HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD 2003-09 - ANX William Addison SurveyAN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN,
TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR THE EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BOUNDARY LIMITS
OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, AND THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY CONSISTING OF 100.00 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN THE WILLIAM
ADDISON SURVEY, AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS ORDINANCE;
WHICH SAID TERRITORY LIES ADJACENT TO AND ADJOINS THE PRESENT
BOUNDARY LIMIT OF THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, TEXAS AND NOT BEING
A PART OF ANY INCORPORATED AREA; PROVIDING FOR SERVICE PLANS,
REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCLUDING
A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, may under the Charter of said
City, Section 1.06, annex areas as allowed by State law; and
WHEREAS, the owners of the area proposed for annexation submitted a petition in writing
requesting annexation of the area; and
WHEREAS, the petition described the area by metes and bounds and was acknowledged
in the manner required for deeds by each person having an interest in the area; and
WHEREAS, State Statute allows for the annexation of sparsely occupied areas on a petition
of the landowner if specific criteria are met; and
WHEREAS, the areas proposed for annexation are one-half mile or less in width, are
contiguous to the City limits of the City of Georgetown, and are vacant and without residents or have
fewer than three qualified voters in residence, thus meeting the specific criteria in the State Statute;
and
WHEREAS, the Georgetown City Council approved a resolution granting the petition on
September 24, 2002; and
WHEREAS, all of the herein -described property lies within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of
the City of Georgetown, Texas; and
WHEREAS, the herein -described property lies adjacent and contiguous to the City of
Georgetown, Texas; and
WHEREAS, all prerequisites of state law and the City Charter have been complied with;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GEORGETOWN, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are
hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and
expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this
ordinance implements the following Policy Ends of the Century Plan - Policy Plan Element:
Ordinance•rB
Annexation of 11 Acres,
Page of
1. Environmental and Resource Conservation End 3.0, which states: "The physical qualities
that make Georgetown attractive are protected"; and
2. Growth and Physical Development End 7.2, which states: "Annexation procedures and
standards benefit the community"
and further finds that the
enactment of this ordinance
is not inconsistent
or in conflict with any
other
Century Plan Policies, as
required by Section 2.03 of
the Administrative
Chapter of the Policy
Plan,
SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Georgetown hereby annexes: 100.00 ACRES,
MORE OR LESS, IN THE WILLIAM ADDISON SURVEY, as described in Exhibit A of this ordinance,
as shown in B of this ordinance, which contains the property descriptions for the tracts. Exhibit C
contains the service plan.
SECTION 4. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in
conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect.
SECTION 5. If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any person or
circumstance, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or application
thereof, of this ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and
to this end the provisions of this ordinance are hereby declared to be severable.
SECTION 6. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this ordinance and the City Secretary
to attest. This ordinance shall become effective in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of
the City of Georgetown.
PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the 12th day of November 2002,
PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the 28th day of January 2003,
V112 -um
Sandra D. Lee
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ik==
Patricia E. Carls
City Attorney
Ordinance
..
Annexation00 Acres, The Pinnacle
THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN:
By: GarJelon
Mayor
r.u�--cam-vc lu:sccrl "owara tngineers 512-4.4.8-4989
EXHIBIT A
FIELD NOTES
A
G
A
A 100.00 acre tract or parcel of land out of the William Addison Survey Abstract No? 1,
in Williamson Counr`!, Texas, as conveyed to john Sr_ and Dorothy E. Dytrich,
+ recorded in BC,0k 582 Pagc 494 of the Williamson County Deed Rccards, note
particuiariv described by zactes and'>ouads as follows:
&ginmng U az iron pipe found for the Northeast corner or 19.06 acres of land as
vy dcscnd in the Contract of Sale and Purchase from the Veterans Land Board of Texas as
recorded m Book 542 Page 516 of the Williamsoa County Deed Records for the
Southeast comer of the herein described tract of land.
., Thence with the :`forth line of said 19.06 acre tract of land the following tbree cnurms,
S70° 09' 2' "W a distance of 599.17 feet to a found iron ro<L S70° 09' 50"W adist=e of
466.52 feet to a found iron rod and 5690 29' 25"W a distance of 596.70 feet to a 60d nail
found at a railroad tic fence
post in the East rightof-way line of t}'.ef K &T. Railroad as
descabed iu Special Warrarrty Deed the City of Gtargetown recorded in Volume 1970
"
Page 497 of the Williams County Official Records, for the Southwest corner herein.
I Thence lxith the said East nghvof-wayline N26°44'
32 W a distance of 2435.11 feet to a
iron rod found in the South line of a 154.79 acre tract of land as conveyed to Join
Dbnmitt Hughes and recorded in Volume 276 Page 49 of the Williamson County Deed.
Records, for the Northvrrst earner 'herein.
Then= with the South line of said 154.79 acre tract N70'0 U41 a dist. of 194&M
74
feet to a iron roti found for an ell corner of said 154.79 acre tract and the Northeast corner
herein.
Thence with the West line of said 154.79 acre tract S20°00' 4a"E a distance of'1414.9`7
fit ro the ?ainr of Bei Arra. Cc:nsainiug ':00.00 acres, mo:� or ess, or lana.
TliE OF 17X
KNOW ALL, ' iEN BY T HESE PRESE" v TS:
I c.-rrify thw t,F�e move desczip 'an and d 1�rope:ty described hertin was net;smashed try a
j
sutvcy made on themound during August,2002 under my supery:, on.
WITNESS Nf`. HAND AND SEM., at .Austin, Travis County Texas this the 19"
day of Augsazn 20fs" A.D.
SLTR�a`Yza
2209 yv ft Farmer Lane
Charles P.titalaine-»......a.........,.,.w.,�,
Austin, Texas 7$ ? Registered P7ofessionla1 Und SurveMR
yor�--- ...»�
51. 66199 �t
No. 53.4 - S -tate of Texas 9 5324
'. r
ExA
S1
1 I
P.02
Exhlbil
A ROO` E A M A F Proposea Annexation Request
The Pinnacle by Cottonwood Creek Development
Legend
J Boundary
ParCO=
--_—:_ Freeway
Ocal
%lajor Arterial
frposed t
--h---*- railroad
city of Georgetown
Planning and Development Services Division:
Draft cartographic Data for Planning Purposes Only
January 22, 2003
Sb1R`.TiN"u'. �.`..�•'..r �. +SGLi. 46'XrWiJ4aMl'V[ .. n. ����..�....`..�» ..�.�� .N�SIDYF9ALtlALt'J'k.'iJ6A'.v
004 V, do
at:-
E Aug -26-02 10.428 Howarct Engineers
EXHIBIT B
•� M7a•nv�t�
t 1946.74-
i�
•� ' � VJL
t
14
L
F
`rr �w �e rase
ago lmt
_ voc rvM
r )Amwfta,aw,ama,
.t
Ta
• �� J h:..r
ti
—
vl
t
i
'
1
i
t
I
14
L
F
`rr �w �e rase
ago lmt
_ voc rvM
r )Amwfta,aw,ama,
Ta
• �� J h:..r
ti
—
t
i
'
1
i
14
L
F
Tract cm
100.00 a.
0"82/494.
512-448-0989
VI{Mi��4
CPO �.JIJ1428.?
L4Ti I)OF. .3 3 9'08.25.51
LGN—9740757,ZZ91
t
1
19Qn ��
c
`rr �w �e rase
ago lmt
_ voc rvM
r )Amwfta,aw,ama,
Ta
• �� J h:..r
ti
Tract cm
100.00 a.
0"82/494.
512-448-0989
VI{Mi��4
CPO �.JIJ1428.?
L4Ti I)OF. .3 3 9'08.25.51
LGN—9740757,ZZ91
t
1
19Qn ��
c
'" 99fl_f7'
3 t l � �. lA�J Pry Q �'r r• _ _
�+'it.S1$ �4r1Bu1s�T•8*�wawga/asnm}'�m,ic4me/,51A.1�a.r
�1'Z1:.IIW4tapeypr pse�a.uA+�r+•ei >1•Er184W ds! 3e.... -' �r v ,f
'�" '�P�'9 Nsaw.#ttotxaC:.'u.'eeYtyaamwflmtb.,xsy aa(rs %+.+rv+�: ay Ol Nwm�f l^ ^
>�m*EOD. Csr?§r�tJ�'�G�G.�e(.WT7ANR-'.j•L-!� .. ..f;.�r.•q ^t,'
14 Alt 74 t Zi�:. i.._ )t�`� �"Fii'.iC'.iC
tO X ACRZv TP.ACT OL`i' = 0 r i r�
ABSTRACT AVO. ZI
ViUJJolCM34DN CO UN7Yo TEXAS
Q.03
ti
—
t
i
-
'" 99fl_f7'
3 t l � �. lA�J Pry Q �'r r• _ _
�+'it.S1$ �4r1Bu1s�T•8*�wawga/asnm}'�m,ic4me/,51A.1�a.r
�1'Z1:.IIW4tapeypr pse�a.uA+�r+•ei >1•Er184W ds! 3e.... -' �r v ,f
'�" '�P�'9 Nsaw.#ttotxaC:.'u.'eeYtyaamwflmtb.,xsy aa(rs %+.+rv+�: ay Ol Nwm�f l^ ^
>�m*EOD. Csr?§r�tJ�'�G�G.�e(.WT7ANR-'.j•L-!� .. ..f;.�r.•q ^t,'
14 Alt 74 t Zi�:. i.._ )t�`� �"Fii'.iC'.iC
tO X ACRZv TP.ACT OL`i' = 0 r i r�
ABSTRACT AVO. ZI
ViUJJolCM34DN CO UN7Yo TEXAS
Q.03
Total Number of Units 475
Estimated Population 1,388
Fiscal Impact on General Fund:
Expenditures
General Government
Finance & Administration
Development Services
Community Services
Parks & Recreation
Fire Services
Police Services
Debt Service
Estimated Population
Expenditures from New Estimated increase
per Capita Development in Expenditures
$
49.99
11388
$
$
3.70
11388
$
$
28.66
11388
$
$
29.59
11388
$
$
36.60
1,388
$
$
69.43
1,388
$
$
88.40
11388
$
$
49.83
11388
$
$
356.19
1,388
69,406.77
5,139.72
39,789.20
41,080.63
50,816.68
96,394.58
122,744.80
69.179.22
Estimated Revenues
Generated from New
Major Revenues Development
r
?rage: , +a:K 2009,179,16
ROI frorn Utility Revenue 5 41727.01 ' Not necessarily dependent on annexation
Sales tax ('1.0% General Fund) 124,431.73 ' Not necessarily dependent on annexation
AL
Estimated Net Fiscal Impact on
General Fund (Revenues minus
Expenditures)
Cather Revenue Impacts: Not necessarily dependent on annexation
Gather Revenues
Sales Tax
4B \10.5=10) $ 62,215.86
Street tvlaintentance (0.25%) $ 31,107.93
Sales Tax Subtotal $ 93,323.80
opDo Q0 � o
Fiscal impact Model - Pin lade - SUMMARY
1/23/20031 i
Development: PINNACLE
Demographic Multipliers Estimated Population Impact
Number of
Units Household School -Age School -Age ;
Housing Type Bedrooms Proposed Size Children Total Children
SF, detached
0
1.46
0
0
0
1
1.97
0.10
0
0
2
1.97
0.40
0
0
3 275
2.69
0.79
740
218
4 200
3.24
1.38
648
275
5+
3.63
1.54
0
0
SF, attached
0
1
2.08
0.10
0
0
2
2.04
0.30
0
0
3
2.44
0.83
0
0
4
3.26
1.10
0
10
5+
MF, 2 units
0
1.76
0
0
0;
1
1.55
0.05
0
0
2
1.90
0.21
0
0'
3
2.88
0.98
0
0+
4
3.50
1.19
0
0'
5+
-
MF, 3-4 units
0
1.64
0
0
0
1
1.41
0.04
0
0
2
2.00
0.22
0
0.
3
3.07
1.04
0
0
4
MF, 5-9 units
0
1.34
0
0
0
1
1.26
0.04-
0
0'.
2
1.92
0.22
0
0
3
2.63
0.89
0
0
4
3.94
1.33
0
0'
5+
_
MF, 10.19 unsts
0
1.39
0
0
0
(
1
1.20
0.04
0
0
2
1.82
0.20
10
0
3
2.82
0.95
0
0
4
MF, 20,43 units
0
1.59
0
0
0
1
1.36
0.04
0
0
2
1.85
0.21
0
0
3
2.60
0.88
0
0
4
5+
MF,50+units
0
1.53
0
0
0'
1
1.34
0.04
0
0
2
1.80
0.20
0
0
3
2.52
0.85
0
0'
5+
Mobile home
_
0
0.96
0
0
0
1
1.43
0.16
0
0
2
1.77
0.16
0
0
3
2.79
0.82
0
0
4
3.88
1.14
0
0_
5+
!Other
0
1.01
0
1
1.63
_--
0
2
1.96
-
0
1
J
2.51
0
_
•
L
5+
Avei age all types
0
1.42
---
0
1
1.51
0
2
1.92
-
0
3
2 39
-
o
4
3.26
•--
0
5+
3.63
0 _
TOTAL
�"IaC.2i i.ri
0 44 03a 0
i:� n flan ! Lm..?,.{. h® 0 01
Units
1'MP1 Id IlTij?1Ci
People School Age
= '3881 494
1123/2003, 2
z^.ource: Total 1•1H Size and Num4er of School Age Children taken from The Fiscal Impact Handbook by Robert W. Burcheli and
Ca%,;d t.istckin Ratios were calculated by TIP Strategies, Inc.
Fiscal Impact Modes - Pinnacle - IUultlpliers 1970
V ADO 00 Igr 4001`
FV Iq
II Arrap Ped 5 0 tom,.
1 /2312003, 3
of
doofto
Housing Type and Number of
Total HH Size
Number of School•
School -Age
Relationship to
Bedrooms
Age Children
1990 Multipliers Worksheet
Total Size
Single family
1 fam hs, detached (Town house
2
2.995
0.604
0.2017
multiplier was used for SF with 1
3
3.758
1.109
0.2951
bedroom. 4 -bedroom multiplier was
4
4.680
1.988
0.4248
used for 5 or more category.)
blended
3.754
1.161
0.3093
Garden apartments
All MF (Torn house multiplier was
1
1.690
0.052
0.0308
used for 3 -bedroom and higher.)
2
2.652
0.298
0.1124
blended
2.246
0.274
0.1220
Hiah rise
Not used (Very feu! "high-rise"
studio
0.000
0.000
---
developments would be considered
1
1.282
0.000
0.0000
and number of children generated is
2
1.867
0.200
0.1071
typically lower than "low-rise"
blended
1.483
0.050
0.0337
apartments)
Town houses
1 fam hs, attached (3 -bedroom
1
1.783
0.087
0.0488
multiplier was used for 4 and 5 or
2
2.720
0.400
0.1471
more categories)
3
3.735
1.265
0.3387
blended
2.741
0.570
0.2080
Mobile homes
Mbl home (3 -bedroom multiplier was
1
2.070
0.239
0.1155
used for 4 and 5 or more categories)
2
2.592
0.239
0.0922
3
4.089
1.207
0.2952
blended
2.951
0.513
0.1738
z^.ource: Total 1•1H Size and Num4er of School Age Children taken from The Fiscal Impact Handbook by Robert W. Burcheli and
Ca%,;d t.istckin Ratios were calculated by TIP Strategies, Inc.
Fiscal Impact Modes - Pinnacle - IUultlpliers 1970
V ADO 00 Igr 4001`
FV Iq
II Arrap Ped 5 0 tom,.
1 /2312003, 3
Averaqe Number of Persons by Units in Structure and Bedrooms
Units in Structure
No bedrooms
1 bedroom
2 bedrooms
Total
School
Age
Total
School
Age
Total
School
Age
Mbl home
0.96
0.00
1.43
0.16
1.77
0.16
1 faro hs, detached
1.46
0.00
1.97
0.10
1.97
0.40
1 tam hs, attached
---
2.08
0.10
2.04
0.30
2 apartm
1.76
0.00
1.55
0.05
1.0 0
0.21
3-4 apar
1.64
0.00
1.41
0.04
2.00
0.22
5-9 apar
1.34
0.00
1.26
0.04
1.92
0.22
10-19 ap
1.39
0.00
1.20
0.04
1.82
0.20
2049 ap
1.59
0.00
1.36
0.04
1.85
_ 0.21
50 plus
1.53
0.00
1.34
0.04
1.80
0.20
Other
1.01
---
1.63
-
1.96
-
Total
1.42
1.51
1.92
Number of housing records
based on:
1 11431
1 10,386
1 23,009
ModelFiscal li-ripact
o.` .%` "0it .r
1/23/2003, 4
Per capita multiplier/proportional valuation method
Expenditures by category (actual):
General Government
Finance & Administration
Development Services
Community Services
Parks & Recreation
Fire Services
Police Services
Debt Service
TOTAL
Percent of valuation that is
residential
Population
Proportional Valuation %Method.
Expenditures by category (actual):
General Government
Finance & Administration
Development Services
Community Services
Parks & Recreation
Fire Services
Police Services
Debt Service
TOTAL
Fiscal Year Ended September 30:
2002 2001 2000 1999
n/a
21233,073
1,989,287
1,811,406
n/a
165,364
156,030
133,671
nla
11280,166
11282,168
1,271,215
n/a
1,321,716
1,175,297
1,104,050
n/a
1,634,961
1,441,796
1,247,453
n/a
3,101,371
2,534,940
21389,632
n/a
3,949,155
31588,983
3.377:274
n/a
21225,752
1,709,802
1,676,438
15,911,558
13,878,303
13,011,139
Fiscal Year Ended September 30:
2002 2001 2000
69.68 not reported prior to year-end 2002
2002
(projection)
33,976
July 1, 2001
estimate
(TSDC)
31,127
2000 Census
28,339
1999
1999
29,331
Percent of
valuation that is Estimated
Fiscal Year End residential (FYE residential Population Expenditures per
September 30, 2001 9/30/02) expenditures (7/1/01 Estimate) capita
21233,073
69.68
1,556,005
165,364
69.68
115,226
1,280,166
69.68
892,020
11321,716
69.68
9203972
1,634.951
69.68
11139,241
3,101,371
69.68
29161,035
319491155
69.68
21751,771
212259752
69.68
11550,904
515,9111558
69.68
$11,087,174
Fiscal {Mpact Model - Pinnacle Per Capita Exp
YX_ha�e`� d/ p" Pv 7
31,127
,$x49.99
31,127
$3.70
31,127
$28.66
31,127
$29.59
31,127
$36.60
31,127
$69.43
31,127
$88.40
31,127
$49.83
31,127 1 -- $356.19
1/23/2000i 5
r
z
W
w
W
0
M
Q)
V'
U)
y
T
CD
M'
r
N
C
W j
(3
44
x
r
r r
T
(D
CD (o
to
N
N
N N
N
O
O
O O
0
C�
•••
CO
M
M CO
M
L
U
00
0
O
N
_N
r
0
0
Gn
.m.
0
M
CO
to
R
Ff3
£iT
�
O
0
p
O
O
O
O
0
L
mLO
3
r
0
N
C3
co
>
M
O
t-
Go.
(4
O
O
0
>
U7
4
i
o
63
C?
r
r
N
_
x
as
0
0
C
0
c0
O
o
w
r
r
fl.
E
G
x
W
EA
EK
00
o
0
o
w
N
a
cu
�NCO
J
V
L
((f
r
r
0
v
m
E
r
6
h
E
O
N
N
�!
z
i
O
M
Q)
w
1
U
z
Z
a.
w
CL
0
:a
w
f]
N
UD
ns
o r
0 rn r
a !'r r
F— r,: N
{g
m
U m
= y m o 0
c a
aN U) C O C)
cr. t4
ma to
(D
Rf CD
E W
LO
M q T
LIJ ( LLi i1i N
t(j
u
_ co
r
0 ct
N
6q
M
Cv
y r
m X t4 dN'
✓ RS ui
UI
�3
E W
O co
a>
d
LU a d
O CI
i7.
4
rn L tcD�
OY
tlJ h co
w C
h CL (fl
L
Q, mwC)vmM
Q) m
N V It W Co M Lo
US CL t W
d m
� U
m
x
m N3 fR Ef? tf} 60 <f! 64
H
c
°koLna�a 0% %0
O [I'
to a) M M O
h d' m
amV' tD m W N
0 * .-I N N N N N M
IL
tD W cD N M 0
m x v n W� W h rn
F- O" r In O O tf) VS
rovW,-mw
U mNnorNCDo
cN coowm0
No0
CD W W O O
N N
E o
r
ft
0
N
n
W
r
M
M
_
CD
O
U')
co
co
O
•-�ncan
m
Q
W
wGr
t6
O
O
O
O)D7..O
G
rn
rn
rn
rn
o
0
�rn
r
r
r
r
r
N
N
05
(�
t'
o
co
m
W
o
w
0
N
n
W
r
M
M
N
CD
O
U')
co
co
O
LO
m
Q
GS
to
7
O
t.C)
O
05
(�
t'
o
co
m
W
o
w
X
CL
m
~
V>
H}
Vf
Vil
6%
H3
6c}
a
to
Ln
O
O
[i-
tD
W
M
M
Q
ON
M
M
O
o
O1
ri
V'
t0
lT
W
N
Qti
N
N
N
N
N
M
4+
W
a
x
O
W
W
u7
CD
G
N
a
x
r
cND
cp
CD
Lo
co
CO
U/q)�
jJj
U)
ui
�"�
W
d'
r
Lo
W
Qi
W
(.)
O
CO
C
.m+
t 7
co
O
-moi'
m
O
N
N
N
N
N
E
O
0
L
Q?
m
rn
rn
rn
rn
rn
o
0
N
07
G7
O
C)
O
G
O
0
i"
r
r
r
r
r
N
N
0
w
z
z
d
z
w
a
C
w
LU
a
0
ri
0
0
N
to
N
T
c o c c o
.- p to tt1 r
d
GO to h h O
CD o o) to h
tt7
C
h r r N N
>N
1) N h h
_
0
N r st
N
a:
w
CH Cf} N} U3. ffl 4R
U) LO Lo a) to
w
O
h h r h h
y V rY V C V
i
9
E
EC
O
z
NO O O N
6) co to CO tq
-^.
IL
C
T
Q
tf3 t» W- e» e3 t9
CD O O O to
x 0 0 0 r
6c6 to M to
<}'
Cch
r tD to
<P co r O)
O
c
':C
C13
*p
EFT 69 (j} Cf? Gq Aa
CD
rYa
co O Ln tD M
rntoht; C)
Y
y
CO N r CO
w
t`
O
CR 4,4 4{} (a EFJ CA
,
Cfl
C6 r
O
L
T T
Y
trot
)s�
CU
�Q
v
d
co to Le) U-)
ca
44
a
N CJ P7 N
T
C!'t Fi3 CFY CO
U ZT C
C
00 —
U O O
c 'CL
fn O O
U r L6
r
> in
J
Q
n!
o
w
U
z
C"
as
c
yw
cl
m
v > C71 J
Cd?
aUi s o cu
L�
uj 's cn C « 1-
0
ri
0
0
N
to
N
T
m
4
O O
O �
O 2
Q)
m
CD
CS
T^ O
O A
4!
E
CD
U) O
V�! co C
Q] V
Q] f7-
0
Q 0 O
O y C
U)CaN
CZ C
c
Q)
O N 'p
y C
O 0 CZ
O
O C N
cs ( N
O >
G Q C. Q)
C 0) O CSO
o �n`ro`y' Qn
r c3
Q � �
y
U
C C
0
Z �
C.
0 to Q
cs a c cn
V y 0 C
O
O +
p C y 0
O Im
W p y 0
U iz� O0 L O
i U Q)
N ""' O y �
Q�- v ? v L
_Z r 4% C a
CL d Z II d
Q) Q)
C. Cl) @ O QC)
0.
y —'0
a 0 U
a r F 3
a C L
CL I� 4vrrAD v
g± Q) 0 0 Q)
X R
> E E E
Lu Lu w ul
u `
C
O
CU
N
C
aS
C
C)
N
CO
N
T—
a
X
w
U
V?
C)
U
U
U
C%
a
2.
CL
E
:J
:L
x
Lo
0
F
CD
LO
00
�
wN
y
V-'
M
T
cc
Y
y
w
ui
Ln
Ln to
to
co
co
co co
00
C-0
(D
(D co
to
T
T
T^ T
T
O
m
r
0 {
^
,Wrt
V
0
a
o
_
0
o
a
0
-o
a
a
o
co
>
609-69
fA
coo
c
O
CI
O
O
O
>
N
U)
coo
R
O
40
(D
O
O
C
Q}
0)
Al
cy)
to
x.
. m
T^
T-
N
>
o
c
;0
LO
LO
Y
T
T^
C.
E
v
x
W
619
ia
00
QY
O
0
�
z4.
y
n
>*
a.
_y
y
R
4
Qui
60
G
ai
CC
y
d
O
0
N
o
i)i)
low
Z
It
Q)
CL
0
R
a
a�
E
Et
O
cn
C
O
CU
N
C
aS
C
C)
N
CO
N
T—
a
X
w
U
V?
C)
U
U
U
C%
a
2.
CL
E
:J
:L
Assumptions based on FTE per 1,000 population
DEVELOPMENT:
PINNACLE
Population from new
development: 11388
Additional Public Safety FTEs
needed (based on Georgetown
FTEs per 1,000):
Police -arrest 2.25
Police -other 1.18
Firefighters 1.52
Fire -other 0.37
Total Public Safety FTEs 5.32
Population in 2000
United States 281,421,906
Texas 20,851,820
City of Georgetown 28,33
City of Round Rock 61,13
City of Cedar Park 26,04
Total
FTEs (Full -Time
Equivalents) per
1,000 Population
in 2000
Service Standards US`
Texas*
Round Rock
Cedar Park
Georgetown
TOTAL FTEs
39.07
43.61
7.56
8.45
11.87)
POLICE -ARREST....
POLICE -OTHER ....
FIREFIGHTERS ....
FIRE -OTHER .....
2.10
0.62
0.97
0.08
2.00
0.65
0.87
0.07
1.46
0.47
1.10
0.03
1.77
0.00
1.15
0.00
1.621
0.85!
1.09
0.26
Source: Figures for U.S., Texas, Round Rock, and Cedar Park calculated from U.S. Census Bureau Local Government
Employment and Payroll data for March 2000. FTEs for Georgetown calculated using 1990/2000 figures from 2001/2002
budget: Total i Es (p. 217}, Pol ce-arrest fp._152), Police -other (pp. 1501 and 154:;, Firefighters (p. 31), and Fire -outer ,
(pp. 72 and 76) .
'Note: US and TX figures include all types of local government (e.g., cities, counties, school districts. special districts).
1/23/2003, Page 10
ORD6 A00ol
�►,'..
City of Georgetown Municipal Service Plan
Introduction:
Requests have been received from Cottonwood Development, referred to collectively herein as
"Petitioners" or "Owners", to annex a 100 acre tract, more or less, out of the William Addison
Survey, into the City of Georgetown. The property is located south of the Inner Loop and east of
the proposed Maple Street extension, and will adjoin the present City limits.
A legal description of the property is attached.
The area is undeveloped and there are no residential structures and no one residing on the
property. The topography is similar to the property in the area surrounding the undeveloped
Maple Street extension.
This service plan has been prepared in accordance with Section 43.056 of the Texas Local
Government Code.
Schedule of Municipal Services to be Provided
Municipal facilities and services to the annexed area will be made available or provided by the City
within 2'/2 years following the date of annexation, unless otherwise specified below:
Police Protection
A) Existing services: None
B) Services to be provided: Police protection personnel and equipment from the city
police department shall be provided to the annexed area, beginning on the effective
date of the annexation ordinance, and shall be provided at the same level of service as
currently provided throughout the city.
C) Animal control services will be provided in the area when requested.
11. Fire Protection (Including EmercaencV Ambulance
A) Existing services: None
B) Services to be provided: Fire protection personnel and equipment from the city fire
department shall be provided to the annexed area, beginning on the effective date of
the annexation ordinance, and shall be provided at the same level of service as
currently provided throughout the city.
Ill. Solid Waste Collection
A) Existing services: None
B) Services to be provided: Solid waste collection shall be available to the annexed area
on the same basis and at the same level as provided throughout the city. However, no
oUigation oxis�.s f_a th- c.` t.. ,.,:ol,d�. nSt C.Dli.�.tior se.vac t., a pu.son who o us..a
the services of a privately -owned solid waste management provider.
Annexation Service Plan - Pinnacle Development 100 Acres
IV* Water Service in the Service Area of the City
A) Existing services: None
B) Services to be provided: In accordance with the terms of Title 13.10 of the
Georgetown Municipal Code.
V. Wastewater Service
A) Existing services: None
B) Services to be provided: In accordance with the terms of Title 13.10 of the
Georgetown Municipal Code
V€. Maintenance of Roads and Streets
A) Existing services: None
B) Services to be provided: For City streets, street maintenance and other street services
shall be provided to the annexed area on the same basis and at the same level as
provided throughout the city.
VII. Parks and Recreation
A) Existing services: None
B) Services to be provided: All of the city parks and recreational facilities shall be
available for use by residents of the annexed area, beginning on the effective date of
the annexation ordinance.
V€€€. Library Service
A) Existing services: City library facilities are presently available.
B) Services to be provided: All of the city library facilities shall be available for use by
residents of the annexed area, at the same level of service as currently provided
throughout the City, beginning oil the effective date of the annexation ordinance.
€X. Street Licthting
A) Existing services: None
B) Services to be provided: The city shall provide to the residents of the annexed area
the same type services for placement of street lights that are currently provided to any
other area of the city.
X: P€annin ti anZoning
A) Existing services: None
B) Services to be provided: The planning and zoning jurisdictions, including the
subdivision platting process of the city, will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of the annexation ordinance.
X€. Building Inspection - Code Enforcement
A) Existing Services: None
B) Services to be provided: On the effective date of the annexation ordinance, building
inspection personnel and equipment from the city building inspection department shall
be prJvidn t� the �ir!rieXcti ir'•31.'. On :l"`� effia.:�tlVe fi tc Qf the annexation ordinance,
all building permits and related construction permits will be issued in accordance with
existing city ordinances resolutions, regulations, and building codes. On the effective
date of the annexation ordinance, on site inspection services of new construction will
be provided. On the effective date of the annexation ordinance, the Planning and
Development Services Division will provide consultation with the developers
concerning site plans and building code requirements.
Annexation Service Plan — Pinnacle Development 100 Acres
P-, G li
• 0
dl
XII. Miscellaneous
All other applicable municipal
policies established by the City.
services will be provided to the area in accordance with
Xlli. Utilittr System Capital Improvements
The construction of any utility system capital improvements shall be in accordance with the
terms of the Agreement. The Agreement and this service plan may be amended to extend
the period for construction if the construction is proceeding with all deliberate speed.
However, the city does not violate this service plan or the Texas Local Government Code
if the construction process is interrupted for any reason by circumstances beyond the
direct control of the city.
XIV. Level of Service
Nothing in this plan shall require the city to provide a uniform level of municipal services to
each area of the city, including the annexed area, if different characteristics of topography,
land use, and population density are considered a sufficient basis for providing different
levels of service.
XV. Fiscal Analysis
The provision of services to the annexed area will have little cost impact on the City of
Georgetown's General Fund or on the utility ratepayers.
XVI. Term
This service plan shall be valid for a term of ten (10) years.
XVII. Amendments
This plan shall not be amended unless public hearings are held in accordance with
Section 43.0531 of the Texas Local Government Code.
Annexation Service Plan - Pinnacle Development 100 Acres
MCI
3 of 3
iii//
i / 0 2003
r 09
ex h N " C �"