Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 11.22.2011 CC-RMinutes of the Meeting of the Governing Body of the City of Georgetown, Texas Tuesday, November 22, 2011 The City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, met in Regular Session on the above date with Mayor George Garver presiding. Council Present: Council Absent: Patty Eason, Danny Meigs, Bill Sattler, Pat All Council Present. Berryman, Tommy Gonzalez, Rachael Jonrowe, Troy Hellmann Staff Present: Paul E. Brandenburg, City Manager; Bridget Chapman, Acting City Attorney; Jim Briggs, Assistant City Manager; Jessica Brettle, City Secretary; Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer; Jim Briggs, Assistant City Manager; Rachel Saucier, Assistant City Secretary; Lorie Lankford, Controller; Terri Glasby Calhoun,', Real Estate Services Director; Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner; Glenn Dishong, Utilities Director; Kathy Ragsdale, Environmental and Conservation Services Director; Elizabeth Cook, Community Development Director; Wayne Nero, Police Chief; Mike Elabarger, Planner III; Terry Jones, Support Services Director; David Munk, Utility Engineer; Mark Miller, Transportation Services Director; Minutes Regular Session - To begin no earlier than 06:00 P (Council may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene an Executive Session at the request of the Mayor, a Councilmember, or the City Manager for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 551.) A Call to Order -- Mayor called the meeting to order at 6:13 PM Pledge of Allegiance Comments from the Mayor - Welcome and Meeting Procedures City Council Regional Board Reports -CAMPO Mayor spoke about the recent CAMPO meetings and how they have been having difficulties disbursing monies for projects. He described how they finally decided to allocate the dollars. - Lone Star Rail District Eason spoke about how the Lone Star Rail District benefited from the CAMPO funds. She said the district was awarded $10 million ($8 million federal, $2 million local match) for the environmental clearance work on the Urban Freight Rail Bypass. She said the Rail District is going to make a determination with the UP partners about a Surface Transportation Board filing this month, and begin that process if approved in the January or February time frame. She said the District going into procurement sometime in the late spring/early summer for a consultant to perform the environmental clearance work. This is a major hurdle cleared, as it allows the Lone Star Rail District to advance both sides of the project right up to final design and construction. City Manager Comments City Council Meeting Minutes/ Page 1 of 8 Pages Brandenburg introduced Richard Fields of McGuirre and Fields Engineers in Austin. He presented the City with a trophy in honor of the College Street Bridge project. Action from Executive Session Motion by Eason, second by Meigs to direct the City Attorney to file a lien against real property known as 2008 and 2008 112 Pine Street in the amount of $4,235.85 and further directing the City Attorney to release the lien to the amount of $2,823.90 if the property is sold or developed within 12 months. Approved 7-0 Public Wishing to Address Council On a subject that is posted on this agenda: Please fill out a speaker registration form which can be found on the table at the entrance to the Council Chamber. Clearly print your name and the letter of the item on which you wish to speak and present it to the City Secretary on the dais, preferably prior to the start of the meeting. You will be called forward to speak when the Council considers that item. On a subject not posted on thea agenda: Persons may add an item to a future City Council agenda by.contacting the City Secretary no later than noon on the Wednesday prior to the Tuesday meeting, with the subject matter of the topic they would like to address and their name. The City Secretary can be reached at 5121930-3651. B - Nick Ramos regarding a grant from the Arts and Culture Board and "Current: The Banner Project." Ramos introduced himself and said he is a local artist and small business owner and he said he would like to present Council with a catalog of the current banner project. He said he received a grant from the Arts and Culture Board to curate the second banner project. He said he wanted to create something that was different. He noted, instead of just having local artists, they had artists from all over the United States do work for the project. He said one of his beliefs as a resident is that art can make the quality of life better but noted it can also help the economic development of Georgetown. He said he really wanted to create something that was first class. He said he is here to present the Council with catalogs that any first class art exhibit should have. He thanked Council for giving him the opportunity to work on this effort for the City. The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non -controversial and routine items that Council may act on with one single vote. A councilmember may pull any item from the Consent Agenda in order that the council discuss and act upon it individually as part of the Regular Agenda. C Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes of the Workshop and Regular Council meeting held on Tuesday, November 8, 2011-- Jessica Brettle, City Secretary D Consideration and possible action to accept the City's Quarterly Financial Report, which includes the Investment Reports for the City of Georgetown, Georgetown Transportation Enhancement Corporation (GTEC), and the Georgetown Economic Development Corporation (GEDCO) for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 -- Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer and Lorie Lankford, Controller E Consideration and possible action to approve a Resolution authorizing the vacation and abandonment of a 20' public utility easement consisting of a 0.227 -acre parcel of land out of the Nicholas Porter Survey, Abstract No. 497, Williamson County, Texas and being fully described by metes and bounds and sketch in instrument recorded at Document No. 2003065808, Official Records of Williamson County, Texas; and authorizing the Mayor to execute a quitclaim deed and any other documentation necessary to effectuate such vacation and abandonment; and establishing an effective date. -- Terri Glasby Calhoun, Real Estate Services Coordinator, Glenn Dishong, Utilities Director F Consideration and possible authorization to release the last 11 houses to Alpha Builders for weatherization through the Weatherization & Home Improvement Program in the amount of $50,701.54 -- Kathy Ragsdale, Environmental & Conservation Services and Jim Briggs, Assistant City Manager Motion by Berryman, second by Meigs to approve the consent agenda in its entirety. Approved 7-0 Legislative Regular Agenda Council will individually consider and possibly take action on any or all of the following items: G Public Hearing for the voluntary annexation into the city limits of 0.33 acres, more or less, in the Clement Stubblefield Survey, located near the intersection of Wolf Ranch Parkway and West University Ave -- Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner and Elizabeth A. Cook, Community Development Director City Council Meeting Minutes/ Page 2 of 8 Pages Maddox described the item and said this is a second public hearing for a voluntary annexation petition staff received. He said this is anticipated as part of a lot that will be developed in the future. He said this also requires two ordinance readings. Public Hearing was opened 6:35 PM No persons were present to speak. Public Hearing closed at 6:35 PM H Public Hearing for the voluntary annexation into the city limits of 10.304 acres, more or less, in the William Roberts Survey, located at the intersection of Shell Road and Bellaire Drive -- Jordan J. Maddox, AICP, Principal Planner and Elizabeth A. Cook, Community Development Director Maddox said this is the second public hearing for the voluntary annexation of this property. He said this area is located within the Georgetown Village concept plan. Public Hearing was opened at 6:36 PM No persons were present to speak. Public Hearing was closed at 6:36 PM 1 Public Hearing and First Reading of an Ordinance Rezoning approximately 37.21 acres in the Stubblefield Survey, from the Residential Single -Family (RS) District, as recorded in Document Number 2009090679, to the General Commercial (C-3) and Local Commercial (C-1) Districts -- Mike Elabarger, Planner III and Elizabeth Cook, Community Development Director Elabarger introduced himself and showed Council a map of the request for rezoning. He said this area is located at the southeast corner of 1-35 and University Avenue. He showed Council an aerial view of the site. He said along 29 there is an electrical utility complex and a small retail center called copper ridge. He said the existing zoning of the property is RS- Residential. He described what the applicant is requesting in terms of rezoning to C-1 and C3 districts. He said they took this application to the Planing and Zoning Commission and added it was approved it 6-1. He said the applicant spoke at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting regarding the landowners access. He said there could be connectivity between the existing retail and this site but noted the applicant said he would prefer not to have connectivity. He said all of those decisions are to be made in the future and added staff would have to determine where the access to this property would be from. He said none of this is set in stone. He said there is staff here tonight if council has questions about transportation in the area. He said staff is in support of this application. Elabarger read only the caption of the Ordinance on first reading after having satisfied the requirements of the City Charter. Public Hearing was opened at 6:41 PM No persons were present to speak. Public Hearing was closed at 6:41 PM Motion by Hellmann, Berryman to approve the Ordinance on first reading. Jonrowe asked about the potential traffic impacts of this on University Avenue. She said there are people in her district that are already concerned about the traffic around the HEB. Berryman agreed with Jonrowe and added the solution may be to move the light at that intersection to a different location. She said there is a problem with the light at HEB and added the light should be back away from 35 and farther up 29. She noted this may be a good opportunity to add a light at this intersection. Polasek said there is two solutions to this intersection. Polasek said the light at HEB was a commission decision straight through TXDOT. He said moving the light would meet the separation requirements much better. Berryman said she would like to explore that option because she would like to address the mobility in that area. Polasek said that area consistently is on the Top 20 list for congestion in the TXDOT region. Sattler agreed with Berryman and said it is a terrible intersection. He noted, if you move that traffic light, it would it impede the traffic coming out of copper ridge. Polasek said if you move the light, there would have to be connectiivty. Sattler asked and Elabarger said there have been no site submittals for this area as of yet. . City Council Meeting Minutes/ Page 3 of 8 Pages Vote on the motion: Approved 7-0 J Discussion and possible action on recommendations from the Ethics Commission on amendments to the City's Ethics Ordinance and Hearing Procedures -- Walt Herbert, Chair, Ethics Commission Herbert brought forward the recommended changes from the Ethics Commission. He said a list of the proposed changes have been provided to the Council. He spoke about how serious the Ethics Commission takes these matters. He noted the Commission wants to make sure there are no ambiguities and uncertainties in this Ordinance and the Hearing Process. He gave one example of where the Commission made a change in order to take away any ambiguities in the complaint process. Brettle spoke about how these recommended changes, if approved, would be brought forward in an Ordinance making those changes official. Mayor asked and Herbert continued to describe the recommended changes to the Ethics Ordinance. Berryman spoke about the issue of the term properly filed being replaced by "received." She disagreed with that change. She said this is a serious matter and added someone going through the trouble filing a complaint should be held to a certain standard and there should be a filing standard. Berryman spoke about the term commanded be replaced by "requested" on a filing form. She said she feels the term needs to be more harsh than requested. Herbert asked and Mayor said the Council should concentrate on the Ordinance changes first and then Hearing Procedures. Jonrowe thanked Mr. Herbert and the Commission that has worked on this Ordinance. She said she appreciates the time and dedication that has been spent on this. Motion by Jonrowe, second by Berryman to approve the proposed changes to the Ethics Ordinance. Approved 7-0 Herbert spoke regarding the change to the term "properly filed" in the Hearing Procedures. He said it is certainly not their desire to regard this is a casual matter or to lighten the load on people bringing a complaint. He said they wished to make this language clear in the absence of any description of what is a "proper filing." He noted, after the complaints are received, the Commission goes through a considerable deliberation to determine whether or not that complaint is proper. He said there are no particular provisions that surround the moment of filing. He said the language of the hearing procedures refers to the receipt of a complaint. Berryman said the Commission needs to have some specifics much the way they do in a court of law. Berryman said she thinks the Commission needs to determine what "properly filed" means. She said she has a problem with the idea that anyone can come in with an accusation. She continued to describe her issues with the filing requirements. Herbert said there are standards that allow the Commission to make a distinction between what are valid complaints and what are not. Berryman said she believes the initial complaint should have requirements. Eason said she believes that the first section of the Ordinance called Initial Matters deals with the requirements a person must meet when filing. She noted she thinks all of Berryman's issues are defined and this is just a semantic matter. Herbert referred to a section in the Ordinance that lays out a detailed account of what needs to be brought before the Commission. He noted the act of filing is different than what is filed. Hellmann asked about adding the word "received" to the end and make it "properly filed and received." Herbert said it is good we are having the discussion now so that the question of what is property filed does not come up in the future. Hellmann asked what would happen if someone turned in a complaint that is incomplete. Herbert said the Ordinance addresses the fact that incomplete complaints would be thrown out. Meigs asked and Herbert said he is just referring to a time when the clock starts after a complaint is "properly filed." Sattler asked and Herbert said their Commission does not have the power to sanction anything or impose repercussions on anyone that files a frivolous complaint. Herbert described the rest of the recommended changes to the Hearing Procedures. He spoke about how the Commission takes this whole matter very seriously. He said if there is a hearing, at certain stage of the game, a party will feel it better to attack the process and make the City look like fools. Herbert said the Commission would like to avoid that. Berryman asked about the use of the term requested instead of commanded in the form. She suggested that Council use the term "required" instead. Eason agreed with Berryman about the word "required." Meigs said he thinks required is just as strong as commanded. He asked who is going to enforce that issue. Berryman said the failure of someone to follow the request would become part of the material in making the determination. Gonzalez asked if it is proper to asked the Commission to review some of these concerns based on the language or have a Workshop to discuss these recommendations. Herbert said he would much rather have the one word change done right now instead of convening the Commission. He said that would be asking a lot of his colleagues. Jonrowe asked if there is wording regarding if there are less than eight people on the Commission sometime in the future. Herbert said there may come a day where the Commission has more members but noted there are other things that will happen in the future that will require changes. He said members tend to be very faithful in attending the meetings but noted a majority of the people on the Commission should be required to act on something like this. He spoke about the rational that lies behind the number that is chosen. There was much discussion regarding the amount of people attending the City Council Meeting Minutes/ Page 4 of 8 Pages meetings and Commission attendance. Brettle spoke about how when the Commission meets again in March, they are required to review the Ordinance once more. Jonrowe said she thinks this is something that is very important and she noted it would be worth it to make this part of a Workshop the next time the Commission comes back with future recommendations. Berryman asked and Herbert said the Commission would love for people to attend their meetings. Motion by Berryman, second by Sattler to accept all of the revisions to the hearing procedures with the change that the word commanded be changed to required. Approved 7-0 K Consideration and possible action for the selection of a construction cost option for the Public Safety Operations and Training Facility -- Terry Jones, Support Services Director and Micki Rundell Chief Financial Officer Rundell provided a summary of what has been discussed regarding moving forward with the construction of the public safety facility. She said Council has asked staff to come back with Options 1, 2, or a hybrid phased in facility, to discuss costs. She said staff went back to match the sizing to the current needs. She spoke about Option 1 and how it is for the full facility at 70,000 square feet and up to $20 million. She noted this includes the tactical building and the furniture and fixtures. She said it has net operations of a little less than half of a cent. She said on a 20 year bond, the tax impact would be about 5 cents. She said, if the City did a 25 year bond which she would recommend, it is less than 5 cents and around 4.87. She described Option 1.5, which is a phased facility. She described how this would work. She said under this option they would build 54,225 sq ft. and build a shell of 15,775 sq ft. She said the cost of that is around $17,500. She said the total estimated tax impact of this option on a 20 year bond would be 4.64 cents or 4.17 cents on the recommended 25 year bond. She said these are conservative costs. She spoke about option two, a smaller facility with a total of 54,225 sq ft. She said the tax impact of that would 4.16 cents on a 20 year bond and 3.6 cents on a 25 year bond. She said the next steps are to determine the size option, determine the architectural selection committee and begin design work. She said everyone is here to answer questions Council may have. Mayor asked and Rundell reviewed and summarized the cost and the effect on the tax rate of each of the options. Gonzalez said he has looked at these options and noted, at this point, he will be supporting option for the full building. He said the difference in cost savings in minimal. He said, based on the total cost and it being voter approved, he does not think it is worth doing something less. He said it is better to give police and fire the facilities they deserve. Jonrowe asked what the chiefs think of options 1.5. Nero said he would take the position of Gonzalez' opinion. He said they can live with that but noted the 15,000 square feet of shell space is not in all one place. He noted it does not need to be finished out, but there will be a cost to that when it happens. He noted, operationally, it will not make a difference to them right now. He spoke about why he would prefer Option 1 to Option 1.5. Berryman said and Nero agreed that the police department would not be using the shell of the space. Berryman asked and Nero said the department would need to increase the use of the space incrementally over the course of a few years. Berryman asked about Option 1.5 and how the expansion would work with that option. Gonzalez said construction costs today are the lowest they have been in a long time and the realized savings may not be there if the City waits to finish the facility. Berryman said she disagrees with Gonzalez and she explained why that is so. Brandenburg said the square footage cost of a public safety facility as compared to a house is very different. Nero said the real question is if there is really going to be a cost savings in waiting to finish out the facility. Sattler asked and Rundell said the first phase of these bonds will be issued next year. She said the next phase will probably be 2013. She said market conditions will determine whether the City does two or three issues or more. She noted the full tax impact will probably be three years from now. Sattler asked and Nero spoke about how the shelled space would be used incrementally over time. Nero said all of that space would be pocketed in the different sections of the building. Sattler asked and staff said they do not know the schedule yet. Sattler spoke about his concerns. He said he is interested in either option one or option 1.5. Sattler said the cost between Options 1 and 1.5 is about $87,000 per year. Rundell said that is the differential between what they currently pay on their facilities and what they would pay for a new facility. There was much discussion on the cost difference between option one and option 1.5. Meigs said he appreciates staff putting these numbers together because when we left hear last meeting he said he was convinced that option 1.5 would be a significant savings. He noted it is now seen that that is not the case. He said he is willing to move forward with Option 1. Hellmann said he likes Option 1.5, but hearing that the space will not be contiguous, it will be hard to not heat or cool it or have lights for those spaces. He noted it would be hard to segregate it out. He said all of this is unknown until the architect starts to look at it. He said the architect can find ways to save the city money. He said he does know that now is the time to build buildings. He added construction costs and interest rates are at historic lows. He said he is trying to see if there is some sort of solution to mitigate the tax rate now. He said he leans to Option 1 or 1.5. Eason said she is agreeing with Gonzalez that she is just not seeing the benefit of choosing Option 1.5. She said she will only be repeating things that have already been said and added she is leaning toward Option 1. City Council Meeting Minutes/ Page 5 of 8 Pages Speaker, Ron Greene, said he was sitting in the audience listening to the Council debate this thing. He said he is happy this came down to between Options 1 and 1.5. He said he was reading the other day a document he hasn't seen in many years called the Constitution and added it starts off with "We the People." He said we the people, voted for this facility and knew it would be a higher tax. He said "we the people" want the facility. He said if he were, as a business man, looking at this plan he would definitely head toward Option 1 for a lot of reasons. He said what is today won't be tomorrow. He said we do not know what tomorrow will be. He said that space will end up getting used quick. He said if the space is there, we all know realistically that the department will find a good use for it. He said "we the people" would like for Council to go with Option 1. Speaker, Joe Pondrum, said he was the co-chair of the public safety complex task force. He said his son just got out of the construction industry because there is no money in it right now He said if you are going to build something, do it now, because things will not be getting better anytime soon. He said you can not estimate what your property tax value will be next year. He said we are at the rock bottom economically and we have no place to go but up. He said this nickel to the tax rate is based on property tax rate values right now. He said if the values go up, the tax rate goes down. He said the people in this town voted for a 70,000 sq ft building and $29 million to do it. He said the voters knew that the worst cast scenario would be a 5 cent tax increase. He said cops are like marines and, if they have the space, they will use it. Berryman asked and Jones spoke about how the operations and maintenance is cheaper on Option 1.5 because they will not be maintaining the shelled space. Berryman asked and Jones said there is not a cost with the shelled space. Motion by Eason, second by Meigs to approve Option 1. Meigs said he agrees with what has been said that the time has never been better with interest rates and construction costs to move on Option 1. Sattler asked and Jones said it is estimated that the City will save $87,000 a year with option 1.5. Sattler asked and Jones said there will be no operational savings at all with option 1. Sattler asked and Nero said if you give the police department the space, it will be used. Sattler said his concern is with`the operational costs. He asked and Nero said there is an opportunity to turn off all lights and cutting off air. Nero added they can do that but what that would equate to in savings he does not know. Brandenburg said, once you move out, the old police station and part of the communications building will be empty which will result in savings as well. Berryman said she inclined to say not to use the space if the City does not need it right now. She added she likes the idea of planning and adding space incrementally as needed. Gonzalez said weighing all the current cost and future costs, it seems Option one is the best option. Vote on the motion: Approved 6-1 (Berryman opposed) L Consideration and possible action to appoint a selection committee to review architectural services qualifications for the design of Public Safety Operations and Training Facility -- Terry Jones, Support Services Director and Micki Rundell, Chief Financial Officer Jones said at the last Council meeting, the Council approved the monies for the architectural firm for the facility. He said the next step of the process would to be appoint a selection committee. He said Mayor Garver is recommending Danny Meigs, Troy Hellman, Robert Fite, Wayne Nero and Terry Jones be appointed to the committee. Motion by Eason, second by Jonrowe to approve the appointment of the committee. Approved 7-0 M Forwarded from the Georgetown Utility System (GUS) Advisory Board: Consideration and possible action to approve the Change Order #2 for the 2006 Annexation Phase 11 to McLean Construction, Ltd., of Killeen, Texas, in the amount of $106,787.00 -- David Munk, P.E., Utility Engineer and Glenn W. Dishong, Utility Director Munk described the item and said it follows a city offsite utility construction agreement to extend an eight inch gravity wastewater line to the Wheeler tract. He said on November 11, the GUS Board unanimously recommended approval of this item Motion by Sattler, second by Hellmann to approve the change order. Approved 7-0 N Forwarded from the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB): Consideration and possible action for the award of the annual bid for Hot Mix Asphalt to RTI of Pflugerville, Texas for the purchase of asphalt on an as needed basis in the estimated amount of $430,750.00 with the two-year bid totaling $861,500.00 -- Mark Miller Transportation Services Manager and Edward G. Polasek, City Council Meeting Minutes/ Page 6 of 8 Pages AICP, Transportation Services Director Miller described the item and said bids were received to provide the City with the top deed and top asphalt. He said bids were taken for the estimated annual amount with the option to renew two additional one year periods. He said they said this same provision last year. He said they did have a second bid of $500,000. He said they did look at the state contract and noted it is very time consuming to place an order and it is very specific on the time the City would get it. He spoke about the process of using this asphalt. He said this was taken to GTAB on November 11 and was unanimously approved. Motion by Eason, second by Hellmann to approve. Approved 7-0 O Forwarded from the Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board (GTAB): Consideration and possible action for the award of the annual bid for Emulsion oil used in road construction to Ergon Asphalt & Emulsion, Inc. of Austin, Texas on an as needed basis in the estimated amount of $110,338.80 with the two year bid totaling $220,777.60 -- Mark Miller Transportation Services Manager and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Transportation Services Director Miller described the item and said this is to buy the City's oil and emulsion on an as needed basis. He spoke about the cost of this purchase. He said this is the oil used for paving. He said this item was also recommended unanimously by the GTAB board. Motion by Meigs, second by Hellmann to approve. Approved 7-0 P Consideration and possible action to approve project expenditures for sidewalk improvements, landscaping and public art on Austin Avenue, from 7"' to 8"' for $136,000 from the Downtown Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) -- Mark Miller, Transportation Services Manager and Laurie Brewer, Deputy City Manager Brewer said this is a project that has been kicked around as staff members and is being forwarded to Council by the Downtown TIRZ Board. She said this project would expand the width of sidewalk and remove the parking spaced on that area on Austin Avenue between 7th and 8th streets. She said this would allow for enhanced pedestrian access, opportunity for additions) seating and increase visibility. She said staff spoke to all of the business owners and they were in agreement with this. She said the money would come from the Downtown TIRZ budget. She said this would include engineering, the sidewalk improvements, drainage improvements, barriers in the form of planters that would have vegetation in them. Motion by Hellmann, second by Eason to approve. Eason said and Brewer confirmed that there was only one businessperson who was concerned about this is safety. Brewer said safety is going to be incorporated into the design work. Brandenburg said because of EI Monumento and other development, there will be more signals that will slow down traffic. Berryman said she is concerned with the amount of traffic and the speed of the traffic. She said she there was supposed to be a light in front of the Monument and she spoke about how dangerous that is for people to cross the street there. She continued to speak about that crosswalk and how it is dangerous. Staff spoke to Council about the pedestrian system that will be put in place in that area. There was much discussion. Vote on the motion: Approved 7-0 Q Consideration and possible action to approve an Assignment of the Social Services Agreement between the City of Georgetown and Light Texas, Inc. to Brookwood Community Association, Inc. d/b/a Brookwood in Georgetown ("BiG") -- Paul E. Brandenburg, City Manager Brandenburg described the item and explained why the social services agreement is being changed from Light Texas to Brookwood. Motion by Berryman, Hellmann to approve. Approved 7-0 Meeting adjourned at 8:34 PM City Council Meeting Minutes/ Page 7 of 8 Pages Approv Mayor GeorgeGarver City Council Meeting Minutes/ Page 8 of 8 Pages Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 08:34 PM. r*—,, - I )v, M-4 1 FAN W-0