HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes P&Z 12.07.2021City of Georgetown, Texas
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes
Tuesday, December 7, 2021 at 6:00 p.m.
Courts and Council Building, located at 510 W. 91" Street, Georgetown, TX 78626
Commissioners Present: Tim Haynie; Kaylah McCord; Jay Warren; Travis Perthuis; Doug Noble
Commissioner Absent: Chris Stanley; Chere Heintzmann
Alternate Commissioners Absent: Jim Salyer; Terry Williams; Mike Price; Mike Tiland
Staff Present: Sofia Nelson, Planning Director; Ethan Harwell, Senior Planner; David Munk, Utility
Engineer; Lua Saluone, Utility Engineer; Mirna Garcia, Program Manager; Michael Patroski, Planner;
Grant White, Associate Planner; Travis Baird, Assistant Director; Cesar Acosta, Senior Planner; Nat
Waggoner, Assistant Director; Britin Bostick, Historic Planner; Will Parrish, Transportation Planning
Coordinator; Ryan Clark, Planner; Wesley Wright, Systems Engineer Director
Chair Perthuis called the meeting to order at 6:00pm.
Public Wishing to Address the Board
On a subject that is posted on this agenda: Please fill out a speaker registration form which can be
found at the Board meeting. Clearly print your name, the letter of the item on which you wish to speak,
and present it to the Staff Liaison, preferably prior to the start of the meeting. You will be called
forward to speak when the Board considers that item.
On a subject not posted on the agenda: Persons may add an item to a future Board agenda by filing a
written request with the Staff Liaison no later than one week prior to the Board meeting. The request
must include the speaker's name and the specific topic to be addressed with sufficient information to
inform the board and the public. For Board Liaison contact information, please logon
to http://government.georgetown.org/category/boards-commissions/.
A. At the time of posting, no persons had signed up to address the Board.
Consent Agenda
The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non -controversial and routine items that may be acted
upon with onq single vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be
discussed and acted upon individually as part of the Regular Agenda.
B Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes from the November 2 and 16, 2021
regular meetings of the Planning and Zoning Commission -- Mirna Garcia, Program Manager
C Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application
for a Traffic Impact Analysis, consisting of approximately 20.26 acres in the Isaac Donagan Survey,
Abs No. 178, generally located at 3701 W SH 29 to be known as The Preserve at Water Oak (2021-5-
TIA) — David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 16
December 7, 2021
D Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of approximately 42.33 acres in the William Addison
Survey, Abstract No. 21 generally located northeast of E University Ave and NE Inner Loop to be
known as Gtown 42 (2021-13-PP) -- Ethan Harwell, Senior Planner
E Consideration and possible action to approve with the conditions set forth in the item an
application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of approximately 47.83 acres in the Lewis P. Dyches
Survey, Abstract No. 171, generally located at 7811 RM 2338 to be known as Broken Oak
Subdivision (2021-16-PP) — Ryan Clark, Planner
F Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of approximately 103.92 acres in the Isaac Donagan
Survey Abstract No. 178, and the Joseph Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 608, generally located at
3301 W. SH-29 to be known as Heights at San Gabriel (2021-18-PP) —Travis Baird, Asst. Planning
Director
G Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of
an approximate 146.786-acre tract of land out of the Woodruff Stubblefield Survey, Abstract No.
556, generally located at 1500 Lawhon Lane to be known as Lawhon Tract (2021-20-PP) -- Michael
Patroski, Planner
H Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of approximately 100.390 acres tract situated in the
Isaac Donagan Survey, Abstract Number 178, generally located at 4901 West Highway 29 to be
known as Cole Estates Subdivision (2021-22-PP) -- Michael Patroski, Planner
Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application
for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of approximately 224.705 acres in the Williams Roberts Survey,
Abstract No. 524, generally located at 4805 N IH 35 to be known as Jackson Shaw Georgetown
(2021-26-PP) -- Ethan Harwell, Senior Planner
J Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application
for Construction Plans, consisting of approximately 16.702 acres in the Joseph Fish Survey, Abstract
No. 232, generally located at 4631 Williams Dr to be known as Wildwood at Williams Wastewater
Line (2020-37-CON) — David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
K Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for Construction Plans, consisting of approximately 28.13 acres in the Issac Donagan
Survey, Abs No. 172, generally located south of the intersection of SH 29 and Crescent Bluff Dr. to
be known as Crescent Bluff Section 5 (2021-10-CON) — David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility
Engineering
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 16
December 7, 2021
L Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application
for Construction Plans, consisting of approximately 133.084 acres in the F Foy Sur., A-229, generally
located at 1100 Silver Spur Blvd to be known as Somerset Hills Phases A-E (2021-21-CON) — David
Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
M Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application
for Construction Plans, consisting of approximately 56.47 acres in the Isaac Donagan Survey,
Abstract No.178, generally located at 3301 W SH 29 to be known as Heights of San Gabriel (Phase
1) (2021-31-CON) — David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
N Consideration and possible action to approve application for Construction Plans, consisting of
approximately 36.659 acres in the J. Thomas Survey, Abstract No. 608, generally located southwest
of Wolf Ranch Parkway and Legends Ln to be known as Wolf Ranch West Section 5 (2021-34-CON)
— David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
O Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application
for Construction Plans, consisting of approximately 29.9 acres in the Charles H. Delaney Survey,
Abstract No. 181, generally located at 10128 RM 2338 to be known as Parmer Ranch Boulevard
Phase 2 (2021-36-CON) — David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
P Consideration and possible action to approve application for Construction Plans, consisting of
approximately 5.53 acres in the J. Pulsifer Survey, Abstract No. 498, generally located at east of Wolf
Ranch Parkway and Sunset Vista to be known as Wolf Lakes Village Section 1 Phase 3 (2021-37-
CON) — David. Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
Q Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Preliminary Final Plat Combo, consisting of approximately 49.915 acres in the
David Wright Survey, Abstract No.13, generally located at 1800 Aviation Drive to be known as
Georgetown Logistics (2021-12-PFP) -- Ethan Harwell, Senior Planner
R Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Final Plat, consisting of
approximately 18.83 acres in the Joseph Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 608, generally located
North of FM 2243 and Greenview Way to be known as Parkside on the River; Phase Z. Section 2
(2020-64-FP) --i Michael Patroski, Planner
S Consideration and possible action to approve with the conditions set forth in the item an
application for a Replat, consisting of approximately 10.298 acres of Lot 10A of the Amended Plat
Lake Georgetown Estates II, generally located at 1720 CR 262 to be known as Lot 10A of the
Amended Plat Lake Georgetown Estates H (2021-2-FP) -- Michael Patroski, Planner
T Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 31.638 acres in the I. Donagan survey,
generally located at SH 29 and Parkside Parkway to be known as Water Oak North, Section 6 (2021-
12-FP) — Ryan Clark, Planner
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 16
December 7, 2021
U Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Minor Plat, consisting of approximately 16.737 acres in the Burrell Eaves Survey,
Abstract No. 216, generally located at 2201 SH 195 to be known as Alta Berry Creek Multifamily
(2021-27-FP) -- Michael Patroski, Planner
V Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 40.024 acres in the I.&G.N. R.R. Co. Survey,
Abs No. 744, J.D. Johns Survey, Abs No. 365, and the J. Thompson Survey, Abs No. 608, generally
located at Parkside Parkway to be known as Parkside on the River Phase 3, Section 2 (2021-29-FP) --
Michael Patroski, Planner
W Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 30.984 acres in the I.&G.N. R.R. Co. Survey,
Abstract No. 744, W.E. Pate Survey, Abs No. 836, Joseph Thompson Survey, Abs No. 608, and J.D.
Johns Survey, Abstract No. 365, generally located at Parkside Parkway to be known as Parkside on
the River Phase 3, Sections 3A and 3B (2021-30-FP) -- Michael Patroski, Planner
X Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Final Plat, consisting of
approximately 2.817 acres in the Nicholas Porter Survey, Abstract No. 497, generally located at 2201
Rivery Boulevard to be known as Replat of Lot 1, of Northwest Crossing (2021-44-FP) — Ryan Clark,
Planner
Y Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Final Plat, consisting of
approximately 15.459 acres in the Joseph P. Pulsifer Survey, Abstract No. 498, generally located at
1010 W University Ave to be known as Wolf Lakes Village, Section 3 (2021-60-FP) -- Ethan Harwell,
Senior Planner
Z Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Final Plat, consisting of a 46.735-acre tract situated in the Isaac Donagan Survey,
Abstract Number 178, generally located at 4901 West Highway 29 to be known as Cole Estates
Subdivision Phase 1 & 2 (2021-65-FP) -- Michael Patroski, Planner
AA Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 4.421 acres in the Lewis P. Dyches Survey,
abstract No.171, generally located at 29901 Ronald Reagan Blvd. to be known as Highland Village
Commercial (2021-71-FP) — Ryan Clark, Planner
AB Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Replat, consisting of approximately 1.5028 acres in the J. Southerland Survey,
Abstract No. 553, generally located at SE Comer of Williams Dr and Jim Hogg Dr to be known as
Jim Hogg Second Addition (2021-72-FP) — Ryan Clark, Planner
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 16
December 7, 2021
AC Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 56.071 acres in the David Wright Survey,
Abstract No. 13, generally located at 2250 N IH 35 to be known as Titan Gateway 35 Phase 3 (2021-
77-FP) -- Ethan Harwell, Senior Planner
AD Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 52.038 acres in the Hudson Survey,
Abstract No. 295, J.S. Patterson Survey, Abstract No. 502, WM Addison Survey, Abstract No. 21,
and Joseph Robertson Survey, Abstract No. 545, generally located at 2211 Westinghouse to be
known as Oasis at Georgetown (2021-79-FP) -- Michael Patroski, Planner
AE Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Minor Site
Development Plan, consisting of approximately 1.032 acres in Lot 1 Block M Carlson Place Phase E,
generally located at 2301 Cliffbrake Way to be known as Carlson Place Amenity Center (2019-84-
SDP) — Michael Patroski, Planner
AF Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 24.74 acres in the Antonio
Flores Survey, Abstract 235 generally located at 2601 North Austin Avenue to be known as Alta
Georgetown (2020-43-SDP) -- Michael Patroski, Planner
AG Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 0.503 acres being Lots 6,7 & 8,
Block 38, City of Georgetown, generally located at 601 South Austin Avenue to be known as Todos
Santos (2020-61-SDP) -- Britin Bostick, Downtown & Historic Planner
AH Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Site Development Plan,
consisting of approximately 84.583 acres in the J. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 608, generally
located at 101 River Overlook Rd to be known as Wolf Ranch 1AG Amenity Center (2020-71-SDP) --
Michael Patroski, Planner
AI Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Site Development Plan,
consisting of approximately 1.47 acr. s in the 1 1 acres in the Issas Donagan Survey, Abstract 1`?0.
172, generally located at 601 Crescent Heights Drive to be known as Crescent Bluff Amenity Center
(2021-11-SDP) Ryan Clark, Planner
AJ Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Site Development Plan,
consisting of approximately 16.248 acres in the Williams Addison Survey, Abstract No. 21,
generally located at 2510 Bell Gin Rd. to be known as Saddlecreek Multi -Family (2021-20-SDP) --
Michael Patroski, Planner
AK Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 16.737 acres in the Burrell
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 16
December 7, 2021
Eaves Survey, Abstract 216, generally located at 2201 SH 195 to be known as Alta Berry Creek
(2021-27-SDP) -- Michael Patroski, Planner
AL Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 9.66 acres in the Lot 1, Block
A, Novak Village Apartments Subdivision, generally located at 120 Boselli Way to be known as
Novak Village (2021-30-SDP) — Sofia Nelson, Planning Director
AM Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 20.47 acres of land in the
William Addison Survey Abstract No. 21, generally located at 2050 Rockride Lane to be known as
R.O.C.K (2021-40-SDP) -- Michael Patroski, Planner
AN Consideration and possible action to approval an application for a Site Development
Plan, consisting of approximately 2.187 acres in the Barney C. Low Survey, Abstract No. 385,
generally located at 5510 N. Mays Street to be known as Mays Street Retail Center (2021-45-SDP) --
Michael Patroski, Planner
AO Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Site Development
Plan, consisting of Lot 1, Sun City Neighborhood 72-A, generally located at 701 Silver Spur Blvd to
be known as Sun City Northpoint Amenity Center (2021-54-SDP) — Ryan Clark, Planner
AP Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 6.079 acres in the C.
Stubblefield Survey, Abstract No 558, generally located at 934 West University to be known as
Hotel Development (2021-66-SDP) -- Michael Patroski, Planner
AQ Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 1.45 acres in Bluebonnet
Plaza, Lot 1, generally located at 1309 W. University Ave. to be known as Dutch Bros Coffee (2021-
68-SDP) — Ryan Clark, Planner
ATE i'nngirdorai-inn and possible action to disapprove for the reason--, set forth in the item all
application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 85.734 acres in the David
Wright Survey, Abstract No.13 and the John Berry Survey, Abstract No. 51, generally located at
2550 N. IH 35 to be known as 2250 N IH-35 Distribution Facility (2021-69-SDP) — Ethan Harwell,
Senior Planner
AS Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item application
for Driveway Access Permit, consisting of approximately 43.418 acres in the L.J. Dyches Survey
Abstract No.180, generally located at 600 SE Inner Loop to be known as Molto Georgetown (2021-2-
DWP) — David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 16
December 7, 2021
AT Consideration and possible action to approval for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Heritage Tree Removal & Pruning Permit, for the property located at 1415 Scenic
Oaks Dr, bearing the legal description of Lot 25, BLOCK H, HIDDEN OAKS AT BERRY CREEK PH
1 (AMD), (2021-58-HT) -- Steve McKeown, Landscape Planner
AU Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning
Permit, for the property located at Open area Between Lots 16 & 17, bearing the legal description of
2.14 acres in the Frederick Foy Survey, Abstract No. 229 (2021-62-HT) - Steve McKeown, Landscape
Planner -
AV Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning
Permit, for the property located at Sun City NH 80, adjacent to Lot 12, Block B, bearing the legal
description of 1 acre in the Frederick Foy Survey, Abstract No. 229 (2021-63-HT) - Steve McKeown,
Landscape Planner -
AW Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning
Permit, for the property located at Sun City NH 78, Lot 26, Block B, bearing the legal description of
9,042 square feet in the Frederick Foy Survey, Abstract No. 229 (2021-64-HT) - Steve McKeown,
Landscape Planner -
AX Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning
Permit, for the property located at Sun City NH 78, Lot 12, Block B, bearing the legal description of
9,802 square feet in the Frederick Foy Survey, Abstract No. 229 (2021-65-HT) - Steve McKeown,
Landscape Planner -
AY Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning
Permit, for the property located at 101 Bellows St, bearing the legal description of Lot 1, Block D,
Sun City Neighborhood 78 (2021-66-HT) - Steve McKeown, Landscape Planner -
AZ Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning
Permit, for the property located at Sun City NH 77, Lot 17, Block A, bearing the legal description of
13.28 acres in the Frederick Foy Survey, Abstract 229 (2021-67 nT) - Sieve McKeown, Laiidscape
Planner -
BA Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning
Permit, for the property located at Sun City NH 77, Lot 9, Block D, bearing the legal description of
13.28 acres in the Frederick Foy Survey, Abstract No. 229 (2021-68-HT) - Steve McKeown,
Landscape Planner -
BB Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning
Permit, for the property located at Sun City NH 77, Lot 16, Block B, bearing the legal description of
13.28 acres in the Frederick Foy Survey, Abstract 229 (2021-69-HT) - Steve McKeown, Landscape
Planner -
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 16
December 7, 2021
BC Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning
Permit, for the property located at Sun City NH 77, Lot 5, Block A, bearing the legal description of
13.28 acres in the Frederick Foy Survey, Abstract 229 (2021-70-HT) - Steve McKeown, Landscape
Planner -
BD Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning
Permit, for the'property located at 348 Kitty Hawk Rd, bearing the legal description of Lot 11, Block
D, Sun City Neighborhood 68, (2021-71-HT) - Steve McKeown, Landscape Planner -
BE Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Heritage Tree Pruning Permit, for the property located at 309 Cimarron Hills Trail,
bearing the legal description of Lot 42, Block C, Section 2, Phase 3, Cimarron Hills, (2021-72-HT) -
Steve McKeown, Landscape Planner -
BF Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning
Permit, for the property located at 126 King Thistle Ct, bearing the legal description of Lot 9, Block
A, Phase 1, Hidden Oak, (2021-73-HT) - Steve McKeown, Landscape Planner
BG Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning
Permit, for the property located at 1177 Silver Dollar Trail, bearing the legal description of Lot 62,
Block B, Section 4A, Wolf Ranch West, (2021-74-HT) - Steve McKeown, Landscape Planner -
BH Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning
Permit, for the property located at 1110 Silver Dollar Trail, bearing the legal description of Lot 26,
Block C, Section 4A, Wolf Ranch West, (2021-75-HT) - Steve McKeown, Landscape Planner -
BI Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning
Permit, for the property located at 705 North Fork Trail, bearing the legal description of Lot 97,
Block B, Phase 3, Lakeside, (2021-76-HT) - Steve McKeown, Landscape Planner -
BT Consideration and possible action to approve an application .for a Heritage Tree Pruning
Permit, for the property located at 813 North Fork Trail, bearing the legal description of Lot 91,
Block B, Phase 3, Lakeside, (2021-77-HT) - Steve McKeown, Landscape Planner -
BK Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning
Permit, for the property located at 814 North Fork Trail, bearing the legal description of Lot 12,
Block K, Phase 3, Lakeside, (2021-78-HT) - Steve McKeown, Landscape Planner -
BL Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning
Permit, for the property located at 713 North Fork Trail, bearing the legal description of Lot 95,
Block B, Phase 3, Lakeside, (2021-79-HT) - Steve McKeown, Landscape Planner -
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page S of 16
December 7, 2021
BM Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Heritage Tree Pruning
Permit, for the property located at 208 Water Song Ln, bearing the legal description of Lot 157,
Section 2, Phase 2, Cimarron Hills, (2021-80-HT) - Steve McKeown, Landscape Planner -
BN Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Heritage Tree Pruning Permit, for the property located at 108 Fairway Lane,
bearing the legal description of Lot 5, Block I, Phase 1, Hidden Oaks at Berry Creek, (2021-81-HT) -
Steve McKeown, Landscape Planner -
Commissioner Haynie abstained from the Consent Agenda.
Chair Perthuis requested that item AT be moved to the Legislative Regular Agenda. Staff requested
Item L be moved to the Legislative Regular Agenda.
Motion to approve the Consent Agenda as presented except for Item L and AT by Commissioner
Warren. Second by Commissioner Noble. Approved 4-0 with Commissioner Haynie abstained.
Commissioner Haynie returned to the dais.
Legislative Regular Agenda
L Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item
application for Construction Plans, consisting of approximately 133.084 acres in the F Foy Sur., A-
229, generally located at 1100 Silver Spur Blvd to be known as Somerset Hills Phases A-E (2021-21-
CON) — David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering
Report by Saluone. At the time of agenda posting, the applicant had outstanding fees. Since agenda
posting the applicant has made all outstanding fees. Staff seek approval of the item.
Motion to approve Item L (2021-21-CON) by Commissioner McCord. Second by Commissioner
Haynie. Approved 5-0.
AT Consideration and possible action, to approval for the reasons set forth in the item an
application for a Heritage Tree Removal & Pruning Permit, for the property located at 1415 Scenic
Oaks Dr, bearing the legal description of Lot 25, BLOCK H, HIDDEN OAKS AT BERRY CREEK PH
1 (AMD), (2021-58-HT) -- Steve McKeown, Landscape Planner
Report by Harwell.
Motion to disapprove Item AT (2021-58-HT) by Chair Perthuis. Second by Commissioner
Warren. Motion passes 5-0.
BO Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment
to adjust the Overall Transportation Plan to realign the proposed extension of Sanaloma Drive, a
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 9 of 16
December 7, 2021 t
Collector Road, across the property generally located between Airport Road and IH-35 north of
Aviation Drive and south of Berry Creek Drive, (2021-1-CPA). Ethan Harwell, Senior Planner and
Will Parrish, AICP, CNU-A, Transportation Planning Coordinator
Staff report by Parrish. Comprehensive Plan Amendment to modify the Overall Transportation to
adjust the Overall Transportation Plan to realign the proposed extension of Sanaloma Drive, a
Collector Road, across the property generally located between Airport Road and IH-35 north of
Aviation Drive and south of Berry Creek Drive. The Overall Transportation Plan identifies a
Collector Road (AKA a Major Collector Road in UDC 12.02) that is planned to extend north from
Aviation Drive and ultimately connect back to Airport Road. The request proposes to realign this
proposed road to intersect with IH-35 instead of Aviation Drive. The applicant's letter of intent
(Exhibit 5) outlines the specifics of the request. The proposed Sanaloma Drive Extension is located
between Airport Road and IH-35, north of the Aviation Drive Extension and south of Berry Creek
and Berry Creek Drive. The area to the south of the proposed roadway has seen rapid industrial
development over the last 2 years. Large scale warehousing and distribution facilities have been
constructed along the extension of Aviation Drive and the expansion of Airport Road. The
properties to the north of the proposed PUD are all bounded by Airport Road and Berry Creek and
have no direct, access to IH-35. These properties are undeveloped and used for agricultural
purposes. The 2015 Overall Transportation Plan update serves to recommend new roadway
locations and functional classifications, and improved design recommendations through the
implementation of Context Sensitive Solutions. Collector roads are intended to balance traffic
between arterial streets and local streets. These streets tend to carry a high volume of traffic over
shorter distances, providing access and movement between neighborhoods, parks, schools, retail
areas and the arterial street system. This Collector road originally was planned to provide
additional circulation and access to property between Airport Road and IH-35, including a large
Planned Unit Development just to the north of the proposed Titan Industrial Park. The applicant
proposes to realign a Collector that would have connected Airport Road (a Minor Arterial) to
Aviation Drive (a Minor Arterial). Rather, the applicant is proposing to shift the alignment of the
Collector so that it connects Airport Road with the IH-35 Frontage Road (a Major Arterial/Freeway).
Chair Perthuis opened the Public Hearing.
Allen Buie, 7801 Image Cove, commented that his parents own the property that the proposed road
would cut through. He explained that his parents have owned this property for almost 50 years,
and this project would cut the property and affect his elderly parents. He is opposed.
Dora Buie, 6025 Airport Rd., is also opposed to the project.
Mark Baker, SEC Planning, has worked with the family for several years and commented on his
opposition as well. He only saw the item the previous night and upon initial review, felt that the
property owners should have been contacted and the applicant should have included the owners in
discussion.
Chair Perthuis closed the Public Hearing.
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 10 of 16
December 7, 2021
Commissioner Warren asked who owns the dirt currently where the proposed alignment will run.
Harwell explained it is owned partially by the developer and partially by the Buie's.
Chair Perthuis asked what the options are if no decision is made tonight. Harwell explained the
Commission can vote to deny or vote to table the item to a future meeting.
The applicant, Clayton Strolle, addressed the Commission and explained the request. He would
prefer the Commission not deny the item tonight.
Motion to table the item to the 12/21 meeting by Chair Perthuis. Second by Commissioner
Warren, Approved 5-0.
BP Public Hearing and possible action on a Subdivision Variance from the Co ntinuity of
Improvements pursuant to Section 13.02.020 of the Unified Development Code, for the property
located at 3103 Shell Road, bearing the legal description of 39.506-acre tract of land located in the
William Roberts Survey, Abstract No. 524 (2021-15-WAV). David Munk, PE, Senior Utility Engineer
Report by Wright. The applicant is requesting a subdivision variance to UDC Section 13.02.020.
which states, All public improvements shall be designed and installed to provide for a logical
system of utilities, drainage and streets, and to create continuity of improvements for the
development of adjacent properties. All required public improvements shall be extended along the
boundary and/or through the subject property to the perimeter of the subject property. Utility
assignments are depicted in the Construction Manual. The subject property is located at 3103 Shell
Road, across from Grace Bible Church. North of the subject is the edge of Berry Creek which
includes a dry creek bed surrounded by a tree line that borders the park. Immediately north of the
park is the southeastern edge of the Sun City neighborhood, a development of age restricted single-
family homes. East of the subject property is an undeveloped parcel of land with a single residential
structure and a.private drive connecting to Shell Road. South of Shell Road opposite of the subject
property is the Grace Bible Church, a large structure with parking spaces to accommodate over 100
vehicles. South of the church are several residential structures and a grove of trees. West of the
subject property is largely undeveloped with a private drive running through it parallel to Shell
Road. The subject property is riirre-n under review for annexation.
Commissioner Noble asked if the line is at capacity. Wright explained that it is not, the line is new
and it is empty right now. There is plenty of capacity.
Chair Perthuis sought clarification regarding the approval criteria and the reasons criteria did not
comply. Wright explained that the city does not want to be in a position where code is not enforced
n the future leading to the city to have to build the lines.
Norm Ashby, the applicant, addressed the Commission and explained the request, and the meeting
with staff.
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 11 of 16
December 7, 2021
Motion to approve item BP (2021-15-WAV) by Commissioner Noble. Second by Commissioner
Warren. Approved 5-0.
BQ. Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to zone,
upon annexation, approximately 34.19 acre tract of land out of the William Addison Survey,
Abstract No. 21, to the Residential Single -Family (RS) zoning district, for the property generally
located at 2755 Rockride Lane (2021-9-ANX) — Cesar Acosta, Senior Planner
Staff report by Acosta. The applicant is requesting to annex the subject property into the city limits
with an initial zoning of Residential Single -Family (RS) in order to develop a residential
subdivision. The subject property is located on the east side of Rockride Lane, south of Sam
Houston Boulevard and approximately 2 miles west of State Highway 130. The property is
currently undeveloped and used as pasture. The subject property includes a narrow strip of land,
approximately 60 feet wide and half a mile long from Rockride Lane to the western portion of the
property. The western end of the property expands out to encompass the majority of the 34 acres
site. The majority of the property consists of pasture with no manmade structures present. A tree
line surrounds the northern and western border of the subject property. The subject property is in
the Edwards Aquifer Transition Zone and sits on a relatively flat plane. The applicant is requesting
that the entirety of the subject property be bought into the city limits with an initial zoning of
Residential Single -Family (RS) in order to develop their proposed community. The Residential
Single -Family (RS) zoning district allows for medium density and its minimum lot size is 5,500
square feet. The RS district contains standards for development that maintain single-family
neighborhood characteristics. The RS district may be located within proximity of
neighborhoodfriendly commercial and public services and protected from incompatible uses. All
housing types in the RS district shall use the lot, dimensional and design standards of the district.
Permitted land uses within the district include detached single-family homes and group homes
with 6 or less residents. Attached single-family homes, churches, family home day care, and schools
among other uses are permitted subject to specific design limitations to ensure compatibility with
the surrounding properties. Other uses such as accessory dwelling units, bed and breakfast, group
day care, general office and other similar uses may be permitted subject to approval of a Special
Use Permit (SUP). Exhibit 4 contains a comprehensive list of RS district permitted uses and
development standards.
Chair Perthuis opened and closed the Public Hearing as no one signed up to speak.
Motion to approve Item BQ (2021-9-ANX) by Commissioner Warren. Second by Commissioner
Haynie. Approved 5-0.
BR Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to zone,
upon annexation, approximately 10 acre tract of land out of the William Addison Survey, Abstract
No. 21, to the Residential Single -Family (RS) zoning district, for the property generally located at
200 Hillvue Road. (2021-12-ANX) — Cesar Acosta, Senior Planner
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 12 of 16
December 7, 2021
Report by Acosta. The applicant is requesting the annexation of the subject property with an initial
zoning designation of Residential Single -Family (RS). The subject property is located at 200 Hillvue
Road on the east side of FM 1460, south of Southeast Inner Loop and north of Westinghouse Road.
The subject property has a sparse grouping of trees along its eastern boundary with a westbound
private access road connecting the center of the property to FM 1460. There is a single home built at
the center of the property with two sheds located on the northeast and southwest sides. The subject
property is located within the Edwards Aquifer Transition Zone. The subject property has a Future
Land Use designation of Mixed -Density Neighborhood. There is no zoning designation on the
subject property as it is located in the ETJ. The subject property is surrounded on two sides by an
established single-family neighborhood. The properties to the west, southwest and northwest of the
subject property include low density residential and commercial uses. This is the second
development request for the subject property. On July 6, 2021 the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommended approval of an initial zoning to the Low Density Multi -family (MF1)
zoning district approved in a unanimous 5-0 decision. On July 27, 2021 City Council denied the first
reading of an ordinance with a 0-5 vote. The applicant is requesting that the entirety of the subject
property be brought into the city limits with an initial zoning of Residential Single -Family (RS) in
order to develop a residential subdivision. The Residential Single -Family (RS) zoning district allows
for medium density and its minimum lot size is 5,500 square feet. The RS district contains standards
for development that maintain single-family neighborhood characteristics. The RS district may be
located within proximity of neighborhood friendly commercial and public services and protected
from incompatible uses. All housing types in the RS district shall use the lot, dimensional and
design standards of the district. Permitted land uses within the district include detached single-
family homes and group homes with 6 or less residents. Attached single-family homes, churches,
family home day care, and schools among other uses are permitted subject to specific design
limitations to ensure compatibility with the surrounding properties. Other uses such as accessory
dwelling units, bed and breakfast, group day care, general office and other similar uses may be
permitted subject to approval of a Special Use Permit (SUP). Exhibit 4 contains a comprehensive list
of RS district permitted uses and development standards.
There was discussion and questions by the Commission regarding access to Hillview. The applicant
explained this ,is a shared road by the property owners and it currently serves 6 lots.
Chair Perthuis opened and closed the Public Hearing as no one signed up to speak.
Motion to approve Item BR (2021-12-ANX) by Commissioner Noble. Second by Commissioner
Haynie.Approved 5-0.
BS. Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to
rezone 10.526 acres in the William Roberts Survey, abstract No. 524, from the Agriculture (AG)
zoning district to the Low -Density Multi -Family (MF-1) and General Commercial (C-3) zoning
districts, for the property generally located 1581 State Highway 195 (2021-26-REZ). Ryan Clark,
Planner
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 13 of 16
December 7, 2021
Staff report by Clark. Zoning Map Amendment to rezone the subject property from the Agriculture
(AG) zoning district to the Low -Density Multi -Family (MF-1) zoning district. 4.726 acres will be
rezoned to C-3 and 5.8 will be rezoned to MF-1. The subject property is located along the frontage
of the southbound portion of State Highway 195 and is approximately 0.35 miles from the
intersection of 195 and Shell Road. The subject property vacant of any structures. The subject
property has a Mixed -Density Neighborhood Future Land Use designation and is currently zoned
Agriculture (AG). It is also part of the Highway Gateway Overlay District. The subject property is
currently not platted. It was annexed into the City in 2006 with the base zoning of AG. There has
not been a rezoning request for this property prior to this one. The Low Density Multi -Family (MF-
1) zoning district is intended for attached and detached multifamily residential development, such
as apartments, condominiums, triplexes, and fourplexes, at a density not to exceed 14 dwelling
units per acre. The MF-1 District is appropriate in areas designated on the Future Land Use Plan as
Mixed -Density Neighborhood or Community Center categories. Per UC Section 4.04.0101,
properties zoned MF-1 should have convenient access to major thoroughfares and arterial streets
and should not route traffic through lower density residential areas. The MF-1 District is
appropriate adjacent to both residential and non-residential districts and may serve as a transition
between single-family districts and more intense multi -family or commercial districts. Permitted
uses in this district include, but are not limited to, attached and detached multi -family, group
homes (7-15 residents), and roomingiboarding houses. Other uses such as day care facilities,
churches, neighborhood amenity center and schools, among others are permitted subject to specific
design limitations. Certain land uses, including assisted living, group homes (16+ residents) and
halfway houses, require a Special Use Permit (SUP). Exhibit 4 contains a comprehensive list of MF-1
district permitted uses and development standards. The General Commercial (C-3) zoning district
is intended to provide a location for general commercial and retail activities that serve the entire
community and its visitors. Uses may be large in scale and generate substantial traffic, making the
C-3 District only appropriate along freeways and major arterials.
The applicant addressed the Commission and further explained the request for C3 zoning.
Chair Perthuis opened and closed the Public Hearing as no one signed up to speak.
Motion to recommend approval of the MF-1 and disapproval of the C3 portion of the project by
('1,av T)e, Fl��+ic Q.-A 1ky i.ol_—;ac„ n
L :vner Waken nf;naeene C;-n
\.hll 1 LLllLL1J• LI L.l.V1LL1 • •aVr vaa rwvv...v
BT. Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to
rezone 5.5 acres situated in the Antonio Manchaca Survey, Abstract No. 421, from the General
Commercial (C-3) zoning district to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning district with a
base zoning of General Commercial (C-3), for the property generally located at the southwest
corner of the IH-35 frontage road and CR 143 (2021-9-PUD). Ethan Harwell, Senior Planner & Britin
Bostick, Historic and Downtown Planner
Chair Perthuis recused himself from this item.
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 14 of 16
December 7, 2021
Staff report by Harwell. The applicant is requesting approval of a zoning map amendment to
amend a 5.5-acre tract of undeveloped land at the southwest corner of the intersection of the IH-35
frontage road and CR 143 to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning district to allow for the
uses currently permitted for the General Commercial (C-3) zoning district, plus the use of Major
Event Entertainment. The request also includes sign standards that would allow for the
construction of a flagpole with a maximum height of 410 feet, with a flag area of 140 feet long by 70
feet wide or 9,800 square feet. Additional proposed signs include a large diameter sign encircling
the flagpole constructed of metal panels. The subject property is located at the northernmost tip of
the Georgetown city limits, with the north and east property lines bounded by CR 143 and the IH-
35 frontage road, respectively. The property is presently undeveloped and abuts the Champion Site
Prep property to the west. The subject property is situated along the southbound IH-35 frontage
road and the south side of CR 143. The site lacks distinctive natural features but has a prominent
location as the present north "entrance" to the City of Georgetown and is elevated above IH-35 due
to grading along the interstate right-of-way underneath the CR 143 bridge. The subject property has
an Employment Center Future Land Use designation and is currently zoned General Commercial
(C-3). It is also within the Highway Gateway Overlay District. The subject property was annexed to
the city in 2006 and rezoned from the Agriculture. The proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD)
has a base zoning district of General Commercial (C-3) zoning, which is the current zoning of the
property. The proposed PUD proposes deviations from the UDC standards for permitted uses,
signage, etc.
The applicant, Randy Mongold, addressed the Commission and provided additional information
regarding the project.
Commissioner McCord opened and closed the Public Hearing as no one signed up to speak.
Motion to deny Item BT (2021-9-PUD) by Commissioner Warren. Second by Commissioner
McCord. Motion ties 2-2 with Commissioner Perthuis abstained.
Motion to approve Item BT by Commissioner Haynie. Second by Commissioner Noble. Motion
ties 2-2 with Commissioner Perthuis abstained.
Motion fails and the item will rnnti_nve to City C'nyInril
Chair Perthuis returned to the dais.
Commissioner Noble left the meeting at 8:34pm.
BU. Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to
amend the Summit at Westinghouse PUD which consists of 72 acres within the BC Low Survey,
No 51 and to amend zone A, to remove Townhome (TH) and allow Low Density Multi -family
(MF-1) for property generally located at 500 Westinghouse and currently zoned Planned Unit
Development District (PUD) (2021-6-PUD) — Sofia Nelson, Planning Director
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 15 of 16
December 7, 2021
Staff report by Nelson. In 2017/ 2018 the property owner developed a Planned Unit Development
(PUD) that supported the development of a mixed -use community offering new commercial and
residential opportunities along Mays Street. The adopted PUD established use restrictions within
the proposed General Commercial (C-3) areas, established a maximum number of units, a
minimum commercial acreage and development standards that allowed for vertical mixed use in
addition to the mixture of uses across the proposed development. The PUD adopted a concept
plan for land use and a concept plan for proposed open space and trail connections. The PUD
allowed for a phased development approach while maintaining flexibility in building placement,
open space/trails, and traffic flow. The applicant seeks to amend the PUD to allow for the following
changes: To create a new zone (zone A2) from the existing zone A, rename zone A to zone Al; The
amendment proposes changing this new zone from just Townhome (TH) to Low Density
Multifamily (MF-1) and removing the Towhome zoning option from zone A-1. As part of this
change the applicant will reduce the max acres from 24 acres to approximately 19 acres and from a
max of 250 units to 152 units. The requested change is intended to allow for a townhome-style
development with attached buildings at a maximum of six units per building. The MF-1 zoning is
requested to allow the townhomes to be developed on a shared common lot, rather than individual
lots, with private maintenance of open space and vehicular drives.
The applicant, Matthew Rector, addressed the Commission and was available to answer questions.
Chair Perthuis opened and closed the Public Hearing as no one signed up to speak.
Motion to approve Item BU (2021-6-PUD) by Commissioner Warren. Second by Commissioner
Haynie. Approved 4-0.
BV Discussion Items:
- Updates and Announcements (Sofia Nelson, Planning Director)
- Update from other Board and Commission meetings
- Questions or comments from Alternate Members about the actions and matters considered on
this agenda.
- Reminder of the December 21, 2021, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting in Council
Chambers located at 510 W 9th St, starting at 6:00pm.
Adjournment
Motion to adjourn by Commissioner Warren. Second by Commissioner Haynie. Approved (4-0).
Adjourned at 8:53 p.m.
r t ��/f� ✓ �` � E j �i
T »^ "�t, Chair-; Attest aylah McCord, Secretary
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 16 of 16
December 7, 2021