HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes P&Z 12.06.2022Minutes of the
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of Georgetown, Texas
Tuesday, December 6, 2022
The Georgetown Planning and Zoning Commission met on Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 6:00 PM at
Council and Court Building, 510 W. 9th Street.
The City of Georgetown is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If
you require assistance in participating at a public meeting due to a disability, as defined under the ADA,
reasonable assistance, adaptations, or accommodations will be provided upon request. Please contact
the City Secretary's Office, at least three (3) days prior to the scheduled meeting date, at (512) 930-3652
or City Hall at 808 Martin Luther King, Jr Street for additional information; TTY users route through Relay
Texas at 711.
The following Members were in attendance:
Present were: Travis Perthuis, Christopher B Stanley, Stephen F Dickey, Timothy E Haynie,
Chere Heintzmann
Agenda Notice
Public Wishing to Address an Advisory Board
On a subject that is posted on this agenda: Please fill out a speaker registra on form which can be found on the
table at the entrance to the mee ng room. Clearly print your name and the le er of the item on which you wish to
speak and present it to the Board Liaison prior to the start of the mee ng. You will be called forward to speak
when the Board considers that item. Only persons who have delivered the speakerform prior to the mee ng being
called to order may speak. Speakers will be allowed up to three minutes to speak. If you wish to speak for six
minutes, it is permissible to use another requestor's granted me to speak. No more than six minutes for a speaker
may be granted. The requestor gran ng me to another speaker must also submit a form and be present at the
meeting.
On a subject not posted on the agenda: A request must be received by the Advisory Board or Commission Liaison
prior to the day the agenda for this mee ng is posted. Each speaker will be given three minutes to address the
Board or Commission members. No action can be taken at this meeting.
Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
Comments from the Chair
Announcements
Action from Executive Session
1. Statutory Consent Agenda
The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non -controversial and routine items that may be acted upon
with one single vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be discussed and
acted upon individually as part of the Regular Session.
Moved by Timothy E Haynie; seconded by Chere Heintzmann to Approve the Consent
Agenda minus Items 1.F and 13.
Motion Approved: 5 - 0
Voting For: Travis Perthuis, Christopher B Stanley, Timothy E Haynie, Chere
Heintzmann, Stephen F Dickey
Voting Against: None
1.A Meeting Minutes
Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes from the November 15th,
2022 regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission -- Jessica Lemanski,
Planning Specialist
1.13 2022-14-TIA - Bridge Logistics TIA
Consideration and possible action to approve application for a Traffic Impact Analysis,
consisting of approximately 92.248 acres in the F. A. Hudson Survey, Abstract 295, and
the J. Powell Survey, Abstract 491, generally located at Rabbit Hill Rd to be known as
Bridge Logistics TIA (2022-14-TIA) — David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility
Engineering
1.0 2022-15-TIA - GTown 971
Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item
application for a Traffic Impact Analysis, consisting of approximately 2000 FM 971,
generally located at 2000 FM 971 to be known as GTown 971 (2022-15-TIA) — David
Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering.
1.D 2022-15-PP - Northside Georgetown Subdivision
Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of approximately 72.01 acres in the John
Berry Survey, Abstract No. 51, generally located at 350 SH 195 to be known as Northside
Georgetown Subdivision (2022-15-PP) — Patrick Collins, Senior Planner
1.E 2022-16-PP - Keystone Georgetown Preliminary Plat
Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of approximately 51.055 acres in the William
Addison Survey, Abstract No. 21 and the Lewis J. Dyches Survey, Abstract No. 2 ,
generally located at 1951 FM 1460 to be known as Keystone Georgetown Preliminary Plat
(2022-16-PP) — Ryan Clark, AICP Candidate, Planner II
1.F 2022-17-PP - North Vista Ranch, Phase II
Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of approximately 65.33 acres in the
Northcross, J. Survey, generally located at 2696 CR 255 to be known as North Vista
Ranch, Phase II (2022-17-PP) — Patrick Collins, Senior Planner
Travis Baird approached the podium to address the Commission and established that
staff requested Item 11 be pulled from the Consent Agenda. The review letter from
Williamson County is not attached to the agenda, and staff is submitting the comments to
the Commission for transparency. Staff is still requesting disapproval of the item.
Moved by Stephen F Dickey; seconded by Chere Heintzmann to Deny Item 1.F as
requested by staff.
Motion Approved: 5- 0
Voting For: Travis Perthuis, Christopher B Stanley, Timothy E Haynie, Chere
Heintzmann, Stephen F Dickey
Voting Against: None
1.G 2022-19-PP - Daniell's Trace
Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Preliminary Plat,
consisting of approximately 107.91 AC acres in the C. H. Delaney Survey, Abstract No.
181, generally located at 2701 CR 245 to be known as Daniell's Trace (2022-19-PP) —
Patrick Collins, Senior Planner
1.H 2O22-22-PP - Woodside West
Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Preliminary Plat,
consisting of approximately 207.14 acres in the Burrell Eaves Survey Abstract No. 216 &
Lemuel S. Walters Survey Abstract No. 653, generally located at Ronald Reagan Blvd and
SH 195 to be known as Woodside West (2022-22-PP) -- Grant White, Planner
1.I 2022-23-PP - Woodside East
Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Site Development Plan,
consisting of approximately 279.19 acres in the Burrell Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 216
and L. Walters Survey, Abstract No. 653, generally located at SH 195 and Ronald
Reagan Boulevard to be known as Woodside East (2022-23-PP) — Ryan Clark, AICP
Candidate, Planner II
1.3 2021-35-CON - Patterson Ranch Phase 3
Consideration and possible action to approve application for Construction Plans,
consisting of approximately 36.787 acres in the William Addison, Wm. Survey, Abstract
No. 21, generally located at NE corner of Rockride and CR 110 to be known as Patterson
Ranch Phase 3 (2021-35-CON) — David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
1X 2022-13-CON - Lost Quarry Phase II
Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item
application for Construction Plans, consisting of approximately 13.476 acres in the
Thompson, J. Survey AW0608 AW0608, generally located at Lost Quarry Rd and FM
2234 to be known as Lost Quarry Phase 11 (2022-13-CON) — David Munk, PE, and Lua
Saluone, Utility Engineering
1.L 2022-38-CON - Sun City Neighborhood 65
Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item
application for Construction Plans, consisting of approximately 53.86 Acres In THE
Frederick Foy Survey, Abstract No.229 AND Lewis P. Dyches Survey, Abstract
No.171, generally located at 1007 Rocky Hollow Creek Dr. to be known as Sun City
Neighborhood 65 (2022-38-CON) — David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility
Engineering.
1.M 2021-3-PFP - Springbrook Partners LP at Longhorn Junction
Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Preliminary Final Plat
Combo, consisting of approximately 24.500 acres in the L. J. Dyches Survey, Abstract No.
180, generally located at 205 Blue Ridge Drive to be known as Springbrook Partners LP
at Longhorn Junction (2021-3-PFP) — Patrick Collins, Senior Planner
1.N 2021-16-PFP - Westinghouse Commercial Subdivision
Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Preliminary Final Plat
Combo, consisting of approximately 7.74 acres in the Barney C. Low Survey, Abstract
No. 385, generally located at 3010 FM 1460 to be known as Westinghouse Commercial
Subdivision (2021-16-PFP) — Patrick Collins, Senior Planner
1.0 2022-1-PFP - Summit at Westinghouse Zone 2A
Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Preliminary Final Plat Combo, consisting of approximately 19.02 acres in
the 19.02 acres in the Barney C. Low Survey, Abstract No. 385, generally located at 5401
N. Mays St. to be known as Summit at Westinghouse Zone 2A (2022-1-PFP) -- Grant
White, Planner
1.P 2022-20-PFP - Re -Plat Establishing Orenda Subdivision
Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Preliminary Final Plat
Combo, consisting of approximately 52.058 acres in the J. Mott Survey Abstract No. 427
and C. Bell Survey Abstract No. 112, generally located at Westinghouse Road to be
known as Replat of Orenda Subdivision (2022-20-PFP) -- Ryan Clark, AICP Candidate,
Planner II
1.Q 2022-19-FP - Hart's Corner Subdivision
Consideration and possible action to approve for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 0.1139 acres out of the C.
Stubblefield Survey Abstract No. 558, generally located at 1507 Hart Street to be known
as Hart's Corner Subdivision (2022-19-FP) — Travis Baird, Assistant Planning Director
1. R 2022-30-FP - Texas Outdoor Power Replat
Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Replat, consisting of
approximately 11.959 acres in Lott, Block 1, Texas Outdoor Power Subdivision,
generally located at 111 Halmar Cv to be known as Texas Outdoor Power Replat (2022-
30-FP) — Patrick Collins, Senior Planner
1.S 2022-32-FP - Replat of Lot 28 and Part of Lot 29, Block 4, Country Club
Acres Unit 5
Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Final Plat, consisting of
approximately 0.312 acres in Lot 28 and Part of Lot 29, Block 4, Country Club Acres Unit
5, generally located at 1104 Parker Cir to be known as Replat of Lot 28 and Part of Lot
29, Block 4, Country Club Acres Unit 5 (2022-32-FP) — Patrick Collins, Senior Planner
1.T 2022-34-FP - Parkside Peninsula Section 1 & 2
Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 62.048 acres in the John T.
Church Survey, Abstract No. 140 and Key West Irrigation Co. Survey, Abstract No. 711.
generally located at RM 2243 & CR 176 to be known as Parkside Peninsula Section 1 & 2
(2022-34-FP) - Grant White, Planner
Travis Baird approached the podium to address the Commission and established that
staff requested this item be pulled from the Consent Agenda due to resolved comments
related to a lift station on a lot notated on the plat. Staff is requesting the item be
approved.
Moved by Timothy E Haynie; seconded by Christopher B Stanley to Approve Item 1.T.
Motion Approved: 5- 0
Voting For: Travis Perthuis, Christopher B Stanley, Timothy E Haynie, Chere
Heintzmann, Stephen F Dickey
Voting Against: None
1.0 2022-35-FP - Amending Plat of SPC Cemetery, Block 12, and a Portion of Block
13
Consideration and possible action to approve an application for an Amending Plat,
consisting of approximately 2.873 acres in the SPC Cemetery, Block 12, and a Portion of
Block 13, generally located at 106 E 20TH ST to be known as Amending Plat of SPC
Cemetery, Block 12, and a Portion of Block 13 (2022-35-FP) -- Patrick Collins, Senior
Planner
1.V 2022-48-FP - Lakeway Industrial 10AC Replat
Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Replat, consisting of approximately 10.593 acres known as Lot 1, Block B
of the Havins Airport Commercial Subdivision, generally located at Lakeway Drive to be
known as Replat of Lot 1, Block B Havins Airport Commercial Subdivision (2022-48-FP) --
Ryan Clark, AICP Candidate, Planner II
1.W 2022-59-FP - Riverstone Phase A Final Plat
Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 35.43 acres in the I. Donagan
Survey Abstract No. 178, generally located at 3313 W SH 29 to be known as Riverstone
Phase A (2022-59-FP) -- Grant White, Planner
1.X 2022-70-FP - Replat for Georgetown Storage
Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Replat, consisting of approximately 3.98 acres in the Isaac Donagan
Survey, Abstract No.178, generally located at 2701 and 2801 West University Avenue to
be known as Replat of Lot 1A of The Replat of Lot 1 of Shadow Canyon Commercial
Section 2 and all of Shadow Canyon Commercial Section 1 (2022-70-FP) — Ryan Clark,
Planner II
1.Y 2021-33-SWP - Shell West Reserve Lot 1B
Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item
application for a Stormwater Permit, consisting of Shell West reserve Lot 1 B, generally
located at 3305 Shell Rd to be known as Shell West Reserve Lot 1 B (2021-33-SWP) —
David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering.
1.Z 2022-23-SWP - Summit at Westinghouse
Consideration and possible action to approve application for a Stormwater Permit,
consisting of A 19.02-acre tract of land located in the B.C. Low Survey, Abstract No. 385,
generally located at 5201 N Mays St to be known as Summit at Westinghouse (2022-23-
SWP) — David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering.
1.AA 2022-24-SWP - Titan North Park VIII, LLC Stormwater Permit
Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item
application for a Stormwater Permit, consisting of 17.516 Acres in the Wright, D. Survey,
AW0013, generally located at 1805 Titan Dr. to be known as Titan NorthPark VIII, LLC
Stormwater Permit (2022-24-SWP) — David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility
Engineering.
1.AB 2021-14-SDP - HEB Georgetown 01
Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Site Development
Plan, consisting of approximately 15.294 acres in the Joseph P. Puslifer Survey,
generally located at 1010 W. University to be known as HEB Georgetown 01 (AKA Wolf
Lakes Village Section 3) (2021-14-SDP) -- Travis Baird, Assistant Planning Director
1.AC 2022-12-SDP - Lawhon Site
Consideration and possible action to approve with the conditions set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 25.52 acres in the
AW0556 - STUBBLEFIELD, W. Survey, generally located at 1500 LAWHON LN to be
known as Lawhon Site (2022-12-SDP) — Ryan Clark, AICP Candidate, Planner 11
1.AD 2022-24-SDP - Freehill Site Development Plan
Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Site Development
Plan, consisting of approximately 14.465 acres in the Lot 2 Block A of the "DG
Westinghouse Addition", generally located at 1300 Westinghouse Road to be known as
Freehill Site Development Plan (2022-24-SDP) — Patrick Collins, Senior Planner
1.AE 2022-29-SDP - Rivery Office Condo
Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 3.27 acres in Lot 5C,
Block B, of Rivery Phase 1, generally located at 723 S IH 35 to be known as Rivery Office
Condo (2022-29-SDP) — Ryan Clark, Planner II
1.AF 2022-51-SDP - First Baptist Church Site Plan
Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 34.0058 acres in the
J. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 608, generally located at 1333 West University Avenue
to be known as First Baptist Church Georgetown (2022-51-SDP) — Ryan Clark, Planner II
1.AG 2022-54-SDP - Ascalon Medical Office Park
Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 4.48 acres known as
Lot 2-B of Chapriel Place, generally located at 4829 Williams Drive to be known as
Ascalon Medical Office Park (2022-54-SDP) -- Grant White, Planner
1.AH 2O22-58-SDP - Titan NorthPark35 VIII, LLC
Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Site Development Plan,
consisting of approximately 17.516 acres in the David Wright Survey, Abstract No. 13,
generally located at Titan Drive to be known as Titan NorthP2rk35 VIII (2022-58-SDP) —
Ryan Clark, Planner II
1.AI 2022-82-SDP - Wolf Ranch Elementary Portable Classroom Addition
Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Site Development
Plan, consisting of approximately 17.69 acres known as Lot 1, Block A Wolf Ranch
Elementary Subdivision, generally located at 1201 Jay Wolf Drive to be known as Wolf
Ranch Elementary Portable Classroom Addition (2022-82-SDP) — Ryan Clark, AICP
Candidate, Planner 11
1.AJ 2022-3-DWP - Cole Estates TxDOT Driveway Improvements
Consideration and possible action to approve application for Driveway Access Permit,
consisting of approximately Cole Estates Subdivision, generally located at 4901 W SH 29
to be known as Cole Estates TxDOT Driveway Improvements (2022-3-DWP) — David
Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering.
1.AK 2022-76-HT - 1109 Mulberry Oak Ln.
Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning
Permit, for the property located at 1109 Mulberry Oak Lane, bearing the legal
description of Parkside on the River, Phase 2, Section 1, Lot 8, Block V (2022-76-HT).
Rachel Hagan, Landscape Planner
1.AL 2022-77-HT - Hidden Oak 22580-HT
Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Removal
Permit and Pruning Permit, for the property located at Common area, Hidden Oak, and
Sandy Hill Lane, bearing the legal description of 3.29 acres Block B, Lot 1A, Hidden Oak
& Two (Block B Lots 1 & 12-17 & 5-9 AMD) (2022-77-HT) Rachel Hagan, Landscape
Planner
1.AM 2022-97-HT - 110 Wolf Ridge
Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree
Pruning Permit, for the property located at 110 Wolf Ridge, bearing the legal
description of Phase 2 Section 3 Wolf Ranch West (2022-97-HT) Rachel Hagan,
Landscape Planner
1.AN 2022-99-HT - 1316 Plum Tree Way
Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning
Permit, for the property located at 1316 Plum Tree Way, bearing the legal description of
0.15 Acres, Parkside on the River, Phase 2, Section 2, Lot 2, Block T (2022-99-HT)
Rachel Hagan, Landscape Planner
1.AO 2022-100-HT - 117 Wolf Ridge
Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree
Pruning Permit, for the property located at 117 Wolf Ridge Rd., bearing the legal
description of Wolf Ranch Section 1A, Phase 3, Lot 25, Block S (2022-100-HT)
Rachel Hagan, Landscape Planner
2. Regular Session
2.A 2022-1-PUD - Northpark 35 Commercial
Consideration and possible action on a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to
rezone approximately 42.172 acres out of the David Wright Survey, Abstract No. 13
from the Agriculture (AG) zoning district to a Planned Unit Development District (PUD)
zoning district, for the property generally located at 3001 IH-35 (2022-1-PUD) - Travis
Baird-Asst. Planning Director
Travis Baird presented the staff report. The Applicant is here and wishes to address the
Commission.
Commissioner Heintzmann asked if the industrial distribution center backs up to Berry
Springs. Baird confirmed that it does back up to a portion of the preserve, but it is worth
noting that that portion is severed by the creek from the rest of the preserve.
Commissioner Heintzmann asked if there are buffer requirements for that portion. Baird
explained that the industrial uses will not back up to the preserve, but instead allowed to
the south of Sanaloma Drive. These uses are considered buffered from the preserve by
the multifamily portion of the property.
Commissioner Dickey asked if the Commission had seen many PUDs without a specific
site plan. Baird established that the specificity of site plans can vary with PUDs, and
many focus on uses as opposed to exact dimensionalities of lots and buildings. Given
the disclaimer language within the PUD document, we are unable to be certain of where
they'll place their buildings and trail.
Sal Perdomo, Titan Development (Applicant), approached the podium to address the
Commission and established that they saw the Commission 3-4 months ago for this
property, and they wanted to develop the commercial areas for big box retailers, but
received poor feedback from those retailers due to the location of the property. They are
proposing to buffer the site from Berry Springs Preserve with the multifamily area, and
include a trail to connect Sanaloma and Titan Drive along the rear of the site. The
multifamily use is intended to feel like an urban area, which is why it is pushed towards the
road and parking is moved towards the rear of the site. Deviations from the base zoning is
only done when absolutely necessary, and enhanced entry and articulation standards are
included in the PUD to better reflect the base zoning_ Industrial areas on the site will not
be huge due to the limited depth of Zone B, and uses will be targeted more towards office
and other manufacturing uses.
Commissioner Dickey commented that allowing warehousing in the PUD may not be a
good idea, as City Council recently voted to deny a PUD where warehousing was an
allowed use. Perdomo explained that due to the depth of the site, they anticipate it being
a more flexible office space than traditional warehousing, and they are unsure how to
develop the site without allowing warehousing due to fiscal constraints.
Chair Perthuis asked why they did not bring a solidified site plan. Perdomo established
that because they are unsure of the specific tenants, they are unable to nail down a
specific site plan. Self storage units will be located within Sienna Peak. Discussion on
potential tenants.
Commissioner Stanley commented that the PUD is difficult to analyze because of the
disclaimer language within it and asked why they wrote it that way instead of being
more specific and requesting an amendment if they need it. Perdomo explained
that they are trying to design the PUD with market analysis in mind, and an
amendment to the PUD could be difficult to achieve.
Chair Perthuis opened and closed the public hearing with no speakers coming forth.
Moved by Travis Perthuis; seconded by Christopher B Stanley to Deny Item 2.A due to
insufficient information in the application.
Commissioner Dickey commented that the MF-2 zoning and the front of the project
looks good, but there is too much industrial at the back of the project.
Perdomo approached the podium to address the Commission and requested to hear
the Commission's concerns and address them now. Commissioner Dickey asked for a
concept plan for the bigger industrial uses in the back of the property. Commissioner
Stanley commented that we would be losing the regional center designation, and there
is a lot of surrounding industrial uses, but the line must be drawn somewhere. Perdomo
asked how they can proceed to address Commissioner concerns in a more specific site
plan. Discussion on process.
Motion Withdrawn: 0- 0
Voting For: None
Voting Against: None
The Applicant requested to postpone Item 2.A to a later date pending resubmittal.
No action was taken by the Commission on this item.
2.13 Staff Report
Updates, Commissioner questions, and comments. -- Travis Baird, Assistant Planning
Director
Travis Baird approached the podium to address the Gommission.
Baird notified the Commission that City Council denied the Brennan PUD.
Baird requested changes to the posting of the agenda due to extreme file sizes, leading
to technical issues with the software.
Baird requested the Commission be on the lookout for a survey to get feedback on
cover sheets and their format.
3. Executive Session
In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, Vernon's Codes,
Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the
regular session.
Adjournment
These minutes were approved at the meeting of Ue<OK 20ZZ
Chair Attest