HomeMy WebLinkAbout17- Statistical-pp-273-290Statistical
Statistical Table of Contents
Miscellaneous Statistical Data ............................................................................................................. 275 Key Indicators. ..................................................................................................................................... 276
Benchmarking .................................................................................................................................... 278
Certified Property Value ...................................................................................................................... 280
Certified Taxable Assessed Values .................................................................................................... 281
Tax Rates Property Tax Rate Comparison .............................................................................................. 282
Combined Tax Rate – City of Georgetown ............................................................................ 282
Total Combined Tax Rate Comparison .................................................................................. 283
Sales Tax Revenue Analysis ............................................................................................................... 284
Tax Revenues
Historical Data ....................................................................................................................... 285
Combined Sales and Property Taxes .................................................................................... 285 Additional Sales and Use Taxes (Whole 2%) .......................................................................... 286
Utility Customer Growth ...................................................................................................................... 287 Utility Revenues .................................................................................................................................. 288
Population ........................................................................................................................................... 289
Georgetown’s Top Ten ........................................................................................................................ 289
275
Miscellaneous Statistical Data
Form of government Council - Manager
Area (square miles)50.25
Miles of streets 630
Number of street lights 3,582
2010 average unemployment rate 7.08%
Total City employees 531.25
Number of parks 34
Acres of parkland (Master Plan now includes green space as parkland)865
Number of libraries 1
Number of library items in circulation 527,746
Number of Fire stations 4
Number of Firefighters 84
Number of Police stations 1
Number of Police officers 76
Number of Electric customers 21,475
Number of Water customers 21,173
Number of Wastewater customers 18,936
Number of Stormwater Customers 18,516
Number of Sanitation customers 20,232
Number of GISD Attendance Centers 17
# of Teachers 821
Average Years Experience 12
Student/Teacher Ratio 11
Total Number of Students 10,470
African-American 4.4%
Hispanic 34.9%
White 58.7%
Economically Disadvantaged 42.8%
Elevation 755 feet
Annual Average Temperature 68o
Monthly Average High Temperature 96o
Monthly Average Low Temperature 39o
Weather
Education
Utility Customers
Public Safety
Recreation and Culture
General City Information
276
Key Indicators
277
Key Indicators
278
Peer Benchmarking
An important way to measure our economic condition is through benchmarking, which is a point of reference from which measurements or progress can be made. Benchmarking measures our progress from a point in time and is
something that serves as a standard by which others may be measured. Benchmarking data is taken from 2010/11 budgets.
*Both Georgetown and San Marcos own and
operate an electric utility.
279
Benchmarking allows the City to focus on the relative level of comparison in key areas within the Central Texas area and find ways to close gaps when indicated.
Peer Benchmarking
Georgetown has chosen to measure itself against cities in the surrounding area that have similar size, location or growth issues and benchmarks. Benchmarking data is taken from 2010/11 budgets.
280
Certified Property Value
Historical Data
Fiscal Certified Tax Increase (Dec)Percent of
Year Assessed Value Rate In Value Levy Collected
2002 1,938,770,383 0.3071 18.99%98.53%
2003 2,116,042,131 0.3026 9.14%98.61%
2004 2,247,047,140 0.3219 6.19%98.72%
2005 2,391,137,407 0.3463 6.41%98.89%
2006 2,643,057,606 0.3463 10.54%98.94%
2007 3,060,088,213 0.3673 15.78%99.28%
2008 3,700,498,187 0.3566 20.93%98.24%
2009 4,176,836,943 0.3562 12.87%98.05%
2010 4,173,874,126 0.3562 -0.07%98.41%
2011 4,180,224,985 0.3562 0.15%99.22%
2012 4,318,148,209 0.3875 3.30%N/A
281
Certified Taxable Assessed Valuation
By Class of Property
282
City Property Tax Rate Comparison
(Cities within the Central Texas Area)
$0.80 Taylor (.815340)
Killeen (.7428)
.70
Leander (.67042)
Pflugerville (.5990)
Temple (.5679)
San Marcos (.5302)
Hutto (.50758).50
Austin (.46130)
.40
Georgetown (.3875)
$0.30 .30
.60
Round Rock (.42321)
Cedar Park (.49350)
City of Georgetown
$2.20319
$0
Georgetown
Independent
School District
($1.358)
Combined Tax Rate
City of
Georgetown
($0.3875)
Williamson
County
($0.45769)
283
Total Combined Tax Rate Comparison
(Cities within the Central Texas Area)
284
Sales Tax Revenue Analysis
Historical Data
(Includes 1% general use only)
Fiscal
Year Population Revenues
Sales Tax per
capita
% change from
prior year
2002 33,418 3,453,856 103.35 -2%
2003 34,855 3,721,898 106.78 8%
2004 36,309 4,217,991 116.17 13%
2005 38,438 4,874,132 126.81 16%
2006 41,395 6,056,507 146.31 24%
2007 44,117 6,761,872 153.27 12%
2008 45,710 7,310,027 159.92 8%
2009 46,787 6,943,036 148.40 -5%
2010 47,865 7,454,806 155.75 7%
*2011 48,902 8,297,000 169.67 11%
*2012 49,825 8,375,000 168.09 1%
285
Tax Revenues
Historical Data
Combined
Revenue City Rate Value Rate Levy Tax Total
2002 3,453,856 7.75%1,938,770,383 0.3071 5,953,576 9,407,432
2003 3,721,898 8.00%2,116,042,131 0.3026 6,403,355 10,125,253
2004 4,217,991 8.00%2,247,047,140 0.3219 7,233,245 11,451,236
2005 4,874,132 8.00%2,391,137,407 0.3463 8,280,509 13,154,641
2006 6,056,507 8.25%2,643,057,606 0.3463 9,151,851 15,208,358
2007 6,761,872 8.25%3,060,088,213 0.3673 11,239,704 18,001,576
2008 7,310,027 8.25%3,700,498,187 0.3566 13,195,606 20,505,633
2009 6,943,036 8.25%4,176,836,943 0.3562 14,877,893 21,820,929
2010 7,454,806 8.25%4,173,874,126 0.3562 14,867,340 22,322,146
**2011 8,297,000 8.25%4,180,224,985 0.3562 14,889,961 23,186,961
**2012 8,375,000 8.25%4,318,148,209 0.3875 16,732,824 25,107,824
*13 months - change in accounting accrual methodology per Governmental Accounting Standards Board
**Projected
Fiscal Year Sales Tax Property Tax
286
Additional Sales and Use Taxes
Whole 2%
In 2001, voters authorized the adoption of an additional 0.5% sales and use tax within the City, with the proceeds to be used for transportation system improvements to support economic development. The additional revenue is
not part of the City’s general operating budget, but is budgeted and spent by a non-profit economic development
corporation, Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation (GTEC). GTEC was established expressly
for the above purpose by the City Council. GTEC’s activities are included in the City’s audited financial statements as a blended component unit. A copy of GTEC’s approved 2011/12 budget is included within the
reference section of this document.
In November 2002, voters authorized the adoption of an additional 0.25% sales and use tax within the City with the proceeds to be used for maintenance of streets in existence at the time of the adoption of the tax. This
revenue is included in the City’s operating budget in a Special Revenue Fund. This tax has a four year sunset provision, and was reauthorized by the voters in November 2006 and November 2010. Currently, this tax will
sunset in April 2015, unless renewed by the voters in November 2014.
In May 2005, voters authorized the adoption of an additional 0.125% sales and use tax within the City with the proceeds to be used to promote and develop new and expanded business enterprise on behalf of the City of
Georgetown and became effective October 1, 2005. This additional revenue is not part of the City’s operating budget, and is budgeted and spent by a non-profit economic development corporation, Georgetown Economic
Development Corporation (GEDCO). This corporation was established by the City Council to oversee this revenue. Activities are included in the City’s audited financial statements as a discretely presented component
unit. A copy of GEDCO’s approved 2011/12 budget is also included within the reference section of this document.
In May 2005, voters also authorized the adoption of an additional 0.125% sales and use tax within the City with
the proceeds to be used for property tax relief. This tax became effective October 1, 2005 and is used in the City’s 2011/12 property tax calculation. Revenue from this sales tax is included in the City’s general operating
budget.
287
Utility Customer Growth
Historical Data
Fiscal Year Water Electric Wastewater Sanitation Stormwater
2000 12,652 13,482 10,450 11,101 10,797
2001 13,518 14,269 11,338 11,980 11,532
2002 14,198 15,153 11,972 12,641 12,120
2003 14,686 15,643 12,501 13,218 12,661
2004 15,630 16,356 13,454 13,987 13,357
2005 16,656 17,403 14,480 15,076 14,346
2006 17,979 18,549 15,811 16,240 15,686
2007 18,847 19,554 16,672 17,359 16,535
2008 19,727 20,414 17,518 18,590 17,299
2009 20,151 20,639 17,912 19,109 17,606
2010 20,643 21,071 18,413 19,719 18,127
2011 21,173 21,475 18,936 20,232 18,516
*2012 21,385 21,690 19,125 20,434 18,701
* Projected
288
Utility Revenues
Historical Data
Fiscal Yr Water
* Other
Enterprise Wastewater Electric
2002 8,986,464 3,399,065 4,649,485 23,412,202
2003 8,814,789 3,940,379 5,096,052 25,916,557
2004 8,809,185 4,202,064 5,425,274 29,199,618
2005 9,838,920 4,702,317 5,946,401 33,802,583
2006 11,916,401 5,091,527 6,512,974 41,338,196
2007 10,345,351 5,461,743 7,146,132 42,805,466
2008 13,602,151 6,136,057 7,760,011 51,833,477
2009 13,757,785 6,575,514 7,992,122 56,506,906
2010 12,523,363 6,754,003 8,109,241 59,058,745
**2011 14,724,000 6,822,151 8,361,382 55,236,673
**2012 14,401,320 7,269,421 8,471,907 61,527,544
* Includes Stormwater and Sanitation
** Projected
289
Georgetown’s Top Ten
TAXPAYERS (per Certified Roll *) Assessed
Taxpayer Value 1. SPG Wolf Ranch LP $55,874,164 2. St David’s Healthcare Partnership $41,949,819 3. Citicorp North America Inc $41,714,222
4. The Bassham Trust $23,620,874 5. Citicorp North America Inc 3375 $22,530,014 6. South Austin Ave Professional Bldg $18,086,744 7. Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust $16,241,376 8. Del Webb Texas Ltd $12,859,498
9. Republic Square K/C Ltd $12,500,000 10. Hewlett Holdings, Ltd $12,059,642
EMPLOYERS
Number of Employer Employees 1. Georgetown ISD 1,716
2. Williamson County Government 1,500 3. Airborn, Inc 550 4. City of Georgetown 531 5. Southwestern University 507 6. St. David’s Hospital 441 7. Wesleyan Homes, Inc 301 8. Caring Home Health 269 9. Sun City (Del Webb) 260 10. Home Depot 249
TEN LARGEST WATER CUSTOMERS * 000 Gallons Customer Consumed
1. Chisholm Trail SUD 925,734 2. Sun City Neighborhood Assoc 460,312 3. Southwestern University 115,092 4. City of Georgetown 91,908 5. Southwest Materials 42,862
6. GeorgetownISD 41,920 7. Williamson County 33,335 8. CitiCorp 28,778 9. Simon Property Group 20,368 10. Parkside @ Mayfield Ranch Ltd 18,537
TEN LARGEST WASTEWATER CUSTOMERS Customer Volume
1. Southwestern University 28,461 2. Georgetown ISD 27,140 3. Williamson County 24,616 4. CitiCorp 19,783
5. Indian Creek Apartments 16,981 6. Oaks of Georgetown 16,793 7. Waters Edge 14,877 8. City of Georgetown 11,847 9. Simon Property Group 9,257
10. Georgetown Hospital 9,150
* Includes potable water only. Non-potable irrigation is not included in total gallons consumed.
* Does not include some major property owners whose
property is under protest as of date of certification.
290
.