HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 02.28.2006 CC-RMinutes of the Meetingof the Governing
of the City of Georgetown, Texas
Tuesday, February 28, 2006
The City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, met in Regular Session on the above date with Mayor
Gary Nelon presiding.
Council Present: Council Absent:
Patty Eason, Gabe Sansing, Doug Smith, Henry ;All Council present
i Carr, John Kirby, Farley Snell, Ben Oliver
Staff Present:
Paul Brandenburg, City Manager; Tom Yantis, Assistant City Manager; Jim Briggs, Assistant City
Manager for Utility Operations; Patricia Carls, City Attorney; Sandra Lee, City Secretary; Micki Rundell,
Director of Finance and Administration; David Morgan, Police Chief; Bobby Ray, Director of Development':;
Services; Ed Polasek, Chief Long -Range Planner; Keith Hutchinson, Public Information Officer
n utes
Mayor Pro Tem Doug Smith opened the Workshop at 5:00 p.m.
A Discussion and possible direction to staff regarding Del Webb Development Agreement
Brandenburg discussed Amendment No. 8 of the Del Webb Development Agreement, which he said
increases the total units from 5000 to 7500. He said the previous amendment had approved a buffer strip
that separated connectivity, and that is now being taken away, which will be a substantial change, so the
Concept Plan will need to be included in 8th amendment, along with the method of how Del Webb plans to
develop. He said this time there will be units with zero lot lines (detached cottages), saying 800 of the 2500
will be zero lot line and cluster homes (garden homes). He said the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is being
reviewed and will soon be completed in time for next week's Planning and Zoning Meeting. He said the
number of connectivity points is an issue as to whether there would be three or four. He said there is also
the service issue, such as public safety and utilities and whether to build two or three new fire stations. He
said the City hasn't identified where the land is available for the new stations, and there would be a large
cost for construction and ongoing operations, not including vehicles and other apparatus. He said state law
does not allow impact fees for fire stations.
Carr asked and Brandenburg responded regarding the difference between the TIA being done by the City's
consultant, Wilbur Smith, or by the developer. Carr said he wished to make a statement to his constituents,
saying his position is that there needs to be a study, and if the results of the study say three or four, then if
borderline, talk about it. He said he will look at what is right for that community in 2015. He said if a 4th
entrance is needed, it will have to be done by the developer within the plan that is approved now. He said
he has not decided yet and plans to look at the data. Smith asked if it were possible to have two small fire
stations as opposed to one large one. Brandenburg said there are options to be considered. Snell asked
and Brandenburg responded that the study is definitely addressing the accessibility for fire and police.
When an inquiry was made by a member of the audience, it was determined that this issue was not posted
for audience response. Brandenburg said the Council will see this issue again, at which time, citizen input
would be welcome.
City Council Meeting Minutes/February 28, 2006
Page 1 of 7 Pages
Brandenburg explained the Service Improvement Program (SIP) fee that is currently included in the
Development Agreement. He noted that Del Webb will be paying the balance of the stranded costs
(approximately $2.1 million) to the City. He said whether to annex needs to be a policy decision made by
the Council. He said the infrastructure has already been sized to support development. He reviewed the
schedule regarding when this item will come before the Council. He noted that there have been
approximately eight to twelve City employees who have been working on this issue and most are available
in the audience for questions from the Council.
It was asked as to whether this development falls under the old regulations or the new Unified Development
Code. Carls said according to the 7th amendment and now the 8th amendment as proposed, the
development would continue under the original regulations. Snell confirmed that the northern lands would
not be considered under the original agreement. He asked staff to consider whether the City "does better"
under the old agreement or under the new agreement. Smith asked and Brandenburg responded that the
issues still to be worked out with Del Webb are the TIA connectivity and public safety.
Motion by Eason, second by Snell to direct staff to look into making this development non -age -restricted.
Carr asked if staff could explain the consequences regarding this. Brandenburg said the staff would need
to take a look at it and bring that information back to Council at the next discussion. Sansing said he thinks
it is a mistake to change things. Carr asked if a change like that would mean changing the original
agreement. Carls said staff looked at the development concerning utilities in the beginning and a change to
non -age -restricted would have a major impact. Oliver asked and Brandenburg answered that if the 8th
Amendment were not approved, and the development ended at 5000 units, there would probably be legal
challenge. He noted that there needs to be legal research done in order to respond. There were further
comments from Council.
Carr asked that the proponents of the motion on the floor speak about why this would be a good thing to do.
Eason said because of Proposition 13, and because of needing to entice businees and industry here, and
needing to recruit more families with children. She said the City needs to diversity and is being penalized
by the low tax rate which is a problem in the feasibility study for the future transit oriented development for
the proposed commuter rail station. She said a lot of changes have occurred that have segregated the
populations of the City. There was further discussion. Carr asked for the appraised value of the area of
the City that is beng talked about and the total amount of taxes that are paid from there each year, as well
as the votes that came from that area to support the Library, Recreation Center, and Community Center.
Smith said he feels retirees bring money earned elsewhere into the City and therefore are economic
development for the City, and he said he thinks that is the most positive reason to attract retired folks.
Eason said there is a need to recruit people who will live here and work in the businesses and industries.
She said she is not saying "don't invite" the retirees, just don't designate a place for them to live. She said
there needs to be a balance so there is a diverse tax base and diverse population to work in the industries
that the retired people are paying for. Oliver said he thinks this motion sends the wrong message to the
staff. Kirby agreed with Oliver, but said an objective look is needed.
Mayor Pro Tem Smith called the question: Vote on the motion: Denied 5-2. (Oliver, Sansing, Kirby, Carr,
and Smith opposed). Motion by Snell, second by Oliver that staff be directed to present to Council,
sometime prior to final approval of the agreement, a comparison of the zero lot lines and cluster units
against what would have been allowed in the 7th Amendment in regards to property tax, etc. Brandenburg
said the Council would see the 8th Amendment, the Traffic Impact Analysis, the financial analysis, and
information regarding economics. Approved 7-0. Oliver confirmed that the financial arrangement is
covered in the amendment, but asked how many more units could be developed. Del Webb General
Manager, Gary Newman, from the audience, said under the 7th amendment, he has a right to 10,500 units
and has lowered to 7,500. He said the rest of the land is open for development by others. (Sansing left the
dais at 6:00 p.m.) Council generally agreed that there needs to be another time to spend in workshop on
this agreement.
Regular Session to convene and continue Executive Session, if necessary
In compliance with the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Government Code, Vernon's Texas Codes,
Annotated, the items listed below will be discussed in closed session and are subject to action in the
regular session that follows.
B Sec.551.071: Consultation with Attorney
- Advice from attorney about pending or contemplated litigation and other matters on which the attorney has a duty to
advise the City Council, including agenda items
- Discussion and possible action regarding the audit of the franchise agreement with Cox Communications, Inc. and
City Council Meeting Minutes/February 28, 2006
Page 2 of 7 Pages
regarding the possible assignment to Cequel III (Cebridge Connections).
- Henderson v. City of Georgetown and Bishop Gregory Aymond for the Dioceses of Austin , Cause No. A06CA082 SS;
United States District Court, Western District of Texas
Regular Session m To begin no earlier than 06:00 PM
(Council may, at any time, recess the Regular Session to convene an Executive Session at the request of
the Mayor, a Councilmember, or the City Manager for any purpose authorized by the Open Meetings Act,
Texas Government Code Chapter 551.)
C Call to Order
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Nelon at 6:10 p.m.
D Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Nelon led the Pledge.
Mayor Nelon announced the unexpected death today of County Commissioner Tom McDaniel. He
issued thoughts and prayers to his wife and family.
E Comments from the dais
- Welcome to Audience and Opening Comments -- Mayor Gary Nelon
- Review of procedure for addressing the City Council
Mayor Nelon gave a brief outline of the meeting procedures.
F Announcements and Comments from City Manager
Brandenburg had no announcements.
G Public Wishing to Address Council
- Sandra Taylor from Pedernales Electric (PEC) regarding an update on the Cooperative's activities in the Georgetown
area.
Taylor said PEC supports civic and charitable associations throughout the area. She noted the
availability of on-line eletric bill paying at www.pec.coop/accounts. She said there are new payment
options, a meter monitoring program, and small rate increases.
H Action from Executive Session
There was no action from Executive Session.
Statutory Consent Agenda
The Statutory Consent Agenda includes non -controversial and routine items that Council may act on with
one single vote. A councilmember may pull any item from the Consent Agenda in order that the council
discuss and act upon it individually as part of the Regular Agenda.
Mayor Nelon noted that the agenda item approving the previous minutes is the last item on this agenda, so he
moved it forward to be considered on the Consent Agenda. He also acknowledged that Council had been made
aware, with a memo on the dais, of a correction made prior to the meeting.
CC Consideration and possible
action to
approve the
minutes
of the Council Workshop on Monday, February
13,
and
the regular
Council
Meeting
on
Tuesday,
February
14, 2006 -- Sandra
D.
Lee,
City
Secretary
Consideration and possible action to approve a contract amendment between the City of Georgetown and
Kasberg, Patrick and Associates, L.L.P. for professional services related to the design of the West Loop
Water Line Improvements for $24,800.00. Glenn Dishong, Water Services Manager; Jim Briggs, Assistant
City Manger for Utility Operations
J Consideration and possible
action to authorize staff
to prepare one or more
entries for the 2006 Envision
Central Texas Community
Stewardship Awards -- Tom Yantis, Assistant
City Manager
K Consideration and possible action to declare seven (7) used reclosures as surplus and authorization for
staff to sell to the City of Weimar for an estimated revenue of $10,500 -- Marsha Iwers, Acting Purchasing
Director and Micki Rundell, Director of Finance and Administration
City Council Meeting Minutes/February 28, 2006
Page 3 of 7 Pages
L Consideration and possible action to approve an award of bid for a forklift to Equipment Depot of
Pflugerville in the amount of $44,713.00 -- Marsha Iwers, Acting Purchasing Director and Micki Rundell,
Director of Finance and Administration
M Consideration and possible action to authorize staff to utilize $9,948 in seized funds to supplement the
purchase of an in-house TLETS (Texas Law Enforcement Teletype System) from BioKey-- Dennis
Schoenborn, Information Technology Director and David Morgan, Police Chief
Eason asked and Morgan responded that BioKey is located in Massachusetts.
Oliver asked and Rundell reported there is a approximately $30,000 in the seized funds account.
N Consideration and possible action to accept the independent audit of all accounts of the City reported in
the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and the single audit report for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2005 -- Laurie Brewer, Controller and Micki Rundell, Director of Finance & Administration
O Consideration and possible action to approve a resolution regarding the proposed interim 2006 Budget
for the Georgetown Economic Development Corporation (GEDCO) -- Micki Rundell, Director of Finance and
Administration
P Consideration and possible action to approve the use of Express Personnel Services for temporary
administrative labor in the amount of $37,500 -- Laurie Brewer, Controller and Micki Rundell, Director of
Finance & Administration
Q Consideration and possible action to approve a resolution regarding the number of directors and officers of
the Georgetown Health Facilities Development Corporation -- Mayor Gary Nelon
R Consideration and possible action to approve a resolution approving a bond resolution by the Georgetown
Health Facilities Development Corporation (GHFDC) providing for the issuance of Bonds for Wesleyan
Homes, Inc. -- Micki Rundell, Director Finance & Administration
S Consideration and possible action to approve a 30 -day lease in the amount of $2,000 with WestStar
Properties for a warehouse facility to house City of Georgetown computers -- Dennis Schoenborn,
Information Technology Director; and Tom Yantis, Assistant City Manager
Motion Sensing, second by Kirby to approve the Consent Agenda with the correction to minutes. Approved 7-0.
Council will individually consider and possibly take action on any or all of the following items:
T Presentation and summary of 2005 Racial Profiling Report as mandated by the State Legislature -- David
Morgan, Chief of Police
Morgan said the report contains police contact data and comprehensive information above and beyond the
minimum state requirements. He said this report gives the City the ability to evaluate performance. He
noted that there have been no complaints received about racial profiling.
U Consideration and possible action to approve a resolution of support for an application for Low Income
Housing Tax Credits and a predevelopment loan for DDC Bluffs Landing, LTD for a proposed multi -family
affordable housing project near the intersection of CR 151 and N. Austin Ave. -- Tom Yantis, Assistant City
Manager
This item was pulled by the applicant.
V Discussion and possible action regarding plans for implementation of certain recommendations from the
Austin Avenue Report prepared by TND Engineering and accepted by Council on November 8, 2005 --
Tom Yantis, Assistant City Manager
Yantis explained the item, saying Council had directed that staff prepare recommendations on how to
implement certain of the recommendations from the Austin Avenue Report. He said some
recommendations were struck at the November 22 Council Meeting, so financing was not pursued for those
City Council Meeting Minutes/February 28, 2006
Page 4 of 7 Pages
recommendations. Yantis said staff is proposing the following: sidewalks and streetscape elements - on
west side of Austin Ave. using TIF funds; burying overhead utilities - with existing funds in Electric Utility
Fund at time of TXDOT work; signal lights - install conduit with TXDOT work and budget for signals in future
fiscal year or use TIF funds; and gateway element at the bridge - budget in future fiscal year as part of the
ongoing gateway signage program. He noted that the River Place Development is under construction now,
so the City will coordinate the projects. Motion by Sansing, second by Snell to approve the item, but with
the removal of the gateway element at the bridge to be included in the 2006-07 budget. Eason questioned
the removal. Yantis described it as a secondary gateway element to describe the downtown. Motion by
Snell, second by Oliver to add the gateway item back into the proposed projects. Sansing explained that, in
his previous motion, he was trying to accomodate the wording on the agenda item cover sheet that said
there was not enough funding in this current budget for the gateway element at the bridge, so Oliver and
Snell withdrew their motion and second. Smith said he thinks the gateway signs are needed quickly and
would like to see funds in the current budget for those signs. Motion by Smith, second by Eason to-ameRd
* to put the gateway element back into the 2006-07 budget. Vote on Motion as amended: Approved 7-0.
(*as corrected by Snell at the March 14, 2006 Council Meeting.)
W Consideration and possible action to authorize First Southwest Company to proceed with the preparation of
the required bond offering documents for the upcoming 2006 bond issues -- Micki Rundell, Director of
Finance and Administration
Rundell explained the item and read the caption of the resolution. Motion by Carr, second by Oliver to
approve. Approved 7-0.
X Consideration
and possible action to give staff
direction
on
the 2006 Annexation Priorities -- Bobby Ray,
AICP,
Director
Planning
and
Development
and
Edward
G.
Polasek,
AICP,
Chief
Long Range
Planner
Polasek explained the item, saying staff has carried forward the Council criteria for annexation. He said
there are 50 designated areas and staff is proposing 26 of those areas for 2006. He said the total that can
be annexed is 6,500 acres, and they have proposed 7,500 acres.
Speaker, Glen Buie, said in 1974 he purchased his ranch of approximately 400 acres. He said he has
maintained a working ranch for over 30 years, with livestock, and growing and selling hay. He said he has
his own water wells, septic tanks, and Pedernales Electric Service. He said there is a considerable amount
of water under the ranch and he thinks the City might be interested in that. He has proposed a
development agreement for voluntary annexation, and in return is asking that his homestead tract of nine
acres not be annexed.
Motion by Carr, second by Snell to direct staff to take all the green -colored areas on the map designated
as 2006 tracts and add the maroon -colored tracts to produce at least 1000 acres of overage and combine
that together with financial impacts so that next time it comes back to Council, the tracts have a
recommended numbered priority. Snell asked if staff needs more help from the Council at this point.
Brandenburg said they could bring back "rank" order and let the Council make the final decision. Oliver
said he thinks the issue of SH130 is getting to be the q6liGkest impertaRG9 *most important issue because
SH130 opens in November. Friendly amendment by Oliver, second by Smith to amend that the SH130
corridor be a moderately high priority. Smith said that area is absolutely essential. Sansing said the infill
tracts throughout the city would be the lowest priority. Kirby said that he knows of other ways to control land
other than mandatory annexation. He said he would like to see the City encourage voluntary annexations
and do agreements with the landowners so that they will agree to voluntary or deferred annexations.
Motion by Kirby, second by Sansing to amend to direct staff to use the priorities and add negotiation of
landowner agreements. Snell said he is against negotiating with individual landowners. He said he thinks
there should be a standardized set of items that would be available to anyone who entered into voluntary
annexation. He said he doesn't want to get into multiple negotiations. There was further discussion. Carts
clarified that the agreements are to forebear from annexing in exchange for obtaining certain things, such
as land control. She said the City would not necessarily receive property taxes, etc. She said Mr. Buie's
agreement is for the City to forebear from annexing his household and the adjoining nine acres. She said
there may be areas where the Council decides it would not be necessary to annex, but there would be the
need to acquire certain control. Nelon clarified that Kirby's amendment is to allow those kind of
agreements. Smith and Carr said they will vote against the amendment because it is confusing the issue.
Vote on the Kirby amendment: denied 5-2. (Eason, Smith, Carr, Snell and Oliver opposed) Motion by
Eason, second by Sansing to amend to add commuter rail as a priority for annexation. Oliver asked the
timeframe for the commuter rail, and Polasek said the area needs to be annexed in order to create the TIF
for the transit oriented development. Vote on the Eason amendment: Approved 7-0. Motion by Snell,
City Council Meeting Minutes/February 28, 2006
Page 5 of 7 Pages
second by
Eason, as a second
level priority, that the
carry-overs from last year be included. There was
further discussion. Approved
5-2. (Kirby and Oliver
opposed)
Vote on the original Motion as amended:
Approved
7-0. (*as corrected
by Oliver at the March
14, 2006
Council Meeting.)
Y Second Readings
1. Second Reading of an ordinance to amend Chapter 15.40 of the Code of Ordinances relating to
Dangerous Buildings to address requirements in the law regarding notice to property owners -- Dave
Hall, Director of Inspection Services
Yantis read only the caption on second reading. Motion by Sansing, second by Carr to approve
Ordinance 2006-14. Approved 7-0.
2. Second Reading of an Ordinance Annexing into the City 13.95 acres, more or less, in the Lewis J.
Dyches Survey, to be known as Pleasant Valley, Section Two -- Bobby Ray, AICP, Director Planning
and Development and Edward G. Polasek, AICP, Chief Long Range Planner
Polasek read only the caption on second reading. Motion by Sansing, second by Eason to approve
Ordinance 2006-15. Approved 7-0.
Z Public Hearings/First Readings
1. First Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Georgetown, Texas, amending
Ordinance No. 2005-95 to remove Section 5 of Ordinance No. 2005-95 relating to the annexation of
approximately 59 Acres (+/-) of land owned by Milton G. and Elizabeth Liese out of the D. Wright
Survey, Abstract No. 13 -- Councilmember Ben Oliver
Carls explained that Council directed this ordinance to be created, and read only the caption of the
ordinance after having satisfied the requirements of the City Charter. Motion by Oliver, second by
Snell to approve the ordinance on first reading. Sansing expressed opposition, not to removing Section
5, but because an agreement had been proposed to the Lieses and now that has been taken away.
Approved 5-2. (Kirby and Sansing opposed)
2. Public Hearing to Consider Rezoning 22.3 acres known as Lot 1, Block A of the Southfork
Apartments Subdivision from RS, Residential Single -Family to C-3, General Commercial located
west of southbound IH -35 and north of Leander Road (2243) -- Bobby Ray, Director of Planning and
Development Services
Ray explained the item, saying the property owners are seeking participation from the Georgetown
Transportation Enhancement Corporation (GTEC) on removing the waterline and constructing a
driveway. He said staff recommends denial of the rezoning and suggests that the applicant pursue a
Planned Unit Development. He said staff expressed concerns with the use of a "blanket" underlying
zoning district of C-3, General Commercial, based on the property's size, it's prominence off of IH -35,
location adjacent to a single-family neighborhood, and location across from the Wolf Ranch Shopping
Center. He said staff would support C-1 zoning with a development agreement, which would give the
City the opportunity to impose conditions to acquire parkland and conditions to protect the adjacent
neighborhood. He said it would be difficult to avoid contractual zoning without being able to be specific
to a certain project in the development agreement. He said the Planning and Zoning Commission
denied C-3 zoning, and entered a motion to recommend C-1 zoning with a development agreement
and site plan, but the motion failed by a 3-4 vote. He noted that Council could suggest deferred action.
Nelon said, according to the Charter, because of the two denials by the Planning and Zoning
Commission, it will require a 3/4 vote of the Council (6 votes) to overturn the Commission's action.
The Public Hearing was opened at 7:08 p.m.
Speaker, James Bryan, distributed an aerial photo of the area and called attention to the topographical
notations showing waterflow, saying there are two or three lots where the houses have been affected
with water moving under the foundations. He asked that the developer not remove any vegetation or
add concrete to the area on the edge of the ravine and asked that it be left as natural as possible.
Speaker, Bruce Barton, representing the owner, said he had just learned that the development
agreement is not going to work and he will come back and do C-1 zoning or determine another path.
He said if the C-1 zoning is not approved, solving the dangerous issues through GTEC probably won't
happen.
City Council Meeting Minutes/February 28, 2006
Page 6 of 7 Pages
Speaker, Johnny Anderson, Chair of the Planning and Zoning Commission, said the Commission voted
differently than the staff recommendation, because they felt there should be a Planned Unit
Development to control the uses, design, and layout of the property.
Carls asked that there be a motion and vote at the next item, the first reading of an ordinance,
regarding the applicant's request for C-3.
The public hearing was closed at 7:25 p.m.
3. First Reading of an Ordinance Rezoning 22.3 acres known as Lot 1, Block A of the Southfork
Apartments Subdivision from RS, Residential Single -Family to C-3, General Commercial located
west of southbound IH -35 and north of Leander Road (2243) -- Bobby Ray, Director of Planning and
Development Services
Ray read the caption only of the ordinance on first reading after having satisfied the requirements of
the City Charter. Motion by Smith, second by Kirby to deny the C-3 zoning. Carr said the GTEC
Board had encouraged the applicant to get a certain zoning. He said he thought the GTEC Board said
the project was not ready for GTEC money and told the applicant to go work with the staff. Vote on
the motion: Approved 7-0.
Snell confirmed that Wolf Ranch is a Planned Unit Development. He said one of the major reasons he
voted for Wolf Ranch was its location. He said this site is almost as important, and said he wants to
know what it's going to look like. Sansing noted that this applicant is also one of the developers of the
Rivery Project.
AA Discussion and possible action to appoint members to the Animal Services Task Force - Paul E.
Brandenburg, City Manager
Brandenburg said he has reviewed the applicants, and he listed the proposed members: David Dunn,
Jessie Yakesch, Debbie Frase, Michelle Williams, Marvin Korn, Amanda Dennis, and Gina Benner.
Motion by Smith, second by Carr to approve the appointments. Approved 7-0
BB Consideration and possible action to approve the appointment of five representatives to a Council
Compensation Committee to review and determine the amount of monthly compensation provided to the
Mayor and Councilmembers -- Mayor Gary Nelon
Nelon explained the item. Motion by Oliver, second by Sansing to approve the procedure to draw five
names from the eight recommended names. Approved 7-0. The following five names were drawn: Emily
Northrop, Deke Davidson, Bryant Boyd, Paulette Taylor, and Tom Nichols
CC Consideration and
possible
action to
approve the
minutes
of the Council Workshop on Monday, February
13,
and the
regular
Council
Meeting
on
Tuesday,
February
14,
2006 -- Sandra
D.
Lee,
City
Secretary
This item was pulled forward to the Consent Agenda.
7:33 p.m. -- adjourned
City Council Meeting Minutes/February 28, 2006
Page 7 of 7 Pages
Attest '4'41
ity Secretary Sandra Lee
Agenda Item No
STATE OF TEXAS )
CONFLICT OF INTEREST AFFIDAVIT
COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON )
reside at `l<20z?�
. _
am a member of the Lear.) 61 t' (City Council or name of City board,
committee or commission)of the City of Georgetown, and I hereby make this affidavit and on my oath state the following:
"I, and/or a person or business entity whose interest is imputed to me under Chapter 171 of the Local Government Code and/or
Chapter 2.20 of the City of Georgetown Code of Ordinances, have a "substantial interest" in a business entity or in real property (as
defined by Chapter 171 of the Texas Local Government Code and Sec. 2.20.020.M of the City of Georgetown Code of Ordinances)
and/or an "economic interest" (as defined in Sec. 2.20.020.E of the City of Georgetown Code of Ordinances) in the matter that is
identified and described on the above -referenced agenda item.
"I have a conflict of interest in the above -referenced agenda matter for the following reason(s): (check all that are applicable).
A. "Substantial Interest"
I or a person related to me in the first or second degree have an ownership of 10% or more of the voting stock or
shares of the business entity, or have an ownership of 10% or more of the fair market value of the business entity.
I or a
person
related to me in
the first or second degree
have an ownership
of $15,000 or more of the fair market
value
of the
business entity.
$2,500
or
more.
I or a person related
to me in
the
first or second degree received funds from the business entity in excess of 10%
of my/his/her gross
income
for
the previous year.
I or a person related to me in
the first or second
degree
have an equitable
or legal
ownership or interest in real
property with a fair market
value
of
$2,500
or
more.
B. "Economic Interest"
I or a person or entity whose interest is imputed to me under Chapter 2.20 of the City of Georgetown Code of
Ordinances have a legal or equitable interest in real or personal property or a fiduciary obligation to such property
or contractual right in such property that is more than minimal or insignificant and would be recognized by
reasonable persons to have weight in deciding a case or an issue.
C. "Other"
For reason other than those listed above, I have a conflict of interest (Please specify, e.g. Sec. 2 24.170 or other
`{
reason) d46i.lFC1"e.t, �} 6'Y- (.�.�,{,,' 51 L. �xJl �7 i714 = . `:u .: of
"Upon filing of this affidavit with the recording secretary and/or the City Secretary, I affirm that I will abstain from all participation,
discussion and voting involving the matter identified in the above -referenced agenda item whatsoever.
Further, Affiant sayeth not."
Affiant's Signatu
Printed Name:
Date: -- 4PS'
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared the above-named person who on oath stated that
the facts hereinabove stated are true to the best of his/her knowledge or belief.
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me on this day of 6*bLakoI
r200
Notary Public in and for the
County of Williamson
of Texas
THIS AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE KEPT WITH THE OFFICIAL MINUTES OF THIS MEETING. IF AFFIANT HAS CHECKED ANY OF THE ITEMS UNDER
SECTION "A" RELATING TO "SUBSTANTIAL INTEREST," A COPY OF THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST ALSO BE SENT TO THE CITY SECRETARY FOR
THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN.
Conflict of Interest Affidavit
Rev. 8/25/2004