Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout13-StatisticalStatistical 223 Miscellaneous Statistical Data Form of government Council - Manager Area 36.54 Miles of streets 422 Number of street lights 2,589 2006 average unemployment rate 4.09% Total City employees 453.25 Number of parks 23 Acres of parks 380 Number of libraries 1 Number of library items in circulation 347,662 Number of Fire stations 4 Number of Firefighters 60 Number of Police stations 1 Number of Police officers 68 Number of Electric customers 18,549 Number of Water customers 17,979 Number of Wastewater customers 15,811 Number of Sanitation customers 16,240 Number of GISD Attendance Centers 15 # of Teachers 668 Average Years Experience 12 Student/Teacher Ratio 12.7 Total Number of Students 9,400 African-American 3.7% Hispanic 29.0% White 66.0% Economically Disadvantaged 34.0% Elevation 750 feet Annual Average Temperature 68o Monthly Average High Temperature 96o Monthly Average Low Temperature 39o Weather Education Utility Customers Public Safety Recreation and Culture General City Information 224 Key Indicators - 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000 30,000,000 General Fund Budget General Fund Budget 17,624,96 19,366,09 20,702,19 23,868,92 28,158,37 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 0 100 200 300 400 500 Acres of Parkland Acres of Parkland 355 365 385 415 450 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 - 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 Area of Georgetown (square miles) Area (sq miles) 24.47 24.47 25.73 26.51 36.54 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 225 Key Indicators Tax Rates 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 Adopted Tax Rate 0.30261 0.32194 0.34626 0.34626 0.36728 Effective Tax Rate 0.2969 0.31277 0.31974 0.31326 0.34394 Rollback Tax Rate 0.30261 0.32685 0.35119 0.35914 0.37699 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Components of Tax Rate Debt Service 0.09954 0.10017 0.11332 0.13913 0.14749 Operations & Maintenance 0.20307 0.22177 0.23294 0.20713 0.21979 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 140,000 150,000 160,000 170,000 180,000 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 Average Residential Value Avg. Residential Value 163,882 159,271 163,751 166,458 179,064 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 226 Peer Benchmarking An important way to measure our economic condition is through benchmarking, which is a point of reference from which measurements or progress can be made. Benchmarking measures our progress from a point in time and is something that serves as a standard by which others may be measured. Benchmarking data is taken from 2005/06 budgets. *Both Georgetown and San Marcos own and operate an electric utility. Benchmarking allows the City to focus on the relative level of comparison in key areas within the Central Texas area and find ways to close gaps when indicated. Population 88,500 57,868 46,112 41,294 28,416 103,210 42,618 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 Kil l een Ro u n d R oc k Te m p l e Sa n M a rcos Cedar P a rk Georgetown P f lugerville Sales Tax Per Capita $500 $302 $220 $161 $147 $55 $99 - 100 200 300 400 500 600Ro u nd R oc k San Marcos T empl e Kille e n G e orgetown Ced a r Pa r k P flu g e rv i l le Ad Valorem Revenue Per Capita $237 $189 $245 $312 $280 $222 $199 - 50 100 150 200 250 300 350Pflug e rvill e Ce d a r P ark T emple Ro und Ro c k George t own K il l ee n San Marcos Employees Per 1,000 Population 10.98 10.62 10.14 7.94 7.39 12.24 9.11 - 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Te m p l e Pflugervil l e S a n M a rc o s *Geo rg e to wn *Kil l een R o u n d R o c k Ce dar Par k 227 Peer Benchmarking Georgetown has chosen to measure itself against cities in the surrounding area that have similar size, location or growth issues and benchmarks. Benchmarking data is taken from 2005/06 budgets. General Fund Expenditures Per Capita $801 $798 $647 $578 $460$474 $461 $0.0 $200.0 $400.0 $600.0 $800.0 $1,000.0 T e m ple Rou n d R o ck S a n Marco s Georg e t o wn Pf l u g e r v i l l e K il l e e n Cedar P ark General Debt Per Capita $1,570 $1,444 $1,210 $1,165 $619 $723 $681 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800Ce dar Pa r k P fl u ge rvil l e San Ma rco s Round Rock Templ e Ge o rge t o wn Ki l lee n Assessed Valuation (in billions) $2.52 $1.40 $2.64 $5.14 $3.03 $2.36 $1.86 - 1 2 3 4 5 6Round Rock Ki ll e en Geo r getow n Temple Ced a r Par k Sa n M arcos P f lu g erv i lle Assessed Valuation Per Capita $49,181 $29,317 $55,299 $64,006 $58,079 $43,555 $40,229 - 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000Georg e to w n Round Roc k Ced ar Pa rk Pfl u ge rv il l e Te m p le San Ma r co s Ki ll e en 228 Financial Ratio Comparisons Georgetown has chosen to measure its financial condition against cities in the surrounding area that have similar size, location or growth issues. The acceptable levels referred to below are based on the City’s Fiscal and Budgetary Policy. Fund Balance to Equity ratio is a function of fund balance to equity for governmental type funds (General Fund, Special Revenue, etc.) Working capital is the liquid reserve available to meet uncertainties. It is a function of current assets less current liabilities. Current ratio and quick ratio are measures of liquidity. Liquidity is an organization’s ability to convert noncash assets into cash or to obtain cash to meet impending obligations. Current ratio includes inventories and prepaid expenses, whereas the quick ratio excludes inventories and prepaid expenditures. A ratio of 1 or greater is an acceptable level for both ratios. Fund Balance to Equity Ratio 0.60 0.57 0.41 0.36 0.19 0.46 - 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 C e d a r P a r k K i l l e e n S a n M a r c o s R o u n d R o c k T e m p l e G e o r g e t o w n Working Capital (in millions) $13.1 $22.9$28.4$28.3 $47.3 $63.2 $0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 R o u n d R o c k K i l l e e n S a n M a r c o s G e o r g e t o w n T e m p l e C e d a r P a r k Current Ratio 12.75 12.04 9.65 9.51 8.65 7.62 - 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 G e o r g e t o w n K i l l e e n C e d a r P a r k R o u n d R o c k T e m p l e S a n M a r c o s Quick Ratio 12.55 11.97 9.49 9.27 9.27 8.50 - 5.00 10.00 15.00 G e o r g e t o w n K i l l e e n R o u n d R o c k C e d a r P a r k S a n M a r c o s T e m p l e 229 Enterprise Operational Coverage 1.85 1.71 1.70 1.49 1.39 1.30 - 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 K i l l e e n C e d a r P a r k T e m p l e R o u n d R o c k G e o r g e t o w n S a n M a r c o s Times Coverage Ratio 8.83 6.20 3.56 3.28 2.40 1.40 - 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 R o u n d R o c k K i l l e e n S a n M a r c o s G e o r g e t o w n T e m p l e C e d a r P a r k Financial Ratio Comparisons Financial ratios provide meaningful data and help identify major trends in the City’s financial condition and in comparison to surrounding communities. Financial ratio data is taken from 2003/04 Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports. Debt due to assessed value is a ratio of the assessed value to tax supported debt. A ratio of less than 5 is acceptable. The ratio of current liabilities plus long term debt to total assets. A ratio of 1 or lower is accept- able. Number of times the utility debt service requirements would be covered by the current utility operating revenue net of current operating expense. A ratio of 1.5 or greater is acceptable. Enterprise operational coverage is a ratio of operating revenue to operating expenses of the City’s combined enterprise funds. A ratio of 1.25 or greater is acceptable. Debt Ratio 0.52 0.40 0.40 0.39 0.32 0.25 - 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 C e d a r P a r k T e m p l e K i l l e e n S a n M a r c o s R o u n d R o c k G e o r g e t o w n Debt to Assessed Value 2.97% 2.10%2.28% 1.24% 2.06% 2.84% 0.00% 0.50% 1.00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.50% 3.00% 3.50% 4.00% R o u n d R o c k C e d a r P a r k T e m p l e K i l l e e n S a n M a r c o s G e o r g e t o w n 230 Certified Property Value Ten Year History - 500,000,000 1,000,000,000 1,500,000,000 2,000,000,000 2,500,000,000 3,000,000,000 3,500,000,000 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Ce r t i f i e d A s s e s s e d V a l u e 0.3000 0.3100 0.3200 0.3300 0.3400 0.3500 0.3600 0.3700 0.3800 0.3900 0.4000 Ta x R a t e s Fiscal Certified Tax Increase (Dec)Percent of Year Assessed Value Rate In Value Levy Collected 1997 633,469,050 0.3800 17.54% 98.22% 1998 984,123,199 0.3500 55.35% 98.60% 1999 1,199,831,232 0.3500 21.92% 98.80% 2000 1,410,072,042 0.3400 17.52% 95.43% 2001 1,629,344,909 0.3141 15.55% 98.75% 2002 1,938,770,383 0.3071 18.99% 98.53% 2003 2,116,042,131 0.3026 9.14% 98.61% 2004 2,247,047,140 0.3219 6.19% 98.72% 2005 2,391,137,407 0.3463 6.41% 98.89% 2006 2,643,057,606 0.3463 10.54% 98.94% 2007 3,060,088,213 0.3673 15.78% N/A 231 Certified Taxable Assessed Valuation By Class of Property Class of Property Assessed Value % Residential Single Family 1,964,198,975 68.04% Multi Family 116,756,358 4.04% Total Residential 2,080,955,333 Commercial 668,860,708 23.17% Personal Property, Other 136,821,317 4.74% 2006 Certified Assessed Valuation 2,886,637,358 100% 70% of uncertified under protest value 173,450,855 2006 Total Assessed Valuation 3,060,088,213 Single Family 68% Multi Family 4% Commercial 23% Personal Property, Other 5% 232 City Property Tax Rate Comparison (Cities within the Central Texas Area) $0.70 Killeen (.6950) Belton (.6750) Pflugerville (.6300) .60 Temple (.5734)Leander (.59829) .50 Cedar Park (.52387) San Marcos (.4702) Austin (.4066).40 New Braunfels (.4090) Round Rock (.37105) Georgetown (.36728) .30 $0.20 500100150200250300350400 City of Georgetown $2.4919 Williamson County ($0.49970) City of Georgetown ($0.36728) $0 Georgetown Independent School District ($1.63) Combined Tax Rate 233 Total Combined Tax Rate Comparison (Cities within the Central Texas Area) Combined Monthly Rates (Utilities and Total Taxes on a $179,064 home) $581 $601 $640 $652 $567 $679 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 GEORGETOWN Austin Cedar Park Round Rock Leander Pflugerville Combined Tax Rates $0.00 $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 $3.00 $3.50 GEORGETOWN Round Rock Austin Temple Cedar Park Leander Pflugerville City School Community College Hospital County & Road 234 Sales Tax Revenue Analysis Ten Year History (Includes 1% general use only) Sales Tax per Capita (1%) $89.99 $94.72 $108.28 $112.55 $113.63 $100.77 $105.44 $116.01 $126.05 $135.93 $136.46 $1.33 $10.33 $10.15 $- $25 $50 $75 $100 $125 $150 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 *2006 *2007 Sales Tax Percent Change 50,754 426,900 14% 12% 18%20% 3% -2% 8% 13% 7% 16% 24% - 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 *2006 *2007 -5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% % c h a n g e f r o m p r i o r y e a r *Projected Revenues Wolf Ranch Wolf Ranch Impact Population Revenues Sales Tax per capita % change from prior year 1997 24,000 2,159,689 89.99 14% 1998 25,500 2,415,396 94.72 12% 1999 26,400 2,858,475 108.28 18% 2000 30,359 3,416,760 112.55 20% 2001 31,038 3,526,862 113.63 3% 2002 34,273 3,453,856 100.77 -2% 2003 35,300 3,721,898 105.44 8% 2004 36,359 4,217,991 116.01 13% 2005 38,265 4,874,132 127.38 16% *2006 41,294 6,061,700 146.79 24% *2007 44,324 6,475,000 146.08 7% 235 Sales Tax Revenue – By Quarter (Includes 1% general use only) 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 1,800,000 2,000,000 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 October - December January - March April - June July - September Sales in Quarter (1) October - December January - March April - June July - September Total by Year 1996 459,133 455,967 497,110 515,951 1,928,161 1997 541,436 491,475 543,930 571,368 2,148,209 1998 599,338 585,178 626,140 629,628 2,440,284 1999 666,584 682,519 758,914 747,348 2,855,365 2000 836,809 850,965 869,638 881,709 3,439,121 2001 868,966 862,427 925,473 892,376 3,549,243 2002 860,390 798,098 929,004 887,827 3,475,319 2003 890,929 846,901 973,750 1,026,751 3,738,331 2004 1,061,835 980,674 1,059,247 1,135,132 4,236,888 2005 1,142,982 1,146,133 1,237,437 1,347,580 4,874,132 2006 1,370,568 1,338,074 1,460,266 1,892,792 6,061,700 1) Note: The City receives sales tax collected through the state two months after the actual month of sales. This chart represents sales in the month indicated. 236 Tax Revenues Ten Year History Combined Revenue City Rate Value Rate Levy Tax Total 1997 2,159,689 7.25% 633,469,050 0.3800 2,407,182 4,566,871 1998 2,415,396 7.25% 984,123,199 0.3500 3,444,431 5,859,827 *1999 2,858,475 7.25% 1,199,831,232 0.3500 4,199,409 7,057,884 2000 3,416,760 7.25% 1,410,072,042 0.3400 4,794,245 8,211,005 2001 3,526,862 7.25% 1,629,344,909 0.3141 5,117,609 8,644,471 2002 3,453,856 7.75% 1,938,770,383 0.3071 5,953,576 9,407,432 2003 3,721,898 8.00% 2,116,042,131 0.3026 6,403,355 10,125,253 2004 4,217,991 8.00% 2,247,047,140 0.3219 7,233,245 11,451,236 2005 4,874,132 8.00% 2,391,137,407 0.3463 8,280,509 13,154,641 **2006 6,061,700 8.25% 2,643,057,606 0.3463 9,151,851 15,213,551 **2007 6,475,000 8.25% 3,060,088,213 0.3673 11,239,704 17,714,704 *13 months - change in accounting accrual methodology per Governmental Accounting Standards Board **Projected Fiscal Year Sales Tax Property Tax Combined Sales & Property Taxes Property Tax Sales Tax - 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000 16,000,000 18,000,000 1997 1998 *1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 **2006 237 38,265 41,294 44,324 36,359 30,359 35,300 26,40025,500 34,273 31,038 15,000 17,000 19,000 21,000 23,000 25,000 27,000 29,000 31,000 33,000 35,000 37,000 39,000 41,000 43,000 45,000 47,000 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 *2007 Population Georgetown’s Top Ten *Does not include some major property owners whose property is under protest as of date of certification. TAXPAYERS (per Certified Roll *) Assessed Taxpayer Value 1. SPG Wolf Ranch LP $54,533,897 2. Del Webb Texas LTD 21,472,843 3. Rivery Towne Crossing LP 16,082,723 4. Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust 15,396,720 5. HE Butt Grocery Company 13,379,262 6. Hewlett Holdings LTD 12,159,158 7. Watersedge - Georgetown LTD 11,280,732 8. Republic Square K/C LTD 11,217,641 9. Watersedge – Georgetown II LTD` 10,571,039 10. Verizon Southwest 10,535,640 EMPLOYERS Number of Employer Employees 1. Georgetown ISD 1,420 2. Williamson County 1,300 3. St. Davids Hospital 600 4. Southwestern University 583 5. HEB 477 6. City of Georgetown 453 7. WalMart 306 8. Sun City Texas 240 9. Wesleyan Homes 240 10. Airborn 230 TEN LARGEST WATER CUSTOMERS 000 Gallons Customer Consumed 1. Chisholm Trail SUD 598,401 2. Sun City Neighborhood Assn 309,077 3. Southwestern University 105,896 4. City of Georgetown 55,885 5. Rivery Town Crossing 43,893 6. Southwest Material 42,682 7. Georgetown ISD 39,224 8. Jonah Water SUD 34,747 9. Georgetown Place Apts 21,790 10. Simon Property Group 18,516 TEN LARGEST WASTEWATER CUSTOMERS Customer Volume 1. Southwestern University 45,897 2. Georgetown ISD 26,169 3. Georgetown Place Apts 20,349 4. Housing Authority 17,040 5. Georgetown Health Care System 15,049 6. Indian Creek Apts 14,581 7. Wesleyan Homes 13,669 8. The Oaks of Georgetown 12,976 9. Williamson County 11,090 10. San Gabriel Apartments 8,811 * Projected 238 Utility Customer Growth Ten Year History Fiscal Year Water Electric Wastewater Sanitation Stormwater 1997 10,173 10,811 8,100 8,855 8,594 1998 11,035 11,718 8,887 9,619 9,392 1999 11,573 12,413 9,519 10,350 9,945 2000 12,652 13,482 10,450 11,101 10,797 2001 13,518 14,269 11,338 11,980 11,532 2002 14,198 15,153 11,972 12,641 12,120 2003 14,878 15,812 12,669 13,430 12,661 2004 15,630 16,356 13,454 13,987 13,357 2005 16,656 17,403 14,480 15,076 14,346 2006 17,979 18,549 15,811 16,240 15,686 *2007 19,340 19,953 17,008 17,469 16,873 *Projected Utility Customer Growth - 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 *2007 Water Electric Wastew ater Sanitation Stormwater 239 Utility Revenues Ten Year History Fiscal *Other Year Water Enterprise Wastewater Electric 1997 5,348,446 1,777,626 3,176,383 14,814,125 1998 6,472,229 2,147,375 3,396,930 17,033,314 1999 6,744,444 2,535,126 3,833,126 17,843,712 2000 8,011,206 2,767,295 4,379,611 20,790,680 2001 8,021,813 3,071,302 4,767,588 24,340,991 2002 8,986,464 3,399,065 4,649,485 23,412,202 2003 8,814,789 3,940,379 4,929,301 25,916,557 2004 8,809,185 4,202,064 5,425,274 29,199,618 2005 9,838,920 4,895,190 5,946,401 34,300,000 **2006 11,616,109 5,313,602 6,563,800 36,852,200 **2007 10,888,600 5,741,600 6,942,400 42,670,900 *Includes Stormwater and Sanitation **Projected Utility Revenues - 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000 30,000,000 35,000,000 40,000,000 45,000,000 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 **2006 **2007 Water *Other Enterprise Wastewater Electric