Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes P&Z 09.19.2023Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission City of Georgetown, Texas Tuesday, September 19, 2023 The Georgetown Planning and Zoning Commission met on Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 6:00 PM at Council and Court Building, 510 W. 9th Street. The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA, reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact the City Secretary's Office, at least three (3) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652 or City Hall at 808 Martin Luther King, Jr Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. The following Members were in attendance: Present were: Travis Perthuis, Christopher B Stanley, Chere Heintzmann, Michael L Price, Mike Tiland, Stephen F Dickey Agenda Notice Public Wishing to Address an Advisory Board On a subiect that is posted on this ap-enda: Please fill out a speaker registra on form which can be found on the table at the entrance to the mee ng room. Clearly print your name and the le er of the item on which you wish to speak and present it to the Board Liaison prior to the start of the mee ng. You will be called forward to speak when the Board considers that item. Only persons who have delivered the speaker form prior to the mee ng being called to order may speak. Speakers will be allowed up to three minutes to speak. If you wish to speak for six minutes, it is permissible to use another requestor's granted me to speak. No more than six minutes for a speaker may be granted. The requestor gran ng me to another speaker must also submit a form and be present at the meeting. On a subiect not posted on the agenda: A request must be received by the Advisory Board or Commission Liaison prior to the day the agenda for this mee ng is posted. Each speaker will be given three minutes to address the Board or Commission members. No action can be taken at this meeting. Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Comments from the Chair Announcements Action from Executive Session 1. Statutory Consent Agenda The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non -controversial and routine items that may be acted upon with one single vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be discussed and acted upon individually as part of the Regular Session. Moved by Stephen F Dickey; seconded by Mike Tiland to Approve the consent agenda minus items 1.J, 1.K, 1.Q, 13, 1.U, 1.V, 1.W, 12. Motion Approved: 6 - 0 Voting For: Travis Perthuis, Christopher B Stanley, Chere Heintzmann, Michael L Price, Mike Tiland, Stephen F Dickey Voting Against: None LA Meeting Minutes Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes from the September 5, 2023 regular meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission -- Jessica Lemanski, Associate Planner 1.B 2023-24-PP - Woodfield Preserve Preliminary Plat- Amendment Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of approximately 144.856 acres in the 144.856 acres in the William Roberts Survey, Abstract No. 4, generally located at north and south of Shell Rd between SH 195 & FM 2338 to be known as Woodfield Preserve Amendment (2023-24-PP) -- Haley Webre, Planner 1.0 2023-26-PP - Parmer Ranch Phase 1B Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of approximately 33.12 acres in the D.H. Delaney Survey, Abstract No. 181, generally located at 1109 Somerset Meadows Way to be known as Parmer Ranch Phase 18 (2023-26-PP) — Olivia Beams, Historic and Downtown Planner 1.D 2023-30-PP - The Estates at Parmer Ranch Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of approximately 29.72 acres in the D.H. Delaney Survey Abstract No 181 Williamson County, generally located at 1109 Somerset Meadows Way to be known as The Estates at Parmer Ranch (2023-30-PP) - Travis Baird, Assistant Planning Director 1.E 2021-45-CON - Wolf Ranch West, Section 8, Phase 1 Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application for Construction Plans, consisting of approximately 2.95 acres in the Isaac Donagan, Survey, generally located at Wolf Canyon Rd to be known as Wolf Ranch West Section 8 Phase 1 (2021-45-CON) -- David Munk, PE, and Ashley Hanson, Utility Engineering 1.F 2022-21-CON - Wolf Ranch West Section 7A & 7B Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application for Construction Plans, consisting of approximately 77.77 acres in the Isaac Donagan Survey, Abstract No. 178, generally located at SW Bypass and Wolf Ranch to be known as Wolf Ranch West Section 7A and 7B 3rd Minor Revision (2022-21-CON) -- David Munk, PE, and Ashley Hanson, Utility Engineering 1.G 2023-15-PFP - Georgetown High School Number 3 Preliminary Final Plat Combo Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Preliminary Final Plat Combo, consisting of approximately 90.00 acres in the Joseph Fish Survey, Abstract No. 232, and the Isaac Donagan Survey, Abstract No. 178, generally located at 1601 D B WOOD RD to be known as Georgetown High School Number 3 Preliminary Final Plat Combo (2023-15-PFP) -- Haley Webre, Planner 1.H 2O23-36-FP - Wolf Ranch West, Section 3G Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 54.124 acres in the Joseph Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 608, generally located to the west of Jay Wolf Drive to be known as Wolf Ranch West, Section 3G (2023-36-FP) -- Haley Webre, Planner 1.I 2023-15-SWP - GTX Phase III Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application for a Stormwater Permit, consisting of Tract 1 &2 of the MJ Garcia League, Abstract No. 246, generally located at 900 FM 972 to be known as GTX Phase III (2023-15-SWP) -- David Munk, PE, Ashley Hanson, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering 1.1 2020-18-SDP - Shadow Canyon Amenity Center Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 2.98 acres in the Isaac Donagan Survey, Abstract No. 178, generally located at 5110 Whisper Creek Drive to be known as Shadow Canyon Amenity Center (2020-18-SDP) -- Travis Baird This item was pulled at the request of a Commissioner. Commissioner Heintzmann asked if the applicant removed unpermitted trees and paid mitigation. Baird explained that there were two trees shown on the Site Development Plan from 2021 which were not present upon staffs inspection of the property. The Applicant provided that the trees had been removed by Enterprise Pipeline between 2018-2020, but since they were shown on the site plan and therefore claimed by the Applicant, they were responsible for tree mitigation. Commissioner Heintzmann asked if tree mitigation fees are planned to be raised. Baird established that staff has not received direction from Council to raise the fee. Moved by Stephen F Dickey; seconded by Christopher B Stanley to Approve item U. Motion Approved: 6- 0 Voting For: Travis Perthuis, Christopher B Stanley, Chere Heintzmann, Michael L Price, Mike Tiland, Stephen F Dickey Voting Against: None 1.K 2021-78-SDP - Loram Technologies Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Minor Revision to a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 24.326 acres in the Approximately 24.326 acres out of the Lewis J. Dyches Survey, Abstract No. 180, generally located at 3502 S. Austin Ave. to be known as Loram Technologies (2021-78-SDP) -- Travis Baird, Assistant Planning Director Travis Baird approached the podium to address the Commission and established that the applicant had not met all the requirements at the time of posting, and there is a typo error in the caption of this item. Staff is requesting this item be disapproved. Baird added that the plans include revisions to trails and mitigation through additional design work, but staff found that the notations in the revision were insufficient to ensure they comply with the UDC and asked for additional information. Moved by Chere Heintzmann; seconded by Mike Tiland to Deny item 1.K. Motion Approved: 6- 0 Voting For: Travis Perthuis, Christopher B Stanley, Chere Heintzmann, Michael L Price, Mike Tiland, Stephen F Dickey Voting Against: None 1.1- 2021-87-SDP - Highland Village Multifamily Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 14.843 acres in the L.P. Dyches Survey, Abstract 171, generally located at 29600 Ronald Reagan Blvd to be known as Highland Village Multifamily (2021- 87-SDP) -- Travis Baird, Assistant Planning Director 1.M 2022-87-SDP - Lone Star Circle of Care Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 5.915 acres known as Lot 2, Final Plat of the Lone Star Circle of Care Subdivision, generally located at 1901 Scenic Drive to be known as Lone Star Circle of Care (2022-87-SDP) -- Travis Baird, Assistant Planning Director 1.N 2022-93-SDP - New McDonald's Restaurant Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Site Development Plan Minor Revision, consisting of approximately 1.2939 acres in all of lot 2B, Block A of Wheeler Tract WCOPR, generally located at 2981 FM 1460 to be known as New McDonald's Restaurant (2022-93-SDP) — Haley Webre, Planner 1.0 2023-54-SDP - Haverland BTR Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 40.58 acres in the Flores, A. Survey, generally located at the intersection of Haverland Drive and Weir Road to be known as Haverland BTR (2023-54-SDP) -- Colin Davidson, Planner 1.P 2023-56-SDP - Steger Bizzell 1940 Office Expansion Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 1.128 acres in the Lot 10 of Planned Unit Development of Village Park, generally located at 1940 S. Austin Avenue to be known as 1940 Expansion (2023-56-SDP) -- Maddison O'Kelley, Preservation and Redevelopment Manager 1.Q 2023-58-SDP - SE Inner loop Industrial Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 9.44 acres in the L.J. Dyches Survey, Abstract 180, generally located at 720 SE Inner Loop, Georgetown TX 78627 to be known as SE Inner Loop Industrial (2023-58-SDP) -- Olivia Beams, Historic and Downtown Planner This item was pulled at the request of a Commissioner due to a conflict of interest. No discussion or questions. Moved by Stephen F Dickey; seconded by Mike Tiland to Approve. Motion Approved: 5- 0 Voting For: Travis Perthuis, Chere Heintzmann, Michael L Price, Mike Tiland, Stephen F Dickey Voting Against: None 1.R 2023-63-HT - 608 Tradewinds Way Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning Permit, for the property located at 608 Tradewinds Way, bearing the legal description of 0.123 acres Phase 2, Sec 3, Block C, Lot 21 (2023-63-HT) -- Rachel Hagan, Landscape Planner 1.S 2023-70-HT - 1500 Spring Gulch Lane Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning Permit, for the property located at 1500 Spring Gulch Ln, bearing the legal description of 0.2794 acres, Section 2G, Block C, Lot 39 (2023-70-HT) -- Rachel Hagan, Landscape Planner This item was pulled at the request of a Commissioner. Commissioner Heintzmann asked why this tree is being pruned. Baird established that the applicant is requesting the pruning permit to prevent negative interactions on the tree during construction. Moved by Chere Heintzmann; seconded by Michael L Price to Approve . Motion Approved: 6- 0 Voting For: Travis Perthuis, Christopher B Stanley, Chere Heintzmann, Michael L Price, Mike Tiland, Stephen F Dickey Voting Against: None 1.T 2023-71-HT - 1212 River Trace Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning Permit, for the property located at 1212 River Trace, bearing the legal description of 0.1763 Section 2G, Block C, Lot 27 (2023-71-HT) -- Rachel Hagan, Landscape Planner This item was pulled at the request of a Commissioner. Commissioner Heintzmann asked for clarification on the pictures submitted. Baird established that the yellow arrows indicate the build lines on the lot. Moved by Chere Heintzmann; seconded by Stephen F Dickey to Approve . Motion Approved: 6- 0 Voting For: Travis Perthuis, Christopher B Stanley, Chere Heintzmann, Michael L Price, Mike Tiland, Stephen F Dickey Voting Against: None 1.0 2023-72-HT - 1004 Spring Gulch Lane Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning Permit, for the property located at 1004 Spring Gulch LN, bearing the legal description of 0.1581 acres Section 2G, Block A, Lot 16 (2023-72-HT) -- Rachel Hagan, Landscape Planner This item was pulled at the request of a Commissioner by error. No discussion or questions. Moved by Chere Heintzmann; seconded by Michael L Price to Approve. Motion Approved: 6- 0 Voting For: Travis Perthuis, Christopher B Stanley, Chere Heintzmann, Michael L Price, Mike Tiland, Stephen F Dickey Voting Against: None 1.V 2023-77-HT - 1100 Sean Post Dr Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Removal Permit, for the property located at 4509 Williams Dr., bearing the legal description of Business Personal Property @ 4509 Williams Dr. (2023-79-HT) -- Rachel Hagan, Landscape Planner Travis Baird approached the podium to address the Commission and established that the caption for this item is incorrect. Staff would like to correct the caption of this item to read: "Consideration and possible action to disapprove an application for a Heritage Tree Removal Permit for the property located at 1100 Sean Post Drive". Moved by Chere Heintzmann; seconded by Stephen F Dickey to Approve staff recommendation to disapprove item 1.V. Motion Approved: 6- 0 Voting For: Travis Perthuis, Christopher B Stanley, Chere Heintzmann, Michael L Price, Mike Tiland, Stephen F Dickey Voting Against: None 1.W 2023-75-HT - Parkside on the River / 202 Blue Jasmine TO Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning Permit, for the property located at 202 Blue Jasmine Trl, bearing the legal description of Phase 3, Section 4, 7A & 7B (2023-75-HT) -- Rachel Hagan, Landscape Planner This item was pulled at the request of a Commissioner. Commissioner Heintzmann commented that the pictures look like more than 20% of the tree is requesting to be pruned_ Rachel Hagan, Landscape Planner, approached the podium to address the Commission and established that it is hard to quantify the percentage of the tree requested to be pruned in the pictures submitted, and can look deeper into this pruning application. Moved by Stephen F Dickey; seconded by Chere Heintzmann to Deny item 1.W. Motion Approved: 4- 2 Voting For: Christopher B Stanley, Chere Heintzmann, Mike Tiland, Stephen F Dickey Voting Against: Travis Perthuis, Michael L Price 1.X 2023-79-HT - Amazing Explorers Academy Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Removal Permit, for the property located at 4509 Williams Dr., bearing the legal description of Business Personal Property @ 4509 Williams Dr. (2023-79-HT) -- Rachel Hagan, Landscape Planner 1.Y 2023-80-HT - 1209 Festival St Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning Permit, for the property located at 1209 Festival St, bearing the legal description of Sections 1 & 2, Block E, Lot 1 (2023-80-HT) -- Rachel Hagan, Landscape Planner 1.Z 2023-83-HT - 201 Bluff Creek Ln Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning Permit, for the property located at 201 Bluff Creek Ln, bearing the legal description of 0.33 acres Phase 2, Sec 3, Block D, Lot 8 (2023-83-HT) -- Rachel Hagan, Landscape Planner This item was pulled by a Commissioner. Commissioner Heintzmann asked why trees 1702 and 1703 are being removed. Chair Perthuis noted that those trees do not qualify as Heritage or Protected trees and so no permit is required. Rachel Hagan, Landscape Planner, added that in residential developments, only Heritage Trees are mitigated for. Moved by Chere Heintzmann; seconded by Mike Tiland to Approve. Motion Approved: 6- 0 Voting For: Travis Perthuis, Christopher B Stanley, Chere Heintzmann, Michael L Price, Mike Tiland, Stephen F Dickey Voting Against: None 1.AA 2023-84-HT - 1109 Sean Post Dr. Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning Permit, for the property located at 1109 Sean Post Dr., bearing the legal description of Section 1 & 2, Block B, Lot 27 (2023-84-HT) -- Rachel Hagan, Landscape Planner 1.AB 2023-85-HT - 5600 Sean Paul Ln Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning Permit, for the property located at 5600 Sean Paul Ln, bearing the legal description of Sections 1 &2, Block B, Lot 23 (2023-85-HT) -- Rachel Hagan, Landscape Planner 2. Regular Session 2.0 2023-9-SUP - 1747 Georgetown West Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP) for the specific use of a Wireless Transmission Facility with a 115' tall monopole in the General Commercial (C-3) zoning district on the property located at 934 W University Avenue bearing the legal description of Lot 12, Block A, Wolf Crossing Subdivision, Williamson County, Texas (2023-9-SUP). Travis Baird, Asst. Planning Director Travis Baird presented the staff report. Commissioner Heintzmann asked if there was information provided about the fall zone by the applicant. Baird established that there was not, and a fall zone agreement is not a requirement within the UDC but rather a suggestion. Ben Herrick, Applicant with Foster Real Estate, approached the podium to address the Commission and noted that a fall zone letter was requested after they received the staff report in the past week, and they are confident that it will fall within compliance. Herrick asked the Commission to approve this item with the condition that the fall zone letter is provided. Discussion regarding the adjacent property. Chair Perthuis opened and closed the public hearing with no speakers coming forth. Moved by Stephen F Dickey; seconded by Mike Tiland to Approve the SUP with the condition that the applicant provides a fall zone letter from a certified Texas engineer, that they obtain approved zoning variances as presented by staff, and that 2023-21-AE is approved for fence and landscape buffer conditions. Chair Perthuis commented that this property's proximity to a power substation seems like a huge issue. Baird noted that the Applicant has consulted with the neighboring property owner. Harrick approached the podium to address the Commission and noted that the neighboring property owner was not concerned with the proposed placement of the tower. Commissioner Heintzmann commented that she is extremely concerned with the placement of this tower near a power substation. Motion Failed_ 2-4 Voting For: Mike Tiland, Stephen F Dickey Voting Against: Chere Heintzmann, Travis Perthuis, Christopher B. Stanley, Michael L. Price 2.B 2022-19-SUP - U-Haul Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP) for Self - Storage, Indoor and Commercial Vehicle Sales, Rental or Leasing Facility in the Somerset Hills PUD (Ord. No. 2018-20) zoning district on the property located at 7900 RM 2338, bearing the legal description of 10.528 acres known as Lot 1, Block A, of Furman Tierra Subdivision (2022-19-SUP) -- Travis Baird, Asst. Planning Director Current Planning Travis Baird presented the staff report. Ethan Harwell, Applicant with Kimley-Horn, approached the podium to address the Commission and introduced his team with U-Haul. Harwell spoke to the subject property's features and constraints, noting that the back half of the property is best utilized for drainage and tree preservation. The U-Haul team met with neighboring property owners on September 12th to discuss driveway spacing and made changes to the submitted concept plans before the Commission tonight. Harwell asked the Commission for conditional approval so they can work with staff to have those plans available for City Council. The northern driveway is proposed to be right -in right -out. Harwell spoke to the Future Land Use designation of "Mixed Density Neighborhood" for this property, as well as U-Haul's history and existing locations in town. He commented that this part of Williams Drive has residential uses nearby, and that there will be a retail space within the facility. Chair Perthuis noted that the PUD states that automotive parts and accessory sales are not allowed. Harwell established that is an accessory use, not primary. Chair Perthuis noted that at the time that the PUD was written, commercial vehicle sales was not a use in the code and so not specifically called out. Commissioner Heintzmann asked if they are leasing vehicles at this facility. Harwell noted that the SUP requested is for commercial vehicle sales and leasing, not automotive sales and leasing. Since that use was not listed in the PUD, it opens up the opportunity to request the SUP. The proposed facility will include the leasing of U-Haul vehicles, as well as self storage and retail. Commissioner Heintzmann asked if there are operating hours for the retail portion of the facility. Harwell established that the storage is accessible 24/7, but the retail portion will have specified hours of operation. There will also be several after-hours services provided. Harwell noted that due to the nature of their business operations, they are concerned with the condition suggested by staff to restrict the parking of vehicles in shunting spaces. Chair Perthuis noted that he was on the Commission when the PUD was approved, and the intention of the restricted uses was to not allow this type of business. Discussion on commercial vehicle leasing. Commissioner Dickey asked if the northern side of the property will include screening since it is adjacent to a residential area. Harwell explained that that side of the building will not have any windows or lights to disturb neighboring property owners, and they are likely to only see 10 feet of the building due to the site's topography. Commissioner Heintzmann asked if this site is in the Williams Drive Scenic Corridor. Harwell noted that they are voluntarily complying with the scenic corridor standards. Chair Perthuis opened the public hearing. Doug Meadows, 8201 RR 2338, approached the podium to address the Commission and established that he is concerned with the size and mass of the buildings, and the addition of semi -trucks and rental vehicles on the road. Meadows noted that he is concerned that this will decrease the appeal of possible future residential development on his property. He is also concerned with the proposed driveways and the implications on his property for a future roadway. C.L. Hocker approached the podium to address the Commission. Ralph Himenes, 8169 RR 2338 ceded his time to Hocker. Hocker established that he lives directly across the street from this property and takes pride in his community. He is concerned with the ingress/egress of the development and the implications it may have on his property, noting that driveway placement is approved on a first -come first -serve basis. Hocker agreed that there can be a better use for this property, and is extremely concerned with the addition of semi -trucks trucks on this road, especially since he often has kids visiting his property. He noted that the speed limit on this part of Williams Drive is 60 mph, and he is sometimes concerned he will be injured checking his mailbox. Chair Perthuis closed the public hearing. Moved by Chere Heintzmann; seconded by Michael L Price to Deny the SUP request. Chair Perthuis noted that at the time the PUD was approved, it was intended to prevent this type of use. He also noted that this part of Williams Drive is largely undeveloped, and he will not support self -storage in this area while there is a chance for higher -quality development. Motion Approved: 6- 0 Voting For: Travis Perthuis, Christopher B Stanley, Chere Heintzmann, Michael L Price, Mike Tiland, Stephen F Dickey Voting Against: None 2.A 2023-8-REZ - Rezone church property from Residential (RS) to Public Facility (PF) Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone Sun City Texas Neighborhood 14 Worship Site Tract C from the Residential Single Family (RS) zoning district to the Public Facility (PF) zoning district, for the property generally located at 811 Sun City Blvd. 2023-8-REZ Olivia Beams, Historic and Downtown Planner Olivia Beams presented the staff report. Chair Perthuis asked if this PUD had been developed today if this site's base zoning would be PF. Travis Baird noted that staff likely would've considered a base zoning more fitting than IRS if this PUD were developed today. The reasoning behind the rezone request is due to sign restrictions in the IRS district. Barry Harding, Applicant with The Worship Place, approached the podium to address the Commission and displayed images of the church and its existing signage, noting that they have heard from others that they have trouble locating the church without a larger monument sign. The zoning request is to allow a monument sign on church property fronting Sun City Boulevard. Discussion on dimensions of proposed sign. Chair Perthuis opened the public hearing. Toni Loomis, 111 Breckenridge St., approached the podium to address the Commission and noted that she submitted a letter in opposition of this request. She established that the church has an existing sign on the property, and questioned whether a rezone is necessary to move the sign perpendicular to the road. Loomis established that she has lost trust in The Worship Place and is concerned with what would be allowed if the rezone request is approved. David Gaines, 113 Breckenridge St., approached the podium to address the Commission and established that he is concerned with allowed uses in the requested zoning district, and he believes this problem could be addressed more simply. Dennis R. Moser, 110 Breckenridge St., approached the podium to address the Commission. Ann Moser ceded her time to Dennis. Moser noted that they were not provided much information when he reached out about the rezone request. His house backs up to this property, and he is concerned with what will be allowed by right with the PF zoning district. Chair Perthuis closed the public hearing. Moved by Stephen F Dickey; seconded by Mike Tiland to Approve the request to rezone from RS to PF. Discussion on the possibility of a zoning variance or administrative exception. Baird noted that those requests would not meet the approval criteria since the rezoning path is available. Discussion on impervious cover and allowed uses for the PF district. Commissioner Heintzmann asked if the church would be allowed to build an additional multi- story facility on the property. Beams noted that the maximum building height for PF is 10 feet higher than allowed in IRS, and the site would still need to comply with the impervious coverage restrictions for the PF district. Beams added that is they were to continue to develop under the R3 zoning district, the buffer yard would not be required. Motion Approved: 6- 0 Voting For: Travis Perthuis, Christopher B Stanley, Chere Heintzmann, Michael L Price, Mike Tiland, Stephen F Dickey Voting Against: None 2.D Discussion Items Updates, Commissioner questions, and announcements -- Travis Baird, Assistant Planning Director 3. Executive Session In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, Vernon's Codes, Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the regular session. Adjournment These minutes were approved at the meeting of Chair Attest