Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes P&Z 01.07.2020City of Georgetown, Texas Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Tuesday, January 7, 2020 at 6:00 p.m. I R,,l.l,,, rr 1—+-A o+ r.1 n TAT ath C+r + f-­­ Commissioners present: Kaylah McCord; Tim Bargainer, Vice -Chair; Gary Newman; Marlene McMichael; Travis Perthuis Commissioner absent: Ercel Brashear, Chair; Aaron Albright Alternate Commissioner present: Glenn Patterson; Roger Chappell Staff Present: Andreina Davila -Quintero, Current Planning Manager; Sofia Nelson, Planning Director; Chelsea Irby, Senior Planner, Ethan Harwell, Planner; Michael Patroski, Planner; Mirna Garcia, Management Analyst; Steve McKeown, Landscape Planner; David Munk, Utility Engineer; Lua Saluone, Utility Engineer; Britin Bostick, Historic Downtown Planner Vice -Chair Bargainer called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. and Commissioner Newman led the pledge of allegiance. Public Wishing to Address the Board At the time of posting, no persons had signed up to address the Board. Consent Agenda The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non -controversial and routine items that may be acted upon with one single vote. An item may be pulled from the Consent Agenda in order that it be discussed and acted upon individually as part of the Regular Agenda. A. Consideration and possible action to approve the minutes from the December 17, 2019 regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. — Mirna Garcia, Management Analyst B. Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of approximately 30.13 acres in the William Roberts Survey, Abstract No. 524, generally located north of the Bellaire Drive and Rosedale Boulevard intersection, to be known as The Hills at Georgetown Village (PP-2018-005) -- Chelsea Irby, Senior Planner C. Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Preliminary Plat Amendment, consisting of approximately 29.140 acres in the William Roberts Survey, Abstract No. 524, generally located at 1321 Shell Road, to be known as The Arbors at Georgetown Village (2019-15-PP) -- Chelsea Irby, Senior Planner D. Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Replat of a portion of Block 51 of the Revised Map of Snyder Addition and Portions of Blocks 6, 7, and 11, Coffee Addition, consisting of approximately 1.821 acres in the W. Addison Survey, Abstract No. 21, generally located at Pine Street and 18th Street, to be known as Pine Street Villas (2019-40-FP) -- Chelsea Irby, Senior Planner E. Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 10 January 7, 2020 application for a Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 12.08 acres in the Antonio Flores Survey, Abstract No. 235, generally located at 661 FM 971 to be known as Parkside Crossing (2019-74-SDP) -- Chelsea Irby, Senior Planner F. Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Replat of Lot 4, Block A, Salinas Subdivision, being 4,002 acres in the Charles H. Delaney Survey, Abstract No.181, generally located at 10972 RM 2338 to be known as Replat of Lot 4, Block A, Salinas Subdivision (2019-35-FP) -- Ethan Harwell, Planner G. Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for a Final Plat, consisting of approximately 61.674 acres out of the Orville Perry Survey, Abstract No.10, generally located at 544 Wolf Rd to be known as Wolf Ranch West Section 3, Phase 1 (2019-38-FP) -- Michael Patroski, Planner H. Consideration and possible action to disapprove for the reasons set forth in the item an application for an Amended Site Development Plan, consisting of approximately 42.5 acres in the Clements Stubblefield and Ruidosa Irrigation Company Survey, Abstract 207, generally located at1601 Leander Road to be known as Tippit Middle School (2019-79-SDP) -- Michael Patroski, Planner I. Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Stormwater Permit consisting of approximately 45.551 acres in the William Addison Survey, Abstract No. 21, generally located at 2601 Rockride Ln to be known as BB&G Storage (2019-11-SWP) -- David Munk, PE, and Lua Saluone, Utility Engineering Vice -Chair Bargainer requested Consent Agenda Items B and C be moved to the Legislative Regular Agenda. Motion to approve all Consent Agenda items as presented, except for Items B and C, by Commissioner McMichael. Second by Alternate Commissioner Patterson. Approved (7-0). Legislative Regular Agenda B. Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Preliminary Plat, consisting of approximately 30.13 acres in the William Roberts Survey, Abstract No. 524, generally located north of the Bellaire Drive and Rosedale Boulevard intersection, to be known as The Hills at Georgetown Village (PP-2018-005) -- Chelsea Irby, Senior Planner Vice -Chair Bargainer and Commissioner Newman removed themselves from the dais at 6:02pm due to a conflict of interest. Presented by Irby. Commissioner McCord opened and closed the Public Hearing, as no one signed up to speak. Motion to approve Item B (PP-2018-005) as presented by Commissioner McMichael. Second by Commissioner Perthuis. Approved (5-0). Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 10 January 7, 2020 C. Consideration and possible action to approve an application for a Preliminary Plat Amendment, consisting of approximately 29.140 acres in the William Roberts Survey, Abstract No. 524, generally located at 1321 Shell Road, to be known as The Arbors at Georgetown Village (2019-15-PP) -- Chelsea Irby, Senior Planner Vice -Chair Bargainer and Commissioner Newman remained off the dais for this item due to a conflict of interest. Presented by Irby. Commissioner McCord opened and closed Public Hearing, as no one signed up to speak. Motion to approve Agenda Item C (2019-15-PP) as presented by Alternate Commissioner Chappell. Second by Alternate Commissioner Patterson. Approved (5-0). Vice -Chair Bargainer and Commissioner Newman returned to the dais at 6:06pm. J. Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone 17.270 acres out of the Burrell Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 216, from a Planned Unit Development (PUD) with a base district of Residential Single -Family (RS) to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) with a base district of Local Commercial (C-1), for the property generally located at the southwest corner of SH 195 and Sun City Boulevard (2019-2-PUD) -- Ethan Harwell, Planner Harwell stated that the applicant requests items J and K to be moved to the February 18, 2020 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Motion by Commissioner Newman to move Agenda Item J (2019-2-PUD) to the February 18 meeting. Second by Commissioner McCord. Motion approved (5-2), with Commissioner McMichael and Alternate Commissioner Chappell opposed. Vice -Chair Bargainer requested a five-minute recess at 6:10p.m. The Commission resumed at 6:17p.m. K. Public Hearing and possible action on the #12 Amendment to the Sun City Texas Development Agreement, amending the current concept plan specifically for the 17.270 acres located at the southwest corner of SH 195 and Sun City Boulevard (2019-1-DA) -- Seth Gipson, PMP Manager Motion by Commissioner McCord to move Agenda Item K (2019-1-DA) to the February 18 meeting. Second by Commissioner Perthuis. Motion approved (5-2), with Commissioner McMichael and Alternate Commissioner Chappell opposed. L. Continued from the December 17, 2019 meeting: Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone approximately 24.00 acres out of the Antonio Flores Addition Survey, Abstract No. 2356, from the Local Commercial (C-1) district to the High -Density Multi - Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 10 January 7, 2020 Family (MF-2) district, for the property generally located at the northeast corner of the N Austin Ave and Stadium Drive intersection (2019-9-REZ) -- Michael Patroski, Planner Patroski stated that the applicant requests to postpone (pull) the item to a future Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Per staff, there is no need for a motion by the Commission, as there will be a re -notification for this item for the future meeting. M. Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone 88.92 acres out of the David Wright Survey, Abstract No. 13, from the Agriculture (AG) district to the Industrial (IN) district, generally located at 3001 IH 35 (2019-23-REZ) -- Michael Patroski, Planner Staff report presented by Patroski. The applicant is requesting to rezone the Agriculture (AG) zoned property to Industrial (IN). The Letter of Intent indicates that the property will front the proposed Aviation Drive, which will extend from the existing dead end to Interstate 35 (I-35) Southbound frontage road. A Preliminary Plat will be submitted depicting this infrastructure in the near future. The applicant would use the property in a manner compatible with the requested zoning. The subject property is located within the northwest quadrant between Airport and I-35. Within this area there are many undeveloped properties that have been recently developed or entitled for industrial type uses with supporting commercial uses along I-35 or at the intersection of Lakeway and I-35. The subject property is relatively flat, undeveloped land with little to no tree coverage on the property. Vice -Chair Bargainer opened and closed the Public Hearing, as no one signed up to speak. Motion to recommend approval of Item M (2019-23-REZ) as presented by Commissioner McMichael. Second by Alternate Commissioner Chappell. Approved (7-0). N. Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone 53.219 acres out of the Francis A. Hudson Survey, Abstract 295, and James S. Patterson Survey, Abstract No. 502, from the Business Park (BP) (+/-40.242 acres) and Local Commercial (C-1) (+/-15.70 acres) districts to the Industrial (IN) (20.47 acres) and General Commercial (C-3) (32.88 acres) districts, generally located at 1201 Westinghouse Road (2019-24-REZ) -- Michael Patroski, Planner Staff report presented by Patroski. The subject property is part of a larger 70-acre tract that is entitled for Local Commercial and Business Park uses. The applicant is requesting to rezone the Local Commercial (C-1-15.70 acres) and a part of the Business Park (BP-40.242 acres) zoned property to Industrial (IN-20.47 acres) and General Commercial (C-3-32.88 acres). According to the applicants Letter of Intent (Exhibit 5), the owners wish to develop a combination of commercial, business park and industrial uses on the subject property. The applicant also plans to extend Blue Ridge Parkway to provide connectivity throughout the property. As displayed in the proposed concept plan, the General Commercial (C-3) development will be along Westinghouse Road with the Industrial (IN) development located to the north, set back from the major roadway. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 10 January 7, 2020 Additionally, the remaining 16.73 acres of Business Park (BP -no proposed change) will assist in the transition from Residential development to the east to more intense development to the west. David Singleton, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and provided a brief history of the tract. He discussed a regional wastewater interceptor that was constructed a couple years ago. This pry is consistent with�t efuture anuse map. The Commission -i-a no questions for the applicant. Vice -Chair Bargainer opened the Public Hearing. Catherine Smith objects to the zoning change. She commented that the proposed area for zoning change is too close to her home for industrial use. There is already a lot of noise in the neighborhood, as there is also a park a lot of people use. She is concerned with the increase in noise and traffic. Vice -Chair Bargainer had a question about the green area the Mrs. Smith referred to. Patroski commented that it is the Rabbit Hill park. Vice -Chair Bargainer closed the Public Hearing. Commissioner Newman had a question about an area on a map presented. Patroski explained that area is in the ETJ. Commissioner McMichael asked the applicant about what the proposed use will be. The applicant explained that it is currently business park use, but there is nothing specific at this time for the use. Motion to recommend approval of Item N (2019-24-REZ) as presented by Commissioner McCord. Second by Alternate Commissioner Chappell. Approved (7-0). O. Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone approximately 18.54 acres out of the Antonio Manchaca Survey, Abstract No. 421, from the Agriculture (AG) district to the Industrial (IN) (13 acres) and General Commercial (C-3) (5.5 acres) districts, generally located at 6301 N IH 35 (2019-25-REZ) -- Michael Patroski, Planner Staff report presented by Patroski. The applicant requests to rezone the subject property from Agriculture (AG) to Industrial (IN-13 acres) and General Commercial (C-3-5.5 acres). According to the applicant's Letter of Intent (Exhibit 5), the Industrial (IN) section of the property will be used as an office, parking and for storing fuel and equipment. The use of the C-3 section of the property is for uses allowed in this district. The subject property is located southwest of the CR 143 and N IH- 35 intersection. The subject property is located in an underdeveloped section of the city. The subject property is vacant, predominately flat, and has minimal tree coverage throughout the site. Vice -Chair Bargainer opened and closed the Public Hearing as no one signed up to speak. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 10 January 7, 2020 Motion to recommend approval of Item O (2019-25-REZ) as presented by Alternate Commissioner Patterson. Second by Commissioner McMichael. Approved (7-0). P. Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone Lots 1, 2 and 3 of the Southworth Addition from the Industrial (IN) district to the General Commercial (C-3) district, generally located at 2301 Old Airport Road (2019-17-REZ) -- Chelsea Irby, Senior Planner Staff report presented by Irby. The subject property is currently developed with a daycare facility. The applicant is requesting a zoning change to allow the existing use to expand, which is not allowed in the current Industrial (IN) zoning district. See Exhibit 5 for the applicant's letter of intent. The subject property is located on Old Airport Road, between IH-35 and N Austin Avenue. The surrounding area between Old Airport Road and N Austin Avenue is an older area that was intended for industrial uses when it was rezoned in 1993. Since that time, the area has been primarily used as commercial, particularly as storage and auto -related uses. There is daycare, office, retail, contractor uses, and the Georgetown High School. There is also a single-family home south of the subject property. In 2012, the property to the southeast of the subject property was rezoned to General Commercial (C-3) to provide for additional commercial opportunities. Vice -Chair Bargainer opened and closed the Public Hearing as no one signed up to speak. Motion to recommend approval of Item P (2019-17-REZ) as presented by Commissioner Newman. Second by Alternate Commissioner Chappell. Approved (7-0). Q. Public Hearing and possible action on a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone 4.137 acres in the f . Berry Survey, Abstract No. 51, from the Agriculture (AG) district to the Industrial (IN) district, for the property generally located at 401 SH 130 (2019-20-REZ) -- Ethan Harwell, Planner Staff report presented by Harwell. The applicant wishes to rezone the subject property to Industrial (IN). The applicant's letter of intent (Exhibit 5) describes their intent to develop the subject property as an office and warehouse for a contractor services use. The developed site would include indoor and outdoor storage of materials associated with the business and not for retail sale. The subject property is located along SH 130 approximately 1,200 feet south of its junction with IH-35. The property generally sits between the highway and Berry Springs Park, further the east. The property was previously used as a residence, but the house has recently been removed. The area surrounding the subject property is largely undeveloped. The only other development near the subject property is an abandoned RV park to the north. Further south along SH 130 you can find some light industrial uses near CR 152. Due east of this property sits the Berry Springs Park and Preserve (a Williamson County park). The applicant, David Platt, addressed the Commission and commented that this will an office warehouse for an electrical contracting company. They originally wanted to apply for business park zoning but the size of the lot is too small for that type of zoning. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 10 January 7, 2020 Vice -Chair Bargainer opened and closed the Public Hearing, as no one signed up to speak. Motion to recommend approval of Item Q (2019-20-REZ) as presented by Commissioner McMichael. Second by Alternate Commissioner Chappell. Approved (7-0). R. Public Hearing and possible action on a request for atoning -Map Amen ment to rezone 0-43- acres being a part of Lot 4, Block B, Horizon Commercial Park, from the Industrial (IN) district to the General Commercial_ (C-3) district, generally located at 605 High Tech Dr (2019-22-REZ) -- Chelsea Irby, Senior Planner Alternate Commissioner Patterson removed himself from the dais at 7:02p.m. Staff report presented by Irby. The applicant is requesting to rezone the property to General Commercial (C-3) for development. The applicant's letter of intent can be found in Exhibit 5. The subject property is located at the northwest corner of High Tech Drive and FM 1460. The subject property has an existing Future Land Use designation of Mixed Use Neighborhood Commercial and is currently zoned Industrial (IN) and Scenic/Natural Gateway Overlay. The area surrounding the subject property is diverse in zoning and land uses. In the immediate vicinity there is a variety of different residential and office uses. Much of the property in the vicinity is undeveloped and poised to either develop with a residential or commercial use due to the Future Land Use designation, proximity to FM 1460 (a major arterial) and SE Inner Loop (future freeway), and existing development pattern. The property to the northeast at the southeast corner of FM 1460 and High Tech Drive was rezoned to General Commercial (C-3) in March 2019 to allow the property to develop with commercial uses. The area west the subject property has seen some development in recent years with the realignment of FM 1460, like Old Mill Crossing at the end of High Tech Drive. The area near the corner of High Tech Drive and FM 1460 is a mix of multi -family, office, and undeveloped land. Vice -Chair Bargainer opened the Public Hearing. Robert Smith, public speaker, commented that he does not object to the zoning change. However, he is concerned with what will be built there, as he has heard that a convenience store will be built. Vice -Chair Bargainer closed the Public Hearing and invited the applicant to address the Commission. The applicant, Samir Desai, addressed the Commission and stated that there are no plans for a convenience store. There is no plan yet for the use. Motion to recommend approval of Item R (2019-22-REZ) as presented by Alternate Commissioner Chappell. Second by Commissioner Newman. Approved (6-0). Alternate Commissioner Patterson returned to the dais at 7:16p.m. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 10 January 7, 2020 S. Public Hearing and possible action on a Unified Development Code (UDC) Text Amendment for proposed amendments to Chapter 5, Zoning Use Regulations, and Chapter 16, Definitions, of the Unified Development Code relative to certain uses in specific zoning districts (Amendment No.12 and 13) -- Chelsea Irby, Senior Planner Staff report presented by Irby. In April 24, 2018, the City Council directed staff to update the UDC's zoning use regulations as a part of the 2018/19 UDC Annual Review process (Amendment No.12 and 13). The purpose of this amendment is to review specific uses for each zoning district to see where they may be permitted by right, permitted with limitations, permitted with approval of a special use permit, or not allowed. On May 8, June 12, September 11, and October 9, 2019, the UDCAC discussed specific uses that have presented challenges because they were not included in the Permitted Use Table or are only permitted in one or two zoning districts. The specific uses identified for consideration included: Office/Showroom; Towing Services and Impound Lots; Storage yards; Contractor services (limited and general); and Office/Warehouse. These are uses that are typically allowed in the Industrial (IN) zoning district due to the large amount of storage, particularly outdoor storage, of materials, equipment and vehicles that may be associated with the use. However, these are uses that may also be accommodated in lesser intense zoning districts, such as General Commercial (C-3) and Business Park (BP), as these are zoning districts that are typically located along major thoroughfares, allow other supporting uses, or are intended to provide a location for large developments. At their December 4, 2019 meeting, the UDC Advisory Committee recommended approval (5-0) of the request with the following modifications: Where stated "..existing single-family home in the ETJ that is platted or planned for residential use on the Future Land Use Map", replace the work "planned" to "designated"; and Add an additional limitation to the Office/Warehouse specific use to limit access to loading and storage areas to the side or rear of the building. Vice -Chair Bargainer opened and closed the Public Hearing, as no one signed up to speak. Motion to recommend approval of Item S by Commissioner McCord. Second by Commissioner Perthuis. Revised motion to recommend approval of Item S with the UDCAC's additional recommendations and modifications by Commissioner McCord. Second by Commissioner Perthuis. Approved (7-0). T. Public Hearing and possible action on a Unified Development Code (UDC) Text Amendment on proposed amendments to Chapter 3, Applications and Permits, relative to zoning variances for sign area (Amendment No. 18) -- Andreina Davila -Quintero, AICP, Current Planning Manager As part of the annual review process the City Council directed staff to update the UDC's sign variance process. The current UDC provides a process to seek relief from the sign height and location standards through the Zoning Variance process, but not the sign area provisions of the UDC. Zoning Variances, as well as Special Exceptions, are considered by the Zoning Board of Adjustment following the public hearing process. The purpose of this amendment is to provide for Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 8 of 10 January 7, 2020 a process to seek relief from the sign area and other applicable standards that, when strictly applied, the sign standards prohibits reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signage. In addition, the proposed amendment clarifies that a request for a Zoning Variance (or Special Exception) must be placed on the agenda of the next available regular scheduled meeting after the application is filed. While there is no state law provision for when the public hearing must occur, the City's UDC requires the Zoning Board of Adjustment to hold a public hearing withm 45 ctays following the filing of an application. Historically, the City has been able to meet this requirement. However, as the Zoning Board of Adjustment only meets once a month there have been special situations where this provision was not met as the Applicant worked with City staff to explore alternative solutions to better meet their needs while meeting the spirit and intent of the UDC. With the establishment of a set of Application Submittal dates, public hearings may be scheduled within 45 to 50 days of the filing of an application. Proposed Amendments: Utilizing the existing process and provisions for zoning and sign variances currently permitted by the UDC the proposed amendments are drafted to require the following: Authority: The Zoning Board of Adjustment is the body that would consider and take action on all sign variances. Criteria for Approval: A variance shall not be approved unless it meets the following criteria for approval: The request is not contrary to the public interest; Due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the requirements would result in unnecessary hardship; The spirit of the Code is preserved, and substantial justice is done. Notice and Hearing: Requires the public hearing to be scheduled at the next available regular scheduled meeting. Commissioner Newman had a question about the insufficient findings. Davila -Quintero explained that included financial hardship (variance not sought because it is too expensive to meet code); highest and best use of the property (property cannot be used), and self-created hardship and that the property owner will not be frustrated (variance was not a result of the property owner's action). If the variance sought is due to any of these reasons, the Board may not use them to grant the variance. Vice -Chair Bargainer opened and closed the Public Hearing, as no one signed up to speak. Motion to recommend approval of Item T as presented by Commissioner McMichael. Second by Alternate Commissioner Chappell. Approved (7-0). U. Presentation and Discussion on training opportunities in 2020. Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director This item is intended to discuss and seek the commission's feedback on possible training presentations the commission would like to have in 2020. Please bring your ideas on topics. The intent of this item is get feedback so that within the next month we can bring to you a training plan for the year. Commissioner Perthuis commented that the information related to the presentations prepared in the agenda packet is very helpful when reviewing prior to the meeting. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 7, 2020 Page 9 of 10 V. Discussion Items: a. Updates and Announcements — Sofia Nelson, CNU-A, Planning Director Nelson reminded the Commissioners of re -applying for the Commission if they are interested. Nelson also discussed a shot clock survey that was sent to all applicants that have submitted an application so far. When results have been gathered, those will be shared with the Commission for additional input regarding the review process. b. Update from other Board and Commission meetings i. GTAB ii. UDCAC c. Questions of comments from Alternate Members about the actions and matters considered on this agenda d. Reminder of the January 21, 2020, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting in CC Chambers located at 510 W 91h St., starting at 6:00pm. Motion to adjourn by Alternate Commissioner Chappell. Second by Alternate Commissioner Patterson. Approved (7-0). Adjournment at 7:51 P.M. Ercel Brashear, Chair Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 7, 2020 Attest, P&Z Travis Perthuis, Secretary Page 10 of 10