HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD 2012-37 - Comp Plan Amend PUD Gatlin CreekORDINANCE NO. 2011 S -1
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, amending part of the
Zoning District Map adopted on the 41h Day of April 2002 in accordance with the Unified
Development Code passed and adopted on the 111h Day of March 2003, to rezone 121.64 acres
of the Issac Jones Survey, from the Agriculture District (AG) to Planned Unit Development
District (PUD) with a base district of Local Commercial (C-1); repealing conflicting
ordinances and resolutions; including a severability clause; and establishing an effective
date.
Whereas, an application has been made to the City Council for the purpose of changing
the zoning district classification of the following described real property ("The Property"):
121.64 acres of the Issac Jones Survey, as recorded in Document Numbers 9612381 and
2009090679 of the Official Public Records of Williamson County, Texas, hereinafter
referred to as "The Property";
Whereas, the City Council has submitted the proposed change in the zoning district
classification to the Planning and Zoning Commission for its consideration at a public hearing
and for its recommendation or report; and
Whereas, notice of such hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation in
the City; which stated the time and place of hearing, which time was not earlier than fifteen (15)
days for the first day of such publication; and
Whereas, written notice was given not less than fifteen (15) days before the date set for
the meeting before the Planning and Zoning Commission to all the owners of the lots within two
hundred feet of the property, as required by law; and
Whereas, the applicant for such zoning change placed on the property such sign(s) as
required by law for advertising the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing, not less than
fifteen (15) days before the date set for such hearing; and
Whereas, the City Planning and Zoning Commission in a meeting held on March 6, 2012,
recommended approval of the requested zoning change for the above described property from
the Agriculture District (AG) to Planned Unit Development District (PUD) with a base zoning
district of Local Commercial (C-1).
Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas,
that:
Section 1. The facts and recitations contained in the preamble of this Ordinance are
hereby found and declared to be true and correct, and are incorporated by reference herein and
expressly made a part hereof, as if copied verbatim. The City Council hereby finds that this
Ordinance implements the vision and policies of the Georgetown 2030 Comprehensive Plan and
Ordinance Number: POI D'3 -1 Page 1 of 2
Description: Gatlin Creek PUD Rezoning
Date Approved: May 22, 2012
further finds that the enactment of this Ordinance is not inconsistent or in conflict with any
other policies of the Georgetown 2030 Comprehensive Plan.
Section 2. The Zoning District Map of the City, as well as the Zoning District for the
Property shall be and the same is hereby changed from the Agriculture District (AG) to Planned
Unit Development District (PUD) with a base zoning district of Local Commercial (C-1), in
accordance with Exhibit A (PUD Development Plan with Exhibits A -I) incorporated herein by
reference, is hereby adopted by the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas.
Section 3. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts of ordinances and resolutions, in
conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, and are no longer of any force and effect.
Section 4. If any provision of this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or
circumstance shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions, or
application thereof, of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or
application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be severable.
Section 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign this Ordinance and the City Secretary
to attest. This Ordinance shall become effective and be in full force and effect on the date of
final adoption by City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED on First Reading on the 8t', day of May, 2012.
PASSED AND APPROVED on Second Reading on the 22°a day of May, 2012.
ATTEST:
-a Brettle"
Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
f
Bridget Chapman
Acting City Attorney
THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN:
By: George George Garver
Mayor
Ordinance Number: 'ba- — 3-f Page 2 of 2
Description: Gatlin Creek PUD Rezoning
Date Approved: May 22, 2012
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
GATLIN CREEK
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPEMENT
1. DEFINITIONS
1.1 All definitions referenced in the Unified Development Code of the City of
Georgetown, Ordinance No. 2003-16, as subsequently amended and codified in Title
17 of Georgetown Code of Ordinances (the "Code"), shall apply to interpretation of
the terms of this Planned Unit Development for the Gatlin Creek (this "PUD"). Any
terms not defined in this Development Plan shall be construed by applying the
Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, subject to the approval of such
interpretation by the director of Planning and Development Services of the City of
Georgetown.
2. PROPERTY
2.1 This PUD applies to approximately 122 acres of land located within the
jurisdictional limits of the City of Georgetown, Texas, which land consists of three
(3) lots being 121.64 ACRES OUT OF THE ISSAC JONES DURVEY, ABSTRACT
NO. 232, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, which are collectively herein defined
as the "Property", and which are legally described as follows:
JAMES DAVID WOLF, et al.
TRACT THREE, PARCEL ONE
DOC. #2009090679
O.P.R.W.C.
1.64 acres
JAMES DAVID WOLF, et al.
TRACT THREE, PARCEL TWO
DOC. #2009090679
O.P.R.W.C.
100.5 acres
JAMES DAVID WOLF, et al.
DOC. #9612381
O.R.W.C.
19.54 acres
3. APPROVAL CRITERIA
3.1 This PUD is intended to conform to the approval criteria of Sections
3.06.030 and 3.06.040 of the Code. Section 3.06.030 of the Code provides that the
following criteria shall be considered by City Council for zoning changes:
(a) The application is complete and the information contained within the
application is sufficient and correct enough to allow adequate review
and final action;
(b) The zoning change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan;
(c) The zoning change promotes the health, safety, or general welfare of
the City and the safe, orderly, and healthful development of the City;
(d) The zoning change is compatible with the present zoning and
conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the
neighborhood; and
(e) The property to be rezoned is suitable for uses permitted by the District
that would be applied by the proposed amendment.
Section 3.06.040 of the Code provides that, in addition of consideration of the
foregoing criteria of Section 3.06.030, the following applicable criteria shall be
considered by City Council for approving this PUD:
(a) An orderly and creative arrangement of all land uses with respect to
each other and to the entire community;
(b) A planned and integrated comprehensive transportation system
providing for a separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic, to include
facilities such as roadways, bicycle ways and pedestrian walkways;
(c) The provisions of cultural or recreational facilities for all segments of
the community;
(d) The location of general building envelopes to take maximum
advantage of the natural and manmade environment; and
(e) The staging of development in a manner which can be accommodated
by the timely provision of public utilities, facilities and services.
4. APPLICABILITY OF CITY ORDINANCES
4.1 This PUD shall be applicable to zoning as it applies to all portions of the
Property. All design, development, and use criteria not specifically covered by this
PUD shall be subject to the applicable provisions of the Code. All design,
development and use of the Property shall generally conform to the PUD described
herein and, unless superseded, amended or controverted by the terms of this PUD, to a
Local Commercial District (C-1), which is the zoning designations most similar to and
compatible with the design, development and use proposed for the Property.
Residential Single Family Detached is an allowable use in Zone B and Zone C on the
Property.
2
4.2. In Addition to permitted uses for base zoning district in Chapter 5 of the
Code and this PUD, the following shall be permitted uses for the Property:
(a) Indoor Kennels with a special use permit in Zone B and Zone C.
S. DEVELOPMENT ZONES
5.1 Improvements on the Property shall be designed and developed in three
Zones as shown on Exhibit "B", being Zone A, Zone B and Zone C.
5.2 Zone A represents approximately 15.7 acres of land comprising the
Property and is generally depicted as the area within the loop road of the
Development. Zone A is primarily the retail portion designed as the hub of the
development.
5.3 Zone B consists of approximately 73.1 acres of land and is generally
depicted as the Northern section outside the loop road of the Property. Zone B is
predominately Residential and Assisted Living/Nursing Home.
5.4 Zone C consists of approximately 32.8 acres of land and is generally
depicted as the Southern section outside the loop road of the Property. Zone C is
primarily Residential, Retail and Office.
5.5 Improvements on the Property shall be designed and developed in
accordance with Sec. 4.1 with the following restrictions:
(a) All commercial uses except office shall not be within 50' of existing
residential adjacent to the Property on the Northern most corner and
Williams Drive for a distance of 100' from Williams Drive; and not within
100' of all other existing residential uses adjacent to the Property (Ref.
Exhibit D).
(b) Commercial uses excluding office may not exceed the following percent
of the Zone area with a maximum 25% for the overall Property:
• Zone A —100%
• Zone B — 10%
• Zone C — 25%
5.6 A proposed rendering of the project which remains subject to modification
as permitted under this PUD and the Code is depicted in Exhibit "C", attached hereto
and incorporated herein by reference. The final number, size, use and location of
Buildings may vary on the final site plan(s).Proposed Building Setbacks are depicted
on Exhibit "D", attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes.
5.7 The final site plan(s) shall be subject to City approval according to Section
3.09 of the Code. This PUD allows for multiple site plans or subdivisions within the
Property in order to allow for phased development. City approval shall be based upon
3
each individual site plan, provided that, taken together, all site plans provide for an
integrated mixed use development on the Property.
5.8 Under this PUD, "Building Height" shall be defined according to Section
7.03.030(D) and will be designed and developed to comply with building height
limitations prescribed under Table 7.03.020.
5.9 Setbacks are not required between Residential and Multifamily uses as
part of the development. Setbacks are not required between Office and Commercial as
part of this development. Setbacks excluding those shown on Exhibit D are subject to
the UDC requirements.
5.10 Impervious cover shall not exceed seventy (70) percent as applied to the
aggregate sum of the building and improvement footprints compared to the
comprehensive area of land comprising the Property. Individual site plans for the
Property shall tabulate cumulative totals relative to impervious cover for the Property.
In no case, shall a site plan be approved by the City if it causes the impervious cover
on the comprehensive area of land comprising the Property to exceed seventy (70)
percent. However, platted Single Family Residential lots will conform to the 45%
impervious cover per the UDC. Property shall meet the requirements of
11.02.020.A.1, Low Impact Design by incorporating a Regional Water Pond for
Water Quality, Vegetative Filter Strips along the inundation easement on the property
and providing a maintenance agreement for these elements. Property shall meet the
requirements of 11.02.020.A.3, Preservation of Natural Areas by preserving the entire
area on the Property within the inundation easement by allowing only trail, water
quality development and park improvements in this area.
6. SIGNAGE STANDARDS
6.1 A Master Sign Plan, meeting the requirements of Chapter 10 of the UDC,
shall be required for this development at time of Site Plan. This PUD proposes
additional signage standards that, where in conflict with the provisions of Chapter 10,
shall prevail. The Master Sign Plan will serve to implement signs uniformly as a
means of clear visual communication, and is intended to cause the designs of any
signs on the Property to be complementary to the natural environment, and to
improve pedestrian and vehicular safety.
6.2 Signs may only convey the name of the businesses, logos and the products
or services offered within the Property, provided, however, that temporary
construction signs, signs advertising portions of the Property for sale or lease, and
temporary signs announcing special events on any portion of the Property shall be
permitted.
6.3 Subdivision entry signs, monument signs, walls, fencing, architectural
features, as well as sign design and lettering, along the public right-of-way adjoining
the Property will be homogenous and will consist of a standard design to ensure that
the comprehensive signage for the Property does not dominate the streetscape. All
signs shall be constructed of materials and colors compatible with those utilized on
the Buildings' facades so as to blend into the environment and the development
scheme of the Property in general.
6.4 Billboard signs shall not be erected on the Property.
6.2 Up to two (2) Subdivision Entry Signs may be designed, developed and
placed in a median in the public right-of-way of the loop road of the Property, more
specifically at Williams Drive at two major roadway intersections, subject to site
triangle analysis and approval of a License to Encroach. Subdivision Entry Signs on
the property shall not be subject to a 5 -foot setback from the public right -of way,
provided the signage does not obstruct the site triangles. Where advertising four (4) or
more tenants, each Subdivision Entry Sign may be a maximum of eight (8) feet in
height and be allowed a maximum of sixty four (64) square feet for each of the two
(2) permitted sign faces to advertise the tenants of the development. Refer to "Exhibit
I" for Signage details.
6.3 Signage for the remainder of the development, shall comply with the
provisions of Chapter 10 of the Code.
6.4 When a portion of the development is designed as pedestrian oriented
plaza surrounded by restaurants, office, retail or any combination of these, all with
direct access to the pedestrian promenade, the need may arise for informational kiosks
message centers to help orient pedestrians to the available services and events of this
style of development.
7. WATER QUALITY & DETENTION
7.1 Water Quality. The Property is located within the Edwards Aquifer
Recharge Zone according the TCEQ USGS Quad Map. The Property must comply
with the requirements of Chapter 11 of the Code and the Edwards Aquifer Rules of
the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). Water Quality and
Detention are allowed and may be located within the floodplain or innundation
easement with the approval of the CORPS of Engineers, TCEQ and the City.
8. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION & TREE PRESERVATION
8.1 The Plan will comply with the tree preservation and environmental
protection standards detailed in Chapter l land Chapter 8 of the Code, except as
otherwise specified in this PUD.
8.2 Due to the great number of Heritage Trees on this Property, Heritage
Trees on this Property are allowed to be removed as follows:
5
• Single Trunk Heritage Trees (30"+ diameter) — Removal requires City
Council Approval at time of Site Plan review and 3:1 mitigation ratio
• Single Trunk Heritage Trees (<30") — Removal requires approval of a
Tree Removal Permit at time of Site Plan review following standard
UDC procedures for such and 3:1 mitigation ratio
• Two Trunk Heritage Trees (each trunk <26") — Maximum removal of
20% of the trees allowed with 2:1 mitigation ratio
• Multi Trunk Heritage Trees (each trunk <26") — Maximum removal of
40% of the trees allowed with 1:1 mitigation
Due to the uncertainty of the final water quality and detention plans, the Urban Forrester
shall have full responsibility for approval of all tree removal and mitigation, including
heritage trees, associated with these facilities.
8.3 It is an overriding goal of this development to preserve as many quality
trees as feasible, protected and heritage, along and generally for a minimum distance
of 100' from the Williams Drive R.O.W.
9. ROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURE
9.1 The Property has approximately 2,536 feet of frontage along Williams
Drive, a 5 lane arterial roadway. The City of Georgetown transportation criteria
require that a driveway or intersection on an arterial be separated by a minimum of
425 feet based upon the posted speed limit of 50 miles per hour, unless a waiver is
approved by the City Engineer. The Property, under this definition is allowed five (5)
curb / road cuts however under this PUD, the Properly shall have two (2) roadway
intersections and two (2) curb cuts on Williams Drive.
9.2 Intersection Safety Lighting and necessary traffic signal infrastructure may
be installed at the intersection of Williams Drive and the loop road of the Property in
preparation for a traffic signal when the intersection meets warrants.
9.3 No additional Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) or TIA update will be
required for this PUD, provided that the total peak -hour trips for the entire
development as outlined in the submitted TIA are not exceeded. The peak -hour trips
for the submitted TIA are from the 8th Edition of Trip Generation. For the purposes
of assessing allocated peak -hour trips as it relates to this requirement, all future peak -
hour trip generation calculations will be based on the 8th Edition of Trip Generation.
10. PEDESTRIAN & VEHICULAR CIRCULATION
10.1 The improvements within this PUD will be designed to maximize
pedestrian and vehicular circulation within the Property.
Con
This PUD will include pedestrian and vehicular circulation plans designed to provide
access to all areas within the Property and will incorporate homogenous design
features for all Buildings and other improvements and appurtenances within the
Property.
10.2 After final approval of this PUD, the general alignment of proposed
internal pedestrian and vehicular circulation may be modified from the proposed
rendering shown in Exhibit "C" to accommodate Building locations on the approved
site plan(s) and for the protection of trees and fire safety requirements. A schematic
presentation of suggested internal pedestrian and vehicular circulation is depicted in
Exhibit "C", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. It is the intent of
this PUD that vehicular streets internal to the Property and depicted as such in
Exhibit "C" be considered as public streets. Design Details for public streets on the
Property shall conform to Chapter 12 of the Code.
10.3 Connectivity to the property to the undeveloped Northwest is not required
as it was platted with the Fountainwood Estates, Phase 7 plat, has a Lakeview Lane
address and noted in the plat note 23 that resubdivision of more than 16 lots is not
allowed.
Right Of Way will be dedicated to allow connectivity to the adjacent to the property
to the Southeast, Williamson County Appraisal District ID Number R079841
10.4 Pedestrian walkways on the Property are planned to connect through the
CORPS of Engineers property and to their trail system with the CORPs approval,
ultimately providing connectivity to the City's trail system.
11. LANDSCAPING, OPEN SPACE, COMMON RECREATION AREA &
PARKLAND
11.1 Landscape Maintenance. A property owners' association will maintain
landscaping and irrigation in the rights of way and common areas on the Property.
11.2 Parkland Dedication. Fees may be paid in lieu of parkland dedication,
pursuant to the Code at submission of individual site plan(s) or subdivision, in an
amount equal to $250 per new dwelling unit, except that, for each structure containing
more than four (4) dwelling units, the fee shall be in an amount equal to $200 per
dwelling unit.
11.3 A minimum of 280 square feet of improved common recreation area per
dwelling unit shall be provided for all Multi -family development on this Property.
The required recreation area shall meet the basic needs of a local park, be approved
by the Director, and shall include a minimum of either: two (2) children's play areas,
picnic areas, trails (walkways or bike trails) or landscaped sitting areas, or one (1)
game court area, turf playing field, swimming pool, or recreational building. The
common recreation area shall be designed to adequately serve the number of
7
dwellings within the development, according to accepted City standards set by the
Parks and Recreation Department. All equipment and other improvements must be of
commercial quality and required private yard, open space or parkland dedication. The
common recreation area shall be privately constructed, maintained and operated by
the developer or an owner's association. The person or entity responsible for
ownership, maintenance and operational responsibilities shall be noted on the plat
and/or on a separate instrument recorded in the Official Records of Williamson
County.
12. BUILDING REGULATIONS
12.1 All Buildings designed for and constructed on the Property for non-
residential use will comply with the Non -Residential Design Standards set forth in
Section 7.04 of the Code unless otherwise provided for in this PUD.
12.2 Commercial, retail, services and office buildings within Zone A may
exceed 25,000 square feet.
13. EXTERIOR LIGHTING
13.1 Exterior Lighting on the Property and its Buildings will comply with the
requirements set forth in Section 7.05.020 of the Code related to outdoor lighting
unless otherwise described in this PUD.
14. PUD MODIFICATIONS
14.1 This PUD represents the allowable uses and design standards for the three
Zones contained within the Property. The concept plan depicted in Exhibit "C", and
the proposed pedestrian and vehicular circulation depicted in Exhibit "C" are general
in nature and do not represent final designs. Minor modifications, as approved by the
Director of Planning, to Building sizes, uses and locations, as well as to amenity areas
and to pedestrian and vehicular circulation, are allowed without amendment to the
PUD, providing modifications conform to the general intent of the PUD, uses
authorized by this PUD or to applicable provisions of the Code.
N.
15. LIST OF EXHIBITS
15.1 The following exhibits are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference:
A. Property Map with Existing Tract or Lot Lines Designated
B. Property Map with Zone Designations Outlined
C. Property Map with Conceptual Land Use Plan & Circulation
D. Property Map with Building Setbacks Outlined
E. Tree Survey and Tree Details
F. Typed Field Notes Identifying the Property on Letter -sized Paper
G. Tabulation of Total Square Footage and Residential Density
H. Existing Natural Features
I. Signage Details
0
d`dVV AldzddUdd
JUOLU auldni3u J!uf 1 PduuL-ld
�aaao ulile!D
1!41
W.
C
5dNUL 1N=MdU Id/\=]U
4UOWuUjUAiO J f!uf 1 Pi3uuL-ld
JaaaO uiljeJ
D
NUUV H ]JdIJ V NV Id UNV I
4Ui9WUUldnd(j J!u(1 Pduueld
�aaao uilIeE) lyl
-11
llkJlHX=J AJf/81=J5
JUiOW UjUAUU 4!u(1 Pduueld
jaaao UllIaJ
u
LL
LU
b
R O
ro
ONO
< b
00
(n
LU
Cq C dC .0
Z
R L-,Jj
QUA
0<0
Ym 7
mw 02 Ld 0.
cn > LLJ N Na
CD < CE0 F.
>
z 0 LLJ d
gl ,
oa M 0
U)b 0
NQ'
baa 4 LU
No
U) Cf)
LL
0 mo
< C)
o U)
<
C)
z0
J 0
0
Lo
m m 1161 z
m GSR Nvks—. � U) 0
0 cj
-L z
< <
tn o 00
<
5 Ljj V) N
0 V) 00 0
0 < (D
0 V)
3: of
9 (00 ZLUZ
0 U) Ldw0 '0
'
0
C) LL
V)
Z Lu (CdT a:
DF-
0 <
(n
bi m
0
g N$
LU
W 3 t
oZ
�-
O �
e W O s
O
s
J
O ! v
owo. QW
j W N a F O
O�OO WEU
(nF O
QIE
CDo z R
J m
R OQ
� I
R
� a
c
e
Z
g' b
N$
<
,X s F
a O "I
two R a a
Sod
��Jl RfJ
No
w< F$ $ O c
O> i a
o� R C O> $ c ( I J R =F g
_ 0)S
o $ p)Jr =
rc e e sx 8 L� U O 0 R=
Rc
a �n-0<06
0) = aF O O =
N a c $ ALJ 0� i
_$ jWNp_
211z0 E c
$$ x ae O
i
a i" gillc F s c
O12
O
W O
g
LLJ
<
C)
w LO
g
0
000 < A
V) N a_ C)
FW 0 - !Fl
Cl L6
z �.R
<
NMI I W
0
0
>
0', w
T
0<0(3
m
0
O1010-
OT
PR C)
1 (1110
Ld c)
<
R CD
LL LO
0 r�
04
ll�zz
0
oz0 cc)
No <<N<
ANN /I �5 I-- L c3
.:5 bb U) 0
ct C5
Z Lo
WD
0
C) w
<
0 af:5
w ee w
0 2
0
T 0
F-- >
U6
z
(n 0
r �
< r-
<
�- 6 F)
(n 0 co
W U) N .
V) Go c)
0)
0<
ou) -
�E r,- 0
zwz-b
z
zoo
Twp
0
T
T
UNESCO
aAAAAAABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAAAAAAAAAA
UNESCO
FIELD NOTES
JOB NO. 10020
DATE: January 25, 2011
PAGE 1 OF 3
121.64 ACRES
Being 121.64 acres of land situated in Williamson County, Texas, out of the Issac Jones Survey, Abstract
No. 232, and being that tract described as Tract Three, Parcel One (2.05 acres) and Tract Three, Parcel
Two (100.74 acres) in a Partition Deed to James David Wolf, et al., dated November 24, 2009 and
recorded as Document Number 2009090679 of the Official Public Records of Williamson County, Texas,
and that tract described as 20.0 acres in a Warranty Deed of Gift James David Wolf, et ux, dated March
12, 1996 and recorded as Document Number 9612381 of said official records and being further described
by metes and bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at an Army Corps of Engineers brass disk in concrete found for the southwest corner of said
Wolf Tract Three, Parcel Tow, and for an interior ell corner for that certain tract described as Tract No.
200-1 in a General Warranty Deed to the United States of America, dated March 4, 1971 and recorded in
Volume 535, Page 275, of the Deed Records of Williamson County;
THENCE: with the west line of said Wolf Tract Three, Parcel Two, the east line of said Tract No. 200-1,
and with a fence the following six (6) courses:
1. N 26°43'11" W 188.27 feet to an 18 inch elm,
2. N 30057'43" W 139.88 feet to a 3 inch pipe fence corner post found,
3. N 37054'16" W 298.50 feet to an Army Corps of Engineers brass disk in concrete found,
4. N 19023'10" W 216.92 feet to a 15 inch cedar,
5. N 26031'53" W 53.03 feet to a 16 inch live oak,
6. N 29046'37" W 274.14 feet to an Army Corps of Engineers brass disk in concrete found for the
most northerly corner of said Tract No. 200-1, and for the most easterly corner of that certain tract
described as 7.0013 acres in a Special Cash Warranty Deed to Fountainwood Estates
Homeowners' Association, dated April 24, 1998 and recorded as Document No. 9828017 of the
Official Records of Williamson County;
THENCE: continuing with the west line of said Wolf Tract Three, Parcel Two, with the easterly line of said
Fountainwood tract, and with a fence the following eight (8) courses:
1. N 30037'38" W 126.76 feet to a 6 inch live oak,
2. N 49013'23" W 41.15 feet to a nail found in an 18 inch live oak,
3. N 03046'24" W 85.39 feet to a nail found in a 10 inch live oak,
4. N 24046'56" E 35.43 feet to a nail found in an 18 inch cedar,
5. N 3104756" W 68.77 feet to a nail found in a dead 4 inch live oak,
6. N 21020'20" W 54.29 feet to a nail found in a twin 12 inch and 6" elm,
S:12010 PROJECTSV10020 J.D. Wolf Properties. LLCV120 acreslDOCSVFIELD NOTESl10020-01_OVERALL.doc
F
FIELD NOTES
JOB NO. 10020
DATE: January 25, 2011
PAGE 2OF3
7. N 27011'52" W 120,53 feet to a 10 inch live oak,
8. N 27°01'26" W 106.33 feet to a calculated point for the most easterly corner of Lot 25 of
Fountainwood Estates, a Williamson County subdivision recorded in Cabinet O, Slides 204 and
205 of the Plat Records of Williamson County;
THENCE: continuing with the west line of said Wolf Tract Three, Parcel Two, and with the easterly line of
said Lot 25 the following five (5) courses:
1. N 26"12'24" W 177.48 feet to a nail found in a dead live oak,
2. N 44018'56" W 13.69 feet to a 3/4 inch iron pin with aluminum cap found
3. N 37023'09" W 34.90 feet to a 1/2 inch iron pin found,
4. S 53055'56" W 198.76 feet to a 1/2 inch iron pin found,
5. N 17056'04" W 200.43 feet to a calculated point in the south line of Lot 26 of said Fountainwood
Estates, for the northwest corner of this tract;
THENCE: with the north line of said Wolf Tract Three, Parcel Two the following three (3) courses:
1. N 70034'54" E 206.62 feet to a 4 inch cedar fence corner post found for the southwest corner of
that certain tract described as 53.70 acres (Tract 1) in a Special Cash Warranty Deed to Mary
Hobbs Allen, dated October 28, 1997 and recorded as Document No. 9750060 of said official
records,
2. N 69055'00" E 106.27 feet to a 4 inch cedar fence corner post found,
3. N 68°11'11" E 279.38 feet to a calculated point,
4. N 68°11'11" E 217.57 feet to a 1/2 inch iron pipe found for the southeast corner of said Hobbs
tract and being at the most easterly southeast corner of Casa Loma, a subdivision in Williamson
County and recorded in Cabinet D, Slide 9 of the Plat Records of Williamson County,
THENCE: continuing with the south line of Casa Loma,
1. S 41034'40" E 7.63 feet to a calculated point,
2. S 59033'40 E 10.50 feet to a 1/2" iron pin found with no cap,
3. N 67014'39"E 281.76 feet to a calculated point,
4. N 68024'11" E 25.42 feet to a calculated point,
5. N 68"03'11" E 133.75 feet to a calculated point,
SA2010 PROJECTSMOW JD. Wolf Properties. LLC1120 acresV)OCSSELD NOTES110020-01_OVERALL.doc
F
FIELD NOTES
JOB NO. 10020
DATE: January 25, 2011
PAGE 3OF3
6. N 68009'11" E 74.12 feet to a calculated point,
7. N 6908'28" E 87.40 feet to a 1/2" iron pin with no cap,
8. N 69022'44" E 20.82 feet to a cotton spindle found for the most northerly northeast corner of said
Wolf Tract Three, Parcel Two and being the northwest corner of said Wolf tract (9612381),
THENCE: continuing with the south line of Casa Loma and the north line of said Wolf tract (9612381),
1. N 69022'44" E 1.58 feet to a calculated point,
2. N 71030'44" E 137.79 feet to a 1/2" iron pin found with no cap,
3. N 71004'08" E 298.26 feet to a 60d nail found in a 14" live oak,
4. N 68020'08" E 155.98 feet to a calculated point for the northeast corner of said Wolf Tract
(9612381) in teh west line of F.M. 2338 (aka Williams Drive);
THENCE: with the west line F.M. 2338,
1. 175.36 feet along a curve to the left (delta=3025'42", r=2930.73 feet, Ic bears S55002'12"E 175.34
feet) to a calculated point,
2. S 56045'03" E 942.89 feet to a calculated point for the southeast corner of said Wolf tract
(9612381) and the most easterly northeast corner of said Wolf Tract Three, Parcel Two,
3. S 56045'03" E 483.03 feet to a calculated point being the most northerly corner of said Wolf Tract
Three, Parcel One,
4, S 56045'03" E 53.18 feet to a calculated point,
5. S 56045'03" E 857.68 feet to a 1/2" iron pin found for the southeast corner of said Wolf Tract
Three Parcel One,
THENCE: with the south line of this tract,
1. S 67040'14" W 124.63 feet to a calculated point for the southwest corner of said Wolf Tract Three,
Parcel One being in the east line of said Wolf Tract Three, Parcel Two,
2. S 60051'58" E 25.86 feet to a 112" iron pin with no cap found for the southeast corner of said Wolf
Tract Three, Parcel two,
3. S 67056'30" W 1085.64 to a 5/8" iron pin found with no cap,
4. S 6403610" W 26.47 feet to a 6" cedar tree with old fence wire,
5. S 68013'13" W 435.70 feet to a 20" cedar tree,
S:V2010 PROJECTS110020 J.D. Wolf Properties. LLCV120 acresOOCS1FlELD NOTES110020-01_OVfERALL.doc
FIELD NOTES
JOB NO. 10020
DATE: January 25, 2011
PAGE 4 OF 3
6. S 67059'11" W 222.94 feet to a 22" cedar tree with a Corps boundary sign,
7. S 68°05'32"W 502.18 feet to a 30" cedar tree with old fence wire,
8. S 67051'06"W 707.81 feet to the point of beginning
This document was prepared under 22 TAC §663.21, does not reflect the results of an on the ground
survey, and is not to be used to convey or establish interests in real property except those rights and
interests implied or established by the creation or reconfiguration of the boundary of the political
subdivision for which it was prepared.
Bearings cited hereon based on Grid N rth as Statq Plane Coordinate System (Central Zone) NAD83.
Clyde C. Castleberry, Jr., R.P.L.S.
Castleberry Surveying, Ltd.
3613 Williams Drive, Suite 903
Georgetown, Texas 78628
_ger C. IGASP t:B�_i ,v.fP"
.,�`° 483: ►:'
V,
4 'd.
V,
S:12010 PROJECTS110020 J.D. Wolf Properties. LM120 acreslDOCS1FlELD NOTES110020-01_OVERALL.doc
37-l9 -- ZS=OL - OLOZ '20 4-0 6Mp'LOOLOLOZ-AilONB-iiv8a o OZOOL \8Z9-46119^d�V\dwal\L^•SIVOOI\B77a�9\L^3W0000\ O 3-11A ONLMVHCI
N
_g
W
o
M<
'z
N
U
Z
sage
$
swarf
$
U
o °N
€°d
�`
3
adoin
m
Q
u
o 00
w
y
ie
WQ
n
a
m
prwn� i
•� o
W
N°
°wa�a
i Ln
7H
UI
o
N
NN
u
` N
°
2
1
a
W�
Z Z
O0
$o
U
°
3
QZ
M
•o
(nu)
1=-J
3a.rc
J
n
WN
sW:a
z
zo
�N
p
°OU
U
U)
��
a'�
k
00
W
K
\Q
v
N
g
0
V7
y N
o°
N
by
mN mN
N
�
w
W
ir
d
q
9
U
�•Y�
m
a
09
sed
�rc
(Y
LO
g
8
N 3
i
°
o$W
N a
pN
M1
ry
�zna
Waw
O
a
q8
Z p
O >
] -d 6
¢ 2
3nmgd
;
'�5 m � �
k
'��
� •�
z
D°ci
�w3
a0K
i 33
sWg�
W
�
Oma�p
u�
°dao
0
¢ Va
�v
o3
5
U
�
•f+�oi-. 6
c�$
6� 0€
�0
U
'� w
a��N.
N
50 n
q _ S
N N
e
222
ki -S'1ir
ow
a
XQTr
FZNrc
.'oN
2 0 o
m�
29a
-rJ
Z O
22
F
•
�Iti
aS
3
2 1
L9
mm 3$ rn 8
OOa •PiDCN
a �'��
�2
a
ono
rQn
p��
;iz
.UO
Oam3
°
J
3:.
y
ZwZO
a3U
ZOp
1/
O
M j
a it n o2
o
mONo
aSkWQao
❑ a
Vo
o�
o
=
o
o6'
�2pO'
O
3
O
ig'or
=N
aSFd,
zwWina
Ntt r
JF
zwo d �$
oaw
NZ
Wm
a
U
°F,
WOr
wz
m
a
U
37-l9 -- ZS=OL - OLOZ '20 4-0 6Mp'LOOLOLOZ-AilONB-iiv8a o OZOOL \8Z9-46119^d�V\dwal\L^•SIVOOI\B77a�9\L^3W0000\ O 3-11A ONLMVHCI
_,= a= m mmLOLOZ-m_O-O ZOOL __a_&� , _#� _� __a
�
C4]
Q
w
z
G
|
\
$
�|
I
22
&
' &■
|
b
,;
d�
E r$
\
z
OD
50
°
k k
�!..
�]
■
LL
.
0
\
0
)
2
!
§
§§
§#4#§4#4m*#§*##*t&k§w»»4>»�-»4
=!lE,4§l�,e!*we=§¥
§)
\((\\\(((\\\\\
|;)
|2](§[|§§§((§§§[§§[|
_
|�\
�����������������������. z
§E
|; „ :l:::§§§]4§§§�§
§\
§;
_,= a= m mmLOLOZ-m_O-O ZOOL __a_&� , _#� _� __a
Gatlin Creek Development
Project Yields
February 9, 2011
Land Use
mmercia
Office
Multi -Family
Clubhouse
Residential
G
Total Property: 121.6 ac
Total
78,000 sf
280 units
1,000 sf
228 units
NOTE: THIS INFORMATION IS BASED ON ASSUMPTIONS AND ESTIMATES AND REPRESENTS NO
REGULATORY APPROVALS. Plan allocation are subject to change.
S3�:jnib'�izi ivj iVN JNUSIX3
O
�8
Oto
JUE)Wd®lanaa ilun pauueld =
JaaaO uslle!D I�
� if.�
{^vim s a
LGL
Q
a
SllVi1 ]4 DENNJIS
luawdolanad iiun pauueld
JaaaO u1112E) LM -1
z
0
a
O
z
U
cn
z
a
0
w
11
Z Z
(D C�
U) U)
Z Z
W W
Z Z
CW cW
G G
a EL
O O
J J
W W
W W
Y Y
W W
W W
U U
Z Z
J J
Q Q
(D
00
H
LL
00
w
U
a
LL
Z
U)
LL
O
H
x
c9
w
x
U)
Z
V)
N
Z
g
CL
W