tree Drive Bridge 600,000 4,056,843 Bond Issue Costs 161,994 General Cpaital Projects & Equipment Bond Costs 4,218,837 Outstanding 9/30/07 Debt Principal 07/08 Principal Reduction Estimated 2008 Debt Estimated 9/30/08 Outstanding Debt TAX SUPPORTED DEBT: General Debt Service: General Obligation/Certificates of Obligation 52,326,112 (2,932,585) 4,218,837 (1) 53,612,363 SELF SUPPORTED DEBT: General Debt Service: Stormwater 2,515,052 (149,871) 750,000 3,115,181 Airport 1,509,214 (144,505) 1,364,709 Sanitation 515,000 (10,000) 505,000 total GDS: 56,865,378 (3,236,961) 4,968,837 58,597,253 Utility Revenue Debt: Electric 23,801,842 (1,152,644) 5,425,000 28,074,198 Irrigation 767,179 (35,494) 670,000 1,401,685 Wastewater 13,953,191 (969,775) 5,810,000 18,793,416 Water 12,547,788 (1,042,087) 11,505,701 total Utility Revenue Debt: 51,070,000 (3,200,000) 11,905,000 59,775,000 TOTAL OUTSTANDING DEBT:107,935,378 (6,436,961) 16,873,837 118,372,253 Outstanding 9/30/07 Debt Principal 07/08 Principal Reduction Proposed New 2008 Debt Estimated 9/30/08 Outstanding Debt Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation: Self Supported 16,529,622 (348,100) 16,181,522 Sales Tax Supported 11,330,000 (215,000) 11,115,000 total GTEC: 27,859,622 (563,100) - 27,296,522 225 A Blended Component Unit of the City of Georgetown Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation Summary of Debt Service Charges to Maturity Certificates of Obligation issued by the City on behalf of GTEC, repaid by sales tax collections. Year Ending Outstanding Total September 30 Beginning of Year Interest Principal Requirements 2008 11,330,000 654,493 215,000 869,493 2009 11,115,000 468,359 400,000 868,359 2010 10,715,000 452,359 415,000 867,359 2011 10,300,000 435,759 430,000 865,759 2012 9,870,000 418,559 450,000 868,559 2013 9,420,000 400,559 465,000 865,559 2014 8,955,000 381,959 485,000 866,959 2015 8,470,000 362,559 505,000 867,559 2016 7,965,000 342,359 525,000 867,359 2017 7,440,000 321,359 545,000 866,359 2018 6,895,000 299,559 570,000 869,559 2019 6,325,000 276,759 590,000 866,759 2020 5,735,000 252,421 615,000 867,421 2021 5,120,000 226,591 640,000 866,591 2022 4,480,000 199,391 670,000 869,391 2023 3,810,000 170,581 695,000 865,581 2024 3,115,000 140,175 730,000 870,175 2025 2,385,000 107,325 760,000 867,325 2026 1,625,000 73,125 795,000 868,125 2027 830,000 37,350 830,000 867,350 6,021,600 11,330,000 17,351,600