HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 04.26.2005 CC-RThe City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, met in Regular Session on the above date with Mayor
Gary Nelon presiding.
Council Present. Council Absent.
Doug Smith, Mayor Pro Tem, Patty Eason, Farley
Snell, Gabe Sansing, John Kirby, Ben Oliver,
Henry Carr
Staff Present.
Paul E. Brandenburg, City Manager, Tom Yantis, Assistant City Manager; Jim Briggs, Assistant City
Manager for Utility Operations; Patricia E. Carls, City Attorney; Shirley J. Rinn, Deputy City Secretary;
Keith Hutchinson, Public Information Officer; Bobby Ray, Interim Director of Community Development
and Chief Planner; Eric Lashley, Library Director, Ed Polasek, Chief Long -Range Planner; David Munk,
Development Engineer; Melissa McCollum, Development Planner; Glenn Dishong, Water Services
Manager; Mark Miller, Transportation Services Manager, Mike Mayben, Energy Services Manager,
Laurie Brewer, Controller, Randy Morrow, Community Services Director, Terry Jones, Purchasing
Director, TravisMcLain, Airport Manager, Carla Benton, Development Planner, David Morgan, Police
Chief, Cherie Vasquez, Administrative Assistant, Evelyn McLain, Police Officer, Jack Lacy, Police Officer,
David Munk, Development Engineer
A Sec.551.071: Consultation with Attorney
- Pending or Threatened Litigation
- Legal Advice Regarding Agenda Items and other Matters
B Sec.551.072 Deliberation on Real Property
- Discussion and possible action concerning the purchase of right of way and easements for improvements to SH29
C Sec.551.086 Public Power Utility Competitive Matters
- Council consideration and possible action to approve a negotiated settlement with TXU for transition charges as related
to SB7
D Sec.551.087: Deliberations Regarding Economic Development Negotiations
- Discussion or deliberation regarding commercial or financial information that the City has received from a business
prospect that the City seeks to have locate, stay, or expand in or near the territory of the City and with which the City is
conducting economic development negotiations
- Potential abatements and incentives for prospective downtown development projects
Regular Session = To begin no earlier than 06.00 P
(Council may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene an Executive Session at the request of
the Mayor, a Councilmember, or the City Manager for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act,
Texas Government Code Chapter 551.)
City Council Meeting Minutes/April 26, 2005
Page 1 of 12 Pages
G Comments from the dais
- Welcome to Audience and Opening Comments -- Mayor Gary Nelon
- Review of new procedure for addressing the City Council
- Proclamation for Explorer Post 152
H Announcements and Comments from City Manager
All City of Georgetown and Chisholm Trail Special Utility District water customers are requested to suspend all outside water use from 9
a.m. on Wednesday, April 27 until 7 a.m. on Friday, April 29 due to a scheduled repair on the intake pipe at the Lake Georgetown Water
Treatment Plant. For additional information, contact Georgetown Utility Systems at (512) 930-3555 or Chisholm Trail at (254) 793-31039
and press 2. For more specific details about the repair, please refer to the City's website at www.georgetown.org.
The City will hold elections for Mayor and the City Council seats for District 2 and District 6 on May 7, 2005.
There is an item on the election ballot for a proposed 1/4 -cent sales tax. For more information about propositions related to the sales tax
election, please refer to the City's website at www,georgetown.org.
Because of the renovations to the Williamson County Courthouse, the Main early voting location has been moved to the Lobby of the City
of Georgetown Municipal CourtlCouncil Chamber, 101 E. 7th Street, Georgetown, Texas, and the Branch early voting will take place at the
GISD Administration Building located at 603 Lakeway Drive, Georgetown, Texas beginning on April 20th through May 3rd. Please contact
the City Secretary at 930-3652 or refer to our website at www.georgetown.org for more information regarding specific times for early voting
and Election Day Voting.
A Community Grand Opening for the new Animal Shelter will be held on Saturday, April 30 from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Doug
Smith and other City Council members will help to cut the ribbon on the new shelter at 11 a.m. Tours and entertainment will follow.
There were no speakers
J Action from Executive Session
Motion by Smith, second by Kirby to approve the final Transition Charge Reimbursement Agreement with
TXU Electric Delivery Company in settlement of PUC Docket No. 27891, and to authorize the Mayor to sign
the relevant documents and take other acts as necessary to finalize the settlement for the City. Approved
7-0.
Motion by Smith, second by Oliver to authorize the staff to move forward in preparing an agreement with
the owners or developers of the property located at 500 South Austin Avenue consistent with the direction
given by Council to staff in Executive Session last night, and to bring back a draft Agreement for Council's
consideration and approval, Approved 7-0.
Motion by Smith, second by Carr to authorize the staff to move forward in preparing an agreement with the
owners or developers of the property located at 1102 South Austin Avenue consistent with the direction
given by Council to staff in Executive Session last night, and to bring back a draft Agreement for Council's
consideration and approval.
Mayor Nelon recused himself from this item
s •
Statutory Consent Agenda
K Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes of the Council Workshop on Monday, April 11,
and the regular Council Meeting on Tuesday, April 12, 2005 -- Shirley J. Rinn, Deputy City Secretary and
Sandra D. Lee, City Secretary
L Consideration and possible action to terminate the Social Service Agreement with the Georgetown Area
United Way for the Home Repair Program and approval of an Amended Social Service Agreement with
the Caring Place to include the Home Repair Program -- Paul E: Brandenburg, City Manager
Question to make sure that there would still be an accounting. Brandenburg
M Consideration of and possible action to authorize the Mayor to execute a Lease Agreement with the U.S.
Department of Transportation, FAA for the City property used to operate a Remote Transmitter /
Receiver -Outlet (RTR-O) at the Georgetown Municipal Airport -- Travis McLain, Airport Manager and Tom
Yantis, Assistant City Manager
City Council Meeting Minutes/April 26, 2005
Page 2 of 12 Pages
N Consideration and possible action to amend a contract between the City of Georgetown and Kasberg,
Patrick and Associates, L.L.P. for professional services relating to Hacias Los Lobos in the amount of
$22,500.00 -- Mark Miller, Transportation Services Manager
0 Consideration and possible action to approve of the payment to Williamson County for the City's portion of
the annual maintenance and operation of the 800 Mhz radio system for fiscal year 04/05 in the amount of
$32,542.57 -- Terry Jones, Purchasing Director and Micki Rundell, Director of Finance and Administration
Motion by Snell, second by Eason to approve the Consent Agenda with a correction to the minutes in Item
K. Approved 7-0.
P Discussion and possible action regarding the City of Georgetown's Annexation Policy, including an
overview of Annexation issues, a review of the Annexation Priority Map, the Annexation Matrix, the
Annexation Cost Benefit Analysis/Economic Model, and a discussion on a Council Annexation Statement
and Policy -- Paul E. Brandenburg, City Manager
Brandenburg addressed the council regarding the workshop that was held regarding Annexation and went
over the need for land use control and went over the priority areas on the proposed Annexation Map.
Brandenburg told Council that staff would like direction regarding the Annexation Map and the areas that
Council would like to see included in the priority areas.
Motion by Snell, second by Eason to adopt the "Annexation Policy: Voluntary Annexation Process," as
updated April 21, 2005, including Appendices A ("Annexation Priority Map"), B ("Annexation Matrix"), and C
(the format for an "Impact Summary")
Brandenburg clarified that this would approve the annexation policy and annexation process that staff has
been working on for the past two years. He clarified that there will need to be a separate motion to add
priority areas to the annexation map. There was clarification that this includes the cost/benefit analysis.
Approved 7-0.
Motion by Snell, second Sansing to also request that staff prepare an Annexation Plan providing a list of
areas to be unilaterally annexed, using the primarily green areas on the Annexation Priority Map, and with
specific attention to transit oriented development properties associated with the commuter rail station and
areas with potential for conservation subdivision development.
Motion to Amend by Smith, second by Carr that the corridor from one (1) mile north of and including the
junction at the intersection at State Highway 195, State Highway 130 and IH -35 and south along the State
Highway 130 corridor to the City of Georgetown's current ETJ boundary be included in the green areas on
the Annexation Map.
There was a clarification that these requests would include some of the red areas on the current map and
that staff would prepare a plan based on these requests and then let Council know what the limitations to
annexation would be for those requests, including ETJ issues, utility and infrastructure limitations, and
police and fire.
Further discussion regarding the differences between the processes for voluntary and involuntary
annexations.
W.:.
Motion to Amend by Smith, second by Carr to bring in Gary Ranch and Escalara by some means, either
by a strip down the river corridor or down the Leander Road corridor to bring that western area into the City
Limits. Approved 7-0.
Motion to Amend
by Smith, second
by Carr
to include all
of
Williams Drive, such that we don't have the
condition that part
of Williams Drive
is in the
City and
part
of
it
is in
the County.
Clarification that some parts of Serenada could be included by 1,000 feet, which is the minimum.
Approved 7-0.
Motion to Amend by Kirby, second by Sansing to include
areas where
utility infrastructure is
already place
to tracts that run primarily around the airport that front the
frontage road
on IH -35. Approved
7-0.
City Council Meeting Minutes/April 26, 2005
Page 3 of 12 Pages
Motion to Amend by Ca,., second by Kirby to include the area in the High..4 195 corridor from IH -35
northwest to the limits of the City's present ETJ. Approved 7-0.
Motion to Amend by Smith, second by Carr to include that area along Highway 29 west from the
McClester tract to the Shadow Canyon Subdivision. Approved 7-0.
Discussion whether or not all rural areas are prime choices for conservation subdivision and a clarification
that staff would have wide latitude to look at it all and make recommendations not only as to conservation
subdivision, but also regular subdivisions based on the land types. Council clarified that it is just giving staff
some parameters to look at, but that staff is not limited to them.
Snell asked to insert the word "primarily" green areas in original motion, Sansing agreed.
There was also a clarification that the rural properties being discussed were large unsubdivided tracts.
Motion to Amend by Carr, second by Oliver to include areas along IH -35 south of town up the Southwest
Bypass corridor to Hwy 29.
Discussion regarding the long-term strategic importance of this area and the importance of having it in the
City's planning window for possible economic development. Approved 6-1 (Smith opposed).
Clarification that staff has the authorization to look at exceptions as well.
Further discussion regarding conservation subdivision.
Q Consideration and possible action regarding a Resolution of intent to participate in a tax abatement for
Tumco Tool & Instrument, Inc. — Mark Thomas, Economic Development Director and Paul Brandenburg,
City Manager
Rundell addressed the Council and described the type of business Turnco Tool operates and read the
caption of the Resolution.
Motion by Carr, second by Smith to approve a Resolution of intent to participate in a tax abatement for
Turnco Tool & Instrument, Inc. Approved 7-0.
R Consideration and possible action regarding a resolution regarding requirements for recognition of
financial donations to the City of Georgetown Public Library -- Eric Lashley, Library Director and Randy
Morrow, Director of Community Services
Lashley described the item to Council. He told Council that he was also representing the Friends of the
Library and Library Foundation and described some possible ways to recognize large donors for
contributions. He said that one of the recognition methods would be to name the building after a large
benefactor, which would be a new territory for the City. He said that the closest City Policy would be the
one it has for naming of parks after people. Further discussion regarding the use of public funds to build the
building and the ramifications of naming a building after one individual even though public funds were also
used to build it. Further discussion regarding the use of hard figures in the Resolution and whether that
would bind everything to the specific terms in the Resolution. Additional discussion regarding the
importance to set levels for donors and having the ability to bring an item to Council for further deliberation
if there were additional difficulty with regard to a donation, or opportunity to negotiate the terms of a
donation. The Council also had further discussion as to whether it would want to leave the option open to
name the Library after an individual and more discussion regarding the use of the public funds being used
to build the building. The Council also discussed the possibility of including wording in the Resolution that
would require the naming of items having Council approval. Discussion regarding the concepts used in
naming parks.
Motion by Snell, second by Eason to remove Distinguished Benefactor line from Resolution.
Additional discussion regarding the possibility of qualifying the $5,000,000 level of gift as being acceptable
if it were used toward the retirement of the debt. Additional discussion regarding the use of a large gift for
any other use other than building the building, such as purchasing land.
Motion Falls 5-2. (Carr, Oliver, Smith, Kirby, Sansing opposed)
City Council Meeting Minutes/April 26, 2005
Page 4 of 12 Pages
Motion
by Snell, second
...,by
that the level of gift of $5,000,000,
which wu_.J bean appropriate gift to the
naming
of the Library, be
used
for the retirement of that portion of
the bond.
Approved 4-3 (Smith, Oliver, Carr opposed)
Discussion regarding the process for making decisions regarding acceptance of donations.
Motion by Kirby, second by Sansing to approve a Resolution regarding requirements for recognition of
financial donations to the City of Georgetown Public Library, as amended. Approved 7-0.
S Consideration and possible action to authorize the Mayor to appoint a committee to review the City's
current impact fee structure and recommend to Council a revised structure -- Glenn Dishong, Water
Services Manager and Jim Briggs, Assistant City Manager for Utility Operations
Jim Briggs addressed the council and explained the need to appoint this committee to review the City's
current impact fee structure.
Motion by Carr, second by Smith to appoint a committee comprised of the current Georgetown Utility
Systems Advisory Board members who are not current Council Members, and including Mr. Marion Jones,
an ETJ citizen at large, to review the City's current Impact fee structure and recommend to Council a
revised structure. Approved 7-0.
T Consideration and possible action on a Public Review Final Plat for 31.31 acres in the Joseph Fish, Leroy
B. Lord, and William Roberts Surveys to be known as the Georgetown Village Planned Unit
Development, Section Six, located along Village Commons Boulevard -- Carla Benton, Development
Planner and Bobby Ray, Interim Director of Planning and Development
Benton explained the item to the Council and told Council that this is the third this item has come back to
Council
Motion by Kirby, second by Smith to approve a Public Review Final Plat for 31.31 acres in the Joseph Fish,
Leroy B. Lord, and William Roberts Surveys to be known as the Georgetown Village Planned Unit
Development, Section Six, located along Village Commons Boulevard. Approved 7-01
U Consideration and possible action on a Vacation of the Replat of Cimarron Hills, P.U.D., Phase 3,
Section 1, located on Cimarron Hills Trail West -- Carla Benton, Development Planner and Bobby Ray,
Interim Director of Planning and Development
Benton explained the item to Council and told them that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended
the vacation.
Motion by Sansing,
second
by
Smith to
approve the vacation of the
Replat of Cimarron Hills, P.U.D.,
Phase 3, Section 1,
located
on
Cimarron
Hills Trail West. Approved
7-0.
V Consideration and possible action on a Public Review Final Plat for 6.690 acres in the Fredrick Foy
Survey to be known as the Planned Unit Development of Sun City Georgetown, Neighborhood
Twenty -Eight, located along Dove Hollow Trail -- Melissa McCollum, Development Planner and Bobby Ray,
Interim Director of Planning and Development
McCallum explained the item to Council and told them that the Planning & Zoning Commission
recommended approval.
Motion by Carr, second by Sansing to approve a Public Review Final Plat for 6.690 acres in the Fredrick
Foy Survey to be known as the Planned Unit Development of Sun City Georgetown, Neighborhood
Twenty -Eight, located along Dove Hollow Trail. Approved 7-0.
W Consideration and possible action on a Public Review Final Plat for 26.365 acres in the Fredrick Foy
Survey, to be known as the Planned Unit Development of Sun City Georgetown, Neighborhood
Twenty -Nine, located on Armstrong Drive -- Melissa McCallum, Development Planner and Bobby Ray,
Interim Director of Planning and Development
McCollum explained the item to Council and told them that the Planning & Zoning Commission
recommended approval.
Motion by Carr, second by Smith to approve a Public Review Final Plat for 26.365 acres in the Fredrick Foy
City Council Meeting Minutes/April 26, 2005
Page 5 of 12 Pages
Survey,
to be
known as s. , Planned
Unit Development
of Sun City Georgk m, Neighborhood
Twenty -Nine,
located on Armstrong
Drive. Approved
7-0.
X Consideration and possible action on a Public Review Final Plat for 45.399 acres in the Fredrick Foy
Survey, to be known as the Planned Unit Development of Sun City Georgetown, Neighborhoods
Twenty -Two and Twenty -Three, located off Sun City Boulevard north of Armstrong Drive -- Melissa
McCollum, Development Planner and Bobby Ray, Interim Director of Planning and Development
McCollum explained the item to Council and told them that the Planning & Zoning Commission
recommended approval.
Motion by Carr, second by Smith to approve a Public Review Final Plat for 45.399 acres in the Fredrick Foy
Survey, to be known as the Planned Unit Development of Sun City Georgetown, Neighborhoods
Twenty -Two and Twenty -Three, located off Sun City Boulevard north of Armstrong Drive. Approved 7-0.
Y Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for 77.919 acres in the William Roberts Survey to
be known as Reserve at Berry Creek, Sections 2, 31 4, and 5, located along Shinnecock Hills Drive and
Logan Road -- Melissa McCollum, Development Planner and Bobby Ray, Interim Director of Planning and
Development
The Mayor recused himself from this item and left the dais.
McCollum explained the item to Council and told them that is confident that the UDC requirements have
been met and that staff is recommending approval.
Discussion regarding whether or not this item should be deferred to give the Applicant the opportunity to
work out something that would be acceptable to the neighborhood regarding the configuration and
placement of the park. Councilmember Kirby provided a presentation to the Council regarding this item.
Motion by Kirby, second by Carr to defer this item for two weeks
A representative of the Developer addressed the Council regarding the Preliminary Plat and explained why
the developer felt the configuration of the park was beneficial to the public interest and that approval was
recommended by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, the Planning and Zoning Commission and
staff.
Discussion regarding the trees on the acreage and the underground utilities in the easement next to the
parkland. Additional discussion regarding the construction traffic and how it enters into the area. The
Developer indicated that they would work out an agreement as to the construction traffic. There was
additional discussion regarding guarantees regarding restrictions encroachment of private owners to parks
and vice versa.
Motion Fails. 6-1. (Sansing, Carr, Oliver, Snell, Smith, Eason apposed)one else opposed)
Motion by Sansing, second by Carr to approve the park as part of this plat.
Motion to Amend by Smith, second by Snell to make the construction entrance through the back of Berry
Creek. Approved 7-0
Smith Called the Question on original motion.
I -.
Recessed at 7:30 pm.
Reconvened at 7:40pm
Z Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for 31.10 acres out of the Nicholas Porter Survey
to be known as Dedicated Investments Subdivision Number 1, located on Northwest Boulevard --Melissa
McCollum, Development Planner and Bobby Ray, Interim Director of Planning and Development
McCollum explained the item to Council and told them that staff and the Planning & Zoning Commission
both recommended approval.
Discussion regarding maintenance of these types of developments.
City Council Meeting Minutes/April 26, 2005
Page 6 of 12 Pages
Motion by Smith, secom.. y Snell to approve a Preliminary Plat for 31,10't.. as out of the Nicholas Porter
Survey to be known as Dedicated Investments Subdivision Number 1, located on Northwest Boulevard,
Approved 4-3. (Carr, Sansing, Kirby opposed)
There was a request from Council to see actual votes from Advisory Boards on the Coversheets.
1. Second Reading of an ordinance Rezoning 6.690 acres in the Fredrick Foy Survey from AG,
Agriculture District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District to be known as the Planned Unit
Development of Sun City Georgetown, Neighborhood Twenty -Eight, located along Dove Hollow
Trail -- Melissa McCollum, Development Planner and Bobby Ray, Interim Director of Planning and
Development.
McCollum explained the item and read only the caption on second reading. Motion by Carr, second by
Smith to approve Ordinance 2005-21. Approved 7-0.
2. Second Reading of an ordinance Rezoning 26.365 acres in the Fredrick Foy Survey from AG,
Agriculture District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District, to be known as the Planned Unit
Development of Sun City Georgetown, Neighborhood Twenty -Nine, located on Armstrong Drive --
Melissa McCollum, Development Planner and Bobby Ray, Interim Director of Planning and
Development.
McCollum explained the item and read only the caption on second reading. Motion by Carr, second by
Sansing to approve Ordinance 2005-22. Approved 7-0.
3. Second Reading of an ordinance Rezoning 45.399 acres in the Fredrick Foy Survey from AG,
Agriculture District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District, to be known as the Planned Unit
Development of Sun City Georgetown, Neighborhoods Twenty -Two and Twenty -Three, located off
Sun City Boulevard north of Armstrong Drive -- Melissa McCollum, Development Planner and Bobby
Ray, Interim Director of Planning and Development.
McCollum explained the item and read only the caption on second reading. Motion by Carr, second by
Kirby to approve Ordinance 2005-23, Approved 7-0,
4. Second reading of an ordinance annexing into the City for 45.399 acres, more or less, in the Frederick
Foy Survey, north of Sun City Neighborhood 16, for Sun City Neighborhoods 22 and 23 — Ed
Polasek, Chief Long Range Planner and Bobby Ray, Interim Director of Planning and Development
Polasek explained the item and read only the caption on second reading. Motion by Sansing, second
by Smith to approve Ordinance 2005-24, Approved 7-0.
5. Second reading of an ordinance annexing into the City for 6.69 acres, more or less, in the Frederick
Foy Survey, north of Sun City Neighborhood 16-A, for Sun City Neighborhood 28 — Ed Polasek, Chief
Long Range Planner and Bobby Ray, Interim Director of Planning and Development
Polasek
explained the item and
read only
the caption
on second reading. Motion by Smith, second by
Sansing
to approve Ordinance
2005-25.
Approved
7-0.
6. Second reading of an ordinance annexing into the City for 26.365 acres, more or less, in the Frederick
Foy Survey, north of Sun City Neighborhood 20, for Sun City Neighborhood 29 — Ed Polasek, Chief
Long Range Planner and Bobby Ray, Interim Director of Planning and Development
Polasek explained the item and read only the caption on second reading. Motion by Kirby, second by
Carr to approve Ordinance 2005-26. Approved 7-0.
7. Second reading of an ordinance annexing into the City for 31.88 acres, more or less, in the Frederick
Foy Survey, north of Sun City Neighborhood 23 and White Wing Golf Course, for Sun City
Neighborhoods 30 — Ed Polasek, Chief Long Range Planner and Bobby Ray, Interim Director of
Planning and Development
Polasek explained the item and read only the caption on second reading. Motion by Carr, second by
Smith o approve Ordinance 2005-27, Approved 7-0.
City Council Meeting Minutes/April 26, 2005
Page 7 of 12 Pages
1. First and only reading of an Ordinance Authorizing the Issuance of City of Georgetown, Texas
Combination Tax and Utility System Limited Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 2005;
Authorizing the Levy of an Ad Valorem Tax and the Pledge of Certain Revenues in Support of the
Certificates; Approving an Official Statement, a Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement, and Other
Agreements Related to the Sale and Issuance of the Certificates; and Authorizing Other Matters
Related to the Issuance of the Certificates -- Micki Rundell, Director of Finance and Administration
Rundell introduced Gary Kimball to Council who gave a presentation to Council. He went over
highlights of the City's Financial Pricing Summary. He also told Council that if debt was going to be
issued for infrastructure, the market currently has a very attractive interest rate to do so. He told the
Council that the Bond Rating Agencies had very positive things to say about the City's financial
situation and that we will probably be looking at an upgrade in the future. He told the Council that the
agencies are looking for a little more depth to commercial and retail areas, but that the City's current
financial management is already in the AA category.
Rundell read only the caption of the ordinance on first reading after having satisfied the requirements of
the City Charter. Motion by Eason, second by Carr to approve Ordinance No. 2005-29 on first
reading. Approved 7-0.
2. First and only reading of an Ordinance Authorizing City of Georgetown, Texas Utility System Revenue
Bonds, Series 2005; Authorizing the Pledge of Certain Revenues in Support of the Bonds; Approving
and Authorizing an Official Statement, a Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement and Other Agreements
Related to the Issuance and Sale of the Bonds; and Authorizing Other Matters Related to the Issuance
of the Bonds -- Micki Rundell, Director of Finance and Administration
Rundell read only the caption of the ordinance on first reading after having satisfied the requirements of
the City Charter. Motion by Kirby , second by Oliver to approve Ordinance No. 2005-30 on first
reading. Approved 7-0.
3. First and only reading of an Ordinance Authorizing the Issuance of City of Georgetown, Texas General
Obligation and Refunding Bonds, Series 2005; Levying an Ad Valorem Tax in Support of the Bonds;
Approving a Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement, an Official Statement, a Purchase Agreement and an
Escrow Agreement; Calling Certain Obligations for Redemption; and Authorizing Other Matters
Relating to the Bonds -- Micki Rundell, Director of Finance and Administration
Rundell read only the caption of the ordinance on first reading after having satisfied the requirements of
the City Charter. Motion by Carr, second by Eason to approve Ordinance No. 2005-31 on first
reading. Approved 7-0.
4. First Reading of an Ordinance on a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Future Land
Use from Commercial and Industrial to Residential allowing multi -family use and to change the
Intensity Level from Level 3 to Level 4, for 7.53 acres known as City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlots
8, 10, and 11 to be known as the San Gabriel Senior Village, located at 1900, 1906, and 1910
Leander Street — Ed Polasek, Chief Long Range Planner and Bobby Ray, Interim Director of Planning
and Development.
Polasek explained the item to Council. This is one of the properties that has applied for Community
Development tax credits. He also told Council that the City has applied for a Community Block Grant
for some infrastructure improvements. He told Council that staff is recommending approval of this
ordinance.
Council inquired as to whether the applicant's ability to do this project was contingent on getting the
funding. The applicant, Colby Dennison, told the Council that moving forward with this project is *
contingent on approval of the funding. Listen to tape. *As corrected at 6-14-2005 Council Meeting.
Polasek read only the caption of the ordinance on first reading after having satisfied the requirements
of the City Charter. Motion by Sansing, second by Eason to approve the ordinance on first reading.
Approved 7-0.
5. Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning from C-1, Local Commercial and IN, Industrial
districts to MF, Multifamily district for 7.53 acres known as City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlots 8,
10, and 11, to be known as the San Gabriel Senior Village, located at 1900, 1906, and 1910 Leander
Street -- Bobby Ray, Interim Director of Planning and Development
Ray explained the item. Staff is supportive of the request. P&Z unanimously approved, The Public
Hearing was opened at 8:10 p.m. There were no comments. The Public Hearing was closed at 8:10
p.m.
City Council Meeting Minutes/April 26, 2005
Page 8 of 12 Pages
8. Second reading of an ordinance annexing into the City for 31.31 acres, more of less, out of the Leroy
B. Lord Survey, more particularly described as Georgetown Village Section Six — Ed Polasek, Chief
Long Range Planner and Bobby Ray, Interim Director of Planning and Development
Polasek explained the item and read only the caption on second reading. Motion by Smith, second by
Carr to approve Ordinance 2005-28. Approved 7-0.
Request from Council to not include all of the attachments on ordinances on the 2nd Readings in order
to conserve on paper.
1. First and only reading of an Ordinance Authorizing the Issuance of City of Georgetown, Texas
Combination Tax and Utility System Limited Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 2005;
Authorizing the Levy of an Ad Valorem Tax and the Pledge of Certain Revenues in Support of the
Certificates; Approving an Official Statement, a Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement, and Other
Agreements Related to the Sale and Issuance of the Certificates; and Authorizing Other Matters
Related to the Issuance of the Certificates -- Micki Rundell, Director of Finance and Administration
Rundell introduced Gary Kimball to Council who gave a presentation to Council. He went over
highlights of the City's Financial Pricing Summary. He also told Council that if debt was going to be
issued for infrastructure, the market currently has a very attractive interest rate to do so. He told the
Council that the Bond Rating Agencies had very positive things to say about the City's financial
situation and that we will probably be looking at an upgrade in the future. He told the Council that the
agencies are looking for a little more depth to commercial and retail areas, but that the City's current
financial management is already in the AA category.
Rundell read only the caption of the ordinance on first reading after having satisfied the requirements of
the City Charter. Motion by Eason, second by Carr to approve Ordinance No. 2005-29 on first
reading. Approved 7-0.
2. First and only reading of an Ordinance Authorizing City of Georgetown, Texas Utility System Revenue
Bonds, Series 2005; Authorizing the Pledge of Certain Revenues in Support of the Bonds; Approving
and Authorizing an Official Statement, a Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement and Other Agreements
Related to the Issuance and Sale of the Bonds; and Authorizing Other Matters Related to the Issuance
of the Bonds -- Micki Rundell, Director of Finance and Administration
Rundell read only the caption of the ordinance on first reading after having satisfied the requirements of
the City Charter. Motion by Kirby , second by Oliver to approve Ordinance No. 2005-30 on first
reading. Approved 7-0.
3. First and only reading of an Ordinance Authorizing the Issuance of City of Georgetown, Texas General
Obligation and Refunding Bonds, Series 2005; Levying an Ad Valorem Tax in Support of the Bonds;
Approving a Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement, an Official Statement, a Purchase Agreement and an
Escrow Agreement; Calling Certain Obligations for Redemption; and Authorizing Other Matters
Relating to the Bonds -- Micki Rundell, Director of Finance and Administration
Rundell read only the caption of the ordinance on first reading after having satisfied the requirements of
the City Charter. Motion by Carr, second by Eason to approve Ordinance No. 2005-31 on first
reading. Approved 7-0.
4. First Reading of an Ordinance on a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Future Land
Use from Commercial and Industrial to Residential allowing multi -family use and to change the
Intensity Level from Level 3 to Level 4, for 7.53 acres known as City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlots
81 10, and 11 to be known as the San Gabriel Senior Village, located at 1900, 1906, and 1910
Leander Street — Ed Polasek, Chief Long Range Planner and Bobby Ray, Interim Director of Planning
and Development.
Polasek explained the item to Council. This is one of the properties that has applied for Community
Development tax credits. He also told Council that the City has applied for a Community Block Grant
for some infrastructure improvements. He told Council that staff is recommending approval of this
ordinance.
City Council Meeting Minutes/April 26, 2005
Page 8 of 12 Pages
projectthis • on approval • of the funding. Listen to tape corrected,
Polasek read only the caption of the ordinance on first reading after having satisfied the requirements
of the City Charter. Motion by Sansing, second by Eason to approve the ordinance on first reading.
Approved 7-0.
5. Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning from C-1, Local Commercial and IN, Industrial
districts to MF, Multifamily district for 7.53 acres known as City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlots 8,
10, and 11, to be known as the San Gabriel Senior Village, located at 1900, 1906, and 1910 Leander
Street -- Bobby Ray, Interim Director of Planning and Development
Ray explained the item. Staff is supportive of the request. P&Z unanimously approved, The Public
Hearing was opened at 8:10 p.m. There were no comments. The Public Hearing was closed at 8:10
p.m.
6. First Reading of an Ordinance Rezoning from C-1, Local Commercial and IN, Industrial districts to MF,
Multifamily district for 7.53 acres known as City of Georgetown, Division A, Outlots 8, 10, and 11, to be
known as the San Gabriel Senior Village, located at 1900, 1906, and 1910 Leander Street -- Bobby
Ray, Interim Director of Planning and Development
Ray read only the caption of the ordinance on first reading after having satisfied the requirements of
the City Charter. Motion by Snell, second by Carr to approve the ordinance on first reading.
Approved 7-0.
7. Public Hearing on a Rezoning from C1, Local Commercial District to C3, General Commercial District
for 4.827 acres out of HEB / Georgetown #2 Subdivision, Block A, Lot 1, located on Wildwood Drive
(formerly Old Shell Road) east of Williams Drive -- Bobby Ray, Interim Director of Planning and
Development
Ray explained the item and told Council that staff was supportive of the rezoning request, but that the
Planning and Zoning Commission voted to deny the rezoning request. Ray told Council that a Super
Majority Vote is required by Council to approve this item. He told the Council that the Ordinance now
includes design standards, which it previously did not have included.
The Public Hearing was opened at 8:15 p.m.
Johnny Anderson, Chairman of the Planning & Zoning Commission, addressed the Council and told
them that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted against this request because they felt it was an
inappropriate use of the C-1. They felt like a 3 -story self -storage facility was in appropriate. Said that
he saw one of these "upscale" facilities in Houston and still feels it was inappropriate.
There was further discussion that subsequent to the vote at Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting,
the design and appearance of the building was not tied to the ordinance, but that now the Applicant has
committed to a particular design. Mr. Anderson indicated that the primary objection to the zoning was
the use in that location, not necessarily design.
Steve Metcalf, representing the applicant gave a PowerPoint presentation regarding their plans to
rezone to C-3, which is really only one additional use permit, which is the storage facility use. Applicant
is agreeable to meeting the design standards. He also addressed temporary/convenient storage
buildings in general and how they are generally unattractive. However, he said that it is a low activity
use and not much traffic to disrupt the areas around it. He told Council that this property will look
different than self -storage has looked in the past. He told council that it is not a true 3 -story building.
He also gave an overview of the landscaping that will be attached to the zoning ordinance. He told the
Council that the only thing the public will see is the facade. He told Council that this facility is not going
to be directly visible from Williams Drive and that there are other uses that will surround it, i.e.
restaurants and office space. He also gave a detailed description of how the storage facility will be
accessed and how it will look. He did indicate that the presentation he was showing to the Council was
different than the one that the Planning and Zoning Commission saw. He also told the Council that to
the extent the Applicant had any grandfathered zoning rights, they would waive them. He showed
Council renderings of the project and told Council that the development will be built in accordance to
the renderings.
Public Hearing Closed 8:35pm.
8. First Reading of an Ordinance Rezoning from C1, Local Commercial District to C3, General
Commercial District for 4.827 acres out of HEB / Georgetown #2 Subdivision, Block A, Lot 1, located on
City Council Meeting Minutes/April 26, 2005
Page 9 of 12 Pages
Wildwood Drive (fc Orly Old Shell Road) east of Williams Drive -- E_ ay Ray, Interim Director of
Planning and Development
Ray read only the
caption
of
the ordinance
on
first reading after having satisfied
the requirements of
the City Charter.
Motion
by
Kirby, second
by
Carr to approve the
ordinance
on
first reading.
Discussion regarding concern about overriding the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning
Commission. Additional discussion regarding multi -use and how the drawings help get a better idea of
how it is going to look.
9. Public Hearing to Consider Amending the following Sections of the Unified Development Code
(UDC): 1.14; Table 2.01.020; 2.02.010; 2.04.010; 3.08.050(J); 3.13(E); 3.16; 4.06.020(A); Table
5.01.020; 5.02.120; 5.02.140(B)(1)(C); 6.01.030(B); Table 6.03.020; 7.04.030(C)(1); 8.02.020; 8.05;
Table 9.02.030(A); 9.02.060(E)(2); 10.03.020(B); 10.03.020(C); 10.03.020(x); 10.03.020(M);
10.06.030(C)(1); 10.06.040; 10.06.050; 11.02.020(A)(3); 11.03.050; 11.03.060(A); 11.03.060(B);
11.05.030(F); 12.02.020; 12.03.010; 12.04.020; 13.01; 13.05.010; 13.07; 16.04 AND 16.05 -- Bobby
Ray, Interim Director of Planning and Development
Ray explained the item. The Public Hearing was opened at 8:40p.m. There were no comments.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of all of the amendments as proposed
with exception of Item #5 (UDC Section 3.08.050 (J)).
Ronnie Rigden addressed the Council and told them that he hopes to be a future resident in
Georgetown and that he is in favor of the Amendment of UDC Section 13.01.050 and that as it
currently stands now it would be cost prohibitive for him to subdivide his property and build a home.
Richard Cuts addressed the Council and wants to thank staff for including citizens in the process and
that the Georgetown Heritage Society is supportive of the proposed change in Section 4.06.020,
Renee Hanson addressed Council and told that she generally supports the amendments and
especially downtown. She also says that she likes the current amendment process and appreciates
the public process.
The Public Hearing was closed at 8:43 p.m.
10. First Reading of an Ordinance Amending the following Section of the Unified Development Code
(UDC): 1.14; Table 2.01.020; 2.02.010; 2.04.010; 3.08.050(J); 3.13(E); 3.16; 4.06,020(A); Table
5.01.020; 5.02.120; 5.02.140(B)(1)(C); 6.01.030(8); Table 6.03.020; 7.04.030(C)(1); 8.02.020; 8.05;
Table 9.02.030(A); 9.02.060(E)(2); 10.03.020(8); 10.03.020(C); 10.03.020(x); 10.03.020(M);
10.06.030(C)(1); 10.06.040; 10.06.050; 11.02.020(A)(3); 11.03.050; 11.03.060(A); 11.03.060(B);
11.05.030(F); 12.02.020; 12.03.010; 12.04.020; 13.01; 13.05.010; 13.07; 16.04 AND 16.05 -- Bobby
Ray, Interim Director of Planning and Development
Ray read only the caption of the ordinance on first reading after having satisfied the requirements of
the City Charter.
Mayor proposed to that the Council treat the process of this item like a consent agenda, where by if
there are concerns or questions about an amendment that they be pulled out for discussion.
Items #5, #8, #39 were pulled for discussion.
Council also has questions regarding #121 34, 37, 38 & 39.
Discussion
regarding Item #
12.
Ray
clarified
that
this amendment would allow a monument sign in
addition to
building signage
and
what
it
would
look
like.
There was discussion regarding items #34, 37 & 38 as to whether or not these exemptions, if passed,
would be automatically retroactive, or whether we would need take each one separately. Carls told the
Council that you can't make an amendment retroactive and that if someone's final plat had already
been approved then they couldn't go back. However, if they are still in the review process that there
are state law provisions that will allow a developer to take advantage of newly adopted provisions in a
code. There were discussions regarding two specific plats that are in the process and Carls indicated
that staff could look at each of these cases on an individual basis and work with the applicants.
City Council Meeting Minutes/April 26, 2005
Page 10 of 12 Pages
There was discussion regarding parkland dedication and concerns about affordable housing with
regard to Item #38. McCollum told Council that staff tried to be consistent with the parkland and
sidewalks and that staff could look at each one on an individual basis with regard to the parkland
requirements.
Council discussed the reasons for pulling Item #5. The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended pulling it because staff recommended that it be pulled because there was confusion as
to what the purpose of the amendment was and it appeared to be covered under other provisions. Ray
said that it was on the list because it was one of the amendments that was mentioned to be placed on
the list.
Motion to Amend by Snell, second Carr to remove Item #5 from the Summary List [UDC Section
3.08.050 (J)]. Approved 7-0.
Discussion regarding Item #8 [UDC Section 4.06.020 (A)] allowing an increase to 40 foot height
restriction with HARC approval. Discussion whether or not we have really gained anything by sending it
to HARC for approval and whether there would be a way to increase the height restriction to 45 feet.
Staff clarified that buildings higher than 40 feet could be allowed, but that it would need HARC approval
and meet certain criteria.
Motion to Amend by Smith, second by Sansing that would allow for buildings in the Downtown Overlay
District that do not face the square to exceed 40 feet if for every foot over 40 foot there would be an
equivalent foot setback without HARC approval.
Staff clarified that this proposal would be more restrictive than the current language and would replace
the language that is currently listed. Additional clarification that in order for a building to go above 40
feet without the setbacks, it would need HARC approval, but if there were the equivalent setbacks, then
HARC approval would not be needed for approval of the height of the building. Additional clarification
that HARC would not be able to reject a design based on height, but that HARC approval would be
needed for other components of the proposed designs. Further clarification that this would be for
buildings that do not face the Courthouse.
Motion Fails (Eason, Kirby, Snell, Oliver opposed)
Detailed discussion that there is a need to clarify the procedural aspects of the language in 4.06.020
Downtown Overlay District Standards and the need for a "findings" list. Staff will bring back a language
change at second reading to clarify the language.
Clarification of the language in Section 4.06.020(A)(4), as well as the need to generate a list of specific
buildings that are on the National Register.
Discussion regarding Item #39 [UDC Section 13.07]. Staff told Council that this amendment was
brought forward at the request of the County in response to the Interlocal Agreement with the
Williamson County for the City to be the sole reviewer of plats in the ETJ under the UDC guidelines. He
said the street lighting requirements were the only provision where a conflict was found, and that the
County asked that staff bring this amendment before the Council for consideration as a compromise.
Motion by Snell, second by Eason to approve an Ordinance Amending the following Section of the
Unified Development Code (UDC): 1.14; Table 2.01.020; 2.02.010; 2.04.010; 3.08.050(J); 3.13(E);
3.16; 4.06.020(A); Table 5.01.020; 5.02.120; 5.02.140(B)(1)(C); 6.01.030(B); Table 6.03.020;
7.04.030(C)(1); 8.02.020; 8.05; Table 9.02.030(A); 9.02.060(E)(2); 10.03.020(B); 10.03.020(C);
10.03.020(x); 10.03.020(M); 10.06.030(C)(1); 10.06.040; 10.06.050; 11.02.020(A)(3); 11.03.050;
11.03.060(A); 11.03.060(B); 11.05.030(F); 12.02.020; 12.03.010; 12.04.020; 13.01; 13.05.010; 13.07;
16.04 AND 16.05 , as amended. Approved 7-0.
CC Discussion and possible action regarding review of the City Council's current policy on Community/Social
Service Funding and its current Funding Guidelines for Social Service Funding -- Farley Snell,
Councilmember
Discussion regarding the City's current Funding Guidelines and Snell's recommendations for new
guidelines for the 2005-06 Budget Year
Motion by Snell, second by Smith to change the Council's guidelines to the following:
City Council Meeting Minutes/April 26, 2005
Page 11 of 12 Pages
(1) If the amount avz, ie in the 2005-2006 budget for social services +ot greater than in 2004-2005,
agencies that were funded in 2004-2005 and fulfilled the requirements of their grants may be funded
for the same services and in the same amount for 2005-2006.
(2) If the amount available in the 2005-2006 budget for social services is greater than in 2004-2005,
grants to 2004-2005 recipients may be increased and awards to new applicants may be made based
on direct services for physical needs, such as food, medical care, shelter, safety, and transportation.
Discussion regarding whether or not the recommendation for the Funding Guidelines could be interpreted
as an "entitlement". There was additional clarification that the Funding Guidelines are not part of the City
Council's current Community/Social Service Funding Policy and that they are just working guidelines and
that the Council isn't bound by them. Council clarified that the whole Council would have to approve the
individual amounts awarded each budget year and that it wasn't a given that they would be awarded.
Further discussion whether or not we need to restate our current policy and whether or not the guidelines
needed to be in the actual policy. Approved 7-0.
Motion to Adjourn by Kirby, second Carr.
These minutes were compiled by Deputy City Secretary Shirley Rinn.
The meeting was adjourned at 09:20 PM.
City Council Meeting Minutes/April 26, 2005
Page 12 of 12 Pages
Shirley Rinn, Deputy
Meeting Date Y 12- Ve
Agenda- m No. 3A.'4 �17�cd✓i &v_'— &9: 4Yice j 46 s ti rv4
STATE OF TEXAS }
CONFLICT OF INTEREST AFFIDAVIT
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON }
,reside at `o®
t3,
am a member o the Ccs;.. f L -(Citjf Council or name of City board,
committee or commission)o City of Georgetown, and I hereby make this affidavit and on my oath state the following:
"I, and/or a person or business entity whose interest is imputed to me under Chapter 171 of the Local Government Code and/or
Chapter 2.20 of the City of Georgetown Code of Ordinances, have a "substantial interest" in a business entity or in real property (as
defined by Chapter 171 of the Texas Local Government Code and Sec. 2.20.020.M of the City of Georgetown Code of Ordinances)
and/or an "economic interest" (as defined in Sec. 2.20.020.E of the City of Georgetown Code of Ordinances) in the matter that is
identified and described on the above -referenced agenda item.
"I have a conflict of interest in the above -referenced agenda matter for the following reason(s): (check all that are applicable).
A, "Substantial Interest"
I or a person related to me in the first or second degree have an ownership of 10% or more of the voting stock or
shares of the business entity, or have an ownership of 10% or more of the fair market value of the business entity.
I or a person
related to me in
the first or second degree have
an ownership of $15,000 or more of the fair market
value of the
business entity.
ownership or interest in real
property with
I or a person related to me in the first or second degree received funds from the business entity in excess of 10% of
my/his/her gross income for the previous year.
I or a person related
to me in
the first or second
degree have
an equitable
or legal
ownership or interest in real
property with
a
fair
market
value
of
$2,500 or
more.
B. "Economic Interest"
I or a person or entity whose interest is imputed to me under Chapter 2.20 of the City of Georgetown Code of
Ordinances have a legal or equitable interest in real or personal property or a fiduciary obligation to such property or
contractual right in such property that is more than minimal or insignificant and would be recognized by reasonable
persons to have weight in deciding a case or an issue.
Co "¢then"
�� ` For reasons other than those listed above, I have a conflict of interest (Please specify, e.g. Sec. 2.24.170 or other
reason)rSs>`e5 ti2%�a: arc~ %fig 6c",
"Upon filing of this affidavit with the recording secretary and/or the City Secretary, I affirm that I will abstain from all participation,
discussion and voting involving the matter identified in the above -referenced agenda item whatsoever.
Further, Affiant sayeth not."
Affiant's
Printed N
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared the above-named person who on oath stated that the
facts hereinabove stated are true to the best of his/her knowledge or belief.
pWDeryryp
°; YP � SHIRLEY J. FlINN
`' ' x My COMMISSION EXPIRES
'+�4 ,gym
gQ: May 26, 2005
f��
this b, day of
Notai� ub,lie"in and
County of Williamso
it1"i11M
of Texas
THIS AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE KEPT WITH THE OFFICIAL MINUTES OF THIS MEETING. IF AFFIANT HAS CHECKED ANY OF THE ITEMS UNDER
SECTION "A" RELATING TO "SUBSTANTIAL INTEREST," A COPY OF THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST ALSO BE SENT TO THE CITY SECRETARY FOR THE
CITY OF GEORGETOWN.
Conflict of Interest Affidavit
Rev. 8/25/2004
I, '' .� .
am a member 6f the
committee or commission
Meering Date y 0_6 /05
Agent' ` '+em No.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST AFFIDAVIT
reside at 450 Vr° / XL JAe .
(_ (City Council or name of City board,
City of Georgetown, and I hereby make this affidavit and on my oath state the following:
"I, and/or a person or business entity whose interest is imputed to me under Chapter 171 of the Local Government Code and/or
Chapter 2.20 of the City of Georgetown Code of Ordinances, have a "substantial interest" in a business entity or in real property (as
defined by Chapter 171 of the Texas Local Government Code and Sec. 2.20.020.M of the City of Georgetown Code of Ordinances)
and/or an "economic interest" (as defined in Sec. 2.20.020.E of the City of Georgetown Code of Ordinances) in the matter that is
identified and described on the above -referenced agenda item.
"I have a conflict of interest in the above -referenced agenda matter for the following reason(s): (check all that are applicable).
A. "Substantial Interest"
I or a person related to me in
the first or
second degree have
an ownership
of 10% or more of the voting stock or
shares of the business entity,
or have an
ownership of 10% or more of the
fair market value of the business entity.
I or a person related to me in the first or second degree have an ownership of $15,000 or more of the fair market
value of the business entity.
I or a person related to me in the first or second degree received funds from the business entity in excess of 10% of
my/his/her gross income for the previous year.
I or a person related
to me in
the first or second
degree have
an equitable
of legal
ownership or interest in real
property with a fair
market
value of $2,500 or
more.
B. "Economic Interest"
I or a person or entity whose interest is imputed to me under Chapter 2.20 of the City of Georgetown Code of
Ordinances have a legal or equitable interest in real or personal property or a fiduciary obligation to such property or
contractual right in such property that is more than minimal or insignificant and would be recognized by reasonable
persons to have weight in deciding a case or an issue.
C. "Other"
For reasons other than those listed above, I have a conflict of interest (Please specify, e.g. Sec. 2.24.170 or other
reason) e s M*°As- /S 74r
"Upon filing of this affidavit with the recording secretary and/or the City Secretary, I affirm that I will abstain from all participation,
discussion and voting involving the matter identified in the above -referenced agencJ item whatsoever.
Further, Affiant sayeth not."
Affiant's
Printed N
Date:
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared the above-named person who on oath stated that the
facts hereinabove stated are true to the best of his/her knowledge or belief.
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me on this :t % day of 2005.
€ yJ. Flll�i
;car ,sg�„ EXPI T4tgr LP in a dor the State of Texas
day 26, 2005 County of Willia son
THIS AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE KEPT WITH THE OFFICIAL MINUTES OF THIS MEETING. IF AFFIANT HAS CHECKED ANY OF THE ITEMS UNDER
SECTION "A" RELATING TO "SUBSTANTIAL INTEREST," A COPY OF THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST ALSO BE SENT TO THE CITY SECRETARY FOR THE
CITY OF GEORGETOWN.
Conflict of Interest Affidavit
Rev. 8/25/2004