HomeMy WebLinkAbout14-StatisticalStatistical
Statistical Table of Contents
City of Georgetown 3 Year Benchmarking Comparison......................................................................213
Peer Benchmarking.............................................................................................................................214
Financial Ratio Comparisons ..............................................................................................................216
Certified Property Value......................................................................................................................218
Certified Taxable Assessed Values.....................................................................................................219
Tax Rates
Property Tax Rate Comparison..............................................................................................220
Combined Tax Rate – City of Georgetown.............................................................................220
Total Combined Tax Rate Comparison..................................................................................221
Sales Tax Revenue Analysis...............................................................................................................222
Sales Tax Revenue by Quarter...........................................................................................................223
Tax Revenues
Ten Year History ...................................................................................................................224
Combined Sales and Property Taxes.....................................................................................224
Population ...........................................................................................................................................225
Georgetown’s Top Ten........................................................................................................................225
Utility Customer Growth ......................................................................................................................226
Utility Revenues ..................................................................................................................................227
Miscellaneous Statistical Data.............................................................................................................228
213
City of Georgetown
Three Year Benchmarking Comparison
Key Indicators 2003/2004 2004/2005 2005/2006 2004/2005
vs
2005/2006
Population 36,359 38,265 41,294 7.92%
Area (Square Miles) 24.47 25.73 26.51 3.03%
General Fund Budget $19,366,090 $20,702,198 $23,868,920 15.30%
Sales Tax Collections $4,172,000 $4,300,000 $6,076,600 41.32%
Sales Tax Per Capita $114.74 $112.37 $147.15 30.95%
Current Tax Base $2,247,047,140 $2,391,137,407 $2,643,057,606 10.54%
Average Residential Value $159,271 $163,751 $166,458 1.65%
Adopted City Tax Rate $0.32194 $0.34626 $0.34626 0.00%
Effective Tax Rate $0.31277 $0.319736 $0.31326 -2.03%
Rollback Tax Rate $0.32685 $0.35119 $0.35914 2.26%
Operations & Maintenance $0.22177 $0.23294 $0.20713 -11.08%
Debt Service $0.10017 $0.11332 $0.13913 22.78%
214
Peer Benchmarking
An important way to measure our economic condition is through benchmarking, which is a point of reference from
which measurements or progress can be made. Benchmarking measures our progress from a point in time and is
something that serves as a standard by which others may be measured. Benchmarking data is taken from
2004/05 budgets.
Population
84,200
57,295
44,769
36,087
29,931
38,265
103,210
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
K i l l e e n
Ro
u nd
R
o ck
T em
p
l
e
S an
Ma
r
c
o
s
Ge
o
r
g
et o w n
C e da
r
P a r k
Pfl
ug
erv
i
l l e
Employees Per Capita
10.31 10.27
8.63 8.31
6.65
11.67
8.38
-
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
T em
p l e
Ge
o
r
g
e
t
ow
n*
Sa
n
M a r co
s
*
R ou
n
d R oc
k
Kil
l
e en
C ed
a
r P ar k
Pf l u ge
r
v
ill e
Sales Tax Per Capita
$435
$279
$213
$149
$112
$40$54
-
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500Round R ock San Marco s T em ple K illee n Georgetown C edar P ar k Pflugerville Ad Valorem Revenue Per Capita
$235
$173
$241
$295 $280
$216
$189
-
50
100
150
200
250
300
350Cedar P a rk Pflugerville Templ e Rou n d Rock Georget ow n San Mar c o s Ki l l een *Both Georgetown and San Marcos own and operate an electric
utility.
Benchmarking allows the City to focus on the relative level of comparison in key areas within the Central
Texas area and find ways to close gaps when indicated.
215
Peer Benchmarking
Georgetown has chosen to measure itself against cities in the surrounding area that have similar size, location or
growth issues and benchmarks. Benchmarking data is taken from 2004/05 budgets.
General Fund Expenditures Per Capita
$759 $728
$632
$541
$383
$503
$419
$0.0
$200.0
$400.0
$600.0
$800.0
$1,000.0 Temple Ro u n d Rock S an M arc o s Georgetown C edar Par k Kil l een P fluger v ille General Debt Per Capita
$1,542
$1,271
$1,157
$835
$484
$796
$543
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800Cedar Park Round Ro c k P f l uger vi lle San M ar cos T emple G eor g et own K i l l een Assessed Valuation
(in billions)
$2.31
$1.31
$2.39
$5.25
$2.69
$2.20
$1.80
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
R o un
d R
o
ck
Kil
l
e
e
n
G e org
e
t
o
w
n
Te
m
p
l
e
Ce
d
a
r
P
a
r
k
S a n Ma
r
c
o
s
Pfl
u ge
r
v
i
l l e
Assessed Valuation Per Capita
$43,839
$26,075
$60,991$62,489 $62,369
$40,280 $40,179
-
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
Ge
o
r ge
t o w n
R o un
d
R o ck
Ce
d
a
r P
a rk
P f l ug
e
r
v ille
T em
p
l
e
Sa
n
M
a
r
c os
K i ll e en
216
Financial Ratio Comparisons
Georgetown has chosen to measure its financial condition against cities in the surrounding area that have
similar size, location or growth issues. The acceptable levels referred to below are based on the City’s
Fiscal and Budgetary Policy.
Fund Balance to Equity ratio is a function of fund
balance to equity for governmental type funds
(General Fund, Special Revenue, etc.)
Working capital is the liquid reserve available to
meet uncertainties. It is a function of current assets
less current liabilities.
Current ratio and quick ratio are measures of liquidity. Liquidity is an organization’s ability to convert
noncash assets into cash or to obtain cash to meet impending obligations. Current ratio includes inventories
and prepaid expenses, whereas the quick ratio excludes inventories and prepaid expenditures. A ratio of 1
or greater is an acceptable level for both ratios.
Fund Balance to Equity Ratio
2.03
0.54 0.49
0.090.17
0.46
-
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
K i l l e e n
S a n M a r c o s T e m p l e
R o u n d R o c k
G e o r g e t o w n
C e d a r P a r k
Working Capital
(in millions)
$143.1
$34.4 $27.8 $26.4 $19.5 $19.4
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
$180
R o u n d R o c k
T e m p l e
S a n M a r c o s K i l l e e n
G e o r g e t o w n
C e d a r P a r k
Current Ratio
34.68
13.79 12.44 11.59
7.37 6.84
-
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
R o u n d R o c k
T e m p l e
G e o r g e t o w n
C e d a r P a r k
S a n M a r c o s K i l l e e n
Quick Ratio
15.05
12.17 11.58 11.58
9.23
6.04
-
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
R o u n d R o c k
G e o r g e t o w n
C e d a r P a r k
S a n M a r c o s
T e m p l e K i l l e e n
217
Financial Ratio Comparisons
Financial ratios provide meaningful data and help identify major trends in the City’s financial condition and
in comparison to surrounding communities. Financial ratio data is taken from 2003/04 Comprehensive
Annual Financial Reports.
Debt due to assessed value is a ratio of the
assessed value to tax supported debt. A ratio of
less than 5 is acceptable.
The ratio of current liabilities plus long term debt
to total assets. A ratio of 1 or lower is accept-
able.
Number of times the utility debt service
requirements would be covered by the current
utility operating revenue net of current operating
expense. A ratio of 1.5 or greater is acceptable.
Enterprise operational coverage is a ratio of
operating revenue to operating expenses of the
City’s combined enterprise funds. A ratio of 1.25
or greater is acceptable.
Debt to Assessed Value
2.82%
1.56%1.42%
2.62%
1.82%
3.21%
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.00%
3.50%
4.00%
R o u n d R o c k
C e d a r P a r k
T e m p l e
S a n M a r c o s
G e o r g e t o w n K i l l e e n
Debt Ratio
0.22
0.35
0.43
0.560.59
0.71
-
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
K i l l e e n
C e d a r P a r k
T e m p l e
S a n M a r c o s
R o u n d R o c k
G e o r g e t o w n
Enterprise Operational Coverage
2.46
1.73 1.67 1.54
1.34 1.23
-
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
C e d a r P a r k
T e m p l e K i l l e e n
R o u n d R o c k
G e o r g e t o w n
S a n M a r c o s
Times Coverage Ratio
0.74
1.57
2.332.79
4.12
6.99
-
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
R o u n d R o c k K i l l e e n
G e o r g e t o w n
C e d a r P a r k
S a n M a r c o s
T e m p l e
218
Certified Property Value
Ten Year History
Fiscal Certified Tax Increase (Dec) Percent of
Year Assessed Value Rate In Value Levy Collected
1996 538,947,506 0.3700 11.63% 97.67%
1997 633,469,050 0.3800 17.54% 98.22%
1998 984,123,199 0.3500 55.35% 98.60%
1999 1,199,831,232 0.3500 21.92% 98.80%
2000 1,410,072,042 0.3400 17.52% 95.43%
2001 1,629,344,909 0.3141 15.55% 98.75%
2002 1,938,770,383 0.3071 18.99% 98.53%
2003 2,116,042,131 0.3026 9.14% 98.61%
2004 2,247,047,140 0.3219 6.19% 98.72%
2005 2,391,137,407 0.3463 6.41% 98.89%
2006 2,643,057,606 0.3463 10.54% N/A
-
500,000,000
1,000,000,000
1,500,000,000
2,000,000,000
2,500,000,000
3,000,000,000
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Ce
r
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
V
a
l
u
e
0.3000
0.3100
0.3200
0.3300
0.3400
0.3500
0.3600
0.3700
0.3800
0.3900
0.4000
T
a
x
R
a
t
e
s
219
Certified Taxable Assessed Valuation
By Class of Property
Class of Property Assessed Value %
Residential
Single Family 1,706,278,195 67.59%
Multi Family 113,057,489 4.48%
Total Residential 1,819,335,684
Commercial 547,763,460 21.70%
Personal Property, Other 157,265,408 6.23%
2005 Certified Assessed Valuation 2,524,364,552 100%
70% of uncertified under protest value 118,693,054
2005 Total Assessed Valuation 2,643,057,606
Single Family
68%
Multi Family
4%
Commercial
22%
Personal
Property, Other
6%
220
City Property Tax Rate Comparison
(Cities within the Central Texas Area)
City of Georgetown
$2.5759
Williamson
County
(.49970)
City of
Georgetown
(.34626)
$0
Georgetown
Independent
School District
($1.73)
Combined Tax Rate
.70
Killeen (.6950)
Belton (.6750)
Pflugerville (.6350)
.60
Temple (.5745)
Leander (.548291)
Cedar Park (.51807).50
San Marcos (.4702)
Austin (.4430)
.40
Round Rock (.37105)
Georgetown (.34626)
.30
.20
500100150200250300350400
221
Total Combined Tax Rate Comparison
(Cities within the Central Texas Area)
Combined Tax Rates
$0.000 $0.500 $1.000 $1.500 $2.000 $2.500 $3.000 $3.500
GEORGETOWN
Round Rock
Austin
Temple
Cedar Park
Leander
Pflugerville
City School Community College Hospital County & Road
Combined Monthly Rates
(Utilities and Total Taxes on a $166,458 home)
$565
$573
$589
$632
$551
$646
$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700
GEORGETOWN
Austin
Round Rock
Cedar Park
Leander
Pflugerville
222
Sales Tax Revenue Analysis
Ten Year History
(Includes 1% general use only)
Population Revenues
Sales Tax
per capita
% change from
prior year
1996 20,300 1,896,310 93.41 17%
1997 24,000 2,159,689 89.99 14%
1998 25,500 2,415,396 94.72 12%
1999 26,400 2,858,475 108.28 18%
2000 30,359 3,416,760 112.55 20%
2001 31,038 3,526,862 113.63 3%
2002 34,273 3,453,856 100.77 -2%
2003 35,300 3,721,898 105.44 8%
2004 36,359 4,217,991 116.01 13%
*2005 38,265 4,750,000 124.13 13%
*2006 41,294 6,076,600 147.15 28%
Sales Tax Percent Change
17%
14%
12%
18%20%
3%
-2%
8%
28%
13%
13%
-
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 *2005 *2006
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
%
c
h
a
n
g
e
f
r
o
m
p
r
i
o
r
y
e
a
r
*Projected Revenues
Sales Tax per Capita (1%)
$93.41
$89.99
$94.72
$108.28
$112.55
$113.63
$100.77
$105.44
$116.01
$124.13
$130.77 $16.38
$- $25 $50 $75 $100 $125 $150
19 9 6
1 997
19 9 8
19 9 9
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
*2005
*2006
Wolf Ranch
Wolf Ranch Impact
223
Sales Tax Revenue – By Quarter
(Includes 1% general use only)
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000
1,100,000
1,200,000
1,300,000
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
October - December January - March April - June July - September
Sales in
Quarter (1)
October -
December
January -
March
April -
June
July -
September
Total by
Year
1995 445,573 359,092 394,446 429,289 1,628,400
1996 459,133 455,967 497,110 515,951 1,928,161
1997 541,436 491,475 543,930 571,368 2,148,209
1998 599,338 585,178 626,140 629,628 2,440,284
1999 666,584 682,519 758,914 747,348 2,855,365
2000 836,809 850,965 869,638 881,709 3,439,121
2001 868,966 862,427 925,473 892,376 3,549,243
2002 860,390 798,098 929,004 887,827 3,475,319
2003 890,929 846,901 973,750 1,026,751 3,738,331
2004 1,061,835 980,674 1,059,247 1,135,132 4,236,888
2005 1,142,982 1,146,133 1,237,437 1,223,448 4,750,000
1) Note: The City receives sales tax collected through the state two months after the actual month of sales. This chart represents sales in the month indicated.
224
Tax Revenues
Ten Year History
Combined
Revenue City Rate Value Rate Levy Tax Total
1996 1,896,310 7.25% 538,947,506 0.3700 1,994,106 3,890,416
1997 2,159,689 7.25% 633,469,050 0.3800 2,407,182 4,566,871
1998 2,415,396 7.25% 984,123,199 0.3500 3,444,431 5,859,827
*1999 2,858,475 7.25% 1,199,831,232 0.3500 4,199,409 7,057,884
2000 3,416,760 7.25% 1,410,072,042 0.3400 4,794,245 8,211,005
2001 3,526,862 7.25% 1,629,344,909 0.3141 5,117,609 8,644,471
2002 3,453,856 7.75% 1,938,770,383 0.3071 5,953,576 9,407,432
2003 3,721,898 8.00% 2,116,042,131 0.3026 6,403,355 10,125,253
2004 4,217,991 8.00% 2,247,047,140 0.3219 7,233,245 11,451,236
**2005 4,750,000 8.00% 2,391,137,407 0.3463 8,280,509 13,030,509
**2006 6,076,600 8.25% 2,643,057,606 0.3463 9,151,851 15,228,451
*13 months - change in accounting accrual methodology per Governmental Accounting Standards Board
**Projected
Fiscal Year Sales Tax Property Tax
Combined Sales & Property Taxes
Property Tax
Sales Tax
-
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
16,000,000
1996 1997 1998 *1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 **2005 **2006
225
36,359
38,265
41,294
35,300
26,400
34,273
25,500
24,000
31,038
30,359
15,000
17,000
19,000
21,000
23,000
25,000
27,000
29,000
31,000
33,000
35,000
37,000
39,000
41,000
43,000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 *2006
Population
Georgetown’s Top Ten
*Does not include some major property owners whose
property is under protest as of date of certification.
TAXPAYERS
(per Certified Roll *)
Assessed
Taxpayer Value
1. Del Webb Texas LTD $16,709,092
2. SPG Wolf Ranch LP 15,683,108
3. Verizon Southwest 15,156,864
4. Wal-Mart Real Estate 13,458,930
5. KH-Georgetown Partners LTD 10,562,159
6. Rivery Towne Crossing LP 10,428,931
7. HE Butt Grocery Company 10,063,953
8. Rivery Partners LTD 9,919,492
9. Hewlett Holdings LTD 8,867,150
10. Mac Haik Ford Lincoln Mercury 8,761,920
EMPLOYERS
Number of
Employer Employees
1. Georgetown ISD 1,420
2. Williamson County 1,300
3. Georgetown Healthcare System 600
4. City of Georgetown 418
5. Southwestern University 410
6. Wesleyan Homes 256
7. Manitex 175
8. Texas Crushed Stone 175
9. Chatsworth Products 100
10. Texas Electric Cooperatives 75
TEN LARGEST WATER CUSTOMERS
000 Gallons
Customer Consumed
1. Sun City Association 215,039
2. Chisholm Trail SUD 184,053
3. Southwestern University 72,748
4. City of Georgetown 36,011
5. Georgetown ISD 31,311
6. Rivery Towne Crossing 30,942
7. Georgetown Country Club 19,209
8. Indian Creek Apartments 15,309
9. Housing Authority 14,110
10. The Oaks of Georgetown 13,793
TEN LARGEST WASTEWATER CUSTOMERS
Customer Volume
1. Southwestern University 35,688
2. Georgetown ISD 23,215
3. Indian Creek Apartments 15,188
4. Housing Authority 14,118
5. Georgetown Hospital 13,861
6. Wesleyan Homes 12,400
7. Georgetown Place Apartments 12,325
8. The Oaks of Georgetown 11,240
9. Georgetown Park Apartments 9,520
10. San Gabriel Apartments 9,451
* Projected
226
Utility Customer Growth
Ten Year History
Utility Customer Growth
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 *2005 *2006
Water Electric Wastew ater Sanitation Stormwater
Fiscal
Year Water Electric Wastewater Sanitation Stormwater
1996 9,192 9,678 7,084 7,397 7,098
1997 10,173 10,811 8,100 8,855 8,594
1998 11,035 11,718 8,887 9,619 9,392
1999 11,573 12,413 9,519 10,350 9,945
2000 12,652 13,482 10,450 11,101 10,797
2001 13,518 14,269 11,338 11,980 11,532
2002 14,198 15,153 11,972 12,641 12,120
2003 14,878 15,812 12,669 13,430 12,661
2004 15,630 16,356 13,454 13,987 13,357
2005 16,656 17,403 14,480 15,076 14,346
*2006 17,182 17,953 14,938 15,552 14,799
*Projected
227
Utility Revenues
Ten Year History
Fiscal *Other
Year Water Enterprise Wastewater Electric
1996 5,826,471 1,528,541 3,159,357 14,010,520
1997 5,348,446 1,777,626 3,176,383 14,814,125
1998 6,472,229 2,147,375 3,396,930 17,033,314
1999 6,744,444 2,535,126 3,833,126 17,843,712
2000 8,011,206 2,767,295 4,379,611 20,790,680
2001 8,021,813 3,071,302 4,767,588 24,340,991
2002 8,986,464 3,399,065 4,649,485 23,412,202
2003 8,814,789 3,940,379 4,929,301 25,916,557
2004 8,809,185 4,202,064 5,425,274 29,199,618
**2005 9,050,000 4,664,510 5,910,360 33,000,000
**2006 10,236,000 4,883,190 6,347,530 34,300,000
*Includes Stormwater and Sanitation
**Projected
Utility Revenues
- 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000 30,000,000 35,000,000
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
**2005
**2006
Water *Other Enterprise Wastewater Electric
228
Miscellaneous Statistical Data
Form of government Council - Manager
Area 26.51
Miles of streets 422
Number of street lights 2,589
2004 average unemployment rate 4.20%
Total City employees 418.75
Number of parks 23
Acres of parks 380
Number of libraries 1
Number of library items in circulation 350,716
Number of Fire stations 4
Number of Firefighters 56
Number of Police stations 1
Number of Police officers 64
Number of Electric customers 17,403
Number of Water customers 16,656
Number of Wastewater customers 14,480
Number of Sanitation customers 15,076
Number of GISD Attendance Centers 15
# of Teachers 668
Average Years Experience 12
Student/Teacher Ratio 12.7
Total Number of Students 8,902
African-American 3.7%
Hispanic 29.0%
White 66.0%
Economically Disadvantaged 34.0%
Elevation 750 feet
Annual Average Temperature 68o
Monthly Average High Temperature 96o
Monthly Average Low Temperature 39o
Weather
Education
Utility Customers
Public Safety
Recreation and Culture
General City Information