HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes P&Z 03.15.2022City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes
Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 6:00 p.m.
Courts and Council Building, located at 510 W. 9th Street, Georgetown, TX 78626
Commissioners Present: Steve Dickey, Tim Haynie, Chere Heintzmann; Doug Noble; Travis Perthuis;
Chris Stanley and Mike Tiland
Commissioners Absent: Scott Allen; Colin McGahey; Mike Price; and Jim Salyer
Staff Present: Sofia Nelson, Planning Director; Travis Baird, Assistant Director; Grant White, Associate
Planner; Cesar Acosta, Long Range Planner; Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering; David Munk, Utility
Engineer; Wesley Wright, PE, Systems Engineering Director; and Karen Frost, Assistant City Secretary
Chair Perthuis called the meeting to order at 6:06 pm with the reciting of the pledge of allegiance.
Public Wishing to Address the Board
At the time of posting, no persons had signed up to address the Board on items not posted.
Consent Agenda
The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non -controversial and routine items that may be acted upon
with one single vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be discussed and.
acted upon individually as part of the Regular Agenda.
A Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes from the March 1, 2022 regular meeting
of the Planning and Zoning Commission -- Karen Frost, Assistant City Secretary
B Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application
for a Traffic Impact Analysis, consisting of approximately 77.830 acres in the Woodruff
Stubblefield Sur. Abstract No. 556, generally located at Bell Gin and Sam Houston to be known as
Lawlion Tract (2021-8-TIA) — David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
C Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 19.331 acres in the David
Wright Survey, Abstract 13, generally located at 1805 Aviation Drive to be known as Titan
NorthPark35 V (2021-60-SDP) - Ryan Clark, Planner
D Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application
for a Traffic Impact Analysis, consisting of approximately 40.086 acres in the Joseph Fish Survey,
Abstract No. 232, generally located at SE corner of SE Inner Loop and Blue Springs Blvd to be
known as Longhorn Junction Logistics Center (2021-9-TIA) - David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone,
Utility Engineering
E Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application
for a Traffic Impact Analysis, consisting of approximately 12.667 acres in the McCoy School Sub,
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 14
March 15, 2022
Lot 1, generally located at 1313 Williams Dr to be known as Rivery Boulevard Mixed Use (2022-2-
TIA) — David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
F Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of
approximately 364.2 acres out of the D. Casanova Survey Abstract No. 128, the W.A. Turner
Survey, Abstract No. 607 and the Baker Survey, Abstract No. 824, generally located at the
northeast corner of FM 3405 and South CR 289, to be known as The Canyons at HCH Ranch
(2020-14-PP) — Ethan Harwell, Senior Planner
G Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of approximately 34.15 acres in the Thompson, J.
Sur., Abstract No. 608 generally located at FM 2243 to be known as Wolf Ranch West, Section 4G
(2021-33-PP) — Grant White, Associate Planner
H Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of approximately 11.999 acres in the William
Addison Survey, Abstract No. 21, generally located at 2763 Rockride Ln to be known as Maven
Subdivision (2022-2-PP) -- Travis Baird, Assistant Planning Director
I Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of approximately 53.68 acres in the Joseph
Thompson Survey, Abstract 608, Abstract 608 generally located at South of Jay Wolf Drive and
Blue Blaze Trail to be known as Wolf Ranch West, Section 3G (2022-3-PP) — Ryan Clark, Planner
J Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of approximately 148.74 acres in the A.H. Porter
Survey, Abstract No. 490, generally located at 300 Lighting Ranch Rd to be known as The Ranch
at Cimarron Hills (2022-5-PP) -- Ethan Harwell, Senior Planner
K Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of approximately 68.877 acres in the Isaac Donagan
survey, Abstract No. 178, generally located at Wolf Ranch --South of SH 29 West SW Bypass to be
known as Wolf Ranch Phase 8 (2022-6-PP) — Ryan Clark, Planner
L Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of approximately 77.7763 acres in the Isaac Donagan
Survey, Abstract 178 and the Joseph Thompson Survey, Abstract 608, generally located at South
side of SH 29 West of Southwest Bypass to be known as Wolf Ranch Phase 7 (2022-7-PP) — Ryan
Clark, Planner
M Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application
for Construction Plans, consisting of approximately 59.0 acres in the Chas H. Delaney Survey,
Abstract No.181, generally located at 10128 RM 2338 to be known as Parmer Ranch Phases 5A, 6
and 7 (2021-44-CON) — David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
N Consideration and possible action to approve application for Construction Plans, consisting of
approximately 2.95 acres in the Donagan, I. Survey, Abstract 178, generally located at Wolf
Canyon Rd to be known as Wolf Ranch West Section 8 Phase 1 (2021-45-CON) — David Munk, PE,
and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 14
March 15, 2022
O Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application
for Construction Plans, consisting of approximately 47.83 acres in the Lewis P. Dyches Sur. Abs
No 171, generally located at 7811 Ranch Road 2338 to be known as Broken Oak Subdivision (2021-
48-CON) - David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
P Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application
for Construction Plans, consisting of approximately 1.427 acres in the JP Pulsifer Survey, Abstract
No. 498, generally located at Wolf Lakes Dr and Sunset Vista to be known as Wolf Lakes Village
Section 8 (2022-1-CON) - David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
Q Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application
for Construction Plans, consisting of approximately 0.43 acres in the River Hills Sec 1, Block A,
Lots 1, 2, 3, and 13, generally located at 1010 S IH 35 to be known as Wolf Lakes Village 24"
Waterline Extension (2022-2-CON) - David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
R Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application
for Construction Plans, consisting of approximately 54.47 acres in the I Donagan Survey, Abs No.
178, generally located at 3313 W SH 29 to be known as Riverstone Phases A & B (2022-3-CON) -
David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
S Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application
for Construction Plans, consisting of approximately 49.08 acres in the B. Eaves Survey, Abstract
No. 216, generally located at 2451 SH 195 to be known as Berry Creek Highlands Phase 4C (2022-
4-CON) - David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
T Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application
for Construction Plans, consisting of approximately 34.41 acres in the Thompson J. Survey,
Abstract No. 608, generally located at Blue Blaze Trl and Wandering Path to be known as Wolf
Ranch West Section 4G (2022-5-CON) - David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
U Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Preliminary Final Plat Combo,
consisting of approximately 7.516 acres in the Lewis J. Dyches Survey, Abstract No. 180, generally
located at 4601 South IH 35 to be known as Georgetown Travel Center (2020-23-PFP) - Ryan
Clark, Planner
V Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Preliminary Final Plat Combo, consisting of approximately 35 acres in the deed
to Georgetown ISD Recorded in Doc. No. #2021085204-1 O.P.R.W.C.T., generally located at 5001.
Airport Rd to be known as G.I.S.D Future Ready Learning Complex (2022-3-PFP) -- Ethan
Harwell, Senior Planner
W Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Preliminary Final Plat Combo, consisting of approximately 5.728 acres in the
Joseph Robertson Survey, Abstract No. 545, and the F.A. Hudson Survey, Abstract No. 295,
generally located at NE of FM 1460 and Westinghouse Road to be known as Wheeler Tract Lot 9
& Lot 10 (2022-4-PFP) - Ryan Clark, Planner
X Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Preliminary Final Plat Combo, consisting of approximately 1.427 acres in the
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 14
March 15, 2022
Joseph P. Pulsifer Survey, Abstract No. 498, generally located at Wolf Road to be known as Wolf
Lakes Village, Section 8 (2022-5-PFP) -- Ethan Harwell, Senior Planner
Y Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Preliminary Final Plat Combo, consisting of approximately 6.507 acres in the
Joseph P. Pulsifer Survey, Abstract No. 498, generally located at Southeast corner of Bella June
Dr/Sunset Vista Dr to be known as Wolf Lakes Village, Section 7 (2022-6-PFP) -- Ethan Harwell,
Senior Planner
Z Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Final Plat, consisting of
approximately 31.638 acres in the I. Donagan Survey, Abstract No. 178, generally located at SH 29
and Parkside Parkway to be known as Water Oak North, Section 6 (2021-12-FP) — Travis Baird,
Assistant Planning Director
AA Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of
approximately 57.47 acres in the Isaac Donagan Survey, Abstract No. 178, generally located at
3313 and 3321 SH 29 W to be known as Scott Felder Homes - Riverstone (2021-15-PP) — Travis
Baird, Assistant Planning Director
AB Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Replat, consisting of approximately 5 acres in the Fredrick Foy Survey, Abstract
No. 229, generally located at 1101 Wildwood Xing to be known as Lot 4, Block Two, Whisper
Wood I (2021-51-FP) — Ryan Clark, Planner
AC Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Final Plat, consisting of
approximately 34.81 acres in the Frederick Foy Survey Abstract No. 229, generally located at 300
Tall Riders Drive to be known as Final Plat Sun City Neighborhood 77 (2021-57-FP) — Ryan Clark,
Planner
AD Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 56.615 acre tract in the Orville Perry
Survey, Abstract No. 10, generally located at Magnolia Springs Drive to be known as Wolf Ranch
West Section 3, Phase 2 (2021-58-FP) — Grant White, Associate Planner
AE Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Final Plat, consisting of
approximately 9.73 acres in the Frederick Foy Survey, Abstract No. 229, generally located at 31600
Ronald Reagan Blvd to be known as Sun City Neighborhood Eighty (2021-75-FP) — Ryan Clark,
Planner
AF Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 61.715 acres in the William Roberts
Survey, Abstract No. 524, generally located at 4805 N IH 35 to be known as Jackson Shaw
Georgetown Phase 1 (2021-76-FP) -- Ethan Harwell, Senior Planner
AG Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 27.404 acres in the David Wright Survey,
Abstract No. 13 and the John Berry Survey, Abstract No. 51, generally located at 500 SH 130 Toll
to be known as Gateway 35, Phase 3 (2021-88-FP) --Travis Baird, Assistant Planning Director
Ali Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 58.008 acres in the William Addison
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 14
March 15, 2022
Survey, Abstract No. 21 and the South Rockride Subdivision, generally located at 4301
Southwestern Blvd. to be known as Final Plat of Patterson Ranch Phase 1 (2021-89-FP) --Travis
Baird, Assistant Planning Director
Al Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 2.942 acres in the Isaac Donagan Survey,
Abstract No. 178, generally located at Wolf Canyon Rd to be known as Wolf Ranch West, Section
8, Phase 1 (2021-98-FP) — Ryan Clark, Planner
AJ Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 24.744 acres in the William Roberts
Survey, Abstract No. 524, generally located at 2101 Shell Rd to be known as Hope Ranch (2022-4-
FP) -- Travis Baird, Assistant Planning Director
AK Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 2.467 acres in the Burrell Eaves Survey.
Abstract No. 216, generally located at 2451 State Highway 195 to be known as Berry Creek
Highlands Phase 4C (2022-5-FP) — Ryan Clark, Planner
AL Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application
for a Stormwater Permit, consisting of 4.72 acres in the Isaac Donagan Sur. Abs No. 178, generally
located at 4850 SH 29 to be known as Highway 29 C-Store (2021-1-SWP) —David Munk, PE, and
Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
AM Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application
for a Stormwater Permit, consisting of 24.428 acres of a 414.674 acre tract in the CC Aggregates,
LLC Doc No. 2017092999, generally located at near 351 CR 147 to be known as Hwy 195
Commercial (2021-12-SWP) — David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
AN Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasonsset forth in the item application
for a Stormwater Permit, consisting of 5.01 acres in Lot 2, Shell West Reserve, generally located at
3309 Shell Rd to be known as McCasland Christian Academy (2022-5-SWP) — David Munk, PE,
and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
AO Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application
for a Stormwater Permit, consisting of 9.47 acres in the East View Ranchettes Sec One, generally
located at 4301 E University Ave to be known as Nueces Power (2022-6-SWP) — David Munk, PE,
and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
AP Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a minor revision to a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 5.19
acres in the Hewlett Subdivision Section 2, generally located at 7951 Hewlett Loop to be known as
Don Hewlett Volkswagen (2019-21-SDP) — Travis Baird, Assistant Planning Director
AQ Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Site Development Plan,
consisting of 2.46 acres in Lot 1 of Pinnacle Plaza Subdivision, generally located at 2621 W.
University Avenue to be known as Pinnacle Montessori Academy - Georgetown (2020-5-SDP) —
Ryan Clark, Planner
AR Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Site Development Plan,
consisting of approximately 15.294-acres in the Joseph P. Pulsifer Survey Abstract No. 498 and the
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 14
March 15, 2022
Clement Stubblefield Survey, Abstract No. 558, generally located at 1010 W. University to be
known as HEB Georgetown 01 (AKA Wolf Lakes Village Section 3) (2021-14-SDP) -- Ethan
Harwell, Senior Planner
AS Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Site Development Plan
Amendment, consisting of approximately 19.641 acres in the D. Wright Survey, Abstract No. 13,
generally located at 2550 North I.H. to be known as Titan Gateway35 - Building 1 (2021-21-SDP) -
Ryan Clark, Planner
AT Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Site Development Plan,
consisting of approximately 20.47 acres out of the Williams Addison Survey, Abstract No. 21,
generally located at 2050 Rockride Lane to be known as R.O.C.K (2021-40-SDP) - Travis Baird,
Assistant Planning Director
AUConsideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of 18.85 acres in Lot 14 of the Replat of
Planned Unit Development of Sun City Georgetown Neighborhood 10-E generally located at 110
Smokestack Lane to be known as Sun City RV Tract Amenity Center (2021-59-SDP) - Ryan Clark,
Planner
AV Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Site Development Plan,
consisting of approximately 6.079 acres in the C. Stubblefield Survey, Abstract No 558, generally
located at 934 West University to be known as Hotel Development (2021-66-SDP) - Ryan Clark,
Planner
AW Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 50.19 acres in the David
Wright Survey, Abstract No. 13, generally located at 1800 Aviation Dr. to be known as
Georgetown Logistics (2021-70-SDP) - Ryan Clark, Planner
AX Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 4.73 acres in the B. Eaves
Survey, Abstract No. 216, generally located at 1501 Bch Way to be known as Berry Creek Amenity
Center (2021-71-SDP) -Ryan Clark, Planner
AY Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 2.103 and 1.88 acres in the
Shadow Canyon Commercial, Section 2, Lot 1A and Shadow Canyon Commercial, Section 1 Block
1, Lot 1, generally located at 2701 & 2801 W University Ave. to be known as Georgetown Storage
(2021-75-SDP) - Ryan Clark, Planner
AZ Consideration and possible action to approve with the conditions set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 23.62 acres in the A Flores
Survey, Abstract No. 235 and W. Addison Survey, Abstract No. 21, generally located at 110 W. L.
Walden to be known as Georgetown Animal Shelter Kennel Addition (2021-76-SDP) - Ryan
Clark, Planner
BA Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 54.5 acres in the L.J. Dyches
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 14
March 15, 2022
Survey, Abstract No. 180, generally located at Conner of IH 35 and SE Inner Loop to be known as
Longhorn Junction Logistics Center (2021-77-SDP) — Ryan Clark, Planner
BB Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 61.72 acres in the Williams
Roberts Survey, Abstract No. 524, generally located at 4811 N IH-35 to be known as Jackson Shaw
- Phase 1 (2021-79-SDP) -- Ethan Harwell, Senior Planner
BC Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Site Development Plan,
consisting of approximately 1.62 acres in the Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, Block C, Lot 1, Acres
0.334, Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud, Block E, Lot 53, Acres 0.373Georgetown Village Sec 7 Pud,
Block G, Lot 25, Acres 0.0765Georgetown Village SEC 8 PUD, Block G, Lot 25, Acres
0.6928Georgetown Village Sec 3-b, Block B, Lot 47, Acres 0.885Shell Ranch Sec 3, Block A, Lot 44,
Acres 0.921, Shell Ranch Sec 2-a, Block A, Lot 1, Acres 0.718Shell Ranch Sec 2-c Block A, Lot 1,
Acres 0.3465Georgetown Village Sec 9 Ph 1 PUD, Block A, Lot 40, Acres 0.3482Georgetown
Village Sec 9 Ph 1 PUD, Block 1, Lot 18, Acres 0.053Georgetown Village Sec 9 Ph 1 PUD, Block L,
Lot 40, Acres 0.053Georgetown Village Sec 9 Ph 1 PUD, Block M, Lot 6, Acres 1.5453 Georgetown
Village Sec 6 PUD, Block B, Lot 12, Acres 0.291Georgetown Village Sec 6 PUD, Block C, Lot 29,
Acres 3.722, generally located at Shell Road and Village Commons Blvd/Westbury Ln to be
known as Georgetown Village PID - Shell Road Improvements (2021-82-SDP) Ryan Clark,
Planner
BD Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 18.4098 acres in the Francis
A. Hudson, Abstract No. 295, generally located at 1201 Westinghouse Road to be known as
Windmill Hill Industrial (2021-84-SDP) — Travis Baird, Assistant Planning Director
BE Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 0.42 acres in Lot 2, Block 1,
Jim Hogg Addition, generally located at 5606 Williams Drive to be known as Take 5 Georgetown
(2022-1-SDP) — Ryan Clark, Planner
BF Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 12.043 acres being Lot 2,
Block A, Wolf Lakes Village, Section 2, generally located at FM 265 and Wolf Ranch Parkway to
be known as Seton Wolf Lakes (2022-2-SDP) — Ryan Clark, Planner
BG Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 2.167 acres in the Block A
West Georgetown Village 1, Block A, Lot 6, generally located at 4509 Williams Dr to be known as
Amazing Explorer's Academy Georgetown (2022-8-SDP) -- Grant White, Associate Planner
BH Consideration and possible action to disapprove an application for a Site Development Plan,
consisting of approximately 13.33 acres in the Lot 22, Block G Carlson Place Phase H, and Lot 22,
Block G Carlson Place Phase C, generally located at 1240 Cliffbrake Way to be known as Carlson
Place Park (2022-9-SDP) — Ryan Clark, Planner
BI Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Preliminary Final Plat Combo, consisting of approximately 23.62 acres out of the
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 14
March 15, 2022
Anthony Flores Survey, Abstract 235, N. Porter Survey, Abstract 497, and William Addison
Survey Abstract 21, generally located at 1101 N College St to be known as City of Georgetown
Transfer Station - Fuel Farm Reconstruction (2022-10-SDP) - Ryan Clark, Planner
BJ Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 0.860 acres in the Lot 2,
Block A, Opportunity Business Park, Recorded Doc No. 2021077941, generally located at 1010 FM
1460 to be known as Huq Office Condominiums (2022-11-SDP) -- Ethan Harwell, Senior Planner
BK Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 19.02 acres in the Barney C
Low Survey, Abstract No. 385, generally located at 5201 N Mays St to be known as Summit at
Westinghouse Zone 2A (2022-13-SDP) -- Ethan Harwell, Senior Planner
BL Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 27.704 acres in the AW0013
Wright, D. Survey and AW0051 - Berry, J. Survey, generally located at 500, 600 State Highway 130
to be known as Gateway 35 Buildings 2 + 3 (2022-14-SDP) -- Ethan Harwell, Senior Planner
BM Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 129.131 acres in the W.
Stubblefield Survey, Abstract 556 generally located at 1500 Lawhon Ln to be known as Lawhon
Site (2022-12-SDP) - Ryan Clark, Planner
Action on Consent Agenda items: Commissioner Stanley recused himself with a Conflict of
Interest disclosure form filed. Commissioner Haynie recused himself with a Conflict of Interest
disclosure form filed.
Item C was moved from the Consent items and to Legislative Regular because the approval status
changed after the posting of the agenda.
Motion to approve the Consent Agenda by Commissioner Noble, except for item C which was
moved to the Legislative Regular Agenda by staff. Second by Commissioner Heintzmann.
Approved 5-0, Stanley and Haynie were recused for conflict of interest.
Legislative Regular Agenda
C Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application
for a Traffic Impact Analysis, consisting of approximately 77.830 acres in the Woodruff
Stubblefield Sur. Abstract No. 556, generally located at Bell Gin and Sam Houston to be known as
Lawhon Tract (2021-8-TIA) -David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
Travis Baird presented the item, explaining that the applicant posted the fiscal surety, so this was
now recommended for approval. Commissioners did not have any questions.
Chair Perthuis opened the Public Hearing and closed it with no one coming forward.
Motion by Stanley, second by Heintzmann to approve this item as presented. Approved 7 - 0.
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 8 of 14
March 15, 2022
BN Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP) for the Accessory
Dwelling Unit specific use in the Residential Single -Family (RS) zoning district, on the property
located at 1808 Knight Street, bearing the legal description of Lots 3, 4, Block 5, Eubank Addition
(2022-1-SUP). Nat Waggoner, PMP, AICP, Asst. Planning Dir. - Long Range
Sofia Nelson presented the report which included how this proposed use complies and almost
complies with the Code. The SUP is for an accessory structure on top o the garage. It meets the
requirements by being < 25% of the primary structure, having three parking places, all structures,
must be on the same water and electric meter, this can be used as a rental only if the main
structure is owner occupied, and this does structure does not include a full kitchen (stove).
Notices were sent and the Planning department received no opposition and one response in favor
of the project. HARC already voted to approve the site plan.
Chair Perthuis opened the Public Hearing and closed it with no one coming forward, except
Richard Maier the owner who stated he would answer questions if anyone had any.
Motion to approve Item BN by Noble. Second by Heintzmann. Approved 7 - 0.
BO Public Hearing and Possible Action on a request for a zoning Map Amendment to zone, upon
annexation, a 101.24-acre tract out of the John Berry Survey, Abstract No. 51 to the Residential
Single -Family (RS) and Agriculture (AG) zoning districts for the property generally located south
of CR 152 and east of Tom McDaniel Parkway (2021-17-ANX). Cesar Acosta, Long Range Planner
Cesar Acosta presented the report which included maps and compliance with the Comprehensive
Plan and Unified Development Code Section 3.06.030. He explained there is not currently any
wastewater capacity installed for this subdivision and CR 152 is not currently able to handle this
extra capacity and there are no planned improvements for the road. Notices were sent to 5
surrounding property owners and all five wrote back in opposition. Acosta also explained that
the property is currently in the county and would be allowed by right to build an RV Park in this
location, however they are being annexed into the city to establish wastewater and once annexed,
they would not be allowed to build ari RV Park by right, but would require an SUP to build it.
Chair Perthuis opened the Public Hearing.
Hayden LaRoclnelle lives on CR 152 and stated the homes in this area are currently on two to ten
acre lots, not multiple homes on one acre as proposed. He stated CR 152 is not upgraded enough
to handle the traffic that is currently going down the road, much less the addition of this many
new homes. He also expressed concern about the impact on Berry Creek.
Steve Skeels, lives on CR 152 and affirms Mr. LaRochelle's comments, asking for a denial of this
application.
Teresa Person, received three additional minutes from Carmen Moser, she lives on CR 152 only
one-half mile from the subject property. She is opposed to the development and says it does not
fit the neighborhood character. She showed examples of the condition of CR 152 and how it is not
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 9 of 14
March 15, 2022
able to support this development. She also showed a sign that has been posted stating that the
developer is already planning an RV Park for that area.
Motion by Heintzmann to deny this application as it was presented. Second by Dickey. This
motion for denial was approved 7 - 0.
BP Public Hearing and Possible Action on a request for a zoning Map Amendment to zone, upon
annexation, a 5.815-acre tract out of the L.J. Dyches Survey, Abstract No. 180 to the Industrial (IN)
zoning district for the property generally located south of Blue Springs Boulevard and east of
Rabbit Hill Road (2021-18-ANX). Cesar Acosta, Long Range Planner
Cesar Acosta presented the report which included maps and compliance with the Comprehensive
Plan and Unified Development Code Section 3.06.030. The applicant is asking for Industrial
zoning to place an employment center use on this property, including warehouses and storage.
This would be located on the lot directly east of the travel center, wand would not have direct
access to the frontage road. This application partially complies with the comprehensive plan and
would be putting the area close to the 80% maximum use of non-residential properties. He also
cited this is less than a mile from residential neighborhoods and does not match the character of
the area. The suitability of this property near Rabbit Hill Road is not there. He explained the
required notices were sent and no comments were received.
Commissioners asked about the adjacent properties and the requirement of the developer to
improve the road. Acosta stated the applicant would have to improve the road up to the
standards required for an Industrial use.
Chair Perthuis opened the Public Hearing and closed it with no one coming forward.
Motion to approve Item BP by Haynie. Second by Noble. Approved 6 -1. Heintzmann
opposed.
BQ Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone 5.5 acres
situated in the Antonio Manchaca Survey, Abstract No. 421, from the General Commercial (C-3)
zoning district to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning district with a base zoning of
General Commercial (C-3), for the property generally located at the southwest corner of the IH-35
frontage road and CR 143 (2022-3-PUD). Sofia Nelson, Planning Director
Chair Perthuis recused himself from the dais with a Conflict of Interest form filed with the
secretary. Vice -Chair Heintzmann opened the item.
Sofia Nelson presented the report and showed the presentation which included the location of the
property, and an explanation of why the applicant is requesting a PUD with a base zone of C-3.
The C-3 zoning district allows a major event or entertainment center with an SUP, but the
applicant is seeking a PUD so that they can install a 400 foot tall flag pole with a 9800 square foot
flag, metal walls, parking and landscaping, all by -right. Nelson showed other area landmarks,
including the county courthouse which is only 89 feet tall.
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 10 of 14
March 15, 2022
Nelson reported the Unified Development Code allows a 25 foot flagpole and a 40 square foot
flag, with restricted signs. The signs requested for this project are 10-foot panels for a total of
8160 square foot, however the panels will face the interior of the site. They will also be installing
lighting which will extend beyond the property line, which is also against the code allowances.
Nelson reviewed the criteria which should have compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff
has determined that the proposed request meets 2 of the 11 criteria, and partially complies with 4
of the 11 criteria, as established in UDC Section 3.06.030 and 3.06.040 for a Planned Unit
Development (PUD) as outlined in the attached Staff Report.
She explained that this is on a gateway to the city and on an image corridor, and this does not
meet the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. The report shows this is not suitable zoning for this
area and is not consistent with the other nearby properties or the comprehensive plan. This does
not comply with fitting in with the other adjacent uses. She reports this does not maximize the
natural and manmade environments, and this project does not create a recreational environment
for all the community, only a portion of the community.
Commissioners asked questions of Nelson that she clarified for them. Heintzmann asked the
applicant, Mr. Randy Mongold, to come forward for questions. Mr. Mongold provided a
handout for the commissioners. He also stated the staff report was inaccurate and that the metal
panels were actually to be constructed of concrete and the lighting would be installed inside the
circle, pointing up at the flagpole, not onto adjacent properties.
Heintzmann questioned the structure of the pole and the ability of the applicant to insure it
would not fall, considering the proximity to the highway. Mongold stated this was an engineered
project and that it was designed to withstand a 200 mile an hour wind. Heintzmann explained
she was in San Antonio and part of the company that built the tallest freestanding cell tower and
it was engineered as well. But it still fell with a tornado microburst in 2017, and damaged several
structures and created several injuries. And she pointed out that the bad tornado that hit Jarrell
before was 267 mph.
Commissioner Dickey asked about the traffic this would generate and if there was any plan to
mitigate it. Mongold stated the monument would be available 24/7 and there were no current
traffic plans. Commissioner Stanley asked about the maintenance of the pole. Mongold said they
have set up a fund and there are several donations which would keep this maintained in
perpetuity. They would also be selling 50,000 bricks which would be laid inside the flag circle.
There is a Board of Directors which is being worked out and there is expected to be a Friends of
the Flag organization to help with grounds maintenance. Commissioner Tiland asked if the pole
could be used for streaming of video. Mongold said they could put cameras on the top which
would capture north and southbound IH 35.
Vice Chair Heintzmann opened the Public Hearing.
Cindy Scott, Oakmont Drive, reminded the commissioners that this pole would be five times the
height of the courthouse. And the code would not allow a 40 story building in this area, so why
would they allow a 400 foot flagpole. She explained the flag would be the size of a football field
and would be very hard to manage and maintain. The lights must be bright enough to illuminate
the flag and will also illuminate the night sky for miles. She says this will be an obtrusion for all
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 11 of 14
March 15, 2022
the people living anywhere within 15 miles of it and asked the commissioners to deny this
request.
Larry Mladek, Falcon Cove, wants this flagpole approved so others can learn the history of
Williamson County and honor those who served in the military. He believes this wall will heal
veterans and bring revenue to county with visitors and asks for Americans to approve this flag.
James Lee Robinson, Chairman of the Williamson County Memorial, wants to go on record as
supporting this proposal, stating it will not be in competition with the memorial in Sun City.
Vice -Chair Heintzmann closed the Public Hearing with no other speakers coming forth.
Heintzmann says she appreciates the spirit of the project, but has concerns about the location and
safety, regardless of the amount of engineering, Haynie says he believes in the science of the
design and the engineering. Noble says he thinks this is a unique project and though he is
skeptical, he wants the discussion to be held at the Council level.
Motion to approve Item BQ as described by Haynie. Second by Noble. Approved 5-1-1
(Heintzmann opposed, Perthuis recused).
Chair Perthuis returned to the dais.
BR Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Subdivision Variance to waive the
requirement of Section 12.02.020 of the Unified Development Code requiring the dedication of
right of way along Williams Drive, for the property located at the southeast corner of Williams
Drive and Jim Hogg Rd, bearing the legal description of Lot 1 & Lot 2, Jim Hogg Addition. (2022
1-WAV)-David Munk, Utility Engineer & Travis Baird, Assistant Planning Director
Travis Baird presented the overview. The applicant has previously submitted an application for
replat of Lot 2, Block 1 of the Jim Hogg Addition, bearing the City of Georgetown project number
2021-72-FP. That plat application has been reviewed by staff and disapproved by the Planning
and Zoning Commission at the November 16th and December 7, 2021 meetings based on multiple
comments, including a requirement to dedicate adequate right of way along the south side of
Williams Drive, with a width of approximately 7.5 feet, in accordance with 12.02.020 of the
Unified Development Code. The applicant is requesting a waiver of this Code requirement,
specifically the requirement dedicate the right of way as noted in 12.02.020, "... Developers share
the responsibility of providing adequate streets through compliance with the minimum standards
governing internal and perimeter streets.." The applicant is requesting that the City waive the
requirement for the right of way to be "adequate", in that the proposed right of way to be
dedicated is currently encumbered by a Pedernales Electric Cooperative easement that does not
contain any improvements. The applicant's request, if granted, would allow the right of way to
be accepted by the City without a requirement to first have the PEC easement released. Notices
were sent and zero comments were received.
Chair Perthuis opened the Public Hearing and closed it with no one coming forward.
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 12 of 14
March'15, 2022
Stanley asked for clarification that if this variance is granted, it would make it easier for the city to
move forward with widening Williams Drive in this area. Baird says it would make it easier for
the applicant to dedicate the ROW, which would make it easier for the city to widen Williams and
install utilities.
Motion by Noble to approve a Subdivision Variance to waive the requirement of Section
12.02.020 of the Unified Development Code requiring that the dedication of right of way along
Williams Drive be "adequate", subject to the requirement that the applicant dedicate an
approximately 7.5 ft wide strip of land along Williams Drive to the City of Georgetown as
public right of way based on the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety or welfare of injurious to other property in the area or to the City in
administering this code; that the granting of the variance would not substantially conflict with
the Comprehensive Plan and the purposes of this Code; that the conditions that create the need
for the variance do not generally apply to other property in the vicinity; and where literal
enforcement of these regulations would result in an unnecessary hardship. Second by Noble.
Approved 6 - 0 (Haynie stepped off dais.)
BS Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Subdivision Variance to waive the
requirement of Section 13.02.020 and 13.07 of the Unified Development Code requiring the
extension of wastewater infrastructure, for the property located at the northeast corner of Ronald
Reagan Blvd and County Road 245, bearing the legal description of 4.421 acres out of the Lewis P.
Dyches Survey, Abstract No 171. (2022-3-WAV)-Wesley Wright, Systems Engineering Director &
Travis Baird, Assistant Planning Director
Wesley Wright presented the report. The applicant is requesting that the requirement to extend
certain wastewater infrastructure, according to the City's Continuity of Service policy as stated in
the UDC, be waived as it applies to the Subject Property. The applicant is proposing to connect
the subject property to the City's system via an existing "sleeve" under Ronal Reagan, located
south of the Subject. They describe this connection in their letter of intent, and share that all
properties to the north of the development are serviced via septic, and thus they believe the
cxtenbion of wastewater service across the subject beyond their propobed point of connection is
unnecessary. Notices were sent to adjacent property owners and no comments were received.
Chair Perthuis opened the Public Hearing and closed it with no one coming forward.
Motion by Noble to approve this request to not extend the wastewater connection as required
by code based on the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety or welfare of injurious to other property in the area or to the City in administering this
code; that the granting of the variance would not substantially conflict with the
Comprehensive Plan and the purposes of this Code; that the conditions that create the need for
the variance do not generally apply to other property in the vicinity; and where literal
enforcement of these regulations would result in an unnecessary hardship. Second by Dickey.
Approved 7 - 0.
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 13 of 14
March 15, 2022
Adjournment
Motion to adjourn by Commissioner Haynie. Second by Commissioner Noble. Approved 7-0.
Adjourned at 8.00 p.m.
Travis Perthuis, Chair Attest, Stev ickey, Se etary
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 14 of 14
March 15, 2022