HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes_P&Z_11.07.2006
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
November 7, 2006 Page 1 of 10
City of Georgetown, Texas
Minutes of the
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Tuesday, November 7, 2006 at 6:00 P.M.
Council Chambers
101 E. Seventh Street, Georgetown, Texas 78626
Members Present: Johnny Anderson, Chair; Will Moore, Secretary; Sarah Milburn, Marlene
McMichael, Jennifer Shield.
Alternates Present: *Patrick Lawson and *Don Padfield
*alternate served as a voting member
Members Absent: Harry Gibbs, Vice-Chair; Brian Ortego & Russell Phillips
Staff Present: Bobby Ray, Director; Melissa McCollum, Development Planner; Carla Benton,
Development Planner; Jennifer Bills Development Planner; David Munk, Development Engineer;
Jordan Maddox, Long Range Planner; Heather Brewer, Urban Forester; Trish Carls, City
Attorney; and Stephanie Mickan McNickle, Recording Secretary.
Regular Session - To begin no earlier than 6:00 p.m.
Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Chair Anderson stated the order of the meeting and that those who speak must turn in a speaker
form to the recording secretary before the item that they wish to address begins. Each speaker
will be permitted to address the Commission one time only, for a maximum of three (3) minutes,
unless otherwise agreed to before the meeting begins.
1. Action from Executive Session. There was not an Executive Session.
Consent Agenda
The Consent Agenda includes non-controversial and routine items that the Commission may
act on with one single vote. A Commissioner or any member of the public may request that
any item from the Consent Agenda be pulled in order that the Commission may discuss and
act upon it individually as part of the Regular Agenda. The Planning and Zoning
Commission's approval of an item on the Consent Agenda will be consistent with the staff
recommendation described in the report, unless otherwise noted.
3. Consideration of the Minutes of the October 3, 2006 meeting of the Planning and Zoning
Commission.
Motion by Moore to approve the Consent Agenda item, which includes the minutes. Second by
McMichael. Approved 7-0.
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
November 7, 2006 Page 2 of 10
Regular Agenda
4 Public Hearing and Possible Action on an amendment to Table 2.01.020, Sections
2.04.010(A)(2) and 3.13.080 of the Unified Development Code (UDC) Relating to Appeals from
Decisions of the Historical and Architectural Review Commission.
Staff report given by Bobby Ray. An Ordinance changing the appeals body for Certificate of
Design Compliance (CDC) from the Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) to the City Council as
directed by the Council at its regular meeting on October 10, 2006.
The ordinance simply removes the ZBA as the appeal body for Certificates of Design
Compliance, establishing the City Council as the appeals body for Certificate of Design
Compliance. Per the amendment to Section 3.13.080 all other procedures regarding the
appeals process are kept in place.
Chair Anderson opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward to speak. The Public
Hearing was closed.
Motion by McMichael to recommend to the City Council approval of the ordinance amending
table 2.01.020, Section 2.04.010(A)(2) and 3.13.080 of the Unified Development Code (UDC)
relating to appeals from the decision of the Historical and Architectural Review Commission.
Second by Moore. Approved 7-0.
5. Public Hearing and Possible Action on amendments to Section 11.03 (Preservation of Natural
Features and Trees) of the Unified Development Code to add a Heritage Tree Protection
Requirement and Section 11.03.020, (Tree Survey Required) to eliminate the five gross acre
exception for Non-residential development.
Staff report given by Heather Brewer, Urban Forrester. During the City Council workshop
meeting September 25, 2006 the City Council authorized city staff to begin processing an
amendment to the Unified Development Code (UDC) for the inclusion of a Heritage Tree
Ordinance and eliminating the five acres or larger provision for requiring tree surveys on Non-
residential development. Currently the UDC only requires non-residential sites that are 5 acres or
greater to provide tree surveys and require tree protection and mitigation for removal of certain
trees. This amendment would remove the exception for sites under 5 acres. The proposed
changes also include adding a section that would define and designate a process for the
protection of Heritage Trees. The following trees that measure 30 inches or greater in diameter at
breast height (DBH) would be subject to the restrictions of code:
Live Oak, Post Oak, Shumard Oak, Bur Oak, Chinquapin Oak, Montgomery Oak, Bald
Cypress, American Elm, Cedar Elm, Pecan, Walnut, Texas Ash, Southern Magnolia.
Any tree that fits this description would require review through a process set by this amendment
and a permit from the City’s Urban forester before being pruned or removed. In order to assist a
developer to keep Heritage Trees on a site, the proposed amendment includes tools and
incnetives, which will give staff the ability to allow some flexibility on the site plan to save trees.
If the applicant has been denied a permit to remove a Heritage Tree, the decision would be
appealed before the City Council. Individuals that remove or prune Heritage Trees without a
permit would be subject to a combination of penalties including monetary fines and elevated tree
mitigation requirements.
Chair Anderson asked staff if there has been an economic impact study done. Staff said “no”.
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
November 7, 2006 Page 3 of 10
Commissioner McMichael asked staff for the cost of a tree survey. Staff did not know the cost.
Melissa McCollum stated that currently the UDC states that a tree survey is done on a tract that
is more than 5 acres with trees 12 inches or more in diameter. The propose change ask for a tree
survey to be done on a 5-acre or less commercial/residential tract with trees 12 inches or more in
diameter.
Commissioner McMichael asked staff if someone has a 30-inch diameter tree in their yard, will
they need a permit to prune it? If so, what would be the cost of pruning the tree? Staff stated cost
has not been determined, but will be addressed if the ordinance is adopted. Staff informed the
Commissioners in order to protect designated heritage trees, staff recommends a certified
arborist or an employee of the company to prune the tree.
Chair Anderson opened the Public Hearing. John Gavurnik, 2004 Williams Dr stated he
strongly supports an ordinance of this type, however, there are several requirements in the
proposed ordinance that he feels is not workable. Mr. Gavurnik stated he is currently having a
tree survey done on a 48-inch diameter tree and is glad to pay for, but does not feel he should
be forced to pay for a tree survey.
Mr. Gavurik stated that he feels this ordinance is being pushed through without public
opinion.
Mr. Gavurik stated he agrees with the incentive section of the ordinance and knows staff
worked hard on this proposed ordinance, but feels there are concerns that need to be
addressed before being presented to City Council.
Melissa McCollum informed the Commissioners this proposed ordinance was a hold over from
some of the City Council’s concerns from last time. These issues were recently brought up again
because of the concern to protect these heritage trees. In the past, some one and two acre business
lots would clear-cut every tree on the site and no mitigation or tree surveys were required.
Melissa McCollum stated that unfortunately, there is a cost involved for a tree survey, but staff
proposes incentives in the ordinance to help defray the cost. Melissa stated a survey would be
required for all commercial projects with trees 12 inches or more in diameter. A survey will be
required only for residential projects with trees 30 inches or more in diameter.
Motion by Lawson to recommend approval to remove the 5-acre minimum requirement for
requiring tree protection for Non-residential development. Second by Shield. Approved 4-3.
(Anderson, McMichael, Moore)
Motion by Shield to recommend denial of creation of the Heritage Tree Preservation section
11.03.020 within the Unified Development Code. Second by McMichael. Approved 6-1 (Milburn)
6. Public Hearing and possible action on a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the
intensity level from level 1 to level 4 for 151.032 acres in the Antonio Manchaca Survey,
Abstract 421, and 166.1854 acres in the William Roberts Survey, Abstract 524, also to be
known as 35 Business Park Limited, located east of IH-35 along FM-972. CPA-2006-017
Staff report given by Jordan Maddox. The subject properties are located at the corner of FM
972 and I-35 in two parcels. The owner is requesting a Level 4 designation on property that is
designated Light Industrial on the Future Land Use Map. As this project lies outside of the
Georgetown Water CCN (Certificate of Convenience and Necessity) and currently is past any
extensions of wastewater lines, the applicant explored alternative wastewater possibilities and
reached an agreement with Georgetown Utility Systems (GUS) on a treatment facility. A
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
November 7, 2006 Page 4 of 10
letter of fire flow was also reached by the applicant with the Jonah S.U.D. (Special Utility
District) and the Chisholm S.U.D to provide acceptable fire flow for the proposed
development.
Staff is recommending approval of the Century Plan Amendment because the Intensity Level
increase from 1 to 4 is more consistent with the Future Land Use designation for the area,
which is Light Industrial. The water service letter of intent secured by the applicant is
sufficient for the proposed use and for emergency services and The project is within the City of
Georgetown Wastewater Service area and the agreement reached with G.U.S. assures that the
area can be readily served with wastewater for the future.
Chair Anderson invited the applicant to speak. Doug Lewis, 1301 S. IH 35, Ste 200, Austin
stated he will be glad to answer questions.
Mr. Lewis stated the property is designated for commercial, light industrial and retail.
Chair Anderson opened the Public Hearing.
Eunice Hastings, 501 CR 972 stated she is concerned with the type of light industrial, which
will be located across the street from her home. She stated she is for growth, but is concerned
with the water and air supply. David Munk stated the City does not have control use in the
ETJ. The developer has worked extensively with the water company who will be able to meet
the water demand.
Motion by Shield for approval of an ordinance of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment
changing the Intensity Map from Level 1 to Level 4, for 151. 032 acres in the Antonio
Manchaca Survey, abstract 421, and 166.185 acres in the William Roberts Survey, abstract 524,
located at FM 972 and IH-35. Second by Milburn. Approved 7-0.
7. Public Hearing and possible action on a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the land
use from Residential to Mixed Use for 51.5 acres in the Lewis Dyches Survey (A-180), located
south of SE Inner Loop and east of Blue Springs Boulevard. CPA-2006-018
Staff report given by Jordan Maddox. This project was an Economic Development project that
is requesting voluntary annexation along with its Land Use Change. The City recently
received voluntary annexation from the county of the portion of SE Inner Loop directly north
of this site. This allowed the City to be close enough to this site to be able to annex by way of
an easement connecting the site to the Inner Loop (shown on Exhibit A). The data center
targeted for the site has requested a mixed-use land designation that will be appropriate for its
use. The existing Intensity Levels are sufficient at 3 and 5. The site is within the Georgetown
water and wastewater service area and service will be extended to the project. The applicant is
submitting a zoning change and plat simultaneously, as well as a petition for voluntary
annexation. Staff is recommending approval of the Century Plan Amendment because the
Future Land Use change from Residential to Mixed-Use is consistent with the Future Land Use
designation for the area directly to the north and west, which is also Mixed-Use. This area is
also well suited for mixed use, this designation allows for many development options in the
future, the intensity level designation for the site is appropriate for this type of development,
and the project is within the City of Georgetown Water and Wastewater Service area.
Chair Anderson opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward to speak. The Public
Hearing was closed.
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
November 7, 2006 Page 5 of 10
Motion by Milburn to approve the Ordinance Comprehensive Plan Amendment Future Land
Use Change from Residential to Mixed-Use for 51.5 acres in the Lewis P. Dyches, located near
Blue Springs and SE Inner Loop. Second by Shield. Approved 7-0.
8. Public Hearing and Possible Action on a Rezoning of 51.76 acres in the Lewis Dyches Survey,
Abstract No. 180, from AG, Agriculture District to OF, Office District located south of the
Southeast Inner Loop and east of Blue Springs Boulevard (REZ 2006-038).
Staff report given by Bobby Ray. The 51.76-acre property is located on the south side of
Southeast Inner Loop and east of Blue Springs Boulevard. The zoning request includes an
11,443 square foot strip extending from the property to the Inner Loop right-of-way. The
property is currently in the voluntary annexation process to be brought into the City Limits.
Upon completion of annexation, the property will be zoned as AG, Agriculture consistent with
the default zoning for newly annexed territory. The Future Land use Plan designates the
property as “Residential” with an Intensity Level is of “4”. A concurrent application is being
processed for a land use plan amendment from “Residential” to “Mixed Use”. The applicant is
requesting an OF, Office zoning which serves as an implementing district of the “Mixed Use”
designation.
The proposal is a rezoning request from AG, Agriculture to OF, Office to allow for the
development of a data center. The proposed development consists of an approximately
305,000 square foot data storage facility, employing approximately 35 people. The purpose of
the OF zoning district is intended to provide a location for offices and related uses. The uses
allowed have relatively low traffic generation. Small areas of the OF District may be
appropriate adjacent to most residential uses, and as a transition between residential areas and
commercial areas.
Chair Anderson stated a datacenter that is 300,000 square feet requires gigantic air
conditioning units outside because of the tremendous amount of equipment to keep cool on
the inside also large generators on the roof or outside in case the electricity shuts down. Chair
Anderson also stated he has seen barbed wire used around the buildings along with laser
beams to detect intruders.
Chair Anderson asked staff if rezoning to office use would be enough for a project of this size.
Bobby Ray stated the use for this project qualifies for office use rezoning.
Chair Anderson invited the applicant to speak. Kelly Bell with Bury and Partners stated she is
the applicant for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment request for this property. Ms. Bell
stated she and her client is comfortable with the office use rezoning and feels it is the best one
that fits the project.
Ms. Bell stated the project will require cooling towers and will have air conditioning units, but
not the size Chair Anderson stated. There will also be generators on site in case the power goes
down located next to the building enclosed by a fence. Ms Bell is uncertain regarding the use
of barbed wire.
Chair Anderson opened the Public Hearing. Johnny Stanford, 430 CR 166 stated he is
concerned with the size of the facility, the access and the remainder of the tract.
Staff stated an easement from inner loop was granted. The remainder of the tract is zoned
residential and not in the city limits.
Chair Anderson closed the Public Hearing.
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
November 7, 2006 Page 6 of 10
Motion by Milburn to conduct the first reading of the Ordinance Rezoning 51.76 acres in the
Lewis Dyches Survey, Abstract No. 180, from AG, Agriculture District to OF, Office District
located south of the Southeast Inner Loop and east of Blue Springs Boulevard. Second by
McMichael. Approved 7-0.
9. Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning from PUD, Planned Use Development
district to MU-DT, Mixed Use Downtown district for 0.26 acres in the Dalrymple Addition,
Block G, (N/PT), located at 406 W. University. REZ-2006-037
Staff report given by Rebecca Rowe. The property was rezoned in 1996 (Ordinance No. 96-31)
from RS, Residential Single Family to RP, Residential Planned to accommodate an office use.
The RP zoning approval was conditioned upon submittal of a Detailed Development Plan
(DDP) for Commission and Council review to “determine the proposed use will preserve the
historic appearance of the property and will not create detrimental uses of the property,
including but not limited to, excessive noise and traffic...” With the adoption of the UDC in
2003 all RP zoned properties were transitioned to the PUD district.
The applicant is seeking a rezoning from the current “RS”, Residential Single Family district
to “MUDT”, Mixed Use Downtown district. Per the submitted letter of request, the applicant
is seeking the rezoning to accommodate the current use as well as to be in compliance with
the Future Land Use Plan. Staff is supportive of this rezoning.
Chair Anderson opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward to speak. The Public
Hearing was closed.
Motion by Moore to conduct the first reading of an Ordinance Rezoning a 0.26 acre portion of
Block G of the Dalrymple Addition, from RS, Residential Single-family District with a PUD,
Planned Unit Development Overlay to MUDT, Mixed Use Downtown district for the property
located at 406 University. Second by McMichael. Approved 7-0.
At this time agenda, #10 and #11 were presented together.
10. Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning from AG, Agriculture district to PUD,
Planned Unit Development for 44.121 acres in the Frederick Foy Survey, A-229, to be known
as the Planned Unit Development of Sun City, Neighborhood Fifty-One, located
approximately west of the intersection of Cool Springs Way and Pedernales Falls Drive. REZ-
2006-039
Staff report given by Melissa McCollum. This area is part of the new Sun City Texas area that
is incorporated as part of the 8th Amended Concept Plan. The proposed development consists
of 127 residential units to be developed as detached single-family lots. The development is
presented as a PUD in order to accommodate the detached single family with regards to lot
sizes and setbacks. The proposed development standards are consistent with the standards
requested as part of the Development Agreement between the City and the developer. These
standards were updated with the 8th Amended Concept Plan. Neighborhood fifty-one consists
of 127 detached single-family residential units.
This plat will complete one of two ties to existing planned neighboring subdivisions. The
local street designated as West Majestic Oak Lane in the preliminary plat of Woodland Park
West subdivision will be connected as a local street within this Neighborhood Fifty-one. Staff
supports the proposed request.
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
November 7, 2006 Page 7 of 10
Chair Anderson invited the applicant to speak. Simon Gonzales, TCB stated he would be glad
to answer any questions.
Chair Anderson opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward to speak. The Public
Hearing was closed.
Motion by Milburn for approval of the Rezoning from AG, Agriculture district to PUD,
Planned Unit Development for 44.121 acres in the Frederick Foy Survey, A-229, to be known
as the Planned Unit Development of Sun City, Neighborhood Fifty-One, located
approximately west of the intersection of Cool Springs Way and Pedernales Falls Drive.
Second by Shield. Approved 7-0.
11. Consideration and possible action on a Public Review Final Plat for 44.121 acres in the
Frederick Foy Survey, A-229, to be known as the Planned Unit Development of Sun City,
Neighborhood Fifty-One, located approximately west of the intersection of Cool Springs Way
and Pedernales Falls Drive. PP-2006-040
Staff report given by Melissa McCollum. This area is part of the new Sun City Texas area that
is incorporated as part of the 8th Amended Concept Plan. The minimum lot size planned for
this development is 6,120 square feet. The Development Agreement outlines the standards for
detached single-family lots to be a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet, and the setbacks are
20’ front, 20’ rear and 5’ side. Neighborhood Fifty-One is surrounded by Neighborhood Fifty-
three to the east and future Neighborhoods to the west and north, and proposed subdivision
of Woodland Park West to the south. This plat will complete one of two ties to existing
planned neighboring subdivisions. The local street designated as West Majestic Oak Lane in
the preliminary plat of Woodland Park West subdivision will be connected as a local street
within this Neighborhood Fifty-one. This meets all requirements of the Development
Agreement.
Motion by Milburn for Approval of the Public Review Final Plat for 44.121 acres in the
Frederick Foy Survey, A-229, to be known as the Planned Unit Development of Sun City,
Neighborhood Fifty-One, located approximately west of the intersection of Cool Springs Way
and Pedernales Falls Drive. Second by Padfield. Approved 7-0.
12. Consideration and possible action on a Final Plat for the Resubdivision of 6.1739 Fredrick Foy
Survey (A-229) being Lot 11 & 12, Lakewood Estates, Block D, located at 6824, 6826, and 6828
South Lakewoods Drive. FP-2006-040
Staff report given by Melissa McCollum. Lakewood Estates Subdivision is an existing platted
subdivision located north of Sun City in the City of Georgetown’s ETJ. This subdivision
contains large single-family residential lots built to rural standards. This subdivision was
recorded with Williamson County on August 11, 1980. Lots 11-12 are a total of 6.17 acres. Lot
12 is currently built with three homes on one lot owned by the same family and Lot 11 is
undeveloped. This plat will divide the one lot with the three existing homes to be on three
separate lots and the other lot to be divided into two single-family lots. The applicant
proposes to divide the tract from two lots into a total of five single-family residential lots, each
being approximately 1.1 acres each. This proposed application is for the creation of three
additional lots.
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
November 7, 2006 Page 8 of 10
Chair Anderson opened the Public Hearing. Patty Tooley 6818 Lakewoods Drive South stated
she is concerned with the applicant being able to build additional homes on his 3 acre lot and
now wanting to subdivide to accommodate these homes.
Commissioner Shield stated she agrees and understands Ms. Tooley’s concern. Ms. Shield
stated that she feels the applicant has found a way to go around the guidelines feels there is a
principal issue here. Ms. McCollum stated the City does not dictate on uses of a property in
the ETJ. Commissioner Shield asked if there were any deed restrictions for the neighborhood.
Ms. McCollum stated the city does not review deed restrictions. Ms. Tooley informed the
commissioners that there is a deed restriction. City Attorney Patricia Carls reminded the
Commissioners that this platting and if it is consistent with the Unified Development Code
(UDC) then it should be approved. If it is not consistent with the deed restrictions, then that
needs to be addressed later, but for our purpose today it only needs to meet the UDC.
Motion by shield for approval of a final plat for the resubdivision of 6.1739 Fredrick Foy
Survey (A-229) being Lot 11 & 12, Lakewood Estates, Block D, located at 6824, 6826, and 6828
South Lakewoods Drive. Second by Milburn. Approved 7-0.
13. Consideration and possible action on a Special Use Permit to allow indoor entertainment in
the MU-DT, Mixed Use Downtown district on a 0.0992 acre part of Lots 1, 2, & 4 (part), City of
Georgetown, Block 41, located at 704 South Austin Avenue. SUP-2006-002
Staff report given by Rebecca Rowe. The zoning is MUDT, Mixed Use Downtown with an
intensity level 6. The Future Land Use Plan designation for the site is “Downtown.” The
applicant is seeking a Special Use Permit for a special event facility, which is classified as
Indoor Entertainment per Table 16.03.050 (B) of the Unified Development Code. The facility
would have the capacity for seated service of parties up to 230 people on the first floor and a
mezzanine level. The space will also include a “bridal” room, new restrooms and a caterer’s
prep kitchen. The facility would be made available for weekend rentals in 8-hour blocks and
shorter periods during the week. The business would cater to weddings and wedding
receptions as well as conference space, business meetings, corporate training and fundraisers.
The applicant’s intention is to use Georgetown businesses, particularly downtown businesses,
on its “preferred vendors” list. They are also looking into the possibility of leasing space in
the facility to event and wedding industry vendors to create a retail use during regular
business hours when the facility is not booked for an event. The applicant was asked to
submit a floor plan illustrating the use of space proposed for the facility. This floor plan
indicates that the structure is adequate for the proposed use. Additionally the applicant
intends to provide the option of valet parking for events. However, the issue of primary
concern is that the use would essentially create a dead space in the retail face along the 700
block of South Austin Avenue, which is something that is not in keeping with the Downtown
Master Plan. The addition of the proposed retail use during regular business hours would be
essential in maintaining the active uses in the first floor of the buildings along this block and
thereby maintaining the viability of the Downtown as a retail destination.
Commissioner Milburn asked staff what would happen if the applicant were not able to fill
the dead space. Rebecca stated the applicant would not be able to gain a certificate of design
compliance. Rebecca stated staff is just a little concerned with the dead space during the day.
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
November 7, 2006 Page 9 of 10
Chair Anderson invited the applicant to speak. Danielle Penland stated they are interviewing
venders to set up shop in the dead space that can easily be stored during the evening. Ms.
Penland states she currently works with other event planners and will be using it as office
space.
Commissioner Lawson asked staff to address the parking issue. Rebecca Rowe stated there is
no parking requirement in area one of the downtown overlay district, but are proposing valet
parking.
Commissioner Shield stated there is plenty of parking in that area. She also feels this is a great
opportunity to bring more people downtown.
Motion by Shield to recommend to the City Council approval of the Special Use Permit
allowing the indoor entertainment use for City of Georgetown, Block 41, Lots 1 – 2 (PTS) and
4 (PT) located at 704 South Austin Avenue with the condition that a retail and/or office
component with regular business hours be included in the space. Second by McMichael.
Approved 7-0.
14. Consideration and possible action on a Vacation of a Final Plat of Pecan Branch North, Phases
II and III, (Planned Unit Development) being 57.034 acres in the John Berry Survey, Abstract
51 located on FM 971 east of CR 152. FP-2006-027
Staff report given by Carla Benton. The applicant proposes to vacate 57.034 acres of Phases II
and III of Pecan Branch North (Planned Unit Development). Phases II and III are the
remaining tracts of Pecan Branch North, Phases II thru IV which was approved by City
Council on September 25, 2001, for the development of a manufactured home park. Phase IV
is being developed by TXDoT as State Highway 130.
Chair Anderson invited the applicant to speak. Duane Hutson, 4833 Spicewood Springs Rd.,
Austin stated he would be happy to answer any questions.
Chair Anderson opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward to speak. The Public
Hearing was closed.
Motion by McMichael for approval of a vacation of a Final Plat of Pecan Branch North, Phases
II and III, (Planned Unit Development) being 57.034 acres in the John Berry Survey, Abstract
51. Second by Moore. Approved 7-0.
15. Consideration and possible action on a Public Review Final Plat of a replat of Cimarron Hills,
PUD, Phase 3, Section 2 A; being Cimarron Hills PUD, Phase 1, Section 4, Block B, Lot 2 and
13.92 acres in the A.H. Porter Survey, A-490, located on Cimarron Hills Trail East. PP-2006-028
The original plat of Cimarron Hills PUD, Phase 1, Section 4 was recorded February 28, 2001.
Block B, Lot 2 of that plat contained 6.10 acres and included landscape, open area, easements
and right-of-way which is being reconfigured. An additional 13.92 acres of land was
originally included in a Public Review Final Plat of Cimarron Hills PUD, Phase 3, Section 2,
which was approved by City Council on January 14, 2003. A Final Plat for 43.772 acres of this
Public Review Final Plat has been recorded; the remainder of the originally approved plat is
included in this application and proposed as a public review final plat to be known as
Cimarron Hills PUD, Phase 3, Section 2A. This application proposes to develop 35 single-
family residential lots and 3 landscape/open space lots with a total acreage of 20.019 acres.
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
November 7, 2006 Page 10 of 10
Chair Anderson invited the applicant to speak. Mike Coopman ,Cimarron Hills stated he will
be glad to answer any
Chair Anderson opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward to speak. The Public
Hearing was closed.
Motion by McMichael for approval of a Public Review Final Plat of a replat of Cimarron Hills,
PUD, Phase 3, Section 2 A; being Cimarron Hills, PUD, Phase 1, Section 4, Block B, Lot 2
and13.92 acres in the A.H. Porter Survey, A-490. Second by Moore. Approved 7-0.
16. Comments from Director.
Bobby Ray stated staff held three public comprehensive plan meetings November 2nd, 3rd and
4th with attendance totaling 60. Mr. Ray stated there are 25 involuntary annexations which is
scheduled for first reading during the November 14th City Council meeting.
17. Comments from Commissioners.
NA
Motion to adjourn. Chair Anderson adjourned the meeting at 9:10 p.m.
_______________________________ __________________________________
Approved, Johnny Anderson, Chair Attested, Will Moore, Secretary