Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes_P&Z_09.05.2006 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes September 5, 2006 Page 1 of 7 City of Georgetown, Texas Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Tuesday, September 5th, 2006 at 6:00 P.M. Council Chambers 101 E. Seventh Street, Georgetown, Texas 78626 Members Present: Johnny Anderson, Chair; Harry Gibbs, Vice-Chair; Will Moore, Secretary Sarah Milburn, Brian Ortego, Marlene McMichael, Jennifer Shield. Alternates Present: Don Padfield, Russell Phillips and Patrick Lawson. Members Absent: NA Staff Present: Bobby Ray, Director; Melissa McCollum, Development Planner; Carla Benton, Development Planner; David Munk, Development Engineer; Jordan Maddox, Long Range Planner; Trish Carls, City Attorney; and Stephanie Mickan McNickle, Recording Secretary. Regular Session - To begin no earlier than 6:00 p.m. Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance. Chair Anderson stated the order of the meeting and that those who speak must turn in a speaker form to the recording secretary before the item that they wish to address begins. Each speaker will be permitted to address the Commission one time only, for a maximum of three (3) minutes, unless otherwise agreed to before the meeting begins. 1. Action from Executive Session. There was not an Executive Session. Consent Agenda The Consent Agenda includes non-controversial and routine items that the Commission may act on with one single vote. A Commissioner or any member of the public may request that any item from the Consent Agenda be pulled in order that the Commission may discuss and act upon it individually as part of the Regular Agenda. The Planning and Zoning Commission's approval of an item on the Consent Agenda will be consistent with the staff recommendation described in the report, unless otherwise noted. 2. Consideration of the Minutes of the August 1, 2006 meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Motion by Milburn to approve the Consent Agenda item, which includes the minutes. Second by Sheild. Approved 7-0. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes September 5, 2006 Page 2 of 7 Regular Agenda 3. Public Hearing and possible action on an Amendment to Chapter 13 (“Infrastructure and Public Improvements”) of the Unified Development Code (UDC) pertaining to the creation of special districts and utility infrastructure in rural residential subdivisions. Staff report was given by Tom Yantis, Georgetown Assistant City Manager. At the direction of the City Council, staff drafted a new section 13.10 of the UDC to govern the city’s review and possible creation of Special Districts. The new section establishes prerequisites to create a special district, application materials to assist the staff in analyzing consent applications, and conditions that must be in each agreement. In addition to the new regulation governing the creation of MUD’s, the staff has identified other necessary changes in Chapter 13 to clarify the appropriate types of wastewater infrastructure in rural residential subdivisions. Article III, Section 52 and Article XVI, Section 59 of the Texas Constitution authorizes the creation of special districts. One such type of district is a Municipal Utility District (MUD). The City has received petitions for the creation of MUD’s and expects to continue to receive them in the future. Therefore, the City Council directed staff to develop a policy governing the review and possible creation of MUDs within the City’s planning jurisdiction. A MUD is a separate political subdivision from the City with the authority to impose ad valorem taxes within its jurisdiction. The primary purpose for the creation of MUDs is to finance the public infrastructure necessary for the development within the MUD (i.e. water, wastewater, etc.). Once a MUD is created, the area within the MUD cannot be annexed by a City without the City accepting the outside debt of the MUD. The City Council has expressed its desire to limit the creation of MUDs to areas that the City does not plan to annex in the future and areas where the City does not plan to provide water or wastewater services in the future. Goal 1 of the Future land Use Plan calls for the City to “Encourage the most desirable and efficient use of land while enhancing the physical environment through functional and compatible land use configurations.” These regulations are intended to allow the City to continue to establish appropriate land use regulations and environmental protections in areas that the City intends to ultimately annex or to which City utility services will be provided. Goal 2 of the Future Land Use Plan requires the City to “Provide for orderly and coordinated growth on the City of Georgetown’s boundaries.” These regulations help ensure that areas of importance for the City and areas intended for future annexation are not encumbered by their incorporation into other political subdivisions. Before the City Council consents to the creation of a district, the following shall be considered: 1) If applicable, whether the area proposed for inclusion in the district meets criteria for annexation set out in the City’s annexation policy and is within the City’s projected ultimate city limit boundary; and Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes September 5, 2006 Page 3 of 7 2) Whether the City will provide water and/or wastewater services to the land within the proposed district at a reasonable cost and will commence construction of facilities necessary to serve the land within 2 years and substantially complete such construction within 4 1/2 years after submittal of the petition pursuant to the City’s policies on the extension of utility services. Chair Anderson stated he feels the prerequisites to the consent statement in Chapter 13.10.030 Section A needs to state “Before the City Council consents to the creation of a district, the following shall “meet” and cross out shall “be considered”, so the language is a little clearer. Trish stated the sentence in question is clarified in Section B, & C. However, she states the statement can be changed if needed. Chair Anderson opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward to speak. The Public Hearing was closed. Motion made by Shield to recommend to the City Council approval of the amendment to Chapter 13 (“Infrastructure and Public Improvements”) with the changes to section 13.10.030 (Before the City Council consents to creation of a district, the following shall “meet”) as discussed, of the Unified Development Code (UDC) pertaining to the creation of special districts and utility infrastructure in rural residential subdivisions. Second by Moore Approved 7-0. 4. Public Hearing and possible action on a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Intensity Level from Levels 2, 3 and 5 to Level 4 for 52 acres; and to change the Future Land Use from Residential to Office/Retail/Commercial for a section of the 52 acres in the John Berry Survey, located at 1800 FM 971. CPA-2006-016 Staff report given by Jordan Maddox. The subject property is located at the southwest corner of FM 971 and SH 130 with the Inner Loop slicing through to create two separate parcels: 44.01 acres to the east of Inner Loop and 6.44 acres to the west. The applicant is seeking a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Intensity Level from Levels 2 and 3 to Level 4 on the 6.44 acres adjacent to the school property; and from Levels 2, 3, and 5 to Level 4 on the remaining 44.01 acres to build approximately 260 multi-family units, 92 townhouse units, and approximately 6 acres of office/commercial/retail. In addition to the Intensity Level request there is a Future Land Use amendment request to Office/Retail/Commercial for the 6.44 acres to support the above uses. The project is within the city of Georgetown wastewater service area and currently has the capacity to serve the proposed intensity level of 4. Chair Anderson invited the applicant to speak. Don Tardy stated he would be glad to answer any questions. Chair Anderson opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward to speak. The Public Hearing was closed. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes September 5, 2006 Page 4 of 7 Mr. Tardy stated there will be about 350 units which could house about 1,000 residents including children. Ms. Milburn asked Mr. Tardy to notify the school district and inform them of the numbers so they can be prepared. Motion by Ortego to recommend to the City Council approval of the requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Intensity Level from Levels 2, 3, and 5 to Level 4; and to change the future land use from Residential to Office/Retail/Commercial for 6.44 acres out of 52 in the John Berry Survey, located between Inner Loop and SH 130 at 1800 FM 971. Second by Shield. Approved 7-0. 5. Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning from AG, Agricultural district to C-3, General Commercial, TH, Townhouse district, and MF, Multifamily district for approximately 52 acres in the John Berry Survey, located at 1800 FM 971. REZ-2006-029 Staff report was given by Jennifer Bills. This property is located along FM 971 and adjacent to the future State Highway 130. North East Inner Loop bisects the property into two parcels. The approximately 52 acre tract was annexed into the Georgetown city limits in 1998 with the default zoning of AG, Agricultural. Staff is supportive of the proposed rezoning. This development will be situated between three major roadways, FM 971, NE Inner Loop, and SH 130. With this level of road access, a mix of general commercial uses along the road frontage, with adjacent higher density residential development would be appropriate. Chair Anderson opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward to speak. The Public Hearing was closed. Motion by Gibbs to recommend to City Council approval of the rezoning from AG, Agricultural district to 17.74 acres of C-3, General Commercial, 17.39 acres of TH, Townhouse district, and 14.75 acres of MF, Multifamily district for approximately 52 acres in the John Berry Survey, located at 1800 FM 971. Second by Milburn. Approved 7-0. 6. Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning from RS, Residential Single Family district to MU-DT, Mixed Use Downtown district for a 0.4133 acre part of Lost Addition part of Block 68, located at 407 W. University. REZ-2006-030 Staff report was given by Rebecca Rowe. The site is located on the north side of University Avenue, west of Austin avenue and is currently developed with a residential structure. The surrounding properties are zoned RS, Residential Single Family; OF, Office; C1 Local Commercial district and PUD, Planned Unit Development. The property is with the Downtown Overlay District which has a future land use designation of Downtown. A property across University Avenue has completed a a pre-application conference for rezoning as well. The applicant is seeking a rezoning from the current RS, Residential Single Family district to MUDT, Mixed Used Downtown district. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes September 5, 2006 Page 5 of 7 There are no immediate plans to redevelop the property. The applicant will be required to submit a site plan as a part of this development. The site is suitable for the range of uses permitted in the MUDT, Mixed Use Downtown district. Chair Anderson invited the applicant to speak. Jim Cummins with Steger and Bizzell stated he is representing the applicant, and will be glad to answer questions. Jim Cummins stated the applicant is asking for a rezoning to sell the property. Chair Anderson opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward to speak. The Public Hearing was closed. Motion by Milburn to recommend to City Council approval of the Rezoning of a portion of Block 68 of the Lost Addition, from RS, Residential Single-family District to MUDT, Mixed Use Downtown District for the property located at 407 University. Second by Shield. Approved 7-0. 7. Public Hearing and possible action on a Rezoning from AG, Agricultural district to PUD, Planned Unit Development for 32.968 acres in the Frederick Foy Survey, Abstract #229, to be known as the Planned Unit Development of Sun City PUD, Neighborhood Fifty-Three, located approximately 1 1/2 mile west of the intersection of Sun City Blvd and Cool Springs Way on Pedernales Falls Drive. REZ-2006-031 Staff report was given by Melissa McCollum. This application is submitted concurrent with the public review final plat for this property. Section 3.6.030 and 3.06.040 of the UDC identifies the approval criteria and specific objectives required for the establishment of a PUD district. Neighborhood 53 consists of 92 detached single-family residential units. Chair Anderson invited the applicant to speak. Simon Gonzales with Sun City stated he would be glad to answer questions. Chair Anderson opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward to speak. The Public Hearing was closed. Motion by McMichael to approve the rezoning from AG, Agricultural district to PUD, Planned Unit Development for 32.968 acres in the Frederick Foy Survey, Abstract 229, to be known as the Planned Unit Development of Sun City PUD, Neighborhood Fifty-Three, located approximately 1.5 miles west on the intersection of the Sun City Blvd. and Cool Springs Way on Pedernales Falls Drive. Second by Ortega. Approved 7-0. 8. Consideration and possible action on a Public Review Final Plat for 32.968 acres in the Frederick Foy Survey, Abstract #229, to be known as the Planned Unit Development of Sun City PUD, Neighborhood Fifty-Three, located approximately 1 1/2 mile west of the intersection of Sun City Blvd and Cool Springs Way on Pedernales Falls Drive. PP-2006-022 Staff report given by Melissa McCollum. This preliminary plat is being processed concurrent with the rezoning application. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes September 5, 2006 Page 6 of 7 The 32.968-acre tract is currently vacant with proposed 92 residential units to be developed as detached single family. Chair Anderson opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward to speak. The Public Hearing was closed. Motion by Shield to approve the Public Review Final Plat for 32.968 acres in the Frederick Foy survey, Abstract 229, to be known as the Planned Unit Development of Sun City Georgetown Neighborhood Fifty-Three, located approximately 1.5 miles west of the intersection of Sun City Blvd and Cool Springs Way on Pedernales Falls Drive. Second by McMichael. Approved 7-0. 9. Consideration and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for 87.36 acres, being part of the C. Joyner Survey, C.B. Mayhall Survey, and the John Sutherland Survey, being a resubdivision of Calder Subdivision, Lot 1, and a resubdivision of Estates of Westlake, Lot 53, to be known as the Estates of Westlake, Phase 6A & 6B, located on CR 262 at Highland Springs, with waivers to the Unified Development Code. PP-2006-021 Staff report was given by Carla Benton. This tract is a combination of Lot 53 of the Estates of Westlake, Lot 1 (38.60 acres) of Calder Subdivision, a portion of Lots 15 and 16 of the Preliminary Plat of Tuscany Villas, Phase Two and unplatted acreage for a total of 87.36 acres to be developed as 68 residential lots of greater than 1 acre each. The applicant is proposing to pay parkland fees in lieu of dedication of land. A waiver is requested for Section 12.03.020.B.1. of the UDC to allow a 90 degree bend in San Marino Street without providing a minimum 180 foot centerline radius curve. The City of Georgetown requires that the proposed 90 degree bend in San Marino Street be revised to provide a minimum 180 foot centerline radius curve. Section 12.03.020.B.1. of the UDC states that the maximum deflection in street alignment permitted without use of a curve be 10 degrees The applicant has proposed to add building setbacks as a part of this plat. However, Section 6.01.030 of the UDC clearly indicates that the lot dimensional standards of Chapter 6, which includes building setbacks, does not apply to properties in the ETJ. Therefore, the placement of building setbacks on the plat would conflict with the City’s ordinances and imply an improper application of authority in the ETJ. Additionally it would put the City in a situation of requiring enforcement of standards over which we have no jurisdiction. Therefore it is requested that as part of the Commission’s motion that the building setbacks and referencing Plat Note 21 be removed prior to approval of the Final Plat. Staff recommends approval of a Preliminary Plat and Denial of the proposed waiver. Chair Anderson invited the applicant to speak. Tom Watts of Ralph Harris Surveying, applicant’s agent, stated they feel that a cul-de-sac is not required at the intersection of San Marino Trail and Buona Sera Trail and feels the right angle turn is wide enough for traffic. Commissioner Milburn asked Mr. Watts if the cul-de-sac can be added to the plan. Mr. Watts stated a cul-de-sac can be added, but strongly feels it is not needed. Commissioner Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes September 5, 2006 Page 7 of 7 Milburn asked staff if the UDC “Unified Development Code” is very clear regarding this waiver request. Mr. Munk stated the UDC is very clear regarding this waiver request, which is why staff is recommending denial. Commissioner Moore voiced concern regarding the payment of fees in lieu of dedication of parkland. Chair Anderson opened the Public Hearing. No one came forward to speak. The Public Hearing was closed. Motion by Shield to recommend to City Council approval of a Preliminary Plat for 87.36 acres, being part of the C. Joyner Survey, C.B. Mayhall Survey, and the John Sutherland Survey, being a Resubdivision of Calder Subdivision, Lot 1, and a Resubdivision of Estates of Westlake, Lot 53, to be known as the Estates of Westlake, Phase 6A & 6B. Denial of the proposed waiver to Section 12.03.020.B.1. and providing that the building setbacks and Plat Note 21 be removed prior to approval of the Final Plat. Approved 6-1. (Opposed – Moore) 10. Comments from Director. None 11. Comments from Commissioners. Chair Anderson asked if the Williams Gateway Plan was approved by Council. Assistant City Manager, Tom Yantis stated the Gateway project was presented and approved at Council. Chair Anderson asked Assistant City Manager Tom Yantis what steps the City would take to move into the implementation phase and is that something the Commissioners need to assist with. Possibly having a joint workshop with the economic development. Mr. Yantis agreed with this possibility. Mr. Yantis also stated that the city has met with Georgetown ISD regarding the McCoy school site and has drafted a McCoy site proposal, which was presented to the school district about a month ago. He will be presenting the school district reaction to the Council. Mr. Yantis also stated there is funding in the next fiscal year’s budget to do an overlay-zoning district for the extra Gateway area and the City then can establish the zoning districts standards. Mr. Yantis stated there is a lot going on and more information will be revealed soon. Motion by Milburn to adjourn. Chair Anderson adjourned the meeting at 7.21 p.m. _______________________________ __________________________________ Approved, Johnny Anderson, Chair Attested, Will Moore, Secretary